Ogre's Politics & Views
October 13, 2005
Iredell Voters Support Higher Taxes
The election results are in. Voters in Iredell County have decided that they want to attempt to compete with neighboring Mecklenburg County by spending as much money as quickly as they can.
Voters supported two massive bond issues -- over $60 million to spend on, well, whatever the government wants to spend it on. These same voters must have gotten a government-provided education, because none of them seem to understand that governments have to pay that money back -- and the ONLY way government gets money is by taking it from productive, working citizens.
This will likely cost an average household in Iredell county just over $1,000 a year in extra taxes. Thank you voters, mostly Republican. I SO wish there was a home for small government conservatives.
Posted by: Ogre at
10:06 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Big Miers News
Have you heard the latest BIG Miers news? Other candidates didn't want to be considered and withdrew their names.
Is it really that slow of a news day for these people? OF COURSE they did! Would you want to sit in front of the morons that make up the Senate Judiciary committee and tell them where to go? Ok, well maybe you would, and that's why YOU didn't get nominated.
Politics is ugly -- really, really, really ugly. Anyone whose name pops up there IS going to be viciously attacked. Their entire family will be attacked by special interest groups. Planned Parenthood and their criminals will be searching or making up anything they want to about you if you ever considered NOT performing an abortion.
Staffers from Democrat Senator's offices will be hired to steal confidential information about you and every financial transaction you ever were involved in during your entire lifetime.
While the temptation to tell all those Senators where they can go will be incredibly great, you will have to swallow the bile that those idiots will be forcing up and smile and answer the questions they ask.
I'm not surprised some people withdrew their names -- I'm surprised there's anyone LEFT willing to put up with that circus.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:05 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Jay at October 13, 2005 11:52 AM (Nvpqu)
2
No, no! Stop the presses! This is REALLY big news! (yes, I am TRYING not to laugh...)
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 11:55 AM (/k+l4)
3
LOL...yes BIG news BUT you have a point...one day no one will want to serve their country via politics. THEN WHAT? who will be our reps?
hehe I will...
Posted by: Raven at October 14, 2005 06:05 AM (sfJOm)
4
I don't know. Only those who are part of the system is my bet. It's more and more becoming less of a representation thing and more of a career thing. And that's sad.
Posted by: Ogre at October 14, 2005 06:41 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Romney in '08?
Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney was campaigning touring wandering through North Carolina this past week, making speeches. I'm not really sure why a sitting governor of a northeastern state is speaking to citizens subjects peons in North Carolina, but here he was.
He at least appears to have a clue. When speaking of terrorists:
[They're] not just intent on blowing up a little bomb here and there at a shopping mall. Awful as that would be, they want to bring down our government, bring down our entire economy. They want to put in place a huge theocracy.
At least he realizes that we're at war and simply calling the local sheriff isn't going to make this war on terrorism stop. He also seems to understand basic economics, unlike any elected Democrats in North Carolina:
It just kills jobs to raise taxes
He may not be a social conservative (he's from Massachusetts), but he certainly scores points for fiscal conservatism: when he took office just 2 years ago, the state budget was $3 billion in the hole. They now have a surplus.
I'm not supporting his campaign just yet, but he sure sounds miles better than Hillary vs. McCain.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:01 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hi Ogre, Michele sent me!
Posted by: bec at October 13, 2005 07:58 AM (h5Aca)
2
Well hello and welcome! Thanks for stopping along!
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 08:38 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 12, 2005
Merry Ramadan!
The Alliance is putting together a party to help celebrate Ramadan, and they're looking for ideas to celebrate the terrorist high holy day.

EXPLOSIONS!
That's how you celebrate terrorist holy months, isn't it?
I'm sorry.
That was insensitive of me. How about a snack?

What? Oh. Is this better?

mmMMMmmm...BBQ...
Posted by: Ogre at
08:59 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Where's the chitlins? And some hush puppies cooked in fatback?
Posted by: William Teach at October 12, 2005 09:26 PM (eSZb/)
2
That's real sensitive. There are more Muslims on this planet than there are Christians. MOST of them are peaceful. Very few of them are terrorists.
Islam is to terrorism as Christianity is to the KKK... you just let your ass show in public. Educate yourself, Sir.
Posted by: abbiapple at October 13, 2005 02:36 AM (JDoKq)
3
How does one celebrate Ramadan?
