Ogre's Politics & Views
January 11, 2006
Freedom
Know what I like best about the internet? It's the only place where there's still quite a bit of freedom. For example, if I post here on the internet that "She's a pretty woman," I'm pretty much ok.
If I were to say the same thing at a place of employment, I would
probably be fired, and would likely be sued.
If I said the same thing at a public University that I paid for, I would
likely be expelled.
And the idea that I can say things on the internet and not be punished for incorrect thought REALLY bothers
some people.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:26 PM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Then you must really be bummed about the law Bush just signed making it a federal crime to troll or annoy people on the internet, unless one is using one's full, real name?
Posted by: Stacy at January 11, 2006 11:47 PM (Bq6D0)
2
Hey, you just annoyed me -- is your REAL name Stacey?
(Yup, that's the law that spurred this post -- linked to in the last sentence of the post).
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 12:56 AM (+Gl1m)
3
So does what can I get from all those liberal blogs that annoy me? It annoys me that they exist even if I don't go to their sites, LOL!!!
Posted by: Deb at January 12, 2006 02:09 AM (jkWU6)
4
I've said it before and I'll say it again -- the self appointed PC Police are trying to turn us into the mirror image of the future society in the Stallone/Snipes film, "Demolition Man".
Posted by: Seth at January 12, 2006 03:43 AM (Gy7db)
5
I'm not sure what bothers me most about this - thinking about what the government is going to have to do in order to enforce this law, wondering why, if the government can enforce this law now, why they haven't put an end to spamming, or just the idea that a conservative, republican government signed off on this travesty.
Posted by: The Small Town Hick at January 12, 2006 04:55 AM (ZINSp)
6
Wow, you've definitely lost it.
Posted by: Joe Bloggs at January 12, 2006 05:18 AM (rYOFh)
7
Ack!
I think people are so hypersensitive these days. The guys and I at work are not all uptight like the rest of America. I'm always hugging on them and them on me. Nobody thinks twice. Nobody has an agenda, nobody feels threatened, nobody is trying to get one over on someone else.
But... I don't think that's normal in America either...
Posted by: Bou at January 12, 2006 12:06 PM (iHxT3)
8
That's true, Seth, the Demolition Man land is coming true. I'm taking Stallone's role.
Good point, SmallTown Hick -- there's almost no way to actually enforce this law. But in today's government world, that's no reason to not pass a law.
And Joe? It's a good thing I've lost it -- I can't crush my brain enough to fit in today's world.
I'm not sure, Bou, how normal that is. I have a feeling that it's VERY normal -- but the media and others with an agenda absolutely will NOT allow that to be known!
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 12:15 PM (/k+l4)
9
Two things:
1) Is it killing you that you and the ACLU are on the same side for this one? Is it, be honest... you know it is!
2) There is a lot of misunderstandings about this law, even by the article you linked. Michelle of Letters from NYC has a good article on it here: http://lettersfromnyc.mu.nu/archives/150857.php that explains some of the misconceptions.
Posted by: Contagion at January 12, 2006 01:40 PM (Q5WxB)
10
The ACLU is on the right side of something? I seriously doubt it...
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 02:07 PM (/k+l4)
11
So, Ogre, I guess you and I have to see who can "demolish" the most stuff in the least amount of time, because I'm also calling the role of John Spartan, as long as I get the guns too. I am, however, going to re-cast my "partner" from Sandra Bullock to either Angelina Jolie or Alyssa Mylano.
BTW - Can I start SUING THE HELL out of sites that "annoy" me, citing this law, and pressing for "pain and suffering" damages. Might just pay for my school, right?
Posted by: Smokey at January 12, 2006 10:16 PM (K7uqT)
12
Nah, the law is actually more specific, citing "intent to harass," but, well...hey, can *I* be your partner?

Posted by: Ogre at January 13, 2006 11:00 AM (+Gl1m)
13
"the ACLU is on the right side of something...I seriously doubt it."
They are also representing Rush Limbaugh in an effort to prevent the govt from getting his medical records. Surprised?
Oh and yes, my real name is Stacy so even though I annoy you, I am not breaking the law

Posted by: stacy at January 17, 2006 11:36 PM (4RpL0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Never-Ending Flight
I know it's not a funny story, but the tagline for it is just silly:
Flying from Tennessee to Florida, aircraft carrying four aviators never lands;
Uh...what? So the plane is still flying?
But to the families of those missing aviators, my prayers certainly will include you.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:34 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
They changed it for you ogre. Now it talks about a missing jet.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 12, 2006 02:26 AM (SlODe)
2
I don't like to fly, as I've blogged. My Dad, who was a pilot, always said, "Look, we've not left one up there yet." My response was, "Yeah, but I don't necessarily like how they come down at times..." Gravity sometimes really does suck.
Posted by: Bou at January 12, 2006 12:08 PM (iHxT3)
3
And sadly, they've found the wreckage with no survivors. Four more killed while sacrificing their lives for America.
And yes, Bou, the flying is EASY...it's the landing that's tough.
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 12:18 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Federal Water Police
In case you didn't know about it, the federal government is watching your shower. No, it's not the Patriot Act, it's the water police. As Jeffrey Tucker so eloquently outlines, the federal government actually spends time and money monitoring the amount of water you use at one time.
