Ace of Spades HQ

February 06, 2024

CNN's Rating Are Getting Hammered Harder Than Fani Willis in a Hotel 9

"That's right -- a Hotel 9. I said what I said."

-- Darrius "Sweetdick" Honeycum, Esquire

CNN's ratings for January are weaker than Brian Stelter's portion control.


You may have heard Tuesday the History Channel and something called INSP, a cable network that mostly shows old western movies, beat CNN in its mid-January ratings. This is not the first time CNN plunged behind the History Channel, a network best known for John Wayne movies and "Ancient Aliens." CNN fell behind History Channel in 2018, right in the thick of former President Trump's midterms.

According to the numbers analyzed Monday by the New York Post, CNN's "Laura Coats Show" interview with Vice President Kamala Harris garnered just 72,000 viewers in the key 25-54 demographic. And personally, knowing a little bit about how this data is measured, I bet these 72,000 views just came from the TV screens anchored to the walls of every Planet Fitness and airport terminal.

...

It wouldn't surprise me if CNN disappears altogether in the coming year or so, depending on how this election year plays out. Without a total rebrand, no one in their right mind is going to trust anyone at CNN ever again.

Yeah I don't buy that last speculation at all -- the rule of the leftwing media is that everyone and everything fails up -- but it pleases me to read it.

CNN is reorganizing its morning lineup to try to increase ratings.

Which means they're shifting various losers around in the schedule, apparently hoping that Jim Acosta will gain the gravitas and authority at 10 am which somehow eludes him at 9pm on Saturdays.


CNN is reportedly making drastic changes as a ratings slump continues to take its toll on the network, and one morning show left over from the Chris Licht era is getting the ax.

"CNN This Morning" hosts Poppy Harlow and Phil Mattingly will reportedly take on a new role at the network, though it's unclear what that role would be. Kasie Hunt, who currently hosts the morning show beginning at 5:00 a.m., will move into hosting a shorter version of "CNN This Morning" that will run from 5:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., according to Mediaite. Page Six is also reporting that the morning show will be sent to the chopping block.

...

Jim Acosta will be hosting "CNN Newsroom" that starts at 10:00 a.m., according to the report.

Wolf Blitzer will temporarily host the 11:00 a.m., show "The Bulletin with Pamela Brown" until Brown returns from maternity leave, Mediaite reported.

Wow. That is a powerblock of TV right there.

...

The changes, which are expected to be announced in an internal memo Monday, also mean the team that currently produces "CNN This Morning" in New York will be disbanded, Mediaite reported....

It is unclear what roles Harlow and Mattingly will play.

Via Ed Driscoll, who reminds us of CNN's claims about miners becoming coders.

Code we must, "journalists."

Code we must.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 03:20 PM | Comments (403) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Biden Pressured Amazon to Censor Any Books Departing From the Government's Lying Covid Narratives

Oh no some public schools won't be stocking boy-on-boy blowjob comic books for kids...!

But let's ignore the Biden Administration leaning on the world's biggest bookseller to keep all adults from buying books whose messages Biden's Stasi find inconvenient and Unapproved.

The Biden administration pressured Amazon to censor books related to COVID-19 vaccines in early 2021 citing concerns that the material contained "propaganda" and "misinformation," internal company emails released by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) appear to show.

The documents were obtained by the House Judiciary Committee and the Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government via subpoena, Jordan said in a X thread Monday, which he dubbed, "THE AMAZON FILES."

"Who can we talk to about the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?" Andrew Slavitt, a former White House senior advisor for COVID-19 response, wrote to the online retailer in a March 2, 2021, email, released by Jordan.

"If you search for 'vaccines' under books, I see what comes up," Slavitt wrote in a follow up message that same day. "I haven't looked beyond that but if that's what's on the surface, it's concerning."

Amazon officials initially balked at performing "a manual intervention" to remove certain book titles from appearing, arguing that it would be "too visible" and lead to further scrutiny.

"We will not be doing a manual intervention today," an email between Amazon executives reads. "The team/PR feels very strongly that it is too visible, and will further compound the Harry/Sally narrative (which is getting the Fox News treatment today apparently), and won't fix the problem long-term ... because of customer behavior associates."

The Amazon officials, whose name is redacted from the email, then notes that another individual at the company, whose name is also redacted, "gave very direct guidance to the teams to be boring and not do anything that is visible and will draw more attention."

The email states that a tweak to the bookseller's website that would redirect more customers searching certain keywords to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website was in the works and that a screenshot of that change should be sent to the White House, but it warned employees to play coy with the Biden administration about potential further actions.

More at the link.

Related: A member of Meta's (FaceBook's) "Oversight Board" says that they need more power to censor if they want to really rig the 2024 election like they did in 2020.

A Meta Oversight Board member whined that the platform's election-interfering 2020 censorship was "not enough."

Despite a widely cited Media Research Center poll showing that Big Tech censorship altered 2020 presidential election results, Meta Oversight Board member Pamela San Martín claimed Facebook's censorship was not sufficient. San Martín called for more censorship in a January interview with WIRED. She not only demanded increased censorship but announced that the Board has made a "lot of the decisions and the case selection" with the 2024 election in mind. She also urged Meta to strike "preemptively" for its election censorship.

San Martín's suggestions for Meta include "adding labels to posts that are related to elections, directing people to reliable information, prohibiting paid advertisement when it calls into question the legitimacy of elections, and implementing WhatsApp forward limits." Her advice to coordinate with election officials seems to be a direct encouragement toward tech-government censorship collusion.

"No election is exactly the same as the previous one," San Martín confessed. "So even though we're addressing the problems that arose in prior elections as a starting point, it is not enough."

More at the link.

By the way, Andrew Slavitt is ignoring subpoenas demanding he testify about his direct involvement in all phases of covid censorship.

The White House just prosecuted Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro for refusing to comply with a subpoena -- and got him sentenced to four months imprisonment -- but is actively scheming with Andy Slavitt on how to dodge his own subpoenas.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 02:17 PM | Comments (374) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Liberal DC Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Trump's Claims of Presidential Immunity

Not great for Trump.

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump cannot shake off his charges for an alleged effort to subvert the 2020 election by claiming presidential immunity.

Trump, who is facing four criminal indictments, has argued that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for actions taken in office unless they are first impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate. The three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found unanimously that Trump cannot invoke presidential immunity against the four-count indictment alleging he conspired to overturn the 2020 election.

"We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a President has unbounded authority to commit crimes. ... Nor can we sanction his apparent contention that the Executive has carte blanche to violate the rights of individual citizens to vote and to have their votes count," the appeals court panel said in the 57-page ruling Tuesday.

The decision is a notable blow against Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2024 election, who is accused on four criminal counts of attempting to subvert the 2020 election. While the judges were not asked to find Trump liable for the alleged crimes, they made clear the seriousness of his charges if he were convicted.

"Former President Trump's alleged efforts to remain in power despite losing the 2020 election were, if proven, an unprecedented assault on the structure of our government," the court said, adding Trump's stances "would collapse our system of separated powers" by placing him outside the scope of the three branches of government.

"We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," the court said.

The District of Columbia Circuit told Trump he has until Monday to appeal the decision, including with a request to pause his trial proceedings. If he does, the criminal trial that is before U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the first to rule against his immunity claims, will not resume until after his appeal reaches a final resolution.

What Trump would like is for the Supreme Court to take this appeal. If they agree to hear the issue, that would almost certainly push the trial off well past the election.

But they do have to agree to hear it for that to happen. For a case to be entertained by the Supreme Court, four justices have to agree to grant certiorari. I don't really know what that means but my head cannon is "certified that a Constitutional issue is at play which the Supreme Court must resolve."

