Confederate Yankee
January 13, 2010
Good News! NC Port's Contractors Spilled More PETN
Hey, it's only a slurry of one of the most powerful explosives on earth. We don't need to be careful with it, or anything:
Nine 50-kilogram drums filled with the explosive PETN were punctured by a forklift early Tuesday as they were being unloaded at the port. Also known as pentaerythritol tetranitrate, the colorless PETN crystals are used in detonating cords for industrial explosions, as well as in heart medications.
Officials said Wednesday afternoon that they had found more of the PETN spilled at the port that didn't come from the punctured drums, which necessitated additional cleanup. They said they didn't know how the PETN was spilled but said it might have occurred during shipping.
That's encouraging news. It seems that would-be terrorists don't need to manufacture explosives or try to smuggle them into the country. They can simply get custodial positions at the nation's ports, and then they can blow up what they retrieve from their dustpans or wring out of a mop.
Homeland security? Not so much.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
04:15 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
It's a weird thing. Ports seem like an incredibly obvious target. I can think of all kinds of ways a terrorist could strike at a port. Some require no raw materials at all. And yet, it hasn't happened. Are terrorists so stupid they don't see the possibilities? Or is security better than we think it is?
Posted by: wolfwalker at January 14, 2010 06:42 AM (hypy8)
2
Yes Wolf, we seem to be lucky in the average intelegence of the terrorists out there.
I used to work at an airport. Yikes. I could easily do some nasty stuff if minded.
Throughout life, I've noticed a few things. Rich kids seem to have little common sense and no hand skills. Same goes for the highly educated. As many of the terrorists out there seem to be from those groups (Osama is an engineer, many of his henchmen are doctors, the thunderwear bomber was a college kid as well) they too seem to suffer from these same failing....thankfully. They might have theory down, but execution is lacking. They also keep wanting to go for the BIG HIT, and have tripped up in the planning for those, though lots were broken by the waterboarding.
Posted by: JP at January 14, 2010 11:43 AM (VxiFL)
3
oh, and they must have some of the same forklift drivers I work with there. At least our warehouse has no explosive stuff for them to hit, and very few flammables.
Posted by: JP at January 14, 2010 11:45 AM (VxiFL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Haitian Hell
As you probably know by now, a 7.0 earthquake centered just five miles underground apparently destroyed the Haitian capital of Port-au- Prince yesterday, and damged cites and towns throughout the impoverished island nation.
World governments, the
Red Cross and other volunteer aide organizations are rushing in to save as many lives as possible.
The exact scope of the devastation is not precisely known and may not be known for some time, but there are expectations that thousands are dead in collapsed buildings, and that as many as three million people will need some sort of assistance in the wake of this natural disaster.
We're going to do the best we can with what we have, but we could do better.
In recent years there have been some novel ideas floated on using retiring U.S. Navy vessels as floating emergency response bases for natural disasters and terrorist attacks on coastal regions in our hemisphere. Theoretically, ships could be based strategically on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts as well as in a port in the Gulf of Mexico with supplies and rescue equipment pre-loaded for dispatch on very short notice.
An acquaintance of mine named Ward Brewer (which I've unfortunately fallen out of contact with) was a firm proponent of the idea, and proposed using some of the retiring
Tarawa-class amphibious assault ships in this role. While obsolete by Navy standards and being replaced by more modern vessels, many of the features that made the
Tarawa-class so well-suited for landing Marines on hostile shore would work exceptionally well for transporting heavy equipment, medical supplies, and rescue craft to areas in need. Each
Tarawa can create fresh water, electricity, and has a 300-bed hospital with four operating rooms, 17 ICU rooms, and a 1,000-unit blood bank.
As it so happens, two
Tarawa class ships are still in service, and presumably could be re-tasked to this rescue role upon their retirements with minimal transition work, and the first ship in the series is presently inactive and presumably ready to be refit as needed.
With real unemployment
presently at 22% and skilled American tradesmen at shipyards around the nation needing work, it would seem to be an excellent time for a President so concerned about America's image to announce plans to turn these old warriors into angels of mercy.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:18 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
We do already have the Mercy Ships, who do a great job of being floating hospitals around the Caribbean. Makes sense to support the infrastructure we've got before deploying new (and expensive) gear, no?
Regards,
Brian
Posted by: Brian L. at January 13, 2010 12:17 PM (l8hK6)
2
I don't know if you missed the gist of the post or what, but he was mentioning Tarawa AAS', which aren't new, nor is operating them as expensive as it could be.
Posted by: GS at January 13, 2010 12:25 PM (w8ZVR)
3
GS -- Not trying to disparage any existing efforts; just pointing out other operations that are already out there.
B.
Posted by: Brian L. at January 13, 2010 01:25 PM (l8hK6)
4
The Mercy Ships are effective as hospitals, but the conversion of the Tarawa class ships would be into Disaster response ships. They would have the ability to support many SAR helicopters at once, and would be able to have on board vehicles, heavy equipment and smaller boats which would help the search. They would also have hospital facilities, desalinization, large stores of fuel, emergency food and water, and quarters for rescuers and victims. The majority of major disasters (in this country and in most others) are Hurricanes and Earthquakes and usually most damage happens along a coast line. It makes perfect sense to convert these ships into something that would be very useful to so many in their time of need.
Posted by: Web at January 13, 2010 02:23 PM (x6nx5)
5
Unfortunately for Haiti, the current administration would much rather posture than do anything useful.
However the idea is sound - retask a helicopter assault ship for rescue operations. They do have all the facilities, and, as we already have them, along with trained crew, it really does make a lot of sense.
Now to find someone with the credibility to get this on an agenda somewhere...
Posted by: wpw at January 13, 2010 02:41 PM (9OLSg)
6
wpw,
I just heard The One on the radio and he is promising a coordinated response.
What is a coordinated response?
Posted by: David at January 13, 2010 02:47 PM (dccG2)
7
Usually that means military airlift for civilian and/or military personnel and supplies, but with this administration, who knows?
Just so people understand the size of the ships being discussed in the original post, http://www.woodallphotography.com/photos/763983179_7LmBh-L.jpg
this is a Tarawa-class vessel (coincidentally photographed at Morehead City State Port).
Historically the US has made use of carriers for natural disaster recovery.
Posted by: wpw at January 13, 2010 02:58 PM (9OLSg)
8
It is a sound idea. An aircraft carrier can do a lot, but it is not the most efficient means of delivering disaster relief. Dedicated ships could do so much more, at less cost, and for an extended duration.
Haiti, for all intents and purposes, has ceased to exist as a nation. This relief effort is going to last for years.
Posted by: ThomasD at January 14, 2010 12:37 AM (jVrU7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thug Life: Democrat Roughs Up Reporter
Poor Martha Coakley.