Why, by going to a very special event, of course. (this information is posted here solely as an irritant to the coward abbiapple in the previous comment)
Fatwa Productions
in association with
Jihad Entertainment
present the
2006 Islamarama Peace Tour
Join speakers from your favorite terrorist groups including
Hamas
Hezbollah
Al-Quada
The ACLU
Code Pink
The DNC
The Democratic Underground
and more as they tell you all about the
Religion of Peace and Pieces
Special appearances by Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore and Markos Moulitsas from Daily Kos and hosted by Bill and Hillary
Explosive entertainment provided by musical guests such as the
Italian Muslim Crooner Don Ramadan with his chart-topping love ballad "I love you more than I love my goat" and the
Islamic Rock group The Infidels with their sky-rocketing single "La-la-la-la-la"
Special appearance by the Gitmo Crew preforming their number one club mix
"Whoosh Goes the Book"
The 2006 Islamarama Peace Tour kicks off in Mecca, with stops in Medina, Mosul, Fallujah, Baghdad, Tehran and Jarkarta
For tickets call 1-555-EXPLODE
The 2006 Islamarama Peace Tour....
"It'll Blow You AWAY!!!!"
And THAT is EXACTLY how one should celebrate ramadan!!!!!
Posted by: kender at October 13, 2005 03:40 AM (ss3AH)
4
Chitlins? William, this is a potluck celebration -- you can bring them!
abi-abdul-apple -- if I haven't offended someone, my mission for the day is not complete. Most days just waking up, I'm sure offends SOMEONE.
Kender, can I bring my BBQ pork to the party? I'll bring enough for everyone!
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 05:25 AM (iJFc9)
5
I'm thinking complimentary spa day at an "all pork all the time" location? Say - the U.S. Government?
And to the freak above who left the comment, yes there are a bunch of muslims all over the world, but you are wrong, they are not all peaceful. Many rejoiced when the U.S. was attacked, and it wasn't just terrorists! So stick it in yer . . .
Posted by: oddybobo at October 13, 2005 08:18 AM (6Gm0j)
6
"All Pork All the Time?" I am THERE!
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 08:44 AM (/k+l4)
7
Round my house and with my friends we call bacon the national patriotic food, makes us feel not so bad bout eating as much of it as we do. mmmm, love pork.
Posted by: -[Medic]- at October 13, 2005 10:22 AM (8WHfy)
8
One of the other (few) benefits of living in North Carolina -- lots and lots of BBQ pork!
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 10:26 AM (/k+l4)
9
Go to heck, you racist pig. You deserve to get blown up by a jihadist.
Posted by: Daedalus at October 13, 2005 09:05 PM (r2uH4)
10
Thanks for stopping by, terrorist supporter!
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 09:06 PM (iJFc9)
11
Pigs are racist?
But they're so sweet and tasty!
Posted by: Harvey at October 15, 2005 06:42 PM (ubhj8)
12
There's no rule saying you cannot be racist AND tasty at the same time!!!
Posted by: Ogre at October 15, 2005 06:45 PM (iJFc9)
13
Oh, that's really mature. I served my country in the Army, stood up for what's right on many occasion in the face of racist assholes like you, lost three friends to an IED explosion (in Iraq) who were also serving their country, and who understood the difference between Muslims and terrorists. (A concept, which, your uneducated, redneck ass will never comprehend.) What have you done, other than run your ignorant mouth? Have you ever had to fire a weapon at a human being? Who's the fucking coward now?
Posted by: abbiapple at October 29, 2005 01:10 AM (wXYhD)
14
I'm not really sure who you're addressing with your comment, Anniapple. In case you're addressing me, I'll provide answers. What have I done? Served my country as a US Marine. Have I ever had to fire a weapon? Unfortunately, yes, I have.
Posted by: Ogre at October 30, 2005 08:13 PM (7PCNv)
15
No, Ogre, while I find your views and politics offensive... that last comment wasn't directed at you. It was a retort to Kender's comment about me being a coward.
Posted by: abbiapple at November 22, 2005 06:37 PM (tquL9)
16
Ah, glad to get that straight, Abbiapple!

Posted by: Ogre at November 22, 2005 08:29 PM (uSCkp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Daniel Craig = Bond?
I have to admit it -- I'm a huge Bond fan. I absolutely love the movies -- I've seen every one more than once, I've got all of them on DVD, and when TNT or TBS have their "month of bond," I watch every single one again. There's none that I really dislike.
If I had to pick my least favorite ones, they'd have to be the Roger Moore years. The Voo-doo stuff from Live and Let Die was a bit too weird for me. The whole time Roger Moore did Bond, I never really liked his "hands off" attitude.
Pierce Brosnan, IMO, was an absolutely excellent Bond. He displayed the perfect attitude and appearance of what Bond should be. However, he's in his 50s now, and I guess the folks that make such decisions really decided that he was too old.