No, there's no restrictions on how much water you can BUY, just how much you can USE at a given moment. In this article, it's the water flow through your shower head. I'm sure many of my readers know how little water you can get through today's newer shower heads.
Mr. Tucker suggests as an academic exercise removing the restrictor plate in the shower nozzle. There's no word on when the government will start searching through your trash to arrest you for having a shower head with too high a flow.
What I really loved about his article is the way American ingenuity took over -- since the regulations were per shower head, a company came up with a
3-headed shower head! Awesome.
So the federal government is going to investigate them. Yes, they could be forced at gunpoint to pay a fine for creating a water head that allows too much water through it. Who said government isn't too big and useless?
And yes, your toilet has that problem too -- that's why it clogs up all the time. I had a post somewhere about how to overclock a toilet, but I can't find it anywhere...but what I really want to know is why are businesses allowed to have toilets with just gallons and gallons of water, but lowly
peons are not?
(H/T to
Michelle Malkin).
Posted by: Ogre at
02:50 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I've long since cured any problems I have with low-flow shower heads. Years ago, i purchased an ultra-low flow shower head. It's approximately 1.5 inch wide and 3-4 inches long, and can be purchased for a few dollars in most Wal-Marts or hardware stores.
This baby does 1.5 gallons per minute, never runs the water heater out of hot water, and puts a scouring shower across my back that takes a few showers to get used to. Most people, upon first use, would describe the sensation as painful. It isn't pain, but it's much stronger than normal shower heads can spray.
http://www.neatitems.com/images/Jet_Shower_Heads_-_chrome_and_polished_brass.jpg
This appears to be a 2.5gpm version of the same head. Good stuff.
Posted by: Lockjaw the Ogre at January 11, 2006 04:34 PM (mAhn3)
2
"but what I really want to know is why are businesses allowed to have toilets with just gallons and gallons of water, but lowly peons are not?"
That's an easy one Ogre. We only need a small amount of water for our crap to reach the street sewer line or septic tank, but it takes much more water in order for the corporate crap to reach Washington.
This is the second time I posted this comment. The first one seemed to have gotten lost in vapor lock, if it shows up, delete it. Thanks
Posted by: Tomslick at January 11, 2006 06:35 PM (xNjHI)
3
But Lockjaw, I don't want pressure, I want VOLUME. I want tons of water just covering me. I want all the water that pipe can bring out of the ground!
ANd Tomslick, I hadn't really thought about it that way...

Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 07:57 PM (/k+l4)
4
Shower head problems... make your own.
Posted by: Contagion at January 11, 2006 09:06 PM (Q5WxB)
5
Oh lordy... what's next? How much air we breath?
Posted by: vw bug at January 11, 2006 10:21 PM (4oOot)
6
VW, are you using more than your share?
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 11:04 PM (+Gl1m)
7
It's funny, my Dad and I were just discussing these low flow water toilets when he was in town. I have an awful time in this house with our commodes clogging (as you and I were discussing once). He said that people are constantly scouring old homes for their high water capacity commodes. I had no idea that you just couldn't 'buy' a high water commode. I'm so bummed.
Posted by: Bou at January 12, 2006 12:11 PM (iHxT3)
8
I'm searching now, as I've gotten some tips recently. It's completely illegal, but the word is that you can get high-flow toilets in Canada and bring them down here. They're expensive, especially the shipping, but I'm headed up near Canada this summer, so I'm going to see if I can hop the border and grab a couple. Maybe I'll put them on eBay and see what I can get for them...
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 12:20 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Education Money Silliness
The left is sure weird when looked at through a lens of reality and logic.
I don't know about where you live, but in Mecklenburg County, NC, every single year the government-run monopolistic education system ("public" education) "needs" more money. The school board asks for, and liberals (including the Charlotte Observer) demand more money.
And when they get their 25-50% increases in spending, all is good because the left can then spend money better than you know how -- on administrators and other non-education related things in the school budgets.
However, when it comes to higher education, where customers (the students) actually have to pay for their own education, suddenly
it costs too much and tuition should be paid
on a sliding scale (the rich pay more), AND prices should actually be CAPPED!
Now why is it that when the government is paying for education, it's simply not possible for it to cost too much, but when individuals have to pay, no matter what the actual cost, they shouldn't have to pay anything?
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Ogre, buddy... we've gone over this. It's because the new American mentallity is something for nothing. When the government is paying, people don't see it as they are paying, even if it comes out of their taxes.
Posted by: Contagion at January 11, 2006 01:44 PM (Q5WxB)
2
No matter how many times I see it, I'm still just amazed at the ability of the left to completely and utterly defy any sense of logic.
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 02:04 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Minimum Wage in NC
The Democrat Treasurer of North Carolina wants to make goods more expensive in North Carolina. Why? Because he may be running for governor in 2008 and wants to attract some support. Oh, why does HE claim?
"the labor market improves for low-income workers. This is because businesses actually start to do better when consumers have more money in their pockets."
So, in his mind, if we force businesses to pay more to make products, people will have more money to spend on the more expensive products.
Yes, he IS a Democrat.
Minimum wage laws
might have been needed at one time. They are NOT needed today. Do you really think that if $2.00 an hour were offered for working at McDonald's that anyone would accept the job?