The hand-picked machine politician selected as the heir to Ted Kennedy's Senate seat is having a tough time as of late. Ahead by double digits weeks before before the election, Coakley's campaign has been steady beat-down by revelations of her failures as a prosecutor to treat child predators aggressively, an arrogant, yet timid public facade, dumb political statements (
still uses tired Bush/Cheney arguments, claims there are
no terrorists in Afghanistan), and now, there emerges on-tape video evidence that someone associated with her campaign knocking down a journalist politely asking a
simple question:
A photographer from the Associated Press got a good shot of the guy with Coakley's campaign that knocked down John McCormack of
The Weekly Standard as Coakley looks on with her hands in her pockets and walks away.
McCormack has now
revealed that the thug-on-loan is Michael Meehan, who seems to have been sent by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee to "help" Coakley as she desperately
met with DC lobbyists to raise money and hopefully save her dying campaign in a state that her staff
can't even spell.
It's amazing how political fortunes can change so quickly, but when intense public scrutiny of the campaign put Coakley in a position where she had to perform, she cracked.
I think the revelations of the past few weeks is great news for the people of Massachusetts. They now have a much better idea of the kind of lockstep, "me-too" Senator she would be if elected, and the kind of Senator Scott Brown will be if elected to the
people's Senate seat.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:53 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
As I walked down the street, a man who appeared to be associated with the Coakley campaign pushed me into a freestanding metal railing. I ended up on the sidewalk. I was fine. He helped me up from the ground, but kept pushing up against me, blocking my path toward Coakley down the street.
McCormack's own quote.
This might be the most polite "goon" on record.
Time to quit your bitchin
Posted by: pat1213 at January 13, 2010 11:23 AM (gkX/Q)
2
Wow, pat. I've learned this week that I will never take seriously the outrage of the left in regards to racism, sexism or the silencing of free speech.
They are hypocrites. Pat is one. Taylor Marsh is another. Now the left is crying "sexism" in regards to Coakley. Hey, women in politics need to get used to being Palinized. That's life now that the left has abandoned its "principled" stand against sexism.
Posted by: w3bgrrl at January 13, 2010 11:35 AM (IsqLi)
3
When the guy who gets pushed down, says the pusher helped him up, and he was "pushed" into a free standing railing. This ain't Tianamen square. There is plenty to be upset about, don't manufacture it.
Posted by: pat1213 at January 13, 2010 11:49 AM (gkX/Q)
4
pat
You are one transparent sob. Physically assaulting a reporter--pushing him to the ground qualifies as assault whether or not he is helped up afterwards--because of the questions being asked is outrageous. Continuing to assault afterward to protect that idiot Coakley from being asked about her idiotic "no terrorists in Afghanistan" comment is equally outrageous.
You on the left are so frightened and so lacking in substantive responses that violence is your only answer. As a result, you presume upon the ongoing civility and even passivity of your political opponents and most Americans. And while Americans--at least those who aren't leftards--are reluctant to resort to the violence that the left so adores, if it comes to playing cowboys and leftards I can assure you that there will be few 'tards left standing.
Posted by: iconoclast at January 13, 2010 12:04 PM (O8ebz)
5
I'm just glad that he didn't bite off his fingers.
Or set fire to his church.
Or shoot him in his driveway as a "protest".
If the critera for excluding an event from the realm of Assault is it not being the Tianamen square massacre, then by your own account, the San Francisco Homecoming Gang Rape isn't Assault.
If most people did what that guy did at work, it would be considered assault.
Posted by: brando at January 13, 2010 12:36 PM (IPGju)
6
Meehan is an Obama appointee to the Broadcasting Board of Governors. Unique concept of the First Amendment he displays there. Is that what we want running Voice of America and Radio Free Europe?
Posted by: Tully at January 13, 2010 03:37 PM (A9IXO)
7
>>"This might be the most polite "goon" on record."
Right, at least he did not bite anyones finger off. By Dem goon standards he was a positive gentleman.
Posted by: Liam at January 13, 2010 04:18 PM (cOxzj)
8
I think this clip should be a campaign commercial for brown. maybe the rap song thug life playing in the background with the message "send another one to congress.
Posted by: rumcrook¾ at January 13, 2010 09:19 PM (60WiD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 12, 2010
The More You Know
Do You know what the differences between Newsweek journalist Michael Isikoff and WorldNet Daily columnist/martial artist/actor/pitchman Chuck Norris are?
Norris has proven he's at least a moderate talent at more than one thing. Also, when
Norris publishes what some consider a conspiratorial fantasy,
people don't die.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:56 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Avatards
I'm still trying to determine how I feel about this:
James Cameron's completely immersive spectacle "Avatar" may have been a little too real for some fans who say they have experienced depression and suicidal thoughts after seeing the film because they long to enjoy the beauty of the alien world Pandora...
[snip]
A post by a user called Elequin expresses an almost obsessive relationship with the film.
"That's all I have been doing as of late, searching the Internet for more info about 'Avatar.' I guess that helps. It's so hard I can't force myself to think that it's just a movie, and to get over it, that living like the Na'vi will never happen. I think I need a rebound movie," Elequin posted.
A user named Mike wrote on the fan Web site "Naviblue" that he contemplated suicide after seeing the movie.
"Ever since I went to see 'Avatar' I have been depressed. Watching the wonderful world of Pandora and all the Na'vi made me want to be one of them. I can't stop thinking about all the things that happened in the film and all of the tears and shivers I got from it," Mike posted. "I even contemplate suicide thinking that if I do it I will be rebirthed in a world similar to Pandora and the everything is the same as in 'Avatar.' "
Other fans have expressed feelings of disgust with the human race and disengagement with reality.
Okay—now I know how I feel. I feel disgust.
Listen up, cupcakes.
While it is as clichéd as Hell, the world really is what you make of it. Odds are that your life sucks because
you enable the suck. You are responsible for it, and your negative attitude is the primary ingredient in the suck sandwich you love to gag yourself on.
I look at people CNN interviewed and the posting of these faceless drones and see people wallowing in woe-is-me mediocrity and co-dependency, waiting for someone else to give their lives meaning and purpose.
Life doesn't work like that.
Other people do not exist to give your miserable existence meaning or to give you edification. You and you alone are responsible for your actions, your thoughts, and how you deal with the circumstances of your life. You could be great, and make a great life, but you are terrified of doing anything worthwhile. You prefer to trap yourself into a pathetic, unhappy life. I feel no sorrow, only contempt for you.
Yes, some people are born with certain advantages, and some people are born with disadvantages. We all have strengths, and we all have flaws.
These—
Avatards—live at the most prosperous time in the history of planet Earth, and have lives sufficiently comfortable that they can shell out more than some people in the world make in months, just to go blankly stare at a cartoon utopia. They then leave the theater, climb into their late model car and drive to their suburban home or apartment, grab a snack out of the fridge, and contemplate how much their lives suck.
These fools willing serve time in a solitary confinement of their own making, with lives not worth living because of the hell they create for themselves. They feel the world is better off without them.
They are probably right.
(h/t: Drudge)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
02:30 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I will never see Avatar. The preview's Native/Vietnam/Iraq/Afghanistan clustermessage was just... too much.
