Rocket Jones
September 12, 2005
Quotable
TV analyst Randy Cross said this about Denver quarterback Jake Plummer:
"Plummer is the Billy Graham of the NFL. He can make 70,000 people say 'Jesus' in unison."
LMAO
Posted by: Ted at
04:20 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I wasn't saying that...It was more along the lines of:...
well, in hindsight, I can't really share what I was saying.
Painful. so very painful.
Posted by: Derek at September 12, 2005 10:54 AM (FloaD)
2
I liked watching Plummer play in Arizona. I *love* seeing him play in Denver. Of course, I'm speaking as a Raiders fan.
Posted by: Ted at September 12, 2005 11:35 AM (blNMI)
3
Let's see...Jake the "Snake", Plumbers use snakes to unclog sewer lines...evidently he's in line for a new profession?!
Posted by: schirmdog at September 12, 2005 02:24 PM (zkvIv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 11, 2005
Timing is everything when it comes to gas prices
I filled up yesterday after work and paid $2.99 a gallon.
This morning as I passed the gas stations on the way to the rocket launch, the prices were all $2.89 a gallon. Dang.
Posted by: Ted at
06:52 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Dont you miss the days where you and mom would complain about the outrageous gas prices of anything over a dollar.
*snickers*
Posted by: Mookie at September 11, 2005 08:29 PM (DqTfF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Rocket Launch Today
I'm going about my normal life, but what happened on this day will never be far from my mind.
I also didn't do a specific countdown like I have the last two years. Click this link to see my previous
Countdown to 9/11 images.
Have a great day.
Posted by: Ted at
07:03 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Sorry I missed y'all again today.I just decided to keep my money in my pocket and my gas in my tank.We've still got a couple of more chances this year so.......
Posted by: Russ at September 11, 2005 05:01 PM (ObxzR)
2
BTW,Love those old adds.I especially like old Chrysler war adds.Pretty much anything B-29(development) or Sherman tank(development and production).
Posted by: Russ at September 11, 2005 05:07 PM (ObxzR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 10, 2005
I don't normally hold a grudge, but...
I just thought of the perfect line to use next time Sears calls me:
The only reason I'd ever set foot in a Sears again is if my house is underwater and I need someplace to loot.
I'd probably preface that with a "Ma'am", 'cause I'm a gentleman like that.
Posted by: Ted at
05:14 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Tell 'em you know a blogger in S.Fl who feels the same way. GRRR.
Posted by: Bou at September 10, 2005 09:12 PM (5JHEt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mookie News
Rachael got her work/study assignment. She's working for the Drama Department, mostly at the campus theater.
That's like asking a mermaid to be a lifeguard.
Posted by: Ted at
08:31 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Movie Review
Malibu Beach Vampires
Actually, this is more like a warning to keep away from this incoherent mess of a film. I'll describe the movie a little bit, but please, don't think I'm trying to make it sound entertaining. Any implied enjoyment value is strictly accidental.
Wanna see the funniest bit in the film?

Ignore the words, those are just stupid. Check out the teeth. Get it? Southern California? The desire for perfect teeth, even for vampires. I thought it was funny, but believe it or not, that shot in the opening credits was the highlight of the movie.
Bad, bad, bad. You'll see much better acting at your local high school production. You'll only understand the storyline if you read the description on the box first. The cameraman has parkinsons. Twice, they inexplicably break into tap dancing numbers or folk guitar sing-alongs (or both, intercut in one sanity-rending sequence).
I forced myself to finish watching, hoping for another "smile" moment that never came. This flick sucked so bad that I didn't even realize until later that there wasn't a single bare boob displayed, despite the advertising.
I can't even bring myself to blame the distributer for lying about the nudity. I'd probably lie too if I was stuck trying to sell this...
Words fail me.
Posted by: Ted at
07:35 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Words fail me.
Well, not entirely.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 10, 2005 08:07 AM (QriEg)
2
Sounds like a regular Ned Flanders Halloween Special!HAHAHA!!!!!!
Posted by: Russ at September 10, 2005 02:23 PM (ObxzR)
3
Ted, why you so consistently subject yourself to watching movies like this all the way through, I'll never know. Man, you can rent video games at the rental place too ya know? You should categorize all these into one section, just as a monumnet to your steely tolerance.