The new bond, the 21st movie, is going to feature a new Bond and
word is that it will be one Daniel Craig.
I know nothing at all about this fellow. I've never heard of him. Browsing some picture galleries, it appears that he's got the "appropriate" British look to make it as bond -- but he's blond. If he's got a little English accent and they dye his hair, I think he'll be fine -- I just REALLY hope they don't cast him in the movie as a blond.
Now all I have to do is sit and patiently twiddle my thumbs until they release the movie...what do you mean, "They have to film it first?" Well, only 7 months until
Mi:III.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:02 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
As a huge James Bond fan, I have to agree that Brosnan was a good Bond. I think Sean Connery was better, but not by much.
I don't know anything about this guy either, hopefully he's not crappy. As for him being blonde.... yea they can dye that.
Posted by: Contagion at October 12, 2005 05:02 PM (Q5WxB)
2
I just hope they DO dye it and don't try to pass blonde off as the "new" Bond.
And I agree with the comparison between Brosnan and Connery, too!
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 05:06 PM (iJFc9)
3
It's tough for me to find agreement, being an older cuss who's actually read, reread and thouroughly enjoyed all the Bond novels written by Ian Fleming. There were no jet packs or motorcycles bearing rocket pods, there was actually a lot less violence and 007 had an occasional problem, like waking up with hangovers and regretting losing money gambling the night before, etc. Sean Connery lived up to the Bond in the books "to a tee," perhaps more whimsical but Bond nonetheless.
I found it hard to get into Moore as Bond, because he had made such a perfect{again, by the book} Simon Templar -- The Saint.
George Lazenby was an okay Bond, though it was difficult to give a flying f--- one way or another with him playing opposite Diana Rigg, and I thought Timothy Dalton was the worst Bond of the lot.
Pierce Brosnan, IMHO, comes in second behind Connery.
Anybody know the name of the actor who played in the most James Bond films?
Posted by: Seth at October 12, 2005 05:44 PM (eZ9l+)
4
I prefer Brosnan. My hubby asked me one time which romantic movie I wanted at Blockbusters... and we ended up with a Bond movie. He almost got some yucky mushy movie. Phew... glad he asked.
Posted by: vw bug at October 12, 2005 05:46 PM (MNp8q)
5
I like Brosnan best; I can see Bond in him in so many other roles... but just can't imagine the guy who played Alex in Tomb Raider being James Bond. I mean, there are standards!

Posted by: pam at October 12, 2005 06:36 PM (l6NIn)
6
Ok, Seth, you've got me with the books.
And I've got to guess the actor with the most movies HAS to be Q...dang, what's his name...
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 06:48 PM (iJFc9)
7
Is that Daniel Craig, Pam? I've never seen that one.
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 06:49 PM (iJFc9)
8
I loved Brosnan as Bond, but I loved him BEFORE he became Bond. He's a hotty.
Posted by: Bou at October 12, 2005 10:23 PM (5JHEt)
9
Bou, did you see him in Remington Steele?
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 05:26 AM (iJFc9)
Posted by: Bou at October 13, 2005 01:02 PM (5JHEt)
11
You're dating yourself...
But it was a pretty cool show, wasn't it? I loved it.
Posted by: Ogre at October 13, 2005 01:33 PM (/k+l4)
12
Soon as I posted my comment... I had that same exact thought. *grin*
Posted by: Bou at October 13, 2005 09:57 PM (5JHEt)
13
Wait. You're not THAT many years behind me then! heh heh heh!
Posted by: Bou at October 13, 2005 09:58 PM (5JHEt)
14
I... Uh... I was watching from within the womb?

Posted by: Ogre at October 14, 2005 05:38 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BloggerWorld
Interesting. This week's Christian Views Symposium takes another look at an article that talks about views of the New York Times' regarding the expansion of blogging -- including the idea that 80,000 new blogs are created EVERY DAY (and why aren't they all submitted to the New Blog Showcase?).
Based on this incredible expansion and use of a relatively new technology, Lennie asks:
What do you see happening if everyone becomes a blogger?
Posted by: Ogre at
12:44 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Me? I'm thinking that there would be a lot of people without jobs!
Posted by: oddybobo at October 12, 2005 04:43 PM (6Gm0j)
2
Gotta agree with that, Oddybobo.
A few things about all these blogs being created. I think most end up being rarely, if ever, updated. They aren't discovered, they do not do the work to get noticed, etc, and then they give up.
Also, you get all these pro writers doing them. SOme. like Michelle M, do a great job fitting in. Then you have the bad ones, such as Keith Oberlman (bloggerman my azz!), ones at ESPN that are subscription content, ones that do not hit the mark, etc.