Posted by: GS at January 12, 2010 02:34 PM (w8ZVR)
2
I wonder if CNN just got sideswiped. The stuff they are quoting sound just like what was written on Amazon.com about the 3 Wolf, 1 Moon T-Shirt and Tuscan Whole Milk, 1 Gallon, 128 fl oz.
I mean, this is CNN - it isn't like they've never been duped before ...
Posted by: Dan Irving at January 12, 2010 02:54 PM (zw8QA)
3
Conf Yank, you pepper the crowd with self-help talk. It may help them.
Yet, the reality is that SATAN is a REAL SPIRIT - and he was powerfully moving through that film. His power over the human soul should never be underestimated when people sit under his beguiling, seducing power as his spirit moves to take power over their souls.
That movie powerfully "ministered" the spirit of Satan. Yes, it did. Satan is a real spirit... and people don't realize that a spirit can gain power over their souls and their thoughts are not their own - nor either are their feelings - once that spirit gains control.
I would advise these people to pray in the name of Jesus to be set free of mind control, soul control, emotional bondage, and spiritual oppression.
(Also splains Obama Kool Aid)
Posted by: laura at January 12, 2010 03:39 PM (JFvHi)
4
You hit the nail on the head, CF. These 'tards live in a hell of their own making. I'd cry if their wailing wasn't so gol-darn hy-larious.
Methinks there are a lot of pampered little pusses out there, yearning for utopia (see last year's election). In a way, it's really too bad we don't have universal military service. A few rounds with a DI would set these clowns straight.
Posted by: Texas Pete at January 12, 2010 05:10 PM (giU14)
5
I have seen the movie. The effects are something else. But like all tech movies, they forgot the script. The movie goes on and on and all you wish for is that they all die so you can leave. Same problem I had with Titanic, I wanted to reach out and push Leo under the water.
Laura, you are wrong about Satan. According to my family, I embody the individual. So he is not a spirit.
Posted by: David at January 12, 2010 05:44 PM (ZgM5r)
6
Ship these avatards to Haiti to help with the relief efforts. They'll get over themselves and their Pandora blues real fast.
Posted by: Zhombre at January 12, 2010 08:53 PM (8mdQg)
7
Avatar was a really good movie, but these people sound like Holden Caulfield, people so well-off that they can spend all of their time complaining that life isn't how they want it to be, because they don't have to work for a living.
Posted by: MAModerate at January 12, 2010 10:18 PM (nuh/4)
8
Let them go...
The gene pool needs a little draining anyhow
Posted by: whitestone at January 13, 2010 08:36 AM (MSlrR)
9
Heard this on the radio last night... the more they talked, the more it ended up sounding like these folks had zero interaction with sci-fi and fantasy, but should have been target audiences.
"Young people going through changes and yearning for an escape from the stresses of everyday life"-- um, that's a standard fan....
Of course, most of the geeks I know are far too well adjusted to consider suicide because of some pretty graphics.
Posted by: Foxfier at January 13, 2010 01:19 PM (Icb0H)
10
Avatards! A complaint has an effective military range of 0.0 meters. Arm yourself with something else. Know that the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand, therefore repent and believe the gospel that you might live. Turn from your sin and to God. Whoever confesses Christ, believes Him, and obeys His word, will be saved and will dwell with Him in the new heavens and new earth. Repent and live!
Posted by: RepentNLive! at January 13, 2010 03:06 PM (y5bPZ)
11
I thought the movie sucked. The messages were clear. First, to marines (and thus soldiers in general), frag your officers. Next, the Indians should have won, because they so loved and cherished the land (a.) they were squatters who ate everything within a reasonable distance, used up every resource, and moved on, not exactly eco-friendly peoples for the most part; b.) the reason they didn't totally destroy their environment was because they were so barbaric they could barely tolerate their not so distant related tribes, and would murder their more distant relatives if they thought they outnumbered them (how gallant!)). Next, that we have destroyed our world (far from it, probably can't for millennium, even with continued population expansion, only we ourselves will become uncomfortably crowded). And, finally, that civilization is not as good as barbaric life. Oh, wait, their is the mother earth worship in there too.
Yeah, a real pos, right from the fevered minds of Hollywood. I hated the movie. I am glad the feel good educated are having spasms. I hope they choke to death on their evil intents and hopes. Their parents and grandparents used drugs to escape to that fiction world, I guess the younger generation is to lazy to even figure that out.
*sigh*
Posted by: Doom at January 13, 2010 07:42 PM (SQqLJ)
12
"...and these remain: faith, hope and love, and the greatest of these is love."
Do people who obsess over movie fantasies sound like people who have found love, or are capable of actually experiencing it? Yet, it is their salvation, and ours. Not in a milquetoasty, hopenchangy way, but love as in shared intimacy (not primarily sexual) and spirituality. This is, of course, hard to achieve when you're spending your precious days pining for a fantasy world of beings on a planet that never existed.
Posted by: mikemcdaniel at January 13, 2010 11:54 PM (JyD4t)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Port of Morehead City Closed By Explosives Incident
Everything between 4th St. and the Hwy 70 bridge to Radio Island has been shutdown in Morehead City, NC, in response to a hazmat emergency.
According to
local media,
nine containers carrying explosives were involved. No media are reporting precisely what the explosive material is, but Marine Corps EOD technicians from nearby Cherry Point are on-scene.
Is is SOP to call in a military EOD team for industrial accidents?
Update: I guess it is entirely appropriate to call in military EOD when the
spilled explosives are PETN.
80 grams is enough to bring down an airliner. We don't yet know how large the containers were that were damaged, but since there are at least nine and this is an industrial shipment, a conservative guess is that we're probably talking a minimum of hundreds of pounds of the explosive.
As an aside, I wonder what kind of port security they have at Morehead. It seems to me such a shipment would make one heck of hijacking target.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:26 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Why wouldn't you want to call in a military grade EOD team to handle a HAZMAT situation? I would imagine they are much more competent and able to handle the situation than local authorities, especially given the magnitude.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 12, 2010 10:55 AM (vZ8Oa)
2
There's also the possibility that military supplies are stored / shipped through the port, so the military wants to keep their own stuff intact.
Posted by: SDN at January 12, 2010 11:27 AM (S78cq)
3
Exactly. People should give me the benefit of the doubt. I'm commander in chief and I might know just a little bit more than the average joe. Heck, I knew enough to stage one of the most brilliant photo-ops in Presidential history at West Point.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 12, 2010 11:32 AM (vZ8Oa)
4
If explosives, or explosive components are involved, then yes, EOD techs should be in charge. Most hazmat teams are not trained or familiar with explosives and how to handle or clean them up in case of an accident. Fire departments, and law enforcement are in the same boat, with most being trained to ID explosives, and to NOT handle them. EOD personnel are. Good to have the knowledge on site, if to do nothing more than to make sure cleanup workers do not intermix items that could explode if intermixed, or handled roughly.