Posted by: shank at September 10, 2005 04:57 PM (jfEhX)
4
Rent? What is this "rent" thing you speak of? You can't find these flicks at the video store, ya gotta buy 'em. If I've paid a few buck for it, I'm for sure gonna see every putrid second.
Posted by: Ted at September 10, 2005 05:19 PM (+OVgL)
5
What you need, Ted, is a couple of robots...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 11, 2005 12:33 AM (QriEg)
6
Sounds kind of like Surf Nazis Must Die. The opening credits are really good, really establishes that the surf Nazis must die, but it falls apart pretty quickly.
Posted by: Dave Munger at September 17, 2005 01:38 AM (GfB1S)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 09, 2005
Naval Gazing
I've written before about the US Navy's new destroyer, known as DD(X). It's slated to replace the Arleigh Burke class of destroyers, which had replaced the WWII era Spruance class. As you can see, the US doesn't churn out lots of new ship designs.
But the DD(X) is more than a mere upgrade, it's a massive leap forward in technology and capability. Incorporating stealth technology, it's designed for littoral as well as deep water combat.
DD(X) is designed to be the quietest surface ship in the fleet. The ship will be quieter even than the Los Angeles class submarines.
It's sneaky.
DD(X) will employ a first of its kind Peripheral Vertical Launch System (PVLS). Missiles are typically stored in clusters at the center of a ship. PVLS, by moving those clusters to the hull, will provide the ship with something reminiscent of the reactive armor fitted to the M1A2 Abrams main battle tank. The PVLS concept has already been successfully tested, and will make this ship significantly less vulnerable to sea-skimming missiles.
It's harder to hurt.
Each 155mm gun will fire a Long Range Land Attack Projectile (LRLAP). The LRLAP has already been successfully tested to 83 nautical miles. Though it only carries 24 lbs of high explosives, the Advanced Gun System (AGS) is fully automated and holds a magazine of 300 rounds. With a rate of fire of 10 rounds a minute, the AGS should be able to provide the volume fire capability the Navy so desperately needs, and with GPS-guidance the LRLAP will be extremely accurate.
It can hit targets at long range. But how accurate can it really be at those ranges?
Tests have shown the guns accurate to within two meters at a range of 68 nautical miles.
Make sure you let the gunner know which corner of that executive desk you want to hit.
But wait, the DD(X) only has two guns, and each gun only firing once every 6 seconds, that's not much of a heavy punch.
...each gun will be capable of putting up to eight rounds on a target simultaneously. To achieve this effect, shells will be fired in rapid succession at different trajectories.
Lob one, aim lower, lob one, aim lower, lob one, aim lower, and so on. And they all hit the target at the same time. Sixteen booms. Isn't that four batteries of artillery?
The gun magazines can also be reloaded at sea and while the gun is firing. Oh, and those shells cost 1/20th of what a cruise missile costs.
The crew is half the size of the current DDG class, which will also offer up significant savings over the life of each vessel. The first two are scheduled to be active by 2012. These look to be sweet additions to the fleet, plus, future improvements are already being accounted for.
The Navy hopes to fit these ships with an electromagnetic rail gun by 2020. The rail gun would be capable of firing a guided projectile up to 267 nautical miles, which would put all of North Korea into range from either coast of that peninsula (or, to take another theoretical example, allow the Navy to bombard Paris from the English Channel).
DD(X), coming soon to a shore near you.
Thanks to
Robert the Llama Butcher for the pointer. He's got more links at his place too.
Posted by: Ted at
12:11 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
While the DDx has a lot of new technology, some are dubious about its introduction to the fleet. (In particular, most of the commenters over at murdoconline.) Part of the problem is the cost. At a billion per unit, it is an expensive boat. For the price of one DDx, you could get significantly greater numbers of LCS (Littoral Combat Ships - in one variation, nifty little catamarans with missiles and sensors) or other ships. More ships are more survivable for the fleet as a whole, and more flexible in deployment. And with modern communications, they can all fire as one big battery.
There have been cost overruns as well, and fears that the long range gun does not live up to the hype.
I think that in the end it will be a decent ship, and we'll probably build several of them. But with increasingly accurate smart munitions coming down the development pipeline, the bigger the ship the bigger the target.
