Confederate Yankee
August 28, 2008
Oops!... He Did It Again
Get ready for Barack Spears and the Temple of Duh:
As if a Rocky Mountain coronation were not lofty enough, Barack Obama will aim for Mount Olympus when he accepts his party's nomination atop an enormous, Greek-columned stage - built by the same cheesy set team that put together Britney Spears' last tour.
[snip]
"We've done Britney's sets and a whole bunch of rock shows, but this was far more elaborate and complicated and we had to do it in far less time," said Allen, of RDA Entertainment.
"The biggest challenge has been making sure we don't damage the playing field underneath."
Asked who is harder to satisfy - the Democrats or Britney - Allen replied: "I better not answer that."
Honestly? I just hope Obama remembers his underwear.
(h/t/
Hot Air)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:25 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Yeah don't vote for Obama because he didn't know that the guy who designed his set was the same guy who did Britney Spears. Cause that's just proof of his stupidity. I mean, it's not like this isn't important or anything. What a moron Obama is.
Way to stay on top of all the important stuff. Where would we be if you weren't there to enlighten us?
Posted by: Notnowjohn at August 28, 2008 05:30 PM (yx2x9)
2
No, we won't vote for Obama because he is a complete and total liar, who threatens hard working folks with Marxist tax increases, fake populist nostrums that have not worked in the past and will not work in the future, a shady past (Rezko, Ayers, Wright et al)..lies upon lies.
We won't vote for him because his policies, if carried out by the worst Congress (Democrat controlled), will send this country to the abyss; it's been close, because of the insane policies of the liberals, of LBJ"s "war on Poverty" (note; Still a lot of poverty and Detroit, the epitome of welfare cities, looked like it has been besieged).
We won't vote for Obama because he has an agenda that will promote anti-democratic non-secret ballots for unions, who are pushing Mr. No-Special-Interest Obama..another lie. Obama will push every idiotic agenda out there...teacher's unions? Oh yeah, let's spend billions more on education, regardless of if that makes a bit of sense. Hasn't worked well so far. Let's make all the rest of the hyphenated groups victims, so we can throw monies (our monies) their way.
We won't vote for Obama since he has no real knowledge of ANYTHING (he had no clue about the Russian-Georgian conflict, he thought a bomb was dropped on Pearl Harbor...I don't believe that was a gaffe like his "57 states" slip...I really think he's just a complete ignoramus)
We won't vote for Obama because he has no real paper trail of any REAL accomplishments. Just a lot of lies about his community activities, about his Harvard Law Review experience...and then his many "present" votes in his time in legislative office.
Oh yeah, his Nuremberg rally-style stadium fete...add it to the list of important reasons we won't vote for this man who doesn't deserve to be in the Senate, much less be the President of this country.
Posted by: Maurice at August 28, 2008 11:39 PM (A1bX5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Democrats Against Obama... Starring Barack Obama
As the overwhelming majority of Americans who aren't political junkies begin to get to know Barack Obama, it becomes increasingly obvious why first-term Senators with exceedingly thin resumes rarely ever run for President.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:13 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Buried himself with his own words.
Please let this make it to tv, though I hear Mac is going to be on the tube tonight, addressing himself directly to Obama. I hope he takes it to that joke of a DFL candidate.
Posted by: Pardo at August 28, 2008 12:54 PM (9v34C)
2
I hope the campaign is savvy enough to play this over and over in every state. This is quite devestating to Obama.
Posted by: t.ferg at August 28, 2008 01:08 PM (2YVh7)
Posted by: iconoclast at August 28, 2008 01:54 PM (ex0JG)
4
Fine. exceedingly thin.
Hey, I haven't slept since Valentine's Day. Cut me a little slack.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at August 28, 2008 02:00 PM (xNV2a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Do Not Blaspheme, Non-Believers
Instead of making a good-faith effort to explain his 21-year working and personal relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, Barack Obama has chosen another route in an attempt quell the building controversy; he's having his campaign incite his followers to shout down his critics.
Obama's campaign has previously threatened broadcasters who would carry an ad linking Obama to Ayers, and has also asked the Department of Justice to shut down the group that made the ad.
The intense campaign to silence dissenting voice has also included a
recent campaign email asking Obama supporters to deluge Chicago-based broadcaster WGN with complaints to
pressure the radio station to cancel an appearance by Stanley Kurtz, a writer with National Review who is researching the documents of the Chicago Annenburg Challenge.
The Challenge, co-founded by Ayers and chaired by Obama, took tens of millions dollars in grant funds and public and private matching funds with the stated goal of increasing the quality of education in Chicago. The program was utterly ineffective, and some critics are suggesting that the challenge was little more than a slush fund for left-wing radicals. At least $175,000 was funneled to Ayers' friend, SDS radical, Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) (CPML) chairman and Barack Obama supporter Mike Klonsky's Small School Workshop.
I wrote
earlier this week:
Barack Obama wants to convince us that it shouldn't matter that Bill Ayers, Ayer's dead terrorist bomber girlfriend, his terrorist wife and their cronies declared war on the United States and murdered its citizens. The murders, the treason, the bombings of American targets in a war they declared... all distractions.
I was dead wrong. The Barack Obama campaign doesn't want to
convince us of anything. It simple wants to threaten and bully critics into silence.
Freedom of speech is nice,
if you can keep it. As a blogger, I wonder how much we'll have left if ever faced with a Justice Department run by the Silencer in Chief.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:22 AM
| Comments (37)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hussein O is a member or the Chicago mob so why would he not use mob tactics to win 'another' election. It got him where he is, that and being a black tool of his white lords in Chicago.
Posted by: Scrapiron at August 28, 2008 09:45 AM (I4yBD)
2
Among other approaches, Obama's apologists want to try to convince inquiring minds that the span of time since Ayers committed his atrocities should lessen the stigma of Obama associating with Ayers during the most recent ten years or so.
The best response is to ask the apologists if this means that Obama would be comfortable buddying up to Charlie Manson - whose infamous activities occurred during roughly the time period as Ayers' misdeeds. Ayers, Manson, and Obama - that should make a memorable image.
What I keep wondering is: How can Obama possibly qualify for a Top Secret security clearance - given his shady and criminal associates, his extensive family ties overseas, and his inability to produce key personal history documents. There should be no way he could get a top-level clearance - and that alone should disqualify him from being eligible to serve as Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces.
Posted by: Lone Ranger at August 28, 2008 10:28 AM (EQDRI)
3
Gee, I thought dissent was the highest form of patriotism.
Since Obama and Co. lie so much, and spread so many distortions about McCain, Bush, and Republicans..... would it be fair to send letters to radio stations and tv stations to have them ban Obama and Co. from the airwaves? Should we send tons of letters to DoJ to investigate and prosecute the rich enablers of Obama and Co.?
Remember too that leading Democrats in Congress sent a letter to Clear Channel to try to dump Rush.
The left claims that the Patriot Act is chilling free speech. There are no documented caes I can recall. However, we have two examples of Democrats using, or threatening to use, the force of government to shut down free speech.
Which really is more chilling?
Posted by: SouthernRoots at August 28, 2008 10:30 AM (EsOdX)
4
Barry may have gotten the notion that such tactics can prevail honestly, through experience in Chicago. Bill stated it well; Barry has the instincts of a Chicago thug. They seem not to understand that such efforts then become stories themselves. It truly is amateur night for the Dems. The major problem for them though is that even if you discount Ayers bombing history the very facts of Annenberg and Ayers other forays into "education reform" are just as damning. Ayers truly and explicitly strives to make ALL education in this country an exercise in socialist totalitarian indoctrination. Not even your pony-tailed granola munchers want that. Ayers continues his politics by other means; that is to say, warfare. This is all well documented in his own public statements. Terry McCauliffe demonstrated that he was utterly unfamiliar with the content or tenor of these statements the other day on Hannity. They have plugged their ears to this. Let's unplug 'em.
Posted by: megapotamus at August 28, 2008 10:50 AM (LF+qW)
5
Among other approaches, Obama's apologists want to try to convince inquiring minds that the span of time since Ayers committed his atrocities should lessen the stigma of Obama associating with Ayers during the most recent ten years or so.Back when everyone thought Arnold was a Republican, how many times did we hear about Gustav Schwarzenegger's Nazi Party membership, which happened long before the Weathermen's activities?
Posted by: The Monster at August 28, 2008 10:53 AM (up2jZ)
6
When you can't rebut the facts, silence the source. Reminiscent of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Khrushchev, Putin, Chavez, Hussein, Khomeini. obama fits in well doesn't he? Just the kind of "leader" the left wants to see in the Oval Office.
Will we soon be hearing? "Freedom of speech is what we tell you it is."
Posted by: TheEnigma47 at August 28, 2008 11:01 AM (3YWxV)
7
what a post title, thought it might be about the muzzies in the UN
“Defaming Islam” could soon be violation of international law
Posted by: Momo at August 28, 2008 11:02 AM (VYzof)
8
One thought does strike me: what if there is more to the story than just a close relationship between Ayers and Obama? What if the real story is the activities (and final audit) at the Annenberg Education Challenge fund and not the questionable recipients? Could that be the Obama campaigns real fear? The nearly unhinged reaction of the Obama campaign to Kurtz and the ad backers certainly can be interpreted as a deeper fear than justified for just yet another inappropriate friendship (or maybe they are just juvenile amateurs in campaigning--which does fit the Razor criteria).
After all, questionable recipients combined with questionable associates under the umbrella of questionable philosophy in the milieu of Chicago politics might have some interesting stories.
I look forward to reading what Kurtz discovers. I doubt that the records can be sufficiently purges to hide the holes where the purging was done. Someone like Kurtz may well be able to fill in those holes--if they exist.
Posted by: iconoclast at August 28, 2008 12:02 PM (ex0JG)
9
There seems to be a lack of understanding on how things work here in the U.S., so I volunteer as a tutor:
When a democrat/liberal speaks it's free speech.
When a Republican/conservative speaks it's hate speech.
Here endeth the lesson.
Posted by: Pardo at August 28, 2008 12:57 PM (9v34C)
10
As far as I know, and I am not a lawyer, there is no statute of limitations on murder.
Posted by: 1sttofight at August 28, 2008 01:01 PM (u7rGG)
11
1sttofight, Ayers slaughtered many innocent people, he even admits it. Problem is his case was thrown out because the wire taps proving his guilt were "found" to be illegal. There is very little if any difference between Ayers and Charles Manson, except I believe Ayers (and his cronies) murdered more people than did Manson and his cronies.
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 28, 2008 01:33 PM (kNqJV)
12
This is just another silly distraction from the serious issues which need to be discussed during this campaign.
Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
Obama has only proved willing to give up the truth(?) about his shady associations when he is backed into a corner. With Wright, Rezko, Pfleger and now Ayers, it is a pattern. Just connect the dots.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 28, 2008 05:15 PM (i/fLn)
13
I can vouch for the Terry McCauliffe thing on Hannity. Hannity was like, "But Ayers is un-repentant", and Terry McCauliffe was like, "Why? What did he say?", and when Hannity read him Ayers' quotes... there was dead silence for about 5 seconds as Terry McCauliffe tried to digest what he had just heard.
Posted by: Gary at August 28, 2008 05:25 PM (ZZOa6)
14
how many times did we hear about Gustav Schwarzenegger's Nazi Party membership
You can't choose your relatives. You can however choose your friends and people you associate with.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 28, 2008 07:42 PM (6L459)
15
I think iconoclast is on to something. However, remember the delay between the time they refused Kurtz access (with Da Mayor's backing) and the time they backed down. This is Chicago. I'm sure some very pertinent documents were fed into the shredder.
Obama really wants the U.S. to be another Canada. Well, if he's elected, we'll become just that - a socialist country with a severely pared down military and - just you wait - our very own Human Rights Commission!
Please Lord, let this guy lose.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 28, 2008 11:13 PM (BQqDq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 27, 2008
Aww... I Upset Sully
"Even by the still-falling standards of the degenerate conservative movement, this was a disgusting post."
Degenerate, disgusting, whatever.
What he doesn't
and can't call me is wrong.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:40 AM
| Comments (68)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Heh. When someone cites you as an example of the degenerate conservative movement, and describes your post as 'disgusting'?
'Wrong' is sorta assumed. But hey, nice chesty rhetoric, complete with italics. Who knows? It might even have sounded convincing when you practiced it in the mirror this morning.
Well. Probably not.
Posted by: Miles Archer at August 27, 2008 09:52 AM (/zhOT)
2
you know you're over the target when you start taking flak.
Posted by: HKpistole at August 27, 2008 10:00 AM (/j9KS)
3
Miles,
I think not. The reason Sully did't outright call him wrong was because he couldn't. He knows CY is right, and hates that fact, so he resorts to the one pathetic avenue left to him: Insult.
No leg to stand on, resorting to poop-flinging? Kinda y'alls thing, ain't it?
