Ogre's Politics & Views
October 27, 2005
Ogre's Right!
Wow. Did I call this one right on, or what? Back on 10/19 I posted here and here:
Instead, I think Miers will come up with a “personal issue,” or give some other reason to withdraw her own nomination.
From
Mier's letter:
I am concerned that the confirmation process presents a burden for the White House and our staff and is not in the best interest of the country...[because]... I would be expected to testify about my service in the White House.
I called the Sox in 5, but
got that wrong, so it's nice to be right on the big ones.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:24 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
OOO, better run out and get my hair done in case the big Prez. calls! *taps fingers waiting for phone to ring*
Posted by: oddybobo at October 27, 2005 10:28 AM (6Gm0j)
2
I've got a call in to him now, suggesting you once again!
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 10:31 AM (/k+l4)
3
See, now, I was just going to write this morning that my participation in the Coalition of the Chilling was over, that it was time for Miers to go.
I suggest Priscilla Owens. I want to see the dems return to full Moonbat insanity.
I caught Richard 'I hate the Troops" Durbin on Fox this am, yapping on about "Bush needs to pick a centrist or moderate" appointee. Oh, like when Slick picked Ginsburg?
Posted by: William Teach at October 27, 2005 11:06 AM (cuTsc)
4
I'd love to see Owens get the nod. I don't know that Bush or the Senate really want that fight, though. Hopefully the reaction from the right will show Bush that everyone wants him to fight!
I think Bush could pick Bill Clinton and the left would still complain!
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 11:14 AM (/k+l4)
5
JAnice Brown.
The right choice all along.
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 27, 2005 12:07 PM (uXQ+I)
6
I'll take Janice as well! If he won't pick Oddy...
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 12:14 PM (/k+l4)
7
Ultimate pick: Robert Bork. Complete lib meltdown!!!
Or how about Ann Coulter?
Posted by: William Teach at October 27, 2005 05:12 PM (TFSHk)
8
Bork! Bork! Bork! Bork!
Wouldn't that be a riot to watch!
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 05:45 PM (/k+l4)
9
Bork! Bork! Bork! Bork!
Wouldn't that be awesome to watch?
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 05:55 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sex Offender Map
Want to see if sex offenders live near you (and your kids)? Check out this map. Sorry, North Carolina readers, North Carolina is not yet mapped (but 37 states are and NC is on the list to be added soon).
(Hat Tip to
And Rightly So).
Posted by: Ogre at
10:06 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Dear Ogre,
Thanks much for posting this map. This is a very important map for the family neighborhoods of the US. You have done us a great service by providing the URL.
Blessings, Bruce
Posted by: Bruce Harpel at October 28, 2005 02:09 AM (RJ2It)
2
I'm glad you found it useful, Bruce. It's a scary thing, but something that people really should know. And I just pointed it out -- Orbizon Inc. is the ones who made the map.
Posted by: Ogre at October 28, 2005 07:33 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Easley Pays Cash for Votes
Gubn'r Easley, of North Carolina, announced that "he" will give all North Carolina teachers $750. His gift will cost taxpayers $450 million. And since the North Carolina legislature is the one who determines spending, it's not quite clear HOW he can give them that money.
He gives them this money in an attempt to buy their votes. Statements by Easley's office make it unclear whether he is trying to buy the votes of teachers for himself, with aspirations towards a higher political office (US Senator?); for gubernatorial candidate Roy Cooper (200

, current state DA and candidate; or for Democrats in general.
What was clear is that this cash bribery attempt has nothing to do with teaching, education, or child learning. Easley says he wants to raise ALL teachers' salaries, currently at an average of over $60,000 per year, even if the individual teachers do nothing at work -- the important thing is to give them more money so they will continue to vote Democrat.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:09 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hey, is he going to pay my wife another $750 a year too? She teaches at what we like to call a "high quality school." That means it concentrates on excellence, starts Latin in 3rd grade, and isn't run by the government.
Where's MY teat?
Posted by: Lockjaw the Ogre at October 27, 2005 10:40 AM (mAhn3)
2
Sorry, pseudo-unions and monopoly members only receive this money. If you are actual paid based on your production and output, you get no raise. This free money is ONLY to buy votes, NOT to reward productivity.
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 10:46 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Crime Solution
It seems the bureaucrats in North Carolina have a solution to the growing crime problems in North Carolina: let more prisoners free.
