Candace Owens: A National Concern

Candace Owens is being sued by Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte, and, I can't believe this, I'm on the Macrons' side.

Owens is a devoted conspiracy theorist (and antisemitic crusader) and has repeatedly claimed, without, seriously, any evidence, that Macron's wife is really a man, baby.

There is controversy over the term "woke right." I don't use the term myself.

But one attribute of the woke left has been to simply defame anyone they don't like. (While simultaneously demanding repressive censorship for anyone they don't like.)

Candace Owens certainly seems to enjoy this aspect of online wokism.

I don't like Macron and while I know nothing about his wife, her association with Macron, and the, um, interesting circumstances of their May (or early April)-December romance, suggest to me I wouldn't like her if I knew much about her.

But you can't just claim that someone was born the opposite sex because the bad chemicals in your head told you are a Diva Genius and that you deserve some Internet Attention today.

It's defamatory. Clearly. And it's a statement of fact, not opinion, so it can in fact be legally defamatory.

First, she doubled down on her slander and claimed that she would fund-raise her defense and use her position to harass the Macrons through discovery.

Owens needs to talk to a lawyer because discovery will only be permitted on the question of Brigitte Macron's birth sex. "Discovery" is not a license to demand any and all documents that you might want to use to embarrass your opponent. You can only discover documents germane to the actual case.

WATCH: Candace Owens just DOUBLED DOWN on Brigitte Macron being a man in response to getting sued.

"You were born a man and you will die a man... That's the point I'm making."

"I think you're sick. I think you're disgusting. And I am fully prepared to take on this battle on… pic.twitter.com/LXiGjuearU
— George (@BehizyTweets) July 24, 2025

Again, this is a simple factual matter. The relevant documents here are her birth certificate, certifications of enrollment in primary school, her marriage license, etc.

She can also discover the birth certificates for the children that Brigitte Macron gave birth to.

Allegedly gave birth to, I should say.

On 22 June 1974, Brigitte married banker Andre-Louis Auziere (1951 - 2019), with whom she had three children (Sebastien, born 1975; Laurence, born 1977; and Tiphaine, born 1984).

Owens can discover these, but she can't just go on a fishing expedition for anything she thinks that Macron wouldn't want to admit. She seems to think she can back Macron down by making this threat to discover all sorts of embarrassing information, but it's an empty threat. No judge will sign an order to discover anything that's not directly relevant to the case.

She seems to have been informed -- or to at least suspect -- that Brigitte Macron has a birth certificate stating that she is a female.

So now she's claiming...

Seriously, she's now claiming...

that the real Brigitte Macron died in childhood and that the birth certificate for this female child was then given to her brother, and that brother became "Brigitte Macron."

See, it was this girl's dying wish that her birth certificate be willed to her transgender brother.

Where is she getting this from?

Apparently, just from her low-IQ brain.

Again, she has no evidence for any of these claims. She's just compounding her first defamation with additional defamations.

So now, according to Candace Owens, Brigitte Macron was born a woman, died, and with her dying wish passed on her identity to her brother.

There's no way anyone still believes this crap right?

Come on guys...

You all got taken for a ride by an insane grifter. pic.twitter.com/ASSwUqpOAn
— Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) July 30, 2025

Meanwhile, she decided to interview Harvey Weinstein.

Her new crusade is that Harvey Weinstein was "set up" and framed. Even Weinstein resists this bizarre claim of Owens'.

But there's a reason she believes this. She doesn't say this straight-up, but she keeps suggesting that their are powerful people in Hollywood who wanted to "set up" Weinstein. Her suggestion is that they wanted to take possession of his back catalogue of movies.

She keeps demanding to know who now owns his back catalogue. She doesn't say this, but I think that given her very strong antisemtic sentiments, she's hinting around that Powerful Jews Conspired to frame Weinstein and steal his movies.

Weinstein, alas, disappoints her. He reports that two companies now own all of his old movies, and neither is an Israeli company.

One is owned by the Qatari government, and the other is owned by Saudis.

Candace: JUST SAY “JEWS” ALREADY—“THE JEWS WHO CONTROL HOLLYWOOD”—SAY IT.

Weinstein: Uh…

(Wait for the big surprise at the end)
pic.twitter.com/XZX9UKK8vz
— David Reaboi, Late Republic Nonsense (@davereaboi) July 31, 2025

Oooh, so close, Candace! Keep trying!

We believe in you!

If you don't know: Candace Owens has a very concerning Origin Story.

She claims she had been maligned by racists when she was in high school. She sued various people. I don't know the disposition of the case.

She decided that she would create a website to let people get vengeance on their online bullies. This website would be called "Social Autopsy." It would allow anyone to post unverified defamations about anyone else, as long as it was claimed that this defamatory information was in service of fighting back against online bullies.

Two leftwing women told Candace Owens this was a terrible idea, and that she was just creating a platform that malicious trolls and defamers could use to victimize people -- the exact opposite of what Owens claimed she wanted to create the website for.

Owens, who apparently believes that any idea that pops into her low-IQ head is a great one, decided that these two left-wing women were just jealous schemers trying to trick her out of her great idea to create a high-profile defamation website.

Of course, the two leftwing women were 100% right. I would not be inclined to believe them based on their politics, either, but if I listened to what they were saying -- a website that allows people to post unverified derogatory claims about other people with no effort at verification whatsoever would in fact empower online defamers and bullies, not check them -- I would have decided that these two leftwing women were right about this one issue.

When Candace Owens explains how she became "conservative" -- or whatever brand of conspiratorial, paranoid "politics" she practices -- she always talks about these two leftwing women trying to hoodwink her, and how she became a "conservative" in reaction to their trickery and scheming.

And since the very day I heard about this fruitcake, I thought: Boy, of all the reasons to join the right (or pseudoright), that has got to be the very worst possible reason, and I don't think that shows she's actually "conservative" at all.

More like she's a narcissistic headcase who can't accept criticism so she became a "conservative" because two women on the left criticized her.

Posted by: Ace at 06:27 PM

Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 First!

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:30 PM (ZOv7s)

2 Make it First !

Posted by: jsg at July 31, 2025 06:30 PM (QA89Y)

3 Hah!

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:30 PM (ZOv7s)

4 Shit

Posted by: jsg at July 31, 2025 06:30 PM (QA89Y)

5 Yep

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:30 PM (jUzef)

6 Damn

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:31 PM (jUzef)

7 Yeah shes very stupid on a whole host of fronts

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:31 PM (J63KV)

8 So what's the policy on referring to Mike Obama? There's far more smoke there than with Macron, right?

Posted by: SimoHayha at July 31, 2025 06:31 PM (clrIT)

9 Serious question: in this day and age, how is claiming someone is a tranny defamatory, particularly in France?

I thought trannies were the best people ever.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:32 PM (ZOv7s)

10 But
Ace HAS always believed that Michelle Obama is a tranny
Look at her arms !

Posted by: Aliassmithsmith at July 31, 2025 06:32 PM (fP1Ll)

11

What point is she trying to make?

Posted by: fourseasons at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (3ek7K)

12 >>> 9 Serious question: in this day and age, how is claiming someone is a tranny defamatory, particularly in France?

I thought trannies were the best people ever.
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:32 PM (ZOv7s)

Especially "trans" "women", those are the best women ever.

Posted by: Helena Handbasket at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (ULPxl)

13 You'd think she would fixate on the frankly kind of creepy age difference and how they got together as enough oddity.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (zZu0s)

14 It's defamatory. Clearly. And it's a statement of fact, not opinion, so it can in fact be legally defamatory.

I can't wait to hear the explanation of how it is defamatory, and what the damages are. Being trans is bad? Being a man is bad? Macron is gay, and that's bad? I assume you need to ham it up in court to shows damages and maximize damages, which should piss off the rainbow mafia as you shit on how disparaging it is to be one.

Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (ycI94)

15 Nutter than a truckload of squirrel shit.

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (jUzef)

16 She is nuts!

Posted by: Moonbeam at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (rbKZ6)

17 Just have the old battleaxe appear naked in court and bend over for all to see.

She's French, they like cheese and nakedness and exhibiting their disgusting bodies for all to see.

Posted by: Dirty Old Broad at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (R/m4+)

18 She sounds koo koo bananas.

This is news:

It's one minute. It's perfect for this site. Trust me.

https://youtu.be/SHb-3oIAFTs

(it's AI)

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (fV+MH)

19 Obviously Ace is worked up about this, but I am done with the idea of policing the right. Let a thousand lunatics bloom.

"But, it will be used to smear us all!"

LOL, we're getting smeared no matter what we do. The correct response at this late stage is: Bite me, you retard.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (ZOv7s)

20 10 But
Ace HAS always believed that Michelle Obama is a tranny
Look at her arms !
Posted by: Aliassmithsmith

I was always more concerned about her third leg poking her skirt when she danced with Ellen.

Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (ycI94)

21 Shouldn't the Mossad get a Credit Line, here?

Posted by: Candace Owens at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (fVmgO)

22 Ok, I didn't believe in jewish space lasers, but after seeing Ace's post, I'm a believer. How else does anyone get these crazy ideas and persevere in spelunking that rabbit hole without "special" help.

Posted by: Corona_exile_back_in_exile at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (4TAOz)

23 She's a hot piece of ass and nuttier than squirrel turds.

So...would. But would regret it.

Besides, there are many other reasons to mock the Macrons. They deserve it. But this is retarded.

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (xcxpd)

24 Anyone notice that the trolls collectively (and is it just me or have rainman and sid kind of fallen off?) Seem to be going for the 'you all are a bunch of fringe reichwingers? They set up the strawman which they then burn down, then say we believe in that. Huh.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (zZu0s)

25 At the very least, give them a H/T Ace.

It's what they pay you for!

Posted by: Candace Owens at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (fVmgO)

26 It seems to me that the sole purpose of Candace Owens is to malign right-thinking conservatives as some sort of fringe crackpot group.

Does she really have any sort of voice, following, or influence other than what the left allows to denigrate the right?

I can't say I can recall citing Owens for anything of merit.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (i24o9)

27 >>She's a hot piece of ass

I don't see it.

I think my penis is Racist or something.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (fVmgO)

28 "But, it will be used to smear us all!"

LOL, we're getting smeared no matter what we do. The correct response at this late stage is: Bite me, you retard.
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd

They're only calling us racist sexist queerphobic Nazi pedo rapist supporters. If we don’t back down, they may REALLY let us have it!

Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (ycI94)

29 I can't wait to hear the explanation of how it is defamatory, and what the damages are. Being trans is bad? Being a man is bad? Macron is gay, and that's bad? I assume you need to ham it up in court to shows damages and maximize damages, which should piss off the rainbow mafia as you shit on how disparaging it is to be one.
Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (ycI94)
---
What "harm" can a lunatic podcaster possibly inflict on the First Lad of France?

She's not showing actual malice, she believes this shit. About a public figure. So how does the case advance?

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (ZOv7s)

30 >>> 26 It seems to me that the sole purpose of Candace Owens is to malign right-thinking conservatives as some sort of fringe crackpot group.

Does she really have any sort of voice, following, or influence other than what the left allows to denigrate the right?

I can't say I can recall citing Owens for anything of merit.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (i24o9)

Crazy talk!!!

Posted by: Patriot Front at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (ULPxl)

31 >>>8 So what's the policy on referring to Mike Obama? There's far more smoke there than with Macron, right?

well, I mean, she did have children. I assume it's usually meant as a baiting joke.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:37 PM (KRtlO)

32 She once had a brief bout of sanity but it passed

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:37 PM (J63KV)

33 Easy defense, any chick standing next to macron would appear manly.

Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at July 31, 2025 06:37 PM (snZF9)

34
She's no concern of mine. I'm done with her. (Tucker, too.)

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at July 31, 2025 06:37 PM (zCv9W)

35 >>> 29 I can't wait to hear the explanation of how it is defamatory, and what the damages are. Being trans is bad? Being a man is bad? Macron is gay, and that's bad? I assume you need to ham it up in court to shows damages and maximize damages, which should piss off the rainbow mafia as you shit on how disparaging it is to be one.
Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (ycI94)
---
What "harm" can a lunatic podcaster possibly inflict on the First Lad of France?

She's not showing actual malice, she believes this shit. About a public figure. So how does the case advance?
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (ZOv7s)

I don't know but I suddenly have this weird craving for popcorn.

Posted by: Patriot Front at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (ULPxl)

36 The key to understanding this story is to understand that *most* people are complete idiots. It is like AI, only wet and smelly. They do not "think," as much as just randomly spit our words that sound nice.

Those that are good at this, and who have nice skin and hooters, tend to be listened to by the other smelly wet AI.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (SdZih)

37 Candace also doesn’t believe in dinosaurs. She’s an effin’ loon.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (77rzZ)

38 Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (xcxpd

Wait are you saying Candace Owen's is a 1? Lemme refresh.

Meh. Sorry, 0 for me.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (zZu0s)

39 BabbaZee at the old, original, sane LGF used to say the Left and the Right met at Jew Hate Junction.

She was right.

Posted by: jsg at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (QA89Y)

40 >>>Obviously Ace is worked up about this, but I am done with the idea of policing the right. Let a thousand lunatics bloom.

I don't think she's on the right, and I'm not "policing" anything, I'm calling out a low IQ fool, the same as I do every day.

And I'm not worked up about this. I've had the pieces of this story all week. I'm only posting it now because, well, *I need a post for the hour and I don't want to post one of my russiagate posts because we've done two of those today.*

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (KRtlO)

41 Off "front" sock!

Posted by: Helena Handbasket at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (ULPxl)

42 She's a hot piece of ass

I don't see it.

I think my penis is Racist or something.
Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (fVmgO)

Well tastes vary. Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (xcxpd)

43 It seems to me that the sole purpose of Candace Owens is to malign right-thinking conservatives as some sort of fringe crackpot group.

Does she really have any sort of voice, following, or influence other than what the left allows to denigrate the right?

I can't say I can recall citing Owens for anything of merit.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (i24o9)
---
She was a diversity hire at the Daily Wire, and was driven out. Given the antics over there, she might be the sane one.