No one is taking my Mammal status away!
Posted by: William Teach at October 12, 2005 07:34 PM (eSZb/)
3
Yeah, 80,000 a day sounded pretty high -- then I realized I have about six sitting around, not doing anything, that are test beds and the like...
But if EVERYONE had one? Wow. Someone would HAVE to get paid, wouldn't they? I call first in line!
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 08:34 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Feds to Raise Taxes
Soon we shall see if this President Bush will follow in his father's footsteps and agree to raise taxes. His "tax advisory panel" is discussing which taxes to raise, and how much to raise them.
Democrat Vice Chairman John Breaux says:
We have a concept. We know where to go. We just don't have the details.
And that concept is to raise taxes.
Oh sure, they're not selling it as a tax increase. And sure, they're going with the old standby of class warfare (it only affects the rich) -- but any time the government takes more of my money, that's a tax increase, no matter what anyone else wants to call it.
Connie Mack, alleged Republican, sent mixed messages by claiming to not want a value-added tax and yet asking staff to create a proposal that includes a value-added tax.
If you see a value-added tax, RUN! Value-added tax is the most insidious tax there can be because consumers will not see the tax -- government will get increased income, prices will rise, but consumers will think businesses are raising prices for profit.
Damn, whatever happened to the
Fair Tax? Unfortunately, this "panel" will not consider good ideas like that one: They rejected a fundamental overhaul of the tax code, clearly claiming that they like the current tax system.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:32 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Charlotte City Council Continues Anti-Freedom
So, in case you're wondering what's being considered by the Charlotte city government, here's the two "big items" from Monday night's council meeting:
1. Punish people who obey the law and attempt to reduce crime.
2. Fine people who buy alarm systems for their homes.
Could the council actually do any more to support criminals? Seriously! This city council is honestly doing all they can to
increase the already high crime rate in Charlotte. But of course, they simply refuse to admit there are actually any crimes committed in Charlotte.
For issue #1, the council considered banning handguns in the city, except for those who seek and receive approval from the Sheriff. The police chief sees a need to "deal with firearms." I think perhaps he's feeling threatened, and perhaps he should feel that way. I wonder if revolt can be too far away in Charlotte (although I fear it's very far away).
Democrat Warren Turner was honestly worried that people in Charlotte might find out that they can carry guns because the issue was being discussed. I couldn't make up crap that good. The councilman is actually scared that people might discover they have rights. Can someone send this moron to Cuba, please? Hey Mr. Turner, I've got rights and YOU can't have them!
On issue #2, the city wants to add a tax to be charged to anyone who dares to install an alarm system in their home. No, this is not a tax or fine for false alarms, this is a simple tax on you for DARING to install an alarm, since as the almighty council knows, there's no crime in Charlotte and you don't need an alarm.
The results of both issues? Postponed all voting until after the November 8 election where all seats are up for election. What a shocker.
Posted by: Ogre at
04:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
October 11, 2005
Bush attacks South America
*** BREAKING NEWS ***
Dateline: Lima, Peru.
U.S. President, warmonger, and unilateralist George Bush used his weather machine this week to
begin draining the Amazon River. The 4,075-mile long river's water flow has been drastically reduced to less than 424,000 cubic feet per second by Bush's war machine.
The Amazon River flows through the countries of Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Venezuela, and Brazil. The lower river levels are causing problems with transport and economics on the river, which is the main form of transportation in these countries.
Researcher Jean-Louis LeFrenchie postulates that Haliburton is about to go into production with a low-water-level boat that can be used to transport goods in water that is very shallow and Haliburton is already in negotiation with the various tribes of the region to start selling them these boats. Negotiations were weak until the river level started dropping.
The Brazilian government's National Institute of Meteorology said dry weather in the Amazon is linked to warmer Pacific Ocean surface temperatures, which changes rainfall patterns, which may actually be the real reason that the water levels are dropping.
Also of note is the fact that while the river's level is the lowest "on record," there are only 36 years of records that have been kept.
*** END BREAKING NEWS ***
So, how am I doing? Is this FMSM journalism material, or what?
Posted by: Ogre at
05:04 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Not to worry. I understand Bush will be awarding a multi-billion-dollar no-bid contract to Haliburton so that they can fix the climate. They have the whole story over at the Huffington Post, they're just holding it back for the proper time.
Posted by: Ferdinand T. Cat at October 12, 2005 02:58 AM (BDDic)
2
But then all the climate problems will go away -- and everyone knows that Bush and Republicans only MAKE problems, not solve them...