What's that? There's no crime in North Carolina? Well, I'm sure if you listen to the city of Charlotte or any other currently elected politician, city boosters, or chamber of commerce, that's what you'll hear. However:
Violent Crime Rate, National, 2004: 465.5, down 2.2%
Murder Rate, National, 2004: 5.5, down 3.5%
Forcible Rape Rate, National, 2004: 32.2, down 0.2%
Robbery Rate, National, 2004: 136.7, down 4.1%
Aggravated Assault Rate, National, 2004: 291.1, down 1.5%
Property Crime Rate, National, 2004: 3517.1, down 2.1%
Violent Crime Rate, NC, 2004: 447.8, down 1.4%
Murder Rate, NC, 2004: 6.2, UP 3.7%
Forcible Rape Rate, NC, 2004: 27.4, UP 7.8%
Robbery Rate, NC, 2004: 137.9, down 5.0%
Aggravated Assault Rate, NC, 2004: 276.2, down 0.5%
Property Crime Rate, NC, 2004: 4160.2, down 2.6%
Take your time and analyze those numbers (from the FBI statistics).
Note the actual rate numbers. In four of those categories, North Carolina is doing worse than the national average -- in two, North Carolina is actually INCREASING in the crime rate while the national average is down!
In addition, in 3 out of 6 of the categories, North Carolina actually has a rate higher than the national average. So in order to keep this trend going, the Department of Parole is going to let MORE violent repeat offender criminals out on the street.
Why can't government do one of the very FEW things it is actually supposed to do? They're SUPPOSED to protect us from criminals, but they're too busy wasting our money, raising taxes, and starting a gambling business. Thank you, North Carolina Democrats.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Norman at November 21, 2005 08:30 AM (WoiRV)
2
Thanks for stopping by, Norman! These are facts, so they cannot lie.
Posted by: Ogre at November 21, 2005 08:58 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2005
Human Remote Control
Oh, I need one of these. Actually, I just want the controller -- I can think of a lot of people that could be aided by wearing the headset while I had the controller...
Posted by: Ogre at
04:06 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Weren't you working on a plan to reenlist? What's up with that?
Posted by: Jape at October 26, 2005 05:26 PM (jeXxM)
2
I was told to wait -- they'll call me... ???
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 05:59 PM (iJFc9)
3
No thank you. Not interested. I can barely control myself from walking into walls, I don't need anyone else to assist me.
Posted by: vw bug at October 26, 2005 08:33 PM (YDxO1)
4
Ah yes, if they would only do as I command, all would be well!
Just wanted you to know, I come here often and I really enjoy reading what you write and I love the format. Good job!
Posted by: Patty-Jo at October 27, 2005 03:50 AM (tIPJZ)
5
See, VW, this would be perfect for you! We (that's the Royal "we" with the controllers) would make sure you didn't walk into walls! Really we would, trust Us!
And thanks, Patty-Jo! But beware -- the format may change any time...I've been working on a new layout now for months and months, and I've finally found some time to work on the final adjustments...
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 05:41 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Federal Budget Solved!
All the wrangling and fighting in the US Congress can now end! The budget problems are over! You see, the state of Louisiana, the one who wanted tens of billions of dollars in federal money, apparently just doesn't need the money any more, so Congress can just stop sending truckloads of cash to them!
Louisiana Libertarian outlines all the things that the state is
currently spending money on, removing all thoughts that the state actually needs federal help.
For example, the state is spending $200,000 on a "recreation area at the Pearl River Canal;" another $50,000 on another recreation area in Kentwood, LA; $190,000 building a basketball gym in New Orleans; $200,000 on a "multi-cultural center" in Tensas; $400,000 on a Film Theater in Caddo; and tons more!
Head on over and read about all the things that LA is wasting money upon -- there's clearly NO need for any federal aid, so the feds should immediately stop all funding and reject the Governor's declaration of LA as a disaster area.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:05 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Halloween
Time for the weekly Christian Views Symposium, brought to you by Cross Blogging.
Each week Lennie asks an interesting question. Everyone is invited to provide an answer to the question, either on their own blog, or in the comments to his (or another) blog. This week, he's asking about Halloween:
Should Christians celebrate Halloween?
Posted by: Ogre at
12:09 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hey Ogre:
Almost every holiday is an issue for Christians. Easter started as a pagan holiday -- the Easter Bunny and Easter eggs are pagan symbols of fertility in the springtime.
December 25, now known as Christmas, is not the birth date of Jesus Christ. Around 400 AD, church leaders moved the date to coincide with Saturnalia celebrations. Saturnalia is of course the celebrating the beginning of longer days and shorter nights. Christmas trees, yule logs, and many others are pagan ways of celebrating.
