Ogre's Politics & Views
July 15, 2005
Holy Crap Lions! Tours
Time for a little more on the lighter side for Friday.
If you've been reading blogs for awhile, you may have come across
a post or two that mention the phrase, "Holy crap lions tours," especially on blogs written by members of the
Bad Example Family. To be technically correct, this should read as the title of this post does, "Holy Crap Lions! Tours." If you want to know why, you haven't seen
the video...you should watch the video.
It's completely safe for work, but you HAVE to have speakers. It really doesn't work without them (you will NOT get the effect) - if you don't have speakers, resist the temptation to follow that link until you do -- it will be worth the wait.
And in case you think you might have seen the video, but you're not sure, this picture should remind you:

I have GOT to learn how to make those.
And if you want an illustration of some people who REALLY have too much time on your hands, there's a
live action version of that cartoon. Gah.
Posted by: Ogre at
09:05 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
YOU NEED HELP! But, when you find an affordable place for electroshock therapy, tell me and I'll meet you there.
Posted by: Smoke Eater at July 15, 2005 12:43 PM (WJO7V)
2
Just get on that bus (pictured above) when you see it come by. It goes by my house about twice a week...no, really, I've seen it!
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 12:51 PM (/k+l4)
Posted by: Jay at July 15, 2005 12:58 PM (2FcUc)
4
After all the stuff that goes on in the world, you've got to leave some time to laugh, eh?
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 01:21 PM (/k+l4)
5
Oh the cartoon is THE BEST! I love that thing.
I wanted to post this, but may not have time. When the boys and I were with Eric the other day at the aquarium, Bones leaned over to me and said, "Mom, Mom, Mom, sing Eric the Llama song!" (Like I know it?) I kept telling him that I KNEW Eric had heard the Llama song and he would not believe me. Finally Eric had to tell him he in fact knew of the Llama song. I said to Eric, "I think Ogre would be so proud!" My boys want to ensure everyone has heard the Llama song.

Posted by: Bou at July 15, 2005 05:23 PM (6Zt7D)
6
Did you see the live action one? Whoa.
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:42 PM (L0IGK)
7
Absolutely! I've been all over that site.
Posted by: Bou at July 15, 2005 09:48 PM (QVeYC)
8
Is anyone else disturbed by the fact that that bus has no driver? :-)
Posted by: Harvey at July 16, 2005 02:42 PM (ubhj8)
9
Harvey, you have been watching too many cartoons, I think...
Posted by: Ogre at July 16, 2005 03:12 PM (L0IGK)
10
That cracked me up! Especially the reenactment of the first one!
Posted by: Sissy at July 17, 2005 01:11 PM (uXS+O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mayor McCrory & Education
Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory is the perfect example of what is termed a "RINO" (Republican in Name Only). Each year he runs on the Republican ticket, and he gets the votes of the Republicans. Every year he votes and works for the Democrats, so he gets the votes of the Democrats. He has been mayor of Charlotte since 1995, and he is running again this year, basically unopposed.
As of the writing of this article, his web site does not have any information. However, I heard a clip of his announcement on the radio. He claims he's working to expand light rail (liberal plan), reduce crime (not possible with Democrats on the city council), and tell our children what is acceptable in a polite society (liberal plan).
Well, Mayor (who has absolutely no say or control regarding the schools, that's for the school board) McCrory -- you want to know what's wrong with our schools? How about them encouraging cheating and then insisting that nothing is wrong with it?
Posted by: Ogre at
05:03 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
We operate on a system with three six-week terms per semester. Our district has a policy of "no grades below a 50", on the theory that the lower grades could make it impossible for a kid to ever pass. We teachers don't have a problem with that per se -- except when it comes to the third six-week term. After all, there is no way a student can "recover" from the final term of the semester. What's more, the kids know this, and some figure their average and "slide" during that third term, knowing that they cannot fail the semster if they do so.
And we won't get in to the question of a kid who misses 90% of the semester but ends up with a grade of 50.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at July 20, 2005 09:24 AM (3VVx3)
2
I can see the reasoning behind that sort of system, but I do think it's still dishonest. If the child did 20% of the work the first third, they deserve a 20. If they do 100% of the work the remaining two-thirds, that averages out to 73. Some people aren't supposed to have high school diplomas, and some people simply do not want them. Why do we FORCE people to get them, especially when they have so little meaning anymore?
Posted by: Ogre at July 20, 2005 10:32 AM (/k+l4)
3
"Government schools really do stink?" Excuse me. Which government schools? Where? How, exactly do they stink and why? Does not the fact that someone blew the whistle indicate that at least someone is at least trying to do right within this single school?
Certainly there is administrative stupidity in some schools, but not the majority. If that was true, we would be facing a very real, national disaster. We are not.