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 06:54 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carnival of Liberty
It's up at Combs Spouts Off. This is my current absolute favorite of all carnivals because it highlights freedom and liberty from all over the blogosphere. If you only read one carnival a week, this is the one you really should be reading if you like freedom (and not just because I finally remembered to enter).
Carnival of Liberty #15
Posted by: Ogre at
02:09 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
HomeSpun Blogger Symposium
Time again for the weekly feature of the Homespun Blogger Symposium... Oops. It seems Major Dad 1984 didn't have time to post a symposium this week. That's okay, as we'll just make up our own, based on his writings.
He's got a pretty good
excuse, if you ask me. Something about catching the Asian Bird Flu or something, I wasn't really paying attention...

I think he recovered nicely as he
went for BBQ soon thereafter (and yes, I am jealous).
So, in honor of MajorDad1984's sickness, today's Homespun Symposium will be about sickness! (And there was much rejoicing):
What was the worst sickness/illness/disease YOU ever contracted?
Posted by: Ogre at
11:05 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Flu & chicken pox (but not at the same time). Let's hope the H5N1 avian flu doesn't mutate into a human vector because that could be worse.
Posted by: cube at October 11, 2005 01:49 PM (9NjQ4)
2
The flu can be pretty bad, but yes, that avian flu will be beyond comprehension.
Thanks for stopping by!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 02:03 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
1,000,000 PEOPLE DEAD!
Well, did that make you read this post? I'm just in training to be a member of the FMSM (Formerly Mainstream Media). I'm noticing more and more that to "report" in the media, you must do quite literally anything to get people to read the articles, even if it means being totally misleading or lying.
For example, take
this headline from the Fox News website:
Records Show Miers Owned Gun Without License
Now, what is your first reaction to reading that headline? What do you think that story will be about? I'm sorry, whatever you were thinking, you're wrong.
Clearly, the author of the headline is implying that Miers owned a gun illegally, by having a gun without a license. However, it is not until the 4th paragraph of the story that the author finally admits that there is actually no such thing as a license to own a gun!
The entire first portion of the article is clearly slanted towards making Miers sound like a bad person because she owned a gun, but didn't have a concealed carry permit (which Texas allows because Texas is evil).
Then, after the article finally admits that there is absolutely nothing wrong with owning a gun without a license that doesn't even exist, it wanders on and talks about personal correspondence between Bush and Miers when she was chairman of the Texas Lottery Commission.
Sometimes I don't know why I even bother reading any news reports -- I might as well be reading the tabloids. Then again, I guess that's why blogs are so powerful today -- it's the only media that might actually tell the truth.
UPDATE: The wonders of the web -- the story headline has been modifed. I've got a screen shot of the original, however:
Posted by: Ogre at
08:04 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
That is called Creative Writing...they have classes for that.
Posted by: Michael at October 11, 2005 10:49 AM (JUnMB)
2
I dunno about that -- looks a little too intentional for that...but then again, don't you think in the creative writing classes they TELL these people who want to be reporters that they're not supposed to make up news?
Never mind, the course is most likely: Creative Writing 211: Making up News for Profit.
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 10:56 AM (/k+l4)
3
Next, they'll be saying she is a thesbian.
Posted by: Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 12:23 PM (090nn)
4
Yep, this is Journalism 101:
When Journalistic Integrity Meets With Political Agenda, Truth Gets Lost in Translation (title of an article I wrote last year for ChronWatch). I thought the title was catchy - but more and more I believe it's truth.
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 12:38 PM (ywZa8)
5
And an UNREGISTERED Thesbian, Soldier's Dad! Thanks for stopping along.
I wonder if it's a two-week course, or an entire Semester, LeftBrainFemail.

Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 12:57 PM (/k+l4)
6
Interesting. I own a gun, but do not possess any licenses or permits. As long as I don't carry it in public, I am not breaking any laws.
I am, however, evil according to the FMSM.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 12, 2005 10:37 AM (K+h36)
7
Yes, you are evil.
And it's interesting living near a state border. When I used to drive from NC to SC for work, I refused to (and still do) get permission to arm myself. In NC I could ONLY carry the gun in public -- to carry it hidden was a crime. But then when I drove over the border, I would have to hide the weapon, because carrying it in plain sight was a crime, while carrying it hidden was fine.
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 10:58 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Workers Compensation for Millionaires
Nice. The minimum salary for a player in the NFL is $230,000.00. That's for rookies. The average number of years of experience for a player in the NFL is 5 years. The minimum salary for a player with 5 years of experience is $540,000. Now, which of you would say that these players need cash government help?
