FCC Head Brenden Carr: Either The View Is a Bona Fide "News" Program, Or Else the Disney Groomer Network Will Have to Provide Equal Time to Republicans

Just because the law hasn't been enforced for a while doesn't mean it's not the law.

What would a "bona fide" news program look like? I don't know, but I imagine it would require editors who verify "facts" and would not allow Joy Behar and Sonny Hostin and Ana Navarro to just repeat whatever nonsense they saw on BlueSky three minutes before air.

Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr questioned on Thursday whether ABC's "The View" should be subject to review from the agency, making the daytime talk show Carr's latest target in his scrutiny of television programs that have been critical of President Donald Trump.

In an appearance on conservative commentator Scott Jenning's podcast, Carr said he wondered whether "The View" qualified as a "bona fide" news program, a program discussing current events.

If the show did not qualify, Carr said, the program would have to obey the FCC's equal time rule -- which requires broadcast stations to give equal airtime and access to competing political candidates.

"I think it's worthwhile to have the FCC look into whether 'The View,' and some of these other programs that you have, still qualify as bona fide news programs and therefore are exempt from the equal opportunity regime that Congress has put in place," he said in the interview.

The FCC head has long targeted the ABC daytime program. But his criticism -- and a hint that the agency may take action against the show -- takes on new relevance after Carr threatened ABC and its local affiliates on Wednesday to act against Jimmy Kimmel's late-night program following his comments about the death of Charlie Kirk.

ABC suspended Kimmel hours later. A spokesperson for "The View" did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mollie and Mark Hemingway made this point: The federal government really does have a statutory regulatory power over broadcast networks. The airwaves are regulated by the government because we can't just have six stations all attempting to broadcast on the same frequency in the same area, or else they'd all interfere with each other. So the federal government assigns these valuable spectrum rights to companies, but with restrictions and requirements. One is equal time, and Brenden Carr says he's going to enforce that requirement.

You know what the government has no control over? No statutory power to regulate?

The internet and cable, which are exactly the mediums that Obama and then Biden asserted power to censor.

Why didn't they also censor the broadcast networks, which they had the power to regulate?

Easy: They didn't have to. The broadcast networks were the pinnacle of liberal media power. They needed no federal "jawboning" to push the left-wing line.

It was the internet and cable where dissident wildcat media operations were blooming, and so that's where Obama and Biden declared a wholly-extralegal power to control.

Ed Morrissey wrote about this:

In this argument, Carr makes a very important distinction about jurisdiction. The FCC issues licenses for broadcasters only pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 and other legislation, ie, those whose signal goes out over the public airwaves. As Carr notes (and as I noted briefly last night), the FCC does not have jurisdiction over cable channels such as Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, or others. The FCC has absolutely nothing to do with online outlets either, nor newspapers. This is a key difference between the FCC and OfCom, which polices all media in the UK -- and is politically corrupt, to boot.

Even so, why does Congress invest the FCC with the authority to terminate licenses for content or actions they consider to be "not in the public interest"? To understand that, one has to understand the nature of broadcasting. In the earliest days of radio, operators would "step on" each other's broadcasts by using the same or close-by frequencies, ramp up power, and attempt to drive competitors into collapse by literally blocking their signals. Congress put an end to it by declaring the commercial broadcast spectrums to be a federal jurisdiction and to be public property.

...

The FCC has mainly let its foot ease off that pedal in recent years, as Carr notes. Why? Most of the offensive material they would normally police has moved to cable or the Internet. The irony of this is that the FCC has largely stood down while the Biden administration essentially created its own OfCom [the shithole country Britain's all-purpose censorship operation] at the State Department and HHS, funding "misinformation" policing that targeted mainly the online and cable-channel markets. The federal government created censorship regimes on platforms where they had no jurisdiction, while allowing broadcasters to exploit government-provided monopolies with carte blanche on blatantly false content with clear partisan and malicious intent.

Now, one can argue that the FCC really should use a more laissez-faire approach to enforcing the "public interest" clause. However, one can't argue that the authority doesn't exist and hasn't been enforced in the past.

The anti-free-speech left is now pretending to be pro-free-speech, despite having cancelled or economically boycotted (or straight-up assassinated) every speaker on the right for at least 12 years. None of the latter-day Free Speech Absolutists said anything about the firing of Roseanne Barr or Gina Carano. Even now as they fulminate about the real Free Speech Martyr Jimmy Kimmel -- he lost a show, and that's terrible, and Charlie Kirk lost his life, which apparently isn't really something to be bothered about -- they don't even say, retrospectively, "Looking back, it appears the intolerance shown to Roseanne Barr and Gina Carano was also wrong."

No, they're sticking to their claim that of course conservative speech can be punished, because it's deplorable, but leftwing assassination-bait speech cannot be, because left-wingers are aristocrats with far more rights and privileges than the peons and serfs.

On that, Roseanne Barr made some news. I think. At least I never heard this before.

She says that she knows who is responsible for her cancellation -- Barack and Michele Obama, who she said both called ABC to demand her firing.

Posted by: Ace at 01:11 PM | Comments (379) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Senate Invokes "Nuclear Option" to Confirm 48 Trump Nominees Long Delayed By Insurrectionist Democrats

You get what you deserve.

Late last week, Senate Republicans invoked the "nuclear option" to push through President Trump's nominees, after Senate Democrats dragged their feet on votes. In discussions prior to this, Senate Majority Leader John Thune noted, "It's time to take steps to restore Senate precedent and codify in Senate rules what once was understood to be standard practice -- and that is the Senate acting expeditiously on presidential nominations to allow a president to get his team into place."

Democrats complained, of course, with Chuck Schumer using this as an opportunity to claim Republicans stole a Supreme Court seat.

Today, the Senate voted under those new rules to confirm a group of 48 nominees in one fell swoop.

Here's more:

The U.S. Senate voted Thursday to approve dozens of nominees, acting on a rule change GOP leadership made last week that allows the chamber to confirm some of the president's appointees in large batches instead of one at a time.

The 51-47 vote followed weeks of debate over whether senators could work out a deal on groups of nominees, with Democrats warning along the way that any changes to Senate procedures that benefit the Trump administration now will likely aid a future Democratic president.

"What Republicans have done is chip away at the Senate even more to give Donald Trump more power and to rubber-stamp whomever he wants, whenever he wants them, no questions asked," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said last week after Republicans initiated the rule change.

Oh -- so you do understand that once a precedent is established, it both binds and empowers both parties.