And if you are one of those who support a minimum wage, do you also support a maximum wage? If not, that doesn't make sense. If you do, what should the maximum wage be? And why only $6.15 for a minimum wage, as Mr. Moore wants? Why not $10 an hour? Why is $6.15 better than $10?
Minimum wage laws are socialist crap, no matter how you slice them. They are wrong and violently interfere with the free market. Their only real effect is to raise the prices for EVERYONE on EVERYTHING.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:05 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Increase minimum wage = increase in the cost of doing business = increase in the cost of products or services.
So the people making minimum wage aren't better off, and those that make over minimum wage will basically take a cost of living decrease. Unless their company gives them a cost of living increase in pay, which mine doesn't.
Posted by: Contagion at January 11, 2006 01:47 PM (Q5WxB)
2
And this is just a new wrinkle on the socialists who support min wage increases. They've taken your obvious logic and just added one more step:
= people have more money to BUY those higher priced products and services.
And somehow that's seen as a good thing.
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 02:06 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 10, 2006
It Worked in CA...
Well, one Democrat governor got removed from office recently for misconduct -- will another?
Monday afternoon, Kat Landry, founder of the website RECALLGOVERNORBLANCO.COM announced her intentions to file a recall petition for the office of the governor.
Who knows where this one will go?
(H/T to
Louisiana Libertarian.)
Posted by: Ogre at
07:01 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: birdwoman at January 10, 2006 10:56 PM (vR7Sl)
2
Nobody thought it would happen in CA, either...
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 01:04 AM (s2+Ck)
3
Honestly, I don't know if this recall will accomplish anything. All that will happen is the Lt. Governor will serve out the remander of her term and he is as incompetant and corrupt as she is.
Posted by: Kevin at January 15, 2006 04:18 AM (0ozWZ)
4
True. I don't know that there's any politicians in LA that aren't. Perhaps the Daly family could take over...
Posted by: Ogre at January 15, 2006 02:01 PM (+Gl1m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Planned Parenthood is Criminal
Planned Parenthood, the euphemism for killing babies, is on record this past year as being complicit in at least 290 cases of criminal activity in IL. I'm not holding my breath for the prosecutions, however.
As
Part-Time Pundit outlines, Planned Parenthood is making large amounts of cash by hiding crimes from the police. The crime? Rape. That's correct, Planned Parenthood of IL knows details about 290 cases of criminal rape, but they won't report them because they're more interested in earning cash.
Don't believe me? Their own website
shows it! A girl is raped at age 11 and tells Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood conceals that rape from the authorities so they can get cash from the girl.
Go ahead, try and convince me they're doing good by enabling rapists. Oh, but
there's people who actually SUPPORT this continuing action:
Your attempt to slander Planned Parenthood as an organization involved in child rape may be accepted by your fellow neo-whatevers, but its hardly credible for most of the rest of us.
So, despite current, active evidence that clearly shows that PP supports child rapists, some simply choose to absolutely not see the truth. Ignoring facts does not make you right or good.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:05 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Were you to have sex, you might worry that offspring might follow. And bringing up baby in BushWorld is not the wisest course. Better to abort than to keep populating this shithole world with more and more packrats and ne'er-do-wells, who clearly deserve much better.
As a male, I am relieved that the onus is not on us. What is on us is the anus, and the anus cannot reproduce. At least not effectively. And because of this, we do not have to ever worry about being saddled with an unwanted child. For a female, this is not so easy. They don't like rubbers either.
Granted, it sounds slack to make such comments, but alas, many people are slack.
If, during a war written about in a bible, a general says to "lay them all waste", we should not take that to mean that all people should lay all people to waste for all time. The same can be said for "Be fruitful and multiply."
If it were written today, it would say "Enough already!"
No one likes the act of abortion, but most are glad it is an option. Face it. Life is not as magical and santa claus as we are told. Everyone dies. No big deal. Go war. The great aborter.
Anyway...howdy! Happy Newish Year.
Posted by: anonymoses at January 10, 2006 08:27 PM (ELJo9)
2
This post isn't about supporting or opposing abortion -- it's about an organization that is committing a clear crime for profit, but no one seems to care about it.
Is it ok if *I* commit a crime if it's for profit?
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 10:45 PM (s2+Ck)
3
Sorry...I had to read and write too fast.
If PP is acting in an untoward and profiteering manner, certainly expose them, and bring them to justice. I don't know about you, but I'd love it if decent, honest, and charitable souls would rise, and that mediocre, greedy lying types would just go away...regardless of political persuasion.
I suspect there is a structural flaw in the financial system which causes people to at least feel like they need more and more...and after a while crime becomes necessary to achieve it. A carrot chase. Beneath ogres and nonnies.
Best to ya!
Dave
Posted by: anonymoses at January 10, 2006 11:03 PM (e9XHy)
4
This is a old issue. PP has been doing this for sometime and has been under investigation for covering up rapes before. In one case the refused to give age and payment information from their files to police investigating rapes.
You notice how abortion providers talk about "a woman’s right" until they are blue in the face but the strongest supporters of abortion are men.
This is disgusting and I have not tolerance for it. Nothing is more abusive to a girl than to be raped and to have the rapist force you into an abortion to cover up his crime.