If four justices do not agree to hear the case -- if the Court "denies cert" -- then the DC Circuit Court of Appeals' word is the operative ruling, and the trial can be scheduled before the election.

I would not count on the Supreme Court granting cert. They may, but they may not. Amy Coney Barrett is basically a Roberts liberal, and Kavanaugh is also weak.


I would hope that the Supreme Court considers this case important enough to hear, even if only to put a check on the Deep State's obvious headlong rush to interfere in the 2024 election.

But Roberts will always vote to uphold Regime authority, Barrett seems to be his puppet, and Kavanaugh also seems to really want to be liked by the liberal Permanent Government of DC.

Update: TheJamesMadison says I'm all wet about Kavanaugh:


I'm getting the sense that Kavanaugh is much more...antagonistic to the administrative state than we were led to believe.

In the Raimondo oral arguments, he was apparently the primary antagonistic voice, even moreso than Gorsuch who's been trying to create an anti-Chevron coalition since he showed up on the SCOTUS bench.

He could be right.

Shipwreckedcrew
@shipwreckedcrew

Reading the DC Appeals Court decision. Lots of comments later but right now I'm headed for a cross-country flight so time is limited.

Initial impression:

"We beg you, Justices of the Supreme Court, please take this nightmare off our hands."

This thing is written in a way that begs for SCOTUS review.
10:44 AM * Feb 6, 2024

I don't know how an appeals court writes an opinion that "begs" the Supreme Court to review them, but, there's his opinion.

Thanks to Martini Farmer.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:14 PM | Comments (384) | Trackbacks (Suck)

McConnell Advises Republican Senators to Vote "No" on Amnesty Bill He Personally Negotiated

This party must be abandoned. We cannot continue like this, where we never even get to fight the Democrats -- we're constantly having to fight our own "leaders" to please, please, for once, take our side in a debate.

But they won't: The GOP Establishment loathes, detests, hates, despises its own voters. We are, in fact, Deplorables in their eyes.


Facing a torrent of criticism from conservatives, Senate Republicans on Monday resisted advancing on a bipartisan proposal intended to clamp down on illegal border crossings, signaling a likely defeat in Congress that would leave leaders with no clear path to approve wartime aid for Ukraine.

In a dramatic turnaround, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell recommended to GOP senators in a closed-door meeting that they vote against the first procedural vote Wednesday, according to two people familiar with the meeting who were not authorized to talk publicly about it and spoke anonymously.

It came just hours after the Kentucky Republican had urged colleagues on the Senate floor that "it's now time for Congress to take action." But McConnell has struggled to marshal his conference to support the package of $118 billion package of border enforcement policy and funding for Ukraine, Israel and other U.S. allies.

Senate negotiators on Sunday night released the text of the bill, hoping that the details would win over skeptics. The carefully negotiated deal represented a rightward shift in Senate negotiations over border measures, yet the backlash was still intense from conservatives. They savaged the border policy proposal as insufficient, with former President Donald Trump leading the charge.

"This is a gift to the Democrats. And this sort of is a shifting of the worst border in history onto the shoulders of Republicans," Trump, the likely Republican presidential nominee, said Monday on "The Dan Bongino Show." "They want this for the presidential election so they can now blame the Republicans for the worst border in history."

Via Jazz Shaw at Hot Air, who adds:

Lankford is the missing piece of the puzzle here. As recently as yesterday, he went on Fox and Friends and continued to defend the bill, criticizing Republicans who were opposing it. He was generous enough to say that if conservatives were fighting against the idea of allowing 5,000 illegal aliens to be released into the country each day, "We can do 3,000." The backlash against his plan back in his home state led some members of the Oklahoma Republican Party to hold a meeting to discuss censuring him, though the measure was not officially passed. Others took to social media calling on Lankford to resign.

McConnell's determination to ram through yet another Comprehensive Amnesty will have several terrible aftereffects.

On the strictly political side, it gives Biden and Schumer what they actually wanted all along: A way to blame Republicans for the Democrats' border catastrophe. Democrats will claim the solution to the open border crisis was at hand, but Republicans rejected it for political reasons.

Indeed, turncoat "Republican" liberal James Lankford is going out on all the political talk shows making exactly that case.

On the policy side, Democrats will now insist that this weak "deal" establish the contours of any future "deal." In other words: The Republicans have announced that they seek only the tiniest breadcrumbs in exchange for mass amnesty; why would Democrats ever agree to offer more than breadcrumbs in any "deal"? McConnell has committed us, out to the medium future, to sharing the Democrats' Amnesty First, Security Last (or Never) agenda.

The "deal," by the way, contained a Very Special Betrayal for conservatives: The bill would make the ultra-liberal DC Circuit Court the only court empowered to decide questions about immigration and border enforcement. We've seen some good rulings coming out of the Fifth Circuit on the border; this "deal" would take all cases away from any conservative-tilted court and give them all to the leftwing DC circuit.

This is a "deal." You guys are excited by this "deal," right?

Sean Davis on McConnell's walkback:

Sean Davis
@seanmdav

Let this be a lesson to any Republican stupid enough to go out on a limb to do McConnnell's dirty work: he will leave you out to dry, then cut off the limb you're standing on to save his own behind.

Make no mistake: McConnell picked Lankford for this kamikaze mission because 1) Lankford isn't up for re-election until 2028, and 2) Lankford didn't have the experience or wits to accomplish anything substantive against Schumer and Biden, whose goals on immigration and Ukraine perfectly align with McConnell's.

It was vintage Mitch McConnell: work feverishly behind the scenes on behalf of his donors and the Uniparty to fleece taxpayers, pick an unsuspecting dupe to bear the public burden of carrying McConnell's slop bucket, then throw the poor dupe right under the bus when everything goes sideways.

Dinesh D'Souza
@DineshDSouza

I hear @SenatorLankford used to be a Bible study leader. A worthy calling, but maybe we shouldn't be sending Bible study guys to negotiate with the mafia. That's like sending a dance instructor to negotiate with Xi Xinping. Is it any surprise Lankford got eaten alive?

I don't think that's it. This paints Lankford as some good-hearted innocent and naif. He's quite the opposite: He's a conniving, Gollum-like servitor of the Regime, dressing up his gonzo devotion to transnational progressivism and the WEF as "Christian" missionary work.


My thoughts exactly:

Jesse Kelly
@JesseKellyDC

James Lankford must be politically destroyed for this border bill. I don't just say that because of my extreme malice towards Senator Naked Ken Doll.

It's important for other GOP senators see the career of @jameslankford end because of this.

We must make an example of him.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:05 PM | Comments (514) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition

monkeyvote.jpg

Late last year the Heartland Institute commissioned a poll examining the reality of the mail-in voting fiasco. They released the results in December, and even this jaded blogger was shocked.

A new poll by The Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports found one-in-five voters who cast mail-in ballots during the 2020 presidential election admit to participating in at least one kind of voter fraud.

We had Jim Lakely from the Heartland Institute on CJN Speaks to discuss the poll and what it actually meant for the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Taken together, the results of these survey questions appear to show that voter fraud was widespread in the 2020 election, especially among those who cast mail-in ballots.

Well, today it gets worse. Heartland Institute has done a follow-up analysis of that poll, and Lakely shared the results with CJN last week.

This policy study takes the results of the Heartland/Rasmussen survey and applies them directly to the six swing states that Biden won by razor-thin margins in 2020: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Because Biden voters cast mail-in ballots at a much higher rate than Trump voters, any level of fraud almost certainly benefited Biden to a significantly greater degree than Trump.

It was released to the public a couple of hours ago, and it is worth a read.
Who Really Won The 2020 Election is a careful statistical analysis of the vote, making rational assumptions about the fraud. Their December report detailed the astounding rate of voter fraud, with 28.2% of respondents admitting to at least one of the four types of fraud asked about in the survey. From that high number they interpolate down to 1% fraud...