Posted by: RJ at January 12, 2010 11:43 AM (er7+p)
5
Morehead is the primary embarkation port for Camp LeJeune. This is really just an unfortunate accident... might have some unaccustomed ice to deal with, or something like that.
It's routine to see military hardware around the Port, all the way from simple 6x6 trucks to LHA vessels.
Posted by: wpw at January 12, 2010 12:55 PM (9OLSg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Pro-Terrorist Obama Ally Invites Muslim Brotherhood to "Join Us in Cleansing Our Country."
You remember Jodie Evans, don't you?
She's a co-founder of Code Pink, an
apologist for Osama bin Laden, and bundler for Barack Obama that gets direct access to the White House.
She now inviting the group that spawned some of the most dangerous terrorists in the world to join Code Pink in &quut;
cleansing our country.&quut;
In a more sane time in American history, Jodie Evans, Medea Benjamin, and other leaders of Code Pink would be viewed with the same scorn as the
copperheads, but now they are instead embraced and consulted by the President himself.
We shouldn't be surprised that Barack Obama embraces radicals that hate America, as he has done that consistently his entire life. We retain the right, however, to be utterly appalled.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:11 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Whats wrong with being Muslim? Heck, I'm a Muslim but nobody would ever guess it!
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 12, 2010 10:56 AM (vZ8Oa)
2
"We retain the right, however, to be utterly appalled."
We also retain the right to totally reject this political circle-jerk with sworn enemies. Much more of this and the "sedition - treason" cry will be heard throughout the land.
The "cleaning out" we need to do could easily start with HER.
Posted by: Dell at January 12, 2010 07:05 PM (zlXS5)
3
Wow. That vid pretty much nails it. That's what Libs think.
Posted by: brando at January 13, 2010 01:49 AM (LjEkE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2010
Money Bomb
As I'm typing this, Republican Scott Brown is in the later stages of his attempt to raise $500,000 in his run for Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat. He seems to be doing okay. He's raised more than $836,000, and the night isn't over.
Rather obviously, this race isn't just about filling a vacant Senate seat. It has become something of skirmish over the health care rationing scheme known as Obamacare.
That Brown is raising so much in one day in an off-year special election is a clear warning to Democrats that November will be bloody, indeed.
Update: Brown broke $1,000,000 well before 11:00 PM ET.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:39 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
He ended up with $1.3 million at the end of the day. What does this tell us about the state of politics in Massachusetts, that a Republican nobody from a small town in Massachusetts, without the help of the National Republican Party, can raise that much money for the final week of his campaign?
I hope Martha Coakley is quaking in her boots. She's gonna lose next week.
Posted by: Stoutcat at January 12, 2010 09:12 AM (kKdtK)
2
He isn't going to win. DNC will take this election, YEHAWWWWWWWW
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at January 12, 2010 09:49 AM (vZ8Oa)
3
Thanks Nancy, I appreciate you sticking up for me. Even when my approval is rock bottom, I know you'll be there for me.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 12, 2010 10:58 AM (vZ8Oa)
4
No problem Barack, us Democraps, I mean Democrats have to stick together through thick and thin. You know Barack, we probably will lose the house, but we'll still have each other. Don't forget that promise you made to me about me becoming your Chief of Staff if I lose my job as Speaker!
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at January 12, 2010 11:00 AM (vZ8Oa)
5
How could I forget Nancy? Of course your job will be secure either as Speaker or Chief of Staff.
Posted by: Barack Obama at January 12, 2010 11:00 AM (vZ8Oa)
6
Barack Hussien Obama! How dare you convene a meeting with Nancy without telling me first. I am deeply hurt.
Posted by: Joe Biden at January 12, 2010 01:56 PM (eULaJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
That Just Ain't Right
While I haven't had the chance to get out on the water in several years, I used to be an avid fisherman, stalking largemouth bass in lakes, farm ponds, and rivers. For bass fisherman, the &qout;holy grail&qout; has long been the 22 lb, 4 oz record bass caught by George W. Perry in Georgia in 1932. The catch spawned (sorry, couldn't resist) a multi-billion dollar industry, professional bass sport fishing, and made famous guys with names like Bill, Tom, and Ray.
Everyone suspected that one day soon Perry's record would be tied or broken, but we always figured it would be a good old boy in a remote Southern slough, or a new breed of big bass hunters that specialize in California's reservoir bass.
A bleach-blond
Manabu Kurita isn't exactly the good old boy anyone expected to tie the record.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:58 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Wow. Now that's a big fish. I like some Bill, but we northern types like Babe.
Posted by: brando at January 11, 2010 01:30 PM (IPGju)
Posted by: David at January 11, 2010 01:43 PM (VpBDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
So Hot, We'll Freeze to Death
I had to go out a few minutes early this morning to use the global warming scraper™ on my car's windows before I could begin my morning commute.
It seems that some scientists are suggesting that instead of being an exception, that might one day become a
regular part of my routine.
The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.
Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.
That's just the teaser; may sure you really dig into the
article to get a full taste of just how much climate change cultists have lied to you about the direction our climate is heading.
The current, bitterly cold weather blanketing much of the northern hemisphere is a taste of what real science predicts for our future in the short term, and the
long term as well.
The last 10,000 years have been very good to us; the 90,000 before that
sucked, as it will again when our present interglacial comes to an end. The longer your view is of history, the more we see just how lucky we are that the human species had such an extended warm period in which to develop, but that long view also shows us that we're due for a long, and nasty temperature drop. We're overdue for the
next ice age:
These data should frighten you. All of civilization developed during the last interglacial, and the data show that such interglacials are very brief. Our time looks about up. Data such as these are what led us to state, in the Preface, that the next ice age is about to hit us, any millennium now. It does not take a detailed theory to make this prediction. We don't necessarily know why the next ice age is imminent (at least on a geological timescale), but the pattern is unmistakable.
The real reason to be frightened is that we really don't understand what causes the pattern. We don't know why the ice ages are broken by the short interglacials. We do know something – that the driving force is astronomical.
Mankind is self-important, and arrogantly wants to believe that we can control the climate. Because of this we have wasted billions of dollars (and are poised to waste trillions more) trying to reverse a process in which we play a seemingly insignificant role.
We need to be focusing our efforts on trying to determine how—when the real climate change occurs—we're going to deal with longer periods of intense cold. We can't change the climate, but we can learn to adapt to it as it changes, as long as we don't waste our time, energy, and effort trying to control nature itself.
Update: I don't want to lose my funding! The scientist that was the bais for the
Daily Mail article is challenging their representation of his work. Smart man. You don't bite the hand that feeds you all of that delicious grant money. He would probably come closer to agreeing with this
Telegraph version of events, which will see him safely into retirement.
Attempting to claim that the reality of cooling and the projection of cooling actually supports a long term case for warming is a contortion to make a
Cirque du Soleil gymnast wince, but it is amusing to watch.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:26 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Meanwhile, children are starving while people make up lies about global warming as a scam to steal billions from well-meaning, deceived people. But, of course, scam artists have never cared a thing about the real needs of human beings -they just want to lie, use scare tactics, and want their marks to "show them the money".