These people are the antitheist of women’s rights.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 10, 2006 11:42 PM (SlODe)
5
Good for you for bringing it to the light. How can anyone defend that "company's" behavior?
Posted by: Monika at January 11, 2006 12:35 AM (bmWjK)
6
I don't really have an oppinion on this at this time. I don't know enough about Plan Parenthood to be able to make an informed decision and I don't have the time to do the research right now. All I can say is that if it is related to medical treatment, NOW they may be legally obligated NOT to give details about their patients.
Posted by: Contagion at January 11, 2006 12:40 AM (e8b4J)
7
Indeed, Dave, the carrot chase it out of control!
Mindflame, yes, it's an old issue, but PP keeps breaking the law, and no one cares.
And Contagion -- have I not provided enough information? If an 11 year old shows up anywhere, claiming to be pregnant, that's a crime. That's rape in any state. To not report a known felony is a crime as well, medical treatment or not.
This would be the same as a doctor who treated a bank robber who was shot and didn't report the gunshot wound.
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 01:07 AM (s2+Ck)
8
Ogre, unfortunately laws differ from state to state. In Illinois, where I live and have a law degree, it is not illegal to not report a rape. The medical profession has to follow the patients wishes. It's up to the victims to file a police report. Even if the police know that a rape has occured AND whom the victim is, if the victim doesn't want to file charges owell.
Now we have the manner of an 11 year old. This changes some of the laws. That is where I would have to do some research, as well as is Plan Parenthood actually providing medical treatment or are they just helping pay for it.
Posted by: Contagion at January 11, 2006 01:51 PM (Q5WxB)
9
I'm pretty sure (not being in IL I'm not positive), that what you describe is exactly correct -- for adults. I'm almost sure it's a crime in IL to not report a felony when a minor is the victim.
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 02:08 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Advertiser
Yes folks, time once again to introduce a new advertiser here at Ogre's Politics and Views. This week, Organized Chaos has seen the wisdom of placing an advertisement here at Ogre's -- now don't let her down, click on the link and go read. And if you want to check back later in the week, the small square over there in the left column will be there all week.
Lisa, the author there is...(deep breath)
a conservative republican with some libertarian tendencies,a sports fan(baseball/college basketball and football), web geek, XM subscriber, talk radio addict, college grad, and a fan of snow (the white, fluffy stuff and the guy who works at FNC). And I think guys in bow ties rule (love ya tucker!).
Whew.
But there is some really good reading over there. There's
a post with henry david thoreau quotes -- that are just excellent. She also talks about the brewing
Abramoff scandal that shows it's NOT about campaign finance reform -- it's about scummy people.
There's lots more good stuff over there, so head on over and read a little, especially if you like politics -- you might find yourself a new daily read!
Oh, and if you're interested in adding your own ad here, to get that top box, you need a
free BlogExplosion account...or you can
buy a BlogAd (they're cheap!).
Posted by: Ogre at
03:01 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
If I had known you were going to post my whole profile, I would have made a bit shorter...lol. Thanks for the review.

Posted by: Lisa at January 11, 2006 12:11 AM (kDqEb)
2
I thought that profile was great! It just went on and on and on...

Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 01:07 AM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Eddie Goodall on the Lottery Lawsuit
In case you're wondering why a group of people would sue the state for illegally passing a lottery, Eddie Goodall, Senator from Union county, outlines his case. He describes exactly why and how the lottery passed, and what's wrong with it.
First let me tell you what our purpose isn't. There is nothing in the 23 pages of the complaint and petition that says anything negative (or positive) about a lottery. The lawsuit has nothing to do with the value of a state lottery.
It has everything to do with something far more fundamental to our citizens: adherence to the law.
This lawsuit is about asking the courts to force the Democrat-run state legislature to follow the Constitution. In fact, the more I look at the facts of this case, if the judges do not rule against the legislature, then the North Carolina Constitution seriously becomes just an advisory document that the Democrats are free to ignore.
The Constitution is very clear. The Democrats violated it. If this is left stand, there is no Constitution in North Carolina, except when the Democrats want there to be one.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:09 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Eminent Domain - NC
Get ready to lose more property rights in North Carolina. A committee is meeting to discuss eminent domain. Here's some anti-freedom quotes:
I don't think there's a single person here that wants to disrupt progress with our governments.
-Wilma Sherrill, R-Buncombe
Nope, there isn't. Only because you don't have anyone at your meeting that believes there is such a thing as property rights, apparently. Government and progress in the same sentence just don't go together.
We want to be sure that whatever we do ... that we don't take away the good things that can now be accomplished in North Carolina
Lucy Allen, D-Franklin
Left off of that sentence was the implied, "at the expense of individuals and liberty." Government isn't doing good things when they steal from individuals. These people meeting clearly hate property rights and believe that government is the end-all be-all determiner of the use of all land in the state. These people suck eggs.
State law allows local governments to condemn private property that's considered a community blight because it harms the health and safety or economic well-being of those surrounding it.
-Legislative Staff
So, in other words, New London can VERY EASILY happen in North Carolina. All a government has to do is decide that a certain section of privately owned land will harm the economic well-being of those around it by not being a manufacturing facility or a building of condos -- and then the government can take it.