If Christians give up Halloween, then they should stop celebrating Easter and Christmas in the pagan manner.
All the best....
Andy
Posted by: The Charlotte Capitalist at October 26, 2005 06:18 PM (0sv46)
2
Good to see ya again, Andy!
And yes, I'm aware of those celebrations -- but again, the intent is what counts, as far as I can tell.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 06:25 PM (iJFc9)
3
Hi Ogre - we're actually some of those "oddballs" who have taken the previous comment to heart. We haven't celebrated any holidays (other than Thanksgiving) in years. We actually spend most of our holidays much as we do Thanksgiving - with family and friends - sans all the trappings of Easter and Christmas. It took a while for all our family and friends to understand, but they're cool with it now - and I can tell you this, there's a great burden that has been lifted from us as far as the exchanging of gifts. Our daughters already acquire too much "stuff" and so we consider it as a side benefit that we neither feel a compunction to go into debt to buy gifts, nor are our girls spoiled with every new gadget coming down the pike before they've had a chance to earn it or buy it themselves. Makes them a little more accountable and responsible to work toward things they *think* they really want (only to find out after the fact that it really wasn't as big a deal as it seemed).
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 27, 2005 08:29 AM (M7kiy)
4
Just to point out, I don't consider you an "oddball" at all. I have seen the popularity of the Easter Bunny decline quite a large bit during my lifetime. One church I know of celebrates the resurrection in the morning and has a fellowship in the afternoon with families -- with the kids hiding and finding Easter Eggs -- no mention of the Easter Bunny at all, just an excuse to spend time together.
Christmas, well, don't get me started on that one. Consumerism at it's best -- which is fine for consumers. And yes, when you stop with the massive gift exchange, that is quite a large burden removed, as you've mentioned!
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 10:02 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
2,000 Dead.
As could be expected, the formerly mainstream media (FMSM) is having an orgasm in celebration of the 2000th American killed in the current version of the war on terror. They are just gushing with joy that they get to write the stories about people dying for freedom.
Of course, they've not got one word to print about the 40 million babies killed from abortion. Nothing about the thousands dead on September 11 in America. No comment on the 16,000 people murdered in the United States in 2004 (the last year numbers are available from the FBI).
They have nothing to print about the 94,000 people raped in 2004, nor the 850,000 people assaulted. No word on the victims of terrorists across the world, daily, including the terrorists in
Beirut,
darfur, or
Oklahoma.
And Cindy LOOK-AT-ME Sheehan is now
promising to tie herself to the White House fence. I'd love to see her completely ignored -- can you imagine if she tied herself to a fence and they built a construction wall around her?
It's all part of an agenda. An anti-American, anti-freedom agenda.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:03 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Obgre! You are SO on to something!
Mrs. Sheehan needs a CANVAS PRIVACY SCREEN! To PROTECT her from the elements, and apple cores and rocks hurled by patriotic passers-by!
We can dimly hear the muffled voice from inside the canvas protection singing in a high, thin wail, 'The answer, my friend, is Kum-Bay-Yah, my friend....'
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 26, 2005 11:27 AM (uXQ+I)
2
I want the 10-foot tall, green solid wood barrier. Like you say, it's for her protection...
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 11:30 AM (/k+l4)
3
You got another one right; but, I've gotten used to it so I quit keeping score. On that wall idea; maybe do the old Edgar Allen Poe type thing with the last brick sealing her in, the press would go bonkers.
Posted by: TF Stern at October 27, 2005 12:47 AM (dz3wA)
4
And to make it even funnier, build the brick wall just on 3 sides, leaving the back, where she's tied to the fence, wide open...
Posted by: Ogre at October 27, 2005 05:42 AM (iJFc9)
5
Sheehan?
Ewww...
Can I tie Halle Berry to a fence, instead?
Posted by: Harvey at October 27, 2005 07:24 PM (ubhj8)
6
Wow. Then the rest of us would sure need the added wall...
Posted by: Ogre at October 28, 2005 07:27 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Whites Only
Have you seen the barbershop sign for "Whites Only?"

It's out in front of Herbert Leger's barbershop in Lafayette, LA. And someone saw it and was "appalled."
When asked about it, Herbert explained the obvious -- "I don't have the training, I don't have the experience, I don't have the knowledge and the technique used in cutting black people's hair."