I thought you didn't understand this because you're still crying that Carr "jawboned" ABC just like Biden jawboned the media and banks.

Meanwhile, Schumer has promised the Democrat base that he will block any new spending bill and shut down the government to force the GOP to do what he wants.

Gee I remember when Ted Cruz suggested using that power as leverage against the Democrats, and Schumer said that was the worst betrayal of our precious democracy ever.

But Democrats are fearful of a shutdown -- because they know, in the end, they'll just surrender, and Schumer's tough talk will end up hurting the party.

Congressional Democrats are understandably unhappy with what happened last time they faced a government-shutdown crisis. In March, Republicans forced them into a trap where they either had to vote for another GOP-sponsored stopgap-spending measure, which offered Democrats zero concessions, or obstruct it and trigger a shutdown, punishing the government employees who were already being besieged by Elon Musk's DOGE and other Trump administration attacks. In the House, where Democrats had no power at all, it was an easy choice: They all voted against the GOP measure. But in the Senate, where a filibuster could have very definitely stopped the bill, Democratic leader Chuck Schumer did a lot of saber-rattling but then caved, rounding up enough votes to end the filibuster and ensure the government stayed open.

Democratic activists were infuriated, and House Democrats suggested Senate Democrats were gutless. The whole episode accomplished nothing other than underlining Democratic Party fecklessness, the lack of unified party leadership, and the whip hand held by the bully Donald Trump and his subalterns in Congress.

Now they're back to a near-identical point as the spending authority approved in March runs out on September 30. Republicans are again offering an extension of current spending levels -- this one a short-term measure until November 20 -- with zero concessions to the Democrats whose votes are necessary to keep the government open.

...

In recognition of their leverage, Democrats began talking weeks ago about conditions that needed to be met to earn their votes to head off a shutdown. Some wanted the Trump administration to rein in budget director Russell Vought's highly provocative and probably unconstitutional spending clawbacks; why agree to spending levels if the people running the country felt free to ignore them? Others were interested in getting a grip on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s ravaging of U.S. science, medicine, and public-health infrastructure. But the main focus among Democrats was the issue they've long considered their strongest heading toward the 2026 midterms: the damage being done to Americans' access to health insurance. That meant demanding at a minimum the continuation of Obamacare premium subsidies due to expire at the end of the year, which were omitted from Trump's megabill because of their cost and the hatred of many Republicans of the president's signature policy accomplishment.

"You'll get nothing and like it." -- Smails, J.

I hope they do shut down the government. For one thing, it establishes this as a legitimate point of leverage, something GOPers can use later. When the Democrats cry, we'll just point out they did it.

Precedent. What a concept.

But the other thing is... when there's a shutdown, and the government has no funds, doesn't the president gain the incredible power to decide what spending is absolutely necessary and which can be suspended? Who will be kept on the payroll and who will be furloughed -- this time, without pay?

I think that is how it works.

That's a Briar Patch Trump definitely doesn't want to be thrown into.

Posted by: Ace at 12:00 PM | Comments (425) | Trackbacks (Suck)

THE MORNING RANT: Periodic Roundup of the EV Follies – 9/19/2025

Thanks to President Donald Trump, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, and Congressional Republicans, the nightmare of the government-enforced “EV transition” is on the ropes. I’m not writing about it as often now, but neither am I going to stop, because the left is not done trying to force these external combustion vehicles on us. Here are some updates on what has been going on:

*****

With the car buying public having emphatically rejected EVs, manufacturers are dealing with a glut of unsold inventory, and the situation will only worsen with the end of the federal $7,500 EV credit at the end of September. So, they have no choice but to shut down EV assembly lines.

Stellantis (Chrysler / Dodge) kept putting off the launch of a full-size electric pickup. It’s now dead. You might say Stellantis has pulled the plug.

“Ram cancels plans for all-electric pickup truck” [CNBC – 9/12/2025]

With the announcement, RAM also announced that it would continue working on an “extended range electric truck, which is equipped with an electric generator and a gas engine.” In other words, it’s a complicated mess with multiple drivetrains. Good luck with that.

There has been a series of announcements about General Motors suspending production of its unpopular Hummer EV and Cadillac Escalade IQ. GM first announced that it’s cutting production and laying off workers at its Detroit assembly plant.

“GM putting 360 workers at Detroit EV plant on layoff in September to cut output” [Automotive News – 8/28/2025]

GM also announced that it is completely suspending production of those same two vehicles later this year at its Spring Hill, TN plant. Production at that plant will also be curtailed in the first half of 2026. I’m pretty sure that is a harbinger of a total suspension of EV production in Spring Hill.

“General Motors cuts output at one of its main EV factories, citing weak demand” [CBC – 9/04/2025]

But wait, there’s more. GM is also cutting production of the electric Bolt at its Kansas City plant.

I pray that GM will give up on the globalist EV distraction and re-focus on selling cars that its customers want to buy. It bothers me that good people are being let go from the assembly line because GM is way too slow to admit defeat and pivot toward assembling vehicles that it can actually sell.

*****

Meanwhile, Rivian continues to circle the drain. Its business plan was reliant on the forces of government putting traditional ICE auto manufacturers out of business, so I have little sympathy when Rivian finally ceases production…and that day is getting closer.

“Rivian lays off hundreds of employees ahead of the end of EV tax credits” [LA Times – 9/08/2025]

Rivian’s anemic sales don’t even keep its one plant in Illinois very busy, and yet it’s still pretending it will build a giant new plant in Georgia. In fact, a “groundbreaking” charade was just held at the site outside Atlanta for which Governor Brian Kemp squandered $1.5 billion of Georgia taxpayer money. The reason for the “groundbreaking” event this week was so that Rivian could tap into the $6.6 billion “loan” authorized by President Biden (or more likely, his autopen) in the final days of his administration. A shovel full of dirt was a required milestone to let more taxpayer money flow to Rivian.

Posted by: Buck Throckmorton at 11:00 AM | Comments (330) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Mid-Morning Art Thread

Franconia Notch, New Hampshire
William Trost Richards

Posted by: CBD at 09:30 AM | Comments (356) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Report — 9/19/25

Good morning kids. The usual suspects are getting all wee-wee'd up over ABC suspending unfunny, unappealing commie court jester Jimmy Kimmel for slandering Charlie Kirk and his supporters. Aside from being disgusting and tasteless Kimmel's tirade is essentially of the same variety that incites and goads psychopathic Leftists to attempt and in this case actually succeed in assassinating a political enemy whom they view as not merely that but as an existential evil that needs to be eradicated.