If you support freedom and property rights, you simply cannot support this crop of
morons shysters scum of the earth freedom-haters socialists legislators running North Carolina.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:04 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I think you know where I stand on this subject. If you don't, lets just say I have a nice stockpile of lead, blackpowder and modern bullets.
Posted by: Contagion at January 10, 2006 01:29 PM (Q5WxB)
2
I hope it's a big stockpile...and if it's not, I'll bring you more.
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 02:02 PM (/k+l4)
3
The legislative staffer you quote is trying to pull off some verbal legerdemain.
I don't have a problem with calling property that demonstrably harms the health and safety of those nearby as "blighted", though the use of eminent domain is not the first approach to solving the problem that would have occurred to me.
It's the "economic well-being" part that goes off the track. It's defining deviance up, so to speak. It's obvious code language for "you're not producing enough taxes for your neighbors," the argument underlying most misuse of eminent domain.
Posted by: Kent at January 10, 2006 07:02 PM (GSLcH)
4
The legislative staffer is showing that in the world of the NC Legislature, there is no such thing as property rights, no matter the reason!
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 10:44 PM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 09, 2006
Carnivals!
The New Blog Showcase is up at Dave's Not Here. This is where you can read about new blogs in the world. Be sure to head there, visit a few, and comment on at least one of them -- new blogs really do appreciate being found!
This week's
Tarheel Tavern, a weekly Tavern of blogs from North Carolina,
is up over at
Nothing Could be Finer. Head on over and read, people!
Posted by: Ogre at
10:04 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
The Earth Engineer
Your Superhero Profile
|

Your Superhero Name is The Earth Engineer
Your Superpower is Solar
Your Weakness is Ants
Your Weapon is Your Radiation Bullets
Your Mode of Transportation is Space Shuttle
|
Uh...Yay?
Posted by: Ogre at
08:04 PM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Uh, your weakness is ants?
This is me:
Your Superhero Name is The Admiral Justice
Your Superpower is Mathematics
Your Weakness is Bacteria
Your Weapon is Your Venomous Lance
Your Mode of Transportation is Boat
MMM.Kay. How is Mathematics a superpower?
Posted by: oddybobo at January 09, 2006 09:56 PM (6Gm0j)
2
Don't feel bad this is what I was stuck with.
Your Superhero Name is The Wonder Zero
Your Superpower is Accessorizing
Your Weakness is Balloons
Your Weapon is Your Kinetic Throwing Stars
Your Mode of Transportation is Hovercraft
Be afraid, very afraid! I am.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at January 09, 2006 10:15 PM (5+Jvh)
3
A BOAT Oddy? A BOAT? Perhaps you stupify your evil opponents with demonstrations of algebra...
But Arbitratorofall? Umm...I'm not really afraid...you can't even really run me over in your Hovercraft...
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 10:32 PM (s2+Ck)
4
Ohhh wait till you see this one... good thing it goes off names, otherwise I would be very afraid for Bou:
Your Superhero Name is The Composite Glider
Your Superpower is Magic
Your Weakness is Vince Vaughn
Your Weapon is Your Toxic Saw
Your Mode of Transportation is Love Van
Posted by: vw bug at January 09, 2006 11:12 PM (UA4mV)
5
Your Superhero Name is The Platypus Spear
Your Superpower is Chemical
Your Weakness is Toilet Paper
Your Weapon is Your Radiation Club
Your Mode of Transportation is Fire
With Toilet Paper as my weakness, it's not wonder Chemical is my superpower. I'd need something to keep the smell away.
Posted by: Contagion at January 09, 2006 11:19 PM (Q5WxB)
6
Your Superhero Name is The Micro Samurai
Your Superpower is Waking Through Walls
Your Weakness is Love
Your Weapon is Your Anti-matter Pitchfork
Your Mode of Transportation is Catapult
Posted by: Mindflame at January 10, 2006 12:16 AM (SlODe)
7
These are an absolute riot!
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 10:47 AM (s2+Ck)
8
Your Superhero Name is The Alpha Monkey
Your Superpower is Rapping
Your Weakness is Fish
Your Weapon is Your Celestial Torpedoes
Your Mode of Transportation is Zebra
Just keep your fish away from me or I will Rap you a song that will make you regret that fish and I will be laughing at you rolling on the ground as I ride off on my Zebra.
Posted by: Machelle at January 10, 2006 03:05 PM (ZAyoW)
9
I can't believe I'm actually going to post this...
Your Superhero Name is The Sea Albino
Your Superpower is Paranormal
Your Weakness is anything shiny
Your Weapon is Your Thunder Stinger
Your Mode of Transportation is Elephant
So, if my paranormal THUNDER STINGER doesn't get you, I'll just have my elephant SIT ON YOUR HEAD!
Posted by: Smokey at January 10, 2006 09:25 PM (K7uqT)
10
You people are weird.

Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 10:43 PM (s2+Ck)
11
Your Superhero Name is The Future Defender
Your Superpower is X-Ray Vision
Your Weakness is Rain
Your Weapon is Your Fire Crossbow
Your Mode of Transportation is Elephant
*waves shiny Fire Crossbow at Smokey*
Posted by: Harvey at January 12, 2006 04:26 PM (ubhj8)
12
I wonder if he can see it way up there on your Elephant?
Posted by: Ogre at January 12, 2006 07:59 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
When Guns Attack!