In fact, "when a customer walks in he can't help, he sends him to his barber friend across the street." I wonder how long before the NAACP demands that Herbert cut black people's hair (badly).
When the NAACP finally realizes (6 months and 2 "rallys" later) that Herb doesn't know HOW to cut black people's hair, I'm sure the ACLU will get involved to ensure taxpayers pay to teach Herb how to cut black hair.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:04 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I think he cut Don Kings hair and decided to give it up.
Posted by: Tomslick at October 26, 2005 08:39 AM (xNjHI)
2
Okay, this is is funny and pathetic at the same time.
Posted by: Contagion at October 26, 2005 08:40 AM (Q5WxB)
3
I somehow knew that Don King was going to get into this discussion...
And Contagion, did you like the backwards "s" on the sign?
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 08:58 AM (/k+l4)
4
He doesn't want his customers to leave looking worse than when they came in, and that's bad how?
If he were doing it for racist reasons, as is implied, he wouldn't be referring them to a friend.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 26, 2005 12:35 PM (K+h36)
5
It's competely honest, but there's some people who are just "horrified" by the sign itself.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 01:07 PM (/k+l4)
6
Perhaps a simple Please would make things better?
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at October 26, 2005 01:22 PM (/k+l4)
7
Looking at the condition of that sign, I'm not sure that he's got enough more letters to spell "Please..."
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 01:59 PM (/k+l4)
8
Back in my hippy days, I was refused service by a barber because he said he "didn't know how to cut long hair".
Fair enough.
Posted by: Harvey at October 27, 2005 07:26 PM (ubhj8)
9
Did you scream "racist" and sue them? I'm sure the ACLU would have helped you.
Posted by: Ogre at October 28, 2005 07:28 AM (/k+l4)
10
lol this crap funny...... persona estupido en aqui im a black brown skin guy i would walk in there and get my hair cut lol all black people dont have nappy hair ight peace lol
Posted by: javier at November 21, 2005 09:31 PM (VvILQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NewSpeak: Savings
According to the all-knowing government spokesman Earl Taylor of Onslow County Schools:
Paying an employee $14,733.16 per month instead of $8,394.00 per month is a "savings to the local, state and or federal governments."
From the
news story:
Taylor did not elaborate on how much it saves. And despite multiple requests, Taylor did not provide any numeric breakdown to illustrate precisely how it saves the taxpayers' money.
They are government. They are smart. Do not speak against them because you are dumb.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:04 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Did they take away benefits? Because if they took away benefits and are paying the guy more, they may actually be saving money.
Posted by: Contagion at October 26, 2005 08:42 AM (Q5WxB)
2
nevermind, next time I'll read the article before posting a question... this is just stupid.
Posted by: Contagion at October 26, 2005 08:45 AM (Q5WxB)
3
Indeed. They took some away but gave him even more!
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 08:59 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2005
Free Ice. Free Water.
Here we go again. "The government" is providing "free" ice, water and "other essentials" in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. So, Bou AND VW, feel free to head on over and collect some "free" stuff.
Of course, it's not really free, *I* am paying for it.
But still the government will provide. Is there anything that government won't provide? I mean to those who didn't earn it, of course. They won't give me jack because I work.
Folks, GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE ANSWER -- and I don't care what the question was. I really believe the government in the US is past the point of no return -- there will never again be a limited constitutional republic in the world. And that's really sad.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:44 PM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Yep, they are providing "free ice" just one i-95 stop away from me... it would take me about 20 minutes to get there. I am NOT going to go get it. I don't need it and it drives me nuts when people go get it 'just because it's free'. Sigh.
Posted by: vw bug at October 25, 2005 04:10 PM (YDxO1)
2
Psst. Next time make it "VW and Bou". GRIN
Posted by: vw bug at October 25, 2005 04:11 PM (YDxO1)
3
VW and Bou? Oh NOW we see how it is!
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 05:08 PM (iJFc9)
4
"They won't give me jack because I work."
Sadly, even employment doesn't always guarantee a family can make ends meet. Last year I had a student who was working full time as a machinist, had two young children, and was taking classes at my community college. She of course had to feed and clothe not only herself, but the two kids. She didn't make enough on her 40-hrs/week to pay rent, food, clothing, and for her college classes.
She could have given up the college classes, that would've given her a little more money and time to work, but then she would never be able to move up from her minimum wage job. The sad choice she eventually had to make was to live with an abusive boyfriend and his father so she didn't have to pay the rent.
