July 23, 2024
Some prominent Democratic donors are balking at contributing to Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential bid, suggesting she'd never beat Donald Trump because she's too unpopular. Big money donors have quietly advised promising candidates -- who they view as the future of the party -- including Maryland Governor Wes Moore, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, and Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo to hold their powder and let Harris clinch the democratic nomination. Sources told The Post it is "impossible" for anyone besides Harris to get the nomination given the decision has to be made in mere weeks. These people add that it would be "suicide" to try and mount a challenge at this point since President Biden has anointed Harris as his successor. One deep-pocketed donor told The Post he does not believe any Democrat can win in 2024 -- and that it makes sense for Harris to take the fall on some of Biden's most unpopular positions like immigration. The source dismissed the idea that Harris would push Democrats to victory, "It's the same ticket ... it's over for both of them [Biden and Harris]." The person added that he and other donors will lay low the rest of 2024 and instead focus on supporting candidates they believe can win in 2028. Other mega donors are opening up publicly on X about their concerns over Harris' political stances. "You have to be enthusiastic or hoping for a political appointment to be asking friends for money. I am neither. It's others turn now," deep-pocketed donor John Morgan wrote on X, hours after Biden announced he was dropping out of the 2024 race. "The donors holding the 90 million can release those funds in the morning. It's all yours. You can keep my million. And good luck," added Morgan, a Florida personal injury lawyer, referring to the group of party contributors who recently refused to allow their donated money to be used to fuel what was widely seen as Biden's doomed bid. Morgan previously donated $1 million to the former Biden-Harris campaign. He said he sees Biden's endorsement of his controversial second-in-command as the president's revenge. "Joe Biden's endorsement of Kamala is his f--k you to all who pushed him out," Morgan wrote. "Be careful what you wish for."That said, some polls -- which are often the props of strippers -- suggest that Kamala is enjoying a big "honeymoon" boost.
InteractivePollsAnother poll shows Trump out with a solid five point lead:
@IAPolls2022 NATIONAL POLL: Yahoo/YouGov Harris: 46% [+1]
Trump: 46% [-1] [+/- change vs July 1]
Trump: 43%
Harris: 41%
RFK Jr: 5%
Other: 4%
nteractivePollsThis is a Pennsylvania-sized tasty treat that's fun to eat:
@IAPolls2022 2024: FAU/@MainStUSApolls
Trump: 49% (+5)
Harris: 44%
Trump: 45% (+6)
Harris: 39%
RFK Jr: 9%
Other: 3%
-
Decision Desk HQWe won't have a good idea of what the real public sentiment is until a week after the Democrat convention. Expect a lot of different poll numbers until the end of August, when they'll stabilize. Hopefully in our favor. Update: Trump's pollster says the same that I did -- this is the "Honeymoon" phase, and we'll have to wait a month to see where the polls finally stabilize. I don't mind polls showing Harris doing okay right now. I want Democrats to think that she's their best option, because she's one of their weakest possible choices. First of all, as Ethan Van Sciver put it, she's a "ding-a-ling." She's a "giggling idiot," someone else called her. Brit Hume, if I remember correctly (which I probably don't). She will not wear well. Especially when she gets caught slurring-drunk at 3pm in the afternoon again. She will fall out of the Rum-and-Coke-anut tree again. Second of all, she is the Democrat most bound to Biden's disastrous presidency apart from Biden. Other Democrats could step in and simply disown Biden's record, saying that they would have, in some vague way, "done things differently." As an aide to the cynical flake liberal Mitt Romney said, they would just "shake the Etch-a-Sketch" and start fresh. But Kamala can't do that -- in order to claim she's qualified for the job at all, she'll have to lie and claim she was an "important part" of the Biden administration and decision-making. But the more she does that, they more she smears herself with Biden's many, many failures. She is hardcore on all the woke sh!t people are finally admitting they hate, from open borders to donating to BLM and encouraging the riots to continue. Finally, this is the wrong time for a DEI candidate. 2008-2013 was, of course, the right time for a DEI candidate. But the nation is waking up to the DEI scam and all the failures, disasters, and deaths it creates.
@DecisionDeskHQ DDHQ Polling Average Update: 2024 Presidential (Pennsylvania) Donald Trump (R): 49.0% (+4.6)
Kamala Harris (D): 44.4% This is R+0.3% since last week. This average is based on 7 polls.
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 02:20 PM | Comments (578) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Remember, transitioning cures all of your mental illnesses. It's like using sage-smoke to drive out the Gender Binary Demons in your brain!!!