Great post. Thanks for your blog, Confed Yank.
Posted by: laura at January 11, 2010 11:36 AM (JFvHi)
2
Spot-on, CY
As I have said in the past, we should really wish that the AGW hypothesis was proven. If true, then climate engineering would be possible.
However, we do not know how to increase the greenhouse effect for the planet. So a true ice age will kill billions and cause vastly more problems than a trivial 2-4 C average temperature increase.
But Gore and Pachauri will still make their money off the AGW fraud...that is all that matters.
Posted by: iconoclast at January 11, 2010 12:09 PM (O8ebz)
3
I knew the present AGW theory was a lie from the very beginning. Yes we are about to re-enter another ice age. Many will die. Unfortunately, everybody you have ever known is going to die, warm or cold. If we cannot limit our population, mother earth (nature) WILL. Human beings should be rare and beautiful flowers in the landscape rather than the plague they have become. They are magic and too much of a good thing corrupts the beauty. Those who survive may look fondly back at the profusion of glory that walked the earth. This is the Garden of Eden.
Posted by: Avery at January 11, 2010 12:42 PM (brIiu)
4
Laura,
I am afraid you have it wrong. You see, I order to get rid of global warming our government is arranging to tax us to a greater extent and give the money to developing countries like China, those in Africa and so on. That should significantly impact the environment.
Posted by: David at January 11, 2010 01:46 PM (VpBDM)
5
Funny .. how "these climate scientists didn't see this cooling coming.
Posted by: Neo at January 11, 2010 02:56 PM (tE8FB)
6
This information is false and misleading. It does not match up with the scientifically settled computer models that predict, with certainty, the temperatures will only rise.
So let AlGore say it, so let it be done.
Posted by: SouthernRoots at January 11, 2010 03:48 PM (FJRFk)
7
Laura said "Meanwhile, children are starving while people make up lies about global warming as a scam"
Laura, the chief irritation is the attempt by the left to blame global warming on human contribution with absolutely no proof. That irritation turns into anger when people realize the Earth has had many ice ages and global warming periods in its long history, and the fact that the blind followers of the left are too intellectually lazy to research the subject.
Another point you liberals seem not to grasp is that global warming could provide more food production and help those starving children you're so concerned about.
Posted by: Rick at January 11, 2010 04:58 PM (GmIEI)
8
I know you will find this hard to believe but I read this morning that this was excatly what the AGW data was predicting and that they are correct. They are saying that the data predicted this cooling and therefore their preditcion of warming in the future is correct also. These people are almost as arrogant as our leader.
Posted by: inspectorudy at January 11, 2010 06:00 PM (Vo1wX)
9
I was wondering one day recently as I was freezing my behind off - wouldn't it be terribly IRONIC that all these years of cuting back "greenhouse gasses" and the wacko libs demanding we reduce carbon dioxide have the opposit effect - making the earth COLDER!!!!
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by: slimedog at January 11, 2010 09:30 PM (Z21cb)
10
iconoclast;
Actually it's easier to do geo-engineering to prevent Ice Ages than to cool the planet. All you need are big mirrors in orbit to increase overall insolation. Those are relatively cheap to build and deploy. There are a number of other schemes, simply look back to the 70s and 80s for the last Ice Age scare.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at January 11, 2010 10:17 PM (yQAOr)
11
Posted by slimedog at January 11, 2010 09:30 PM
Fallen Angel by Jerry Pournelle. A fun read and some pretty decent science as well.
Posted by: iconoclast at January 11, 2010 11:19 PM (O8ebz)
12
What is wrong with you people?
You spend years mocking environmentalists for believing that the climate is changing and the earth is warming up, because you believe the science is shoddy and most of it is simply hysteria.
And now it's all "we're gonna freeze to death" because of an article in the Daily Mail. But as you can see here
http://climateprogress.org/2010/01/11/foxnews-wattsupwiththat-climatedepot-daily-mail-article-on-global-cooling-mojib-latif/
That article is based on misquoting a number of scientists and organizations including Dr. Mojib Latif and the NSIDC.
Wise up. Jesus.
Posted by: Pockmark Notorious at January 12, 2010 08:40 AM (ZGMeu)
13
POCKMARK - I have no idea what you are talking about. Speaking for myself, I do not believe WE are freezing or warming the earth. Key word there is WE! WE can't do squat to control the earth - the WE is us human beings. That realllly big ball of hydrogen in the sky, along with that very hot molten steel in the center of the earth does the job - along with a couple of other things we can't control.
Posted by: slimedog at January 12, 2010 08:11 PM (Z21cb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 08, 2010
Did Abdulmutallab Want to Fail? Eh, No
Most days, I don't think about him at all. Some days, I question his sanity. And then there are days when I have no doubts at all.
Glenn invokes Jane's law.
Yeah... that fits.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:36 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Good article, an a silly argument from Mr. Sullivan, but do you really consider the Easter Uprising a terrorist act. A group of brave patriots trying to liberate their homeland from brutal colonial rule by the British? Do you consider Sam Adams and George Washington terrorists as well?
Just sayin'...
Posted by: Will Butler at January 08, 2010 07:00 PM (LgpMF)
2
There was a point, not sure where it was, where the Irish independence movement was entirely suborned by Marxists. They didn't want to be independent, they wanted to turn Ireland into England's Cuba.
The PIRA of the post WWII era were Marxist terrorists, and should have been suppressed like any Marxist insurgency.
Posted by: Britt at January 10, 2010 03:46 PM (DcWbe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
There Are No Coincidences
A U.S. solider deployed in Afghanistan captured the mastermind of the attack that killed his cousin three years before. When TankerBabe says she got chills hearing this story, I can understand why.
Via
Thunder Run.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:15 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
When the atheists say there is no God...The Big Guy tends to prove them wrong.
Posted by: favill at January 08, 2010 11:41 AM (RU8Qm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wait a Second.. Allahpundit Knows Ray Stevens?
When you read someone long enough, you start to develop the feeling you actually know them to a certain extent, even though you don't actually know the person at all.
Well, Allahpundit through me for a loop this morning.
I never would have expected him to know the first thing about
Ray Stevens, much less
post his video ripping Obamacare:
If I find that AP's a closet fan of
Lewis Grizzard and
Jerry Clower, I just don't know what I'll do.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:54 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Old Ray's video has gone totally VIRAL and the man is singing exactly what the people are saying! Election Day 2010 will be our ONLY opportunity to make our voices heard - finally!!
When the names of those who vote FOR Obama Care is posted; it's time for WE, the people, to "vote you outta' there".
Posted by: Dell at January 08, 2010 11:23 AM (5ppXf)
2
I've noticed that AP is tacking a bit back to the right lately. Maybe Malkin told him to get his act together or get out.
And if not, she should have.