Andrew Marra, writer at the Palm Beach Post is reporting that guns are traveling throughout the community, attacking people at will! Beware, people, guns are attacking people!
Fed-up Riviera Beach leaders, troubled by a recent spurt of assault-rifle attacks that left an innocent bystander dead last week
I have seen no pictures of these violent guns attacking people. There is no word on where these evil chunks of metal are based. It is apparently not currently known what sort of evil is causing these usually inanimate objects to shoot. There is also no word on how these things are moving about, since I've never seen any with legs or other mechanical parts for movement.
But that's ok, because the city officials have a plan. They can solve this problem of weapons assaulting people. Are you ready? Pay attention people, for if guns ever jump up and start attacking you, this may be the solution you need to save your life:
"We think we ought to be able to say we don't want handguns in this community," City Manager William Wilkins said.
Why are people this stupid allowed to breed?
Posted by: Ogre at
03:05 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
They wouldn't know an assault-rifle from a handgun if they were side by side under pretty glass. Arghhh! Really, they tick me off!
Posted by: oddybobo at January 09, 2006 03:34 PM (6Gm0j)
2
And they live near me. I'm willing to bet they are the ones that don't know how to drive either and cause everyone else to wreck but themselves. Sigh. I must find a way out of Florida... the problem is... where to go?
Posted by: vw bug at January 09, 2006 03:56 PM (UA4mV)
3
I'm pretty sure, Oddy, they'd identify a handgun as an "assault" weapon if they got a chance.
And VW -- my only suggestion is New Hampshire ( www.freestateproject.org ) and yes, I know it's cold there, but still...
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 08:07 PM (/k+l4)
4
There's been a rash of rampaging pencils lately! Misspelled words are running rampant!
Posted by: DagneyT at January 09, 2006 09:51 PM (X0xxg)
5
Ban 'em! Ban those evil misspelling pencils!!
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 10:30 PM (s2+Ck)
6
Damn...NONE of you get it, do you?
The answer is simple....if an assault rifle attacks, you simply state that you don't want handguns in your community, and the assault rifle, which was, most likely, only attacking you BECAUSE it thought you SUPPORTED handguns in the community, will suddenly stop attacking you and take you out for some coffee instead.
Posted by: kender at January 10, 2006 09:11 AM (udbQA)
7
I wonder if the assault rifles were only attacking handguns, and that's why they want to ban them.
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 10:49 AM (s2+Ck)
8
VW, come to TX, we can drive (albeit too fast), except on ice, and EVERYONE is armed so those pesky assault rifles don't come to our homes.
And remember, "Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat" - courtesy of a bumper sticker I saw at Cheaper Than Dirt.
Posted by: Smokey at January 11, 2006 05:06 AM (K7uqT)
9
"Spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat" -- ROFL!
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 10:52 AM (+Gl1m)
10
I thought you might like that one, and even better, I can still get that bumper sticker for about $2 or so, if you want it.....
Posted by: Smokey at January 11, 2006 11:17 PM (K7uqT)
11
I'm going to look for it at my next Evil Gun Show (TM).
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 11:27 PM (+Gl1m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Lottery to Raise Property Taxes
Oh, this is a nice little tidbit you didn't hear about as the lottery supporters were working on their illegal passing of the lottery bill:
A full 14% of the profits from the lottery will go to counties with effective property tax rates above the state average
Yes, that's profits only, not taking into account the highest paid lottery director in the country and anything else that can fit into the "expenses" category, including the 7% of every single ticket that goes to the retailer.
So get ready for this line from county commissioners: "If we raise our property tax rate above the state average, we will get more money from the state for school construction to offset the tax increase."
Holy crap. It's going to be a massive race to see who can raise property taxes higher and faster than other counties -- because for those who are a little slow on the math, the higher everyone raises their taxes, the higher the average gets, and the higher everyone has to raise their taxes to get "above the average."
I sure hope those lawsuits that clearly outline how the lottery was passed illegally get through.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Even Less Freedom in NC
In North Carolina, despite outward appearances, there is little freedom. For example, if you want to serve the sick and poor, you must ask permission. If the state denies you that permission, you may not serve and help the sick and poor, no matter your qualifications.
In
this case, a hospital wanted to expand and build more beds to serve and help more people. The hospital was fully qualified and had actual real doctors, nurses, and (of course) administrators. They owned some land and wanted to build.
The state said no. The state determined that the hospital did not have a so-called "certificate of need" to build, so they would not be permitted to build. Nothing else mattered. Actual sick people who needed hospitalization? Nope, that doesn't matter to the state.
All that matters to the state of North Carolina is them retaining all power over all people all of the time. That's just incredibly wrong. There is absolutely no logical reason that a private hospital, with private funds, should not be able to build a new building. The state has NO business stopping them.
But they are.
No, this is not freedom in any sense of the word.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:05 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
We can’t have that, too many hospitals might mean, more choices and a lowered price of health care. We wouldn’t want that. Sigh.
What is worse in Gainesville, the city government was always telling the homeless shelter to stop feeding so many people. They wanted us to let people go hungry when there was plenty of food and volunteers.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 09, 2006 02:42 PM (SlODe)
2
That's right -- you can't feed them, they might eat -- and the government really would rather they die off so they stop costing so much money.
Follow the money...and then get ill.