And at this late date, I'm going to cut slack to the usual 'conspiracy theorists' because our entire fucking government has been involved in one for a decade.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (ZOv7s)

44 Is she an op?

Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (63Dwl)

45 38 Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (xcxpd

Wait are you saying Candace Owen's is a 1? Lemme refresh.

Meh. Sorry, 0 for me.
Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (zZu0s)

She's a 1....but with regret

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (xcxpd)

46 I'm still trying to figure out why Candace Owens is even a "thang".
We have enough low IQ folks tryin to help us... we don't need her.
She's only a thing cause the media has proclaimed her "right wing." She's the Washington Generals of the alt-media.
Sue her so hard she has to dig up grandpa for the wedding ring.

Posted by: MkY at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (cPGH3)

47 has repeatedly claimed, without, seriously, any evidence, that Macron's wife is really a man, baby.

'More masculine than Barack Obama' is not how you tell, people!

Posted by: t-bird at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (jnBG1)

48 And I'm not worked up about this. I've had the pieces of this story all week. I'm only posting it now because, well, *I need a post for the hour and I don't want to post one of my russiagate posts because we've done two of those today.*
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (KRtlO)
---
Fair enough. The content must flow.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (ZOv7s)

49 So far, this has been my favorite youtube video of the week:

https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=7M8q-qZnv3E&t=10s

The part with the little girl just killed me.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (fVmgO)

50 What bothers me about Candace is that she started pretty well, I liked her stuff. She was pretty common sense and was black so she shut down that racism accusation. But she's gone utterly nuts. Just lost her freaking mind. Its pretty obvious the guys at Daily Wire were trying to restrain her and realized they couldn't much longer.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (dfIr7)

51 Ok thats ridiculous about sweeney probably an 8

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (J63KV)

52 I like that we’ve got everyone to admit that being accused of being a transgender is clearly defamatory and disgusting and compensation is deserved.

That’s how little society thinks of these people. Despite pretending they are heroes we should look up to. Deep down, we know they are crazy psychos. Even the left knows this.

Posted by: Maroon at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (coYo0)

53 Candace is attractive. She also violates Rule #1 about as badly as any woman I've ever seen

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (j1Y/l)

54 I think Candace is a good-looking gal, but Rule #1.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (77rzZ)

55 15 Nutter than a truckload of squirrel shit.
Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:34 PM (jUzef)

Beat me to it

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (xcxpd)

56 Candy O is completely wrong. It's Emmanuel Macron who is a girl.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (L/fGl)

57
That's fair Ace.

Posted by: fourseasons at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (3ek7K)

58 Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo at July 31, 2025 06:39 PM (xcxpd)

Only the ghey ones.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (i24o9)

59 It seems to me she was more credible at one time but I could be wrong about that.

Posted by: Northernlurker , Maple Syrup MAGA at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (kTd/k)

60 >>Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.

Face: 6

Body: 8

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (fVmgO)

61 >>>What "harm" can a lunatic podcaster possibly inflict on the First Lad of France?
She's not showing actual malice, she believes this shit. About a public figure. So how does the case advance?

"Malice" includes making accusations without doing any investigation into whether they're true or not. "But I believe it!" isn't a defense.

As for harm: She's accusing world figures of lying to the public. That is "harm" per se. Brigitte Macron doesn't have to make the arguments you're claiming she does, that she's harmed because "trans people are bad." It's enough to say this is untrue and diminishes my reputation.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (KRtlO)

62 Candace also doesn’t believe in dinosaurs. She’s an effin’ loon.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (77rzZ)

Yeah thats pretty out there. I guess those are just 100 million year old building sized house pets archaeologists have been digging up.

Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (snZF9)

63 Well if they're calling every fringe nutter right-wing I hope people in power make the left claim every single one of their nutbags.

Posted by: CaliGirl at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (gpah0)

64 Ok thats ridiculous about sweeney probably an 8
Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:40 PM (J63KV)
---
She is not my type, but yes, high quality. A big plus is that she just seems nice. That counts for a lot.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (ZOv7s)

65 She's married to the son of a Baron. Four kids. Her father in law is in the House of Lords as a Conservative. Must have interesting Sunday dinners

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (j1Y/l)

66 "She's no concern of mine. I'm done with her. (Tucker, too.)
Posted by: Blonde Morticia "

Yeah, Tucker is kaput.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (fV+MH)

67 >>Candace also doesn’t believe in dinosaurs.

Dammit. She's seen through our ruse CBD!

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (fVmgO)

68 Face: 6

Body: 8

Posted by: garrett

So... a 14? Or a 7?

Posted by: MkY at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (cPGH3)

69 Face: 6

Body: 8

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (fVmgO)

Applebees 10 ?

Posted by: jsg at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (QA89Y)

70 >>So... a 14? Or a 7?

I give her a solid 7.5.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (fVmgO)

71 When I first heard this story I did a google search of images of the old hag(?) and thought "could be rabbit, could me."

So I looked for Candice's podcast and saw she had like 2x 1.5 hour podcasts and the description said it was part of her 10 hour "expose" on Bridgette Macron.

Yikes, I decided that the shape of Mrs. Macron's dangly bits was not worth 5 minutes, let alone 10 hours of my life. She could have a Komatsu dual articulated long reach back hoe down there for all I care.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (SdZih)

72 Influencer. SPIT

The new term for narcissistic clown Internet world. Where if you get clicks you can say anything to keep getting clicks! I should start a podcast! But we know my husband and sons would spoil all my fun in talking to myself with an audience of 2 cats. Plus me laughing at the sight of myself, as sometimes once I start laughing it is hard to stop.

I have been known to fall out of a chair laughing. Often choke laughing on a regular basis. Sometimes there are tears, which are the only kind I have: laugh tears or those of awe/happiness/joy.

I once worsened the wreck of my bf/husband's car laughing with my brother during my college daze. Forunately the car was a beater and a mess to start with (I won't go into details, trust me). We were getting burgers from a window, there was a sharp left turn, which I then scraped a wooden fence. This did us in and I had to come to a complete stop later, blinded by laugh tears.

Brother and I were also going to see Blazing Saddles a few years before this episode. A bit lit, both of us. He made me laugh and I drove over a grass median with curbs, which made us laugh harder.

Laughter can be a dangerous thing. But I can't say no.

Posted by: ChristyBlinkyTheGreat at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (6PCLE)

73 I think my penis is Racist or something.
Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (fVmgO)

In general, I'd say my penis is racist. Notable exceptions Vanessa Williams. That Ellie the empress chick is pretty hot (I am a sucker for huge boobs, what can I say?)

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (zZu0s)

74 I will not weigh in on Brigitte Macron's chromosomes but I will say she should wear something more flattering than those shoulder pad suit jackets. Makes her look like there is something wrong with her neck.

Posted by: Chuck Martel at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (Dv3i1)

75 42 She's a hot piece of ass

I don't see it.

I think my penis is Racist or something.
Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:36 PM (fVmgO)

Well tastes vary. Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards

Candace has a decent face. I don't normally see her in bikinis or anything, but she's at least moderately fit, so above average overall. Sweeney is hotter, but she's not a perfect 10. You start adding personality, insanity, etc, and Sweeney starts really pulling ahead.

I think sex with Amber Heard is a safer proposal than with Candace Owens.

Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 06:44 PM (ycI94)

76 Sydney Sweeney is an 8, more or less.

That face, yeesh! Candace’s face is much better. But Sydney does not seem to be the nut Candace is, so advantage to Sydney.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:44 PM (77rzZ)

77 "She's no concern of mine. I'm done with her. (Tucker, too.)
Posted by: Blonde Morticia "

Yeah, Tucker is kaput.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:42 PM (fV+MH)

Why are we hating on Tucker? Don't have a dog in the game. Just wondering.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:44 PM (i24o9)

78 >>Laughter can be a dangerous thing. But I can't say no.

Laughter AND Women Drivers.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (fVmgO)

79 I would lick Sydney Sweeney's sharp elbows.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (fV+MH)

80 "Malice" includes making accusations without doing any investigation into whether they're true or not. "But I believe it!" isn't a defense.

As for harm: She's accusing world figures of lying to the public. That is "harm" per se. Brigitte Macron doesn't have to make the arguments you're claiming she does, that she's harmed because "trans people are bad." It's enough to say this is untrue and diminishes my reputation.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (KRtlO)
---
Ah but, she has documentaries and things, and photos showing a third leg.

Given the state of American defamation law, this is far from a slam dunk.

And Owens could ask if being trans in Macron's opinion is bad. She can't say no, because she's victimizing trans people. It's like someone claiming I was a Marine. It's false, but is it defamatory? Doubtful.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (ZOv7s)

81 I just looked up the dinosaur thing. The AI digest says she has claimed that dinosaurs are "fake and gay," which I admit is kind of funny, but...

I won't dwell on it because I know their are committed Christians who believe that there are were no dinosaurs. Whatever.

She seems eager to believe just about any conspiracy theory that drifts across her transom.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (KRtlO)

82 She wants out of the rightosphere: so, she creates these stupid controversies knowing that she will be avoided, dumps her nominal allies as racist Jew loving buffoons and runs off to do stand up in LA.

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (tLPHV)

83 I might guess it is some sort of progressive disorder because her claims and rhetoric seem to get wackier and wackier.

Posted by: San Franpsycho at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (JvZF+)

84 IF there was evidence for what Candace claims, I could (almost) believe it. Given the craziness of the Woke and LGTBQ crap, and the history of odd sex relationships, certainly such bizarre crap has happened.

Add to that the crazy world of rich people doing nasty and weird stuff, and the true age difference ... sure, it is not impossible. The skull ad bones stuff, the Bohemian Grove thang ... plenty of "high powered" people committing perverse acts.

They claim "BigMike" adopted the kids, seems unlikely, but idk. ... no clue about Mrs. Macron, haven't even tried to look into it. I'd rather Owens actually prove her story is correct, but that seems unlikely. But certainly these kind of crazy stories are not beyond the realm of the rich and powerful.

Posted by: illiniwek at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (vbXSk)

85 So far, this has been my favorite youtube video of the week:

https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=7M8q-qZnv3E&t=10s

The part with the little girl just killed me.

Posted by: garrett

Well, you're going to Hell.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (L/fGl)

86 I’m still on the side you should be give wide latitude regarding speech.

So what if some crazy bitch wants to say this about a public figure

This really is the same playbook that basically destroyed people like Alex Jones and Giuliani. Somebody says the election was rigged and because they can’t prove it, they lose everything.

The Left is always going to have better lawyers and win.

Posted by: Maroon at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (coYo0)

87 Body: 8

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (fVmgO)

Jeez garrett. That's a brutal curve you're grading on. Who gets a fucking ten? Ace in a speedo?

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:46 PM (zZu0s)

88 I would lick Sydney Sweeney's sharp elbows.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (fV+MH)

You'll poke your eye out.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:46 PM (i24o9)

89 The case is being brought in the US. I was mistaken the other day when I thought she was sued in France. It would be funny as hell if this case ended up at the SC and it overturned the Sullivan decision. Sorry spewing crazies, one standard for all

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:46 PM (j1Y/l)

90 Brigitte Macron is a damn Monster, she was his Teacher and groomed him at a young age, I think he was what 12, Candice is a moron but I hope both come to harm

Posted by: Patrick From Ohio at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (1w/tM)

91 I know the AoSHQ position is to hate Candace Owens, but... Macaroni's wife is still a dude.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (dGCAG)

92 "Why are we hating on Tucker? Don't have a dog in the game. Just wondering.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder"

For me it's his position on palestine.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (fV+MH)

93 >>>Face: 6

Body: 8

Posted by: garrett

the body is at least an Applebee's 9. In addition to her bodacious breasts, her legs are very shapely.

She's a bit of a butterface but dat body...

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (KRtlO)

94 10 But
Ace HAS always believed that Michelle Obama is a tranny
Look at her arms !

Posted by: Aliassmithsmith at July 31, 2025 06:32 PM (fP1Ll)

And Lindsay Graham is not into penes...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (ynpvh)

95 Dat bitch crazy.

Posted by: Eeyore at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (od0dV)

96 If we’re going to say Macron can do this, can’t Obama sue everyone that said he wasn’t born here?

I mean, he has a birth certificate, so that settles it?

How many millions does he get from anyone that still questions it and questioning his integrity?

Posted by: Maroon at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (coYo0)

97 OTOH, I love this story and more power to Candice!

She is making Macon defend his wife, and making his wife defend that fact that she is female.

How utterly humiliating for them both.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (SdZih)

98 Damn, guys... the hottest girl in my whole high school couldn't hold a candle to Syd (I call her Syd... she likes that) and the high school gal was prettier.
Attitude is worth a good 2 or 3 points.

Posted by: MkY at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (cPGH3)

99 I've never had trouble falling asleep because of concern about Madame Macron's gender.

Posted by: Northernlurker , Maple Syrup MAGA at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (kTd/k)

100 60 >>Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.

Face: 6

Body: 8

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:41 PM (fVmgO)

Front side: 5
Back side: 5
-----------------
10

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (ynpvh)

101 "Based on everything." Well, duh, Brainiac.

Posted by: Hokey Pokey at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (YlWIZ)

102 I don't care a whit about Candace Owens. She's always seemed like a nut to me.

But I also don't care that she's defaming the Macrons or anyone else.

The media defames everyone it doesn't like all the time, and it rarely pays for it. So tough cookies. Don't expect me to stand up for decency.

At any rate, I do question whether it is defamatory. The left's position is that there is nothing wrong with being trans, and that trans women is a redundant phrase, that they are literal women. So what's the defamation exactly?

You may laugh. But I recall there being some decisions in the early 2000s reconsidering whether calling someone a homosexual was defamatory on the same basic grounds. (I don't know whether there's a legal consensus on that anymore.)

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (guCHD)

103 Tucker uncritically platforms nutters under the pretense he is "just asking questions."

Posted by: San Franpsycho at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (JvZF+)

104 Fire cannot melt steel!

And the moon landing was filmed in a studio!!