In addition to the 28.2% fraud scenario, the study analyzes the electoral results for every fraud integer from 27% down to 1%. In every instance except the 3%, 2%, and 1% fraud scenarios, our results indicate that Trump would have won the Electoral College in the 2020 U.S. presidential election had fraudulent mail-in ballots not been counted. Hence, even if the level of fraud detected in the Heartland/Rasmussen survey (28.2% of all mail-in ballots) substantially overstated voter fraud by multiple orders of magnitude, Trump would likely still have won the 2020 election.

But let's get back to those assumptions! Democrat voters used mail-in balloting at a much higher rate than Republican voters in the 2020 election, so the fraud for Biden was at a much higher rate. There is no other way to interpret those data!

Read the whole thing. In addition to its logical explanation of exactly how the steal that we all assumed actually happened, it is a glimpse into the shift away from direct and personal participation in the electoral process. The physical act of voting at one's local voting place was an integral part of American culture, and it was almost celebratory. The data suggest that it is still the case among many Republican voters, but the shift is stark among Democrats. Voting has become a communitarian project that effectively removes the individual from the process, and injects a disturbing sense of loss of control...which of course is exactly the goal.

Political machines are nothing new in America...Tammany Hall ran Manhattan for almost 100 years. The Pendergast machine helped make Harry Truman. The Daleys ran Chicago for years. Even the federal government wasn't immune...the WPA and the CCC during the depression was famous for its patronage dispensed by James Farley, FDR's political chief.

But there was at least some value provided in return for those votes. Today's Democrat vote-stealing machine provides nothing in return to the vast majority of those whose votes are owned by the various organizations that harvest them, steal them, manipulate them...

The policies of the current Democrat party are catastrophic for America, but the traditional Democrat voter fares the worst. The inner cities are inundated with illegals who steal jobs, are responsible for rampant lawlessness, and destroy affordable housing. Yet bringing more in is official Democrat policy. Education has become a grim joke, but the people who need it the most are the ones whose schools are being destroyed by those illegal aliens and an evil alliance between the teachers unions, the academy, and recently the transgender industry...all supported by Democrat government. Inflation? Deficit spending? The regulatory war on small business? Minimum wage? The foreign policy catastrophes that will get our soldiers killed? That all hurts Democrat voters!

The Democrat machine will be the death of America. If there is a violent schism, death and destruction will be cataclysmic. If the status quo continues, our civil liberties will erode to nothing, and our standard of living will collapse under a mountain of unsustainable debt, and a welfare state that can no longer maintain the millions of illegals pouring across our undefended borders.

And that's assuming that our foreign enemies are content to wait for internal forces to destroy us. But there is no guarantee that China or Iran or some other bad actor will see our weakness as a signal to attack.

Voting is fundamental to freedom. Without free and fair elections we are indistinguishable from the dozens of authoritarian countries and tin-pot dictatorships whose elections are rubber stamps for the current juntas.

The Heartland Institute has exposed this mortal danger in a careful, rational, scientific way that supports the obvious. It is incumbent upon us all to take that information and push hard in every direction, so that it never happens again.

Posted by: CBD at 11:00 AM | Comments (356) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Mid-Morning Art Thread

Marsh 10 cents1.jpg

Ten Cents A Dance
Reginald Marsh

Posted by: CBD at 09:30 AM | Comments (381) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Report — 2/6/24

ciaochaofornow.jpg

Good morning, kids. Close on the heels of Speaker Mike Johnson hanging tough and declaring this thermonuclear bird-flip at the last minute scrap of America as founded – this border "security" bill – Mitch McChinlessChiCom has suddenly and rather shockingly hoisted the white flag.

McConnell cited the overwhelming number of Senate Republicans planning to vote against the measure either on substance or because they wanted more time, according to Punchbowl News.

The longtime Republican leader has spoken in favor of the deal and did not express any personal hesitations about the legislation to his colleagues. . . Leaked details of the secretive deal, which McConnell’s chosen Republican lead negotiator Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) and other allies denied, were confirmed Sunday upon the bill’s release. The overwhelming opposition led to McConnell altering his plan Monday night.

Even Lankford, who continued championing the deal leading up to Monday night’s Senate Republican Conference meeting, would not say after the meeting if he would vote to move forward Wednesday on the deal he negotiated, according to the Huffington Post.

A word of caution thinking McCocksucker is surrendering. Think of the many instances during WW2 in the Pacific of cornered Jap soldiers emerging from a cave with a white flag who suddenly raise their arms high – and let two live grenades drop. This is not so much a surrender as it is a tactical retreat on the part of the sputtering, bejoweled globalist fraud.

An unrelenting push for amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens has been going on for decades. I always thought it was a minor miracle that in the waning days of the Dubya debacle, his drive for amnesty was effectively thwarted by a surprisingly effective mass public outcry.

The Democrats obviously want this so they can have a permanent electoral majority; an insurance policy on top of the insurance policy of stealing the elections they can't outright win, as well as the ideological garbage of destroying our culture and national identity from within. All they have to do is turn Texas blue and its really lights out forever. That's not so farfetched a possibility as it once was.

The RINO CoC-suckers want cheap labor and don't care about how they get it. That is until they are ultimately lined up in front of a wall by the same people they thought were the "loyal opposition across the aisle." Fools. That mythical aisle will be erased soon after the border goes, and them along with it once we turn into the Democratic Peoples Republic of . . . not America since that word connotes white people, colonialism, imperialism and every other "ism" including the one beginning with "j."

I assume McChao is trying to figure out who can either be bribed or threatened via the giving or withholding of campaign funding, patronage, etc. As stated yesterday, he needed 9 RINOs to end the filibuster/debate phase, and I counted 7 definites and quite a number of probables that would've put him over the line. But with even Skanford retreating, and my perception that they are losing the messaging/propaganda battle on this, and that Speaker Johnson has called it DOA in the House, we can at least breathe a sigh of relief. For now.

The disaster inflicted on all of us is far and away the #1 with a bullet, pun fully intended, issue on everyone's mind. Taylor Strumpet can flash her pierced mons veneris and endorse Biden to her heart-shaped merkin's delight. But being thin, attractive and whiter than Maris Crane in a blizzard is not going to endear her to throngs of woke racialist BLMsters, and certainly not the majority of normal blacks and others enraged at the crime, disease and economic dislocations 8 million more foreign peasants (with more than a soupçon of military-aged male Chi-Coms and Religion of Peace peaceniks™ are adding to the current raging dumpster fire of societal dissolution.

The thing to remember is, if this bill is dead or even delayed since it is political kryptonite to the Democrats in the run-up to November, the border remains wide open and there is literally zero enforcement of who and what is coming into this country. Our citizenry continue to suffer under an intentional mass crime wave due to the handcuffing of police via non-prosecution of crime and the emptying of jails and prisons. With an open border, the pain and suffering have exploded by orders of magnitude.

The story out of NYC of a cop getting the shit kicked out him by as it turns out four dangerous illegal alien Venezuelan gang members, and then getting set free by Alvin Bragg with no bail and no jail, then flipping the bird at reporters as they headed for parts unknown to commit more mayhem is far from a one-off. But it is emblematic of the anarcho-terrorism that has been unleashed in just the past three years, with no sign of slowing down.

The evil scumbags pulling Joey Sponge-Brain Shits-Pants strings from the Kalorama Klown Komintern Kompound have blood on their hands. They are committing straight up treason with malice aforethought. They deserve to hang for this and I mean quite literally that. And any RINO who supports this should swing right next to them on a communal gallows.

Meanwhile, in another part of the forest, the Kaloramans aided and abetted by their Foggy Bottom bottom-dwelling chums have made this little development possible:

The Islamic Republic of Iran now has enough weapons grade uranium to produce a nuclear weapon within a week, according to a new report.