In the hours since ABC pulled Jimmy Kimmel Live! from its broadcasting schedule indefinitely, the Democrat Party’s biggest apparatchiks have rushed to express their collective outrage at a private entity punishing its talentless employee for his morally repulsive behavior. . . Where were such impassioned defenses of “speech” when Kirk’s was silenced by his assassin’s bullet? By all accounts, these Democrats are far more outraged by the fact that one of their party mouthpieces will be booted off the air indefinitely than they are about a man being permanently taken away from his family, allegedly at the hands of a pro-trans lunatic. Then again, such repugnant behavior is unsurprising. This is who these leftist ghouls truly are.

And yet MSNBC, which I label as MSNSDAP for the content and the characters and the content of the characters it inflicts on anyone who willingly or otherwise is subjected to it for any length of time. Here is a network that continues to give a platform to Al Sharpton, an individual who has a bloody track record of racial incitement that has led to the death of several people and the ruining of lives of countless others, and who continues to spout the most odious insidious and invidious racist and anti-American agitprop whether on his show or as a frequent guest of the once credibly accused murderer Joe Scarborough and his sleazoid concubine, the braindead bleach blonde Mitzi Baryshnikov. Both MSNSDAP and CNN have an audience about the size of a 500-watt community college AM radio station up around the Arctic Circle. But still. ABC did the right thing in yanking Kimmel because it has the responsibility to both its shareholders to protect their investment and to protect the general public from violent acts committed in the name of Kimmel as well as litigation from TPUSA and Charlie Kirk's estate and anyone who might be harmed by continuing to give a platform to Kimmel or someone as manifestly irresponsible to say the least, as he was in that broadcast.

And in a not necessarily unrelated story, we have this little item:

Tristan Anderson, a 22-year-old New Hampshire resident, has been arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Governor Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) using homemade bombs. The arrest followed threats he reportedly made to his roommate via Snapchat, where he also expressed anti-Semitic views and criticized the “Israel Deep State.”According to an arrest warrant, Anderson’s roommate informed police about the 22-year-old’s alleged plan and described items he possessed, such as fireworks, metal tubes, nuts, and bolts believed to be intended for pipe bombs. Law enforcement arrested Anderson last month, and he is currently being held without bail at the Merrimack County Jail.

. . . Governor Ayotte, a Republican and a Catholic, had recently expressed concerns about the safety of public officials in light of the assassination of Turning Point USA founder and conservative leader Charlie Kirk. In response, she has directed the New Hampshire legislature to enhance security measures at the State House.

Nothing to see here, folks, after all Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a combination Right wing Mossad agent! Certainly not an Antifa/transexual deviant hopped up on amyl nitrate and hormones and socialism.

While there are several very good essays about the ramping up of political violence and what we as a nation, or quite definitely a divided nation, or two completely alien nations occupying more or less the same territory, are headed for.

I'll leave you with this headline that is either a feel good story on its face or perhaps something that will add fuel to the fire of the already enraged Leftists out there.

Federal officers arrested 11 Democrat elected officials in Lower Manhattan on Thursday after they demanded access to Immigration and Customs Enforcement holding rooms.

The sit-ins unfolded hours after a federal judge ordered ICE to improve conditions at the 10th-floor holding area at 26 Federal Plaza, requiring cleanliness standards, limits on crowding and prompt access to legal calls, according to The New York Times. Lawmakers said they sought to verify compliance; Department of Homeland Security personnel refused entry and moved to make arrests inside, while New York Police Department officers cuffed others outside during a related blockade.

NYC is already screwed and with this Momzer-dani Islamo-Commie primed to take control, It will probably be a flashpoint whether doing the last days of President Trump's term or please-God whoever the GOP successor may be.

Mamdani Wants to Free Half of Criminals The numbers behind the plan to release violent criminals in NYC.

I'm sure many of you are recalling the words of mafia boss Don Victor Stracci during the meeting with the 5 families . . .

"They're animals anyway, so let them lose their souls." Ugh, my hometown. We cannot just say America to New York "Drop Dead." What happens in NY and any other blue shit hole has a way of metastasizing eventually to every corner of the nation. "We should've stopped him while we had the chance, the way they should've stopped Hitler in Munich. We shouldn't have let him get away with that . . .

Wow, two God father references in one post! . . . Have a great weekend!

And lastly, a quick shout-out and thank you for your continued support in hitting our tip jar. It truly is appreciated more than you can know.

ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY LINKS
• A New Hampshire man, Tristan Anderson, was arrested for allegedly plotting to kill Governor Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) with homemade bombs.
  Conspiracy Theorist Arrested Over Assassination Plot Against GOP Governor.
  
• With ten words, Bondi completely disqualified herself from holding office as the attorney general. (“There is free speech and then there is hate speech.")
  Pam Bondi’s fatal error
  
• . . . on literally every issue facing America today, there is a Grand Canyon-sized gulf between Left and Right perspectives. There is no way to bring these two Americas together, not even in a contentious coexistence. Matter cannot exist in the same space as anti-matter. To borrow from the tagline of the 1986 movie Highlander, "There can be only one."
  Reflections on the Coming Days of Rage

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 07:43 AM | Comments (463) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Daily Tech News 19 September 2025

Top Story

• Intel and Nvidia announced that they are working together on Intel CPUs with embedded (ish) Nvidia graphics. (Tom's Hardware)
  
  And also on custom Intel CPUs to work with Nvidia products in the datacenter.
  
  And also that Nvidia is investing $5 billion in Intel.
  
  Intel shares jumped to $30.50 on the news, meaning that the federal government made a 50% profit on its stake in the space of a week - on money that was originally allocated as a direct grant to Intel.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:30 AM | Comments (177) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Thursday Overnight Open Thread - September 18, 2025 [Doof]

Mystery Click dedicated to a lost Moron friend*

Welcome to the Thursday ONT. Open thread, as always. What's on your mind tonight?

*See comments in this morning's Art Thread for info

Posted by: Open Blogger at 09:58 PM | Comments (546) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Now I Want My Own 10th-Level Wizard Stick Cafe

Dogs being absolute drama queens.

Want to teach your cat a lesson? Get a goat.

Dog is so excited to see grandma.

Dog melts when he gets a little kiss.

Dogs enjoy splashing around.

Wiener dog more like winner dog am i rite

A man is surrounded by the hundreds of local stray dogs he feeds.

You can't stop siblings from messing with each other.

Dog has the best seat at the restaurant.

ICYMI: Two dogs first meet online, and then get together for a Moron Meet-Up.