Posted by: HKpistole at August 27, 2008 10:15 AM (/j9KS)
4
No one can say your statement is wrong. If I were to say that John McCain is secretly a Muslim, you can't PROVE that I'm wrong... You can say I'm over the top and that I'm so partisan that I've lost perspective and a good deal of logic... and you'd be right.
I'm not left, I'm not right... I'm center, and I lean conservative in most of my views, but seriously Sir, this kind of partisan crap is what turns people off of politics. If you want to attack Obama's policies, high taxes, economic worldview, and lack of experience... Fine... Those things are all tangible and stated.
But seriously, when you hit the point where you start speculating on the inner thoughts and motives of the other guys... you are in the wrong place. Does it get you attention? Yes. Are you part of the problem? Yes. Don't put yourself in the same category as Kos and Moore...
Posted by: Josh at August 27, 2008 10:24 AM (Mk6i+)
5
Have you noticed that Sullivan has still not corrected his post that falsely asserted that a member of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth was now attacking McCain? (The newspaper article he linked to clearly said that the individual was a Kerry supporter.) Just goes to show that you can get a degree from Oxford and still be a shameless liar.
Posted by: pst314 at August 27, 2008 11:34 AM (OA547)
6
Why would anybody pretending to intelligence read Andrew Sullivan, much less comment on what she said and try to drive traffic to her?
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at August 27, 2008 11:42 AM (OmeRL)
7
People, do not even dignify this post by commenting. Yuck!
Posted by: tim at August 27, 2008 11:48 AM (E+vDR)
8
Yeah - unlike the failing standards of the liberal movements own depraved vile delusional paranoid just plain vicious left wing whack jobs called " 9/11 Truthers" who are too ghoulish to be taken seriously by anyone-- except liberals!
Posted by: Huntress at August 27, 2008 12:03 PM (Qn9iF)
9
Can someone clear up for me what a "Malkin Award" is?
The last I seriously read Sullivan was back when he was handing out the "Derbyshire Award" in 'honor' of John Derbyshire at NR (not long after that I stopped reading Sullivan when he kept on proclaiming that there was a priest sex abuse scandal because celibacy, apparently, makes people sex-mad rapists and not because the priests involved were, based on the grossly disproportionate amount of abuse directed at adolescent males, homosexuals).
Posted by: ECM at August 27, 2008 12:26 PM (q3V+C)
10
ahhh man... what happened? Now we got trolls everywhere!!!
Posted by: Big Country at August 27, 2008 12:51 PM (niydV)
11
We all know the only thing the left has is ad hominum attacks. They can't and won't try to refute the facts because they can't. That's exactly why they love the courts so much, they know damn well they can't get their agenda approved by the voters.
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 27, 2008 01:40 PM (kNqJV)
12
I wonder how many of the moonbat commenters here have actually read Michelle Malkin's book Unhinged, which documents the tolerant, peaceful, enlightened, progressive, left's actual violence against those who have the misfortune not to share the same ideas ( I forgot, they can't read Malkin, she's a monster, they have to criticize her without reading her.). Dave Neiwert gleefully fantasizes about right wing nutjobs lurking around every corner waiting to do harm to patriotic leftists and other real Americans. Projection is something the left has been teaching in liberalism 101 and it shows in the comment section today.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 27, 2008 01:52 PM (i/fLn)
13
matta - Read Malkin's book.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 27, 2008 03:18 PM (i/fLn)
14
Sorry Andrea has her panties in a wad!
Posted by: arch at August 27, 2008 05:00 PM (fKThr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ayers: Bombing America Not A Big Deal
Someone should ask Barack Obama point blank: at what point during his 21-year relationship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers (and to a lesser-documented but no less real extent, Ayer's terrorist wife and Charles Manson fan, Bernadine Dohrn) did Ayers and Obama discuss Ayer's involvement with the Weather Underground, and what was said?
In over two decades of knowing each other and running in Chicago's political cauldron of aging New Left radicals, SDS leftovers, graying Weatherman, Marxist-Leninists, angry activist priests and fringe religions, the "glory days" of the 1960s and 70s must have come up in conversation.
Did the bombings ever come up in conversations at one another's homes? Did they ever have side conversations before or after the official business of their many working relationships in the ABCs Coalition, the Woods Fund, and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge?
Mr. Obama owes us an explanation.
For his part, a three-year-old interview in a current
Ayer's story fills in part of the puzzle:
In the interview, conducted three years after the September 11 attacks, Ayers argued the U.S. government had carried out "many other acts of terror ... even recently, that are comparable," and claimed he and his bomb-planting comrades were "restrained" in their actions.
Ayers, now a professor at the University of Illinois, Chicago, served with Barack Obama on the board of the charitable Woods Fund of Chicago for three years and helped launch Obama's political career in Illinois by hosting in his Hyde Park home an informal campaign event for the future state senator in 1995.
Ayers claimed the Weathermen were driven by "hope and love," not despair, and said he did not think the group's violent acts, targeting federal officials and local law enforcement officers, were "a big deal."
What a very interesting psychological profile Mr. Ayers must have.
Was it "hope" or "love" that led his fellow Weathermen to purchase two cases of dynamite, lengths of pipe, and roofing nails to build anti-personnel bombs?
Ayers was the boyfriend of fellow Weatherman bomb-builder Diana Oughten. Oughten was thought to be constructing massive pipe-bombs that used roofing nails for shrapnel in a Greenwich Village townhome, when they accidentally went off.
The target of those bombs wasn't to be a statute in an empty park at night.
It wasn't a federal building targeted at a time when most employees would have gone home.
The anti-personnel bombs she and other Weathermen were constructing were designed expressly to take the greatest human toll possible, and they were to be placed at a non-commissioned officer's dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey, targeting young soldiers, their wives, their girlfriends.
The multiple bombs were built to cause as much loss of life as possible, similar what Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold tried to do with their failed propane bombs at Columbine.
But the Weathermen never made it to their target of choice. The bombs they meant for innocents detonated as they were being assembled in a townhouse basement, killing terrorists Oughten, Ted Gold, and Terry Robbins.
Perhaps they would be happy to know that the bombs worked as designed, if prematurely. From the pieces of Oughten they were able to collect after the blast and other evidence, they think Oughten was standing over one of the bombs, perhaps with her hands on it, when it went off.
If the Weathermen had been successful in detonating multiple nail-filled bombs a dance filled with off-duty soldiers and their dates, would Bill Ayers still claim that the bombings of his group were " no big deal"?
Bloody taffeta and lace and the images of shocked, mutilated survivors would have changed that equation.
Just because the Weathermen were spectacularly unsuccessful in their attempts to prepare for mass murder doesn't make them any less vile.
Nor does it excuse Barack Obama from consorting with them for over 20 years.
Update: Andy McCarthy runs very much a parallel route,
Bill Ayers: Unrepentant LYING Terrorist.
Due to spammers, comments are closed.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:19 AM
| Comments (63)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
IMO, Ayers is going to become very prominent in the election soon after BHO is nominated as the Democrats' candidate. And a lot of the Americans that are undecided are going to seriously question BHO's judgment and choice of acquaintances. You can't pick your family, but you can pick your friends.
Posted by: Penfold at August 27, 2008 09:31 AM (lF2Kk)
2
Well, it took William F. Buckley 48 years to repudiate his support of segregation, Bull Connor and the mobs defending their "folkways and mores" by attacking blacks. So Ayers still has a few years to beat him to the punch.
Posted by: nitpicker at August 27, 2008 11:59 AM (8NiWI)
3
What I cannot figure out is how Obama can possibly qualify for a Top Secret security clearance.
The questionable associations, relatives, and overseas involvements must combine to make him highly ineligible to obtain a top-level security clearance.
As such, he should immediately be disqualified from serving as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.
Posted by: Lone Ranger at August 27, 2008 12:13 PM (wrZV5)
4
nitpicker:
Even if what you state wasn't a bald-faced lie (re: Buckley), but the fact that, even in light of what Ayers did, you can't just condemn the man, and his associates, speaks volumes about your (lack of) character.
You can chalk your post up to just one more in the long line of liberal "well, your guys did something bad so so can mine so who are we to judge, nyahnyahnyah" reasoning.
Posted by: ECM at August 27, 2008 12:14 PM (q3V+C)
5
He didn't think the violence was a "big deal?" Um....I bet Sergeant Brian V. McDonnell would disagree, well, he would if the "Weathermen" hadn't killed him. What a bunch of scumbags!
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 27, 2008 01:45 PM (kNqJV)
6
I've met Ayers before. He's polite, follows academic decorum, and was not carrying explosives as far as I could tell. If you met him, you would think he was just another 60s radical turned professor. I think Barry just didn't pay attention to him beyond the obvious.
Posted by: OmegaPaladin at August 27, 2008 04:11 PM (pT/QE)
7
I was in college in the 1960s and I witnessed the SDS movement which morphed into the Weathermen then the Weather underground. Bill Ayers, Diana Oughten and Bernadette Dohrn weren't sympathetic figures. They were hard, ruthless criminals who terrorized the country. When their Ft Dix bomb detonated prematurely, Diana Oughten got the Darwin award but most of the others wanted to press on. One guy emerges as a tragic figure - Mark Rudd.
Rudd was a young radical who realized they had gone too far. He teaches at a Jr College in California and realizes that the Weathermen were wrong and says so. I hate him for his terrorism but I respect him for realizing what they had done. Ayers and Dohrn are human waste.
Posted by: arch at August 27, 2008 05:14 PM (fKThr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FactCheck.Org: Obama Lied About his Born Alive Votes
Barack Obama coverup attempt fails:
At issue is Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman's legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.
We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee's 2003 mark-up session.
The choice of a
temple theme for Obama's stage now seems even more appropriate, as his nomination is indeed turning out to be a Greek tragedy.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:02 AM
| Comments (32)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
August 26, 2008
Jeep Jihadi Gets Up to 33 Years
Progressive university town that Chapel Hill is, they'll probably have some there protest the decision which resulted from Taheri-Azar's attempt to kill UNC-Chapel Hill students in The Pit with a rented SUV.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
02:52 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
not enough, IMHO. That Bastard meant to murder people - randomly chosen, innocent people minding their own business. He shoulda been given flying lessons 30,000 ft over the Atlantic!
Posted by: HKpistole at August 27, 2008 08:33 AM (/j9KS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Left's Obama Assassination Fantasy
There are a lot of people who have hopes of Barack Obama being the target of an assassination attempt during the Democratic National Convention this week in Denver, and not all of them are his enemies. The arrest of a four drug users with stolen weapons and a single outlandish assassination claim has made that all too clear.
Local news reporters see the possibility of a career-enhancing
national story. National news reporters in
mass market liberal enclaves see an opportunity to once again push a meme they've been hammering at for over a year, of a racist American heartland. This meme, of Americans as violent backwards yokels, is a meme that
smug Europeans dearly love as it helps them maintain the delusion of continental sophistication in the face of their own cultural decline.
Of course, none of this would be possible without the unhinged few in a nation of 300 million that would like to see Obama dead, including thus far a
halfwit bail-bondsman wannabe, a Charlotte, NC man suffering the
lingering effects of a brain injury, and now a quartet of meth-addled idiots with rumored ties to white supremacists and outlaw bikers.
As you may well imagine, bloggers pounced on the story
as the local news did, taking shreds of information and trying to determine just how serious of a threat Barack Obama faced.
As it turns out,
not much at all:
A half dozen federal security officials have told The Mouth that the supposed plot to assassinate Barack Obama during his Thursday acceptance speech in Denver by four armed dope suspects was considered a bunch of hooey.
Tharin Robert Gartrell, 28, and several other drug suspects linked to white supremacist groups were busted Sunday after Aurora, Colo., cops saw him driving a rented pickup erratically.
"What's in plain view? Guns and a bulletproof vest," a federal agent assigned to the Democrats' Denver nominating convention told The Mouth. "One rifle had a scope sighted in at 750 yards. But he said they werent his guns."
Cops went looking for Gartrell's pals at two hotels. At the second hotel, their knock on a door prompted a suspect to leap out his sixth-story window and break his ankle in the fall, sources said. During interrogation, one of the suspects dimed out a buddy for allegedly threatening to kill Obama, officials said.
"They all had meth with them. There is no evidence of a plot other than one guy's word, and meth heads aren't that reliable (with the truth)," the federal agent said.
Meth heads aren't exactly known for being a member of
any reality-based community, and so the story might have flown completely under the radar as so much drug-addled hot air were it not for the fact that weapons, ammunition and a spotting scope were recovered during the initial arrest.
But what of the weapons, and the plot alleged by a single suspect? Police have not released much in the way of detail about the weapons or any plot, but as no key details have been released to the contrary, it seems likely the scope rifles were likely factory deer rifles and conventional commercial scopes, details which authorities are expected to release in a press conference later today.
The claim of the rifle being sighted at 750 yards is simple hearsay repeating of the suspect's claim; one cannot determine wher a weapon is zeroed with any certainly by simply looking at the weapon's scope. If the police haven't fired it, they simply don't know if it is sighted at 750 yards, or if it has even been sighted at all. One must also take into account that the weapons were plain view with no protective case in the suspect's pickup truck when confiscated, and the jarring of a moderately-sized pothole could easily render a scope's zero worthless at all but close range.