The only other option I could think of would be if she packed up herself and her children and moved to a part of the country where the cost of living was lower, but this would've required moving away from everyone and everything she knew, and in a new location she'd have to pay for childcare since she wouldn't know anyone reliable to take care of her kids while she was at work or school.
I am thankful that I have never had to live a life like this, and I do not begrudge them the help they receive from my taxes. However, if you don't like how the US is doing things you have a few choices: keep complaining pointlessly; stop complaining and suck it up; vote, write letters to politicians, stage protests, make campaign contributions, and do other such things that can help your viewpoint be heard; run for office yourself; or leave the country for one that does do things the way you like.
Posted by: zandperl at October 26, 2005 12:02 AM (KHEUn)
5
zandperl,
But we are all entitled to have someone else work hard for our stuff, aren't we? This seems to be the mindset of most people today.
There is no way it will ever change, because right now.....50% of the population pay little or no taxes into the coffers, and in many cases, fill out tax forms to get money sent to them that they never paid in taxes. And I have heard one such idio bragging how much she got back in taxes, No Dorothy you didn't get back, you got some of my money given to you...via...the crooks in Washington D.C.
Have you ever heard the mantra.....the Republicans want to steal from the poor and give to the rich.
Hog wash....50% don't pay diddly...and speaking of pork....I started a new blog that will deal mostly with a government out of control.
I am sick to think our wonderful country has lost its marbles.
Posted by: web_loafer at October 26, 2005 02:19 AM (cfiWs)
6
And Zandpearl --
This country would work a lot better if it was allowed to function as originally planned.
The govt has one job, the private sector has another.
There are a lot of charities and support groups out there that are supported by private individuals, I run across them all the time surfing. I also know people who are really good at searching them out. There are companies requiring employees with certain skills that train unskilled people on the job, compensating them while they learn.
If the socialist{liberal} element in our society wasn't constantly at work trying to tear down a system that has made America the wealthiest, most influential and most powerful nation on earth, the marketplace, instead of having to concentrate on surviving under perpetual siege, might be able to do their job and help support their future assets while training them for better paying positions. I know a few people who have gone from semiemployable to highly paid professional via such NONgovernment-paid programs.
The MSM doesn't spend any time reporting these things because they, like the rest of the left, have this all pervasive need to make the govt pay for everything.
Funny thing, I might add that a great deal of socialist thought is generated from colleges.
You tell Ogre to go to a country where the government might do things more to his liking, well: This is a capitalist republic, not a socialist country. Most socialist countries aren't doing too well these days, are they?
So let the liberals leave and find one of those "Utopias" to live in, instead of screwing up this country.
Posted by: Seth at October 26, 2005 04:38 AM (MyOr7)
7
Absolutely, Seth. Private charities can do things a million times better than the government.
I don't object to people who need help getting help, Zandperl -- I object to them claiming they have a right to the fruits of MY labor.
And I *AM* doing all I can -- including pointing out where the government goes wrong here on this blog so hopefully at least one person will think about it and realize that the current government entitlement and answer-to-everything is wrong.
And I'm doing a number of the other things you list. I agree with Seth -- I want THIS country to be the constitutional republic that supports freedom -- anyone who doesn't like that ought to leave because there are plenty of other choices for socialism.
Unfortunately, the socialists NEED my capitalist money to support their programs, so they won't leave.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 07:00 AM (/k+l4)
8
My power has been out the last 2 days due to the heavy snowfall in the mountains of western PA.
No FEMA trucks spotted yet.
Posted by: Tomslick at October 26, 2005 08:46 AM (xNjHI)
9
I'm sure it's due to mismanagement, Tomslick. They will have you your free ice soon. I think on the website you can sign up for home delivery in case you're too lazy, I mean too needy, to go get it yourself.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 09:00 AM (/k+l4)
10
I think the majority of people here would rather sign the "Stay away Fema, we are doing just fine" site.
My family, my home, my responsibility. What a novel idea.
Posted by: Tomslick at October 26, 2005 12:09 PM (xNjHI)
11
You're a dinosaur, Tomslick, and not welcome by the politicians and elites of this country.
Me, too.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 01:03 PM (/k+l4)
12
Hay, Have you ever been in POLAND? I got 400E per month - my flant renting per month is about 200E and food 100.
Posted by: kiki at November 08, 2005 09:45 AM (OW7Cc)
13
400E Per month for what? For working, or just cash from the government?
Posted by: Ogre at November 08, 2005 09:57 AM (/k+l4)
14
Everyone gets so dependent on power.