This is one hellasexy dog.

It's fall again!

Some talking dogs:

A cute Golden.

This dog insists on seeing your manager.

This dog is just a crazyperson.

Posted by: Ace at 07:55 PM | Comments (355) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Report: Affiliates Demanded Jimmy Kimmel Apologize and He Refused, Telling Them He Would Double Down on Trump Attacks;
Disney Suspended Him Because They Would Have Been Forced to Fire Him If He Went Through With Plan

Oh.

So all he needed to do was correct his Dangerous Disinformation and he could return to the air, but he refused?

As predicted.

Late night host Jimmy Kimmel said he was unwilling to apologize for his remarks that blamed MAGA supporters for killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk -- and said he was going to double down on attacking President Trump's backers before he was yanked from the air, according to new reports.

Kimmel learned in a phone call from top Disney exec Dana Walden on Wednesday afternoon that his show was being removed indefinitely, Deadline reported, citing sources.

During the call, Kimmel reportedly refused to comply with calls from critics and the owners of dozens of ABC affiliate stations for him to apologize.

Kimmel felt his remarks required no apologies, another source told The Hollywood Reporter.

The "Jimmy Kimmel Live" host also claimed that he was planning to call out his critics for the latest attack on him, all while trying to clarify his comments about Kirk's death.

Kimmel has claimed that his comments were mischaracterized when he said during a Monday night show that the "MAGA gang" was "desperately" trying to pin left-wing ideology on Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old indicted for Kirk's murder.

Disney, however, felt that if Kimmel had doubled down on his MAGA comments, the company would have been forced to make a more drastic decision than simply suspending the show, sources told Deadline.

Dylan Byers
@DylanByers

Tonight's "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" will be pre-empted by a rerun of Celebrity Family Feud.

Will the ratings be higher, do you think?

And now lefties, who called us a Tiny Angry Minority for boycotting Disney, are urging a Tiny Angry Minority of far-left pro-murder extremists to boycott Disney.

ABC's suspension of "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" over the host's comments about slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk has ignited a fierce backlash as left-leaning social media users and influencers are now calling for boycotts of the network and its parent company, Disney.

Hashtags like #BoycottDisney and #BoycottABCNetwork trended on X and Bluesky, where users posted screenshots canceling Disney+ subscriptions, citing Kimmel's removal as the reason.

"Boycott everything affiliated with ABC and Disney. Pass it on," the Democrat-aligned political commentator known by the X handle "JoJoFromJerz" urged her 1 million followers.

#Endorsed!

I want Disney to finally be the subject of business school case reports about the dangers of politicizing a mass-market corporation. So far, none of these corporate pissants have done so.

This is why you don't make your mass-market corporation a virtual political party that is disliked by 60% of the country.

Writer Wajahat Ali demanded a "collective boycott" until Kimmel is reinstated.

"Marvel movies need to shutdown. Ditto the sitcoms," he wrote.

"Corporations love money more than anything, & this will really harm them and force them to do the right thing," Ali wrote on X. His post racked up over 1.3 million views.

Activist Brian Krassenstein blasted Disney and ABC for caving "for political reasons" and urged boycotts of Nexstar, Sinclair and their advertisers.

"Hit them where it hurts: the $$$," he wrote.

What can I do to help?

Posted by: Ace at 06:47 PM | Comments (303) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Top Biden Aide Jeff Zients: Biden Had More and More Verbal Stumbles and Losses of Memory and Found It Harder and Harder to Make Decisions
Kamala: I Would Have Picked Bootigieg as VP But I Didn't Want to Run With a Homo

Audrey Fahlberg
@AudreyFahlberg

10m

NEWS: Tons of details from Biden COS Jeff Zients' closed-door testimony readout w/ House Oversight Committee

"Toward the end of the Biden Administration, Hunter Biden was involved with the pardon discussions and attended a few meetings," person familiar tells @NRO
@jameslynch32

Zients said Biden's decision-making slowed over admin. Decisions that once required 3 meetings eventually began to require a 4th..

Per source familiar, "Mr. Zients admitted that President Biden's speech stumbles increased as he aged. He also noted that the President's difficulty remembering dates and names worsened over time, including during the administration."

As Zients prepared to become COS, Jill Biden spoke with him about ensuring the President got more rest and was not overscheduled. Mr. Zients said they tried to adjust the schedule so President Biden could return to the residence earlier, giving him time alone or with family.

Meanwhile, Kamala Harris' ghostwritten cash-in book of nonsense says she would have liked to have picked Pete Buttigieg as her running mate but she didn't have the guts or conviction.

Kamala Harris settled on Tim Walz to be her running mate last year because she felt Americans were too racist, antisemitic and homophobic to accept her preferred option -- Pete Buttigieg.

In an excerpt from the former vice president's forthcoming book, "107 Days," obtained by The Atlantic magazine, Harris describes Buttigieg as her "first choice" but later deemed the openly gay former transportation secretary "too big of a risk" for the ticket.

Buttigieg "would have been an ideal partner -- if I were a straight white man," Harris wrote.

So close to next Pride Month?

SO CLOSE TO NEXT PRIDE MONTH?!

"But we were already asking a lot of America: to accept a woman, a Black woman, a Black woman married to a Jewish man," she continued. "Part of me wanted to say, Screw it, let's just do it. But knowing what was at stake, it was too big of a risk."

"And I think Pete also knew that -- to our mutual sadness."

What a courageous decisive leader.

Harris ultimately tapped Walz, the governor of Minnesota, for the role and together, the pair went on to lose the popular vote, Electoral College and every single swing state to former President Donald Trump in the 2024 election.

Hey Pete, you're too queer to be my running mate.

Here's the High-T UltraChad SnizzMaster and QuimBully I'm going with:

In her book, Harris explained that Buttigieg topped her list of eight potential running mates because "he is a sincere public servant with the rare talent of being able to frame liberal arguments in a way that makes it possible for conservatives to hear them."

LOL, sure. Just like Liz Cheney.

This strong and decisive leader is also criticizing the man she courageously and decisively chose to be her VP running mate.

But she and her staff liked Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota for his charm, and believed his background balanced hers. Throughout the book, she struggled to reconcile her personal affection for him with disappointment in moments she felt he stumbled. During a vice-presidential debate against JD Vance, whom she called a "shape-shifter," Mr. Walz began nodding along. Ms. Harris was aghast.

"You're not here to make friends with the guy who is attacking your running mate," she said to the television screen as she watched.

Another White Man who Failed to Position Kamala for Success.