If a school board is filled with ninnies, the voters--and here we assume they are not themselves ninnies--have the means to eject them from office and replace them with capable people. That ninnies retain control of school boards is not a comment on the schools and the teachers who struggle mightily to improve them, but on the public who all too often, just don't care.
Posted by: Mike at July 20, 2005 09:23 PM (G5PGV)
4
I went to school in Charlotte back in 74-76. The system was atrocious then. Anyone who had money sent their kids to private school. (We didn't have money.)
One of my closest friends moved to Charlotte five years ago. The system is still atrocious. Two of her kids are in private school. The other is in public school. N- has the math and language skills of an eighth grader but will be graduating this next year. The school passed her in all her classes, despite the fact that she failed most of them, at least by grade.
It's at least as bad as this post describes and I don't see how people can't know it. But they don't act on it. That's obvious. Otherwise, thirty years later, it wouldn't still be terrible.
Posted by: Suzi at July 21, 2005 12:23 AM (3TZQi)
5
Mike -- the fact that someone blew the whistle was good -- but it was a former employee, and the school actually admitted that they lied and cheated, but then declared that NOTHING WAS WRONG. How can anyone consider a system that claims lying and cheating is not wrong is anything but garbage?
Also, I do believe we are facing a national disaster. Take a look at how many people who have high school diplomas from the 21st century that cannot calculate their own overtime pay, find France on a map, or name the second president of the United States.
As for the school board being replaced, you have to realize that the voters do not have that choice. In Mecklenburg County, the school board is ruled by the Democrats who gerrymander districts to absolutely ensure there is zero competition for the school board -- no one else has a chance -- and the elections are rigged in that illegal votes are counted in the very corrupt system.
Suzi, I think the biggest reason people don't act on it is that they don't want to admit "their" school is bad. If they did that, they've have to admit that their child was getting by. It's much easier for people to just look the other way, send them to private school (as you mentioned), or just teach them at home.
It is a horrible, broken, garbage-filled system. Government should absolutely and entirely get out of the business of schooling because they simply cannot do the job. The education system today is about money and power and has absolutely nothing to do with actual education or learning.
Posted by: Ogre at July 21, 2005 07:32 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 14, 2005
ACLU Loves Terrorists
Ok, I changed my mind. Today, instead of just the one post for the ACLU Blogburst, it's a two-for-one special. I read another article and just decided I needed to point out more bad things that the ACLU is doing.
Here in North Carolina, the ACLU
is demanding that terrorists be allowed to swear on the Queer-an in North Carolina courts, because they so despise the Bible. I've got a
Remington 1100 they can swear on if they like.
Look, Freedom of Religion (NOT separation of church and state) has limits, just like the Freedom of Speech. The classic example of the limit on Freedom of Speech is yelling "Fire" in a crowded movie theater. You do not have the right to do that because it is dangerous. Same with libel and slander -- they damage or harm other people, so you simply do not have that right. I wish religion would be treated the same way, but certainly the ACLU wouldn't like that.
I could not form my own religion and base it upon cannibalism (although I'm quite sure the ACLU would support me...at least until I ate them). You can't form a religion that physically endangers people -- that is NOT freedom of religion.
Muslim law
requires Muslims to kill Americans. WHY IS THIS TOLERATED? The Muslim religion wants YOU dead if you are not one of them, no matter where in the world you exist. This is a fact, no matter what you might hear people who claim to be of that religion.
We should not only
not allow the Queer-ran into courtrooms, we should declare this "religion" to be what it is -- beyond freedom of religion and simply dangerous to Americans. But the ACLU loves them. That tells you a lot about what the ACLU thinks of Americans, doesn't it?
Posted by: Ogre at
05:02 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Great job Ogre! LOL! Eat The ACLU!
Posted by: Jay at July 14, 2005 10:02 PM (BKqRl)
2
Shakespeare once said:
"If you would have peace; first, let us kill all the lawyers."
I now amend that statement...
"If you would have peace; first, let us eat all the ACLU!"
Posted by: Meeyotch at July 15, 2005 02:02 AM (MBM+p)
3
mMMMMmmmm...tasty lawyers...
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:28 AM (L0IGK)
4
wow, you're racist.
body of christ - eat - cannibalism
Posted by: dav at July 15, 2005 06:23 AM (yv7XG)
5
I'm sorry, I was unaware that "terrorist" was a race.
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 06:45 AM (/k+l4)
6
hmm, methinks dav=troll ... /TJ
Posted by: TJ at July 15, 2005 09:41 AM (9nwvC)
7
You think? Be he's posted on his blog that it's Bush's fault that children are in poverty, "grandfathers" don't have free healthcare, that some single mothers are unemployed, and that illegal immigrants aren't all provided with 3 free meals a day!