Note that this son, who now LARPs as a girl, is still alive. Musk says transgenderism "killed my son," but he means this in the sense that the cult of transgenderism stole the son and replaced him with an angry, confused, synthetic-hormone-riddled wreck.Tesla CEO Elon Musk believes his estranged transgender child was "killed by the woke mind virus" after he was tricked into giving his consent for puberty blockers. The 53-year-old billionaire vowed to "destroy" the "incredibly evil" culture that allows the gender-reassignment surgery that his 20-year-old child Vivian Jenna Wilson, who was born Xavier, got in 2022. "I was essentially tricked into signing documents for one of my older boys, Xavier," the X owner told psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson in a Daily Wire interview. "This is before I had any understanding of what was going on. COVID was going on, so there was a lot of confusion and I was told Xavier might commit suicide if he doesn't..." Peterson suggested it "was a lie right from the outset" because there was no clinical evidence to supporting the claim. "It's incredibly evil, and I agree with you that the people that have been promoting this should go to prison," Musk stated firmly. Described the process as "incredibly evil," Musk said it was never explained to him the puberty blockers were "actually just sterilization drugs." "I was tricked into doing this," Musk said. "I lost my son, essentially. They call it 'deadnaming' for a reason. The reason they call it 'deadnaming' is because your son is dead. My son, Xavier, is dead -- killed by the woke mind virus." The SpaceX founder -- who boasts a net worth of nearly $200 billion -- said he was making it his mission to stamp out the gender-reassignment procedure for kids in the wake of his child's transition. "I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that," he said. "And we're making some progress." Vivian, one of six kids Musk shares with his ex-wife Justine Wilson, made headlines in 2022 when she petitioned a California court to change her name and gender. In the court filing, she also requested to take her mother's last name to lose any association with her famous father, saying she "no longer lives with or wishes to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form."
Closely related:
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:16 PM | Comments (481) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The DEI disaster Cheatle was pushed out of her job, finally. It was the Democrats calling her resignation who forced her out, of course. These government incompetents never resign when a Republican demands it. And there's an element of "it's not the crime, it's the cover-up." Congressmen, including Democrats, objected to her empty repetition of the mantra "the buck stops with me" while she simultaneously showed up for a hearing she had four days to prepare for with no answers. Many she did not know (or claimed not to know them), others she admitted she knew, but refused to say.
U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned Tuesday in the wake of mounting pressure following the assassination attempt on former President Trump, Fox News confirmed. Fox News reviewed the letter Cheatle sent to the U.S. Secret Service Tuesday morning, just a day after she taking bipartisan heat during testimony before the House Oversight Committee Monday and over a week after a would-be assassin Thomas Crooks attempted to take the life of Trump at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. "To the Men and Women of the U.S. Secret Service, The Secret Service's solemn mission is to protect our nation's leaders and financial infrastructure," Cheatle wrote in a letter to the agency. "On July 13th, we fell short on that mission." Cheatle said that the "scrutiny" over the last week "has been intense and will continue to remain as our operational tempo increases." "As your Director, I take full responsibility for the security lapse," she wrote.Did he say it, Fox News, or did one of his staffers issue a statement in his name?
Kimberly Cheatle testifies before the House Oversight and Accountability Committee ... Biden, who did not fire Cheatle in the 10 days since the shooting, said he is "grateful to Director Kim Cheatle for her decades of public service," and that he will appoint a new director soon. "As a leader, it takes honor, courage, and incredible integrity to take full responsibility for an organization tasked with one of the most challenging jobs in public service," Biden said. "We all know what happened that day can never happen again. As we move forward, I wish Kim all the best."
"I love this agency, our mission, and the great men and woken who sacrifice so much every day," she wrote. "I have, and will always, put the needs of this agency first." "In light of recent events, it is with a heavy heart that, I have made the difficult decision to step down as your Director," Cheatle wrote. "I plan on spending time with my Fritos."That last part may have been fabricated. Obviously she put the "needs of this agency" last, and only resigned when Democrats demanded her resignation. Meanwhile, speaking of fabrication, the second-worst president of the modern age... is sadly still with us.
News that former President Jimmy Carter died on Tuesday does not appear to be true. X (formerly known as Twitter) is blowing up right now because of an "announcement" that appears to have been originally posted by far-right political activist and internet personality Laura Loomer. The post quickly began trending on social media, with many people retweeting it without taking a closer look. If they had, they would have noticed the multiple inaccurate statements specifically in paragraphs two through four. Loomer seemed to have realized fairly quickly that the announcement was fake, but her tweet had already been retweet many, many times.If Jimmy Carter can provide proof of life, why can't the Colander-in-Chief?
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:05 PM | Comments (492) | Trackbacks (Suck)

[Crossposted at CutJibNewsletter]
Posted by: CBD at 11:00 AM | Comments (515) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Francisco Goya
Posted by: CBD at 09:30 AM | Comments (537) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Good Morning Kids. Horrendous a human being as Joe Biden is (or was assuming he is still alive let alone compos mentis or compost) what the Democrat Left and the other powers that be did to him and to all of us, regardless of our politics, is every bit as disgusting as what has been done to Donald Trump vis a vis the shampeachments and kangaroo court show trials, let alone the assassination attempt. I get no schadenfreude from it, as it is yet another indication that whatever last vestiges of our nation as founded, and any shred of decency, morality and ethics have been completely eviscerated, or are on the verge of it.