Posted by: buckethead at September 09, 2005 01:36 PM (ztNrs)
2
"The bigger the ship, the bigger the target"
True, but the bigger the ship, the more likely to survive a missile hit (or two or ten).
There will be a place for all of them in the fleet, but with the expected massive volley launches in modern warfare, there will be plenty of warheads to target each ship multiple times, and the smaller ships will simply cease to be under the onslaught.
Destroyers are always in demand. I wanna see new deepwater ASW and AA frigates too.
Posted by: Ted at September 09, 2005 02:50 PM (blNMI)
3
Wow, it seems like they just commissioned the Arleigh Burke. Technology moves a bit faster these days, I guess.
Posted by: nic at September 09, 2005 05:02 PM (l+W8Z)
4
PVLS, by moving those clusters to the hull, will provide the ship with something reminiscent of the reactive armor fitted to the M1A2 Abrams main battle tank. The PVLS concept has already been successfully tested, and will make this ship significantly less vulnerable to sea-skimming missiles.
Sounds like a direct response to the USS Cole bombing. OOO-RAH!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 11, 2005 06:04 PM (Ys8qm)
5
A little correction to your research:
The SPRUANCE (DD-963) was commissioned in 75, hardly a WWII class DD.
The SPRUANCEs (I served on two and am a plank owner on one of them) replaced the venerable GEARING Class DDs, that were almost all built in 1944 and 45. They served well into the 70's. I did a midshipman cruise on the USS CONE (DD-881) in the summer of '73.
Posted by: Curt at October 01, 2005 01:32 PM (CKx8W)
6
Thanks for the correction, Curt. If I would've thought a second, I'd would've realized that the Spruance class was named after the admiral, who fought in WWII.
Posted by: Ted at October 01, 2005 02:04 PM (+OVgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I think he forgot to count the seven in the secret cabal
Over at the Ministry of Minor Perfidy, GeekLethal crunches some numbers and sums it all up like this:
The subjegation of the entire Muslim world by Israel would, in a demographic sense, be like Massachusetts enslaving all of China.
There's not enough tinfoil in the world.
Posted by: Ted at
11:59 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Loved
Thanks to everyone who left birthday wishes in the comments and email yesterday. Y'all are the best!
On Wednesday, I got a very unexpected birthday present from some co-workers who broke all records in accomplishing a regularly scheduled task. Once they finish, then I have several hours worth of work that I have to do with their results. Usually I have to do that on Thursday, but because they were so quick this time I was able to get it all done Wednesday afternoon and take my birthday off. They'll get a big thanks from me, and they didn't even know.
Rachael got me
The Mummy: The Legacy Collection. Tres cool. Thanks sweetie!!!! You may remember that last year for my birthday she got me the rereleased Bakshi animation
Wizards, and for Father's Day she bought me a hybrid rocket motor system, so I recommend that y'all get on her gift-giving list, because she's good at it.
I've been on a movie kick lately, so Liz took me out for a Mexican dinner (my favorite) and then turned me loose in Suncoast Video. I picked up
Clash of the Titans,
Blonde in Bondage (1950's Swedish exploitation flick), and a collection of four low-budget horror movies that had two things to recommend them; I haven't seen any of them, and they all contain nudity (look for upcoming reviews). Altogether I've probably bought two dozen B-movies in the last couple of weeks, so I'll have plenty to watch on those cold winter nights.
Thanks again folks, you made the day special.
Posted by: Ted at
05:47 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Any day that winds up filled with Swedish blondes,especially ones in bondage,is a good day.
Posted by: Russ at September 09, 2005 06:41 AM (ObxzR)
2
Target is selling double feature, B-movie horror dvds for a buck. Twelve delightfully cheesy movies for $6. I will start watching tonight.
Posted by: buckethead at September 09, 2005 01:39 PM (ztNrs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Historical Tidbit
Apparently Americans have a habit of vandalizing statues of those we consider tyrants. All the way back to July 9, 1776.
Later that night, American troops destroyed a bronze-lead statue of Great Britain's King George III that stood at the foot of Broadway on the Bowling Green [New York - RJ]. The statue was later molded into bullets for the American Army.
That's from an exhibit of the Declaration of Independence at the Library of Congress.