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 10:17 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACLU Hates Freedom
This week the Stop the ACLU Blogburst has a couple of topics. Some of the blogburst members will be mentioning the unbelievable support for murderous child molesters (aka terrorists), while others will be blogging about Supreme Court nominees. I have chosen the latter topic, as it is an area I research a lot.
The ACLU is already
complaining about President George W. Bush's pick for supreme court justice, and he hasn't even made a choice. He hasn't even leaked a list of names for them to attack, and they are already complaining. Unfortunately, this is likely having it's desired effect -- many good and qualified jurists are likely to refuse the nomination simply because they do not want to be vilified by the ACLU, Democrats, and Socialists.
Their
press release of July 1, 2005 needs a little interpretation, so I'll have a go at it in the extended post:
Posted by: Ogre at
01:49 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
ACLU need to have their "CL" taken away.
Posted by: mensaB at July 14, 2005 05:32 PM (TOHVc)
2
I know that the word Communist is used too much, but in the case of the ACLUseless it is the correct word. I thought everyone knew that the ACLUseless is a totally Communist organization, Always has been, always will be. They just use the ACLUseless name to con people without brains into supporting them. Since there is evidently 48% of the population without a brain they have a lot to choose from.
This is not BS, but the history of the ACLUseless. That's why they strive so hard to remove all religion from the public view. Once they accomplish that their doctrine of slavery is easier to push. In a democracy you have the people that have a little, some have quite a bit, and some have a lot. Under communism you only have those that have nothing and those that have it all. People had better wake up before they lose that choice.
Posted by: scrapiron at July 15, 2005 12:04 AM (M7kiy)
3
They need a lot more than that taken away from them, MensaB!
And yes, scrapiron, that's one of my primary goals in joining and participating in the weekly blogburst -- to let people know what the ACLU -- even the stupid people.
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:20 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Celtic Quiz
Owlish claims he is a Hornbeam Tree. I like trees. Therefore, it seemed only logical to see what the silly quiz would have in store for me (sorry Smokey).
What do you know? I'm a tree, too:
You Are A Rowan Tree |

You are full of charm and cheer. You light up a room.
And while you crave attention, you do it without ego.
You are an interesting mix of contradictions - and very unpredictable.
You are both dependent and independent, calm and restless.
You are passionate, emotional, gregarious, and (at times) unforgiving. |
Posted by: Ogre at
12:05 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Cypress Tree:
You are strong, adaptable, and striving to be content.
You're good at taking what life has to give - even if you don't like it.
A passionate lover who can't be satisfied, you are quick tempered at times.
You hate loneliness, want love and affection, and need to be needed.
A bit of a live wire, you love to gain knowledge any cost... and you can be careless at times.
Scary how true this one really is.
Posted by: vw bug at July 14, 2005 02:20 PM (9eW/1)
2
Our crack researchers have been dispatched to check the validity of your claims on the accuracy of that 3rd line...
The second half, people, the second half of the third line!

Posted by: Ogre at July 14, 2005 02:39 PM (/k+l4)
3
A... cheddar tree?? (Oh, that's cedar) ha.
..was this written by somebody at the ACLU? I am ONLY passionate, and it says, NOT. (*'_'*)
Posted by: mensaB at July 14, 2005 05:27 PM (TOHVc)
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:19 AM (L0IGK)
5
I was hazelnut... this quiz sucks. It missed my personality by a hemisphere.
Posted by: Contagion at July 15, 2005 08:37 AM (Q5WxB)
6
"Sometimes you feel like a nut..."
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 08:57 AM (/k+l4)
7
I'm a weeping willow tree.
You are a dreamer, and you're into almost any kind of escapism.
Restless and capricious, you love to travel to exotic places.
You are easily influenced by others, as long as they don't pressure you.
You tend to suffer in love until you find that one loyal, steadfast partner.
An empathetic friend, you love to make others smile and laugh.
Other than the part where it says 'easily influenced' it's pretty much right. I've never been easily influenced. Stubborn has been used to describe me.
BTW, I am laughing at yours. How did you come up on one quiz as this unfeeling uncaring autistic introverted hates people person, but in this one you get 'You are full of charm and cheer. You light up a room'. It must be that interesting mix of contradictions... ;-)
Posted by: Bou at July 15, 2005 05:30 PM (6Zt7D)
8
You mean I can't be uncaring and still be cheerful? Do I light up a room? Ah, I don't care.

Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:44 PM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kennedy vs. Santorum
It seems old Teddy Kennedy is off his medications again. Then again, maybe he's on his own medications. Ted is in a total fit of rage because Senator Rick Santorum dared to step out and tell the truth in print, and then actually stand by what he wrote (so far).