The Institute for Science and International Security said that the threat level with respect to Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon had entered into its “extreme danger” rating, the first time the threat level has ever gone that high, according to a report obtained by the Free Beacon.

The report said that the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear program has “increased dramatically” since May 2023, in part due to the series of events that have unfolded in the wake of the Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack on Israel.

“The volatile situation in the region is providing Iran with a unique opportunity and increased internal justification for building nuclear weapons while the United States and Israel’s resources to detect and deter Iran from succeeding are stretched thin,” the report said. “The ongoing conflicts are leading to the neglect of the Iranian nuclear threat at a time when Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities have never been greater.”

. . . The most alarming area of concern that the report identified was the nuclear breakout time for Iran, which refers to the amount of time that it would take the country to develop a nuclear weapon given its current capabilities.

“If Iran wanted to further enrich its 60 percent enriched uranium up to 90 percent weapon-grade uranium (WGU), used in Iran’s known nuclear weapons designs from the Amad Plan, it could do so quickly,” the report said. “It can break out and produce enough weapon-grade enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in a week, using only a fraction of its 60 percent enriched uranium. This breakout could be difficult for inspectors to detect promptly, if Iran took steps to delay inspectors’ access.”

. . . Rebeccah Heinrichs, senior fellow at Hudson Institute and the director of its Keystone Defense Initiative, highlighted how [the] notion [that] the Obama-Biden Iran nuclear [deal] was supposed to “moderate” the Iranians was a farce.

“Instead it flushed it with cash and Iran invested in its terrorism missions and its military,” she said. “Now it’s exporting weapons across the world, driving the proxy attacks against US forces, and advancing its nuclear program. Biden’s attempts to resurrect the disastrous deal and placate the Iran regime by waiving sanctions has resulted in a more capable, violent, and defiant regime.”

Four years ago, Iran was on the ropes thanks to the policies of President Trump. Four years later, Iran is perhaps weeks or even days away now of a nuclear breakout. And Joey Sponge-Brain Shits-Pants has to both pretend to confront Iran over its de facto blockade of the Suez Canal/Red Sea trade route and attacks on our troops in the region while fellating the mullahs because they are doing all they can to make them the regional power in the Middle East. Israel be damned. Literally.

Israel has vowed that Iran will never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons. So is Biden going to have to assist Israel (along with the Saudis and GCC) in a potential first strike, especially now that he's been forced to militarily confront them in retaliation for killing US servicemen (which is funny since he or the Muslim plants all over the DoD and CIA are tipping them off either with or without his approval!), or will he tip off the Iranians should he be privy to their plans?

That might be a moot point. Remember: Venezuela is one of Iran's closest allies. Iran for decades has caused trouble in Latin America. Think back to the terror bombing of the Buenos Aires AMIA Jewish Community Center. Turns out that none other than Qassem Soleimani, who Trump vaporized four years ago, was the mastermind behind that bombing.

In any case, with a wide open border for the past three years, Iran might decide to test the lethality of its uranium not on Tel Aviv, but somewhere here with a radiological dirty bomb.

But Trump said "pussy."

    ABOVE THE FOLD, BREAKING, NOTEWORTHY

  • "The question is: what can we do about it? Is there some way, at great cost and much turmoil, to set about shoring up the retaining wall between prosperity and destitution, between freedom and servitude, between democratic governance and centralized authority, between free markets and command economies, between the good of equality and the evil of equity, between sanity and madness? Clearly, surrender is not an option."
    The Retaining Wall
  • "Lawyers are being forced to defend their livelihoods before bar associations and ethics boards — not for obvious misconduct, but after opposing Democrats."
    Democrats Work to Strip All Opponents of Representation in Court
  • "Consequences await." (The question is, for them or for us? - jjs)
    Why Do Western Leaders Hate Their Citizens?
  • Dennis Prager: "In 2001, following 9/11, the great black Chicago Cubs player Sammy Sosa hit a home run and ran around the bases waving a small American flag. Fifteen years later, Colin Kaepernick took a knee during the playing of the national anthem. The Left, led by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, the Democrat Party, the media, the schools and universities, had done their damage. So, now we play two 'national anthems.' E Pluribus Unum is dead. For the Left, another touchdown."
    The Super Bowl Will Again Feature Two "National Anthems"
  • "Generally speaking, yes, it is, but when you drill down, the airlines’ escalating 'social justice' policies suggest that things are going to get worse, not better."
    Is It Safe To Fly?

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 07:40 AM | Comments (417) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Daily Tech News 6 February 2024

Top Story

Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM | Comments (217) | Trackbacks (Suck)

February 05, 2024

Monday Overnight Open Thread (2/5/24)

2 5 24 0nt.jpg


***


The Quotes of The Day


Quote I

“With the prison ecosystem feeling the effects of society’s inflation,” he writes, “the poor get poorer and then the poor get desperate.” Shakeil Price, an incarcerated man in New Jersey state
Jeepers, I wonder what that inflation is for people on the outside. Can't do the time? Don't do the crime.


Quote II

“The U.S. State Department role in all of this has been a colossal embarrassment and this promotion is just another slap in the face to the veteran population.Instead of being held to account and relieved her duties [Jacobson] was promoted.”> Retired U.S. Army Lt. Colonel Scott Mann


Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at 10:00 PM | Comments (371) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Furcible Entry Cafe

switchbackzionnationalpark.jpg
Zion National Park
@theutahtraveler

Uber for kittens.

Hot entry drill.

Barking and entering.

Purrkour.

Criminal mayhem.

Daddy dog and kitten.

Dogs playing tag.

Mother elephant can't wake her unconscious son so asks for help from the zookeepers.

Not quite sunny Switzerland, but maybe late April.

Taking your horse to the beach.

High jumping off a ruin in Naples.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 07:24 PM | Comments (308) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Joy Reid: The Economy Under Biden Is Doing Gangbusters Compared to Trump's Economy

Earlier I mentioned the all-out, absurd lie offensive, directed by the White House itself, which has been insisting that "Bidenomics" has delivered hugely for the American people, despite reports from the ground.

Joy Reid is one of the stupidest fake commentators on the air, and has no thoughts of her own (except for nasty racism), so of course she was eager to let Biden do her homework for her and just read from the Puppet Show Script.

The co-host of "The View" decided to talk economics on today's episode of the progressive television show. During the segment, Reid stated that Americans should be thankful for the current state of our economy, especially when compared to what we experienced under Trump.

"On the facts, the economy is far better than it was under Donald Trump," Reid said.

I'm not sure if she's remembering that time frame correctly. But hey, when you're in the middle of a progressive tirade, don't let reality get in your way (we'll examine that claim in a minute).

Reid continued, stating that Trump's handling of the COVID pandemic caused Americans to lose money and even die.

"He was hit with one big crisis, and he flubbed it so thoroughly, we were at 14 percent unemployment," Reid said. "A million people died because of him. And yet you have people saying," I had more money, I was richer under Trump." Not true, not possible."

Oh, and she's wearing the Problematic Lesbian DangerHair, too. Russians probably #Hacked her wig.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:12 PM | Comments (242) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Nikki Haley Attacks Trump on Leftwing Propaganda Show SNL To Prove What a Real Conservative She Is

Some real McCain energy here.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 05:10 PM | Comments (243) | Trackbacks (Suck)

"The Border Never Closes:" Democrat Senator Chris Murphy Admits The Border "Deal," Which Biden Claims Authorizes Him to Close the Border, Will Never, Ever Close the Border

Chris Murphy brags about how pro-immigration the "deal" is. I believe this part of it.