If you think these people do not need government cash, you are not qualified to be a judge in North or South Carolina. You see, numerous judges in those states think that the state worker compensation funds should be used to pay those players who are injured.
Yes, that's correct -- the judges
are ruling that just because someone signs a contract for employment as a professional football player, they do not give up "their rights to worker compensation."
I'm sorry, I missed that right. Tell me again how and why someone is entitled to money simply because they were injured? Rolf Blizzard says it best:
"Is that what workers' comp was intended to do?" he asked. "It really is a fundamental question of what you think workers' comp should be."
Gee, is there anyone else besides myself that isn't simply entitled to government cash? Am I the ONLY person working to support everyone else?
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Nope, I worked for years to support everyone as well.
Posted by: vw bug at October 11, 2005 08:02 AM (mD8Rg)
2
Thank goodness I'm not the only one!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:21 AM (/k+l4)
3
I have worked since I was 16 and never once have I asked nor taken any type of assistance from the government.
Then again, I also don't think there would be a situation harsh enough for me to ask for assistance. I've always been one of those proud/self provider people.
Posted by: Contagion at October 11, 2005 08:59 AM (Q5WxB)
4
O.K., that's three of us that are actually working for what they earn...
(And I'm with you, Contagion, I don't WANT government help).
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 10:00 AM (/k+l4)
5
You see, Ogre, if they didn't provide worker's comp to football players, they'd face charges of discrimination. It's typical Liberalism eating itself alive.
Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 12, 2005 10:40 AM (K+h36)
6
And that's their exact argument -- it wouldn't be fair to not give the millionaires their share of tax money.
Posted by: Ogre at October 12, 2005 10:58 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2005
Words Mean Things
Want to know more about the enemy in the war on terror? Go read this post. It will let you know a little more about how the terrorists think.
Posted by: Ogre at
09:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Carnival, carnival!
Time for more carnival links on this wonderful (rainy) Columbus Day.
First up, the wonderful and always exciting
Tarheel Tavern. This week the host is Nothing Could Be Finer and he posts
the 33rd Carnival with the "special days" theme quite well.
The
Tarheel Tavern is a weekly blog carnival simply from people in North Carolina. It's really different from most carnivals, as most carnivals center around one topic. This one is based on physical location, so you read all sorts of different topics and ideas.
Head on over.
Next up is the
New Blog Showcase Carnival. This week's host is
Dave's Not Here. He brings us the
carnival and provides new blogs that didn't even submit themselves. Now that's how to host a carnival.
Keep in mind the New Blog Showcase Carnival is there to show you and introduce you to the newest blogs. Read it and visit -- these are new blogs that might be waiting for YOUR comment! (And do you like the new, silly, layout of the
main site?)
Finally, there's a new carnival that might interest you, the
Carnival of True Liberties. There's a big pile of links there to various blogs that point out the losses of liberties in this country today. Head on over and read that one, too.
Posted by: Ogre at
02:04 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
We Need A Fence
80% of the people of the United States, according to polls, support building a fence along the border between America and Mexico. So why isn't there a fence there? As always, follow the money (and power).
For example, here in North Carolina, you may freely vote in any election in the state if you are here illegally -- including federal elections and presidential elections. Yes, you read that correctly -- any person can enter North Carolina and vote for the President of the United States without fear of prosecution for breaking the law.
How? An unintended consequence of the Motor Voter act. North Carolina has the most relaxed rules for getting driver's licenses, and the motor voter act automatically registers anyone who gets a driver's license to vote. So enter illegally, head to North Carolina, get free stuff, and vote.
A group has
proposed building a
fence (or wall) along the border. To complain about the cost is silly because we're losing hundreds of billions of dollars already to illegals, so to spend a few billion to stop these criminals only makes sense.
So why won't we build one? Oh, right -- power, money, and votes. Many politicians are scared that if they support building a fence to enforce the law that they will lose the illegal alien vote. Morons (the politicians, not the aliens).
If a few conservative representatives and senators (are they any?) would stand up and demand a fence, they would receive a very large amount of support from the vast majority of American people. Then again, that would require guts, something surely lacking in large amounts in Washington these days.
Posted by: Ogre at
11:02 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Nice piece on the border issue! It seems that Americans have woken up the the problem, but the politicians will be willing to sleep through it, hoping they can lure the "new voters" to their sides.
As Karl would say, "Un-frickin'believable!"
Posted by: Libercontrarian at October 10, 2005 03:25 PM (qX/FK)
2
Why in the world would the conservatives buld a fence to keep illegals out, when big, and some small businesses makes tons of money employing the illegals without having to pay them fair wages, or benifits. The politicans who run this country are not going to do anything to piss off their corporate sponsers, and there fore will not give anything, to stop illegal immigration, except lip service.