There is little chance that those arrested posed any serious threat, or even had a plan at all.
An average shooter with a scoped rifle can hit a man-sized target at 100 yards with regularity. An average shooter who has been practicing can make the same shot at 200 yards with no discernible change in point-of-aim. A good shooter who knows his gun, ammunition, and wind conditions can make the shot at 300 yards most of the time, but much beyond that, wind drift, ballistics, shooter experience, imperfections in trigger control and limitations of the weapon and ammunition make such shots improbable even on a stationary target with plenty of time to prepare and fire.
Simply put, there is very little chance that anyone outside of a highly trained team of a well-trained precision long-distance shooter and a equally competent spotter could make such a shot as one at 750 yards, nor even any verified opportunity that Obama would present himself as a target in any venue at that sort of range.
Many leading liberal bloggers, of course, aren't waiting around to determine if there was an actual threat to Obama. A possibility of a threat, however non-viable, is all the excuse they need to
blame the racist and ideological hate that liberals just
know is at the core of every Republican's soul, and even
claim that McCain needs to denounce such morons, as if he had any role, knowledge, or ties to a group of no-account meth users.
I could of course point out that these same liberal bloggers and their ideological kin have been silent in recent years as Andrew Mickel, a radical left-wing progressive Indymedia contributor, earned a spot on death row for assassinating a police officer because of his exposure to radical left wing ideologies. I could just as easily point out they've turned a blind eye time and again to video games, tee shirts, "art," and left wing hate speech which has advocated violence again conservative political figures, authority figures, and the the military. Hell... even Barack Obama himself includes among his friends of many years left-wing terrorists and murderers.
But perhaps the most sinister undertone is the hint of hopefulness among a certain element of the left wing that perhaps someone
will succeed in assassinating Barack Obama.
Such a tragedy would serve as a confirmation of their firmly held beliefs that conservatives are evil, and could possibly trigger a backlash that would fill the anarchists among them with glee. At the same time, an Obama death would provide progressives with a martyred hero in place of what troubles many of them the most; deep-seated and well-placed fears that Barack Obama is
precisely what his record suggests, a shallow, vain, and arrogant opportunist who has created impossible expectations with little possibility that he capable of coming close to meeting those impossibly inflated expectations.
In places liberals don't want to talk about, they'd rather have a martyr than a failure. That is the reason they pounce upon even the remotest possibility of Obama's untimely end with such fervor.
The audacity of hope, indeed.
Update: Druggies never posed a threat.
Three men who authorities initially feared were plotting to assassinate Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention are facing only gun charges — signaling they never posed a real threat.
A federal law enforcement official in Denver said the three men and a woman also arrested on Sunday are not expected to be charged with making threatening statements, conspiracy or other national security-related crimes.
[snip]
The likelihood of an assassination attempt on Democratic presidential candidate Obama was downplayed by law enforcement officials in Colorado and Washington.
"We're absolutely confident there is no credible threat to the candidate, the Democratic National Convention, or the people of Colorado," U.S. Attorney Troy Eid said in a statement.
Another AP account offers
telling information, including statements that could reasonably be interpreted as clues that the weapons may have been small caliber, perhaps rimfire rifles.
"The capability and their opportunity and what they had for their weaponry — I don't see that they would have been able to carry it out," the official said on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.
Nearly any centerfire rifle would have to be assumed as at least a somewhat credible threat as an assassination weapon out to several hundred yards at a minimum, but the official seems to indicate that the weapons recovered were not viewed as a significant threat with his remarks about the capability of those arrested and their weaponry. While rimfire rifles can indeed be lethal at close range, they fire tiny bullets at relatively low velocities, severely limiting their effective range.
This seems to be further hinted at in concluding paragraphs:
Law enforcement officials were also investigating whether the men were linked to vandalism shootings that targeted at least two federal buildings in Denver over the past two weeks. Windows were shot at the U.S. Custom House and the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Station on the same street in Denver's downtown Federal District.
Additionally, a bullet was recovered from a Hertz rental car that was hit on Aug. 15, and authorities are now looking to see if it could have matched the guns seized from the men.
If shots fired into federal buildings are only considered vandalism, it once again seems to indicate rimfire weapons. Additionally, most centerfire bullets, rifle or pistol, will either complete penetrate through the sheet metal and glass of cars, or shatter upon impact, in most cases not leaving behind much to recover. A rimfire bullet fired into a vehicle, however, could very well not have enough escape the vehicle or fragment, meaning that authorities could recover a bullet and potentially link it to other attack via the rifling marks left on a bullet.
Comments closed due to spammers.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:41 AM
| Comments (85)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
"Barack Obama himself includes among his friends of many years left-wing terrorists and murderer"
What murderer are you talking about?
Posted by: Nikolay at August 26, 2008 11:08 AM (lgv3U)
2
"Barack Obama himself includes among his friends of many years left-wing terrorists and murderers"
What murderers are you talking about?
Posted by: Nikolay at August 26, 2008 11:09 AM (lgv3U)
3
I agree that it wasn't much of a plot. I do take exception to your analysis regarding how difficult a shot might be. When I was in the army we were expected to hit a pop-up at 300 yards without a scope. We did regularly and we were not graduates of any sniper school. probably never woul
Posted by: Seth at August 26, 2008 11:55 AM (ym9Ho)
4
Seth,
Thanks for your comment - I was beginning to wonder if the Army was training supermen based on what we need just to qualify.
Note: any average person with zeroed mechanical sights (not a scope) should be able to knock off the 50 and 100 meter targets all day long from a supported position. The 200s and 250s should also be regularly hit. The 300... well, I tended to save those bullets.

Posted by: SGT Jeff (USAR) at August 26, 2008 12:22 PM (yiMNP)
5
Nikolai, where do we start?
PM Raila Odinga of Kenya, first cousin of Barack, is a bloody Marxist hybrid, who wants to impose Sharia against the wishes of the US backed government...Barack flew to Kenya and supports him wholeheartedly!!!
BTW, Odinga's son is named Fidel, probably one of your heroes, Nikolay!
We know that Che Guevara posters were placed in Obama's Houston campaign office.
We know of his association with William Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn.
We know of his associations with Muslim radicals in Chicago who have funneled money to Hezbollah and Hamas.
We know of his desire to meet, without pre-conditions, Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jong Il, Ahmedinejad, Assad, etc.
We know he thinks we can't lecture the Russians about Georgia, because we are an invading force throughout the world.
We know his muse in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, an unrepentant communist.
I can go on and on....
Posted by: Carlos Echevarria at August 26, 2008 12:25 PM (WTS66)
6
Look for Dave Neiwert at Orcinus to get all lathered up about this one. He's about the number one fabulist on right wing hate groups and conspiracies. Thet're right around every corner for Dave. It's a wonder he can sleep at night.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 26, 2008 12:31 PM (i/fLn)
7
Hey Carlos! Since you seem to believe every email that you've ever received, I've got some money in a Nigerian bank account that I'll let you keep 20% of. Just send me your bank account info and I'll be sure to wire it to you.
Posted by: Nuff Ced McGreavey at August 26, 2008 01:17 PM (U1V8D)
8
Carlos, even by the non-existent standards that you guys enjoy, he asked for the murderers of Obama's acquaintance. You mentioned people who freak you out, but ideology you don't agree with does not a murderer make.
Nice try with Bernadette Dorn though.
Actually, not. It's pathetic. Really.
But let's play the stupid game: Do you know that George Bush met -- and fell in love with -- Russian KGB butcher Vladimir Putin?
You guys scrape whatever it is that's 20 yards beneath the barrel.
Posted by: Jay B. at August 26, 2008 01:18 PM (x7Shh)
9
IIRC, when I served we zeroed our M-16s at 25 meters. Given the trajectory this also meant they were zeroed at 250 meters. Like Seth, I regularly hit the 300 meter pop-up silhouettes and I'm no professional sniper.
Posted by: Itchy Brother at August 26, 2008 01:19 PM (mYJgW)
10
What murderers are you talking about?
Barack Obama's fundraiser hostess Bernadine Dohrn, in specific, who is believed to have to have both built and placed the bomb at a San Francisco's Park Police Station. FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl said Bill Ayers told him Dorhn was responsible for the blast. San Francisco Police Sgt. Brian McDonnell died two days later, and is the only bomb death in the SFPD's long history.
* * *
Regarding the ability to hit the target at "x" distance, I see that many of you are citing your military marksmanship experience, where M16s with open sights are used in slow fire prone to what, 500 yards?
I'm not saying that folks can't hit such targets by any stretch of the imagination and perhaps should have phrased things much more specifically, but that they have to be trained shooters, especially if you're only going to get one shot, firing at a target on a different vertical plane. When you get ranging shots, on horizontal targets at known distances, effectively using previous misses to dial follow-up rounds on target, of course you can hit the target.
It's when you have one shot, and one shot only at unknown distances on different planes where it gets very difficult to make the longer shots with one bullet.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at August 26, 2008 01:41 PM (xNV2a)
11
Barack Obama's fundraiser hostess Bernadine Dohrn, in specific, who is believed to have to have both built and placed the bomb at a San Francisco's Park Police Station. FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl said Bill Ayers told him Dorhn was responsible for the blast. San Francisco Police Sgt. Brian McDonnell died two days later, and is the only bomb death in the SFPD's long history.
You'd think that armed with hearsay evidence from an FBI informant, they'd have been able to at least arrest Dorhn and charge her with murder. But they didn't. Were the cops that inept? The feds? Hmmm....
Why they even opened the case up again in 1999 -- and no indictments, no indictments were handed down.
So what's the proof you have that EVERYONE else didn't have back in the day?
Posted by: Jay B. at August 26, 2008 02:05 PM (x7Shh)
12
The Feds was that inept... if you want to Google it, they screwed up a lot of prosecutions with illegally obtained evidence via COINTELPRO. It is hardly surprising that cases that have their primary evidence compromised of ten result in failed prosecution, and even less surprising that lacking such evidence, a grand jury convened almost two decades later couldn't find enough additional evidence to prosecute.
There is a difference between having evidence, and having legal evidence, just as not being convicted doesn't mean people aren't guilty as Hell... right, O.J.?
As Ayers himself once famously said regarding his own treasonous, terrorist acts:
"Guilty as hell, free as a bird—America is a great country."
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at August 26, 2008 02:15 PM (xNV2a)
13
Not to mention, on all Army down-range feedback lanes, the target only needs to be nicked to get scored a hit. I recall during my qualifications, hitting the berm on the 200 meter target, still recording a "hit" because the ricochet hit the target or kicked up debri enough to still score on it. Drill Sgt was laughing and said "Grace of god, private!"
Posted by: Jimi at August 26, 2008 02:17 PM (YoMR0)
14
All down-range feedback lanes in Army qualifications require only a "nick" to score a hit. I recorded a hit on a 200 meter target when my round struck the berm right in front of the target, the ricochet or debri kicked up by the round still managed to knock down the target (which I didn't see) while my drill sgt was yelling "Grace of God private!" behind me. My spotter/scorer had to tell me WTF he was yelling about afterwards. I'm lucky it was my practice qualifcation cause his laughter caused me to miss my next target.
Posted by: Jimi at August 26, 2008 02:30 PM (YoMR0)
15
>>There is a difference between having evidence, and having legal evidence
So, where's your evidence, peckerwood?
Posted by: Notnowjohn at August 26, 2008 02:50 PM (yx2x9)
16
Let's see: six goofballs in New jersey hatch a half-baked plan to storm a major army base with rifles. That's a major terrorist plot that justifies the war on terror.
Four goofballs in Denver hatch a half-baked plan to assassinate a presidential candidate with rifles. That's a paranoid liberal fantasy bordering on macabre desire among liberals to see it actually happen.
Hmmm...
Posted by: LostSailor at August 26, 2008 03:44 PM (D8XQ+)
17
Was this whole bit a "sympathy ploy" for his Obamaness or something? As if a geeked up crank head could hit the broad side of a bark an a real good day. JEEEESH!
Posted by: Tonto (USA) at August 26, 2008 04:24 PM (Qv1xF)
18
Back in my day every Marine had to qualify at 200, 300 and 500 yards with non-scoped M-16s. I can hit a much smaller than man-sized target 100 yards out today with an iron-site lever action rifle. While I agree with the rest of your analysis I think you pretty badly under-estimate weapon range and accuracy.
Posted by: Cowboy is a compliment at August 26, 2008 05:07 PM (KtP6p)
19
So you're saying that Lee Harvey Oswald couldn't possibly have killed Kennedy? That's comforting.