Chris Murphy
@ChrisMurphyCT

Minutes ago, the text of the bipartisan national security funding bill was released. It:

-funds Ukraine, Israel, and humanitarian relief
-secures our border and reforms our asylum law

1/ As the co-author of the immigration provisions, here's a THREAD on the key elements:


2/ First - it would be easy to just keep immigration and border policy as a political cudgel for another 40 years. But politics at its best is about finding bipartisan compromise on the toughest issues. That's what we've done here.

Here's a snapshot of what's in the bill.

It's "bipartisan" because Corporate Fake Republicans like McConnell and Lankford and Thune and Corwyn are and always have been open borders fanatics who must be driven from office if the Republic is to be saved.


Chris Murphy
@ChrisMurphyCT

3/ A quicker, fairer asylum process. No more 10 yr wait. Claims processed in a non-detained, non-adversarial way in 6 months.

Non-adversarial proceedings = no one checking the illegals' fake claims of political persecution which makes them eligible for asylum.

As Brett Weinstein said (see the sidebar), these illegal aliens make no claims of political persecution when en route to the US. They all admit they're crossing the border for economic reasons. It's only when they get to the border and are given a guide to defrauding the US government and its citizens by leftwing Soros-funded NGOs that they discover they're supposed to lie and claim they're seeking political asylum.

A slightly higher asylum screening standard at the border.

"Slightly." LOL.

Also, no more waiting for work permits. Most asylum seekers can work immediately.

So there's even more incentive to illegally cross the border and make false political asylum claims?


4/ A brand new right to legal representation for all immigrants. Remember when Trump denied lawyers to victims of the Muslim ban? Never again.

Perfect! No one can be denied entry again -- and if we do deny a terrorist entry, we have to pay for their lawyer to fight the denial.

And...the first ever government paid-for lawyers for young unaccompanied minors. A long standing injustice righted.

Boy this "deal" sure seems awfully stacked on the "benefits for illegals" side of the "deal."

Here's "the border never closes" line: He makes it clear that even when illegals exceed 5,000 per day (or 150,000 per 30-day month, 20,000 higher than the absolute peak monthly illegal immigration under Trump), the border is not closed. Illegals are just processed at official ports of entry rather than ad hoc at the border.


5/ A requirement the President to funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when more than 5,000 people cross a day. The border never closes, but claims must be processed at the ports.

It's not even closing the border, as Biden has repeatedly claimed it was -- it's just "funneling" the illegals to official points of entry, where the law already requires aliens to enter through.

Now Murphy admits that this power merely to "funnel" illegals to ports of entry is only usable a "limited number of days per year."


This allows for a more a more orderly, humane asylum processing system.

6/ But...important checks on that power. It can only be used for a limited number of days per year. It sunsets in 3 years. Emergency cases that show up in between the ports still need to be accepted. The ports must process a minimum of 1400 claims a day.

Ah-ha! Even when Biden "closes the border," which Murphy admits never happens, but instead just results in claims being processed at ports of entry, exceptions are still made for "emergency cases!"

And all of these people are already lying about being political asylum seekers! But they'll never be coached into also claiming "emergency" status, huh?

This nasty skull-faced catamite James Lankford is in full-court lying mode:


Sen. James Lankford
@SenatorLankford

The Border Emergency Authority has been the most misunderstood or maybe just misrepresented parts of the bill. Some people have said it would mean 5,000 people a day are coming into the country every day. That is absurd and untrue


The emergency authority is not designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and turn 5,000 people around.

Really?

itsinthebill5000.jpg

Where is the language about turning this 5000/day away from the border? It's not there. You mean that if there are more than 5000 per day, that excess can be turned away -- but your Democrat co-conspirator Chris Murphy admits that doesn't result in anyone being turned away, but merely "funneled to ports of entry."

And setting a 5,000/per day level as "acceptable" is encoding into law the idea that around 2 million illegals per year (5000 x 365) are permitted to enter the country illegally without suffering any consequence.

This disreputable scumbag continues:


The Border Emergency Authority only lasts 3 yrs to force this Admin to shut down the border & to give time for the next POTUS to hire more agents & more officers. After three years, the emergency authority expires because we should have regained full control of our border by then

Yeahhhhhhh right.

I don't want to start any rumors, but James Lankford looks like the kind of guy who funnels illegal trespassers into his own ports of entry, if you catch my meaning.

langfordpussyskinny.jpg


Julio Rosas
@Julio_Rosas11

I've been covering the border since 2019 and this border bill is exactly what's wrong with how D.C. tries to "fix" a problem: Spends more money, gives more power to the feds, and doesn't actually solve the problem.

Again, a bill from Congress is not needed to solve the acute problem at the border. Biden just needs to undo the executive orders he signed on day one. The historic influx of illegal immigrants was started by the policies his administration has recklessly pursued.

Nick Searcy, iNSURRECTIONAL FILM & TELEVISION STAR
@yesnicksearcy

You are compromised and you have been exposed. No one will ever believe you again.

Mike Johnson restates: this bill says "the border never closes," despite Biden's and Lankford's claims to the contrary, and is dead on arrival.


Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson

I've seen enough. This bill is even worse than we expected, and won't come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, "the border never closes."

If this bill reaches the House, it will be dead on arrival.

Neoliberal tough-guy Dan Crenshaw, on the other hand, is mocking people opposed to the bill, calling their claims "bizarre."


Dan Crenshaw
@DanCrenshawTX
Unfortunately there's a lot of emotion about this border deal and no analysis of the facts by people who should know better. Many people (who are apparently very fast readers!) have already tweeted completely false statements about the legislation.

Gonna be a great week, lol!

"lol." Fucking scumbag.

Tune in for an objective look at this border deal as I read through it. Just facts. Not emotion.

It's important to address some of the more bizarre concerns right away.

"Why do we need new laws? Isn't current law enough?"

Obviously we do need new laws. That's why Republicans passed HR2, which was mostly new immigration law. Those advocating for HR2 can't also claim we don't need new laws. This bill isn't HR2, but my simple standard will be "does it decrease illegal immigration or not?"

And if we didn't need new laws, why was immigration so out of control even when Trump was President? Our laws have too many loopholes. Trump had to make an international agreement with Mexico to get the border under control.

It surprises me that I have to say this, but I will: WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO RELY ON MEXICO TO SECURE OUR BORDER.

We should be able to rely on laws that are clear enough so that no President can bypass them.

This is so stupid -- people are saying "we don't need new laws" to rebut Biden's claim he needs legal authority to enforce the border. He already has that authority -- he is currently choosing not to use that authority.

He wants goodies for illegals in exchange for... well, for nothing. While this bill gives him the authority to close the border -- I mean, funnel illegals to ports of entry -- when and only when illegal crossings exceed 5000 per day, nothing in the law requires him to exercise this authority.

We are granting Biden and Schumer everything they want, and in exchange, we give Biden discretionary authority to close the border -- I mean, funnel illegals to ports of entry -- if he feels like using it.

Thusfar in his presidency, he has not chosen to enforce the border at all. He's actually taken Texas to court for daring to seal off parts of their own border!

Why would Eyepatch John McCain think he can lie to us and make us believe Biden's going to become Joe Border Hawk with this discretionary authority?

Which is barely any new authority at all! If more than 5000 illegals cross in one day, Biden can -- if he feels like it -- "funnel excess illegals to official ports of entry."

How does this help protect the border?

It doesn't. It makes it officially open.

And fuck this neocon cunt for pretending otherwise.

Is there no one in his district who will man up and run against him?

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 03:54 PM | Comments (399) | Trackbacks (Suck)

A Pack of Evil Illegal Aliens Beat Up NYC Cops; Soros DA Alvin Bragg Immediately Let Them Out of Jail, So They Hopped on a Bus and Fled the Jurisdiction

Doing the Wilding Americans just won't do.