Posted by: Leo at October 10, 2005 03:51 PM (BFfUN)
3
Good luck in making this happen.
Posted by: Jack at October 10, 2005 03:52 PM (aFawc)
4
Thanks for stopping by, everyone!
Libercontrarian & Jack, yes, it's insane that so many people want their representatives to do something, yet nothing is getting done.
Leo, the only part of your rant that's right is that no politicians will stop illegals -- no liberals will do or so anything. No Republicans will do or say anything. It's not for the businesses, it's for the power and money.
You see, if there are illegals taking money in the form of government benefits, then government gets control over those people and gets to spend money on them -- and that's why they won't stop it, not because of businesses.
Posted by: Ogre at October 10, 2005 04:35 PM (iJFc9)
5
Okay, ya got me! I'm joining the blogburst - I've had a post running around in my brain for several days and so I've finally written it . . .
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 08:07 AM (M7kiy)
6
Awesome, welcome aboard!
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:21 AM (/k+l4)
7
Whoa! Just noticed that I mis-typed my blog address (several days ago, probably) so my link was bad. femail does not equal female, LOL - musta been thinking of a bunch of packages I had to mail!
Posted by: leftbrainfemale at October 11, 2005 08:45 AM (M7kiy)
8
I'm sure there's something Freudian in there...
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 08:51 AM (/k+l4)
9
But, according to the 9/11 Commission, none of the 9/11 hijackers entered the United States by crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, and all of them had visas issued by the US State Department. According to a staff report from the commission, some of the 19 hijackers entered the US several times, always through US airports. The report said, on pages 7 and 8, that the first hijacker flew in through Los Angeles International Airport on Jan. 15, 2000. " All others entered through 8 airports on the East Coast, including 11 entries through New York area airports and 12 through Florida airports." One would-be hijacker, Mohamed al Kahtani, tried to fly in through Orlando but was turned away when he aroused suspicions of an alert Immigration official and later became hostile and gave evasive answers when interrogated.
Posted by: o o at October 26, 2005 10:44 AM (VxJec)
10
Thanks for stopping by, o o --
but I'm concerned also about the millions of other illegals taking tax money and voting without even being citizens.
Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2005 10:55 AM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Whining Not Just American
It seems whining that everything be given to you on a silver platter is not just an American phenomenon. People in India have joined the chorus in demanding that the rest of the world give them whatever they feel they need because of a natural disaster.
"All the government people, the press people, they are just driving past," said one complainer. Another whined, "No one has come to help us."
What has happened to people? Why is there absolutely no responsibility for anything taken by anyone? Are there no "Real Men" left on the entire planet?
Hey Farid Khan, how about getting up off your rear and volunteering to help others yourself? You have time to talk to the press and demand help, but no time to actually help? Syad Hassan, stop taking time to block roads and force journalists to turn around and start building shelters!
Look, this might sound harsh, but hey folks, this is the real world! IT'S NOT SAFE! YOU ARE NOT GUARANTEED SAFETY IN THIS WORLD!
On the other hand, maybe it's just me. I just know that if I were in the middle of a natural disaster (and I have been), I wouldn't even be talking to the press -- I'd be too busy trying to ensure everyone was safe and had food, water, and shelter myself, without asking, much less demanding, anyone else do anything.
Posted by: Ogre at
08:03 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I have the water in the bleach bottles stashed in the garage, and a pantry full of food! Is it just us folks on the right who believe in self-reliance?
Posted by: DagneyT at October 10, 2005 11:33 AM (9uEBP)
2
That's why I ask -- is it just the minority that's self-reliant, or is it a very silent majority?
Posted by: Ogre at October 10, 2005 11:57 AM (/k+l4)
3
It's not a right or left thing. I know plenty on the left that are prepared for a hurricane. Those of us who live in 'cane country are prepared. We aren't silent about it either.
But our attitude is we're gonna take a hit... just the question of when.
I think the Average American who does not live under the threat of natural disaster (tornadoes, hurricanes, fire) are not prepared for anything. It is the minority that is. For sure.
Posted by: Bou at October 11, 2005 12:04 PM (5JHEt)
4
That's why I mention it -- EVERYONE is under the threat of a natural disaster: http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2005/10/10/acts-of-god/
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 12:56 PM (/k+l4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Go To Space!
Have you been encouraged lately to start your career in science, technology, and mathematics? If you're in North Carolina, perhaps you just haven't been paying attention. Of course, if you're anywhere else in the country, you're just paying for that encouragement.
