UK Government Is Hiding Excess Covid Vaccine Deaths
Plus: Ozempic Has Killed the "Body Positivity" Movement with an Assist from Unfunny Comic Amy Schumer
I shan't believe it, I simply shannot.
Government 'withholding data that may link Covid jab to excess deaths'
UKHSA argued that releasing figures would lead to 'distress or anger' of bereaved relatives if connection were discovered
The public health watchdog has been accused of a "cover-up" after refusing to publish data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to the "distress or anger" of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.
Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed alarm about "growing public and professional concerns" over the UK's rates of excess deaths since 2020.
In a letter to UKHSA and Department for Health, the MPs and peers said that potentially critical data -- which map the date of people's Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths -- had been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
...
UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments including that publishing the data "could lead to misinformation" that would "have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake" in the public.
...
Reform UK has committed to a public inquiry into excess deaths and alleged Covid vaccine harms.
...
Ben Kingsley, the legal director of UsForThem, said the way the UKHSA had handled the case "reveals a desperation that this data should not, in any form, see the light of day".
He added: "It is perverse for UKHSA to argue that this data should not be released because the public could feel distressed or angry if patterns or correlations were to be identified.
"You have to ask yourself why it is that the public are considered incapable of handling this data. It reveals a patronising mindset, which also characterised the pandemic response -- 'do what we say, don't ask any questions, we know what is best for you'."
The demand is for a release of
anonymized data -- names stripped out.
But this agency covering up the vaccine deaths keeps lying, claiming that an anonymized list would still, somehow, reveal the identity of people killed by the clot-shot.
In more health cover-up news -- or this time, the end of a long
cover-up: RFKJr. and his sexy brain-worm have updated the CDC website to clarify that claims that vaccines don't cause autism are not based in science.
The website doesn't say that vaccines do cause autism, just that the prior claims that they had been proven
not to cause autism were based on bureaucratic fiat, not evidence.
CDC updates website, says claims about vaccines not causing autism are not 'evidence-based'
"HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links," HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its website, saying that claims about vaccines not causing autism are not "evidence-based."
A previous version of the agency's webpage stated "there is no link" between receiving vaccines and developing autism, citing a 2012 National Academy of Medicine review of scientific papers and a 2013 CDC study, The Hill news outlet reported.
Late Wednesday, the website was updated and now says that the statement that vaccines do not cause autism "is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism."
The CDC also states that "studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities."
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has repeatedly linked vaccines and autism.
HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the website was updated "to reflect gold standard, evidence-based science."
In more health hoax news, Jennifer Sey notes that, now that medications can end obesity -- at least for those wealthy enough to afford it-- celebrities are no longer championing
"body positivity" and "Healthy At Any Size."
Unfunny formerly-fat "comedian" Amy Schumer has deleted all of her previous Instagram photos showing her as overweight, and now only shows pictures of her being, well, skinny. Over-skinny if you ask me.
But she insists that this has nothing, nothing to do with wanting to eliminate her fat pictures. It just kinda worked out thsi way.
Comedian Amy Schumer has deleted all of her old Instagram photos and all that remains are these post weight loss pics:
Schumer captioned the post as follows: "Back on my staircase bullshit again. Who's proud? I'm feeling good and happy. Deleted my old pics for no reason!"
Right, no reason. Because that's what people do. They go back and delete all posts from the last decade. Hundreds if not thousands of posts. Totally normal and no reason at all to do that!
...
Though the pics are all gone, the comments live on (in the New York Post)!
In response to the pic on the left above, Schumer's comedian friends wrote:
Chelsea Handler: "Yes!!!!! Look at this pic!!!!"
Lee Daniels chimed in: "Skinnnnnnnny mommmmma."
Kathy Griffen added: "I'm so pissed about your legs, I can barely talk to you."
Amy Sedaris complimented her fellow Amy: "You look incredible. Look at those pins!!!"
And Schumer basked: "Loving the love. My legs thank you!"
Not only does Amy like being skinny, her friends like skinny Amy too.
Schumer has had her share of weight gain woes. She wasn't obese but certainly chubby. Relatable! Fine. She's not a super model, she's a comedian. Round cheeks, a little belly, who cares! (Schumer, apparently.)
Her jam has been all about body positivity, up until dropping 40 pounds or so.
...
Here's the thing: No one wants to be fat. No one.
All the body positivity bullshit was just that: bullshit.
No one wants to be obese. No one even wants to be chubby with arm dangles. No one wants their belly hanging over their pants. No one wants to have trouble chasing their kids around. No one wants to have 3 chins. And I can assure you -- no one in Hollywood who has to spend all day around size 0s who eat nothing but lettuce leaves wants to be fat next to those people. No one.