I apologize for the "antisemitism," according to the ADL and various internet censors paid by George Soros, inherent in accurately reporting the information that George Soros paid money to elect the tough-on-citizens DA Alvin Bragg. It's an "antisemitic trope" to note that any Jewish person plays any role whatsoever in politics, unless you're giving them an award for their involvement in politics. If you're criticizing them, it's an antisemitic trope and a hate crime. Even if the Jewish person in question is not Jewish, has not been Jewish since he was like six years old, and in fact readily admits to assisting the Nazis in finding the artworks of Jewish people to loot.

Oh, George Soros' various censorship groups state that the latter fact is also "disinformation," despite him freely admitting his assistance to the Nazis in a 1988 interview with 60 Minutes.

See, for example, USAToday, which claims this is "disinformation" because, while Soros did in fact inventory the art in Jewish homes so that Nazis could loot it, he did not loot it himself, which no one accused him of doing but which USAToday and other Soros fronts claim he's being accused of so that this non-claim can be debunked.

Note also that when you cite to them George Soros admitting his collaboration on videotape, they say that this is still false, because George Soros was WRONG when he admitted collaboration, because a biography written by someone else about him says he can find no evidence of any collaboration.


Except for George Soros' admission, but, you know. TRUST THE EXPERTS! (George Soros is not a credential expert in narrating the facts of his own life. Only a socialist simp depicting him as a hero is an expert.)

George Soros' admission was itself disinformation, and if you cite George Soros' own words, then you are spreading disinformation, according to the "anti-disinformation" censorship groups funded by (checks notes) George Soros.

Got it, anti-semites?

Also, I did mention this story already, but it's worth more than a mention in a Quick Tsit.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 02:40 PM | Comments (489) | Trackbacks (Suck)

"Take Back Our Country" Convoy Arrives In Texas

I'm enjoying the revolt of the truckers. (And in Europe, the revolt of the farmers.)

The Take Back Our Border convoy has traveled across the United States to bring attention to the border crisis and the reality of "open border policies."

Take Back Our Border leader Dr. Pete Chambers and Senate candidate Ben Luna, R-N.M., joined "Fox & Friends First" Friday to sound the alarm about the growing crisis, including the drugs coming across the border.

"The fentanyl is, I call it, a chemical warfare across the border. The drug trade is tremendous," said Chambers, an Army veteran.

Speaking from near Austin, Texas, a woman participating in the convoy said Americans should be alarmed at the number of "single, military-age men" who are entering the country.

"This is an invasion and our country can't sustain this... We wonder, why are you allowing this to happen in our country?" she asked.

Chambers told host Todd Piro that he believes the goal of the ongoing border policies under the Biden administration is "complete destabilization," which he said is overwhelming the system.

The noted Globalist Establishment Shill Homosexual Groomer Ron DeSantis just sent more troops and cops to help defend the border -- from Biden.

Gov. Ron DeSantis will deploy as many as 1,000 Florida National Guard troops, plus members of his Florida State Guard and law enforcement officers, to back up Texas in its standoff with the Biden administration over the U.S.-Mexico border.

The governor, who long has complained about border enforcement, announced the deployment Thursday during a news conference in Jacksonville, flanked by uniformed law officers and military personnel. He didn't say exactly how many people will make the trip.
Gov Ron DeSantis announced on Feb. 1, 2024, that he's sending National Guard and Florida State Guard troops to help control the Texas-Mexico border. Source: Screenshot/Florida Channel

"It's sad that you don't have a president willing to just put his foot down and say I'm not going to let this happen to my country. But in the absence of that leadership and the face of dereliction of duty we're going to step up and do our job," DeSantis said.

The fresh troops will join 90 officers of the Florida Highway Patrol, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and Florida Department of Law Enforcement that DeSantis has already deployed to the border, according to numbers provided by the governor's office.

Meanwhile, the GOP forced the Democrats to take another "walk the plank" vote. The newest proposal -- which should already be a law -- is to make DUI a deportable offense.

150 Democrats voted against it, because protecting illegal alien drunk driving killers is more important than protecting American lives.

Illegal alien drunk driving killers are higher on the "victim pyramid," doncha know. Murdered Americans? Quite a bit lower.

Over one hundred Democrats voted against a bill intending to deport illegal migrants caught driving under the influence (DUI).

The bill, titled Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act, passed the House with a 274-150 vote, with all voting against the legislation being Democrats, according to the roll call vote. Fifty-nine Democrats joined all 215 Republicans to vote in favor of the legislation.

Some of the Democrats who voted in favor of the legislation include Reps. Henry Cuellar and Colin Allred of Texas, Pennsylvania Rep. Brendan Foyle, California Rep. Jimmy Panetta and New York Rep. Patrick Ryan.

The bill makes driving while impaired grounds for barring a non-U.S. national from entry into the U.S. and for deportation, according to the legislation's description. The individual must be convicted of the offense to be subjected to deportation.

...

Republican North Carolina Rep. Greg Murphy cited an incident where Jose Guadalupe Menjivar-Alas, an illegal migrant from El Salvador, killed a 47-year-old mother and her 16-year-old son while driving under the influence in December. Before the incident, Menjivar-Alas had been deported four separate times after entering the U.S. undetected, according to exclusive reporting by the Daily Caller News Foundation. (RELATED: Illegal Immigrant Deported Five Times Sentenced For Third DUI)

"This month, an illegal immigrant who had been drinking and driving killed a family. This individual had been deported 4 times and arrested 3 times on DUI suspicion," Murphy said.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 01:40 PM | Comments (535) | Trackbacks (Suck)

NBC "News" Poll: "Biden's Presidency in Peril, Declined In Every Measure"

At the behest of the delusionary White House, the left is ginning up the most desperate campaign of overpraising Joe Biden -- claiming he's the most successful president in history. It's so incredible it sounds like they're being sarcastic.


Adam Carolla was nigh-apoplectic over the "narcissistic sociopath" Gavin Newsom making this claim about Joe Biden.

Maybe they think the key to beating Trump is to engage in Trumpian puffery, wowing listeners with a litany of dubious superlatives?

I don't know. But the public isn't buying the "Joe Biden is the most successful president in history" Soviet propaganda campaign.


President Joe Biden hit yet another new low in his approval rating (37%) in the latest NBC News poll released Sunday, raising concern of the Democrat pollster, who said the "damning" results show "a presidency in peril."

Former President Donald Trump not only leads Biden by 5 points (47%-42%) in the national poll, but also leads by big margins:

23 points on mental and physical health to be president (46%-23%)

22 points on handling the economy (55%-33%)

21 points on dealing with crime and violence (50%-29%)

16 points on being competent and effective (48%-32%)

11 points on improving America's standing in the world (47%-36%)

35 points on securing the southern border (57%-22%)

Illegal immigration has been widely deemed the No. 1 voting issue, according to exit polls in the early GOP primary states.

47% is close to where I'd say that Trump needs to be -- about 48% will win this race.

"What is most concerning is the erosion of Biden's standing against Trump compared to four years ago," Democrat pollster Jeff Horwitt of Hart Research Associates told NBC News.

"On every measure compared to 2020, Biden has declined. Most damning, the belief that Biden is more likely to be up to the job -- the chief tenet of the Biden candidacy -- has evaporated."


...

With 73% of registered voters say the U.S. is on the wrong track under Biden, the only silver lining for the sitting president and Horwitt is there remains time to turn the numbers back around.

"Biden can take solace that we are in January and not October 2024," Horwitt added. "At this stage in prior cycles, attitudes can change."


He's doubling down on all of his current policies. How can he change them, given that he is, according to the White House and its surrogates, "the most successful president in the history of the United States"??!