Posted by: Ted at
05:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
September 08, 2005
Defying Classification
Rachael has joined several clubs at her college. Among them are the Pagan Club and the Young Republicans. That oughtta cause a few raised eyebrows.
Posted by: Ted at
01:47 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
These are, like, the World's Most Serious birthday posts.
Posted by: Victor at September 08, 2005 03:54 PM (L3qPK)
2
So is she a pagan, does she just want to meet pagans, or make fun of pagans, or do pagans have the best parties?
Posted by: nic at September 08, 2005 05:33 PM (l+W8Z)
3
In her words, "it just looked interesting".
Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 05:52 PM (+OVgL)
4
Pagan ... cool...
Hey when did you get the naked girl riding the rocket logo? That's ultra hot, is that Jen ?
lol
Posted by: Oorgo at September 08, 2005 06:32 PM (lM0qs)
Posted by: Jennifer at September 08, 2005 06:37 PM (7NNfp)
6
Hmm... brunette eh? ... and Ted likes brunettes... hmmm... You read of course, his review of Dr. Horror's Erotic House of Idiots...
Posted by: Oorgo at September 08, 2005 06:42 PM (lM0qs)
7
Speaking of raising eyebrows, I'm with oorg. The new girl is stronger than train smoke baby!
Posted by: shank at September 08, 2005 09:45 PM (jfEhX)
8
I put her up for one day last year. I might leave her up for a couple days this year. She's my birthday girl.
Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 11:04 PM (+OVgL)
9
One Tip:
"Skyclad" does not mean suitable attire for launching rockets in, despite the name.
You could have a nasty accident.
Posted by: Zoe Brain at September 10, 2005 09:09 AM (jJBFr)
10
D'oh! I missed her!

Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 11, 2005 06:24 PM (Ys8qm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Gay Marraige, Coast to Coast
Governator to veto Gay Marraige Bill in California. His reasoning is that five years ago Proposition 22 was on the ballot, prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marraige in California, and was passed by a wide margin.
In other words, the majority of Californian's don't want it, and he, unlike the Legislature, remembers that he works for the people.
In related news, the Massachusetts state legislature ingnored repeated requests to put the matter of gay marriage up for a vote, and eventually the State Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage couldn't be denied. This made gay marriage supporters very happy. This made anti-gay marriage folks very unhappy.
So now the anti- foks are mobilizing and the state legislature is looking into putting it up for a vote. Guess what? The anti- folks far outnumber the pro-, so if it goes to the polls, it's likely that the law will change, making the court decision moot.
Democracy can be a bitch. But there are ways to make your dream happen.
This isn't one of them. Publishing a list of everyone who signs the petition against gay marriage? Cheap, stupid, and it will, in the end, have exactly the opposite effect that they hope for.
I've said this for a long time (
Dawn probably remembers some debates I had in her comments way back), the only way for gays to win approval for marriage is by convincing voters that it's a good and decent thing to do. Using the courts to win the right accomplishes nothing permanent, and doing an end-around the voters by legislation isn't the answer either.
Convince enough average voters that Gay Marriage isn't doomsday and you'll get it. But all of the tantrums and name-calling and attempted intimidation isn't going to change a single mind, and you'll just be impressing some people who are already on your side. You'll also be
turning off some people who are on your side.
People like me.
Posted by: Ted at
12:04 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Homosexuals will never win fair treatment when the primary method for obtaining fair treatment is out-breeding those who disagree with you.
In a system based upon mob-rule, the mob decides.
Posted by: BLUE at September 08, 2005 02:32 PM (4Xncc)
2
Homosexuals will never win fair treatment when the primary method for obtaining fair treatment is out-breeding those who disagree with you.
Well, it's a good thing that's not the case then.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 08, 2005 06:16 PM (QriEg)
3
"Convince enough average voters that Gay Marriage isn't doomsday and you'll get it."
Yes.
Though I'd prefer the term "same sex" marriage, rather than "gay" as such. My wife isn't lesbian, I'm female - and the body is slowly changing to match.
I'm in a minority, but there's rather more in that minority than most people think. Being told that such marriages are "invalid" hurts. It especially hurts any children.
Posted by: Zoe Brain at September 09, 2005 02:10 AM (tAq8A)
4
Good point Zoe, but not one that many people would think of. Educating folks has to be done first, it's much easier to convince people who know exactly what you're talking about.