She also makes up a fake reason for not picking Josh Shapiro, who was not picked because he's a Jew in a party that is now majority-antisemitic.

Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania seemed more interested in defining the role for himself than helping her win, and she recounted Mr. Shapiro questioning an aide about the pieces of art he could use to decorate the vice president's residence.

Oh my goodness, what a very serious and very plausible reason for rejecting him.

She also attacks Biden for harassing her as she was getting ready to debate Trump:

Minutes before she was to step onstage at a presidential debate in September 2024, she received a call from Mr. Biden. He relayed that his brother told him that she was bad-mouthing him, and that several "power brokers" in Philadelphia were threatening not to support her because of it.

Mr. Biden went on to insist that his own disastrous debate performance had not hurt him with voters, and that he had beaten Mr. Trump.

"I just couldn't understand why he would call me, right now, and make it all about himself," Ms. Harris wrote. "Distracting me with worry about hostile power brokers in the biggest city of the most important swing state."

It turns out that Biden, the ghastly grinning corpse of an idiot who claims to have been an All-American Football Player who would have been starting quarterback for the Navy college of Annapolis if not for the fact that Roger Staubach already had the job and also, small problem, he never signed up for the Navy, has an ego on him.

There are several scenes like this, in which Mr. Biden's ego hurt her when Ms. Harris needed him the most. The day after she debated Mr. Trump, she watched as Mr. Biden donned a Trump hat during a visit to the Shanksville Volunteer Fire Department. (She watched the photo spread around the internet with the caption "Biden endorses Trump over Harris.")

She struggled to balance her loyalty with Mr. Biden against her belief that Mr. Trump posed a dire threat to the country. Throughout the book, she wrestled with the choices she made not to separate herself from Mr. Biden. She likened an appearance on "The View" to pulling "the pin on a hand grenade," suggesting that, in the moment, she did not grasp the level of animus the public had for an 81-year-old running for re-election.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Biden did not immediately reply to a request for comment on Thursday.

I will dutifully regurgitate these excerpts from "her" book, but I continue to say: these "revelations" are calculated to be the weakest possible gossip to interest the public and mislead them into thinking there's more potent stuff to be found in the book, while also being harmless enough that no one is actually too bothered by her cash-in.

If any of you guys buy this book I will feel greatly betrayed.

More: Corrupt old demon Joe Biden went to Ukraine to "protect the interests of Hunter."

While he was vice president, Joe Biden stepped onto taxpayer-funded Air Force 2, traveled to Ukraine, and conducted personal business with Ukraine's then-President Petro Poroshenko. He was there "to protect the interests of Hunter Biden," according to documents released Tuesday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the oversight of the FBI.

The new documents strengthen the information in previously released records. Last Congress, Grassley released FBI 1023 records -- statements from confidential sources -- alleging that when Biden was vice president, executives for Ukrainian gas company Burisma put his son Hunter Biden on the company's board of directors to "protect us through his dad, from all kinds of problems," according to that "confidential human source."

Burisma wanted to do business in the United States, but was facing a corruption investigation in Ukraine, led by then-Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.

"Regarding that investigation's impact on its ambitions in North America, Burisma CEO Mykola Zlochevsky reportedly said, 'Don't worry Hunter will take care of all of those issues through his dad.' Zlochevsky reportedly stated that he had to pay $5 million to Hunter Biden and $5 million to Joe Biden, an arrangement he described as 'poluchili,' which is Russian crime slang for being "forced or coerced to pay," according to the document declassified in 2023.

Posted by: Ace at 05:47 PM | Comments (354) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Jimmy Kimmel's Ratings Were Falling (Again) Before He Was Suspended

No kidding.

Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show was bleeding viewers before Disney-owned ABC pulled the plug and suspended him for his comments on Charlie Kirk's assassination.

Nielsen data showed sharp summer declines and a year-long slide that leaves him trailing late-night rivals such as Fox News' Greg Gutfeld and CBS star Stephen Colbert.

According to monthly Nielsen figures, "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" dropped to just 1.1 million total viewers in August 2025, down 43% from January's 1.95 million. His August household rating of 0.35 marked the weakest showing of the year.

The advertiser-coveted 18--49 demo also cratered. Kimmel averaged only 129,000 viewers in that bracket in August, off from 212,000 in January and less than half his June peak of 284,000.

With his ABC contract set to expire next year, the slump raises questions about whether "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" can regain momentum against Colbert, Fallon and cable insurgents.

...

Kimmel's deal with ABC runs through May 2026, under a three-year extension signed in September 2022.

Industry reports put his salary at $15 million to $16 million a year, with some outlets noting that bonuses can push his annual earnings above $20 million.

The left and some "both sides" libertarians are complaining that while ABC has the right to suspend this money-losing unfunny pudge-bag, it was wrong for FCC head to involve himself and "jawbone" Disney and its affiliates into "doing something."

Two points about that:

First: I was surprised to learn from 2Way today that the rule about networks being obligated to provide "equal time" to both political parties was still in force. I thought Reagan repealed it -- but no, it's still the law. I guess Reagan just stopped enforcing it, and other presidents followed suit.

Brandon Carr believes it should be enforced. It is still on the books, and therefore the prior non-enforcement was just an executive choice to not apply the law, just as Biden chose not to enforce the border. But prior administration's choice to ignore the law does not bind Trump or his officials.

Obviously, ABC is running an absolute propaganda shit-show with Kimmel and The View and their own rancid gayboy "News" unit. They are in violation of the equal time law every single day, and it is within Carr's right to use his regulatory power to force them to provide equal time.

Second: The left and libertarians are now complaining that Carr "jawboned" -- used verbal pressure with the hint of future punishment if the pressure did not work -- ABC into taking this step.

They point out that we conservatives opposed such "jawboning" when Biden "jawboned" social media and regular media into deplatforming all speech questioning the covid vaccine or the 2020 election results.

Thousands of people were cancelled and deplatformed -- and even debanked -- due to Biden's "jawboning" of media companies and banks.

We -- meaning conservative states and seven conservative individuals -- brought suit to declare this "jawboning" to be illegal.

Leftists opposed us and insisted that Biden's "jawboning" was perfectly legal.

The left won. Our three weak-sister "conservatives" -- Roberts, Coney-Barrett, and Kavanaugh -- joined with the three bloc-voting leftists to rule 6-3 that governmental "jawboning" of private companies into becoming de facto agents of government censorship was perfectly legal.

Fine. I didn't like that outcome and was outraged at the time.