The words of the head loon and chief drunk of the Democrat Party:
His [Santorum's] outrageous and offensive comments -- which he had the indecency to repeat yesterday -- blamed the people of Boston for the depraved behavior of sick individuals who stole the innocence of children in the most horrible way imaginable.
In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, "What a Maroon."
Teddy is simply wrong about what Santorum said, and he's wrong about disputing what Santorum really did say! So, what, exactly, did Santorum say?
Posted by: Ogre at
09:55 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Although I am not a Roman Catholic, I agree with Santorum. Since Teddy does not live his faith as evidenced by his actions and votes, he really had to find something to rail against. You're right, what a maroon.
Posted by: Pat in NC at July 14, 2005 12:04 PM (b98AN)
2
No doubt Ted is off somewhere in la la land. Off the reservation. Bats in the belfry.
PS: no link to the American Flag league?
Truth laid bear is wacko. Think it is dropping lots of links. Should show several to you from me. Crazy
Posted by: William Teach at July 14, 2005 12:30 PM (Pzlrt)
3
He's really out there -- I can only hope it's the last dying throes of liberalism.
Sorry about the American Flag League -- you might notice I'm missing a lot of the blogrolls. It's on the top of my "must do this today list" -- and has been for days. It's coming, I promise!
Posted by: Ogre at July 14, 2005 12:59 PM (/k+l4)
4
ain't no thang. This whole css and html formatting thing is the main reason that I have stayed with Typepad, rather then moving to mu.nu, the times I have been asked. I do not feel like playing with it.
Posted by: William Teach at July 14, 2005 02:47 PM (Pzlrt)
5
I have a brother in law like 'the Diver Ted'. He's in a drunken stupor 24-7 but if the booze runs out even for a short time he goes totally nuts and will say or do anything.
Posted by: scrapiron at July 15, 2005 12:08 AM (M7kiy)
6
Maybe that's what it was -- Teddy's booze supply was running low and he needed some ammo for a fundraiser for the loony liberals in Boston.
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:26 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Charlotte Observer Wets Itself
I don't understand. The Charlotte Observer is socialist. They have very, very socialist and collective views on what Charlotte and North Carolina should be. They are very seriously heavily anti-freedom. They support nearly every socialist and collectivist idea that exists and cheer relentlessly when those ideas are implemented. They also have their friends in power -- in the Charlotte City Council, the Mecklenburg County Council, in the State Legislature, and in the Governor's seat. They are overjoyed this year since all of those groups raised taxes. But they are very unhappy now.
The Observer
whines and complains that there is a state agency that has a goal of "slowing the proliferation of annoying [state] rules." You see the N.C. Rules Review Commission exists to "make sure proposed rules comply with N.C. law," and that absolutely infuriates the Charlotte Observer.
The Observer does not like pesky things like Constitutions, procedures, or laws. They want committees, groups, commissions, and "authorities" to be able to make their own rules, even if those rules violate basic rights or any other law. The Observer complains that this commission "has rejected rules that state commissions spent years carefully drafting." In the mind of the Observer, is a commission spends years drafting rules, it doesn't matter what the law or the Constitution says.
Just keep that in mind when you're reading "news" stories -- usually just opinion pieces on pages other than the page labeled "opinion" -- in the Charlotte Observer. If you like freedom, they honestly hate you.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:01 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Its happening in more places than Charolette.
Posted by: Jay at July 14, 2005 08:09 AM (2FcUc)
2
Scary, isn't it.
I want to be a hermit and leave everyone else alone, but the government won't let me.
Posted by: Ogre at July 14, 2005 08:57 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2005
The British Empire Strikes Back
The Alliance (remember The Alliance), this week asks:
How will the British retaliate for the London bombings?
Well now, I'm quite sure that actual,
real residents of that place can
answer this one better than I, but I'll take a shot anyway.
I like visuals:

Oh wait. I think I mis-read the question. I thought it said, "What would YOU do to retaliate."
Maybe they could call the UN. After all, we all
know how well that works.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:56 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I liked your answer better! LOL! How about you photshop these two images together? Now that would be nice.
Posted by: Jay at July 14, 2005 12:43 AM (BKqRl)
2
If you nuke the U.N, you are certainly a Freedom Fighter, not a Terrorist, but it would be a waste of a perfectly good firework, when a few bullets would suffice.
Thanks for the links, Ogre, and for the craic t'was in it.
Posted by: Sally at July 14, 2005 05:20 PM (vJb9l)
3
Well we've got to do something with all the nukes we've got. We've got enough other things sitting around collecting dust!