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 08:05 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 08, 2006
New Neighbor #39
It's time again for the weekly New Neighbor feature here at Ogre's Politics and Views. Each week Ogre randomly selects a blog from the large Evangelical Blogroll over there on the right side. This week's Neighbor is:
Cowboyology is written by Clint, a resident of the Great White North, in Toronto and Ontario. I was in Ontario once, a long, long time ago -- for a band competition...
The blog's purpose is to "SPUR one another on toward love and good deeds." Nicely done, Clint!
The blog layout is a standard blogger, but hey, black text on a white background works just fine, and has for a very long time. And throughout the text, there's various different pictures, including those of
a barn owl. The blog appears to be updated pretty regularly -- at least a few times a week.
There's also a long post about
UVA UVAM VIDENDO VARIA FIT. It's Cowboy Proverb #11, but you'll have to head over there to read what it means if you don't read Latin.
So go over there and have a read. Perhaps you'll find a new blog to add to your Blogroll -- I've added him to my list of Neighbors. And don't forget to leave a comment letting him know what you think about the place!
Posted by: Ogre at
09:13 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Ogre, Thanks for the plug! I hope I can continue to spur you and others onward.
Posted by: Clint at January 09, 2006 01:19 PM (onsbP)
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 02:06 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Biblical Truth
I've been reading a bit lately (I read quite a lot, actually), and I've read a couple things that have really stuck with me. Here's a theological question for Sunday morning for you -- some people may have seen it before, but I just can't stop thinking about it:
Is something true because the Bible says it is (Christians believe on faith that the Bible is the inspired, authoritative word of God), or does the Bible say something is true because it IS true?
Or is there another answer?
Posted by: Ogre at
12:05 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I don't understand the question.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 08, 2006 06:14 PM (SlODe)
2
I think one of the "truths" that my mentor taught me regarding business may be applicable:
Perception is Reality, the Truth is only the Truth.
David
Posted by: David at January 08, 2006 07:10 PM (Jdbsc)
3
Nothing is true BECAUSE it is written in the Bible, it was written in the Bible because it is true. Therefore, (if limited to your two choices) it is true because IT IS TRUE! But really, it is true because GOD said it is true, and therefore MADE IT TRUE!
Posted by: Smokey at January 08, 2006 07:28 PM (K7uqT)
4
Mindflame, it's proposing two different options to explain the source of truth.
Good answer, Smokey.
David, sure, but the truth is also the truth.
Posted by: Ogre at January 08, 2006 07:30 PM (s2+Ck)
5
Neither....
Truth is truth...God inspired the ideas behind the bible, but he used men to write them down, and he used men in the church to decide what books written were inspired by him...
However, the truth is not the same as scientific history, or science...many stories are to teach us about how God acts, and how men should act..
For example, Jonah in the whale is about following God's command even though we think it might be dangerous, and about how repentance can bring God's mercy...
Posted by: boinkie at January 08, 2006 11:20 PM (/0o+Y)
6
So, boinkie, you don't believe the Bible is truth. What, to you, is absolute truth (or is there such a thing)?
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 02:40 AM (s2+Ck)
7
This is kinda like the old bumper sticker that my dad years ago revised:
Original: God said it, I believe it, and that settles it.
Dad's Version: God said it, that settles it, and I believe it.
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at January 09, 2006 12:31 PM (M7kiy)
8
I like your Dad's version!
Posted by: Ogre at January 09, 2006 12:45 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2006
NC Gas Tax Increase
This past week, NC Conservatives presented the government with a petition asking that the recent gas tax increase, that will not be used for roads, to be repealed.
Don't look for it to happen any time soon...or later.
In order for the gas tax to be repealed, the Democrats leading North Carolina would have to agree to it. However, Jim Black, who has a personal checkbook that draws on tax revenues, is highly unlikely to support reducing the amount in "his" account.
The petition presented had over 22,000 signatures of NC voters on it, asking for the tax to be repealed. Check out
the website for more facts about that "gas" tax and where the money goes. Then thank North Carolina Democrats for ensuring that you have to pay more taxes.
Posted by: Ogre at
05:02 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I think raising the gas tax is robbery of MY money. When gas prices are bloated from greed anyway then our representatives decide to get their share of the pie. It's time for another Boston Tea Party.
Posted by: Carlton Crain PA-C at January 11, 2006 03:15 PM (5gjeH)
2
I need to do some research and find a similar product in today's economy that is similar to the place that tea took in Revolutionary economy. I'm not sure there is such a thing, however...
Posted by: Ogre at January 11, 2006 07:55 PM (/k+l4)
3
Two things need to be done for our highways. We need to spend the gas tax money on our highways and we need to make Truck Driving a profession again. These people we are allowing to drive these 80,000 lb killing machines on our highways is rediculous. Just ask the parents of the 7 children recently killed in Florida.
Posted by: James Harrington at January 27, 2006 03:17 PM (UE4Pq)
4
They are professionals. Do you have any idea how much they have to go through and how much they have to pay to use the roads?
In NC, the majority of the accidents with trucks can actually be blamed on poor road conditions -- such as roads that should be larger than they are or have more lanes.
Posted by: Ogre at January 27, 2006 03:29 PM (/k+l4)
5
Democrats have controlled NC for so long, that the voting public has become "democratic sheep", and like sheep we are being led to the slaughter. We deserve what we vote for.