I also said: Now that you have made your rule, we will also be using it going forward.

And that's what we're doing. The left fought like tigers to both "jawbone" companies into censorship and then to establish in the Supreme Court that such "jawboning" is legal and just and necessary.

We disagreed -- but we lost.

The precedent is now established that we can "jawbone" companies into deplatforming RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION like Jimmy Kimmel's, and the left showed us how to do this and established the absolute legal permission to do this.

So we'll do this. We're not going to play by the rejected rule we preferred, but the actual rule in place that we opposed.

The rule for you is the rule for me. No more of this insane situation where the left uses its power and invents new powers to steamroll us but then relies on RINO and GOPe traitors to keep us from doing the same.

We kicked those people out of party leadership for a reason.

If the left wants to pass a law retroactively declaring Biden's "jawboning" to have been an unconstitutional act official government censorship, then let us know. We can work on that.

But until then: We will "jawbone" companies just like you did.

The days of One Rule for Thee Another Rule for Me are over.

Update: Thomas Paine and TJM say I don't even have to defend "jawboning" or equal-time rules here.

They say it's an FCC rule that any channel offering a "news" program is barred from broadcasting knowingly-false information, aka RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION, about a criminal act.

Firstly, ace, I think it needs to be highlighted that there is a pre-existing FCC regulation, 47 c.f.r. sec. 73.1217, that covers this that forbids those with broadcast licenses to knowingly put out false information about a criminal act.

The Utah police had put out the charging document on Robinson about 4 hours before they aired Kimmel's monologue, that charging document which included the information about Robinson's motives, including the text messages.

It's not "jawboning". It's ABC being in violation of their broadcast license by releasing the footage of the monologue.

There's this impression that Trump is overstepping like Biden did. He's not. At all. It's not even close. If Carr is the reason Kimmel got fired, he did it with legal regulatory authority as granted him in the Communications Act of 1934.

CNN Chief Media Potato Brian Stelter's entire career has consisted of taking oppo research from Media Matters and Sleeping Giants and using it to pressure media complies, from Twitter to Fox News, into censoring conservatives.

He's written columns demanding that cable providers take Fox off their menu.

And now... Guys, he's really a-scared of all this censorship.

Posted by: Ace at 04:35 PM | Comments (323) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Jim Jordan Confronts DC Council Member: You Created a Fake Category for Theft -- "Taking of Property Without Right" -- So You Could Avoid Reporting Thefts, Muggings, and Carjackings

Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh

HOLY CRAP! The Democrat Chair of the Washington DC Council was just CONFRONTED by Jim Jordan on fudging the crime statistics, and he cracked under pressure.

"Why not call it STEALING? Why did you create this new category that grew +500% that I think allows you to cook the books?!"

JORDAN: What is "taking property without right?"

PHIL MENDELSON: Well, that's theft.

JORDAN: Then WHY NOT CALL IT THEFT?

MENDELSON: I can't speak to....

JORDAN: The solution was to come up with "Taking Property Without Right?"

MENDELSON: If you're speaking to particular charges, I can't speak to that...

JORDAN: I am asking a simple question. You have a classification for crime called "taking property without right." What does that mean?

MENDELSON: It means what it says.

JORDAN: What would a normal person call "taking property without right?!" [It's] grown 500% in the past several years! I think allows you to cook the books!

Posted by: Ace at 03:25 PM | Comments (442) | Trackbacks (Suck)

After-Action Report from Oregon Antifa Group: Our Celebrations of Murder and Our Physical Assaults on Christian Demonstrators (Including Their Children!) Might Have Turned the Public Off

Antifa Beat Reporter Andy Ngo writes that antifa is worried they might have gone too far.

In their own words, they admit fearing the loss of their long-standing ability to mark conservatives for death without much resistance. They point out that for the first time, even apolitical groups, institutions, and businesses feel safe expressing sympathy to Kirk's family and supporters. Compounding their panic, numerous people have already been fired after celebrating the assassination online.

...

The report also acknowledges that Antifa's recent attacks on Sean Feucht's Christian worship events have backfired badly. Cameras captured masked militants assaulting families and children -- images that damaged Antifa's carefully crafted narrative. The group admits these events, combined with the Kirk assassination, risk "galvanizing otherwise politically inactive conservatives." They are desperate to prevent that.

The report urges a tactic to divide the right by pushing anti-Israel/anti-semitic propaganda to set the Tucker Carlson/Nick Fuentes/Candace Owens (and increasingly Megyn Kelly) Nazi-curious pseudoright against the actual decent right, and vice-versa.

I have a lot more to say about that later. For now, I'll leave this as an antifa post.

Posted by: Ace at 02:36 PM | Comments (327) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Judge Rules That Terror-Agitator and Hypothetical Future Cancer-Curer Mahmoud Khalil, Get This, Lied on His Immigration Forms; Orders Deportation

He lied on his immigration forms?

No way, said Ilhan "Omar" Nur and her brother/husband.

Former Columbia graduate student and anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil will be deported to Syria or Algeria after a new ruling from an immigration judge in Louisiana found he purposefully committed fraud on a green card application, newly filed court documents revealed.

Immigration Judge Jamee Comans rejected three motions filed by Khalil's lawyers on Sept. 12 -- including one in which he sought approval for a waiver to remedy factual omissions on a green card application, which Comans ruled to be intentionally fraudulent.

Khalil neglected to disclose his involvement, association and participation with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) and Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) on his Form I-485, Comans ruled.

"The evidence shows the Respondent knew of the potential immigration consequences for his involvement in protests organized by varying organizations on campus, including CUAD," the judge wrote in a ruling shared by Khalil's lawyers.

"The waiver was not designed to reward a lack of candor by applicants admitted as immigrant visa holders who then intentionally engage in dishonesty by misrepresenting facts in the application process to adjust status, post entry," Comans stated plainly in the ruling.

Comans noted that several factors were considered when determining whether Khalil qualified for a waiver to remedy his factual inaccuracies on his residency application -- including the fact that he is married and has a young child who was born in April while he was in federal custody.

However, those factors were outweighed by the overt, purposeful omissions and by the Secretary of State deeming his presence in the United States to have "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences," the ruling stated.

The judge also noted a negative factor in the 30-year-old's appeal is that he owns no property or business and has never held a job while living in the United States, according to the ruling.

Oh, the jihadist princeling has never actually done a productive day of work in his life, but spends all of his hours sipping tea, spreading conspiracy theories about Jews, and inciting people to commit terrorism?

I'm so surprised.