Because those who installed Biden after sabotaging and then stealing the 2020 election somehow now feel as if their hold on power and their chance to seize and cement it once and for all sense that that ultimate goal might be slipping away, for a host of reasons, felt it necessary to get rid of him via what was and is in fact a textbook coup.The putschists who prevailed against President Biden therefore err badly in their assumptions, chief among them the belief that the office, not the man, is the singular thing conferring meaning and therefore power. This is an easily arrived-at error in the fantasyland of propositional civics, which replaces people with concepts, and in fact expects the people to conform to the concept: a coerced reversion to the pre-political state. But the truth is that a nation, contrary to propositionalism’s core thesis, is both man and law, both persons and forms. Moreover, the man and the person are the most important elements. In 1798 a predecessor in the presidency wrote to the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts, then preparing to go to war with the French Republic, reminding its officers that “[o]ur Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Solemn affirmations of basic rights are after all commonplaces in the constitutions and laws of nearly every autocratic society. . . . This, the ranks of dead collectivities, is where the United States finds itself under the present regime. The coup d’état of July 21st is merely a dramatic symptom. Note the artifice of it all, shot through with the cant and strictures of propositionalism. We could list the details at length, from the rapid coordination of the involved elites, each pursuing the fiction of reaction to affairs that they themselves authored, to the overthrow of the expressed will of tens of millions of primary voters. That process now lies exposed not as mass democracy, but as mass theater. One of the minor historical ironies here is that when Joe Biden first assumed elected office — a moment in time closer to the existence of a Habsburg Emperor than to now — the American presidential-selection system was undergoing a convulsive change, from party-elder diktat mostly via caucuses, to truly democratic primaries. What we just saw in the coup was supposed to have been rendered impossible back when our grandfathers were in middle age. Now we know better. We saw, and we know.Meanwhile Joe Biden who, despite being pulled out of the race by the powers that be is nowhere to be seen. He is after all still supposedly the alleged president. And as Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in the US neither Biden nor his presumptive replacement Kamala Harris were there to greet him. Despite the fact that this is their function, and that Israel is or at least was a staunch ally, their absence is telling. Even heads of state who visit that are not our allies, and some who are even considered rivals or enemies are traditionally met by the President. The fact that greeting Bibi could lose the Democrats Minnesota and Michigan and the support of those who harass or assault Jews on campuses and even in the streets in broad daylight I'm sure was part of the calculus, as well as not wanting to anger their friends in Tehran. So, Biden and Harris are absent, so who is running the show.
Meanwhile, this Kim Cheatle hack got roasted alive on Capitol Hill by the GOP and viciously and surprisingly by the Democrats. Many of whom have called for her resignation. I guess it's good theater. Have a good day.
- ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY
- A disturbing and haunting record.
Who is Kamala Harris?
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 06:28 AM | Comments (685) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Top Story
- The US is all-in on nuclear rockets. For realsies. (Ars Technica)
The article starts with a review of past US experiments with nuclear rockets:The first of those reactors was called Kiwi-A. The test done on July 1, 1959, proved that the concept worked, but there were devils in the details. Vibrations caused by the flow of hydrogen damaged the reactor after just five minutes of operation at a relatively meek 70 megawatts. The temperature reached 2,683 K, which caused hydrogen corrosion in the rods and expelled parts of the core through the nozzle, a problem known as "shedding."
Shedding, also known as "Fuck this I'm moving to Bouvet Island and you can contact me by albatross".
The primary impetus for this renewed interest despite some issues with past attempts is China's growing space industry. Nuclear rockets make far more efficient use of the reaction mass than chemical rockets, but are only practical for general use once you pass a certain size - about the size of SpaceX's starship - because you can't make small nuclear reactors.
Not unless you are willing to kill everyone who works on the project, anyway.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM | Comments (120) | Trackbacks (Suck)
July 22, 2024
Quote I “We have to maintain decorum in this committee, no matter how upset we get.” Rep. Kweisi Mfume (D-MD)
Quote II "Canberra is advanced in clean energy and renewable initiatives. The city has ambitious targets to achieve net zero emissions by 2045, and this is evident in the ongoing electrification and adoption of renewable energy sources throughout the area." Bryden Campbell, co-founders of Brand Rebellion
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at 10:01 PM | Comments (595) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 07:30 PM | Comments (522) | Trackbacks (Suck)
They're "surging the border" como El Presidente Josef Biden le dijé.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, a caravan of over 3,000 migrants is moving towards the U.S.-Mexico border, driven by fears of potential policy changes should Donald Trump return to the White House. The group, comprising individuals from several Central American nations, hopes to enter the United States before the possibility of stricter immigration regulations under a Trump administration. ... The Biden administration's current immigration policies have been criticized for being too lenient, leading to an increase in border crossings. In contrast, Trump's previous tenure was marked by efforts to tighten border security, including building a wall along the southern border and implementing the "Remain in Mexico" policy, which required asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while their claims were processed. The caravan's progress is being closely monitored, and its arrival at the U.S. border will likely intensify the debate over immigration policy in the final stretch of the presidential campaign. Trump has already signaled his intention to revive his hardline stance on immigration, making it a central issue of his campaign.A majority of Americans want immigration levels reduced.
A new Gallup poll reveals that for the first time since 2005, a majority of Americans want to see immigration levels reduced. Key Details: 55% of Americans support reducing immigration, up from 41% last year. 25% of respondents believe immigration levels should remain the same, while 16% think they should increase. The sentiment for reduced immigration spans across political affiliations, with significant increases among Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. Diving Deeper: A recent Gallup poll conducted from June 3 to 23 shows a significant shift in American public opinion on immigration. For the first time since 2005, a majority of Americans, 55%, believe that immigration levels should be decreased. This marks a notable increase from the previous year, where only 41% held this view. The poll indicates that the desire for reduced immigration spans across all political affiliations. Among Democrats, support for decreased immigration rose from 18% to 28%. Among Republicans, it increased from 73% to 88%, and among Independents, it went from 39% to 50%. This broad-based increase suggests growing concerns about immigration across the political spectrum. Additionally, the poll highlighted that while 25% of Americans think immigration levels should remain unchanged, only 16% believe they should increase. This is the lowest level of support for increased immigration since 2009.We have more Palace Intrigue, too: Someone is putting out the word that Biden had an "emergency medical" situation in his Las Vegas visit, where he tested positive for covid.