Posted by: Imma Bad Person at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (RRCAT)

105 Yeah, this bitch says some crazy shit, man.

Posted by: Alex Jones at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (paSBy)

106 99 I've never had trouble falling asleep because of concern about Madame Macron's gender.

Posted by: Northernlurker , Maple Syrup MAGA at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM (kTd/k)

Neither has Mssr. Macron.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:49 PM (ynpvh)

107 For me it's his position on palestine.

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 06:47 PM (fV+MH)

That's fair.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:49 PM (i24o9)

108 Macron is an idiot but for whole nother reasoms

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:49 PM (J63KV)

109 89 The case is being brought in the US. I was mistaken the other day when I thought she was sued in France. It would be funny as hell if this case ended up at the SC and it overturned the Sullivan decision. Sorry spewing crazies, one standard for all
Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:46

If this goes to trial, which I can't see how Macron would want that, I hope it's streamed so I can watch.

Posted by: CaliGirl at July 31, 2025 06:49 PM (gpah0)

110 The case is being brought in the US. I was mistaken the other day when I thought she was sued in France. It would be funny as hell if this case ended up at the SC and it overturned the Sullivan decision. Sorry spewing crazies, one standard for all
Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:46 PM (j1Y/l)
---
She's stirring the pot, and getting clicks and there is a path to victory for her because she would have to demonstrate harm. What can a rando American say that would possibly harm the First Lady of France?

Is calling someone a tranny actually an insult? Trans women are still women, at least in Europe, so I fail to see the problem.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:50 PM (ZOv7s)

111 So she's basically saying Brigitte Macron is a transgender.

Now why [gets closer to camera] would anyone consider that [Gets Even Closer To Camera] to be an insult? [GETS FACE RIGHT UP IN CAMERA] Hmmmmmm??????

Posted by: Split Adam at July 31, 2025 06:50 PM (qUkBO)

112 Why are we hating on Tucker? Don't have a dog in the game. Just wondering.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:44 PM (i24o9)
******************************************

Anyone who doesn't think Americans in 1945 were prima facie evil is prima facie evil!

Posted by: C. Tarlson at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (cEQOI)

113 Candace always gave off a vibe I didn't like.

Self importance combined with self promotion combined with an actually phony seeming self-righteousness (not even authentic self-righteousness) combined with pure point-scoring for the sake of it.

Not a good combo. And it has lead us here.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (E0p3T)

114 >>the body is at least an Applebee's 9. In addition to her bodacious breasts, her legs are very shapely.

Applebee's Scale is a different measure, tho.

Her ass has room for improvement. I am with you on her Milkers and her legs, tho.

And yeah - Mid-Tier Face is really hurting her.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (fVmgO)

115 Wouldn't this whole issue with "Macron's a dude, seriously!" and the same thing with Michelle Obama be easily solved with a simple DNA test? Even if the "transitioned" the DNA don't lie.

I've always thought Michelle Obama was a rather ugly woman, but is it true that there are in fact no pictures of her pregnant, ever?

On the other hand, the Obama's spawn apparently look like Michelle so that seems to be pretty good proof that in fact she bore them.

I wonder if either of them will, like Chelsea Clinton, express a wish that their parents were aborted?

Posted by: SimoHayha at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (clrIT)

116 ""Fire cannot melt steel!""

Rosie only said that because for years sword makers were forging their blades in the crack of her fat ass.

Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (snZF9)

117 Its a delaware? Court so stupid is as stupid does

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 06:52 PM (J63KV)

118 Hey, if she wants to say random stuff, I say go for it. Say whatever you want. Get lawyers or don't. Have fun! It's not me or my money.

In fact I want her to say more crazy stuff about more people. It's fun!

Posted by: Jork at July 31, 2025 06:52 PM (l3K1Q)

119 There are photos out there with Brigitte in swimwear showing a package. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Dad of Six at July 31, 2025 06:52 PM (w7dKY)

120 115
...
I wonder if either of them will, like Chelsea Clinton, express a wish that their parents were aborted?

Posted by: SimoHayha at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (clrIT)

A younger brother says my parents should have stopped at 2...he's child #3...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:52 PM (ynpvh)

121 Jeez garrett. That's a brutal curve you're grading on. Who gets a fucking ten? Ace in a speedo?
Posted by: Aetius451AD

Maybe peak Kate Upton? Say, Cat Daddy Dance? https://tinyurl.com/333yxknd

I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (ycI94)

122 There was an MLB player named Carl Everett. He did believe in dinosaurs. He was also bat shit crazy. Talented but nuts . Don't think he lasted more than three years with any team. Was later arrested for abusing his children and later for holding a shotgun to his wife's head.

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (j1Y/l)

123 Candace is a 1. My mom's a democrat cat lady, who am I to judge?

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (6cOjz)

124 So she's basically saying Brigitte Macron is a transgender.

Now why [gets closer to camera] would anyone consider that [Gets Even Closer To Camera] to be an insult? [GETS FACE RIGHT UP IN CAMERA] Hmmmmmm??????
Posted by: Split Adam at July 31, 2025 06:50 PM (qUkBO)

Yeah, that's the fun part of all this. How can you defame someone, when you merely think they are a stunning and brave woman who is a woman because who's to say what a woman is or isn't, and shut up hater, if "she" says she's a woman, then that just means she's a better person than you.

To say otherwise would be defamation.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (dGCAG)

125 >>the body is at least an Applebee's 9. In addition to her bodacious breasts, her legs are very shapely.

Applebee's Scale is a different measure, tho.

Her ass has room for improvement. I am with you on her Milkers and her legs, tho.

And yeah - Mid-Tier Face is really hurting her.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (fVmgO)

She has Billie Eilish face.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (i24o9)

126 Sydney Sweeny kinda lost me with "Immaculate."

I watched it. I figured that maybe the claims that it's super-pro-abortion and anti-Christian were overblown.

They're not. It's a fairly well-made movie and it had potential, and Sweeney's acting in it is good, but it is a super-hard-core pro-abortion movie and it's nasty to Christians.

When I started watching it I saw a church doing all sorts of demonic things. I thought "no big deal, the Bible says the devil will disguise himself as being good and will try to corrupt the church, this is just a variation on Rosmary's Baby with demonic cultists posing as Christians."

It's not that. They really are christians, and they really are impregnating her against her will with a baby because they are insanely trying to duplicate the virgin birth.

I won't give away the twist in case you're still interested.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (KRtlO)

127 Candace Owens' husband is George Farmer. His net worth is $180-240 million. This is going to be a good payday for the Macron's.

Posted by: Meade Lux Lewis, Domestic Terrorist at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (paSBy)

128 >>> 10 But
Ace HAS always believed that Michelle Obama is a tranny
Look at her arms !

=====

Am I miss remembering or was there a time when referring to big Mike as Chewbacca would get you banned?

Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (y6eFZ)

129 Yeah, this bitch says some crazy shit, man.
Posted by: Alex Jones at July 31, 2025 06:48 PM speedometer?

LOL.

*golfclap* well played.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (zZu0s)

130 >>I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?

This is my point.

A 9+ is exceedingly rare.

A 10 is almost an impossibility.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (fVmgO)

131 Never forget Tucker got where he got mostly by making (very) funny faces while he interviewed people.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (E0p3T)

132 So what does this Candace person hope to achieve?

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (AOsQT)

133 "LOL, we're getting smeared no matter what we do. The correct response at this late stage is: Bite me, you retard."
................

I reached that point a couple years ago.

The left takes one thing - or one action - said by one on the right and demands I denounce it. I used to. Now I don't care.

"That makes you a racist!!!" Fine. I'm a racist. What else you got? "Bigot!!!" Fine. I'm a bigot. We can do this all day because I don't care.

Posted by: Bea Arthur's Dick at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (eYAt4)

134 She's a bit of a butterface but dat body...
Posted by: ace

I was going to give you a "How dare you, sir!", but after 1 minute of deep internet research, I think you may be correct, at least for some pics. But, hear me out, the fact that in some other pics, she looks kind of hot, makes her even more compelling. A slightly different take on the sexy librarian trope, if you will.

Posted by: Chuck Martel at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (Dv3i1)

135 125 >>the body is at least an Applebee's 9. In addition to her bodacious breasts, her legs are very shapely.

Applebee's Scale is a different measure, tho.

Her ass has room for improvement. I am with you on her Milkers and her legs, tho.

And yeah - Mid-Tier Face is really hurting her.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (fVmgO)

She has Billie Eilish face.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (i24o9)

Bette Davis eyes >>> Billie Eilish face

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (ynpvh)

136 I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (ycI94)

This is rich.

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (jUzef)

137 >>>She's stirring the pot, and getting clicks and there is a path to victory for her because she would have to demonstrate harm. What can a rando American say that would possibly harm the First Lady of France?

your law degree is from where...?

You keep asserting a definition of "harm" that exists primarily in your head.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (KRtlO)

138 Am I miss remembering or was there a time when referring to big Mike as Chewbacca would get you banned?
Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (y6eFZ)

I don't remember any banning but there was a time when ace got embarrassed a lot more by our edgy sexual fantasies.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (zZu0s)

139 Julie Newmar, an undisputed 10.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (E0p3T)

140 It seems to me that the sole purpose of Candace Owens is to malign right-thinking conservatives as some sort of fringe crackpot group.

Does she really have any sort of voice, following, or influence other than what the left allows to denigrate the right?

I can't say I can recall citing Owens for anything of merit.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 06:35 PM (i24o9)

Her claim to fame is basically having a political awakening after realizing that her instigating a racial hoax against some innocent boys was wrong.

Charlie Kirk and his org tried to polish her up to be an influencer, possibly even a politician, but then she went off the rails into full on "Jewish cabal controls the world" schizo.

So she's never accomplished anything of merit.

Posted by: Sjg at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (aqZN1)

141
Not a good combo. And it has lead us here.
Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (E0p3T)

You found the perfect words to describe her bearing.

Posted by: CaliGirl at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (gpah0)

142 81 Ask those committed Christians, or Candace, to explain fossils.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (77rzZ)

143 Please God don't let this case be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Posted by: Justice "Not a Biologist" Ketanji Brown Jackson at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (qUkBO)

144
The Owens-Weinstein thing is nuttier than a squirrel's turd-cutter. Doesn't she know that it's common knowledge that the Weinstein Brothers got their start by heavily hinting in movie negotiations with other Hollywood types that they were Mossad, and still had connections?

So according to Owens, supposedly the New York Moneymen Joos stole a whole movie catalog from the Unbuttoned Desert Shirt Shoot You In The Face Exploding Pager Joos? And got away with it?

Never go full retard, Candy.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (y9nCu)

145 And yeah - Mid-Tier Face is really hurting her.
Posted by: garrett

It's funny, though, because as far as dating material goes, she's plenty hot for any guy. A girl only has to really get to "above average" in looks to be an easy keeper. She seems fun and happy and relatively sane, with a great smile, which is worth just as much as looks.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (ycI94)

146 I've always thought Michelle Obama was a rather ugly woman, but is it true that there are in fact no pictures of her pregnant, ever?

On the other hand, the Obama's spawn apparently look like Michelle so that seems to be pretty good proof that in fact she bore them.

Posted by: SimoHayha at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (clrIT)
---
Pregnant women are not always eager to have their photo taken, and before cell phones had cameras, this was easy to remedy. My mother did not want her picture taken, my Dad ambushed her, and the result is just a blur.

Michelle has said that both the kids were created via IVF, which makes sense. It is very easy to believe that she and Barry never had sex.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (ZOv7s)

147 136 I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (ycI94)

This is rich.

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (jUzef)

LOL

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (ynpvh)

148 Billie Eilish is a good analogy on the face. Languid, lazy eyes.

Iirc, eilish also has a huge rack, no?

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (zZu0s)

149 Candace had a good thing going with the DailyWire and the rest of her gigs, right up until she lost her mind over the Joos.

If Jews control the world, why can't they solve the Palestinian problem that's been dogging them for about 80 years?

You'd have thought that would be the first item on the agenda after completing the goal of total world domination.

This Brigitte Macron thing is really weird and crazy, but a lot of people believe it, including Tucker Carlson, who claims Candace is a friend.

I tried to watch some her "Becoming Brigitte' expose on YouTube, but the thing is like six episodes over an hour long and I got severely pissed she was wasting so much of my time by the end of episode 2.

She beats around the bush the entire time trying to log viewer minutes, and the thing is so disorganized it really hurts her presentation and conclusion, whatever that is.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (6ydKt)

150 139 Julie Newmar, an undisputed 10.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (E0p3T)

Lena Dunham's a 10...oh, that's in binary.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at July 31, 2025 06:57 PM (ynpvh)

151 There's only one way to know.

Posted by: Eromero at July 31, 2025 06:57 PM (LHPAg)

152 What "harm" can a lunatic podcaster possibly inflict on the First Lad of France?
------

AFAIK being crazy or unpopular isn't a known defense for slander.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:57 PM (E0p3T)

153 Oh, no, I guess Brigitte needs to slap around her poodle a bit more.

They should make a stealth game where you're just the president or prime minister of some country and your wife is hunting you down. Hillary would be the final boss, and you'd have to learn her complex ashtray throwing patterns, up up down left left left right...

Posted by: banana Dread Pirate Summer Long Balls Dream at July 31, 2025 06:57 PM (cduTK)

154 >>Am I miss remembering or was there a time when referring to big Mike as Chewbacca would get you banned?

Chewbacca, Worf, Patrick Ewing...

any of these might have gotten you banned by Ace if you caught him in just the right mood.

I had to make a LOT of Kahless and B'at L'eth Jokes to detour around triggering the little guy in those days.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:57 PM (fVmgO)

155 Candace Owens' husband is George Farmer. His net worth is $180-240 million. This is going to be a good payday for the Macron's.

Posted by: Meade Lux Lewis, Domestic Terrorist at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM

With that kind of money there is a pre nup and he is protected.

Posted by: Mister Scott (Formerly GWS) at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (e5NfL)

156 Lena Dunham's a 10...oh, that's in binary.
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia)

The Richter scale.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (ycI94)

157 Yeah, seems pretty simple, have one or three independent doctors take a look at her nether regions and voila! they can say woman or not woman, and confirm no surgery. Not to mention maybe an MRI or ultrasound or whatever they use to see organs inside the body.