You see, this past year the North Carolina Legislature, with it's "cut to the bone" budget, managed to give $200,000 to the "NC Space Grant." Just last week the federal government, via NASA, gave another $353,000. The NC Space Grant agency now has over half a million dollars of taxpayer funds to spend.
Space Grant is a program created by Congress to "try to inspire students to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics." That's right, without that half million dollars spent every year, no one would study science, technology, or engineering.
Have you seen your tax dollars today?
Posted by: Ogre at
04:03 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
October 08, 2005
Gone Fishin'

I'm gone for the weekend, fishing in the North Carolina Mountains. See you Sunday night or Monday morning!
Posted by: Ogre at
07:05 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Sissy at October 09, 2005 10:11 AM (27GT7)
2
But, but...you're a giiRRRRRRllll...
Girls don't like fishing...

Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 07:10 PM (iJFc9)
3
Ya knooooow, if you find a girl who likes fishin'... you may just find a mate. Just sayin'... ;-)
Posted by: Bou at October 10, 2005 11:32 PM (5JHEt)
4
Hey, are you trying to play matchmaker?
Posted by: Ogre at October 11, 2005 05:31 AM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 07, 2005
National Novel Writing Month
It's time! Well, it's almost time. Once again this year, as it has been for the past six years, November is National Novel Writing Month -- or for those who like acronyms, it's NaNoWriMo.
What's that? From
the web site:
National Novel Writing Month is a fun, seat-of-your-pants approach to novel writing. Participants begin writing November 1. The goal is to write a 175-page (50,000-word) novel by midnight, November 30.
Valuing enthusiasm and perseverance over painstaking craft, NaNoWriMo is a novel-writing program for everyone who has thought fleetingly about writing a novel but has been scared away by the time and effort involved.
Hey, it's loads of fun.
If you have ever dreamed of writing a novel -- and I know many bloggers have -- this is the time to sit down and force yourself to do it. I participated last year and wrote about a
Wizard's Adventure. I won (wrote the required number of words), but the story wasn't done.
So if you follow that link above to read the story, you'll get a decent story (not much proofreading, etc.), but it ends rather suddenly. I haven't decided yet this year if I'll continue that story or start a whole new one. I'm leaning towards just starting a new story all over again.
So if you think you want to write, check that site out. Let me know if you join up, we can harass one another to ensure we all finish what we start!
Posted by: Ogre at
02:03 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Writing a novel -- I've written four and am about to finish my fifth -- is not fun. It's a bit like root canal without anesthesia. The only reason to do it is that not doing it would hurt even worse.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto at October 07, 2005 03:54 PM (PzL/5)
2
For me, novel-writing is a supreme catharsis that I (most of the time) enjoy immensely. I'm glad to find another NaNoer!
Posted by: Anders Bruce at October 07, 2005 05:28 PM (C6ihx)
3
Interesting position, Francis, interesting.
Thanks for stopping by, both of you!
Anders I LOVE the writing, I just can't find the time. That's why I tried NaNoWriMo last year, to FORCE me to find the time. And I did!
Posted by: Ogre at October 08, 2005 07:54 AM (iJFc9)
4
Ogre: forced subjugation to da muse, that's what you have to do. But I'm gonna pass, tempting as it is.
What would I have to give up? Hmmm... letssee: blogging, playing with the kids, noogie with the Significant OtherHunter, chorus practice, blogging, sleeping, Thanksgiving holiday, a good bit of work, blogging...
I fancied myself an amateur writer in my college and grad school years; wrote several short stories and had a novel going. But being too much of a perfectionist, it became torturous for me. So what did I end up doing instead? I became an editor for my profession! (Go figure.) Now blogging is my catharsis.
Power to you, bud! I know you'll win this year too! (And, hope you caught some fish!)
Posted by: The MaryHunter at October 08, 2005 09:53 AM (SRaIZ)
5
I cannot imagine being able to write a novel. I'm not creative at all. I can only write what I see. I can weave a tale from my past or surroundings, but nothing made up. My brain just doesn't think that way.
Posted by: Bou at October 08, 2005 10:02 PM (5JHEt)
6
TMH, I was surprised at how little I actually had to give up. I found time all over the place that I was just wasting. I'm sure it helps that the words are already in my mind, I just have to get them to paper (computer) -- and since I type pretty darn fast, in an hour I'd get around 3-5,000 words written.
Bou, you need that book, "No Plot, No Problem."

Posted by: Ogre at October 09, 2005 06:27 PM (iJFc9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 138 >>
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.2511 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2421 seconds, 106 records returned.
Page size 71 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.