Posted by: Ogre at July 15, 2005 05:18 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Perfect Society
Every week Lennie of Cross Blogging posts a question. It's a carnival similar to the Homespun Bloggers weekly question, but usually focused on something to do with real life instead of politics. He encourages everyone to join in answering the questions on their own blogs. So come on, if you've got that writer's block and need a little nudge, head on over, or just post on your blog your answer!
This week's question:
Read this article, then answer the following questions:
1. Why has our society become less loving, so selfish, so intolerant, so uncommitted to anything outside of individual gain?
2. Why are we so full of selfish ambition and vain conceit?
3. Is this “perfect” society a place where any of us would want to live?
My answer is in the extended entry:
Posted by: Ogre at
05:01 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Sorry it took so long to get your post linked. I have been getting spammed a lot lately.
Thanks for answering. Next weeks will be easier. I have to mix them up some to keep you on your toes.
Posted by: Lennie at July 15, 2005 11:04 PM (5kxJX)
2
Keep 'em coming -- this one was the toughest one yet, that's for sure!
Posted by: Ogre at July 16, 2005 08:39 AM (L0IGK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Opinons Wanted
I'm working on the next layout that will appear for this blog. I know that there are still about 20% of the readers of the blog that view using 800x600 settings on their monitor. I usually use 1280x1024. I know there are many blogs that simply do not fit on an 800x600 screen -- they are too wide and you have to scroll horizontally to see all the blog.
I hate having to make the blog fit in only 800x600 when there really is so much extra space out there. I'm seriously considering making 2 different designs, one for people with the 800x600 layout and one for people with larger screens. For you who use 800x600, do you care? Does it matter to you that you have to scroll horizontally on some blogs? Would you tend to visit a place less or do you avoid blogs that are too wide to fit on your screen? Do you just accept the fact that you are using a small screen and you expect to scroll horizontally often?
Thank you for your input.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:48 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
1024x768 is the absolute minimum that I will design a website for. I keep my monitors at maximum resolution; 1600x1200 on one monitor and 1280x1024 on the other at home (I have 2 hooked up to my machine) and 1280x1024 at work.
I understand some people like lower resolutions, but in my opinion you have to accept the consequences of your choices.One consequence is that websites look like crap because of rediculously low monitor resolution, not bad web design.
My blog currently is set up such that (as far as I know) it doesn't look bad at 800x600, but that's because I needed it to look halfway decent at 1024x768 and it just happen to work ok at the lower resolution too.
I understand that my attitude may drive some readers away, but then I don't blog specifically to attract readers.
Soory I don't have any actual recommendations, just my own opinion as a fellow blogger.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at July 13, 2005 04:06 PM (K+h36)
2
Seriously, anyone who is still running 800x600 should be used to disappointment and accept scrolling. IMHO, 1024x768 should be the standard size - even a entry-level laptop less than about 4 years old will support it.
/TJ
PS - besides, I run 1024x768 ... and I rule!
Posted by: TJ at July 13, 2005 04:55 PM (PL7dL)
3
Thank you both for your opinions. I do wonder what computers are being used at 800x600, but clearly they are!
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 05:22 PM (L0IGK)
4
A small scrollbar like the one Zoe's got doesn't bother me at all. I wasn't really crazy about your horizontal blog, but that is completely different. Main thing I like is good content and quick-loading. Hope this helps, bro...
Posted by: Gun-Toting Liberal at July 13, 2005 06:04 PM (Er9BL)
5
Indeed it helps, thanks for the opinion, GTL!
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 06:24 PM (L0IGK)
6
Here's a breakdown (courtesy Awstats) of screen resolutions of the 30K+ visitors I've had so far this year:
1024x768 52.5 %
800x600 13.2 %
1152x864 11.5 %
1280x1024 11.2 %
1280x960 1.6 %
Others 9.8 %
I wonder about the 800x600 users as well.
HTH, MarkT.
Posted by: MarkT at July 13, 2005 06:48 PM (V3uF4)
7
Neat to know I'm not the only one. I'm now at 16.1% 800x600 with a very similar 50.05% at 1024x768. I wonder if I should start tracking some more information specifically about just those 800x600 users...
Thanks for the info!
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 07:17 PM (L0IGK)
8
I used to have to surf 800x600 because the computers at work were still running Win95.
As long as the main column fits on 800x600, a little side-scrolling doesn't matter.
Posted by: Harvey at July 14, 2005 04:47 PM (ubhj8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mid-Week Laughs
VW Bug, over at One Happy Dog Speaks has a neat new site design and new home (mu.nu). I mention this because if you're not visiting there every Wednesday, you're missing the Humor for Dreaded Wednesday post series. If you're like the majority of us working class slaves slobs subjects proletariats people, Wednesday is the halfway point through the work week, so you might like a few laughs on your Wednesday.