Should Mrs. Macron have to go through this potentially embarrassing thing? Not really, but it would solve the issue immediately and she would have medical evidence in her lawsuit. All done and done. If she doesn't though, it just leaves openings for the doubters.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (rvwwT)

158 She could have a Komatsu dual articulated long reach back hoe down there for all I care.
Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 06:43 PM (SdZih)

A preachment, dear friends, you are about to receive
On John Barleycorn, nicotine, and the temptations of Eve
(Bronx cheer)
No parkin' by the sewer sign
Hot dog, my razor's broke
Water drippin' up the spout
But I don't care, let it all hang out...

Posted by: The Hombres at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (R/m4+)

159 >>>This Brigitte Macron thing is really weird and crazy, but a lot of people believe it, including Tucker Carlson, who claims Candace is a friend.

Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (KRtlO)

160 Maybe peak Kate Upton? Say, Cat Daddy Dance? https://tinyurl.com/333yxknd

I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 06:53 PM (ycI94)

Hmmm. Alexandra Daddario in that pool photoset is damn close. Where she is wearing a body stocking.

Kate Upton in the Britney Spears lip synch video.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (zZu0s)

161 Ask those committed Christians, or Candace, to explain fossils.
Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (77rzZ)
---
She converted to Catholicism, so she's outside the normal range there as well. I'm thinking she will become an apostate at some point.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (ZOv7s)

162 shes the black Ann Coulter, only dumber....

Posted by: zigggggy at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (/Pwrg)

163 116 ""Fire cannot melt steel!""

Rosie only said that because for years sword makers were forging their blades in the crack of her fat ass.
Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (snZF9)

I expect to see this post again, soon. Maybe this weekend.

Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (jYRYu)

164 >>She seems fun and happy and relatively sane, with a great smile, which is worth just as much as looks.

It's worth more.

But, we say that sort of thing too often and the Ettes will think we've gone soft.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (fVmgO)

165 I mean, really, a 10 should be exceedingly rare, especially if distribution is like a bell curve. Sweeney is hot, but a 10? Perfect?
_____

Men's looks are probably on a bell curve, because through most of history, men's looks meant close to zero in mating. In this theory, women's looks distribution is probably skewed to the right, i.e. some amount >50% is better than a 5 on the 10 point scale.

Posted by: Chuck Martel at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (Dv3i1)

166 142 81 Ask those committed Christians, or Candace, to explain fossils.
Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM (77rzZ)

There's an explanation.

You may not agree with the explanation, but there is one.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (dGCAG)

167 Hayley Atwell in Capn America is one we do not mention enough.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (zZu0s)

168 Billie Eilish is a good analogy on the face. Languid, lazy eyes.

Iirc, eilish also has a huge rack, no?

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (zZu0s)

That's how I came to know of her. But those eyes. SS' is not quite that bad.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (i24o9)

169 No one ever claims Hillary Clinton is a man. No, sirree. She's a one hundred percent certified real American lesbo.

Posted by: Bill, er, Dinton at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (qUkBO)

170 Yeaaaaahhhh...

Candice was always a little out there. I gave up on her years ago. Used to be she'd say 5 sensible things, and one iffy thing. then it went 50/50. Now it's like 5 iffy things, and one incredibly nutso thing. I expect in another 5 years it'll be just 6 nutso things. never go full nutso.

Brigitte Macron is a transgender? Even if that were true, why should I give a shit? The wife of the president of France is transgender? So? It's not like Bridgette Macron is on the women's Olympic wrestling team.

Posted by: El Mariachi - Attorney at Law at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (gDhA9)

171 All I know, for sure, is that Bridget wears wigs. And groomed her weak husband from an early age,while married with children her own age.

That's all I know. I simply don't care, Candace, as I dislike them both.

Marcron, that dimwit, has now convinced the UK to side with Palestine. That matters to me and I hate him. I hope his wife slaps him around some more!

Posted by: ChristyBlinkyTheGreat at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (6PCLE)

172 I dunno. The antisemite Candace made a good team with the anti Catholic bigot, Ben Shapiro. There’s plenty of interviews with Ben online to prove what I stated. He believes Jesus was a troublemaker killed by the Romans. He doesn’t even believe he was a prophet. He also believes that when the Sanhedrin once again forms all Catholics will be put to death.

Posted by: Billy Jack at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (hzUuR)

173 SPONGE!!!

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at July 31, 2025 07:00 PM (Wnv9h)

174 I don't like Macron and while I know nothing about his wife

Owens didn't make this up, she's repeating the claims of certain independent French journalists who have been investigating it for years.

It certainly seems utterly fantastic at first blush but if one listens to what these French investigators are claiming it goes from fantastic to far-fetched to merely unlikely the more one looks at it.

At first I dismissed it on the basis that surgical sex changes couldn't have been a thing back then, but the investigators found a 1977 French television interview with a woman called "Veronique" whose identity is hidden who underwent the procedure back in the day. They propose that this may indeed be Brigitte.

Let Macron defend himself, a lot of these elites are not worth defending. Wouldn't surprise me to learn he has the same taste in art as the creepy Podestas.

Posted by: Turd in the punchbowl at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (Kijkg)

175 >>>Billie Eilish is a good analogy on the face. Languid, lazy eyes.

Iirc, eilish also has a huge rack, no?

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (zZu0s)

That's how I came to know of her. But those eyes. SS' is not quite that bad.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon a

She was just cancelled by the left for saying, in Ireland, that she likes being in a country where everyone is as "pasty" as she is.

The left accused her of supporting an "ethnostate" and of being a eugenicist.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (KRtlO)

176 >>> Hayley Atwell in Capn America is one we do not mention enough.
Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (zZu0s)

======

Not wrong.

Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (y6eFZ)

177 Michelle has said that both the kids were created via IVF, which makes sense. It is very easy to believe that she and Barry never had sex.
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd

-----------
I did not know that. Explains a bit.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (SdZih)

178 >>He doesn’t even believe he was a prophet.

Hate to break this to you...

Jews do not think Jesus was a Prophet.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (fVmgO)

179 Sydney Sweeny kinda lost me with "Immaculate."

.....

ace
--------

That's a good point(s), damn. I didn't realize she was a part of it. I don't watch movies, mostly just read about them here.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:02 PM (E0p3T)

180 She converted to Catholicism, so she's outside the normal range there as well. I'm thinking she will become an apostate at some point.
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (ZOv7s)

I, for one, am not convinced she doesn't "believe in dinosaurs," just because it's come up in the AoSHQ comment section that she doesn't believe in them.

People tend to attribute quotes to their adversaries that don't always accurately portray what said adversaries truly say or think.

Crazy, I know.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:02 PM (dGCAG)

181 >>>I, for one, am not convinced she doesn't "believe in dinosaurs," just because it's come up in the AoSHQ comment section that she doesn't believe in them.

Google it, google's AI digests it.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:02 PM (KRtlO)

182 If Jews control the world, why can't they solve the Palestinian problem that's been dogging them for about 80 years?

You'd have thought that would be the first item on the agenda after completing the goal of total world domination.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 06:56 PM (6ydKt)

That's the evil genius of it. Like in Unbreakable, you can't be a superhero without a supervillain and vice versa.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:02 PM (i24o9)

183 Sad to see this. I think the real Candace was captured by Hamas and is in a sex dungeon in Gaza. The one on the internet is probable someone wearing one of those Mission Impossible masks pretending to be her to defame the conservative movement and stir up Anti semitism.

Posted by: Darth Randall at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (6V27w)

184 166 And what is that explanation, Burt? I’m open to hearing it. Seriously.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (77rzZ)

185 Ace turning me off of Sweeney and onto Eilish. Wtf

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (E0p3T)

186 Owens has access to decent lawyers. They may be attempting to get the courts to agree that there is no legal definition of man/woman so defamation is not possible in this case.
IOW, make Justice Crayola eat it.

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (6cOjz)

187 Yes in deed that was one of the failings of the last mission impossible where little was done with her character

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (J63KV)

188 >>>That's a good point(s), damn. I didn't realize she was a part of it. I don't watch movies, mostly just read about them here.

i heard someone like Mark Halperin claim that she's self-ID'd as Republican but I can't square that with Immaculate.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (KRtlO)

189 Hayley Atwell

Breasted thang.

Posted by: Commissar of plenty and festive little hats at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (kUHMM)

190 'Candace Owens: A National Concern'

Is this sarcastic? I don't give a rat's ass about Candace Owens

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (3wi/L)

191 159 >>>This Brigitte Macron thing is really weird and crazy, but a lot of people believe it, including Tucker Carlson, who claims Candace is a friend.

Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (KRtlO)

I'm neutral on UFOs, but I thought it was AIPAC controlling the feds, with Mossad running ops?

Tucker went down a rabbit hole over the past year and I'm not sure if he's ever coming back out.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 07:04 PM (6ydKt)

192 I have no use for Owens. I wonder why Macron does.

What's the point of elevating some nutjob on the internet over an idiotic claim?

Posted by: JackStraw at July 31, 2025 07:04 PM (viF8m)

193 Sweeney's a trampoline 10.

Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at July 31, 2025 07:04 PM (jUzef)

194 >>> She was just cancelled by the left for saying, in Ireland, that she likes being in a country where everyone is as "pasty" as she is.

The left accused her of supporting an "ethnostate" and of being a eugenicist.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (KRtlO)

=====

Wasn't much of a fan until I saw her skits on SNL. The Santa Clause and the Business Garden Inn and suites one's were spot on. Better than the regulars

Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 07:04 PM (y6eFZ)

195 Ask those committed Christians, or Candace, to explain fossils.
Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 06:55 PM

We put them there to fool the inhabitants.

Posted by: The Ancient Planet of Magrathea at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (e5NfL)

196 Has anyone asked Sweeney about her views on abortion and Christians?

Just because she had a movie role doesn't mean she supports what the movie says.

Doesn't mean she disagrees with the movie either.

I wonder if she has any real political thoughts other than "I'm hot, and hot women are not per se bad or evil so I'll push back against the feminazi brigade."

Posted by: SimoHayha at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (clrIT)

197 Candace always gave off a vibe I didn't like.

Self importance combined with self promotion combined with an actually phony seeming self-righteousness (not even authentic self-righteousness) combined with pure point-scoring for the sake of it.

Not a good combo. And it has lead us here.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 06:51 PM (E0p3T)

I think her Rogan interview basically knee-capped her ambitions. He shot her down by calling out her story as an overly rehearsed script. Also pressed her attempts to come across as humble.

Posted by: Sjg at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (aqZN1)

198 Let Macron defend himself, a lot of these elites are not worth defending. Wouldn't surprise me to learn he has the same taste in art as the creepy Podestas.
Posted by: Turd in the punchbowl at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (Kijkg)

I'm at the "Yeah, I don't know that his wife's a dude," point, but I'm certainly at the "I'm gonna say his wife's a dude" point.

What's the difference? For one, I'm not worried about getting sued. For another, these are execrable people, and the more they can be "harmed," in the legal sense or otherwise, I'm all for it.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (dGCAG)

199 There are a bunch of folk that don't "believe" in dinosaurs. The libs use it to sick burn Christians.

It's worth noting that there are dinosaur-like creatures described in the Bible.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (E0p3T)

200 I decided that Tucker was a looney when he was on Rogen talking about interdimensional beings are the ghosts that people see. And aliens are absolutely real and Trump knows it.

Posted by: Megthered at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (GOJbT)

201 Crazy Ivan.

Posted by: Mister Scott (Formerly GWS) at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (e5NfL)

202 Michelle has said that both the kids were created via IVF, which makes sense. It is very easy to believe that she and Barry never had sex.
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd

-----------
I did not know that. Explains a bit.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (SdZih)

Explains a bit, but no whether or not he was pregnant. IVF is separated into the conception part the implant part. The implant must still be into a womb. That leaves open, who's womb.

Hey, I could be on CO's team.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (i24o9)

203
So what does this Candace person hope to achieve?
Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 06:54 PM (AOsQT)

LOOK AT MEEEEE! LOOK AT MEEEEE! LOOK AT MEEEEE! LOOK AT MEEEEE! LOOK AT MEEEEE! LOOK AT MEEEEE!

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (y9nCu)

204 What the actual fuck. She and Tucker have been huffing Palestinian paint thinner or something. Jesus.

Posted by: Epic facepalm at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (TbWk/)

205 12
'Especially "trans" "women", those are the best women ever.'

Athletically, they seem to be.

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (3wi/L)

206 >Should Mrs. Macron have to go through this potentially embarrassing thing? Not really, but it would solve the issue
-----

why should people even GAF? The authenticity of Mrs Macron's naughty bits has absolutely no bearing on anything.

IMO

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (AOsQT)

207 Owens is basically a female Alex Jones at this point. Infinitely ignorable and irrelevant.

Posted by: Halfhand at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (u4o47)

208 They may be attempting to get the courts to agree that there is no legal definition of man/woman so defamation is not possible in this case.

I don't think Owens has given the impression of being a fractal-dimensional chessmaster.

Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (K7yuL)

209 i know we all don't like the Macrons but is not liking someone a license to pop off with any unsupportable defamation you can think of?

Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (KRtlO)

210 Suspect has confessed and been arrested in the Devil's Den double murder. His motive was to make off with their two young girls. They died defending their girls. Oh, and also, he's an elementary school teacher.

https://is.gd/CBIBeB

Looks a bit like James Holmes, the Joker/ Batman movie theater shooter.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (L/fGl)

211 I really do think this case is legally defensible. A court has to basically rule that being accused of being transgender is defamatory. There's a non-zero case that judge could reject that as a matter of law given how crazy half the country is on this subject. If the Macrons aren't savvy in jury selection, there's a non-zero chance that jurors with those kooky beliefs could zero them out even if the judge doesn't. If I were still in private practice, I'd be okay with defending this case (but for the fact that it would mean interacting with Owens, who is loco crazy in a bad way in general).

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (guCHD)

212 Hmmm. Alexandra Daddario in that pool photoset is damn close. Where she is wearing a body stocking.

Kate Upton in the Britney Spears lip synch video.