I think that we need to find alternative power needs.
Posted by: Anna at November 15, 2005 10:02 PM (Wm4GU)
15
We've been searching for a long time, Anna, it's just that an economically viable alternative has not been found yet.
Posted by: Ogre at November 15, 2005 10:47 PM (7PCNv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carnival of Liberty & Showcase
This week's Carnival of Liberty is up. Much discussion and posting about freedom -- go read now.
And be sure to visit this week's
New Blog Showcase Carnival, too! New blogs!
Posted by: Ogre at
02:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Homespun Blogger Symposium XXXV.II
The Homespun Bloggers seem to have dropped the ball once again. I blame MajorDad1984. Then again, as I write this, MajorDad1984's blog is returning a 404 not found error...
The Homespun Bloggers is a place for non-professional bloggers to congregate, expand, and explore. It's a rather informal aggregator of bloggers. They post a "best of" section each week, they've had a number of radio shows and podcasts, and have had a symposium.
The symposium was a question that was asked by MajorDad, to be answered by any and all members of the consortium who chose to respond. This space here I had reserved for answering this week's question, but there's no question -- and hasn't been one since Oct 1.
Then again, I guess I should stop complaining about the lack of a Symposium question and help the Homespun Bloggers out by volunteering to take over the weekly symposium, shouldn't I?
Posted by: Ogre at
01:06 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
No Speech Allowed in Britain
The British government is working on a law that will pretty much outlaw speech in England. Sure, that might not be their intent, but the law they are working on will have that effect.
The law, called "The Racial and Religious Hatred Bill," will make it a crime to "insult," "ridicule," or complain about someone's beliefs. Those who violate the law will be subject to up to 7 years in jail.
If that law passes and I walk down the street telling a witch that "Jesus Saves," I could go to jail. Of course, if the witch replies back, "Burn in hell," I'm sure the witch could go to jail too. I sure hope you people have an awful lot of jail space over there because as written, this law could put just about the whole country in jail.
Of course it won't -- and that's what makes the law even worse: "the attorney-general will have the power of veto over any criminal action."
So if this law goes through, the attorney-general will literally have the complete power to imprison absolutely anyone he doesn't happen to like -- as everyone will break the law, but he gets to determine who gets punished for breaking the law.
Don't worry, Americans, we're darn close to a law like this, thanks to "people" like the ACLU.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:02 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I hadn't heard about this. I support alot of what they are doing in GB, but this isn't something that looks to good. I doubt they will follow up on too much of it though. I hope they won't.
Posted by: Raven at October 25, 2005 09:04 PM (3kz8d)
2
They go the right way for awhile, then they go the wrong way. They're too close to the EU for common sense.
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 09:19 PM (iJFc9)
3
They were also smart in that even though they joined the EU, they didn't let the pound be sucked in the Euro quagmire. If they ever decided to drop out, they wouldn't have to extricate their currency.
Personally, I think the EU is/was/always has been a bad idea for Europe, and this is alreadt being borne out by events.
This new speech legislation probably won't survive in its present form, more responsible MPs will undoubtedly rewrite most of it to include broadcasters and people who are in the business of being listened to by others, such as clergymen and civic leaders, rather than the man on the street. Of course, in these days of sheer global madness, anything is possible and I may be dead wrong. :-)
Posted by: Seth at October 26, 2005 04:12 AM (MyOr7)
4
If they change it that way, Seth, that just creates even more problems -- now you're giving freedom of speech to only a few, select, individuals (who will have to agree to a certain speech code to be allowed to speak freely).
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 07:02 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Senators Voting Against Pork
Allard (R-CO), Allen (R-VA), Bayh (D-IN), Burr (R-NC), Coburn (R-OK), Conrad (D-ND), DeMint (R-SC), DeWine (R-OH), Feingold (D-WI), Graham (R-SC), Kyl (R-AZ), Landrieu (D-LA), Sessions (R-AL), Sununu (R-NH), Vitter (R-LA).
That's it. Those 15 out of 100 Senators actually voted against excessive pork spending. Every other one supported pork spending and special projects. Read
this interview with the Senator who DARED to suggest the Senate reduce spending.
He is targeted, as are the other 14 on this list:
And so, Mr. President, when members come down to the floor and vote on this amendment, they need to know if they start stripping out this project, Senator Bond and I are likely to be taking a long, serious look at their projects, to determine whether they should be preserved during our upcoming conference negotiations.