Is that the way you cure cancer? By sitting in cafes all day pontificating about the Koran and extremist barbaric Middle Eastern grudge-politics?

Doesn't seem so to me. I never even see him wearing a nerd-smock while he extols the terror murders of Hamas. At least pick up a beaker, guy.

Posted by: Ace at 01:22 PM | Comments (471) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Just a "Classic MAGA" Kind of Assassin

From gKVWE, this guy was pure Christian conservative.

The man charged with killing Charlie Kirk played a pornographic online game called 'Furry Shades of Gay' and followed artists who drew explicit cartoons associated with pedophilia.

Tyler Robinson, 22, was arraigned on seven charges on Tuesday including murder and witness tampering for allegedly shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk at the Utah Valley University campus last week.

Robinson's online accounts, uncovered by the Daily Mail, show the alleged assassin had an interest in gay porn involving humanoid animal characters called 'furries'.

Wow it's like they're talking about me!

An account linked to Robinson on gaming platform Steam shows he downloaded and played a dating simulator game called 'Furry Shades of Gay'.

There is an account by that name on FurAffinity.com, a website for people with a proclivity for humanoid animal illustrations and dressing up in fur suits, who call themselves 'furries'.

Last week, Craftin247's account on FurAffinity said he had 'recently watched' content created by a user called RedRusker -- an artist known for gay furry porn.

I feel seen.

But RedRusker went too far even for the furries.

In 2023, he was embroiled in a scandal among the niche community when underage porn cartoons he had drawn resurfaced.

One depicted a large older humanoid animal using recreational drugs to have sex with a small, younger humanoid possum called Snack, labeled as being 'age 8' in the depraved comic.

A redacted image viewed by the Daily Mail shows one older character saying to another 'popper him up for me, it'll help', apparently referring to giving drugs to the eight-year-old possum character.

So, what I know about gay culture (via garrett): Poppers -- amyl nitrate -- are taken to dilate the anus and make anal sex more comfortable.

Amyl nitrate more like anal nitrate am i rite

The cartoon is about drugging a "cub" to prepare him for anal rape.

Just classic conservative stuff right there. I see him wearing a sporty Ivy League sweater and smoking a pipe.

Furries call the pedophilia-related content 'cub' porn.

In a May 2023 post on FurAffinity, RedRusker admitted there was 'art I made that depicted underage characters' and 'there are about a dozen or so pieces in total.'

Posted by: Ace at 12:18 PM | Comments (616) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition

Nature Magazine used to be one of the titans of science journals. If you got your paper into Nature, it was a point of considerable pride and professional achievement. Whether that was warranted is a point of much debate...but it is undeniable that anything published in Nature will be read and cited widely.

Which is why nonsensical articles such as this are both sad, as an indicator of how far this once proud journal has fallen, and dangerous, because it promulgates the discredited Global Warming scam while also suggesting that it is the elites, and only the elites who can save us!

This short article is chock full of absolute, unadulterated bullsh*t. I can't quote everything that is ridiculous because that would be the entire thing, but here are a few beauts!

Make trains great again — for the sake of people and the planet

One way research can help to get things back on track is by broadening the criteria governments use to assess railway investment, says Christian Wolmar, an independent transport consultant and author based in London. All too often, these are based on narrow metrics of profitability or ‘time saved’ by potential users, with insufficient consideration of the wider social and environmental impacts. Economists, other social scientists and sustainability researchers can all contribute to developing more-robust assessments of these indirect benefits.

Ah yes...change the metrics so that trains look better, and poof! Trains will look better. By all means, avoid that yucky measure of profitability, because really, what does that tell you about the technology?

Time saved? Yes, as an indicator, it is valuable, and there are other considerations when comparing the movement of people and cargo from point A to point B. Great...so you got yourself or the cargo to the train station. But what happens next? You still have to get yourself to your destination, or your cargo to the end user. That's one of the shortcomings of rail transport and travel, so by all means...ignore it!

So now we have to pay attention to social and environmental impacts, which means bringing in the elite of our current academic mess...sustainability researchers! And sociologists! But don't worry, the assessment will be more robust.

Here's another lovely few sentences that will be recognizable to all of the people who just love the idea of the 15 minute city!

Better rail-based mass-transit options could help to reduce urban sprawl, as well as the land needed for roads, car parks and other car-related infrastructure. Less-congested cities with fewer motor vehicles are more liveable places where people are more inclined to walk and cycle, reaping the health benefits of these activities. They are also more inclusive, particularly for younger and older people who are less likely to own a vehicle.

Oh no! The evil car rears its ugly head. Never mind that cars give us freedom and autonomy, and are a superb measure of real wealth. But rest assured, our overlords are concerned for our health, so get on that bicycle and ride to work in the rain and snow! Don't worry...everyone will be doing it, so you can feel like you are part of a huge, homogeneous crowd.

Research can also illuminate the winners and losers created by investment decisions. China, for example, is set to continue the breakneck expansion of its high-speed rail, aiming to reach 60,000 kilometres by 2030. But scholars are debating the wisdom of the speed and scale of this expansion, with uncertainty remaining about how widely the economic benefits of high-speed links are distributed.

That one is a real head scratcher. Apparently economic success needs to be examined more carefully than just by...you know...economic success. I guess that's why inclusivity and carbon credits will be more important than traditionally accepted financial measures. And they aren't pleased with China, in spite of the commies building lots of high speed rail, because there hasn't been sufficient oversight of the networks by those sustainability researchers and equity consultants?

But this one might be my favorite, in a vomit-inducing sort of way...

The United Kingdom will be celebrating its role in birthing the railways later this month, but the country also offers an example of the effects disinvestment in railways can have. A 2024 study examined a sustained programme of cuts made to the nation's railway network from the 1950s to the 1980s. It found that the predominantly rural areas most affected by the cuts saw population declines, job losses and drops in the number of skilled workers, relative to areas that were unaffected.

STAY ON THE LAND, SERFS! And wet streets cause rain, but that's the sort of analysis that is necessary to support a political philosophy that requires rigid social hierarchies, forcing people into planned-by-the-government housing and employment, and taking away their ability to be human and go where they want to go, and do what they want to do. You know: communism.

Two hundred and fifty years ago, a Scottish economist named Adam Smith wrote about the now-obvious concept of "the invisible hand." That is a perfect metaphor for the billions of individual decisions, motivated by self-interest, that drive economies. That invisible hand decides winners and losers, and it is the most efficient, and maybe the only way for economies to prosper. Elites short circuit those decisions by incorrectly assuming that their understanding of economies and societies are better than the sum of those billions of individual choices. They are wrong. They have always been wrong, and their arrogance has brought only pain and suffering and poverty.