Posted by: Steve at January 08, 2010 12:41 PM (mR0Z5)
3
Thanks for posting that, Bob. I didn't realize Ray Stevens was still singing.
Posted by: MikeM at January 08, 2010 02:11 PM (cnh7/)
4
I didn't know he was still alive. Looks pretty good for a 70 year old. Must be living right.
Posted by: Tim at January 08, 2010 04:30 PM (nc6/K)
5
Haven't heard any of those names in a while, takes me back! Now someone needs to make a video with Junior Samples...
Posted by: Will Butler at January 08, 2010 07:02 PM (LgpMF)
6
Yep watched it again! Sent this to
everyone I know.
Posted by: Marc at January 08, 2010 09:34 PM (Zoziv)
7
Bob, with kindness (meaning no raps across the knuckles with a rule) it's "threw", I believe.
Best regards.
Posted by: Tom at January 09, 2010 05:40 PM (diBNC)
8
The health care bill needs to come across Marcel's talkin' chainsaw.
Posted by: Pinandpuller at January 09, 2010 11:42 PM (07w/N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 07, 2010
St. Louis Workplace Violence: Five Workers Shot, Shooter Commits Suicide
A disgruntled employee of more than 20 years entered the St. Louis branch of ABB Power and shot five others this morning before turning the gun on himself. The shooter, identified as Timothy Hendron, killed at least one of his co-workers. Several others are in serious-to-critical condition.
There is still a lot of confusion/misinformation over what precisely occurred and why, but several accounts indicate that Hendron was part of a class-action benefits lawsuit against his company, though it is unknown if that had any direct impact on today's events.
If anger over the court case is found out to be the proximate cause of the shooting, then it will be the
second shooting this week with such a cause.
Please say a prayer for those affected.
Update: According to police, the suspect killed three ABB workers and wounded 5 others before taking his own life. There is still no word on a motive. The class-action lawsuit of which Hendron was a part was just getting underway this week.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:20 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Globe Columnist Tees Off on Martha Coakley
Ouch. Brian McGrory is not pulling his punches:
If you're a registered voter in Massachusetts, your friendly Democratic Senate candidate, Martha Coakley, is sticking her thumb in your eye.
Coakley, in exquisitely diva-like form, is refusing all invitations to debate her Republican opponent in the race, Scott Brown, unless a third-party candidate with no apparent credentials is included on the stage. She may also require a crystal bowl of orange-only M&Ms in her dressing room, but we haven't gotten that far yet. Her demands have led to an astonishing result: there will be just one -- that's one -- live televised debate in the Boston media market this general election season.
It gets mushy in the middle, but it ends strong.
If the
Globe keeps hammering Coakley, will enough Massachusetts Democrats stay home to give Republican challenger Scott Brown an outside chance of winning Ted Kennedy's old seat? I still find it improbable, but Coakley's ineptitude, a continued withering assault from the typically left-leaning
Globe, and the idea that some make use the race as a referendum against the health care rationing scheme seem to be making what should have been Coakley's race to win race more uncertain every day.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:35 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
this Kansan sent what he could, yea I know, what good does $25 bucks do when it takes millions to win a campaign against Acorn and Seiu. Made me feel good and by golly wouldn't it be great if Teddy's old seat defeated Obamacare?
Posted by: bman at January 08, 2010 11:19 AM (Bnzgl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
White House Refuses to Address Obama Health Care Lie
Shocking, I know.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
06:59 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
No comments on White House no comment? Did we lose the progressives or are they in hiding?
Posted by: Jayne at January 07, 2010 08:20 PM (dwIL0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Was Michael Yon Targeted For Harassment by DHS?
I'm really bad for getting around to this so late, but Michael Yon was hassled at the Seattle airport as he came back after nearly a year overseas:
Got arrested at the Seattle airport for refusing to say how much money I make. (The uniformed ones say I was not "arrested", but they definitely handcuffed me.) Their videos and audios should show that I was polite, but simply refused questions that had nothing to do with national security. Port authority police eve...ntually came -- they were professionals -- and rescued me from the border bullies.
Over at Blackfive, Laughing Wolf wrote about the incident, and someone calling themselves "Johnnie von Bernhardi"
responded back in detail, challenging Yon's account, straight up calling him a liar.
Interestingly enough, von Bernhardi provides Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with a motive:
Yon actually has a history with CBP. His Thai girlfriend got stopped and questioned by CBP and he has a hissy fit afterward.
The "history" they speak of isn't of a problem with Yon passing through customs, but of publishing
this article that detailed the bullying behavior of a CBP officer experience by a friend of Yon's.
And von Bernhardi? He/she posts from a socket-puppet Department of Homeland Security IP address both as
Von Bernhardi and as Nicole on Blackfive.
While there is certain to be another official explanation for their behavior, the DHS sockpuppet makes it clear that CBP was both known to them and on their bad side
before he attempted to re-enter the country.
I'll let you ponder what that may mean on your own.
As for his part, Yon is a fighter. He's challenged DHS to
release the video-tapes of his harassment and may
attempt to file a libel suit against DHS for the comment at Blackfive calling him a liar.
Let me tell you a little about what I know of Michael Yon. We've worked together on several stories in the past, and his concern for accuracy and fairness in reporting is second to none. If I had to weigh his integrity versus that of a person who leaves sock-puppeted comments under multiple aliases in a blog's comments, I'm going with Mike's account all the way, without reservations.
And if Janet Napolitano's DHS is targeting critics for harrassment, they certainly picked the wrong former Green Beret to start in on.
Update: Laughing Wolf says via email that Nicole claims she is not von Bernhardi. Duly noted.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
06:35 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Why is anybody from DHS talking about Yon's previous encounters. There is a such thing as privacy.
Does DHS in DC (the IP Blackfive reported traces into DC) go through official DHS records and post to a blog every time there is a "misunderstanding" at the border ? .. or is every incident transmitted throughout DHS to make them a celebrity ?
Posted by: Neo at January 07, 2010 12:59 PM (tE8FB)
2
More like a motive for Yon to claim bullying and harrassment.
Yon claimed that he doesn't have to answer any questions from CBP officers unless those questions are related to "national security." Well, CBP has responsibilities in addition to national security. CBP also deals with immigration fraud, customs laws, smuggling and other issues. Their duties are more than looking for terrorists.
And, by the way, CBP does not tape in the Federal Inspection Area.
Posted by: Federale at January 07, 2010 07:12 PM (9gRn0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2010
Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie
Barack Obama, via Breitbart, promising on eight separate occasions to televise the health care debate.
Barack Obama is a liar. That isn't a slanderous accusation, just a well-documented fact. It rather makes you wonder what else he may have lied about.
Doesn't it?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:40 AM
| Comments (29)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
This is just another racist attack on our new Leader.
In case you didn't notice, there was an election in November 2008. We won, you lost, and you will never get another chance.
The day of the racist white male opressor has passed. President Obama rules this country now and he will lead us into the light of a new world of justice and peace.