Posted by: Shygetz at August 26, 2008 05:14 PM (Gl3TQ)
20
Oswald, a Marine Corps-trained sharpshooter, fired his first shot at JFK at just 58 yards, and his final shot at 88 yards.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at August 26, 2008 05:35 PM (HcgFD)
21
Shygetz, Oswald was a Marine-trained marksman who once certified as a sharpshooter. The shots he fired at JFK were between 58 yards for the first shot, and 88 yards for the longest.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at August 26, 2008 05:42 PM (HcgFD)
22
I see that many of you are citing your military marksmanship experience, where M16s with open sights are used in slow fire prone to what, 500 yards?
500 meters actually, prone position, slow fire, open sites. 10 out of 10 in the black on a man sized target, April 1982. I was dished one miss in the 300 offhand position though. 236 out of 250 possible including the (supposed) miss.
I paid attention to the range instructor though.
Posted by: DaveW at August 26, 2008 05:44 PM (mfNJm)
23
A rifle sighted for 750 yard shots in the hands of a meth user is less dangerous to the intended target than the surrounding bystanders. Several years ago when I shot silhouettes fairly regularly, I had to give up coffee for 5 days prior to going to the range in order to even place the crosshairs on the 500 yard ram long enough to have a chance of hitting it. A meth addict would be shaking so severely that it would be highly unlikely that s/he would ever find the target in the view window of the scope at 750 yards, even using bench bags.
Posted by: Boss429 at August 26, 2008 06:09 PM (JP9Jo)
24
I will note that though the autorities are playing down the actual threat level to Sen. Obama these dorks aren't being released. Some expressed their desire to kill him and had weapons. As drugged out and stupid as they likely are, they are going to get the full course of federal law.
And that will not be fun for them.
Threat to a presidential candidate: yes.
Capable of pulling it off: unlikely.
Length of likely stay at Club Fed: the maximum.
My reaction: Give 'em the max that can be done.
They should have stopped at cow-tipping.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at August 26, 2008 06:14 PM (TUWci)
25
They should have stopped at cow-tipping.
BWAAAAAHAAAAHAAAA!!!!!
"It's funny because it's true."
~Homer J. Simpson
Posted by: dixiechiken at August 26, 2008 07:05 PM (V4FvP)
26
Going with Boss429 on this one... a tweeker couldn't possibly be able to hit anything with any decent degree of accuracy. Read John Plaster's treatises "Sniper" if you want a good 'how to' book, or you can do what I did and go to Benning's "One Shot One Kill" School.
Just to give a reference as to the difficulty in hitting at 750 YARDS...Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Hathcock in Duc Pho, South Vietnam made a shot that stood for 35 years (until Afghanistan in 2002) at a recorded 2,500 yards, or 2,250 metres using a .50 Cal or 12.7mm round... somehow I don't think these guys were or are in the Gunny's league. Nor do I think they had a .50 at their disposal. The current record for a shot using a 7.62x54mm round (.308 Commercial) is currently Staff Sgt., Jim Gilliland. he currently holds the record for a 7.62mm round shot... at 1,250 meters in Ramadi in 2004.
Posted by: Big Country at August 26, 2008 08:20 PM (niydV)
27
As Ayers himself once famously said regarding his own treasonous, terrorist acts:
"Guilty as hell, free as a bird—America is a great country."He talked about being guilty of bombing buildings, not about murdering people. If fact, he is quite emphatic that he never killed anyone.
Posted by: Nikolay at August 27, 2008 03:52 AM (RNpZs)
28
Sweet Christ, you right wing nuts really are... nuts. You really live by the notion that if you say something enough, it actually becomes true.
The good news is that Obama WILL be the next president, whether you nutjobs like it or not, and we can begin to move away from your insane thinking. Your time is over, boys.
Posted by: Tony at August 27, 2008 09:43 AM (GLZ/C)
29
Where are these lefties hoping Obama gets assassinated? I live in NYC and I've never met any. I think they must be a figment of your fevered imagination.
Posted by: Robert S. at August 27, 2008 09:45 AM (ocFg6)
30
Thanks for pointing out how well you know LIBERALS. Your capacity for personaly empthy is astounding. Obviously, all of us LIBERALS would like to see Obama murdered. That would be great. In fact, that's why we voted for the guy in the first place. Because we're as conniving and craven as you wingnuts are.
Sarcasm aside, George Bush is the most successful murderer in recent world history. McCain is friends with him. Kind of invalidates your whole point about Obama's friends, don't it?
Posted by: Reed at August 27, 2008 09:54 AM (bmgov)
31
You are a fucking PIG.
Posted by: Chaz at August 27, 2008 09:55 AM (fEVvj)
32
This is the most idiotic post I've ever read, and anyone who takes anything you say seriously is worthy of a straight-jacket, as are you...
Posted by: edsbowlingshoe at August 27, 2008 09:57 AM (X9LlJ)
33
This is really a hateful site. I am a fiscal conservative and social tolerant. My politics are much more Goldwater with a few exception, than anything else. I left the party in the 90's with the rise of the Rush Limbaugh and evangelical movement. These people are nothing but opportunists looking to make a buck and don't give a damn about the country. If you want an example of empty hype you need look no further than our current administration. Anyone who took a single class in world history or even had a passing interest in the last 60 years of middle east history knew we were being sold a bill of goods. I grew up lower middle class but succeeded to make an income in the top 2% or so. I am not even the group that this administrations policies help. They are geared to the top .1% or so. Obama is not a bad man. He is a self made man. He comes from a modest background and through his own talents and work made it to his current position. The Democratic party is the worst we have with the exception of Republicans. The best of the Rep party have left. I would have loved to see a Hagel/Bloomberg ticket (in that order) but given our choices of a man stuck in the last century and showing clear evidence of mental decline and Obama, that is easy.
Obama is not that liberal. He is left center and very pragmatic in many ways. I long for an America where science and reason rule the day and stupid superstitions and sound bytes and transparent talking heads are seen for what they are.
Posted by: dabouv at August 27, 2008 10:12 AM (UfWP5)
34
"Such a tragedy would serve as a confirmation of their firmly held beliefs that conservatives are evil"
Well, no -- but this post is a confirmation of my deeply held belief that conservative bloggers are idiots.
Posted by: dpoyesac at August 27, 2008 10:13 AM (JRxps)
35
Steadfastly reaching for new lows in journalism on a daily basis
Posted by: Mike at August 27, 2008 10:21 AM (1e2Ga)
36
RE: associations with murders
It's interested to hear that people concerned with Obama's associations with terrorists. Are you also concerned with Bush's association with terrorist sympathizers such as Elliot Abrams, Otto Reich, John Negroponte - men who participated in supporting terrorists throughout Central America, men who do not believe in democracy in the United States (their participation in the Iran Contra scandal was expressly illegal) or elsewhere (evidenced by their support for dictators in El Salvador and Guatemala)?
Posted by: steelcity at August 27, 2008 10:25 AM (WbBEJ)
37
Do you ever just sit back and read what you've actually written. I mean, this is literally insane. I hope you catch a bullet in your dome while your family watches.
Oh, and I'm voting for McCain.
Posted by: Stacy at August 27, 2008 10:34 AM (jwPlH)
38
A rifle sighted for 750 yard shots in the hands of a meth user is less dangerous to the intended target than the surrounding bystanders.
That's comforting. I guess the cops should let them go, then, if all they're going to do is kill innocent bystanders.
Posted by: Mike at August 27, 2008 10:41 AM (dPk0t)
39
Please tell me this post is a put-on. Right? I mean, as depraved and as vile and as delusional and as paranoid and as just plain vicious as the whack-job right wing can be sometimes, this is just too ghoulish and obscene to be taken even remotely seriously. So, it's got to be just a rather lame and pathetic and not terribly funny attempt at a joke, right? Right?
Posted by: John at August 27, 2008 10:45 AM (qHF5N)
40
I see a lot of Sullivan readers found their way over here.
Posted by: Lee at August 27, 2008 11:07 AM (TxTIh)
41
And people want to chastise Obama as being un-patriotic. Look at the comments here, this is open discussion about a political motivated murder. What do you think terrorism is? Its politically motivated violence used against innocents in order to bring about political change.
This is America, not Zimbabwe. You are not dignified to salute the stars and stripes
Posted by: Matthew at August 27, 2008 11:41 AM (ElXdQ)
42
"I mean, as depraved and as vile and as delusional and as paranoid and as just plain vicious as the whack-job right wing can be sometimes, this is just too ghoulish and obscene to be taken even remotely seriously"
John, you mean like the depraved vile delusional paranoid just plain vicious left wing whack jobs called " 9/11 Truthers" who are too ghoulish to be taken seriously by anyone-- except liberals!
Posted by: Huntress at August 27, 2008 12:00 PM (Qn9iF)
43
"I see a lot of Sullivan readers found their way over here."
You think?
Did the overwrought essence that says "internet drama queen", except with extra estrogen, give it away?
Posted by: RW at August 27, 2008 12:47 PM (mHiW8)
44
Huntress:
Uh, no, not really. From what I have been able to discern, most of the "9/11 Truthers" defy easy political categorization. They're just nuts. But, if anything, they more closely resemble the kind of conspiratorial, paranoic, "black helicopter" types that populate various right-wing survivalist web sites than they do your typical lefty.
Posted by: John at August 27, 2008 01:00 PM (qHF5N)
45
damn, Confederate Yankee, looking at these trolls' comments, I gotta say it again:
"You know you're over the Target when you start taking Flak"...
Posted by: HKpistole at August 27, 2008 01:10 PM (/j9KS)
46
Which part is too vile disgusting and repusive to talk about? Is it the meth-heads, the lefties or the notion of assasination in general? Before you answer, read the links.
Posted by: Pablo at August 28, 2008 06:06 AM (c9oNH)
47
thank you very good mirc mirc indir mýrc indir mirc inndir mirc yükle mýrc türkçe mirc mirc download kameralý mirc kaçak kaçak script kelebek kelebek indir kelebek script indir indir Lida Dai Dai Hua Jiao Nang Seo Yarýþmasý sohbet chat chat sohbet sohbet sitesi chat sitesi film indir divx film indir divx indir film izle dizi izle mp4 film indir ilahi ilahi sohbet ilahi chat islami sohbet islami chat ilahiler ilahi dinle ilahi sohbet ilahi limewire indir limewire limewire yükle türkçe limewire türkçe limewire indir hello very good nice galery I congratulate
Posted by: mirc at March 13, 2009 12:18 PM (+Xc25)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 25, 2008
Obama: Leave My Terrorist Friends Alone!
This attempt by Barack Obama to minimize the murderous acts of his long-time terrorist friends is pathetic.
Allahpundit
notes:
His argument is so weak that it doesn't really qualify as an argument: Yes, we're friendly, but it's ancient history and I denounced what he did, so what’s the big deal about socializing with, um, an unrepentant terrorist? As for the submoronic point about Ayers's crimes having been committed when Obama was eight — a staple of the left's feeble defense of him on this subject — imagine what the reaction would be if Bobby Jindal, say, had struck up a chummy pen pal correspondence with Charles Manson while in his late 20s.
Charles Manson, you say?
Yes we can.
On the morning of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, along with a million other readers of the New York Times (including many who would never be able to read the paper again), I opened its pages to be confronted by a color photo showing a middle-aged couple holding hands and affecting a defiant look at the camera. In retrospect, the article's headline could not have been more flesh-crawling: "No Regrets for a Love of Explosives." The couple pictured were Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, former leaders of the 1960s' Weather Underground, America's first terrorist cult. One of their bombing targets, as it happened, was the Pentagon.
"I don't regret setting bombs," Ayers was quoted in the opening line of the Times' profile. "I feel we didn't do enough." In 1969, Ayers and his wife convened a "War Council" in Flint, Mich., whose purpose was to launch a military front inside the United States with the purpose of helping Third World revolutionaries conquer and destroy it. Taking charge of the podium, dressed in high-heeled boots and a leather miniskirt -- her signature uniform -- Dorhn incited the assembled radicals to join the war against "Amerikkka" and create chaos and destruction in the "belly of the beast." Her voice rising to a fevered pitch, Dohrn raised three fingers in a "fork salute" to mass murderer Charles Manson, whom she proposed as a symbol to her troops. Referring to the helpless victims of the Manson Family as the "Tate Eight " (the pregnant actress Sharon Tate had been stabbed in her womb with a fork), Dohrn shouted: "Dig it. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim's stomach! Wild! "
Oh,
yes, kids.
The lovely Ms. Dohrn, Mrs. Bill Ayers, is not just the hostess of Barack Obama's first fundraiser, but an enthusiastic fan of the way Charles Mason's cult murdered a woman who was almost nine months pregnant. Dorhn is suspected of multiple terrorist acts, including building and planting the bomb that detonated at San Francisco's Park Police Station, killing one police officer and blinding another.
Bill Ayers admits directly being involved in attacks on New York City Police Headquarters, the Capitol building, and the Pentagon.
Fellow Weathermen had 100 sticks of dynamite and boxes of roofing nails they were making into pipe bombs to massacre revelers at an non-commissioned officers dance at Fort Dix. Ayer's girlfriend at the time, Diana Oughton, was building one of the nail-filled bombs when it went off in her hands. Instead of unsuspecting soldiers and their innocent dates, these terrorists killed only themselves, that time.