Posted by: Michael A. Littlejohn at February 16, 2006 03:21 PM (T33wF)
6
And they've run it so long that they have drawn the district lines to absolutely ensure that Republicans can never obtain control -- that's the hardest part!
Posted by: Ogre at February 16, 2006 03:56 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Media Liars?
So...I have a question.
If President Bush, when discussing the war in Iraq, relied on sources of information that were inaccurate, but no one knew at the time were inaccurate, and said some things that may not have been correct, lied, then...
When the media announced that the miners in WV were alive, by relying on information that was incorrect at the time, even if it was not known, doesn't that mean that the media lied?
Now can we all run around repeating, "The Media Lied?"
Posted by: Ogre at
03:09 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Yep, if the left does not know the difference between lies and mistakes why should we.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 07, 2006 05:31 PM (SlODe)
2
Yes, "the media lied, people died." Let's all chant together now. . .
Posted by: Monika at January 07, 2006 06:15 PM (bmWjK)
3
Shouldn't your post read "Are the Media Liars?"
I thought Media is the plural of Medium.
Posted by: Justin Thibault at January 07, 2006 06:29 PM (XK1Nc)
4
Justin, it's a headline designed to draw attention. Like the press I'm mocking, I tend not to follow the proper rules of English in headlines to make it fit, or to intentionally draw your attention.

Posted by: Ogre at January 07, 2006 09:30 PM (s2+Ck)
5
I've been foiled by the Ogre!
Posted by: Justin Thibault at January 08, 2006 02:16 AM (XK1Nc)
6
Yes. That's an objective way of analyzing sources.
Posted by: Eaglet at January 10, 2006 01:01 PM (gCXHX)
7
Seems to be fair...
Of course that's what sets the conservatives and non-government types apart from the media and big-government types of all stripes (Democrat and Republican) -- some of us are honest, while they are not.
Posted by: Ogre at January 10, 2006 02:01 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NC Legislature Smoke & Mirrors
In the legislator's minds, the North Carolina Legislature exists for one reason -- to spend money. To do that, of course, they have to TAKE money from someone who earned it. The government does NOT generate ANYTHING -- they are only capable of taking.
In recent years, doubling the state expenditures is not enough -- they want MORE to spend. After raising taxes literally over $20 million, they STILL don't have enough. So the state is now playing games with money to spend even more.
One way they are doing this was a big thing in Washington, DC before the Republicans took over in the 90s -- unfunded mandates. For those who don't remember those, it was when the Congress demanded that states spend money on certain programs, but then wouldn't provide funding for it -- in effect, forcing the states to spend money.
Now they're only bribing states, but that's an issue for another day.
That was stopped years ago by Congress. It would have been better stopped by repealing the 17th Amendment (which stopped states from electing US Senators which was a GOOD thing), but that's an issue for another day.
But
now the state of North Carolina is doing it to it's counties. The state tells the county how much it WILL spend on Medicaid (medical care for the alleged "poor" which is actually better care than most people get who PAY and WORK for it), but do not provide the counties with the money to pay for it.
There's an easy solution, but one that won't be taken. Counties should just send the bill to the state or simply ignore them. What will the state do, arrest the county leaders? And then what? The state will have to pay anyway! Counties of North Carolina, take control -- tell the state to pay or get lost.
But, alas, no -- what will happen instead is that the counties will raise money to pay for it the only way they can -- through raising property taxes. Then the state will say that they didn't raise taxes and the county legislators will say that THEY didn't raise taxes either. And the working person? Well sorry, you're just screwed.
Posted by: Ogre at
01:03 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Sigh, this is something that really bothers me. The Feds run the States and the States run the Counties, all of it is unconstitutional. We are supposed to be a republic.
Posted by: Mindflame at January 07, 2006 05:33 PM (SlODe)
2
Republic? The last republic I remember was Rome, until Gaius Julius Caesar desasembled it because of guess what, corruption.
Posted by: Arbitratorofall at January 07, 2006 09:05 PM (5+Jvh)
3
That's right, Mindflame, it's completely backwards these days.
An Arbitratorofall, he did says we are SUPPOSED to be a Republic...
Posted by: Ogre at January 07, 2006 09:31 PM (s2+Ck)
4
One of the reasons I moved OUT of Charlotte -- you will have TWO rates!
The City of Charlotte will tax you AND the County of Mecklenburg will ALSO tax you! It is highly likely that both will raise taxes this year as well.
Oh, and the city likes to raise your taxes by revaluating your property every couple years, too.
Also -- you car is property, too, so you'll have to pay property taxes on that too, if you get one.
The current city rate is .42 per $100 and the county rate is .8368 per $100. (I moved to Iredell County where my tax rate is .435). Oh, and if you're in one of the city's "business districts," there's an additional tax of .0174 to .0668 depending on the district.
And the city will charge you taxes that are not voluntary for water into your house AND water out of your house (sewer -- including RUNOFF, not just through the pipes); and sanitation fees (sorry, no choices in garbage pickup, you have to use the city); and on and on and on...
Posted by: Ogre at January 08, 2006 01:58 PM (s2+Ck)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 120 >>
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.2454 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2348 seconds, 125 records returned.
Page size 82 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.