I know I look forward to that post every week.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The ten commandments one is priceless.
thanks for the link!
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at July 13, 2005 12:36 PM (vR7Sl)
2
And they really are that good every week!
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 12:46 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Smoke and Go To Jail
Not yet? Certainly very soon. This article in Medical News Today -- a web publication from the UK with no actual names of real people associated with it, for what it's worth -- complains about the lack of ability for people to force others to stop smoking.
They cite a University study that mentions that local health department directors across North Carolina are unsure if they can ban smoking outdoors. Of course, they quickly moved to change the laws in North Carolina, despite the billion-dollar tobacco agreement that limits government from passing such laws, because there are "exceptions" to that "agreement." So very soon, if you smoke outdoors, you will go to jail.
Of course, they claim that these policies are important because "studies have proven that secondhand smoke can increase the likelihood of lung cancer, asthma attacks, heart disease and numerous other serious illnesses." Of course, I can find just as many studies that prove the opposite, but those, apparently, do not matter when you have an agenda.
Second-hand smoke may be unpleasant. It may make your clothes stink. Personally, I cannot stand it. However, it will not give you cancer. It's simply not true, no matter what the "health departments" and others may want you to believe. They are lying to you, because they want to control your life. And you will be punished if you do not conform to their idea of society.
Oh how I seriously yearn for freedom.
The Free State Project looks better and better every day.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:09 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I better make friends with a bailsman. I'll be doing some serious time.
That is just STUPID!! Next thing you know they'll be telling us we can't drink coffee because of the caffine!
Arrggghhhh
Posted by: Tammi at July 13, 2005 07:03 AM (t0y+r)
2
They are WELL on their way down that road, too, Tammi, sadly.
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 07:10 AM (/k+l4)
3
Abolutely freedom stealing insanity!!!
Posted by: Jay at July 13, 2005 07:56 AM (2FcUc)
4
These people are insane. Yes, the Free State Project is looking better and better by the minute.
Posted by: Gun-Toting Liberal at July 13, 2005 02:32 PM (Er9BL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 12, 2005
THE Alliance
I hope that there are days in which new readers who have never seen these pages nor my writing appear and start reading. For those of you who are new and are seeing some strange and rather odd-seeming posts. These are often related to The Alliance. I described The Alliance a number of months ago, but since (I hope) there are new readers since then, a brief introduction seems in order:
From the
Duties and Responsibilities Page:
The goal of the Alliance is to replace Instapundit as the biggest thing in the blogosphere by means of links, hits, and humor, thereby helping Alliance members evolve upward through the Ecosystem .
To help accomplish this, various members of the Alliance attempt to promote traffic and links to other members, through various exercises and blogrolls. Down the left side of this blog, you can see the now rather huge Alliance blogroll -- these are all other blogs that are participating.
In my opinion, one of the most fun things about being in the Alliance is the Alliance assignments. Twice weekly, on Wednesday & Friday nights, the home page of the Alliance is updated with new assignments. Once it is the "Filthy Lie," and the other day it is the "Precision Guided Humor." You can spot those posts of mine by looking for strange and obscure references to Evil Glennn (most of the time) and other silly answers to questions (occasionally at other times and in other posts, too!) -- usually there's a link somewhere back to the Alliance as well.
So, if you want to have some fun, join a fun group of bloggers, and have more subjects to write about (keeps that writer's block at bay pretty well), head on over to the Alliance and read about
How To Join. If you have other questions, see the
FAQ page.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:00 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Homespun Blogger Symposium XXVIII
Time once again to offer the correct an answer for the weekly Homespun Blogger Symposium. This is a group of bloggers who simply aren't professional (there's professionals?), and they have a weekly question, linkfests, best-of posts, and even a radio program. If you're a non-profit blogger just blogging for the fun of it, check them out.
In the meantime, their question for this week:
This week saw terrorism raise it's ugly head in London killing more than 50 people, wounding over 700.
Based on this recent attack...do you feel that we're winning, losing, or holding our own in fighting the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT)?
Posted by: Ogre at
02:04 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
More Llamas
Now yesterday I planned on a little levity for this morning's post, and lo and behold, Harvey beat me to it. It seems he's becoming facinated with llamas as he discusses Cindy's post of llama birthing. I think Harvey's career plans appear to be moving more towards llamahood. So, for those who still haven't managed to stumble upon it, I provide you yet again with:
The llama song.
And the words, just because I can:
Here's a llama, there's a llama
and another little llama,
fuzzy llama, funny llama,
llama, llama, duck.
llama, llama, cheesecake llama,
tablet, brick, potato, llama,
llama, llama, mushroom, llama,
llama, llama, duck.
I was once a treehouse,
I lived in a cake.