Posted by: Aetius451AD

There's a young redhead with a London agency called, I kid you not, MiLK. You can guess what they specialize in.

https://tinyurl.com/yeymhvzd
https://tinyurl.com/24m7e8tf

I don't know if she's Scottish or Irish, but red hair and fair skin make a knockout combo on ladies. On dudes, though....you get Carrot Top lol.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (ycI94)

213 you guys are aware that people with erratic, disordered thinking will often turn on you?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

214 184 166 And what is that explanation, Burt? I’m open to hearing it. Seriously.
Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (77rzZ)

I just figure it's "God can do what He wants," but it's probably more detailed than that.

I just know they have an explanation. It's not something that will stump the fundamentalists who believe the world is about 6000 years old.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (dGCAG)

215 >>> I really do think this case is legally defensible. A court has to basically rule that being accused of being transgender is defamatory.

well you can keep repeating the same thing, and the law will keep ignoring you.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

216 Too bad a site like "Social Autopsy" isn't still around to dissect all this.

For those not in the know, Candace's old site when she thought she was the hot new thing on the left and was going to take conservatives down.

Posted by: Blanco Basura - Z28.310 at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (lUFok)

217 She’s pretty, which makes her a trap vis a vis dad’s sage advice re dick-sticking.

Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (hlNLQ)

218 42
'Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.'

Right around 2% of them statistically.

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (3wi/L)

219 She was just cancelled by the left for saying, in Ireland, that she likes being in a country where everyone is as "pasty" as she is.

The left accused her of supporting an "ethnostate" and of being a eugenicist.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:01 PM (KRtlO)

Second look at Billie Eilish?

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (i24o9)

220 Hey, I could be on CO's team.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon

-------------
Ah, so you're saying Big Mike could be the *father*!

Now that is an interesting twist.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (SdZih)

221 Calling Candace Owens a grifter is an insult to all the grifters out there. She's a parody of a grifter. Maybe that's her game.

Posted by: Ex Rex Reeder at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (MZ+PY)

222 OK.

Let's imagine Candy prevails, and proves Mrs Macron is a dude. Fine.

Now what?

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (AOsQT)

223 213 you guys are aware that people with erratic, disordered thinking will often turn on you?
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

Yes.

We're here, aren't we?

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (dGCAG)

224 I see that even Megyn Kelly is basing Israel now?

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (77rzZ)

225 Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:03 PM (KRtlO)

Some see movies as just the check rather than a message, but that's old school and pre-2015 mentality, and also I tend to agree when its *that* blatant.

I mean that's totally gross shit and I appreciate your take on it. I feel much the same on all counts including the potential criticisms of people who dress in Christianity clothes.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (E0p3T)

226 there is no legal definition of man/woman

-
Don't know whether to hope Justice Jumanji is assigned the case.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (L/fGl)

227 OK.

Let's imagine Candy prevails, and proves Mrs Macron is a dude. Fine.

Now what?
Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (AOsQT)

We move on to the black "gal" in Lady Ghostbusters.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (dGCAG)

228 >>>224 I see that even Megyn Kelly is basing Israel now?

so I hear. She's attached at the hip to Tucker Carlson.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (KRtlO)

229 Explains a bit, but no whether or not he was pregnant. IVF is separated into the conception part the implant part. The implant must still be into a womb. That leaves open, who's womb.

Hey, I could be on CO's team.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:05 PM (i24o9)

Has there been a single photo showing Big Mike pregnant? Just saying.

Posted by: Surrogacy is a possibility at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (TbWk/)

230 >> I see that even Megyn Kelly is basing Israel now?

Hormones are a Helluva Drug.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 07:09 PM (fVmgO)

231 Well tastes vary. Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo

I don't "get Sydney Sweeney, but I don't think she's bad-looking, either. I wouldn't rate her a 5 or a 10. More like a...7.5? Decent enough, but not so spectacular to merit the "it girl" status she's currently enjoying. She's got big boobs, a nice face, some talent -- but there are celebrities with bigger boobs, prettier faces, more talent. Maybe not all in one package, but still.

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (pMi6S)

232 Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (KRtlO)

Tuck is a crank. He's got the order all wrong:

I believe in Mossad and that UFOs control the US government.

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (guCHD)

233 i know we all don't like the Macrons but is not liking someone a license to pop off with any unsupportable defamation you can think of?

Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (KRtlO)
---
Of course the truth matters, and the courts will hopefully determine it.

But life is to short to care about every podcast nutjob with an axe to grind. Plus, the Macrons are heels and deserve everything that comes their way.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (ZOv7s)

234 Let's imagine Candy prevails, and proves Mrs Macron is a dude. Fine.

Now what?
Posted by: Don Black. Message

I bet all the primitive North African Muslim migrants they've imported will love being ruled by a gay and/or tranny queer couple.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (ycI94)

235 The Left pretends it's only fundie Christians that believe the world is 6000 years old but someone should ask them if they happen to know what year it is in Israel.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (E0p3T)

236 Dark skies people duh

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (J63KV)

237 213 you guys are aware that people with erratic, disordered thinking will often turn on you?
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

I used to be married, so...yeah.

Posted by: Know it all too well at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (TbWk/)

238 Sydney’s a 5 on the Clysdale scale

Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:10 PM (hlNLQ)

239 215 >>> I really do think this case is legally defensible. A court has to basically rule that being accused of being transgender is defamatory.

well you can keep repeating the same thing, and the law will keep ignoring you.
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

So what's the case law you are relying on then?

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:11 PM (guCHD)

240 It's worth the amusement.

Either way.

Posted by: Martini Farmer at July 31, 2025 07:11 PM (Q4IgG)

241 Robert Barnes said he's been telling Owen's to move her company out of Delaware and she hasn't, so now Macron has filed the lawsuit there. She's going to get a jury of Biden's.

Posted by: Ktgreat at July 31, 2025 07:11 PM (33LJY)

242 Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

He's 3 decades behind! Wake up, sheeple!

Posted by: Fox Mulder at July 31, 2025 07:11 PM (ycI94)

243 well you can keep repeating the same thing, and the law will keep ignoring you.
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

No, I think you have this wrong. Sure, "the law" sets out certain standards for what is and is not defamation, and there's a case that could be made on either side of this.

But you know damn well, what happens in a court is NOT about interpreting the law. It's about whose bias is buttered better.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:11 PM (dGCAG)

244 Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (KRtlO)

Weird to think that in hindsight, Fox News ended up making the 100% right call.

Posted by: Sjg at July 31, 2025 07:12 PM (aqZN1)

245 209 i know we all don't like the Macrons but is not liking someone a license to pop off with any unsupportable defamation you can think of?

Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (KRtlO)

Especially since going after the Macron's over the fact that she started an affair with him when he was a teenager is verified and much more scandalous than her actually being a man.

But that doesn't get headlines because it's old news and the hidden-trans accusations are the new hotness.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 07:12 PM (6ydKt)

246 Owens can discover these, but she can't just go on a fishing expedition for anything she thinks that Macron wouldn't want to admit.

Yeah, who does she think she is, a Democrat?!

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (CHHv1)

247 238 Sydney’s a 5 on the Clysdale scale
Posted by: Farmer Bob

She's 5 hands tall. Or maybe 7? Hell, I'd better go measure her myself, all over, and then report back.

Posted by: Moron Analyst at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (ycI94)

248
You don't always have to take "sides" in every situation.

Candace Owens is a shithead. Also, the Macrons are creepy perverts.

See?

Posted by: Soothsayer at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (9X0Vw)

249 speaking of no-aliens, K2-18 like me has no life:
tinyurl.com/w8593hb3
There is however a lot of water, and no steam.
Strange planet, but no aliens.

Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (K7yuL)

250 Robert Barnes is Benjamin Crump without Sickle Cell.

He's a Carnival Barker.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (fVmgO)

251 well you can keep repeating the same thing, and the law will keep ignoring you.
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)
---
Since I have zero investment in the case, I'm good with that.

I've never watched a single video of Owens. She's on the periphery of my periphery, which is probably why I see her as harmlessly nuts. Not a national concern, not even a regional or state concern.

A parochial concern.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (ZOv7s)

252 Ah, so you're saying Big Mike could be the *father*!

Now that is an interesting twist.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:08 PM (SdZih)

I am saying that, if all they are saying is "conceived with IFV," then that leaves a lot open to interpretation, and it is pretty standard obama to let you paint the canvas they gave you with anything you want to paint.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (i24o9)

253 Everyone got a good warning on Megyn. No excuse there.

And yes I tracked her entire path from the *moment* she became the Respectable Right's attack dog on Trump. I said she will run to the mainstream Left via someone like NBC, the Left will reject her, she'll come back to the Right and try and be embraced, and still not be trustworthy. Thank you.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (E0p3T)

254 167 Hayley Atwell in Capn America is one we do not mention enough.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:59 PM (zZu0s)

Did you see the spin off, Agent Carter? Season 2 was fantastic, so naturally, they cancelled it....

Posted by: zigggggy at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (/Pwrg)

255 I was worried if I, ChristyBlinky, had a "butterface." In the past, that is.

No I did and do not!

I don't watch people, but at one point thought Candace was smart. Now, from the little I know, she is nuts.

I "follow" no one. I think this is a bizarre way to spend life. Basically yapping to yourself. I guess it could lead to a profit.

I really should try to podcast. It would last less than an hour. But entertain my family! For free!

Posted by: ChristyBlinkyTheGreat at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (6PCLE)

256 I'd give Sydney a 7. An 8 in candlelight. A 9 just before last call.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (L/fGl)

257 Thank you.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (E0p3T)

Collect your winnings at the window.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (i24o9)

258 I don't always agree with Soothsayer, but when I do it's when he's calling Owens a shithead and Mrs Macron a pervert.

Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (K7yuL)

259 >>So what's the case law you are relying on then?

well, in addition to living through a three year defamation lawsuit by someone I don't even dare mention, there's also just...

In defamation law, "harm" refers to the negative impact a false and defamatory statement has on a person's reputation, causing injury to their standing in the community or deterring others from associating with them. This harm can manifest as financial losses, damage to professional relationships, or emotional distress. In some cases, harm is presumed, meaning it doesn't need to be explicitly proven

You guys asserting that they have to prove that "being trans is bad" to prove harm are just, you know, bullshitting in an internet comment area. If you want to keep on bullshitting, that's fine, but you should be aware that there is a doctrine called "per se defamation" (which I was specifically sued for), which says...

Defamation "per se" refers to a false statement that is considered so inherently harmful to a person's reputation that it's actionable without the need to prove specific damages. Essentially, the statement itself is considered damaging enough to warrant legal action and presumed damages

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (KRtlO)

260 A blue jury would bankrupt Owens and not care one way or the other about Macron.
It is an interesting legal question: is calling someone what they are not defamatory in of itself?

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (6cOjz)

261 she is alleging that Brigitte Macron has LIED through her entire life, and her husband has lied for like 40 years, and you're claiming "what's defamatory about that?"

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (KRtlO)

262 Did Ace convert? This seems to have transitioned from a smart military blog to a smart Zionist blog.

I would guess he did it for the jokes, but maybe it was the chance at that sweet, sweet control of Hollywood.

Imagine Ace in charge of Disney!

Posted by: Turd in the punchbowl at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (Kijkg)

263
Dog chases car.
Dog CATCHES car.
What happens next?

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (AOsQT)

264 But that doesn't get headlines because it's old news and the hidden-trans accusations are the new hotness.
Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 07:12 PM (6ydKt)
---
That being the case, why would anyone be upset that Owens will likely be sued into oblivion?

I see it as a win-win. Either a creepy weirdo is exposed, or defamation law get another boost.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (ZOv7s)

265 raheem kassam has stories on her husband and their grifting.

Posted by: cherries in season at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (1p/Tl)

266 Well tastes vary. Some morons think Sydney Sweeney is a 5 instead of a 10.
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards

Where do these Morons live? Because I want to

1) move there, and

B) see who they're comparing Sweeney against, and

iii) thoroughly disappoint a bunch of the 7s and 8s.

Posted by: mikeski at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (DgGvY)

267 255 ChristyBlinky, we really need some pics, or some ‘Rons are gonna get pissed off.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (77rzZ)

268 253 Everyone got a good warning on Megyn. No excuse there.

And yes I tracked her entire path from the *moment* she became the Respectable Right's attack dog on Trump. I said she will run to the mainstream Left via someone like NBC, the Left will reject her, she'll come back to the Right and try and be embraced, and still not be trustworthy. Thank you.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:13 PM (E0p3T)

I think Megyn is sincere in her conversion.
She's talked about it on her YouTube show.

She started to change after she got sick from the COVID shots, and she's really worried about the trans thing because she wants to protect her own kids.

She's a New York Republican at best, but she still puts on a good show.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (6ydKt)

269 There is one easy way for us to know the truth - macrons wife needs to strip naked live on Tv.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (jouj4)

270 Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace
------------------
It it is such an obvious truth, then let Bridgette drop trou and prove it.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (SdZih)

271
Found guilty. Fined $3.

Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (kqQws)

272 You guys asserting that they have to prove that "being trans is bad" to prove harm are just, you know, bullshitting in an internet comment area. If you want to keep on bullshitting, that's fine, but you should be aware that there is a doctrine called "per se defamation" (which I was specifically sued for), which says...

Defamation "per se" refers to a false statement that is considered so inherently harmful to a person's reputation that it's actionable without the need to prove specific damages. Essentially, the statement itself is considered damaging enough to warrant legal action and presumed damages

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:14 PM (KRtlO)

Not being purposefully argumentative, but it seems to me the latter paragraph essentially negates the former.

Is it "bad" to be trans or isn't it?

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (dGCAG)

273 Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace

We're living in a post truth age.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (L/fGl)

274 The question is not whether The Old Bint Macron is a man or a woman. The question is is she cut or uncut...

Posted by: Foreskin Lint at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (R/m4+)

275 >>>Especially since going after the Macron's over the fact that she started an affair with him when he was a teenager is verified and much more scandalous than her actually being a man.
But that doesn't get headlines because it's old news and the hidden-trans accusations are the new hotness.