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11 Got a weird lead on a story that people should look into. I got a call from a source close to Las Vegas Metro. The official story was that Joe Biden's trip was cut short last week due to COVID. However, according to this source, US Secret Service informed LV Metro that there was an emergency situation involving Joe Biden and to close necessary streets so that POTUS could be transported immediately to University Medical, which they began to do in earnest. Then, mysteriously, there was a stand down order and the USSS informed local Vegas PD that they were going to "medivac" POTUS to Johns Hopkins, which they presumed meant fly him back east ASAP. Apparently the rumor mill in the police department was that Joe Biden was dying or possibly already dead. I didn't think too much about this lead, seemed too wild to be true, but given that Joe Biden has been out of public sight for days and dropped out of the race via an X post, and his brother James indicated health was a factor, I'm beginning to grow more curious if COVID or something else has been more serious than reported. If anyone with LV Metro has information, please email Freedom@CharlieKirk.com. I want to hear if there is more to the official story than what they're telling us.
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:30 PM | Comments (355) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Sounds like they threatened to push the 25th Amendment button, as I Baselessly Speculated Without Evidence earlier. (Remember, only leftists are permitted to speculate about the news. We conservatives have to limit ourselves to only parroting the official (Democrat) story, or else we're Russian Agent Conspiracy Theorists.)
Jake Tapper is allowed to guess at secret motives and unadmitted possibilities -- you're not.Top Dems threatened to forcibly remove Biden from office unless he resigned, set him up to fail at Trump debate: Sources By Social Links for Isabel Vincent Operatives at the very highest levels of the Democratic Party threatened Joe Biden with forcibly removing him from office unless he stepped down, sources told The Post. The well-orchestrated "palace coup" to stop the faltering president seeking re-election has been in place for weeks, but stubborn Biden fought against it every step of the way, a source close to the Biden family told The Post Monday.How dare Biden resist the coupists! Who does he think he is, Trump?!?!
The insider also made clear the anger, paranoia and frustration Biden displayed as the party elite circled around him and piled on the pressure. Part of the "elaborate" strategy to remove Biden from the race -- as he announced in a shock letter posted on X Sunday -- was allowing him to debate Republican candidate Donald Trump last month on live TV in Atlanta. ... "That debate was a set-up to convince Democrats that he couldn't run for president," the family source said Monday. As calls for him to bow out mounted, Biden insisted he would continue, but party bigwigs threatened to invoke the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution. The amendment allows for the vice president and members of the cabinet to declare he is unfit to serve and force him to step down, the source added. The White House and representatives from the Democratic National Committee did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.Hunter says it was all a set-up. I guess he'll be filing frivolous lawsuits now.
John Ekdahl sent this to me before the Coup Plotters won -- turns out, the famous "intelligence community" conspirators were intimately involved in this coup, too.
"Hunter felt he [Joe Biden] was being set up and he was very concerned about his father," the source said. "These people, these officials were not on Joe's side." ...
Democratic Party insiders have also known for at least two years how Biden was in decline, said the source. "When I saw him a couple of years ago, it was frightening," said the source. "He was just repeating slogans and had no idea who I was."

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 05:24 PM | Comments (535) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Democrat Ro Khanna Tells Her She Should Resign
Girlbosses don't take responsibility, ever. Girlbosses crave power -- but not responsibility. When they fail, they look for a nearby White Man they can claim Failed to Position Them for Success.
From Not the Bee. Here, she stonewalls Rep. Comer and claims she can't answer the most basic questions because... I don't know. She claims there's an investigation going on and she can't answer anything until the investigation is over. What? She continued stonewalling Jordan, telling him that she will not answer questions about discussions she had with her employees. He points out that she got a 9% raise while "cutting corners" in the agency.Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 04:20 PM | Comments (422) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Just eight months into his first term.
Obviously the cover up began before then -- with the entire scripted "Basement Biden" strategy. I know you're a slack-jawed. Not because you're surprised, just because you're all yokels and walk around gawping at everything, motor cars and aer-o-planes and fine Parisian digital watches. From Ed Morrissey, quothing the WSJ.The Wall Street Journal today reports on the start date of the cover-up -- October 2021. The setting: Biden's infrastructure bill. The stakes: His main legislative agenda. Biden's focus ... almost entirely absent:Emphasis mine. And there's a good reason Pelosi didn't invite Biden to come back, too.
President Biden had just finished trying to persuade a group of congressional Democrats to pass a $1 trillion infrastructure bill when Nancy Pelosi, then the House speaker, took the microphone. In 30 minutes of remarks on Capitol Hill, Biden had spoken disjointedly and failed to make a concrete ask of lawmakers, according to Democrats in the room. After he left, a visibly frustrated Pelosi told the group she would articulate what Biden had been trying to say, one lawmaker said. "It was the first time I remember people pretty jarred by what they had seen," recalled Rep. Dean Phillips (D., Minn.), who would go on to mount an unsuccessful primary challenge against the president. That was October 2021. That month was the last time Biden met with the House Democratic caucus on the Hill regarding legislation.