Posted by: Ted at September 09, 2005 06:45 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Crass Observation
The Democrats have been trying to overcome the perception that they are soft on national security and would be able to handle a major crisis. By her actions, Louisiana Governor Blanco has managed, in a little more than a week, to firmly cement that perception into reality in the minds of many.
Posted by: Ted at
10:06 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Happy birthday, Ted! Glad you're still older than me!
Posted by: Victor at September 08, 2005 11:31 AM (L3qPK)
2
Or maybe she's proven all women are bad at handling major crises.
Or maybe the mayor has proven all black people are bad at handling major crises.
Or maybe--just maybe--she's proven that she herself is not so great at handling major crises.
And OT--happy birthday!
Posted by: Jennifer at September 08, 2005 11:52 AM (S2DIF)
3
Victor, don't forget the "wiser" part, that makes it ok.
Jennifer, I'm talking general political perceptions, not individual evaluations. You know, in the same way the moonbats are saying that the federal response proves that Republicans are racist, and right-winngnuts are claiming that God destroyed NO for it's gay festival. Or to be less extreme, that Republicans are automatically white and rich and Democrats are automatically for the little guy and minorities. None of those are particularly accurate, but they are the general accepted perceptions.
Katrina will be remembered as the first really big disaster response since 9/11 (although I think Florida last year may have been bigger overall, but it was multiple events), and people are going to point out that Governor Blanco is a Democrat and that she screwed up when it counted most. That's not really fair, but it is the way it works.
Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 12:27 PM (+OVgL)
4
Oh, and thanks for the birthday wishes!
Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 12:29 PM (+OVgL)
5
Does it take a conservative to truly and adequately wish Ted Happy Birthday?
Just in case it does, Happy Birthday Ted.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 08, 2005 12:48 PM (ics4u)
6
You're a conservative? That's ok then.

Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 01:37 PM (+OVgL)
7
I didn't forget the 'wiser' part. *ducks*
Posted by: Victor at September 08, 2005 02:38 PM (L3qPK)
Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 05:52 PM (+OVgL)
9
Have a happy day,Ted.Or at least what's left of it.
Posted by: Russ at September 08, 2005 06:10 PM (ObxzR)
Posted by: Zoe Brain at September 09, 2005 02:12 AM (tAq8A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 07, 2005
Belated and Otherwise
September Blogger Birthdays
LeeAnn - yesterday (I'm sorry, I didn't look this stuff up until this morning)
Boudicca - 8th (all the *really* cool kids have birthdays on the 8th)
Me - 8th (thanks to
Cindy for thinking of me!)
Blue - 9th (podcaster extraordinaire, he's got a blog now but I lost the link)
Jennifer - 14th (she's a student, buy her Ramen)
Pixy Misa -
19th 20th (must be that upside down calendar they use in Australia)
Victor -
27th 28th (that's what I get for trying to do two year old calendar math in my head)
Happy Happy, Everyone!
Posted by: Ted at
06:06 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Thanks, Ted, but mine's actually on the 28th. Please don't age me any faster than I already am ;~)
Posted by: Victor at September 07, 2005 07:30 AM (L3qPK)
2
Well, it will be the 19th where you are, but it will be the 20th for me.
Curiously enough, half the staff at work have birthdays in the space of a single week in September. Okay, it's a small company but it's not that small.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 07, 2005 09:07 AM (QriEg)
3
It will be the 8th here in an hour but I'll be asleep by then, so HAPPY BIRTHDAY TED!!!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 07, 2005 09:08 AM (QriEg)
4
Since I am working on becoming left-handed, I'm typing really slowly...so by the time I finish pecking this out it should be tomorrow. Happy birthday to you, and yay!
Posted by: nic at September 07, 2005 04:23 PM (l+W8Z)
Posted by: BLUE at September 07, 2005 04:54 PM (4Xncc)
6
One more hour and you and I are a year older! Wow, now doesn't that sound kind of absurd?
Posted by: Bou at September 07, 2005 11:10 PM (5JHEt)
7
Happy, Happy Birthday, Rocket Jones!
Posted by: Silver Blue at September 08, 2005 09:49 AM (GuDvW)
8
Happy birthday, Mr. Rocket Man.