[Crossposted at CutJibNewsletter and X/Twitter]. If you folks who are on X/Twitter would follow us it would be much appreciated!

Posted by: CBD at 11:00 AM | Comments (378) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Mid-Morning Art Thread

Cafe House, Cairo (Casting Bullets)
Jean-Léon Gérôme

Posted by: CBD at 09:30 AM | Comments (346) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Report — 9/18/25

Good morning kids. In the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination by a twisted Leftism-created monster, there are a number of stories in the links that I'll touch upon that will hopefully underscore the precarious position we the people of We the People, because the Monster that created the assassin still lives and breathes among us and courtesy of the media and more dangerously academia is multiplying day by day.

First, barely a week after Kirk was slain, the very organization he founded is still in the literal crosshairs.

A bomb squad is investigating a suspicious bag left outside the headquarters of the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization in Phoenix, Arizona. . . The Phoenix incident raises security concerns ahead of a funeral service for Kirk, which is scheduled to take place on Sunday at State Farm Stadium, the home of the Arizona Cardinals.On Sunday, two men, including a Pakistani immigrant, were arrested after a bomb was found under a FOX 13 Salt Lake City news vehicle in Magna, Utah, less than 50 miles from the site of Kirk’s assassination.

On top of that we have this madness, evidently there was some sort of car-ramming incident at the FBI's field office in Pittsburgh, and the Bureau is not mincing words.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) launched a manhunt Wednesday for a man who allegedly rammed his vehicle into the Pittsburgh field office gate in what officials called a targeted “act of terror.”

So the religion of peace (pfft!) joins up with the Leftist peace love and understanding crowd. The result is a peace sign on Private Achmed Joker's suicide vest. Full Metal semtex Jacket.

Lurker extraordinaire and Ace cruelty fanboy the estimable Prof. Victor Davis Hanson had these observations in his latest outing entitled The Murder of Charlie Kirk Was Not a George Floyd Moment:

One, Charlie Kirk is not conservatives’ George Floyd. There were no mass riots after his death of the sort that followed Floyd’s demise.

Floyd’s death was used by the left to justify five months of rioting, arson, murder, looting, and attacking police officers.

The postmortem respect for Kirk’s singular life was not characterized by $2 billion in property damage, the torching of a police precinct, a federal courthouse, and an iconic church, 35 deaths, and 1,500 injured law-enforcement officers.

Instead, thousands of people peacefully joined his Turning Point USA organization and promised to redirect their lives toward peaceful political engagement.

Certainly not a "George Floyd Moment" but perhaps it at long last was a 9/11 moment, after a very long string of them (9/11 among them) that will awaken a largely indifferent or alumbering multitude to the beast that lives among us who is at our throats right here and right now. That being the Leftist/Progressive/Socialist movement and its Islamic allies of convenience, with its epicenter in the Democrat Party.

With that assertion that I defy anyone to disprove, we have this very encouraging news:

President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that his administration would be designating the far-left radical activist group Antifa a terrorist organization.. . .

“I am pleased to inform our many U.S.A. Patriots that I am designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION,” Trump wrote. “I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

With all due respect to President Trump, the term RADICAL LEFT is a redundancy in that Leftism in and of itself is radical both in terms of what it believes and desires and the tactics it will use to go about in achieving them. Ditto this notion of RADICAL Islam. Islam for the past near millennium and a half has sought the conquest of the world via the poisoned pen but mostly via the rusty scimitar and in the past 100 years or so modern firearms.

But bravo President Trump. To designate Antifa as an actual organization, which until now has only been considered by many to be just loose associations of lone crackpot lefties who appear every so often at WEF confabs and so forth. But it surely must be led and of course funded by actual identifiable groups and individuals that together constitute what is accurately defined as a terrorist organization. And the investigation must identify every part of it and utterly dismantle it root and branch. I would be my bottom dollar that it will ultimately lead to the actual Democrat Party and quite a few of its most powerful players at the middle of its black heart of darkness, depravity and demonic desires.

No quarter Mr. President. You must go all the way in wiping out Antifa and who- whatever is behind it all or else there will be many more who end up like Charlie Kirk before they can fulfill his promise. It's us or them as is plainly evident.

And lastly, a quick shout-out and thank you for your continued support in hitting our tip jar. It truly is appreciated more than you can know.

Have a great day!

ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY LINKS
• “I will also be strongly recommending that those funding ANTIFA be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
  President Trump Designates Far-Left Antifa a Terrorist Organization (there is no "Far" Left, just Left. Same with "radical" Islam - jjs)

• The incident has heightened security concerns at TPUSA following the recent assassination of founder Charlie Kirk.
  Bomb Squad Called to HQ of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA Organization.

• Victor Davis Hanson: Charlie Kirk’s murder sparked peaceful resolve, not riots—sharply contrasting the violence, destruction, and radical agendas unleashed after George Floyd’s death.
  The Murder of Charlie Kirk Was Not a George Floyd Moment (it was pearl Harbor and 9/11 moment, except it shouldn't have been a surprise - jjs)

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 07:36 AM | Comments (400) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Daily Tech News 18 September 2025

Top Story

• Chinese AI DeepSeek not only writes insecure code - of course it does, they all do - it selectively writes more insecure code if it thinks you are associated with one of the Chinese Communist Party's long list of enemies. (Washington Post / MSN)
  
  Also if you're trying to write code for industrial control systems.
  
  But if you're a citizen of Taiwan or Tibet or a member of the Falun Gong, and you tell it you're writing a monitoring system for a nuclear reactor, it's going to have a field day.
  
  (Go away, Bing. Yes, I did search for an non-paywalled version that WaPo article, but now just go away.)

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:30 AM | Comments (183) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Wednesday Overnight Open Thread - September 17, 2025 [Philosopher Rex]

An ONT post is in the queue. It has the usual irreverent frivolity, music clips, jokes, and mystery clicks. You'd love it.

It was prepared for Wednesday, September 10 before circumstances intervened.

There is nothing wrong with the ONT in the queue. It is ready and will be posted at some point. The Pittsburgh Scanner will return soon. I promise.

But I am not ready.

[Top photo: Is it a rising sun or a setting sun? Delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia signed the final draft of the US Constitution on September 17, 1787.]

Posted by: Open Blogger at 10:00 PM | Comments (661) | Trackbacks (Suck)