Dohrn worked at the law firm of Sidley Austin thanks to Ayers family connections with the firm. Other famous lawyers at Sidley Austin you might know include summer associate Barack Obama and Michelle Robinson, later Michelle Obama.
Funny, how the incestuous circle ties itself in knots.
Barack Obama has been involved with the Ayers clan since
1987, when Obama led the Developing Communities Project, a component of the ABCs Coalition coordinated by Bill Ayers and led by Ayer's father. The Woods Fund, the Chicago Anneberg Challenge... Barack and Michelle Obama has a paper trail with the Ayers clan and Bernadine Dohrn that goes back more than two decades, and appears to be not just professional, but personal. Obama felt comfortable having his first fundraiser at the home of well-known terrorists, and I wonder; did the Obama's ever return the favor, having Dorhn and Ayers as guests in their mansion? Does Barack Obama's "judgment to lead" include exposing his elementary-aged daughters to cold-blooded killers in their own home?
Barack Obama wants to convince us that it shouldn't matter that Bill Ayers, Ayer's dead terrorist bomber girlfriend, his terrorist wife and their cronies declared war on the United States and murdered its citizens. The murders, the treason, the bombings of American targets in a war they declared... all distractions. And I was eight.
The simple fact of the matter is that though he has been given numerous chances, Barack Obama will not refute his terrorist friends. Instead, he just attempts to minimize their crimes.
Americans have every right to question why.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:50 PM
| Comments (35)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
What is it with the democrats nominating vicious America haters? First Kerry and now Obama. Kerry went to Paris and tried negotiating with the enemy and then came home and smeared our military. If it wasn't treason it was obviously sedition. Now we get Obama who attended an America hating church and hangs out with treasonous terrorists.
That's why I could have lived with a Hillary presidency. She doesn't hate this country per se, she's in it for herself. She really doesn't have any convictions of her own. At least she wouldn't damage or attempt to destroy our democracy. No doubt that Obama or Kerry who both have a seething rage for our Constitution would/will attempt to destroy our freedoms.
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 25, 2008 09:49 PM (kNqJV)
2
Destroy our freedoms? No, neither Kerry nor Obama would do that. And even if they would, they're too late: Bush and Cheney did enough harm to our Constitution and our freedoms with the "Patriot" Act, etc.
Posted by: larrys at August 25, 2008 10:06 PM (PMlL4)
3
OK, can someone, resonably, explain to my someone like Barack Obama would *ever* associate with a man like this? Especially given that he was pretty clearly always interested in advancing politically? Is it that it just doesn't matter that you associate with monsters (yes, literally) like this in the Chicago 'machine'? Anyone?
Posted by: ECM at August 25, 2008 10:44 PM (q3V+C)
4
ECM: In answer to that, you'd have to look at the pathology involved. Age, Time, Parental Influence... Look at this way, Ayers fulfilled a father figure and his wife, well, she smacks of being a run-to-form twin to Obama's Mama. It was very tres chic to bring home a Black Man in the 60's as a slap to the status Quo, which is what Ayers and his wife strove to be... "Revolutionaries"
The Liberal, Left Wing Reactionaries, who were able to, through the "Reformed neo-terrorist Coffee Klastch" that seemed to be the modus operendi of these people. Why destroy the system from outside when you can do it from within? And do it through legitimate means. Obama was able to enter into the 'Chicago Machine' and utilize their basic nutroot support system. I mean lets face it... his mother was a rebellious world wanderer who happened to shack up with the current "Revolutionary Flavor Of The Month" (first an African-African, then an Indonesian)... It's not racist per se to say that middle class white women from Middle America shacked up with these people... more like Du Jure racism, but also, look at the times... it was the 60s. Mixed Race couples were frequently frowned upon, if not outrigh attacked.
He probably saw these two scumbags as surrogates, and in their case, they found a perfect politician to back, and thereby achieve the thing that bombthrowing was unable to do... Classic 5th Column work. Obama probably didn't or may still not fully grasp the ideas and people with whom he's associated with... or even more scary, he has, doesn't give a sh*t, and has plans that will be a source of unending nightmares for the rest of us.
Posted by: Big Country at August 26, 2008 12:07 AM (KYpRJ)
5
"Bill Ayers admits directly being involved in attacks on New York City Police Headquarters, the Capitol building, and the Pentagon.
Fellow Weathermen had 100 sticks of dynamite and boxes of roofing nails they were making into pipe bombs to massacre revelers at an non-commissioned officers dance at Fort Dix."
Ayers is quoted as saying that he only regrets that he didn't do more. If he and his pals had three airliners to fly into those buildings, instead of dynamite and roofing nails, is there any reason to doubt they would have used them?
The only part of that scenario that seems implausible is that the planers of the attack might have had a hard time getting one of those dandy revolutionaries to volunteer to be the pilot.
Posted by: George Bruce at August 26, 2008 12:37 AM (ci1xz)
6
Why are Ayers and his wife walking free? Shouldn't they have been given life sentences? Thank you so much for this information - the Democratic Party has truly become the party of traitors.
Posted by: Krystal at August 26, 2008 08:02 AM (D2TAc)
7
Nice broadcasting license you've got there. You wouldn't want to lose it by running that advertisement linking Barack Obama to Bill Ayers would you? Didn't think so.
MoveOn. Nothing to see here.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 26, 2008 10:33 AM (i/fLn)
8
As I understand it, Dohrn did do some time for related charges, a good stretch though not enough for me. Ayers avoided any prison time after years as a fugitive, turning himself in and hiring a serious defense. Since he was a terrorist, as opposed to a garden-variety murderer, the FBI surveilled him and otherwise gathered evidence without adhering strictly enough to criminal procedures. Much of the evidence was inadmissable but the question of Ayers guilt is not open. He brags of his treason. This group seems to have generated sympathy with a certain brand of dolt through their incompetence and absurdist bile. That is hard to imagine but obvious. Ayers, a trust-fund radical, would be quite objectionable even without the bombings. His career radicalizing education has been as destructive as any act of terror one could imagine. This character is truly, explicitly and proudly Anti-American. That he has prospered in Chicago politics is a blot on the sense and decency of those citizens. If he can get his hand-picked soulmate into the Presidency and in a scant 8 or 10 years of trying it will be a blot on the sense and decency of us all. But mostly leftwing Democrats.
Posted by: megapotamus at August 26, 2008 10:56 AM (LF+qW)
9
These posts give pretty good insight into the Ayers connection and their ideology in their own
words.
The Friends of Barack Obama, Part 1
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020358.php
The Friends of Barack Obama, Part 2
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020362.php
Obama made a big mistake by putting out an ad and then going to the DOJ to try and suppress the publicizing of his extensive ties to Ayers/Dohrn.
McCain now can hit him hard and should since he
is providing such a weak defense.
Obama will be shown to be a liar when his statements about just having a casual relationship
with one of his neighbors is shown to be an extensive working relationship that involved millions of dollars being wasted on their failed
education reform.
On a side note,pregnant actress Sharon Tate was not stabbed with a fork in the stomach,it was Leno
Labianca that had the word "WAR" carved(by Tex Watson) into his stomach with a cooking fork and then Krenwinkle stabbed him repeatedly because she liked to watch the fork "wiggle" when stuck in his body.
Posted by: Baxter Greene at August 26, 2008 03:31 PM (5NHPy)
10
The trust fund radicals are so odd. They enjoy the fruit, but would chop down the tree it comes from.
They must think that they would then be in charge (taking out daddy and grand-daddy) when the one in charge would be a Stalin, who would destroy them for being 'politically unreliable', as their parents were 'former persons'.
So narcissitic.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at August 26, 2008 06:26 PM (TUWci)
11
Bob, you ought to cover Alex Jones' incitation to murder Michelle Malkin. For all that grief the libs spread over Rush Limbaugh's "Hate"-speech, here's a lib talk-show host screaming and out of his ever-loving-mind at a woman, urging people to "Get Her!"
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/live-from-dnc-malkin-in-jeopardy/
I wonder what dear Pamela Troy would say about this? Maybe this is the face of tolerance?
Posted by: Vercingetorix at August 26, 2008 10:30 PM (QaVQ6)
12
thank you very good mirc mirc indir mýrc indir mirc inndir mirc yükle mýrc türkçe mirc mirc download kameralý mirc kaçak kaçak script kelebek kelebek indir kelebek script indir indir Lida Dai Dai Hua Jiao Nang Seo Yarýþmasý sohbet chat chat sohbet sohbet sitesi chat sitesi film indir divx film indir divx indir film izle dizi izle mp4 film indir ilahi ilahi sohbet ilahi chat islami sohbet islami chat ilahiler ilahi dinle ilahi sohbet ilahi limewire indir limewire limewire yükle türkçe limewire türkçe limewire indir hello very good nice galery I congratulate
Posted by: mirc at March 13, 2009 12:17 PM (+Xc25)
13
ãäÊÏì -
ãäÊÏíÇÊ -
ÚÐÈ -
ÚÐÈ ÇáßáÇã - ãäÊÏì ÚÐÈ ÇáßáÇã -
ãäÊÏíÇÊ ÚÐÈ ÇáßáÇã
ÇäÇÔíÏ -
ÃäÇÔíÏ ÇÓáÇãíÉ -
ÇäÇÔíÏ 2009 -
ÇäÇÔíÏ ÇØÝÇá ØíæÑ ÇáÌäÉ -
ÃäÇÔíÏ ÌÏíÏÉ -
ÇäÇÔíÏ mp3
ÓíÇÍå
- ÓíÇÍå æÓÝÑ -
ÓíÇÍÉ ãÕÑ -
ÓíÇÍå ãÇáíÒíÇ -
ÓíÇÍÉ ÊÑßíÇ -
ÓíÇÍÊí -
ÓíÇÍÉ 2009
ÇÒíÇÁ -
ÃÒíÇÁ 2009 - ÝÓÊÇä ÓåÑå -
ÝÓÇÊíä -
ÇßÓÓæÇÑÇÊ -
ÝÓÇÊíä ÓåÑÉ
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ -
ãßíÇÌ -
ÚØæÑÇÊ -
ÞÕÇÊ ÔÚÑ -
ÇäÇÞå -
ÊÓÑíÍÇÊ ÔÚÑ -ãíß
ÂÈ - ÚäÇíå ÈÇáÈÔÑÉ -
ÈÏßíÑ æãäßíÑ
Ïíᑥ -
ÇËÇË -
ÛÑÝ -
ÏíßæÑÇÊ -
ÇËÇË ãäÒáí -
ÛÑÝ äæã
ÕæÑ×ÕæÑ -
ÕæÑ -
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ -
ÕæÑ ÇØÝÇá -
ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ -
ÕæÑ ãÊÍÑßå -
ÕæÑ ãÖÍßå -
ÕæÑ ÛÑíÈÉ -
ÕæÑ ØÈíÚíÉ
ÇáÚÇÈ -
ÇáÚÇÈ ÈäÇÊ -
ÇáÚÇÈ ÊáÈíÓ -
ÇáÚÇÈ 2009 -
ÇáÚÇÈ ÈÇÑÈí -
ÇáÚÇÈ Êáæíä -
ÇáÚÇÈ ÝáÇÔíå -
ÇáÚÇÈ ÇßÔä
ÊáÝÒíæä -
ÇÝáÇã -
ãÓáÓáÇÊ -
ãÓáÓáÇÊ ÊÑßíÉ -
ÇÝáÇã ÇÌäÈíå -
ÓíäãÇÁ -
ãÓÑÍíÇÊ
äÇÏí ÇáäÕÑ -
äÇÏí ÇáåáÇá -
äÇÏí ÇáÇÊÍÇÏ -
ãÍãÏ äæÑ -
íÇÓÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí -
ÓÚÏ ÇáÍÇÑËí -
ÕæÑ íÇÓÑ ÇáÞÍØÇäí -
ÕæÑ ÓÚÏ ÇáÍÇÑËí
ÊæÈíßÇÊ -
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãáæäå -
ÊæÈíßÇÊ 2009 -
ÊæÈßÇÊ -
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÌÏíÏÉ -
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÈ - ÊæÈíßÇÊ ÍÒíäÉ
ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÕæÑ ãÓä -
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ ááãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÌÏíÏÉ -
ÕæÑ ãÇÓäÌÑ 2009
ÈÑÇãÌ ãÇÓäÌÑ - ÈÑÇãÌ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÈáÕ 8
ÈÑÇãÌ ãÇÓäÌÑ 8 -
ÈÑÇãÌ
ãÓä ÈáÕ - ÈÑÇãÌ ãÇÓäÌÑ ÌÏíÏå
ÓãÇíáÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÇíÞæäÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
ÇÈÊÓÇãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
Ëíã
ãÓä - ËíãÇÊ ãÇÓäÌÑ -
Ëíã ãÇÓäÌÑíÇÊ
ÈÑäÇãÌ ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÊÕÇãíã ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÕæÑ ááÊÕÇãíã -
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ
ááÊÕÇãíã - ÕæÑ ÊÕãíã -
ÕæÑ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
ÇÏæÇÊ ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÝáÇÊÑ ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÇßÔä ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÝÑÔ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
- ÓßÑÇÈÒ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
ÎØæØ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
- ÈÇÊÑíä ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÓÊÇíáÇÊ ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ -
ÏæÑÉ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
ÎÇãÇÊ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
ÈÑÇãÌ -
ÈÑÇãÌ ßãÈíæÊÑ - ÈÑÇãÌ ÍÕÑíå -
ÈÑÇãÌ ÃÕáíå
ÈÑÇãÌ 2009
ÈÑÇãÌ ÌæÇá -
ËíãÇÊ ÌæÇá -
äÛãÇÊ -
äÛãÇÊ ÌæÇá
ÑÓÇÆá
æÓÇÆØ - ÑÓÇÆá
mms -
ÑÓÇÆá ÌæÇá
ãÞÇØÚ ÝíÏíæ -
ÈáæÊæË -
ãÞÇØÚ ãÖÍßå -
ãÞÇØÚ ÈáæÊæË -
ÈáæÊæË 2009
ÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ -
ÓæíÊÔ ãÇßÓ -
ÏÑæÓ ÓæíÔ ãÇßÓ -
ãáÝÇÊ ãÝÊæÍå
Posted by: gh at June 10, 2009 06:43 AM (O3GbB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thank You, Barack
I hope that I am one of the first of American gun owners to thank Barack Obama for choosing Joe Biden as his running mate. You see, I had almost forgotten just how much Joe Biden has done for gun owners and gun ownership in America, until Roger Simon reminded me.