Posted by: Yes We Did at January 06, 2010 12:33 PM (nAohr)
2
come on ... it's not really a lie-lie ... he's simply used his superior intellect to change his mind about a campaign promise ... "For the Greater Good" of course ... funny how the "Greater Good" always requires Obama to break his campaign promises ...
5 days of Public Display prior to signing bills ...
Closing Gitmo in a year ... (thankfully broken)
We will not prosecute CIA interrogators ...
Televise health care negotiations ...
No taxes for those making less than 250K ...
No lobbyists in his admin ...
Campaigned against the individual mandate ...
Promised to only use Public Financing for his campaign ...
End Don't Ask Don't Tell ... (circling the drain)
When almost every campaign promise is broken you start to think the guy knew he wasn't going to honor them and at that point ... making the promise was a lie ...
This means that alot of people are starting to think that Obama is not just lying now but has been lying since 2007-2008 about a great many things ... some of those things caused many of those people to vote for him ...
When you realize that the man has been lying about some of his fundamental beliefs and ideas for so long it shakes you to your core that you were duped. For many people they will never accept this and will rationalize every broken promise. Not to cover for Obama so much as to maintain their own twisted irrational sanity.
Of course the guy has been lying for years. How else can a man with not one legislative or executive achievement in his ENTIRE life get elected first to the Senate and then to the Presidency in a 4 year window. He had to bum rush everyone in order to pull off his con. All cons eventually come unravelled and he needs to keep the pace up to mask the paper thin facade he has erected in front of his life, achievements and most importantly his beliefs and ideas.
He is the Milli Vanilli President ... lip synching as fast as he can hoping the music doesn't stop ...
Posted by: Jeff at January 06, 2010 12:45 PM (B7Wu9)
3
the big "O" was recently on vacation...sorry no time to stop at the dept.of records to pick up a copy of the B.C. Was late to tee off at Wakiki C.C.
Posted by: No Way No How Get Lost at January 06, 2010 12:49 PM (cwBuu)
4
heh Yes We Did ... (assuming you are not being completely sarcastic given your comically childish "racist white male opressor" line)
what makes you think Obama thinks WE (you and him) won ?
I'm certain he knows he won ... just not sure he's onboard with your vision of we ... kind of scary isn't it ? I mean why did you vote for Obama ? closing Gitmo ? end the war in Iraq ? End DADT ? No taxes on those making less than 250K ? Cap 'n Tarde ? ObamaCare ? Post Partisanship ? Post Racial ?
Obama never got away with lying to me, it was people like you he was lying to, those that voted for him.
Posted by: Jeff at January 06, 2010 12:54 PM (B7Wu9)
5
Yes We Did: do youhave anything else to say? It is the same comment over and over.
Posted by: Garrett at January 06, 2010 01:12 PM (DQjJA)
6
When he starts lying about weapons of mass destruction and Al Qaeda connections to start preemptive wars he can't finish, I'll worry.
Posted by: beet at January 06, 2010 01:54 PM (aklb4)
7
No you won't, beet. You'll just shift the goalposts again, and then again, like you do every time he has shown that the political character he played to get himself elected is one that is entirely fictional.
The sad thing is that you don't even realize it as you rationalize it all away, as "this is how things are done." The Obama, or Reid, or Pelosi use the exact same tactics you once screamed were destroying the country, and you vacantly nod your approval.
You're utterly, entirely wedded to a shifting ideology of whatever they tell you is right, and aren't even cognizant of becoming what you claimed you hated.
Baa. Baa. Baa.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 06, 2010 02:13 PM (gAi9Z)
Posted by: Rob Crawford at January 06, 2010 02:24 PM (ZJ/un)
9
Yes We Did said:
"The day of the racist white male opressor has passed"
Slavery was embedded in North America hundreds of years before the USA was formed and in less than 100 years we eradicated it. Unfortunately you probably missed many opportunities by only realizing that fact now.
Yes We Did said:
"President Obama rules this country now"
No President rules.
Posted by: Rick at January 06, 2010 03:08 PM (GmIEI)
10
Most. Ethical. Congress. Ever.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 06, 2010 04:08 PM (kBM/e)
11
Nah. Doesn't make me wonder about a thing. I figure every time he opened his mouth he was lying. That's what Marxists do.
Posted by: Nancy at January 06, 2010 04:20 PM (3TdgB)
12
Obama never lies. He merely makes situational assertions.
Posted by: zhombre at January 06, 2010 05:16 PM (8mdQg)
13
The White Devils' reign is over! We will reverse thousands of years of vile oppression and take back the civilization the Greeks stole from the Africans. This planet is ours! We will exile you ice people to a cold moon of Jupiter.
Posted by: Yes We Done Did Dat at January 06, 2010 05:19 PM (8mdQg)
14
Obama is no Messiah, he is a plain ordinary lying politician.
May he burn in hell.
Posted by: Neo at January 06, 2010 06:55 PM (tE8FB)
15
Solid B+ Barack. The libtards don't care about your lies to get this POS bill passed.
Posted by: daleyrocks at January 06, 2010 07:25 PM (3O5/e)
16
"President Obama rules this country now"
Doesn't that just say it all? How many more of these leftards and loons are just desperately seeking a cult of personality irrespective of 2+ centuries of a republic that abhors such a travesty?
Posted by: iconoclast at January 06, 2010 08:39 PM (O8ebz)
17
CY, by your standard of "lie," every single politician you'll ever find is a liar. I don't expect and never expected O to deliver on every single campaign promise, especially one that concerns the doings of a separate branch of government. He can't control Congress, and anybody who thought that the days of closed-door negotiations would end lives in a dreamworld. Like every politician, he made some campaign promises that he can't or won't keep. I'm not too bothered by it, particularly since the overall transparency of the HCR debate was pretty good.
So, like I said, what bothers me is not when a person doesn't deliver precisely what they promised; the real world is funny about making that impossible sometimes.
And like I said, when I compare the "lie" you're accusing the President of, with the garbage peddled by the Bush administration about the links between Iraq and Al Qaeda, and the fantasies they spun about what America would face if we invaded Iraq, I wanna puke.
Posted by: beet at January 07, 2010 02:38 PM (aklb4)
18
Ah but one other thing - the press and folks like yourself are right to push him on this stuff. My hypothesis would be that the Senators involved refused to allow their internal debates to be televised. At this late date, O doesn't want to rock that boat. We know more or less what the bill will be.
I'm sure some of your readers think the silence is all about slipping in his Marxist amendments - FEMA camps for gun owners and that sort of thing - but I'm willing to bet that they're wrong.
Posted by: beet at January 07, 2010 03:04 PM (aklb4)
19
Excuse me. Barack is a liar? OMG! Who Knew?
Only every one who knows jack about politicians. They cannot but lie. Each and every one of them.
If you see a politician on the road, kill him.
Posted by: Bill Johnson at January 08, 2010 10:18 PM (qKRNd)
20
Beet just invoked the standard Liberal argment that Saddam never had WMDs. Ha. On a post about lying no less.