Gee, I wonder if the usual Fake News Liars will once again denounce a WSJ story about Biden's dementia as "thinly-sourced partisan lies"? Little flashback from July 8: Biden's WH physician, who of course repeatedly lied about Biden being "fit for duty" and who studiously avoided administering a cognitive function test -- or administered one, then lied about having done so -- was a partner in the Biden Crime Family, benefiting from Middle Class Joe's ability to shape policy for personal enrichment.
President Joe Biden is leaning on the credibility of White House physician Kevin O'Connor's optimistic assessment of his health, but that physician is a family intimate and one-time business associate of the president's brother. When Biden's brother Jim was exploring a business venture aimed at securing Veterans Affairs contracts in 2017, O'Connor introduced him to a military-focused medical team and accompanied him to a meeting with a hospital president. "You and your team clearly share our vision," O'Connor wrote to the hospital president following the business meeting. The family ties transcend business. In a 2018 deposition, the president's sister-in-law, Sara Biden, described O'Connor as a "friend" who frequently doled out medical advice to her family. When Joe Biden had left the vice presidency the previous year, O'Connor -- his government-assigned military doctor -- emailed more than a dozen members of the Biden clan, saying, "You've all been a really important part of my life." On Monday, The New York Times reported that O'Connor had met with a specialist in Parkinson's Disease who visited the White House eight times in eight months, fanning a new round of speculation about Biden's wellbeing. In response to a question about the visits, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates cited a White House statement that "A wide variety of specialists from the Walter Reed system visit the White House complex to treat thousands of military personnel who work on the grounds." Bates also cited a February memo from O'Connor to White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre that said a neurologic exam revealed no findings consistent with Parkinson's or a host of other neurological disorders. But experts in presidential health, and its long history of medical cover ups, said the close personal bonds between the Bidens and O'Connor intensify the inherent conflicts in relying on the White House physician to accurately convey the state of his employer's health to the public. "That compounds the problem," said Matthew Algeo, historian and author of "The President is a Sick Man" about Grover Cleveland's coverup of an 1893 cancer procedure. "You're working for the guy you're examining, and he's your buddy. It's just a lose-lose situation."Or win-win. Obviously Congress will have to conduct hearings and determine who knew what and who covered up what. I imagine everyone will perjure themselves or stonewall Congress, and then Biden will pardon them all for their massive perjuries in the transition period between the term Trump actually won and the term Trump gets to actually serve. Below: Wow. Biden's brother is celebrating having Biden back, "to enjoy whatever time we have left." He admits that Biden's health was a "major factor" in the decision. Biden's White House of remorseless liars has repeatedly denied this.
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 03:20 PM | Comments (501) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Still no word from the man who supposedly "withdrew" from the race.
But Kamala's making herself at home in the White House. Enjoy it while you can!Vice President Kamala Harris on Monday applauded President Joe Biden and his accomplishments in the White House in her first public remarks since he endorsed her for president. Harris said Biden's "legacy of accomplishment over the past three years is unmatched in modern history." "In one term, he has already surpassed the legacy of most presidents who have served two terms in office," Harris said on the South Lawn of the White House at an event celebrating NCAA athletes who won championships in the 2023-24 season. The vice president said that she has witnessed the president's "honesty" and "integrity" and "commitment to faith and his family" as well as "his big heart and his deep love of our country." "I am a firsthand witness that every day our President Joe Biden fights for the American people and we are deeply, deeply grateful for his service to our nation," she said. Harris said that Biden wanted to attend the event, which he has hosted in past years, and is "feeling much better" and "recovering fast" from his Covid diagnosis last week. "He looks forward to getting back on the road," she said about Biden, who has been isolating at his home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.Sure.
... Harris said in a statement Sunday that she's honored to have earned Biden's endorsement and said her "intention is to earn and win this nomination." Scores of Democrats, including some high-profile governors and lawmakers, have since endorsed Harris for the presidential nomination. But other congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, have not yet explicitly expressed support for her.Pelosi is doing what Hot Air calls a "two-step" to avoid endorsing Kamala Harris while pretending to be supportive. And she's one of the people pushing this obvious con on Kamala Harris that it would benefit her to have an open convention, with delegates free to vote for people other than Kamala Harris. Pelosi is trying to get Kamala Harris to agree to an open convention which would have the purpose and result of nominating anyone other than Kamala Harris.
That's the headline Hot Air give it. Here's Politico:
Pelosi Doing the 'Avoid Harris at All Costs' Two-Step
Sure, Jan. That's your reason. Not to nominate someone else -- no, just to avoid the appearance of a coronation. Another Democrat was trying to sell Kamala Harris on the idea that an open convention would bring excitement and drama to the convention, which would make Harris an even stronger candidate when nominated. Left unsaid, obviously: But we intend to nominate someone else so that that person can benefit from this excitement and drama, and have one easy win under his belt before November -- "I beat Kamala Harris -- the Final Boss of Political Power-Players!"
In a meeting with fellow California Democrats last week, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi stressed the need for an open process to choose the party's next nominee if President Joe Biden steps aside, in an effort to avoid the appearance of a Kamala Harris coronation.
Politico is such a piece-of-sh!t propaganda operation. No skepticism at all -- just repeating the talking points Pelosi tells them to propagate. Update: Pelosi has now "endorsed" Kamala.