As author of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994—also known as the
Biden Crime Law according to Wikipedia—Biden's carefully-manicured hands shaped the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, a law pushed through by Democrats that specifically outlawed 19 firearms by name, and tried to outlaw many others by outlawing firearms that had two or more mostly-cosmetic features.
Because of the attempt to outlaw semi-automatic weapons by Biden and his fellow Democrats, interest in owning variations of semi-automatic rifles—and specifically those firearms Democrats ineptly tried to outlaw—began surging in 1994 and has ever slowed down, even though the law itself expired four years ago.
AR-15 and AK-pattern rifles in particular became very popular sellers during the "ban," and Biden deserves considerable credit for sparking interest in a portion of the market that until then was considered the realm of survivalists and military collectors. Now one can hardly visit a rifle shooting range without hearing the characteristic crack of a 5.56mm AR-15, or the boom of an AK-47's .30 caliber bullet, and both weapons often dominate the showcases of gun dealers. Far from banning assault weapons, the 1994 law Biden created helped marshal semi-automatics into the mainstream as some of America's
best-selling firearms, while creating jobs for skilled workers at gun and ammunition companies rushing to satisfy customer demand for one of the few market segments that has kept growing.
In addition to what he's done for interest in assault rifles, we also owe Senator Biden and his fellow Democrats a special thanks for helping create an entirely new class of small, powerful, and easily concealable handguns.
One of the provisions of the 1994 law Biden drafted was a stipulation that pistol magazines would be limited to just ten rounds. At the time Biden drafted his law, American shooters were enthralled with large, heavy, service-class semi-automatic pistols with magazine capacities that seemed ever-increasing. In the age of the "wonder-nine," pistols carrying 15-18 rounds per magazine became fashionable, but Biden's law helped push the market in a radically different direction.
With handguns now limited to a specified magazine capacity by an arbitrary law, interest then grew in designing semi-auto pistols that were smaller, lighter, more powerful, and in most respects, more effective than those that came before them. An entire niche of compact and subcompact "carry guns" is directly attributable to Biden and his fellow Democrats, and these days nearly every company that make handguns serves this burgeoning market, with new models for this market sector being created every season. Entire gun companies—the very successful
Kahr Arms is one shining example—arose almost purely as the result of consumer interest generated by Joe Biden's "gun ban."'
Entire shooting organizations—the
IDPA, for instance—have grow as the result of Joe Biden's work, and interest in existing shooting sports in general has also greatly increased. It is fair to say, without exaggeration, that this Senator with an "F" rating from the NRA has done more for shooting sports and gun ownership than any Senator in the past 25 years, even if it was all accidental.
So thank you, Barack Obama, for selecting Joe Biden as your Veep. While it may not be what you intended when you selected him as your running mate, Joe Biden is responsible for far more hope and change within the American shooting community than you could ever know.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
03:24 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Joe Biden - Veep of Unintended Consequences.
Posted by: SSG Jeff (USAR) at August 25, 2008 03:07 PM (yiMNP)
2
Ther is a nice irony to your story line but if they get elected gun owners won't be happy. The Supreme Court will be their target. And they will not miss.
Posted by: mytralman at August 25, 2008 03:53 PM (k+clE)
3
VERY interesting take on moronic gun bans (of course the concept applies to nearly any "ban"). The thought of "them" figuring this out and crafting even more Draconion laws to limit such unintended consequences is a bit scarey though.
Posted by: DoorHold at September 01, 2008 03:14 PM (9c/0u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Monochromatic Coalition
Unity, Obama style:
When talking with the Sun-Times, the Hillary Clinton steering committee member had a word to say about sell-outs:
Taking a final shot at Jones, Cobb said, "Calling me an 'Uncle Tom’'is beyond the pale, especially considering where he is [close] with Mayor Daley and with [Gov.] Blagojevich, I am hardly the Uncle Tom here."
Identity politics — it's what's for dinner in Denver. Can anyone doubt that this same kind of political tactic took place all over Chicago and the US? The fact that it’s still happening now says that Denver may turn out to be a meltdown — if not in front of the cameras, then off-stage.
If Team Obama wanted a show of unity from the Pepsi Center, this indicates that they haven't achieved that goal, probably because they've never set the example. For a campaign that promised post-racial politicking, its candidate and surrogates haven't been above race-baiting at the drop of a hat. This goes hand in hand with Obama's repeated baseless smears of John McCain as a racist. Emil Jones just followed Obama's lead, as Obama has followed his.
Post racial =
everybody is a racist, so the word no longer has any meaning?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:48 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The democrats have a big tent under which to welcome lots of different identity and interest groups, but no dissent is allowed. Fascists.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 25, 2008 09:51 AM (i/fLn)
2
does this mean the pc police are no longer needed?
Posted by: pappy at August 25, 2008 10:10 AM (mZ9mO)
3
It is truly a delight to see the Clintons on the business end of identity politics. We can rest assured, of course, that no lesson will be learned just as no slight is forgotten. Bill has yet to truly speak his mind on these topics. His chance is near at hand. Will he take it? Oh, yes. Strap in, Dems.
Posted by: megapotamus at August 25, 2008 01:49 PM (LF+qW)
4
What happens when each of the major identity groups fights for control of the agenda, each stating that it is their turn at the helm?
Fun for those not involved, that's what!*
*Imagine a civil war in Troy while the Greeks are breaking down the gates. That level of fun - if you are a Hittite or an Egyptian, that is.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at August 25, 2008 07:30 PM (TUWci)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 23, 2008
Oh, the Gaffes We'll Have...
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
06:15 AM
| Comments (49)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I don't think that they are going to get a lift from Biden....in spite of the hot air he produces.
Posted by: Jack at August 23, 2008 07:19 AM (Ss83y)
2
Is it Obama-Biden, or Dukakis-Bentsen?
Posted by: McGehee at August 23, 2008 07:54 AM (K13Au)
3
Slow Joe?? Bwahahahaha!!!! Mr hair plugs??? Bwahahahaha!!! As Mark Levin has been saying for years...."The dumbest man in the Senate"
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 23, 2008 08:38 AM (wUvEV)
4
The dumbest man in the Senate heads the Republican ticket. America can handle gaffes by politicians. What we can't handle is innate stupidity exacerbated by early onset dementia.
Sorry, McBush: the presidency is not a Good Conduct Medal to be awarded for meritorious service half a century ago.
Posted by: larrys at August 23, 2008 11:40 AM (PMlL4)
5
Sorry, CI. But my senator-Patty --"mom in sneakers", "experienced day care worker", "Osama mamma"--Murray has it all over (or is it under?) Slow Joe with regards to lack of intelligence.
larrys:
that's it? Can't you say anything positive about either man at the head of the Dem ticket? wow, that is sad.
Posted by: iconoclast at August 23, 2008 11:46 AM (TzLpv)
6
I too am very happy it's Biden - and relieved he didn't pick Hillary (man, the PUMAs are fuming!)
Now we only have to worry about McCain's choice. Picking Lieberman would be a bad, bad mistake.
The two best choices, in my opinion, are Romney and Palin. And they both have Achilles heels.
Romney - I'm not so worried about the Mormon business. The evangelical I'll-never-vote-for-a -Mormon crowd mainly live in solidly red states. I don't think there are enough of them to flip those states to the Dems.
No, what troubles me is that a McCain/Romney ticket will be painted as Rich and Richer by the Dems, who will play the class warfare card for all it's worth this year to deflect the charge of elitism. From that POV, Biden was a smart choice, because Obama needs to shore up his blue collar creds. When the economy is good, class warfare is a hard sell. Successful businessmen are admired. However, it's a different story when Americans are worried about gas prices, inflation, the housing market, etc. Biden may have a F rating from the NRA but those bitter, gun-toting, bible thumpers might look at a McCain/Romney ticket and think, "Do these guys know what it's like to worry about mortgage payments?"
Palin - She'd certainly spice up the ticket. I like everything I've heard about Palin and was initially very enthusiatic about her. But she's not yet ready for prime time. McCain is 71, that makes his VP choice even more crucial than Obama's. As much as I love the idea of a pro-life, tax-cutting conservative VP who also is pretty and hunts, I can't see her dealing wtih Russia or Iran at this point. Not because Palin is female, but because she just ain't ready.
Both would be better than Lieberman or Huckabee or Ridge. But I'm not breaking out the champagne yet.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 12:04 PM (oWE80)
7
Don't get me wrong - I'm very happy that the Gasbag Express has left the station.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 12:14 PM (oWE80)
8
I really hope McCain picks Palin. If not her then Kay Bailey would do. Picking a woman would really stick it to the Dems. It is to bad there is not a obvious choice in Ohio that is a woman.
Posted by: Chuck at August 23, 2008 01:53 PM (EaKto)
9
Kay Bailey Hutchison (mentioned in at least 2 spots on Fox News this morning) would be an inspired VP pick for McCain. True conservative who would pack in the Hillary supporters.
Posted by: Blutarsky at August 23, 2008 02:03 PM (JTGrM)
10
Yes soccer mom senator is very lacking.
I call the light weight tag team just announced
"Dumbling and Bumbling"
Can you imagine in a crisis "Get Joe on the phone,
Joe, Barack what the hell do we do now?!"
Very scary if these two braniacs were to win.
note for larry's-It appears that you suffer from early onset of lib victim dementia if you are blind to the lack of any substance to Barack!
Posted by: dadinseattle at August 23, 2008 02:14 PM (bEzLC)
11
This is great! An empty suit running for President picks a big mouth empty suit for v.p. And I don't mean to disparage coat hangers.
A community organizer with no experience and another senator that has never done a thing except to blow hot air running for the highest office and most powerful position on earth blows my mind! The libs / demorats have lost their collective minds.
Posted by: Ted at August 23, 2008 02:18 PM (N3N6D)
12
I hadn't thought of Kay Bailey Hutchinson, but yeah, she'd be a good pick. Does she want the position, though?
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 02:26 PM (4dC3f)
13
@Donna V: Surely you kid ...
I can't see her dealing with Russia or Iran at this point. Not because Palin is female, but because she just ain't ready.
Palin grew up in, and was elected to office (repeatedly) in what is one of the most testosterone-drenched states in the USofA. I'm sure she's had plenty of experience dealing with alpha males. She's certainly bright enough to gain command of the issues involved, so I wouldn't expect Vlad and Mahmoud to be much of a problem for a woman who won the votes and respect of oil-field workers!
McCain / Palin 08!
Palin Bio: http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php
Posted by: InfoGeek at August 23, 2008 02:30 PM (DQi6r)
14
After the last 8 years, you would think that Bush voters would stay away from Hindenburg imagery...
Posted by: Jenna at August 23, 2008 04:22 PM (Bf0yG)
15
Obama/Biden "Gaffes, we can"
Posted by: LH at August 23, 2008 05:41 PM (nR4bJ)
16
That poster is spectacular!! I laughed for a good five minutes. Thanks!