A conviction of Trump won't do it for Biden:


Biden backers might have to hope for a conviction of Trump on one of the four indictments he faces. If Trump is convicted of a felony, Biden actually leads Trump by 2 points (45%-43%), but that is a statistical tie within the margin of error.

This is tough:

[B]iden's campaign made its case in 2020 on being more competent and effective, but that advantage is now squarely in Trump's favor by 16 points, according to the poll. It is a 25-point swing from June 2020 -- the height of the George Floyd riots and COVID-19 pandemic backlash.

Much more at the link. I can't quote all the goodness.


John Nolte:

Nationally, Trump leads Biden by a stunning (in this poll -- see the closing paragraph) five points, 47 to 42 percent.

That's a nine-point swing in Trump's direction since July of last year when Biden was up four, 49 to 45 percent.

...


Currently, only 35 percent of Hispanics, 29 percent of young people (18-34), and 27 percent of Independents approve of the job Biden's doing.

For contrast, in this same poll in early 2020, Trump had an approval rating of 46 percent and still lost (allegedly).


...

On the general question of favorability, only 36 percent view Biden favorably, while 54 percent view him unfavorably. That puts him underwater -18 points.

Trump's favorable/unfavorable rating of 38/52 is four net points healthier at -14 points.

More at the link.

Posted by: Disinformation Expert Ace at 12:15 PM | Comments (596) | Trackbacks (Suck)

THE MORNING RANT: The Trans-Children Era is About to Be Memory-Holed & the Perpetrators Will Be Disavowing Involvement

The trans-children social contagion is soon to be memory-holed, and a day is coming when it will be hard to find any politician or person of authority who will acknowledge having supported this atrocity.

There will need to be accountability.

Obviously, those who operated the gender abattoirs should be imprisoned for their grisly mutilation of healthy children, as should those who diagnosed healthy children as needing to be butchered and sterilized. As for those who simply advocated for child gender transitions, they must not be able to whitewash their records. They have rendered themselves unfit for any role in public policy.

Expect there to be a massive scrubbing of social media and professional records by those needing to distance themselves from their advocacy for or involvement in “gender affirming care” for minors.

With growing revulsion to the child mutilation industry, and with it clearly being a political loser for Democrats, the New York Times ran an opinion piece last week that would have been unthinkable even a year ago.

“As Kids, They Thought They Were Trans. They No Longer Do” [NY Times – 02/02/2024]

NY Times - Kids Trans - Twitter.JPG

Ace ran a piece last week which quoted significant parts of this shocking NY Times piece, and it is receiving much coverage throughout all media, so I won’t bother quoting any of it. Instead, I’d like to discuss the significance of it, which is that the NY Times is alerting the left that it’s time to abandon transgenderism.

Coddled Affluent Libs back Away.JPG

As passionate as affluent white liberals are about transing children, much of the Democrats’ coalition is repulsed by this act of human sacrifice. A few weeks ago, the New Hampshire House of Representatives passed legislation banning child gender surgeries. A dozen Democrats crossed party lines to support the ban, including Rep. Jonah Wheeler, who is black.

Posted by: Buck Throckmorton at 11:00 AM | Comments (391) | Trackbacks (Suck)

Mid-Morning Art Thread

Copley Bourne.jpg

Mrs. Sylvanus Bourne
John Singleton Copley

My favorite American portraitist.

Posted by: CBD at 09:30 AM | Comments (336) | Trackbacks (Suck)

The Morning Report — 2/5/24

bisomething.jpg

Good morning, kids. Of course the big story is the Konfederate Kabuki Kongress koming together in bipartisanship – YAY! – to craft a bill that "solves" our border crisis. The good news? It's only 370 pages long so even the Claudine Gay-educated pages and interns can chug a few cases of Jolt! Cola to stay up all night and read the whole thing without Cliffs Notes to tell their bosses if they should like it or not. And, of course, they should. I mean, what's not to like?!

The bill is being marketed as a “national security” bill as it seeks to overcome opposition by Republican legislators whose election depends on the enthusiastic turnout of ordinary populists who are worried about migration’s lawlessness, pocketbook damage, crime, overcrowding, and chaotic diversity.

However, Democrats are touting the bill as a fix for [so-called quote-unquote "president"] Joe Biden’s terrible poll numbers in the 2024 election.

The establishment authors of the bill have largely hidden its contents — along with many possible loopholes, exceptions, modifications, and caveats that can turn apparent restrictions into government-funded welcomes.

The bill was assembled behind closed doors by a tight circle of establishment advocates — and their business donors. They include Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who appointed three senators to negotiate a plan with the White House.

This "bill" is the COVID-19 injection of mercury-laced absinthe of Jonestown Kool-Aids. Aside from the fact that it allows something like 8,500 illegals to still come in every single day before any so-called "triggers" halt the flow, temporarily, this little nugget shows you how fucking disgusting and despicable this whole charade is:

The bill, negotiated by Sens. James Lankford (R-OK), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), would give Ukraine nearly $50 billion in U.S. tax dollars to defend its borders from Russian invasion. At the same time, the bill spends just $650 million “to build and reinforce miles and miles of new border wall,” according to Lankford’s office. That funding is likely to build only a couple dozen miles of border wall.

For those not up for math this morning, Ukraine will be getting about 75 times the money that we will supposedly get to "build the dang fence!" as soon-to-be-interred John McCain would say. That is of course assuming that $50 billion doesn't wind up mostly in Zelensky's bank account. Ditto the $650 million dollars winding up mostly in some Left wing organization(s) coffers.

There are more holes in this bill than in Joey Sponge-Brain Shits-Pants sponge of a Swiss cheese of a medulla oblongata. All this is, is as I've highlighted above: fake political cover to show Biden solving the crisis on the border – the number one, far and away, biggest issue of this election. Thing of it is, the crisis is of Biden/Obama's own creation. They intentionally erased the border and any immigration controls to flood the country with nearly 8 million unvetted foreigners, which will probably hit at least 9 million by the time the election day rolls around.

No laws are needed to stop this. We have all the laws in place to stop this now. What we have is a stooge traitor in the Oval Office abrogating his oath of office and endangering our national security and public safety with malice aforethought for political gain. As bad as that is are those who are engaging in this transparent fraud via the kabuki-bukkake theatrics of this "bill" to fix this alleged surprise crisis that supposedly sprang out of nowhere.

Speaker Mike Johnson is declaring it DOA should it pass the Senate and go to the House. Let's hope and pray this is the case. The fact that it is even being taken seriously on our alleged side of the aisle in the Senate is proof positive that the GOP if it isn't dead to us now is barely breathing. Check that. It's un-dead and directly coming after us.

The Dems need 9 RINOs to break the filibuster and pass it. Let's see: McConnell, Romney, Murkowski, Collins, Thune, Blount and Lankford get you 7 surefire Quislings. Graham wants to vote with them but I think is playing his idiocy close to the vest for the moment, despite being a transparent fraud on this issue. They don't call him Grahamnesty for nothing. The other possibles include Ernst, Wicker, Capito and a slew of others who if given the proper motivation, i.e. payoff, will find they too can be bipartisan. Check Conservative Review's Liberty Score at least for the lineup card state by state.

While quite a few governors are standing behind what Greg Abbott is doing in Texas, the entire party should be drawing a giant red line in the sand and declaring a complete moratorium on any and all legislation until the border is sealed and the junta starts rounding up and shipping off everyone they let in since noon on 1/20/21. Of course that's a non-starter.

Meh, why get all worked up? The country is so utterly trashed at this point that it really wouldn't matter much if these amoral criminals dressed up as our representatives did pass this travesty. The damage is done and the republic is dead, for all intents and purposes.

The bottom line is Joe Biden started this and Joe Biden can fix it. Today. With, ironically enough, a pen and a phone. At some point, if he won't do it, then others will be forced to do it. Hello posse comitatus and well-regulate militia. If that happens, then for sure we are in a whole other universe. Maybe that's what's needed. God help us.