Too bad you're not around to see my skirt blowing up over my head, a la Marilyn. But you get the idea.

Posted by: dawn at September 08, 2005 01:14 PM (jFpDX)
9
A picture is worth a thousand words, dear.

Posted by: Ted at September 08, 2005 01:38 PM (+OVgL)
10
[Being sung in a sweet husky voice a la Marilyn Monroe]
Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday to you!
Happy Birthday Mr. Jones...
Happy Birthday to you!
Sorry for your birthday greeting not being more original but I've been wiped out from burning the candle at both ends.
Posted by: michele at September 08, 2005 08:24 PM (+/zz3)
11
Happy birthday Ted! Sorry was without the laptop and therefore couldn't email you my birthday wishes earlier today. Hope you had a wonderful day!
Posted by: Cindy at September 08, 2005 09:08 PM (UYdu8)
Posted by: phin at September 08, 2005 10:35 PM (DGPlf)
13
Belated Happy! Harv's Birthday is the 14th, too, by the way...and when I post his birthday present, I'll ping you, too, since I'm sure you'll enjoy it as much as he will...

Posted by: Susie at September 11, 2005 10:55 AM (nekkG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 06, 2005
Finally, The Movie Review You've Been Waiting For
That's right, boys and girls, it's time for the Rocket Jones review of:
Dr. Horror's Erotic House of Idiots
Pre... whatchamacallit: When I
jumped at the chance agreed to accept a reviewer's copy of this movie, I promised myself that I would give a fair and honest review. I do believe that I've kept that promise, and I hope that after reading it, you'll think so too.
I was thinking about what a pain it would be to have to keep typing "Dr. Horror's Erotic House of Idiots" throughout this review, but the acronym "DrHEHoI", is just as bad.
Everyone has had that moment while watching a movie or television show when you recognize an actor or actress but can't quite place where else you've seen them. It can drive you crazy, until at last your memory clicks, and then it's an almost physical feeling of relief. Likewise, it's often a pleasant surprise to see someone you recognize in an unexpected role. This movie is full of those wonderful and surprising moments.
Now I have to tell you that this isn't a horror movie... exactly. I mean, there are undead and werewolves that play prominent roles, but the focus isn't on horror, it's on satire and parody and spoof (spoofage? That might be a dirty word). In overall feel, I'd liken
Dr. Horror (don't make me type the whole freakin' thing out people), to that paean to the surreal,
Happiness of the Katakuris. Plotwise, the story is fresh, intricate and plausible in its own charming way.
Without giving away too much of the story, there are three people who come to visit a famous sex therapist. Unfortunately, the doc is away, and the caretaker scams them by passing off his buddy as the "substitute" doctor, Dr. Horror. And that's about as bare-bones a description as is possible about a movie that runs 2+ hours.
Yep, you read that right, but not to worry, because it keeps moving right along. There are several long vignettes, almost mini-movies, that are used to advance the story, and nothing is rushed or hurried. Like old-time roadshow movies, it even has an Overture, Intermission and whatever you call that music when the movie is done (Enditure?). In addition, there's one helluva entertaining documentary included on the disk called "
That's Independent". All told, there's over 3 hours of viewable material.
Here are a couple of exerpts from the letter that Producer Paul Scrabo sent along with the movie:
"Dr Horror had one intention in its conception: whatever the "B-Movie rules" were, we would just do the opposite.
I wouldn't go so far as to say it's G-rated, but there's no nudity, no gore and no potty jokes. In fact, the humor and innuendo is often subtle and mature. I said "often", not always. This flick made me laugh out loud several times, and more than once I had to pause it so I could stop chuckling and then rewind to see what I'd missed.
In the low-budget world, horror is in good shape, so it did not make sense to make one. Rather, we decided to poke some fun at the world of "direct to video" fare. The "erotic" in the title is a joke on the many films that have "erotic" in the title in order to make them more "marketable".
Sex sells, even crappy B-movie sex.
Dr. Horror, though, works the "erotic" into the story line, which is more than the typical indie flick. Pick up "
Satanic Rites of the Erotic Cannibal Blood Sacrifice" (don't bother, I just made that up), and you can pretty much bet that "erotic" stands for gratuitous nudity. I'm all for boobs on screen, but face it, if you're spending the night at Camp Meathook, you should probably reconsider that urge to get naked. Especially since nude teenagers are the horror movie equivalent of Star Trek's guy in the red shirt.