The discussion in that meeting of the California delegation, which includes 40 members, took place in the Capitol on July 10, at least partly focused on the complicated next steps for the Democratic Party if Biden left the ticket. And they specifically talked about the potential political downsides of party elites quickly crowning the vice president as the next nominee, according to four people familiar with the discussion, granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. Pelosi was one of several California Democrats who stressed that an uncompetitive process would turn off voters, according to those four people. The concern wasn't about Harris' strengths as a candidate -- and in fact, several people made clear Harris needed to be the party's next pick -- but instead centered on worries that party bosses were choosing the president, rather than the party's base.
Muhammad TayyubThis is congruent with my belief that Nancy Pelosi will continue "supporting" Kamala while also supporting an open convention -- in order to con Kamala Harris out of the nomination. Stay Strong, Kamala. I'm sure there were times when you were working on Willie Brown's flabby penis when you thought about giving up. But you persevered, you kept sucking, and you got those promotions.
@Eng_Tayyub BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Vice Pres. Harris for president. In a statement, Pelosi wrote, "Make no mistake: Kamala Harris as a woman in politics is brilliantly astute -- and I have full confidence that she will lead us to victory in November."
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 02:20 PM | Comments (498) | Trackbacks (Suck)
The twitter post about it means nothing, because we've known forever that Biden has nothing to do with that account.
Where's Joe? Some are Asking Questions.I can't buy into this theory, but this is a major, major decision affecting the country. Until Biden signs on the line that he's withdrawing, we should not permit him to withdraw (or to be withdrawn by others). We require a signature and a witness for most legal matters. But in this case, we're taking the word of a twitter account run by anonymous propagandists? No. Supposedly Biden's White House staffers only learned that Biden was "dropping out" from the tweet that was written and posted by someone other than Joe Biden.
"He announced it via Twitter... I thought that if Joe Biden was going to do this, he would've announced that he had a presser or... some sort of big statement that he was going to give from the Oval Office or from the White House somewhere, and that he was going to do that at a preset time later in the evening.... The rest of the world knows that Joe Biden is... totally senile and not in control of his faculties at this point. I mean, when Joe Biden wakes up and someone tells him he's no longer running for president, he's gonna be quite shocked about that. I would assume. I mean, by the way, he could wake up tomorrow and undo this...." Said Ben Shapiro, in the new episode of his podcast. So, yeah, what evidence do we have that Joe Biden knows he has given up his candidacy and released the delegates pledged to him? We haven't seen him. He's been sick with Covid. When last we heard from him in person he was defiantly clinging to the candidacy, apparently still believing that he is the one person who can save the world from Donald Trump. We were simply handed written statements. Shapiro imagines Joe Biden shocked to hear that he's dropped out. He could be shocked because he didn't actually agree to drop out, but he could be shocked because he actually is something like what Ben Shapiro calls "totally senile" and he doesn't remember or understand what he did or supposedly did yesterday. Is his written statement binding?
POLITICOI started to feel that Biden would not drop out after all of those statements that he was in it to win it on Friday. I kept saying, "All he has to do to resist this pressure is just keep saying, 'no.' And that's all he has to do, say 'no.'" But then on Saturday, I realized that wasn't true: They could force Biden out: By the 25th Amendment process. The scenario I considered is that every Cabinet secretary (they vote in the 25th Amendment process) could come forward to Biden and tell him, "If you force us to invoke the 25th Amendment, we will all vote that you are 'incapacitated,' and you'll lose this presidency as well as the next one. And you'll go down in history as the first officially-senile president." So here's my own conspiracy theory about why Joe isn't talking: Joe called their bluff and said "then have your vote." They voted, and declared him incapacitated -- secretly. Then, instead of making this public, they took the vote to Biden, and said, "We are about to announce this. But you can negotiate a way out. Just withdraw from the race, and we'll bury this vote and never speak of it again." That could explain this very strange situation. Obviously, this would mean that Biden is currently not the president, as upon the taking of this (hypothetical) vote he ceased to be president and Kamala Harris became president, and that means that the nation is currently being run by an illegal junta. In other words-- par for the course. Per Wikipedia: they could even declare him temporarily incapacitated, and then restore him to office when they decide the "incapacitation" ends. In other words, when Biden says "Okay, I withdraw."
@politico Biden's announcement stunned White House and campaign aides, who up until this afternoon were insisting he'd stay in the race. "We're all finding out by tweet," said one Dem. "None of us understand what's happening."
The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution deals with presidential succession and disability. It clarifies that the vice president becomes president if the president dies, resigns, or is removed from office through impeachment, and establishes how a vacancy in the office of the vice president can be filled. It also provides for the temporary transfer of the president's powers and duties to the vice president, either on the initiative of the president alone or on the initiative of the vice president together with a majority of the president's cabinet. In either case, the vice president becomes acting president until the presidential powers and duties are returned to the president.I don't believe my own conspiracy theory, but I also don't disbelieve it. This crew has shown themselves to be sneaky, mendacious, and infinitely corrupt and lawless. If there are gaps in any of their official stories, it is prudent to fill those gaps with assumptions of crimes and corruptions.
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:20 PM | Comments (616) | Trackbacks (Suck)
CHEATLE ADMITS SHE ASSIGNED FOUR TIMES AS MANY AGENTS TO PROTECT JILL BIDEN THAN TO PROTECT TRUMP
Happy Monday! This is the time on Sprockets when we dance. My eyes are mostly better. I didn't go on the computer all weekend, except briefly after Biden "dropped out," as they're claiming.