True, and more than that, conspiracy theorists are always smitten by what I think of as Action Movie Thriller Plots. real politics are boring for them, they crave the thrills and twists of Hollywood movies, and are very eager to believe any Hollywood Action Thriller Conspiracy Plot because it's exciting to them.

I call this "parapolitics." It's not actually boring earth-bound politics, but it sounds vaguely "political" and it's so much more interesting that drab old facts and arguments about policy.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (KRtlO)

276 Prediction: Candace will settle. She’s way over her skis on this. It’s textbook slander and libel. Candace is somewhat trying to state she believes Mrs Macron is a man and there’s nothing in the public domain to convince her otherwise. Also she can try the birth certificate gambit, and she’s ultimately mentioning that because it’s materiality that proves her claim is false, and further buttresses slander and libel if she continues down that road. It if they prove the authenticity of that birth certificate she’s going to be eating a bag of dicks one at a time next to the other people in Europe who peddled this claim.

Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (4cn2f)

277 261 she is alleging that Brigitte Macron has LIED through her entire life, and her husband has lied for like 40 years, and you're claiming "what's defamatory about that?"
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (KRtlO)

What retrograde thinking. Perhaps she hasnt felt comfortable coming out and celebrating her transness yet. And Canada is just helping her.

Being trans is to be celebrated!

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (jouj4)

278 you guys are aware that people with erratic, disordered thinking will often turn on you?
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)

HOW ARE THE WOMEN I CHOOSE TO DATE RELEVANT HERE, ACE!?

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (zZu0s)

279 Last week when Colbert was canceled I posted yes Jimmy Fallon at least has talent and is actually humorous..

GREG GUTFELD: “I am doing Jimmy Fallon next week and I’m psyched about it. Fallon comes across as a great guy. And me going on his show shows he's not worried about upsetting his peers.”

Posted by: Captain Fantastic at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (VPPG8)

280 She's on the periphery of my periphery"

That close to attention, huh?

Posted by: man at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (tubbA)

281 A blue jury would bankrupt Owens and not care one way or the other about Macron.
It is an interesting legal question: is calling someone what they are not defamatory in of itself?
Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (6cOjz)

Hence, the reason they brought the case in Delaware.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (dGCAG)

282 That being the case, why would anyone be upset that Owens will likely be sued into oblivion?

I see it as a win-win. Either a creepy weirdo is exposed, or defamation law get another boost.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:16 PM (ZOv7s)

I can only speak for myself, but it doesn't upset me.
It doesn't affect me either way, Macron's the president of France, therefore not my problem.

But Candace hasn't convinced me of her accusations, either.
This is all on her, so she is going to have to live with the consequences.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (6ydKt)

283 >>>Is it "bad" to be trans or isn't it?

IT IS FUCKING "BAD" TO LIE TO PEOPLE YOUR ENTIRE LIFE.

ARE YOU DENYING A COURT WOULD FIND THIS TO BE A "BAD" THING TO SAY ABOUT SOMEONE?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (KRtlO)

284 You need to look in to it. Macron's mother, or the woman who is supposed to be his mother, is a pediatrician whose career has been spent assisting trans children get new identities. And that's the least intresting thing about the entire situation.

I was absolutely thinking it was a conspiracy... and now I an fully prepared to believe it.

Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (Ezs10)

285 In other news, just got home from NYC, the city used to be tough an resilient, now if it gets a little extra rain, havoc ensues and everything shuts down and grinds to a halt.

Paid 196.00 for an Uber from mid-town to Hoboken because the subways turned into hell.

Luckily my T&E allowance will cover such things.

Posted by: Thomas Bender at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (XV/Pl)

286 There is one easy way for us to know the truth - macrons wife needs to strip naked live on Tv.
Posted by: Harry Paratestes

Is the truth really worth that?

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (L/fGl)

287 There is one easy way for us to know the truth - macrons wife needs to strip naked live on Tv.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (jouj4)

AoSHQ Style guide suggestion: mention of Macron's spouse shall be presented as Macron's MomWife.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (i24o9)

288 Not to go all Star Jones on y’all, but I aka lawyer and ace is stating the law of defamation correctly. Per se defamation included , historically, loathsome disease (VD, etc), professional competence, lack of chastity in a woman, and in those cases, damages presumed. Tranny not original, but probably would get somehow shoe-horned in.

Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (hlNLQ)

289 Candace Owens did not invent the theory Macrone's wife was born Male. It is a theory which is believed by many people in France.

It is a lot like the theory that Michele Obama was born as a man. No? Go look at the video of "her" dancing on the Ellen show, and there is something bouncing around where women don't have anything to bounce, but males do.

Posted by: An Observation sez Trump is my President at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (Da7Vv)

290 86
'The Left is always going to have better lawyers and win.
Posted by: Maroon'

They win because they have judges in their pocket.

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (3wi/L)

291 The Macrons lied to avoid harm from being the term and yet insist that the term is wonderful, empowering and its antagonist has no rational basis

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (6cOjz)

292 You have to prove damages when it comes to defamation.

Like if you say someone is a convicted pedophile, it’s untrue, and the lose their job over it, that makes perfect sense that damages would be awarded.

But calling someone a man, what economic damage did macrons wife experience? So we can now say that it’s a reprehensible slur to say someone is transgender?

You really are opening up Pandora’s box if people get to be sued like this.

Posted by: Maroon at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (coYo0)

293 And as an example of what I'm talking about, here's a 2021 story about a NY decision holding that being falsely accused of being gay is no longer defamation per se:

https://tinyurl.com/3nmferan

Which means you'd have to prove actual damages, no easy thing in a defamation suit.

Are we at the same place on false accusations of being transgender? That's gonna depend a lot on who you ask.

The suit is filed in Delaware, not a jurisdiction known and a conservative redoubt.

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (guCHD)

294 whatever. anyone want to bet me REAL FUCKING MONEY that a court will NOT, in fact, require the Macrons to prove that "being trans is bad"?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (KRtlO)

295
Defamation "per se" refers to a false statement that is considered so inherently harmful to a person's reputation that it's actionable without the need to prove specific damages. Essentially, the statement itself is considered damaging enough to warrant legal action and presumed damages

Posted by: ace

-----
The problem is that a conspiracy theory has to go against the accepted truth, and the obvious evidence. They all are claimed to be "defamatory" and "malice".

Your standard would put an end to all conspiracy theories, even though many have been proven correct. If it is a lie, let them prove it.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (SdZih)

296 Let me sweep away the fog and the Spanish Moss, and say the quiet part out loud:

Is Ace saying we need to distance ourselves from Candace Owens because the Left is using her craziness to smear the entirety of the Right?

OK, fine, but I must have missed that brief phase of time in which she was hailed by us as a legitimate right-leaning commentator in the first place.

From what I see here, she started out as a sort of unhinged semi-leftist, went further nuts and briefly declared herself based and anti-woke, but her pendulum kept swinging and within months of appearing on the scene slippery-sloped way out into paleo-conspiracy-paranoia land, and has been mocked and rejected by the right ever since. Correct?

She's already rejected and dismissed by MAGA. The only attention she get is from the Left and from throwback "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" level tinfoil hat anti-Semites.

Bu the more the Left feeds her role as the examplar of right-wing lunacy, the more we must vociferously reject her. Correct?

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (pMi6S)

297 "If the Jew did not exist, the anti-Semite would invent him."
— Jean-Paul Sartre.

Posted by: Ms at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (yv+EB)

298 she is alleging that Brigitte Macron has LIED through her entire life, and her husband has lied for like 40 years, and you're claiming "what's defamatory about that?"
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:15 PM (KRtlO)
---
As I said, I have zero investment in this other than the humor value, but I'm not sure living under a new name counts as a lie.

I know women who've changed their last name four times.

An interesting question is under which standard is this to be taken, because French values differ sharply from American ones.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (ZOv7s)

299 >> Paid 196.00 for an Uber from mid-town to Hoboken because the subways turned into hell.

Yeah but did you get a hotdog at the Path station? At least a slice of pizza from across the street?

Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (4cn2f)

300 What retrograde thinking. Perhaps she hasnt felt comfortable coming out and celebrating her transness yet. And Canada is just helping her.

Being trans is to be celebrated!
Posted by: Harry Paratestes at July 31, 2025 07:18 PM (jouj4)

Exactly. Owens should be awarded the Royal Order Of Stinky Cheese, or whatever france gives to people who do their nation a great service.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (dGCAG)

301 >>>Is it "bad" to be trans or isn't it?
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (dGCAG)

=====

Isn't that why Peter Theill lost. Being gay is not bad?

Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (y6eFZ)

302 >> I see that even Megyn Kelly is basing Israel now?

Can someone please explain what the means? "basing"

Is she for or agin?
I am sorry, I am confused by these vague terms.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (SdZih)

303 >>.You have to prove damages when it comes to defamation.
Like if you say someone is a convicted pedophile, it’s untrue, and the lose their job over it, that makes perfect sense that damages would be awarded.
But calling someone a man, what economic damage did macrons wife experience? So we can now say that it’s a reprehensible slur to say someone is transgender?

no, there is a doctrine called per se defamation or defamation per se

I just posted about it

but whatever, just keep telling me what you think about this issue you just started thinking about five minutes ago

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (KRtlO)

304 288 Not to go all Star Jones on y’all, but I aka lawyer and ace is stating the law of defamation correctly. Per se defamation included , historically, loathsome disease (VD, etc), professional competence, lack of chastity in a woman, and in those cases, damages presumed. Tranny not original, but probably would get somehow shoe-horned in.
Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (hlNLQ)

In a sane world? Yes, of course.

In a world in which a US Supreme Court nominee says she can't define what a woman is and stil gets confirmed?

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (guCHD)

305
Think of discovery. Yeesh.

Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (kqQws)

306 Paid 196.00 for an Uber from mid-town to Hoboken because the subways turned into hell.

Luckily my T&E allowance will cover such things.

Posted by: Thomas Bender at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM

Half of that was likely tolls for the holland tunnel to and from for the uber driver.

Posted by: Mister Scott (Formerly GWS) at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (e5NfL)

307 The standard in Sullivan is whether the statement against a public person was done with "malice" which has been defined as knowingly false or with reckless disregard for the truth. The second would probably apply. Candace can't claim she's crazy so it doesn't apply. As for damages , that's a jury question

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (j1Y/l)

308 >>>
Can someone please explain what the means? "basing"

Is she for or agin?
I am sorry, I am confused by these vague terms.

it was a typo, the poster meant "bashing"

i haven't listened to her lately but I do hear she's following Tucker Carlson's lead in deciding the Jews are always to blame.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (KRtlO)

309
* side eye *

Posted by: Michelle O. at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (0sNs1)

310 Is it "bad" to be trans or isn't it?
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:17 PM (dGCAG)

No - his argument is completely consistent. It doesn't have to be "bad" to be trans, it has to be damaging as a lie.

As another example, if a woman wants jobs modeling and you spread rumors she's a man, you damage her reputation as a model. It has nothing to do with being bad to be trans, it's damaging to her career.

Same if a woman wants to sell books as a spokesperson for women which Macron might want to do some day. It has zero to do with trans being bad or good. Its a lie that is damaging.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (E0p3T)

311 Can someone please explain what the means? "basing"

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (SdZih)
-------------------------------------------

It means that someone's finger slipped when typing "bashing".

Posted by: My Ridiculously Circuitous Plan at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (cEQOI)

312 Is the truth really worth that?
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:19 PM (L/fGl)

Heh. I wont tune in either way. Im finding it hard to come up with an example of something I care less about then whether or not Candace Owens is correct that macrons wife is a man.

BUT I will concede it would be hilarious if it were true and that came out in a lawsuit by the president of France against an American YouTuber.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (jouj4)

313 Bobby Bare - Numbers
https://youtu.be/eD8sf0BfM7M

On my scale
they ain't no 10's you know
9 is about as far as any chick can go

Posted by: Count de Monet at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (wVcYX)

314 302 Bob, sorry, I meant “bashing,” not “basing.”

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (77rzZ)

315 She's a nut.

Posted by: Barney Fife at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (vFG9F)

316 but whatever, just keep telling me what you think about this issue you just started thinking about five minutes ago
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (KRtlO)
---
Wait, not only are you expecting us to read the content before commenting, but also to do homework on it?

I don't even know this place.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (ZOv7s)

317 232 Tucker Carlson believes in UFOs and that the Mossad controls the US government.

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:58 PM (KRtlO)

Tuck is a crank. He's got the order all wrong:

I believe in Mossad and that UFOs control the US government.
Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls

No no no, you've got it all wrong: I believe that the US government exists, and that Mossad controls the UFOs.

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (pMi6S)

318 I do think Candace has gone off the rails on the moon landing is a fake, and I unsubscribed from her and Tucker both over their anti-Semitic crap.... she's still got my attention on the Macron thing.

Watch the series, ace. It's highly entertaining, if nothing else!

Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at July 31, 2025 07:24 PM (Ezs10)

319 >>>Think of discovery. Yeesh.

the discovery will be, as I said, restricted to documents and other proofs about Brigitte Macron's birth sex. It's not an unlimited fishing license.

Which I assume will establish that she was born female, which Owens seems to already be conceding by dreaming up a Dead Sister who willed her birth certificate to the male who then posed as "Brigitte."

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (KRtlO)

320 Your standard would put an end to all conspiracy theories, even though many have been proven correct. If it is a lie, let them prove it.
Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:20 PM (SdZih)

Which is EXACTLY what they are going for. To end all conspiracy theories, by bankrupting people who espouse them.

Not because there are no conspiracies, but precisely because there are.

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (dGCAG)

321 zombie: as I see it, Ace is here laying down his marker that the commentariat / lurkers shouldn't be citing this person as a source, or much linking her here.
I know you used to hang out at a certain green site, but this isn't the place where every day you're going to read about what an idiot [such and such a rightist] is. If ace grows a ponytail there's likely to be a lot more warning.

Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (K7yuL)

322 Little known fact: In Dante's ninth circle of hell, Satan has three mouths which chew for an eternity on the bodies of Candace Owens, Bridgette Macron, and Rosie O'Donnell, while Sydney Sweeney stands to one side and gently fans Satan to encourage him.

Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (jYRYu)

323 OK, fine, but I must have missed that brief phase of time in which she was hailed by us as a legitimate right-leaning commentator in the first place.

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (pMi6S)

Yes. See also, @26.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (i24o9)

324 I want Trump to release the Epstein files, and I want him to do it now!

Posted by: David Hogg, Harvard graduate, and 1/3 of the Democrat Masculinity Triumvirate at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM (0sNs1)

325 125
'She has Billie Eilish face.'

And Billie Eilish knobs.

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (3wi/L)

326 i know we all don't like the Macrons but is not liking someone a license to pop off with any unsupportable defamation you can think of?

Does truth literally no longer matter? Shall we now praise liars as prophets, so long as they lie against the right people?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:06 PM (KRtlO)

I have no love for the Macrons, but WTF ? I hope they win agains this low IQ narcissistic nutcase.

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (g47mK)

327 It's sad because Candace is an eloquent speaker; if only she weren't so crazy.

Posted by: vmom deport deport deport at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (dE3DB)

328 >>>As I said, I have zero investment in this other than the humor value, but I'm not sure living under a new name counts as a lie.

good, send your legal theories to Candace Owens, they're very interesting

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (KRtlO)

329 The media is currently trying to hype Tariff Terror Part 2 . OMG Trump's deadline is coming!

Posted by: steevy at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (YwEeS)

330 no, there is a doctrine called per se defamation or defamation per se

I just posted about it

but whatever, just keep telling me what you think about this issue you just started thinking about five minutes ago
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:22 PM (KRtlO)

It once was defamation per to falsely accuse someone of being gay, Courts have revisited that.

Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (guCHD)

331 213 you guys are aware that people with erratic, disordered thinking will often turn on you?
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:07 PM (KRtlO)
---
I think I love you, white boy.

Posted by: Jasmine Crockett at July 31, 2025 07:27 PM (paSBy)

332 @299

>>Yeah but did you get a hotdog at the Path station? At least a slice of pizza from across the street?

I haven't taken public transportation into or out of the city in years.

I used to drive into the city and park, but that became to intense, so I typically park in Hoboken and take an Uber into the city to do my business and then Uber back.

Today I had some Ramen at a noodle shop near the job site.

Posted by: Thomas Bender at July 31, 2025 07:27 PM (XV/Pl)

333 I agree with Ace that Owens will get crushed.
But, my interest is in the legal definition of man/woman being challenged and the question of is being mocked for not presenting as expected by an observer defamatory if the term is not harmful?
Man=trans=woman

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:27 PM (6cOjz)

334 Isn't that why Peter Theill lost. Being gay is not bad?
Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (y6eFZ)
---
No, it was true, which is a defense against defamation. That is Owens' strategy, similar to Oscar Wilde's (which backfired bigly, though it did lead to him repenting of his wicked ways).

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:27 PM (ZOv7s)

335 126
'I won't give away the twist in case you're still interested.'

She has a ding dong?

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (3wi/L)

336 As another example, if a woman wants jobs modeling and you spread rumors she's a man, you damage her reputation as a model. It has nothing to do with being bad to be trans, it's damaging to her career.

Same if a woman wants to sell books as a spokesperson for women which Macron might want to do some day. It has zero to do with trans being bad or good. Its a lie that is damaging.
Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:23 PM (E0p3T)

So then, when you elect the guy whose wife has been lied about, to the Presidency of his nation... the harm is what, exactly?

Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (dGCAG)

337 zombie: as I see it, Ace is here laying down his marker Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM

How do Ewoks do that? Lift a leg? Rub their musk glands?

Asking for the Commentariat.

Posted by: J. Random Moron at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (0sNs1)

338 I dunno. It seems to me that anyone who criticizes Israel is now being called an antisemite. Context matters, and there are a few people for whom you can truly make that designation. But it seems to me there are also a lot of people throwing that term around the minute something Israel does is questioned. They are not perfect, neither are we and some things demand questioning.

Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (4cn2f)

339
Anyone else notice that DEI fake "police chief" in Cincinatti looks EXACTLY like George Soros with a wig?

Posted by: Soothsayer at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (9X0Vw)

340 t's sad because Candace is an eloquent speaker; if only she weren't so crazy.

==

eloquent, like Barack Obama

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (g47mK)

341 Ok well now im invested.

Ace will you keep us up to date on the latest developments in this case?

Posted by: Harry Paratestes - on the hunt for bridgets hog at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (LY3xe)

342 No she does more than just criticize Israel. She has a real and obvious problem with Jews.

Posted by: steevy at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (YwEeS)

343 Isn't that why Peter Theill lost. Being gay is not bad?
Posted by: Turn 2 at July 31, 2025 07:21 PM (y6eFZ)
---
No, it was true, which is a defense against defamation. That is Owens' strategy, similar to Oscar Wilde's (which backfired bigly, though it did lead to him repenting of his wicked ways).
Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:27 PM (ZOv7s)

Ya well Theill had the last laugh on alllll that.

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (MGB5H)

344 Macron is going to have to show her ham wallet in court.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (jc0TO)

345 I'm an antisemite who supports Israel because the Gazans are the worse Semites.
But then I don't like anybody much, present company excepted.

Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (K7yuL)

346 good, send your legal theories to Candace Owens, they're very interesting
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (KRtlO)
---
But that would require effort.

I get where you're coming from, but if you really dislike Candace, you should be happy she's going to get creamed. If she gets buried in penalties, she'll be radioactive and no one will deal with her.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (ZOv7s)

347 the term "woke right."

It's a bullshit term from embarrassed progressives like james lyndsey who are soul-shakingly afraid to acknowledge that neo-marxists are from their own quarter. Neo-marxism is a product of post-modern liberalism and they hate that fact. Being 'woke' is antithetical to being an American conservative. Every fucker like Candyass is a socialist, not a conservative. But James et al have to use them as deflection from their own guilt.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (mlg/3)

348 There is also the possibility that Owens is nutz and the case is dismissed because Owens nutz and up next is the divorce because Owens is nutz.

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (6cOjz)

349 Speaking of delusional, a new Mount Rushmore.

https://is.gd/N6exEU

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (L/fGl)

350 I don't have any problem ignoring whatsername.

Posted by: fd at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (vFG9F)

351 Honestly I don't care if someone believes in Dinosaurs or not, its really irrelevant to 99.999% of life. Its like Dr Carson thinking the Pyramids were used to store grain in. No, that's not what they were for but honestly who gives a damn? Its like Sherlock Holmes not being aware that the earth rotates around the sun. Yeah, its silly to not know that now, but honestly what difference does it even make?

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (dfIr7)

352 We have a weird vibe the past few days.

I still find it hard to buy these nominally conservative people can see 10/7, see everything Hamas has done since, and come down on their side.

It is like backing the Japanese after the rape of nanking. Actually worse, at least the Japanese owned that evil shit and did not run and hide like little bitches.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (zZu0s)

353 zombie: as I see it, Ace is here laying down his marker Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM

How do Ewoks do that? Lift a leg? Rub their musk glands?

Asking for the Commentariat.

Posted by: J. Random Moron at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (0sNs1)

Scat.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (i24o9)

354 So then, when you elect the guy whose wife has been lied about, to the Presidency of his nation... the harm is what, exactly?
Posted by: BurtTC at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (dGCAG)

I thought I already gave you an example of genuine harm.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (E0p3T)

355 Lizzo is channeling Sydney in jeans.

Posted by: AoSHQ Celebrity News Bureau and Rumour Centre at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (0sNs1)

356 >>>Bu the more the Left feeds her role as the examplar of right-wing lunacy, the more we must vociferously reject her. Correct?

i'm being discriptivist, not prescriptivist. I'm not offering a call to action. I'm just saying, she's willing to say anything for attention, and I don't think there should be some kind of Conservative Influencer Loyalty Oath forbidding me from calling a grifter loon a grifter loon.

some of you think she's on your side. I disagree and I think in the fullness of time you will learn that.

but either way, she's definitely not on my side, and I have no loyalty to her or parasocial affinity for her.

are you guys forgetting when Kanye went full Nazi and Candace defended him and wanted to prove that kanye was right?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (KRtlO)

357 It once was defamation per to falsely accuse someone of being gay, Courts have revisited that.
Posted by: bear with asymmetrical balls at July 31, 2025 07:26 PM (guCHD)

Yes I would be surprised if a court found that calling someone trans is defamation per se but im here for it either way.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes - on the hunt for bridgets hog at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (LY3xe)

358 And since the very day I heard about this fruitcake, I thought: Boy, of all the reasons to join the right (or pseudoright), that has got to be the very worst possible reason, and I don't think that shows she's actually "conservative" at all.

More like she's a narcissistic headcase who can't accept criticism so she became a "conservative" because two women on the left criticized her.

Close it up

Posted by Ace at 06:27 PM Comments

This is what I've been saying FOR YEARS.

Posted by: pookysgirl, vindicated at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (Wt5PA)

359 Only slightly related, isn’t it nice to see ace in here actually mixing it up? Seems unusual these days- but back in the day…

Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (hlNLQ)

360 Thank you all for explaining the mystery of the missing "h".

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (SdZih)

361 I dunno. It seems to me that anyone who criticizes Israel is now being called an antisemite. Context matters, and there are a few people for whom you can truly make that designation. But it seems to me there are also a lot of people throwing that term around the minute something Israel does is questioned. They are not perfect, neither are we and some things demand questioning.
Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (4cn2f)

give me an example of a criticism of Israel that you think was wrongly painted as antisemitism

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (g47mK)

362 345 Wow, that’s a take.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (77rzZ)

363
Why are we hating on Tucker? Don't have a dog in the game. Just wondering.
Posted by: Comrade Flounder

=============

I'm not hating on him. I'm just not bothering with him anymore. "What's with Tucker?? Did you hear what Tucker said now!!!" Nope, I'm checked out on him.

Also: The Royal Family. Let them fall.

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (zCv9W)

364
remember BRAT SUMMER!!??

Posted by: Soothsayer at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (9X0Vw)

365 >>Bob, sorry, I meant “bashing,” not “basing.”

You had the perfect opportunity to create and entitely new term and you blew it.

Posted by: JackStraw at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (viF8m)

366 Speaking of delusional, a new Mount Rushmore.

https://is.gd/N6exEU
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM

That must be in that time witch reality thing.

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (MGB5H)

367 Susannah Hoffs feels like making love

https://youtu.be/_rOEf9vF1kc

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (dfIr7)

368 'No judge will sign an order to discover anything that's not directly relevant to the case.' In this day of Judicial activism, were you able to say that with a straight face?

Posted by: tjpruett at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (likVb)

369 >>I still find it hard to buy these nominally conservative people can see 10/7, see everything Hamas has done since, and come down on their side.

All it takes is a few videos (of questionable provenance) of children suffering and some people lose all mettle.

Posted by: garrett at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (fVmgO)

370 359 Only slightly related, isn’t it nice to see ace in here actually mixing it up?

--ssshhh don't spook the shy ewok
just act cool Farmer Bob

Posted by: vmom deport deport deport at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (dE3DB)

371 are you guys forgetting when Kanye went full Nazi and Candace defended him and wanted to prove that kanye was right?

Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (KRtlO)
---
No, because I barely know anything about her, which is why I'm approaching this so casually.

I haven't seen you this worked up since the drill was set in reverse.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (ZOv7s)

372 Meh. I don’t care about Candace Owen’s or the Macrons. Pox on both their houses. Let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (1fKd8)

373 Delaware is a liberal place so jury may hammer Owens because they don't like her politics. It's wrong but that's life

Posted by: Smell the Glove at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (j1Y/l)

374 remember BRAT SUMMER!!??

==

Milwaukee beer fest ??

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (g47mK)

375 @306

>>Half of that was likely tolls for the holland tunnel to and from for the uber driver.

I told the driver what the charge was and after they reimburse him for the tolls, his cut will be $35.00 from the $196.00 fare.

It took around 1:30 to get from mid-town to Hoboken.

Posted by: Thomas Bender at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (XV/Pl)

376 Macron is going to have to show her ham wallet in court.
Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:29 PM (jc0TO)

That might cause a little Disorder In The Court.

Posted by: Count de Monet at July 31, 2025 07:34 PM (wVcYX)

377 zombie: as I see it, Ace is here laying down his marker Posted by: gKWVE at July 31, 2025 07:25 PM

I just had a mental image of an ewok dancing to 'gypsies, tramps and thieves'.

You're welcome.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:34 PM (zZu0s)

378 Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (ZOv7s)

I don't think you've seen ace worked up if you think ace is worked up.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:34 PM (E0p3T)

379 Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:28 PM (4cn2f)

Oh, I agree. Criticizing Israel isn't a problem for me at all, but bee whole Joooos control every aspect of life and that's why things are bad is another thing entirely.

I don't think Candace or Tucker is the type of person who would refuse to join a club that allowed Jews; I don't think they gate Jeeish people or anything. But but they do seem to subscribe to the belief that there is some sort sort of worldwide Jewish shadow state that controls things.

Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (Ezs10)

380 >> give me an example of a criticism of Israel that you think was wrongly painted as antisemitism
Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (g47mK)

I was called that for the first time in my life when I criticized their recent firing of a tank round at the Catholic Church in Gaza. That’s one for starters.

And by the way, I know enough to know what more than likely happened.

For that O was called an antisemite and then treated to a barrage of well, they probably deserved it type comments.

Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (4cn2f)

381 I don't think you've seen ace worked up if you think ace is worked up.
Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:34 PM

Ace worked up involves flailing.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (jc0TO)

382 Meh. I don’t care about Candace Owen’s or the Macrons. Pox on both their houses. Let the chips fall where they may.
Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (1fKd

Are they kettle chips?

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (MGB5H)

383
It is like backing the Japanese after the rape of nanking. Actually worse, at least the Japanese owned that evil shit and did not run and hide like little bitches.
Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:30 PM (zZu0s)

This, I don't get it either.