"But mon ami," you may ask, "what about ze eye candy?!?!?"
Let me tell you, mi amigo (screw consistancy), this movie has plenty of nice looking ladies in outfits that make it fun to look. Which is as good a segue as any to start talking about the stars. The cast of "
Dr Horror" is filled with familiar names, familiar faces and true legends from the world of B-movie cinema. One of the reasons this took so long to write was because every time I'd start researching the actors, I'd wind up off on a tangent following someone's career.

First up is Debbie Rochon. Now I'm partial to brunettes in the first place, but when my wife saw Ms. Rochon on the screen, her first words to me were "oh wow, you're in love, aren't you?" She knows me so well. Debbie Rochon is drop-dead gorgeous and the lady can act too, starting out on stage on and off Broadway before going into the scream queen biz, where she's won numerous awards. She displays a great sense of comedic timing, and her "dolphin book" scene will make you forget the diner in
When Harry Met Sally.
Is she really a star? Well, she's been elected into the B-Movie Hall of Fame. I'd certainly roll out the red carpet for her.
Trent Haaga plays a complete jerk, yet still manages to make you care about his character. That's quite a tightrope to walk, but he balances everything with, again, a fine sense of comedy. This is the first time I've seen his work, and he shines.
The character of Ashley is played by Nathan Sears. This was his first role, and he is so convincing as the milqutoast nebbish that you just want to reach out and
force him to strip to prove he actually has testicles shake some sense into him. That is, until he is compelled to become a hero, and then he becomes... well, maybe not John Wayne, but tougher than Wayne Newton for sure.
Dr. Horror is played by Michael R. Thomas. You might not recognize the name, but you've certainly seen his work, because he's been a Hollywood makeup artist for a long time. Among his credits are
The Wiz,
Neighbors,
Ghostbusters (both of them),
Wolfen,
Fatal Attraction, and television. He also did a bit of work on... *drumroll please*
softcore lesbian spoofs shot direct to video. Yay!

Mr. Thomas has done some acting too. I first saw him in front of the camera in
Lord of the G-Strings (see above), but he played Smirnoff the wizard and hid behind a full beard. I recognized him from his part as the club owner in
Bite Me! He's a funny guy, and if I had to describe him, it might be as a cross between Bela Lugosi and Michael Richards (Kramer from Seinfeld). His background in makeup is a bonus too. I wrote recently about enjoying the
Frankenstein Legacy Collection. Well, imagine my delight when Michael Thomas appeared in one Dr. Horror vignette as Ygor! Originally played by Bela Lugosi in
Son of Frankenstein, Mr. Thomas brilliantly recreated the character, right down to the accent and the scarred and broken neck. That scene right there is worth the price of the movie to me.
"His business card reads, "Conrad Brooks, Movie Star." The New York Times named him, "The Gielgud of Bad Movies," a title he embraces fondly."
-- I-Con 23 website
The last main character is the caretaker, played by Conrad Brooks. He's a likeable guy, but gives the weakest performance of the cast. On the other hand, he got his start in Ed Wood movies, and over the years has appeared in, directed, produced, and written some real stinkers - many of which I own and love. He made appearances in two of the worst films ever made:
Plan 9 From Outer Space *and*
The Beast From Yucca Flats. Folks, that's a pedigree right there, and I have no standing to criticize.
Even the supporting characters have solid B-movie credentials. An unexpected bit of wonderfulness was the appearance of John Zacherle, who had a top-10 song in 1958 titled "
Dinner with Drac".
I will make mention that
Dr. Horror was co-written by "my girl" (as
Victor calls her),
Brinke Stevens, who also makes a cameo.
"It also helps to have a lighting director for a wife (George Ann Muller), and she made all the sets herself!"
-- Paul Scrabo
(take note, Mookie)
All right, so all I've done so far is gush about how wonderful this movie is. Surely, there must be something less than perfect about
Dr. Horror. Of course there is, because it's an independent movie. If you're looking for Hollywood, this isn't it. What this is, though, are cast and crew making movies because they love what they do and have fun doing it. I also want to make clear that independent doesn't mean amateur. Don't expect
Gone with the Wind, and you'll have a grand time watching this.