In other words, the Senators who voted for this reduction in pork spending are now targeted by Senator Patty Murray. I think the US Senate is beyond hope of recovery unless Senator Tom Coburn from Oklahoma gets a lot more support.
The Wideawakes have more details.
Posted by: Ogre at
07:02 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Neither of my states Senators voted correctly.
I also want to say this, the two votes from the Louisiana Senators areL disingenuous (they both want all of the states to switch pork to there states, not get rid of pork)so that leaves a dozen Senators that love this country. The rest can go to hell for all I care, including both Kansas Republican Senators. What a bunch of pompous thiefs.
Thanks for carrying the torch for fiscal sanity.I recently started a blog for the purpose of exposing all politicians.....
Dah, can't remember my url for the new blog, there is a link from Sanity's Bluff....it is Patriotic/Idiotic something like that.
This pork will not stand.
Posted by: web_loafer at October 25, 2005 11:07 AM (cfiWs)
2
And this is one of those votes where I don't think intentions matter. It was simple and straightforward, and the individuals chose on which side they were going to stand. I'm very happy to be able to say one of my Senators from North Carolina (Richard Burr) actually voted the right way! I think I'm going to send him a cake or something.
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 11:28 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lawsuit against Bribery
The lawsuit continues against the state of North Carolina for giving away over $260 million in taxpayer funds to bribe the private company, Dell Inc., to move to North Carolina.
In 1995 the State Supreme Court ruled that so-called "incentives" are legal and constitutional. It is highly likely that the court will rule that way again -- after all government begets government.
What's even more troubling is a lawyer for the defense said, “It’s really a case against the people’s government, and that government is clearly doing what it was elected to do."
If that's true, then the battle is truly lost. If people are electing government to take care of them and redistribute wealth, then we honestly are beyond that point of no return -- there can never be freedom if that is the purpose of government. Those that produce are now outnumbered by those that do not produce -- and nothing short of a serious revolution will change that.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I have always said that the only way to change the American government is to get rid of all the current officals and start over. This just proves it.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at October 25, 2005 07:07 AM (/k+l4)
2
Certainly in North Carolina -- and yes, Nationwide. A group of people in PA are giving that a shot this year -- http://www.pacleansweep.com/
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 07:12 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2005
Carnival, carnival!
A couple of carnivals for your reading pleasure on this Monday evening:
First up, the
Tarheel Tavern. This is a carnival of North Carolina bloggers blogging in and about the turpentine state (North Carolina). This week the tavern appears at
Slowly she Turned.
Next is the
Carnival of True Liberties, spotlighting the loss of liberties and enemies of liberty in America. Check it out.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:04 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Monday afternoon laughs
Need some laughter for your Monday afternoon? This video is 3.5 minutes long, and you're certain to be smiling before it's over. I wonder if the guy in the background has a clue...
Ah, to be in college again.
(Hit Tip to
Kit).
Posted by: Ogre at
01:06 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
"Hit Tip?" What in the WORLD is a Hit Tip?
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 02:25 PM (/k+l4)
2
OT, you get pie if I get an address! I found a shipping place that specializes in shipping fragile pies.
Posted by: oddybobo at October 24, 2005 03:32 PM (6Gm0j)
3
OT, you get pie if I get an address! I found a shipping place that specializes in shipping fragile pies and other goodies.
Posted by: oddybobo at October 24, 2005 03:32 PM (6Gm0j)
4
Hmm, that was weird. Guess I hit "enter mid-sentence and it posted twice. . .
Posted by: oddybobo at October 24, 2005 03:35 PM (6Gm0j)
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 03:40 PM (/k+l4)
6
What cracked me up was the kid on the other side of the room, AVOIDING the video hell his roommates were trying to drag him into!
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 25, 2005 10:14 AM (uXQ+I)
7
I was trying to figure out if he even had a clue -- it looked like he was playing a video game and trying to ignore them.
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 10:35 AM (/k+l4)
8
I'm trying to figure out WHICH video game.
Could be Doom.
Could be Grand Theft Auto.
REALLY hard to tell.
Posted by: Harvey at October 25, 2005 04:49 PM (ubhj8)
9
At first I thought he was doing the editing, but after watching real close, you can tell he's not. It looks a lot like Doom, but he just doesn't move enough to be sure...
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 05:09 PM (iJFc9)
10
Heck YES!!!
Chinamen representing Houston, Texas! (Rockets Jerseys)
Freekin' Noobs tho... I could have done way at the choreography. ^o^
--Neji
Posted by: Neji at November 04, 2005 05:18 PM (IleHf)
11
Hey, give it a shot, Neji!!