...
But erasing every photo she ever put up on Instagram is just a bridge too far.
Now she's mad that the internet caught on to her shenanigans -- that she's trying to erase fat Amy -- and she's big mad. She posted this on Instagram in response to the internet calling it the end of body positivity:
"Hey media outlets I didn't delete my old photos because they were pre me losing weight. That's a narrative you created. I'm proud of how I've looked always. I have been working to be pain free and I finally am. My endometriosis is better. My back is healing. I no longer have Cushing syndrome so my face went back to normal. I am grateful to be strong and healthy especially for my son. But your Instagram is not your identity it's a curation of what you want the world to see and I feel great strong and beautiful and it's been fun sharing that. I didn't purposely go on a 'weight loss journey' that's a fine thing to go on. But my focus has been on health. I'm sure my weight will always fluctuate. I'm a perimenopausal woman on hrt meds. Wishing you strength and self love on whatever path you're on as long as it's kind and respectful to all people. No matter their weight race or religion peace!"
See, it's not about deleting the photos of herself when she was fat. It's about deleting the photos of herself when she was
unhealthy.
It just turns out, you know, that despite her Healthy At Any Size claims, she was less healthy when she was obese.
And of course she very deliberately went on a "weight loss journey." She stuck herself in the belly with a shot every week for a year, didn't she? What did she think was in the shot, vitamins? Midol?
I don't mind the "Healthy at Any Size"/"Fat Positivity" thing as an internal cope. We all have copes. We all have little lies we have to tell ourselves to keep the bad thoughts at bay. It's a survival mechanism and there's nothing wrong with surviving.
What got really annoying was the demand that everyone repeat, out loud, other people's copes and affirm those copes as 100% true. What got insufferable was pressuring every corporation to proclaim what should have been an internal, just you-and-your-reflection-talking-in-the-mirror cope as a Truth we must all recognize and Affirm.
We've seen a lot of this lately, with sad or even mentally-sick people demanding we all affirm their mentally-ill copes as the Revealed Truth of God Shimself.
Enough. Enough of the bullshit. Enough parroting the scripts that mentally-unwell, physically-sick people demanding we profess as God's Truth.
Anecdotally, I think this is true: eating earlier at night results in better sleep and better health.
Real Clear Science:
For instance, one study found that healthy adults who ate dinner at 10pm experienced 20% higher blood sugar peaks and burned 10% less fat compared to those who ate dinner at 6pm. This was despite both groups eating identical meals and having similar bedtimes.
Broader analyses support the same trends, with a meta-analysis of 29 trials reporting that earlier eating windows, fewer meals and eating the bulk of one's calories earlier in the day were linked to greater weight loss and improved metabolic markers (such as better blood pressure and lower blood sugar and cholesterol levels).
Other research links consistent late-night eating -- especially close to bedtime -- with poorer health outcomes and a greater risk of obesity and metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes.
Earlier dinners may better align with the body's natural metabolic rhythms, particularly when the last meal occurs well before the body enters its "rest" phase. This might explain why eating earlier has health benefits.
Many chronobiologists conclude that aligning food intake with circadian biology represents a promising, low-cost method of improving metabolic outcomes -- especially when combined with other lifestyle factors such as physical activity and healthy eating.
In winter, especially in northern latitudes, shorter days and longer nights can disrupt circadian rhythms.
Reduced sunlight can lower serotonin levels, contributing to low mood or seasonal affective disorder (SAD). When paired with longer evenings indoors, it's common for people to snack more often or delay eating dinner until later at night.
But digestion, hormone release (including those that help with sleep and digestion) and even the amount of calories you burn throughout the day all follow circadian rhythms. When meals are pushed too close to sleep, these processes overlap in ways that can affect both metabolism and rest -- potentially increasing risks of poor sleep and metabolic ill health.
So this is a GAINZZZ post now. Got any GAINZZZ? In my own Weight Loss Journey, I expended 25 unnecessary calories thinking about Amy Schumer for the first time in a year. Every little bit helps!
I keep finding that trying to get in 20 grams of creatine a day is giving me GI problems so I'm thinking about switching from creatine monohydride (the common, cheap version you're probably familiar with) to creatine HCl. The latter supposedly doesn't cause GI issues, but, here's the fun part, it's way more expensive than creatine monohydride. Anyone else having this problem, or seeing GAINZZZ in their BRAINZZZ from creatine?
Posted by:
Ace at
04:10 PM