Update: Cheatle admits that Doctor President Jill Biden had four times the manpower devoted to protecting her worthless status-tripping ass than to the most threatened man on earth, and the most likely next President of the United States.Sen. Chuck Grassley has demanded answers from the Secret Service after discovering that First Lady Jill Biden received significantly more security than former President Donald Trump at their respective Pennsylvania events on July 13, 2024. Key Details: First Lady Jill Biden had 12 Secret Service personnel for "post standing" at her Pittsburgh event.
Former President Donald Trump had only 3 Secret Service personnel for "post standing" at his rally in Butler.
Sen. Chuck Grassley is investigating the disparity and potential security lapses that led to a shooting at Trump's rally. Diving Deeper: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has raised serious concerns about the Secret Service's allocation of security resources following a revelation that First Lady Jill Biden received four times the number of Secret Service personnel than former President Donald Trump for events in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Grassley's inquiry stems from whitleblowers, showing that Jill Biden had 12 agents for "post standing" at her Pittsburgh event, while Trump had only 3 for his rally in Butler. This discrepancy is particularly striking given the increased security threats against Trump. The Secret Service had previously claimed to ramp up security for Trump due to an alleged Iranian plot to assassinate him. Despite this, the agency assigned significantly fewer agents for "post standing" at his rally compared to those assigned to Jill Biden. Emails with the subject lines "203.080 First Lady Dr. Jill Bident to Pittsburgh, PA" and "203.080 Candidate Donald Trump to Pittsburgh, PA" detail the specific personnel assignments. The email for Jill Biden lists 12 post-standers, whereas Trump's email lists only 3.
First of all: Even though the Secret Service had been alerted to a suspicious person, with a rifle, on the roof of a custom-built sniper's platform, they never bothered telling Trump about it.
Donald Trump revealed Saturday that he was not warned by the Secret Service about the gunman who shot him at a Pennsylvania rally last weekend -- despite agents eyeing the suspect for hours before the attack. "Nobody mentioned it," Trump, 78, told Jesse Watters in an upcoming episode of the Fox News anchor's primetime show. "Nobody said it was a problem," the Republican presidential nominee said. "[They] could've said, 'Let's wait for 15, 20 minutes, 5 minutes.' Nobody said...I think that was a mistake," he added. Trump questioned how gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to climb onto a roof with a rifle in hand just 130 yards away from the politician without the Secret Service taking action.
Police even saw Crooks on the building 26 minutes before he opened fire -- and were alerted by frantically screaming witnesses -- but didn't take action. The Secret Service didn't make any moves until after Crooks squeezed off up to seven shots at Trump, grazing the candidate in the ear and killing one audience member.
I don't believe the theory that they planned it all, but it's a fair question to ask: If they were to indeed plan out an assassination, what, exactly, would they do differently than they actually did?
Secret Service officials repeatedly rejected Donald Trump's request for additional security in the two years before last weekend's assassination attempt, The Post has learned. The ex-president, 78, asked for more agents and magnetometers at large public events he attended, as well as extra snipers for outdoor venues, four insiders told The Washington Post, which first reported the damning revelation. Each request was shot down by senior officials who claimed the agency lacked the resources Trump was asking for, the outlet reported. ... Outrage at the security lapse led the federal security agency to up Trump's detail to the same level as President Biden, The Post exclusively reported earlier this week. The Secret Service initially denied claims that someone from Trump's camp asked for more help ahead of the deadly shooting as "absolutely false."The left's fixation on deplatforming was behind this -- Trump doesn't deserve to speak so why should we "platform" him by giving him enough Secret Service protection to allow him to speak safely? Obviously, there needs to be a purge. I'm a broken record on that.
Anthony Guglielmi, a spokesman for the Secret Service, admitted to The Washington Post that the agency had denied Trump's request for additional security, but claimed it had only learned about the new information in the wake of the tragedy. Guglielmi told The Post that there were "some instances where specific Secret Service specialized units or resources were not provided," but that the agency instead utilized state or local partners to add protections.And they went down to the local SoulCycle to recruit additional "resources." Kim Cheatle is currently testilying before Congress. She's denying she endorsed the "30 by 30" DEI plan, the insane scheme to fill the agents' ranks with 30% women by 2030.
Susan CrabtreeShe refuses to say how many spent shell casings were found on the roof of the assassin's perch -- because that would reveal how many bullets the Secret Service allowed this killer to fire before bothering to fire back.
@susancrabtree A GOP member asks Cheatle about her well-reported DEI hiring policies -- that she has signed onto a "30x30" pledge to make the agency 30 percent by 2030. Cheatle is flat-out LYING about her DEI hiring policies. Unbelievable -- she is not acknowledging that she signed onto it. FACT: Months ago, her own spokesman Guglielmi confirmed to me that she signed onto the 30x30 pledge, and she has stated that diversifying the Secret Service is one of her top priorities. GOP member: "You spent some time trying to change the makeup of the Secret Service -- does this affect at overall [quality] of who you were hiring at the USSS Cheatle completely dodges. "I spent my time as director tyring to increase the number of people we hire on the Secret Service so that we have the best and brightest...and that's my job as director of the USSS." "I'm hiring the best-qualified candidates that put in an application that want to work for our great organization." ... I'll link my RealClearPolitics story quoting Guglielmi on this as soon as I can.