You're dead wrong. VX is a WMD, you monster. It's not a conventional weapon, like you claim it is.
I remember you. You're the person who threatened to commit mass murder against those who disagree with you, with the exclusion of me.
You should be ashamed and silent, yet you're an ignorant loudmouth. You don't get to point fingers about lying.
I do.
Posted by: brando at January 09, 2010 07:24 PM (LjEkE)
21
We know more or less what the bill will be.
And from what source would that be? If you say Cato, it might be believable. If you say CBO then you are ignorant of the fact that the CBO only can work with the assumptions given it by the Congress. So--garbage in, garbage out. Congress is desperate to pass this bill--so their assumptions are not exactly objective.
what a useful tool you are, beet.
Posted by: iconoclast at January 10, 2010 05:50 PM (7wRwp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Trouble for Coakley in Massachusetts
Before becoming a U.S. Senate candidate that expected to waltz into Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat merely for having a "D" behind her name, Martha Coakley was a prosecutor. The left-leaning Boston Globe is far from content with what would normally be their obvious choice over Republican candidate Scott Brown.
Maybe it's because she seemed so ambivalent about
prosecuting child rapists:
In October 2005, a Somerville police officer living in Melrose raped his 23-month-old niece with a hot object, most likely a curling iron.
Keith Winfield, then 31, told police he was alone with the toddler that day and made additional statements that would ultimately be used to convict him.
But in the aftermath of the crime, a Middlesex County grand jury overseen by Martha Coakley, then the district attorney, investigated without taking action.
It was only after the toddler's mother filed applications for criminal complaints that Coakley won grand jury indictments charging rape and assault and battery.
Even then, nearly 10 months after the crime, Coakley's office recommended that Winfield be released on personal recognizance, with no cash bail. He remained free until December 2007, when Coakley's successor as district attorney won a conviction and two life terms.
Even as an isolated case this looks bad for Coakley, but I could understand how sympathetic people might consider her giving her the benefit of the doubt for having a bad case. OH, if it were only one bad case. But Winfield wasn't the first rapist she'd been soft on.
As
Jules Crittenden notes, Coakley was also the prosecutor who allowed John Geoghan, the poster boy for Catholic priest pedophilia, to secretly plead to a probation deal in 1995.
Geoghan molested at least 130 victims before finally being sentenced to prison.
I'm sure that there are voters in Massachusetts who can hold their nose, find a comfortable rationalization, and cast a vote for Coakley knowing her past.
But I imagine there quite a few more that now look on her with richly deserved suspicion.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:58 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
here's another example of what a statist weasil she is.
she seems to be all about misdirected compassion for evil doers and harsh response for the righteous.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
This Is Unbelievable...Not
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, talking about criticizing the father who punched out the guy he caught molesting his 4-year-old son in a supermarket men's room (and, who was subsequently arrested for his morally just actions).
"All I'm saying is that...we really try and discourage people from self-help."
Up yours, you arrogant, condescending, authoritarian bitch!
Fuck you and every other fascist scumbag down in Massachusetts, suckling from the taxpayers' teat, masquerading as faithful servants of the public trust, whilst bending over to make life as comfortable as possible for the most reprehensible breed of subhuman filth walking our streets.
I pray that some day, should you find yourself in a similar situation, needing to indulge in a little "self-help", you have the wherewithal to step down off your high horse and comply with your own oppressive, authoritarian dogma, and surrender yourself to the next piece of garbage, lowlife predator looking to treat you like a slab of beef."
http://massbackwards.blogspot.com/2008/07/this-is-unbelievablenot.html
Posted by: rumcrook¾ at January 06, 2010 11:14 AM (60WiD)
2
I'd have a little more sympathy for her had she not kept an innocent man in prison for years on false molestation charges. Read Ann Coulter's article on that situation!
I hope that there are enough people in MA who realize that she deos NOT need to be rewarded for this sort of behavior with a Senate position.
If they can't bring themselves to vote Republican, (and they are mighty, mighty Blue up there!) I hope they at least stay home.
Posted by: MissTammy at January 06, 2010 02:56 PM (GXLjK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obama: Screw You, America, And Screw Transparency. Let's Ram Through This Bill
The veneer has shattered. Despite pleas from America (and the media) to keep his word, President Obama is calling for House and Senate Democrats to ram through Obamacare in a panicked rush:
President Barack Obama is prodding House and Senate Democrats to get him a final health care bill as soon as possible, encouraging them to bypass the usual negotiations between the two chambers in the interest of speed.
Obama delivered the message at an Oval Office meeting Tuesday evening with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his No. 2, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., joined in by phone.
They agreed that rather than setting up a formal conference committee to resolve differences between health bills passed last year by the House and Senate, the House will work off the Senate's version, amend it and send it back to the Senate for final passage, according to a House leadership aide, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to discuss the private meeting.
Obama himself will take a hands-on role, convening another meeting with congressional leaders at the White House on Wednesday, the aide said.
The aim is to get a final bill to Obama's desk before the State of the Union address sometime in early February.
Nationwide, Democrats are
dropping like flies, with two U.S. Senators and governor dropping out of planned re-election bids within the past 24 hours. This is presumably due to a combination of the bullying political tactics of the Democratic leadership for radical and rushed pork-laden expenditures, and the realization that their constituents are sick and tired of unethically-purchased and tyrannical legislation.
The Obama Administration and Democratic Congress have abandoned the concept of "representative" democracy, in that they have no interest in listening to the overwhelming majority of Americans who do not want this bill rushed through recklessly. As we are all painfully aware, health care comprises 20% of our national economy, and any legislation concerning it deserves careful and open deliberation to make sure that it meets the needs of the American people, without it being an undue burden on future generations.
It becomes more apparent with every passing day, however, that the radical leaders of the Democratic Party have no interest in making laws that help the American people. They are only interested in usurping as much power as they can for themselves.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:07 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I think the term is "kamikaze legislation". The Democratic party rightly perceives that support is waning for their most cherished Left Wing beliefs and they are attempting to pack the bureaucracy with legislation before they are shown the door. The smarter ones are retiring. Don't be surprised if Chris Dodd retires to someplace warm and sunny that has no extradition treaty with the U.S.
Posted by: Jerry in Detroit at January 06, 2010 10:38 AM (QZ1OQ)
2
Take your medicine and shut up!
Posted by: gorightgirl at January 06, 2010 10:43 AM (eGGg8)
3
I bet the departing Dems are getting bankster golden parachutes ala Goldman Sachs, etc. They're getting paid to "retire" now so that Dems who aren't clearly part of the establishment that destroyed the USA can then lie, cheat, bully, and steal their way into office - without the smell of the despite Americans have for this awful government.
However, the same mobster banksters would own the new Dems just like they owned Dodd and crew.
We're dealing with literal organized criminals.
Posted by: laura at January 06, 2010 03:59 PM (JFvHi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 70 >>
Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.1057 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.0878 seconds, 127 records returned.
Page size 98 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.