Posted by: Rick at August 23, 2008 06:35 PM (tJ+Rw)
17
Infogeek: Hey, I think Palin's great. But she's been gov. of a sparsely populated (even if it is testosterone-drenched) state for 2 years. Before that she was mayor of a small town. I'm sorry, but the GOP can't hammer Obama for his lack of experience and then put Palin on the ticket. The same is true of Jindal. I think they're both promising, exciting young pols who need to govern well in their own states (if Jindal manages to clean up Louisiana, I'll be ready to elect him president of the universe). The GOP doesn't have a lot of shining stars right now - that's the problem and why it's tempting to rush Palin and Jindal to the gates before they're ready. But that would be making the same mistake the Dems did.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 07:02 PM (DLOdQ)
18
Jenna, I have no doubt the last 8 years were dreadful for you and Daily Kos and HuffPo. They've been just hell for al Queda too. The Taliban undoubtably looks back longingly to the salad days of the '90's when they could execute brazen women in stadiums without anybody bothering them.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 07:11 PM (DLOdQ)
19
Well, it's already begun. At their first joint appearance, Obama introduced Biden as the next president, and Biden called The One, "Barack America."
Dear, oh dear.
Posted by: Mike at August 23, 2008 07:50 PM (7XwxY)
20
From AP: "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is calling his running mate, Joe Biden, "a leader who is ready to step in and be president."
So does this mean that he, The Obamamessiah Himself, (PBUH) ISN'T really ready to be the prez? Sounds like a freudian slip if you ask me...
Posted by: Big Country at August 23, 2008 08:15 PM (KYpRJ)
21
I guess Captain America was already taken...
Posted by: Smokin' at August 23, 2008 09:21 PM (qf/a6)
22
What, Donna V.? Palin can't deal with Russia? Have you ever looked at a map?!?
Posted by: Bering Strait at August 23, 2008 09:51 PM (UkEiT)
23
What happens on Attu stays on Attu.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 23, 2008 11:19 PM (6L459)
24
I'm no political junkie but I thought a long time ago that Hutchinson would be a good VP choice and was surprised she wasn't at least mentioned more often.
Posted by: Gary Rosen at August 24, 2008 04:51 AM (sHuCu)
25
"the presidency is not a Good Conduct Medal to be awarded for meritorious service half a century ago."
It ain't a Rookie of the Year award either.
Posted by: Gary Rosen at August 24, 2008 04:53 AM (sHuCu)
26
Yes, I know where Alaska is, thank you very much.I still think Palin is not ready to be a heart beat away from the presidency. (I'd still vote for a McCain/Palin ticket, but I think the Dems would happily seize on her inexperience as a way of taking the focus off of Obama's inexperience.)
It is a shame though, because it would be nice to have a gov. on the ticket.
Pretty ironic, isn't it? Congress has a 9% approval rating and yet both nominees are Senators and Obambi just put one of the biggest Congressional gasbags ever on his ticket.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 24, 2008 09:36 AM (Ed00m)
27
Attu?! Not Attu Hitu? Leave my island alone! You can have Fatu Hiva.
If McPain chooses a lefty, I'm voting for down-ticket conservatives and I'll leave it up to McCain's attorneys to figure out whether my non-vote for president can be construed as a vote for him.
McCain is probably tight with Lanny Davis - he can litigate.
Posted by: Jack in the Woods at August 24, 2008 10:22 AM (zu64Q)
28
The great thing Palin would bring to the ticket is blue collar creds which would certainly match those of a guy who has been a Senator since Moses was a baby. And I love thinking about how bunny hugger heads would explode at the sight of Palin's bear skin rugs and trophy pictures.
Although it's also fun to think of Biden facing Bobby (Does not work in a Dunkin' Donuts) Jindal in a debate.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 24, 2008 10:47 AM (/vvlP)
29
Oh, the humanity . . . :-)
Posted by: Sissy Willis at August 24, 2008 07:39 PM (cdtTx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
And While Democrats Still Wait For A Special Sign from the Obamamessiah...
The rest of the world already knows Barack Obama's running mate is Joe Biden.
It's rather sad, really. Back on August 10, David Plouffe, Barak Obama's Campaign Manager, promised in an email to supporters that they could, "Be the first to know who Barack selects as his running mate."
Obama for America
Dear xxxxxxx --
Be the First to Know Barack Obama is about to make one of the most important decisions of this campaign -- choosing a running mate.
You have helped build this movement from the bottom up, and Barack wants you to be the first to know his choice.
Sign up today to be the first to know:
http://my.barackobama.com/vp
You will receive an email the moment Barack makes his decision, or you can text VP to 62262 to receive a text message on your mobile phone.
Once you've signed up, please forward this email to your friends, family, and coworkers to let them know about this special opportunity.
No other campaign has done this before. You can be part of this important moment.
Be the first to know who Barack selects as his running mate.
Thanks,
David
David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America
But the email and text message quite obviously didn't come to them first as the campaign promised.
If Barackophiles went to
FoxNews.com, or
CNN, or the
NY Times instead of signing up for a silly little text message to be delivered sometime tomorrow morning, they would already know Biden is Obama's pick.
It's got to be disappointing when you discover that the candidate you helped elect into office lied to you. It must be worse to find out he's lying to you, when he hasn't even nailed down the nomination yet.
Disappointment? Buyer's Remorse? Disillusionment?
Check.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:13 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I didn't sign up for it, but apparently it went out around 4 AM EDT. Nothing like being woken up at ass AM Saturday morning to hear important, breaking news that you knew eight hours beforehand.
Posted by: Matt at August 23, 2008 08:11 AM (cXWnh)
2
I didn't sign up for the text message, but I heard it on our NBC affilliate (confirmed by NBC, they said)at midnight Pacific.
Posted by: SouthernRoots at August 23, 2008 08:50 AM (EsOdX)
3
I cruised around the DU for awhile, and many of them were very pissed off about the text message deal.
Seriously, whose bright idea was it to do it this way?
Posted by: William Teach at August 23, 2008 09:06 AM (NaHh8)
4
Wow, I feel soooooooooo betrayed by not getting a timelier text message. Is this all you got?
Posted by: larrys at August 23, 2008 11:42 AM (PMlL4)
5
Just a sign of the incompetence to come.
Posted by: notropis at August 23, 2008 05:54 PM (2wE96)
6
What's so silly about collecting thousands, maybe millions, of e-mail addresses and cell phone numbers from supporters? Is it sour grapes or prideful ignorance?
Posted by: pdiddy at August 23, 2008 08:42 PM (Ge7cP)
7
And this new changey way of doing things turned out to be the same old s**t, larrys. Piddy, there's nothing silly about collecting the info. It's the making a promise and failing to deliver that is problematic.
Me, I think it was marvelous. I don't have a problem with it at all. More, please.
Posted by: Pablo at August 24, 2008 08:54 AM (yTndK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 22, 2008
They're Baaack...
And you
thought it was over...
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:51 PM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
AAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!! I'm telling you, when and if Beauchump shows his a$$ here in Kuwait, I am PERSONALLY go and kick the ever loving hell out of him, even if it costs me my job.
Posted by: Big Country at August 22, 2008 02:01 PM (niydV)
2
Sorry Scott, your 15 minutes is over...
Posted by: Diogenes at August 22, 2008 02:50 PM (2MrBP)
3
I am taking BlackFive's lead on this. He's not worth one more minute of my time.
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at August 22, 2008 03:30 PM (oC8nQ)
4
Apart from the lunatic fringe left, is Spencer Hackerman accorded any credibility? It seems he is joining the Mary Mapes, no one has definitively proven the story not to be true, school of journalism with this tongue bath of Ellspeth and Scott.
Posted by: daleyrocks at August 22, 2008 08:34 PM (i/fLn)
5
A very good column, CY. Kudos.
Posted by: Dusty at August 22, 2008 08:56 PM (8RfU1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 21, 2008
Crazy So Deep It Needs A Lifeguard
So, you thought that the validation of Barack Obama's printed, notarized birth certificate by FactCheck.org would be enough to shut down the Obama Truth MovementTM (OTM)?
Guess again, suckers. A PUMA is
suing to stop Obama's nomination:
In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama's mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, "apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight." As Sen. Obama's own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham--Obama's mother--gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.
Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama's birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals--Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital--in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple "registry of birth" records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.
And just so we're clear here: this latest attempt to disqualify Barack Obama is
fratricide—sniping done by Hillary Clinton supporters loyal to the Democratic Party, and not by Republicans.
Just like the rumors of a Michelle Obama "whitey" tape.
Just like attempts to claim Obama never registered for the Selective Service.
Just like an attempt to claim Obama is a Muslim, and an Indonesian ineligible for executive office, because of what his step-father wrote on a school registration form when he was a child.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:24 PM
| Comments (29)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
That guy merely brings lawsuits for publicity purposes and self aggrandizement.
He is not a PUMA and is not associated with any PUMA organization that I know of.
Just because someone is anti-Obama does not make them a PUMA.
Posted by: Texas Hill Country at August 22, 2008 01:53 AM (y+8fg)
2
btw - that lawyer also tried to block Cheney's VP bid due to residency requirements of some obscure and ancient law requiring the president and the veep be from different states.
it got thrown out because it was dumb... that, and Cheney "lived in" Montana.
Posted by: Texas Hill Country at August 22, 2008 01:56 AM (y+8fg)
3
I don't know whether the lawsuit will go forward or not, nor do I know whether this issue of the birth certificate is valid.
I do know that the issue has been raised multiple times and apparently hasn't been answered sufficiently to put it to bed. Why can't the Obama campaign clear this up?
Posted by: fgmorley at August 22, 2008 05:08 AM (JAGWJ)
4
Wouldn't the airline have a record somewhere showing if Stanley Ann Dunham flew with or without a baby?
Posted by: shunha7878 at August 22, 2008 08:25 AM (/DeBx)
5
fgmorley: "Why can't the Obama campaign clear this up?"
For the same reason that biologists can't "clear up" the questions about evolution, and NIST can't "clear up" the questions about WTC 7, and Bush can't "clear up" the questions about his ANG service, and nobody can "clear up" the questions about the murder of John F. Kennedy:
Some people would rather believe the lie than the truth.
Posted by: wolfwalker at August 22, 2008 09:24 AM (yhTQf)
6
THC - it got thrown out because it was dumb... that, and Cheney "lived in" Montana.
Actually, he lived in and will return to live in Wyoming.
Posted by: Mark at August 22, 2008 09:36 AM (4od5C)
7
The height of the missatributional camouflage probably came with the id of Bob Beckel as a Republican when he was flogging this sort of thing on cable. Hilarious! This crap has a long pedigree, of course. You can still invoke Willy Horton and receive hissing objections from crowds of Lefties. Few remember that it was Al Gore who took this supposedly racist swipe at Dukakis. You can still get the expression of a boated catfish out of your brother in law from that one.
Posted by: megapotamus at August 22, 2008 10:39 AM (LF+qW)
8
Federal case, mmmm, Rule 11 Sanctions
Posted by: Penfold at August 22, 2008 12:06 PM (lF2Kk)
9
Personally, I don't care where the Obamessiah was hatched. I really don't. Personally. Mind you, ANYTHING that prevents that piece of porcine offal from being elected is worth its weight in platinum. Therefore, ANYTHING of that nature is "good for America".
Posted by: cmblake6 at August 22, 2008 01:07 PM (QSVQf)
10
I gotta go make a popcorn run, this is starting to get good.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 22, 2008 03:50 PM (6L459)
11
Interesting. Very interesting....
My question is, why don't you hear about any of this on the mainstream media outlets? Oh, right, probably because he's their golden child and they're forbidden to speak ill of anybody they like.....
Posted by: Ura at August 22, 2008 05:46 PM (cnTh5)
12
The media doesn't report on every crank lawsuit. There's so many of them, they'd be reporting 7x24
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 22, 2008 08:25 PM (6L459)
13
And what is your motive for defending Obama?
If libs want to take pot shots at each other, who the hell are you to step in and show how morally superior you are? Common failing among conservatives. The war is in the trenches, don't think that you get credit from anyone that counts by helping Barak stay clean.
That sort of thinking is why Bush has been such a failure. He sure proved that he was above the fray by letting Sandy Berger off easy, while at the same time letting Scooter Libby fry. He still hasn't gone public to bitch-slap Colin Powell and Richard Armatage. He is staying out of the mud you see. Keeping clean. Being a sucker and an enemy to his own cause.
Don't do it.
Posted by: Smarty at August 23, 2008 01:51 PM (KJgrc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Ad: Ayers Succeeded Where Bin Laden Failed. What Kind of Friends Do You Have There, Barack?
Simple, direct, and to the point.
Ben Smith at the Politico
really disgraces himself by trying to start the meme that the ad tries to smear Obama as a Muslim and Muslims as
de facto terrorists.
Uh, Ben? Bill Ayers—Barack's buddy of more than two decades—is not a Muslim.
Nice try there, Bucket, but you can't carry the water on this one.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
04:34 PM
| Comments (29)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Rest assured that if John McCain knew Timothy McVeigh, the Dems would have no problem describing them as McBirds of a McFeather.
Posted by: Lurking Observer at August 21, 2008 06:07 PM (htSrh)
2
So...McSame must be running scared now, huh?