Highly recommended. You can get your own copy at
Scrabo.com.
For the record, I am not afraid of lesbians.
Posted by: Ted at
08:37 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Debbie Rochon, Brinke Stevens AND Michael R. Thomas?
I just ordered a copy!
Posted by: BLUE at September 07, 2005 05:14 PM (4Xncc)
2
Thanks for the review,Ted.I'll check it one day if I ever get the time and means.
Posted by: Russ at September 08, 2005 06:15 PM (ObxzR)
3
I want to thank Ted for taking the time to watch and write about our movie, and for the very kind review. We appreciate the opportuntity to be featured on the Rocket Jones site!
all best,
Paul
Posted by: Paul Scrabo at September 30, 2005 09:06 AM (Rk5I7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ok, what's next?
I went to the Potomac Nationals website this morning to check their schedule, thinking we'd get one last blogger get-together in before the season ends. Alas, the season ended with three games at home over the holiday weekend.
So now I'm open to suggestions. I welcome any ideas on when and if y'all would like to meet up again. I sent out invites for a poker night and got very little response. How about a picnic in October? Hockey game?
One interesting possibility is the fall BattlePark rocket launch in Culpeper, Virginia. It's scheduled for the first weekend of November (5th and 6th), and if anyone is interested
Doug Pratt introduced me to an amazing rib joint in that area for food afterwards.
Posted by: Ted at
11:33 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
What a beautiful weekend
Got lots done, including some work on the movie review, but you'll have to be patient for another day or so.
Posted by: Ted at
06:02 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Submarine, Cargo Vessel collide
The submarine USS Philadelphia (the boat my son served on) was cruising on the surface at about 2am (local) when they hit a Turkish cargo ship in the gulf off the coast of Bahrain. Damage to both was described as superficial and there were no injuries.
But there's a Captain who's gonna lose his ass.
Posted by: Ted at
05:58 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
September 05, 2005
Geek is chic?
Why bother with a personals ad, when you could just be mentioned in the NY Daily News? That's what happened to blogger CGHill of Dustbury. From the article:
...more women are discovering the allure of brainy men who admit they're more experienced at computer games than the game of love.
I'd like to let the ladies know that in school, I was the kid that the geeks beat up for lunch money so they could go to Radio Shack. I expect that I shall now be inundated in the lovelies, oh yeah.
Posted by: Ted at
03:43 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Wow! I could not put my finger on it, but now I can. Now I know why you are HOT!!!
Posted by: Amy at September 05, 2005 08:56 PM (8Rqqf)
2
Careful, you're dripping sarcasm on the carpet.

Posted by: Ted at September 05, 2005 09:33 PM (+OVgL)
3
And how effective was this little blurb in overwhelming my love life?
You'll note I have plenty of time to read this and post a comment.
Posted by: CGHill at September 06, 2005 09:51 AM (wmpjK)
4
Ted, you should have posted a "hot" photo of yourself with your Commodore 64! That would have totally brought 'em in.
Posted by: RP at September 06, 2005 12:25 PM (LlPKh)
5
Ha! I was an Atari 800 guy. I saved programs on cassette tape.
Oh man, I can't wait for the flood.
Posted by: Ted at September 06, 2005 12:56 PM (blNMI)
6
Mine was a Tandy Color Computer II, w/ tape drive hooked up to my parents color tv, in the living room.
Do I have you beat?
Oh, and I didn't mention the tape on my glasses too.
And the mullet.
Posted by: Oorgo at September 06, 2005 07:04 PM (lM0qs)
7
I only dated brainy men, geeky or not. I have a saying, "The Geeks ultimately rule the world." I prefer to be on their team.
BTW, you have a birthday coming up. ;-)
Posted by: Bou at September 06, 2005 09:48 PM (5JHEt)
8
Hey, I had a TI 99/4A. Thank the Maker for Moore's Law.
Posted by: owlish at September 06, 2005 10:40 PM (qYLOC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oh Buffy. Oh Brad.
Put away the white. The fashion lizard has spoken.
Have a wonderful holiday.
Posted by: Ted at
09:27 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
<< Page 60 >>
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.2745 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2665 seconds, 95 records returned.
Page size 62 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.