Posted by: Ogre at November 04, 2005 06:06 PM (7PCNv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bou Go Splat
Yikes! Boudicca of Boudicca's Voice is really about to get hammered -- and not in a good way:

She lives right in the middle of that clear area -- right in front of that really nasty red area, and she's
already got extensive damage.
Say a prayer for her family and everyone else in that mess. And check her blog for updates, as she's phoning in the updates to her dad who's posting them on her site.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:45 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
OUCH. I am saying prayers. She has a blog, can she post to it now?? If not and you hear from her let us know how she is doing.
Posted by: Raven at October 24, 2005 05:48 PM (3kz8d)
2
Latest updates indicate some roof damage, but other than that, nothing serious.
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 09:01 PM (iJFc9)
3
BLHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. See if I post any more Miami Dolphin info for you. Bou Bou Bou... what about VW???? GRIN. We live about 20 minutes away from each other. I haven't heard from her yet. I am assuming she has no power. I have left messages with her dad and on her cell phone to bring over her laundry and take a hot shower.
Things are looking better here today. The high will only be 70, so it will be livable (vs 100 just a week ago). Will keep you updated as I can... even if you do seem to worry more about Bou... and sniff sniff... forget about me. HA hahahaha. I am really joking. (hard to make it come across in words)
Posted by: vw bug at October 25, 2005 10:57 AM (3lN9J)
4
20 minutes away and you HAVE hot water and power? THAT'S why no VW!
And 70? Geez, was darn 37 this morning. It's not supposed to be that cold in North Carolina in October!
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 11:16 AM (/k+l4)
Posted by: vw bug at October 25, 2005 02:37 PM (YDxO1)
6
But hey, you can get free ice!
Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2005 02:40 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
DUI OK -- If you don't speak English
0.22 is an acceptable BAC for driving if you cannot speak English, says defense attorneys and judges in Durham, NC. Good thing we don't prosecute illegal aliens, isn't it?
There are now
numerous cases where
pond-scum dirtbags defense lawyers are now successfully arguing that you cannot arrest someone for DUI without reading them their rights
in their native tongue. District Judge Jim Hill says "It's not a black-and-white issue."
This judge and others have thrown out convictions of drunk drivers with 0.22 BAC because they were spanish. Never mind equal protection under the law -- according to these judges, the United States of America, and North Carolina, are REQUIRED that every single police officer learn to speak every language on the planet.
How else could it be otherwise? Georgia and Ohio, who have similar DUI laws, have already ruled that it's impossible for police officers to speak every known language. Unfortunately, Durham, NC, is being effectively ordered to learn every single language.
The
waste of life crap-eating underside of snakes defense lawyers argue "Just because somebody doesn't speak English doesn't mean he can be railroaded. That would be very offensive." Oh no, we wouldn't want to offend anyone, would we? Hey morons, I'm offended that these people break the law and come to this country illegally, refuse to learn the language, and get to break even more laws and kill people without being punished.
And here I was always taught that ignorance of the law was not a defense. Now, according to some judges, it is.
Peter Porcupine notes the
same problem in MA.
_______________________
This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst, which takes place every Monday on
Euphoric Reality. The purpose is to keep immigration issues at the forefront and to apply pressure to our elected officials to get the problem fixed. If you’re concerned about the state of our borders, email kit.jarrell at gmail dot com to join.
This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst, which takes place every Monday on
Euphoric Reality. The purpose is to keep immigration issues at the forefront and to apply pressure to our elected officials to get the problem fixed. If you’re concerned about the state of our borders, email kit.jarrell at gmail dot com to join.
Blogs Already on Board:
Posted by: Ogre at
10:05 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Ogre - my current blog post is on the same general subject, about some chicanery here in Mass.
I cannot understand how pols do not get how outraged the pubic is over this.
Posted by: Peter Porcupine at October 24, 2005 02:28 PM (uXQ+I)
2
The pols just want the votes. Here in North Carolina, illegal aliens can vote, so the politicians are all fighting to see who can "capture" the illegal alien vote.
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 02:58 PM (/k+l4)
3
so.pissed.can't.think.straight.
Posted by: Contagion at October 24, 2005 05:13 PM (Q5WxB)
4
Have a beer...and then pretend you can't speak English.
Posted by: Ogre at October 24, 2005 05:25 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 135 >>
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.2586 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2484 seconds, 115 records returned.
Page size 71 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.