Posted by: Pockmark Notorious at August 21, 2008 06:40 PM (TWj7U)
3
Yep, absolutely terrified. I know that if I were McCain and all those polls started to turn in my favor day after day and week after week I'd be hiding under my bed.
It's not a good time to be a leftie, is it? Has the panic started to set in? Have you started writing down excuses for when Obama loses so that you can get out in front of it and explain away how, in a year everything was going in Dems' favor, they still couldn't pull it out?
Posted by: ECM at August 21, 2008 06:47 PM (q3V+C)
4
McCain will need more of this to win, and he should be ruthless. Obama will be, yes he will.
Posted by: m at August 21, 2008 07:54 PM (k+clE)
5
Take a look at McCain's new web ad - it's hilarious (or infuriating, if you're an Obamabot.) Manages to make not only Obama, but Pelosi, Kaine and The One's fervent disciples all look ridiculous:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/08/mccain_the_one_road_to_denver.html
The Ayers and Rezko ads are excellent, but this one will really get under their skin. Laughing at the Messiah? How dare we?
Posted by: Donna V. at August 21, 2008 09:27 PM (s2bSr)
6
I like all three ads. I'm just really glad that the Ayres thing isn't just going away. That man should be behind bars. He's not "respectable" he's horrible. Terrorizing a country like the United States... where would Ayres, the spoiled brat like to live? I'd really hate to see that place.
I wish that they could make a bigger deal out of this:
http://cancelthebee.blogspot.com/2008/05/obamas-shady-teamsters-deal.html
I mean, it was in the WSJ, and it's pretty cynical and ugly. Call off the Federal oversite of the mob ties to the Unions? And he considers himself to be pro Union? So I guess with Obama in the oval office, you can expece organized crime to regain a lot of the ground that it lost under Regan?
I hope not.
Posted by: xerocky at August 22, 2008 05:28 AM (kX5hh)
7
When does this hit prime time TV? Not everyone has YouTube. Everyone watches the idiot box.
Posted by: cmblake6 at August 22, 2008 01:20 PM (QSVQf)
8
"When does this hit prime time TV?"
When you can watch it on the big screen in the lodge of the Satan Ski Resort....
Posted by: SDN at August 22, 2008 04:51 PM (F2ojY)
9
Have our politics dropped so low that a man who sought out the mentorship of terrorists and communists can actually be nominated as a presidential candidate? How anyone can be a dhimmierat is beyond me. As for Politico they have abandoned any pretense of being a serious blog a long time ago.
Posted by: Thomas Jackson at August 23, 2008 03:23 PM (LHaZf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Death of a Breastman?
University of Iowa political science professor Arthur Miller, accused of trying to trade amateur mammography for grades, has gone armed and missing:
Officers are walking Hickory Hill Park, a 185-acre wooded park in northeast Iowa City, through the rain to see if they can find Arthur Miller, a 66-year-old political science professor who was last heard from Tuesday morning.
Police believe Miller has a high-powered rifle and intends to harm himself. There is no evidence he wants to harm others, police said, but the park is still closed and nearby residents have been warned not to linger in their yards.
Miller's cell phone, wallet and ammunition were found in his car, located outside the park Wednesday morning.
It sounds like the authorities expect a suicide, which, considering the public embarrassment and potential of a lengthy prison sentence, isn't all that surprising.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:47 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I hope this turns out better than it sounds like it will, particularly since most people who intend to do only themselves harm don't pick out a high-powered rifle as the weapon of choice.
Posted by: tbrosz at August 21, 2008 09:21 PM (2DKKk)
2
Well, that may be the only weapon he has access to. But I'd hate to walk up on a suicidal pervert with a rifle. They might just decide that now's a good time to become homicidal as well.
Posted by: XBradTC at August 22, 2008 11:04 AM (pSXbN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Charming! Obama's Only Executive Role A Disaster
Anyone the least bit familiar with Barack Obama's rise to power knows "hope" and "change" are just words; he's built his career the old-fashioned way, by making powerful allies and casting those no longer useful to him aside.
It is those same business-as-usual allies in Chicago that are now protecting Obama from deeper scrutiny of his 21-year relationship with the Ayers family, specifically his involvement in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge with infamous domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.
At the moment the internal documents for the Chicago Annenberg Challenge are in a special collection at the Richard J. Daley Library. Think they'll ever see the light of day?
As the Chicago Tribune's John Kass
put it:
The relationship between the ambitious Obama and the unrepentant Ayers is a subject that excites Republicans, who haven't really thwacked that pinata as hard as they might. It really irritates Obama and his political champion, Chicago's sovereign lord, Mayor Richard M. Daley.
"This is a public entity," Kurtz told us Wednesday. "I don't understand how confidentiality of the donor would be an issue."
You don't understand, Mr. Kurtz? Allow me to explain. The secret is hidden in the name of the library:
The Richard J. Daley Library.
Eureka!
The Richard J. Daley Library doesn't want nobody nobody sent. And Richard J.'s son, Shortshanks, is now the mayor.
Kurtz can forget about getting his hands on those documents in any useful form, and the only way they'll come to light before November is if the mainstream media starts to get irate that Obama is
abusing their love for him one again. Even if that were to happen, odds are that any documents released would be "sanitized" to remove embarrassing or incriminating information. The Chicago political machine, if anything, is a wood chipper.
Not all the Chicago Annenberg Challenge documents were buried, however. At least until a few
managed to slip out before the door was slammed. Those documents that have been uncovered seem to indicate Barack Obama was a spectacularly incompetent chairman, blowing through tens of millions of dollars of grant money with
little or nothing to show for it.
Well, that's not
entirely true.
At least $175,000 was funneled to Ayers friend, SDS radical, Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) (CPML) chairman and Barack Obama supporter Mike Klonsky's Small School Workshop. For a man who gripes about corporate handouts, it seems quite possible that Obama and Ayers may have used Annenberg Foundation grants as a form of welfare for radicals.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:53 AM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Ayers and Obama in their CAC career were able to hand out over $100,000,000 in disbursements. Ostensibly these were to improve learning performance in schoolchildren, although the bottom line report at the end of the campaign showed no such improvement.
So what were they up to, exactly? Certainly political organization and agitation, in opposition to the elected Chicago School Board's administration. But a reading of their organizational goals leaves the reader gasping in admiration for the glib verbose clouds of meanlingless drivel and wafty considerations - as if the language deliberately concealed the smallest hint of specific actions the CAC shelled out to support.
We are therefore left to wonder, who benefited? Certainly not the schoolchildren. Nor the elected school board, which was forced to spend significant resources in political defenses against the enormous Obama-Ayers war chest.
Most likely, the beneficiaries were Obama and Ayers themselves, in that those mighty resources enabled them to organize and maintain a very large political network, useful to them in fields far beyond education. One pinpoint view is that of Ayers's endowment of the Maoist Klonsky - and how many other radicals buried within local groups?
I would conclude that Obama's proposal for a Federal do-gooder corps, funded in parity with the US military, is his logical next step after his pilot project with the CAC. If a hundred million organized the radicals well enough to float Obama's political career, think how such Federal resources might be used as a slush fund to endow hundreds of thousands of 'activists' in overwhelming the democratic process in every urban center of the country. Hint: they wouldn't be Republicans.
Posted by: Micropotamus at August 21, 2008 11:41 AM (fuC1N)
2
Why would an unrepentent terrorist get involved with education - Look to the November 7, 206 blog entry on
">Bill Ayer's Web Site
"This is my fourth visit to Venezuela, each time at the invitation of my comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring fighter for justice. Luis has taught me a great deal about the Bolivarian Revolution and about the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution, and I’ve come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both the Venezuelan and the international struggle---I look forward to seeing how he and all of you continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane. Thank you, Luis, for everything you’ve done."
Posted by: davod at August 21, 2008 12:15 PM (llh3A)
3
The above link should be billayers.blogspot.com
Posted by: davod at August 21, 2008 12:19 PM (llh3A)
4
Amy Ridenour unravels some of the strings Ayers and Daley are apparently pulling:
http://www.nationalcenter.org/2008/08/chicago-annenberg-challenge-mysterious.html
Ayers may be pulling strings behind the scenes but he likely doesn't own the records. The real owner needs to be uncovered, dragged out into the light of day, and put on the hot seat in public view.
Gaining access to the truth before the Demo convention is unlikely, but forcing the issue on to the national stage could still be very problematic for Obama and terrorist Ayers.
Posted by: novaculus at August 21, 2008 12:39 PM (R3kjH)
5
Steve Diamond at Global Labor and Politics has uncovered a trove of crucial CAC documents:
http://globallabor.blogspot.com/2008/08/behind-annenberg-gate-inside-chicago.html
Conclusion: Obama is lying about the nature and extent of his relationship and cooperation with the unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. And what they are hiding may be much, much more than just the fact of their cozy political alliance and personal friendship of 20 years. They may be trying to hide the diversion of millions of dollars of charitable funds intended to benefit city students into the coffers of political activists.
Posted by: novaculus at August 21, 2008 12:46 PM (R3kjH)
6
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 08/21/2008 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.
Posted by: David M at August 21, 2008 02:19 PM (gIAM9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obama's Twisted Argument for Infanticide
I heard an audio clip purporting to be Barack Obama's argument again the Born Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA) last night, but wasn't 100% sure that the audio is Obama.
Ed Morrissey notes that
Guy Benson was able to dig up the
Illinois legislature transcripts featuring Obama's arguments against BAIPA, and then Ed proceeds to
take Obama's convoluted arguments for infanticide apart.
This passage is really remarkable for the willfully obtuse nature of Obama's arguments. By the time this debate took place, Jill Stanek had already revealed that doctors weren't providing medical care to infants born alive during abortions, at Christ Hospital, and a subsequent investigation proved that other abortion providers also abandoned such infants to die. That was the entire reason for the debate. Obama acts as if this is some curious academic hypothesis.
Instead of addressing the actual issue of infanticide, Obama twists it into a protection for abortion. He frames his own hypothetical as an abortion "for the health of the mother", but the circumstances of the mother's health has no bearing at all on whether a live infant should receive medical care. How would treating a live infant threaten the health of the mother?
Obviously, there is no physical connection between the care of the live baby and that of the mother once the baby has been born. This seems to leave us with just two options.
(1). Either Barack Obama is such a rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth left wing ideologue that he blinded himself to the fact that the Born Alive Infant Protection Act was not about the abortion rights of the mother, but the right to life-saving medical care for the living human baby, or;
(2). He was well aware of what the bill was about, and coldly chose for infanticide, not once, not twice, but on three separate votes for reasons he either cannot explain or will not explain to avoid being viewed as a monster.
As a man who coldly stated that he would see his
own grandchild aborted because he wouldn't want his daughters "punished with a baby" as the result of an unplanned pregnancy, anything is possible.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:13 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Jill Stanek could make a hell of a campaign ad. I read some months ago that she personally lobbied Obama with stories of her experience with babies born alive who were left to die. Her comment was that Obama was "unmoved" by her first-hand, gut wrenching observations.
Posted by: capitano at August 21, 2008 09:26 AM (UsyG7)
2
I think the Obamasiah is the best campaigner that McCain has got. Every time he opens his mouth, he stuffs a foot in it. Reagan said "Liberals know so much that is wrong". Libs try to come off as so lovingly humanistic but their actions would give Atilla the Hun nightmares. Hillary gives me nightmares, and I'm afraid she ain't done with this run at the presidency yet. In fact, I'm a bit suprised that Obamalamadingding is even still alive. I guess she's being careful.
Posted by: Tonto (USA) at August 21, 2008 09:36 AM (Qv1xF)
3
I've linked to your post from Obama History on Abortion and Infanticide
Posted by: Wayne at August 21, 2008 02:53 PM (th2Pz)
4
History shows that leaders who will not admit mistakes and cling to distorted values never end well. The only question Americans should ask themselves is a combination of a man who sees himself as God (remember his parting the waters) and is incapable of errors of judgement makes for good leadership. Apparently the Germans thought so and this may explain their reception of the Dalibama. Whether Americans will support such a candidate reamins to be seen.
Posted by: Thomas Jackson at August 23, 2008 08:20 PM (LHaZf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"We Were Soldiers" CMoH Hero Pilot Passes
Ed Freeman, a helicopter pilot that flew fourteen missions into a hot landing zone to re-supply the 7th Cavalry and evacuate wounded soldiers in the Ia Drang Valley, has died at 80.
Check out
Argghhh! for more.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:26 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Truly, may he rest in peace.
Posted by: Big Country at August 21, 2008 04:05 PM (niydV)
2
Great movie, "We Were Soldiers" I watch that one now and then on DVD, and it always makes me feel proud of the USA and our servicemen and women.
RIP Ed Freeman. A grateful nation bids you farewell.
Posted by: Barry at August 21, 2008 09:56 PM (KOkrW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 113 >>
Processing 0.05, elapsed 1.3609 seconds.
37 queries taking 1.3335 seconds, 213 records returned.
Page size 162 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.