And while this insanity is going on unchecked, they're still coming for your children, if not coming in and on them.

A sad video that shows a little boy getting puberty blockers is gaining lots of traction online. It’s a heartbreaking clip, and viewers are calling out the transgender ideology for what it really is: "pure evil."

The video was in response to another video that Libs of TikTok shared in which a doctor explained that transgender “care” for kids is “lifesaving.” The video about the little "girl" now has close to 2 million views. In it, a mother and her 11-year-old son Joseph, who they refer to as “Josie,” visit a transgender specialist named Dr. Olsen, who insists that "Josie" is at a “perfect place” to begin puberty blockers to stop the young boy’s body from going through male puberty.

Research has shown that puberty blockers can and do slow or completely stop the development of a child’s reproductive system, as well as the child’s brain and his or her bones. They can cause irreversible damage, but none of that seemed to alarm Josie's mother enough to not go through with the procedure.

During the video, Josie gets the blockers implanted in his arm and cries out in pain from the injection. . .

. . . Josie’s mother was thrilled.

“A lot of time it strikes me that, had this happened 20 years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to give her blockers and she would’ve had to go through male puberty. That terrifies me. I don’t know that she would have survived male puberty,” the child-abusing mother confessed. 

People on X couldn’t agree less. 

“This BOY is being abused by the doctor and his mom. They both belong behind bars,” one user wrote. “The mom is 100% a total enabler,” another insisted while one more called it “pure evil.” Even Elon Musk commented an explanation mark to widen the reach of the heartbreaking video.

The video was part of a three-part segment by NBC News back in 2012 detailing how Josie’s parents began his transition around six years old when he was “diagnosed” with gender dysphoria.

This is pure evil. The poor child should be rescued from its sick, twisted parents who deserve a public horsewhipping. Horrible and insane as the parents may be, where the fuck did the doctors do their residency, with Josef Mengele at Birkenau?!

Of course, in topsy-turvy world, it's the parents who object that feel the hobnailed Manolo Blahniks of the State on their windpipes:

The Twitter account Two Genders One Truth summed up the heartbreaking story of the Hannons, based off a UK Daily Mail article. Young Matthew Hannon’s mother began taking the little boy to a transgender “therapist” when he was only five years’ old (note: the Daily Mail said it had changed names for privacy reasons). It is astounding that 17-year-olds are not considered mature enough to drink alcohol, but five-year-olds are supposed to be capable of deciding to damage their bodies and cross dress in pursuit of the fiction that people can change “genders.”

The worst part is, according to Two Genders One Truth, Matthew’s father Dennis didn’t even know his son was being taken to the “therapist”! Matthew’s mother and father were split up, the Daily Mail explained, and though Matthew’s mother put him in girl’s clothes from the age of three, Dennis knew nothing about it, as the boy did not pretend to be a girl with his father. Dennis accuses Matthew’s mother of pushing their son to identify as transgender. . .

. . . “It's very clear to me that it was all about pushing a narrative. Nobody wanted to question the agenda, or even question whether or not somebody actually had gender dysphoria, it was just, because she said that he was confused about his gender, it must be true,” Dennis said, according to the Daily Mail. He accused Matthew’s mother of “shopping around” until she found a therapist who gave her the woke advice she wanted. “My son is a regular little boy, he goes by Matthew. His mother still tries to influence him by using they/them pronouns, and still calls him B, which is short for Ruby,” Dennis said, noting how difficult it has been at school for Matthew following the previous enforced cross-dressing.

Two Genders One Truth explained:

Dennis is now only able to see his son a few hours a week for the crime of protecting him from medical harm. He  has spent over $150,000 in legal fees and cannot appeal the decision due to lack of funds.

The Daily Mail reported that Dennis Hannon no longer has joint custody or any medical authority over Matthew. The courts sided with the woke mother against both the child and his father. What happened to Matthew was child abuse — yet his only advocate, his father, was the one punished? The transgender insanity is destroying children’s lives.

The State kidnaps the child from an "abusive" parent and then bankrupts the poor guy in the process, because the process is the punishment. At some point, denying a kid's true gender will be joined by political party affiliation, religious affiliation, internet activity, charitable donations etc. etc. etc. Here come the Soviet era psychiatric institutions and cancer wards that Aleksander Solzhenitsyn warned us about.

In fact it's here now with the J-6 protesters still languishing in the Garland Archipelago, and these individuals who foolishly thought the First Amendment applied to them:

Paul Vaughn, one of six pro-lifers facing over a decade in prison over a peaceful protest, told The Daily Wire on Friday that he was ready to go toe-to-toe with the Biden administration after his conviction of two charges related to the FACE Act on Tuesday.

Vaughn said that the Justice Department was attempting to intimidate pro-lifers through legal force, but that their actions had only galvanized pro-lifers around the country. Vaughn and five others face 10.5 years in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines after being convicted in federal court of violating the FACE Act and conspiracy against rights secured by the FACE Act.

“I’d say that I was marginally on the sidelines,” Vaughn told The Daily Wire of his involvement in pro-life activism before his trial. “We were doing a little bit of sidewalk counseling, we weren’t trying to do some national event, we weren’t trying to be a big name, we’re just trying to be Christians and just going out and helping a person here and helping a person there, just live our life in such ways to honor God.”

. . . The charges stemmed from a protest that took place in a hallway outside of a Nashville-area abortion provider on March 5, 2021. On that day, a group of demonstrators gathered on the second floor of an office building in the hallway outside the Carafem Health Center Clinic. The group prayed, sang hymns, and urged women showing up to the clinic not to get abortions. . . Both Vaughn and Crampton said that the Biden [junta] was unjustly targeting pro-lifers while attacks on churches and pregnancy resource centers went un-investigated.

“I don’t think the FBI or the DOJ has any stomach to look who did those things if they’re pro-aborts,” Crampton said.

The FBI and DOJ are now nothing more than Gestapo/Stasi like bureaucracies whose primary function, aside from growing their own budgets and power, is the political persecution of unfavored individuals and groups. That is, anything even remotely to the right of Trotsky.

Where's the GOP on these issues? Hello, Lankford?! Pfft.

TEASER:

You'll recall a month or so ago we reported on a shocking poll from the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen showing 1-in-5 respondents admitted to committing some act of voter fraud in 2020. Well, our friend Jim Lakely at Heartland has a blockbuster follow-up:

  • This Heartland Institute Policy Study applied various levels of mail-in voter fraud to six key swing states in the 2020 presidential election: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

  • The study includes data on what overall percentage of votes in those states were mail-in ballots, what percentage of those mail-in ballots went to Biden or Trump, and what percentage of those mail-in ballots for each candidate were fraudulent. We analyzed these six swing states under 29 different scenarios that incorporate different fraud percentages, including the 28.2 percent number as well as every fraud integer from 27 percent down through 1 percent.

  • Of the 29 scenarios we analyzed, Donald Trump wins the Electoral College in 26 of them. The only levels of mail-in voter fraud in which Joe Biden wins the Electoral College are from 1 to 3 percent. This means that even if the true percentage of fraudulent mail-in ballots were even one-seventh of what our survey found, Trump would still have won.
  • CBD will have much more on this tomorrow and we'll have Jim Lakely on the podcast later this week.

    Stay tuned . . .


    Posted by: J.J. Sefton at 07:54 AM | Comments (340) | Trackbacks (Suck)

    Daily Tech News 5 February 2024

    Top Story


    Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:00 AM | Comments (261) | Trackbacks (Suck)

    << Page 472 >>

    Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.2029 seconds.
    15 queries taking 0.1968 seconds, 25 records returned.
    Page size 94 kb.
    Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.