But I never saw the way
the orange slayed the rake.
I was only three years dead,
but it told a tale,
and now listen, little child,
to the safety rail.
|
Did you ever see a llama,
kiss a llama on the llama,
llama's llama tastes of llama
llama, llama, duck.
Half a llama, twice the llama,
not a llama, famer, llama,
llama in a car, alarm a llama
llama duck.
Is that how it's told now?
Is it all so old?
Is it made of lemon juice?
Doorknob, ankle, cold
Now my song is getting thin,
I've run out of luck.
Time for me to retire now
and become a duck. |
|
(repeat ad nauseum)
Posted by: Ogre at
10:03 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
*sticks spoon in ear to unwedge song*
Posted by: Harvey at July 12, 2005 12:20 PM (ubhj8)
2
hmmm hmmm hmmm a lllama...
Posted by: Ogre at July 12, 2005 12:56 PM (/k+l4)
3
Two things to say about this.
#1. You are a freak, and your fascination with Llamas is.....ummm...strange, at best.
#2. What is a Llama duck? could you provide us with a photo of one of these? Does it have webbed feet? a bill? feathers?
Is it a quack like you?
Posted by: Jay at July 12, 2005 03:19 PM (Nrq7o)
4
Llama duck is in the video. You have to watch very closely...
Posted by: Ogre at July 12, 2005 04:22 PM (L0IGK)
5
One of those rare times I'm glad I don't have speakers on the computer!!
Oh Dang it! It's in my brain anyway!
**Shakes fist at Ogre** Just you wait!!
;-)
Posted by: Tammi at July 13, 2005 07:05 AM (t0y+r)
6
The llama takeover continues.
Posted by: Ogre at July 13, 2005 07:11 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Education Money
Is there any person, any agency, any company, any government "program" that has enough money? It certainly doesn't seem so. Two different, apparently unrelated new articles point out one of the absolute absurdities of government and government spending.
Article #1, horribly titled "Education Wins Again," absolutely celebrates a NC Supreme Court decision that all fines collected by government must go to the school systems. The author can barely contain his excitement that over $500 million of new money will be given to the school system. At the same time he lamented the quite obvious natural reaction of the legislature -- just shift the spending from one area of the budget to another, making quite literally no different in funding.
At the same time,
Article #2 laments that the very same court decision says that the University of North Carolina system cannot keep the fines they collect, and instead must give them...to the schools. And to compound the utter stupidity, the school has been setting aside these collections since 2001 in anticipation of this decision, but they will adamantly fight having to pay the money.
Government is way to big and far too out of control. Nothing about this setup makes any sense. Since the government schools are now going to very suddenly get $500 million in new money, will the lottery disappear? That was supposed to only generate around $300 million for schools. Will the government schools get a sudden influx of over $800 million? How much of the $10 million that the University needs to give to the government will the government turn around and give back to them?
We need a new government. A Constitutional Republic would be nice. Anyone want to start one with me?
Posted by: Ogre at
05:01 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I love the ruling. Fines are to encourage you to do the right thing; eg turn your books in on time, park where you're supposed to. If the guy who fines you gets to keep the money he has an incentive to fine unjustly. I think this is even more true with police RICO seisures. If they get to keep your property on a "good faith" belief that you are a crook (without going to court) they have every incentive to make a mockery of justice.
Posted by: clark at July 12, 2005 07:49 AM (KtfjS)
2
Oh, there's no question the ruling was correct. I am laughing and saddened at the effects of the ruling -- the incredible squabbling over the money -- the idea that school spending just increased by $500-$800 million, but nothing will get better, and, in fact, it is very highly likely that this will be used as an excuse to raise my taxes even higher because they won't have enough money to pay for all the OTHER CRAP government is spending money on.
Posted by: Ogre at July 12, 2005 07:55 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2005
Carnival, carnival!
A pile of carnival links for this week. If you're floundering around with nothing to do this evening, feel free to take a perusal of a pile of links to other people's opinions and just neat areas to play.
A relatively new carnival, the
Carnival of Liberty, is up this week with just their second edition. If you like freedom and liberty, you can read lots about it (or the lack of it) there.
Tarheel Tavern #20 is up at
Scrutiny Hooligans. He makes it an all-pirate theme, and does an absolutely excellent literary job here. An absolute must read!
For a
litter little on the lighter side, take a peek at
Carnival of Cats #68. Man, that's a lot of...cats.
More animals for fun viewing at the weekly
Friday's Ark of Animals -- not just cats, either.
Another week of the
Christian Views Symposium. Come on folks, join up and add your opinion to the pile. You don't have to be a professing Christian or anything like that. Feel free to disagree or just add your own
silly opinion.