Benjamin Weingarten
@bhweingarten
Director Cheatle won't say how many spent shell casings were on AGR roof
Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:12 PM | Comments (656) | Trackbacks (Suck)
The big news over the past several weeks – outside of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and related security omissions – has been the ongoing palace coup against Joe Biden.
The news media and pundits became domestic Kremlinologists as they tried to work their sources for leaks about what was going on behind closed doors among high-ranking Democrats who sought to remove the sitting President from the ballot, even though President Biden had won the nomination at the ballot box during the primaries. We should not be having palace coups in this country. We ought not need Kremlinologists to determine if “the party” is planning a coup. And we cannot tolerate ballot-substitutions for general elections after voters have already democratically* chosen their party’s candidate via primary elections. [*I am using the generally accepted definition of “democracy” as being representative government as elected by voters. The fact that we are largely governed by bureaucrats and judges but not by elected representatives is a discussion for another day.] National Democrats and their media mouthpieces have made “saving democracy” the foundation of their sales pitch in the Trump era. But now we are finding out that Democrats will gladly sabotage democracy to avoid losing power. Apparently you must undermine democracy to save democracy. It’s not just national Democrats launching an assault on the ballot box however, it’s happening at the state level too. In Georgia, state Democrats are furiously trying to keep a collection of leftist presidential candidates off the ballot, lest they draw votes from whomever the Democrats finally install as their un-democratically chosen presidential candidate. “Georgia Democrats file challenges to keep Kennedy and others off presidential ballot” [AP – 7/15/2024]Georgia Democrats are challenging efforts to place Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and three other candidates on the state’s presidential ballots, part of a nationwide effort to block candidates who could siphon votes from incumbent President Joe Biden.The Democrats’ efforts to keep other left-wing presidential candidates off the November ballot isn’t just restricted to the state of Georgia.
Spokespersons for alternative candidates say they’re also seeing challenges in Delaware, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and the District of Columbia. “We expect to be challenged in every state that we file in this year,” said Rick Lass, ballot access director for the Green Party’s Stein.Oh right, the Green Party. I vividly recall the 2000 election when Democrats proudly embraced “election denialism” and accused George W. Bush and the Supreme Court of stealing the election. Democrats were also furious at Ralph Nader and the Green Party for capturing the votes of eco-minded individuals who otherwise would have cast their presidential ballots for climate prophet Al Gore.
Kennedy and Cornel West, seeking access as independents in Georgia, can only make the ballot through the petition process. Claudia De la Cruz, the nominee of the Party for Socialism and Liberation, also submitted petitions. All three say they submitted enough signatures before a July 9 deadline. Currently, voter registrations and signatures are being verified by county election offices…Activists are obtaining thousands of signatures via petitions to get their candidate on the ballot. Who could oppose that level of grass roots democracy? The answer is, “Democrats.”
Democrats also argue that at least some of the signatures on the petitions filed for Kennedy, West and De la Cruz are invalid because the petitions are wrongly or incompletely filled out. Democrats also argue that Kennedy and West, as independents, must submit separate petitions for all 16 electors. The challengers say West’s electors didn’t qualify before an earlier June 21 deadline, and that electors for Kennedy, West and De la Cruz all failed to pay required $1.50 filing fees.”…at least some of the signatures on the petitions filed for Kennedy, West and De la Cruz are invalid because the petitions are wrongly or incompletely filled out.” Yet these same establishment Democrats objecting to imperfect petition signatures that might benefit the Green Party candidate are opposed to ballot integrity or performing signature verification on absentee ballots that benefit Democrat candidates in the general election. Go figure. It’s almost like there is not any great principle regarding “our precious democracy” going on after all. Who knew?
“We reject the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party in claiming to be the protectors of democracy from Trump as they infringe on the rights of tens of thousands of voters who want more options on the Georgia ballot,” Smolarek said in a statement.“Saving our democracy” turns out to be just an Orwellian euphemism for snuffing out democracy whenever and wherever needed to keep the Democrats in power. [buck.throckmorton at protonmail dot com]
Posted by: Buck Throckmorton at 11:00 AM | Comments (489) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Mast House and Brunswick Dock at Blackwall
William Daniell Those are east Indiamen...all committed to trade with the world for the East India Company.
That's a lot of ships!
Posted by: CBD at 09:31 AM | Comments (450) | Trackbacks (Suck)

- ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY
- Victor Davis Hanson: Can we cease the charge of Trump the fascist since it has not only been proven false but has revealed far more about the authoritarian and conspiratorial nature of the accusers than their target?
A Decade of Conspiracists?
- You don’t hate woke school administrators enough.
CA 7-Yr-Old Punished as Racist for ‘Any Life Matters’ Drawing
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 06:38 AM | Comments (622) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Top Story
- Southwest Airlines escaped the CrowdStrike debacle because they are still running Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. (Tom's Hardware)
One small problem with this story: It's complete bullshit. (Twitter)
It's an internet meme. But even the guy who created the meme got confused and thought it was real.
Seriously, nobody runs their business on Windows 3.1. It doesn't even work properly on a computer with more than 512MB of RAM. Neither does Windows 95.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:12 AM | Comments (176) | Trackbacks (Suck)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.172 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.1672 seconds, 25 records returned.
Page size 75 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.
