Oh, the Gaffes We'll Have...

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 06:15 AM
Comments
Posted by: Jack at August 23, 2008 07:19 AM (Ss83y)
Posted by: McGehee at August 23, 2008 07:54 AM (K13Au)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at August 23, 2008 08:38 AM (wUvEV)
Sorry, McBush: the presidency is not a Good Conduct Medal to be awarded for meritorious service half a century ago.
Posted by: larrys at August 23, 2008 11:40 AM (PMlL4)
larrys:
that's it? Can't you say anything positive about either man at the head of the Dem ticket? wow, that is sad.
Posted by: iconoclast at August 23, 2008 11:46 AM (TzLpv)
Now we only have to worry about McCain's choice. Picking Lieberman would be a bad, bad mistake.
The two best choices, in my opinion, are Romney and Palin. And they both have Achilles heels.
Romney - I'm not so worried about the Mormon business. The evangelical I'll-never-vote-for-a -Mormon crowd mainly live in solidly red states. I don't think there are enough of them to flip those states to the Dems.
No, what troubles me is that a McCain/Romney ticket will be painted as Rich and Richer by the Dems, who will play the class warfare card for all it's worth this year to deflect the charge of elitism. From that POV, Biden was a smart choice, because Obama needs to shore up his blue collar creds. When the economy is good, class warfare is a hard sell. Successful businessmen are admired. However, it's a different story when Americans are worried about gas prices, inflation, the housing market, etc. Biden may have a F rating from the NRA but those bitter, gun-toting, bible thumpers might look at a McCain/Romney ticket and think, "Do these guys know what it's like to worry about mortgage payments?"
Palin - She'd certainly spice up the ticket. I like everything I've heard about Palin and was initially very enthusiatic about her. But she's not yet ready for prime time. McCain is 71, that makes his VP choice even more crucial than Obama's. As much as I love the idea of a pro-life, tax-cutting conservative VP who also is pretty and hunts, I can't see her dealing wtih Russia or Iran at this point. Not because Palin is female, but because she just ain't ready.
Both would be better than Lieberman or Huckabee or Ridge. But I'm not breaking out the champagne yet.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 12:04 PM (oWE80)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 12:14 PM (oWE80)
Posted by: Chuck at August 23, 2008 01:53 PM (EaKto)
Posted by: Blutarsky at August 23, 2008 02:03 PM (JTGrM)
I call the light weight tag team just announced
"Dumbling and Bumbling"
Can you imagine in a crisis "Get Joe on the phone,
Joe, Barack what the hell do we do now?!"
Very scary if these two braniacs were to win.
note for larry's-It appears that you suffer from early onset of lib victim dementia if you are blind to the lack of any substance to Barack!
Posted by: dadinseattle at August 23, 2008 02:14 PM (bEzLC)
A community organizer with no experience and another senator that has never done a thing except to blow hot air running for the highest office and most powerful position on earth blows my mind! The libs / demorats have lost their collective minds.
Posted by: Ted at August 23, 2008 02:18 PM (N3N6D)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 02:26 PM (4dC3f)
I can't see her dealing with Russia or Iran at this point. Not because Palin is female, but because she just ain't ready.
Palin grew up in, and was elected to office (repeatedly) in what is one of the most testosterone-drenched states in the USofA. I'm sure she's had plenty of experience dealing with alpha males. She's certainly bright enough to gain command of the issues involved, so I wouldn't expect Vlad and Mahmoud to be much of a problem for a woman who won the votes and respect of oil-field workers!
McCain / Palin 08!
Palin Bio: http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php
Posted by: InfoGeek at August 23, 2008 02:30 PM (DQi6r)
Posted by: Jenna at August 23, 2008 04:22 PM (Bf0yG)
Posted by: LH at August 23, 2008 05:41 PM (nR4bJ)
Posted by: Rick at August 23, 2008 06:35 PM (tJ+Rw)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 07:02 PM (DLOdQ)
Posted by: Donna V. at August 23, 2008 07:11 PM (DLOdQ)
Dear, oh dear.
Posted by: Mike at August 23, 2008 07:50 PM (7XwxY)
So does this mean that he, The Obamamessiah Himself, (PBUH) ISN'T really ready to be the prez? Sounds like a freudian slip if you ask me...
Posted by: Big Country at August 23, 2008 08:15 PM (KYpRJ)
Posted by: Smokin' at August 23, 2008 09:21 PM (qf/a6)
Posted by: Bering Strait at August 23, 2008 09:51 PM (UkEiT)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 23, 2008 11:19 PM (6L459)
Posted by: Gary Rosen at August 24, 2008 04:51 AM (sHuCu)
It ain't a Rookie of the Year award either.
Posted by: Gary Rosen at August 24, 2008 04:53 AM (sHuCu)
It is a shame though, because it would be nice to have a gov. on the ticket.
Pretty ironic, isn't it? Congress has a 9% approval rating and yet both nominees are Senators and Obambi just put one of the biggest Congressional gasbags ever on his ticket.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 24, 2008 09:36 AM (Ed00m)
If McPain chooses a lefty, I'm voting for down-ticket conservatives and I'll leave it up to McCain's attorneys to figure out whether my non-vote for president can be construed as a vote for him.
McCain is probably tight with Lanny Davis - he can litigate.
Posted by: Jack in the Woods at August 24, 2008 10:22 AM (zu64Q)
Although it's also fun to think of Biden facing Bobby (Does not work in a Dunkin' Donuts) Jindal in a debate.
Posted by: Donna V. at August 24, 2008 10:47 AM (/vvlP)
Posted by: Sissy Willis at August 24, 2008 07:39 PM (cdtTx)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0191 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0141 seconds, 37 records returned.
Page size 16 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.