Another week of the
Homespun Blogger Symposium, this week up to number XXVII.
More lighter fare can be found at the
Carnival of Kids over at Iowa Geek.
Finally, the
New Blog Showcase appears over at Bad Example -- read the newest entries into the Blogosphere!
Posted by: Ogre at
09:38 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
We Are Not Afraid
Found over at Combs Spouts Off (he found it at Dean Esmay), a link to We're Not Afraid. From the site:
Werenotafraid.com exists to give people a voice online to tell the world that they are not afraid, intimidated or cowed by the cowardly act of terrorism. Terrorism will not be effective against the British people, and it won't be effective anywhere else.
Lots of pictures, lots of messages. Prepare to spend some time reading and viewing.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
That was lovely. I looked at the next few pages to see if there were entries from any French people, but there were none. Oddly..
Posted by: Sally at July 12, 2005 12:41 PM (crWt/)
2
None? Not even one? You sure there's wasn't one from France? I thought I saw someone holding up a white flag...

Posted by: Ogre at July 12, 2005 12:57 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Senate Confirmation Battle
From The Relentless Pursuit of Wisdom and Liberty, I present the words of the leader of the Democrats in 1993, while performing his duties as a Senator:
Then-chairman Sen. Joseph Biden told Ginsburg, "You not only have a right to choose what you will answer and not answer, but in my view you should not answer a question of what your view will be on an issue that clearly is going to come before the court in 50 forms probably, over your tenure on the court."
Someone needs to get these words out there, on a HUGE poster, to be placed in the Senate "hearing" room. Then make 10 copies, all poster-sized, ten for each Democrat Senator (with or without a D after their name), and mail them to the Senators.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:02 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
oh, come on. You know the rules differ depending on who's got home court advantage (pun intended)
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at July 11, 2005 01:20 PM (vR7Sl)
2
Sure, I know that -- I just want to be sure to point it out as often as I can!
Posted by: Ogre at July 11, 2005 01:51 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
$300 Felony
It used to be that a felony was a serious crime. Then again, it used to be that there were only laws against actual crimes. Of course, today that is not the case. Laws are now used as hammers to socially adjust you if you are different. There are so many laws that it is quite literally impossible to obey all of them, and just as impossible to enforce all of them -- so the law-enforcer is empowered to select which laws they want to enforce.
Felony:
1. One of several grave crimes, such as murder, rape, or burglary, punishable by a more stringent sentence than that given for a misdemeanor.
2. Any of several crimes in early English law that were punishable by forfeiture of land or goods and by possible loss of life or a bodily part.
I think the dictionary needs updating. Now, in North Carolina, thanks to Democrats, if someone steals $300 from a construction site,
that's a felony.
That's right -- theft of a single power tool from a construction site can now be punished on the same level as rape and murder. Steal a nail gun, go to prison with a child molester. I wonder what's next -- execution for public urination? I think it's time to throw out all North Carolina's General Statues and start all over again.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:34 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
well, we can't have people stealing tools from all those "undocumented aliens" now without some sort of serious penalty now, can we?
Can you see the State trotting up an illegal to the witness stand? Ufortunately, I can see it happening.
Posted by: William Teach at July 11, 2005 08:09 AM (kP/zI)
2
Even worse -- can you imagine if some of the illegals were the ones doing the stealing? Can't prosecute them for crimes, you see, we can't risk offending them...
Posted by: Ogre at July 11, 2005 08:58 AM (/k+l4)
3
Execution for public urination! LOL! It is great how you can write on such serious issues and still keep a sense of humor about it. I completely agree with you on this. Too many laws, and what they are being used for. This particular one is just bizarre. I think you should run for office.
Posted by: Jay at July 11, 2005 10:30 AM (2FcUc)
4
I consider running for office every year, and I've run before, but only against staggering odds. I honestly believe I could win, but I don't know what good I would do -- I'd be one conservative voice in a sea of 100 huge-government liberal democrats. I don't know that I'd get anything else done more than what I'm doing now -- pointing out how horrible and corrupt government has become.
Posted by: Ogre at July 11, 2005 10:33 AM (/k+l4)
5
Just keep trying. NC needs you. By the way, that troll over at my place is talking to you.
Posted by: Jay at July 11, 2005 11:10 AM (2FcUc)
6
I'll have to do it when I'm in a particularly good mood -- so I can complain and point out all the problems, laughing and making fun of the other elected "officials," knowing that any possible law or provision I proposed would have absolutely 0 chance of ever seeing the light of day... maybe, for fun, I could introduce dozens of laws every day by myself, just to try and clog the system...
Posted by: Ogre at July 11, 2005 11:21 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 158 >>
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0751 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.0597 seconds, 106 records returned.
Page size 74 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.