Posted by: CaliGirl at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (gpah0)

384 351 CRT, it has to deal with someone’s perception of reality. Dinosaur fossils, whatever one believes them to be, are concrete objects. To relegate them to the realm of fantasy is ridiculous. Provide a viable alternative explanation or don’t address the issue at all.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (77rzZ)

385 But but they do seem to subscribe to the belief that there is some sort sort of worldwide Jewish shadow state that controls things.

I'm just asking questions
Tucker Carlson

Posted by: steevy at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (YwEeS)

386 I still find it hard to buy these nominally conservative people can see 10/7, see everything Hamas has done since, and come down on their side.

Posted by: Aetius451AD

---------------
This confounds me.
I keep trying to figure out a way that this is really some kind of twisted op, but I don't know on which side. By any standard of war Israel is justified in turning the whole strip into a golf course or something after they remove all the shrapnel and bulldoze the bone fragments into a pile close to Egypt.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (SdZih)

387 You had the perfect opportunity to create and entitely new term and you blew it.
Posted by: JackStraw at July 31, 2025 07:32 PM (viF8m)

One vote for 'basing' as supporting/bring in favor of.

I am totally basing Sydney Sweeneys new sex tape.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (zZu0s)

388
the more the Left feeds her role as the examplar of right-wing lunacy, the more we must vociferously reject her. Correct?
Posted by: zombie

===========

zombie, I'm not reacting to the left one bit. She went around the bend and I dropped her, that's all. If the left holds her up as an exemplar of right-wing thinking, I just shrug and say what I just said to you -- she went around the bend and I don't pay attention to her anymore.

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (zCv9W)

389 On my scale
they ain't no 10's you know
9 is about as far as any chick can go

Its a bell shaped curve 9's are like people with actual IQ's of 160, about one in 10,000 women would be a 9. That is rare enough that chances are most people would never know an actual 9. 10's are at about the 1 in 100,000 level.

Posted by: An Observation sez Trump is my President at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (Da7Vv)

390 I was called that for the first time in my life when I criticized their recent firing of a tank round at the Catholic Church in Gaza. That’s one for starters.

And by the way, I know enough to know what more than likely happened.

For that O was called an antisemite and then treated to a barrage of well, they probably deserved it type comments.
Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (4cn2f)

Why did they do that ?!

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:36 PM (g47mK)

391 I have a relative that blames the Jews for communism.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:37 PM (jc0TO)

392 VMom- lol! It’s like that time the SDI pulled Sunday duty on Parris Island.

Posted by: Farmer Bob at July 31, 2025 07:37 PM (hlNLQ)

393 I don't think you've seen ace worked up if you think ace is worked up.
Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:34 PM (E0p3T)
---
I stay away during GOP primary season. Don't even lurk.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (ZOv7s)

394 Meh. I don’t care about Candace Owen’s or the Macrons. Pox on both their houses. Let the chips fall where they may.
Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at July 31, 2025 07:33 PM (1fKd

Are they kettle chips?
Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:35 PM (MGB5H)
——

British chips — French fries!

Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (1fKd8)

395 I have seen US military guys that say Israeli rules of engagement make ours seem like free fire.

Posted by: steevy at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (YwEeS)

396 Last I heard, Billie Eilish was into penises again, after her walk on the wild side

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (AOsQT)

397 some of you think she's on your side. I disagree and I think in the fullness of time you will learn that.

but either way, she's definitely not on my side, and I have no loyalty to her or parasocial affinity for her.

Posted by: ace

I was out of the news loop for a while and apparently missed the entire Candace Owens phase of history. To me, she's just some random irrelevant anti-Semite. I'm even sure why she gets any attention whatsoever. I didn't know some people "on the right" hew to her statements at all (except 1950-style paleo-conspiritorialists, who don't count).

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (pMi6S)

398 >>>And it's a statement of fact, not opinion, so it can in fact be legally defamatory.

Only if the "fact" is proven/disproven. Just saying there's a fact at issue, and you have to take my word for what the truth is doesn't get you there. If you want to use the "fact", you have to put it into evidence. Otherwise, we are in the realm of opinion.

Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at July 31, 2025 07:39 PM (p4nXC)

399 "I have a relative that blames the Jews for communism.
Posted by: toby928"

Ummm....

Posted by: eleven at July 31, 2025 07:39 PM (fV+MH)

400 Last I heard, Billie Eilish was into penises again, after her walk on the wild side
Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (AOsQT

I still think there is something creepy with her and her brother.

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:39 PM (MGB5H)

401 The right’s own Jasmine Crockett

Posted by: H at July 31, 2025 07:39 PM (2gjbv)

402 There is a subset of the Right that is almost as anti-Jew as the mainstream Left. Scary. If you've ever seen the sites, you know. They are not many clicks away.

Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:40 PM (E0p3T)

403 Let's not forget what first drew our attention to Candice Owens.

Posted by: Boobs at July 31, 2025 07:40 PM (vFG9F)

404 If you’ve ever been involved in MOUT you know it’s a difficult line to walk on the ROE’s.

Posted by: Marcus T at July 31, 2025 07:40 PM (4cn2f)

405 Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:37 PM (jc0TO)

There was absolutely a faction of radical JINOs that helped facilitate it, and the French Revolution, too. Their kind are still around. Most of them are not religious, however, so I don't consider them Jews.

Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at July 31, 2025 07:40 PM (Ezs10)

406 CRT, it has to deal with someone’s perception of reality. Dinosaur fossils, whatever one believes them to be, are concrete objects. To relegate them to the realm of fantasy is ridiculous. Provide a viable alternative explanation or don’t address the issue at all.
Posted by: Bulg

Satan is trying to destroy your faith. That's one I've heard.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Something Smells Funny In Here at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (L/fGl)

407 My house in Queens to Yankee Stadium is 16 miles. Uber is 60$,

Posted by: Accomack at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (+Bkka)

408 I have a relative that blames the Jews for communism.
Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:37 PM (jc0TO)
---
It is arguably a Jewish heresy that tries to make virtues of the sins of Envy, Pride and Wrath.

Posted by: Ace-Endorsed Author A.H. Lloyd at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (ZOv7s)

409 I told the driver what the charge was and after they reimburse him for the tolls, his cut will be $35.00 from the $196.00 fare.

It took around 1:30 to get from mid-town to Hoboken.
Posted by: Thomas Bender

----------------

I assume uber charges a lot because most people who do that run are on an expense account and price insensitive. Many NY firms have a policy of allowing workers who have to work late or make special trips get car to avoid the trains.

Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (SdZih)

410 CRT, it has to deal with someone’s perception of reality.

Oh, the reason why someone believes in something might be significant, but that will show up in multiple areas. But just that belief about something insignificant? Meh. I am absolutely certain that every single person here is absolutely sure about something that is utterly false and ridiculous or rejects something that is hilariously obvious. We don't know what it is, because we've grown up just assuming it and never questioned it.

It doesn't matter. It kind of embarrassing when you break out the "well of course antarctica doesn't exist, its an old error on the maps" line or whatever but its not like it matters.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (dfIr7)

411 The right’s own Jasmine Crockett
Posted by: H at July 31, 2025 07:39 PM

Candice is way smarter and way more attractive.

Which could make her more dangerous, I guess.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (jc0TO)

412 You'd think she would fixate on the frankly kind of creepy age difference and how they got together as enough oddity.
Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 06:33 PM (zZu0s)

She probably was boinking Emmanuel Macron before he came of legal age, so there's that.

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (1Jemc)

413 I was out of the news loop for a while and apparently missed the entire Candace Owens phase of history. To me, she's just some random irrelevant anti-Semite. I'm even sure why she gets any attention whatsoever. I didn't know some people "on the right" hew to her statements at all (except 1950-style paleo-conspiritorialists, who don't count).
Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:38 PM (pMi6S)

She had a moment where she was help lead the "Blexit" movement. And made good points and brought a lot of people over. It was short lived and where her usefulness stopped. She hid her crazy for a minute.

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (MGB5H)

414 There is a subset of the Right that is almost as anti-Jew as the mainstream Left. Scary.

==

but enough about MTG...

Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (g47mK)

415 And you can't rely on a birth certificate. They can be phonied up, legally. The names of parents, the sex of the child, etc. It's all flexible now.

Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (p4nXC)

416 OK football now

Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (AOsQT)

417 There is a subset of the Right that is almost as anti-Jew as the mainstream Left. Scary. If you've ever seen the sites, you know. They are not many clicks away.
Posted by: ... at July 31, 2025 07:40 PM

Never read the comments at ZH.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (jc0TO)

418 That brief episode of inaanity

Posted by: Miguel cervantes at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (J63KV)

419 nood

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (i24o9)

420 It doesn't matter. It kind of embarrassing when you break out the "well of course antarctica doesn't exist, its an old error on the maps" line or whatever but its not like it matters.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 07:41

Gravity isn't real! I'm telling ya!

Posted by: BruceWayne at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (MGB5H)

421 Nood.

Posted by: Duncanthrax at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (0sNs1)

422 399 Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot had zero Jewish blood. Lenin may have had a smidgeon, but was mostly German and Tatar. And Marx was nominally Lutheran.

Posted by: Bulg at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM (77rzZ)

423 OK football now
Posted by: Don Black. Message: don't fact check me, bro at July 31, 2025 07:43 PM

Day 2 of Fall Camp.

I am dying for college football.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:44 PM (jc0TO)

424 give me an example of a criticism of Israel that you think was wrongly painted as antisemitism
Posted by: runner at July 31, 2025 07:31 PM (g47mK)

lol your entire shtick is accusing everyone of antisemitism including for things that have absolutely nothing to do with Jews or Israel.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes - on the hunt for bridgets hog at July 31, 2025 07:44 PM (kqrPR)

425 @400

>>I still think there is something creepy with her and her brother.

There just two former bible camp kids that found their niche.

They write, record and produce all of her music in a bedroom studio, he's the brains and the drive behind the whole operation.

Their music is not my cup of tea but I recognize their gumption and spirit.

Plus they're not too political, just default left.

Posted by: Thomas Bender at July 31, 2025 07:44 PM (XV/Pl)

426 nood

cafe

Posted by: banana Dread Pirate Summer Long Balls Dream at July 31, 2025 07:44 PM (cduTK)

427 Candace is also "flat earth curious" now, I believe.

Posted by: publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb) at July 31, 2025 07:45 PM (w6EFb)

428 Dinosaur fossils, whatever one believes them to be, are concrete objects. To relegate them to the realm of fantasy is ridiculous. Provide a viable alternative explanation or don’t address the issue at all.
Posted by: Bulg

Satan is trying to destroy your faith. That's one I've heard.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks

That grants Stan the power of creation. And assumes that belief in dinosaurs implies disbelief of God.

Posted by: mikeski at July 31, 2025 07:45 PM (DgGvY)

429 Nood cafe.

Posted by: Aetius451AD work phone at July 31, 2025 07:45 PM (zZu0s)

430 I don't think she's on the right, and I'm not "policing" anything, I'm calling out a low IQ fool, the same as I do every day.

And I'm not worked up about this. I've had the pieces of this story all week. I'm only posting it now because, well, *I need a post for the hour and I don't want to post one of my russiagate posts because we've done two of those today.*
Posted by: ace at July 31, 2025 06:38 PM (KRtlO)

Pity nobody told the Macrons about the Streisand Effect.

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at July 31, 2025 07:45 PM (1Jemc)

431 I still think there is something creepy with her and her brother.

Yeah they have a strange vibe, even for Australians. She's very odd to begin with, I cannot figure her popularity.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at July 31, 2025 07:45 PM (dfIr7)

432 9 I told the driver what the charge was and after they reimburse him for the tolls, his cut will be $35.00 from the $196.00 fare.

It took around 1:30 to get from mid-town to Hoboken.
Posted by: Thomas Bender

----------------

I assume uber charges a lot because most people who do that run are on an expense account and price insensitive. Many NY firms have a policy of allowing workers who have to work late or make special trips get car to avoid the trains.
Posted by: bob (moron incognitus) at July 31, 2025 07:41 PM (SdZih)
——

A lot of Uber’s charges are government fees, tolls, taxes, congestion charges, etc. If you log into the app they break down the cost of the ride. You will vomit. The base fare also depends on demand at the time. Prices could be 50% higher or even more during rush hour as opposed to off-hours.

Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at July 31, 2025 07:46 PM (1fKd8)

433 Hey I thought I saw George Soros at the Philadelphia zoo today but it was only an elephants nut sack

Posted by: Captain Fantastic at July 31, 2025 07:46 PM (VPPG8)

434 One of the points that gives me pause on Owens' theory is that it would make Brigitte Macron 80 years old instead of 72.

And she didn't look like an 80 year-old when she was caught on camera slapping the shit out of Macron.

Posted by: Turd in the punchbowl at July 31, 2025 07:46 PM (Kijkg)

435 Well, you know that old saying about "don't stick your wick in crazy?"

Right here. This is the fundamental basis for the saying. If you see Candace Owens making her way over to you at the bar. Pay your tab, flip the bartender a couple bucks, and RUN!

Posted by: Orson at July 31, 2025 07:46 PM (dIske)

436 She had a moment where she was help lead the "Blexit" movement. And made good points and brought a lot of people over. It was short lived and where her usefulness stopped. She hid her crazy for a minute.
Posted by: BruceWayne

Ahhhh, OK. Now I'm beginning to understand. I didn't now any of that. Thanks.

Posted by: zombie at July 31, 2025 07:47 PM (pMi6S)

437 I have a relative that blames the Jews for communism.
Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:37 PM (jc0TO)

I blame the Jews for gefilte and herring in cream sauce.

Posted by: Kinda gross at July 31, 2025 07:47 PM (TbWk/)

438 So you're telling me Candice Owens invented the Tea App? Wild!

Robert Barnes says that Owens has claimed that Brigette Macron is actually Emmanuel's father. WEEEEE! She's a vindictive grifter who has chosen an anti-Semitism career path as a feelings-based reaction to Ben Shapiro screwing her over at Daily Wire, which was only possible due to her own profound stupidity.

Posted by: holygoat at July 31, 2025 07:47 PM (O+7J6)

439 Seems to me a DNA test could settle both the B. Macrone and M. Obama debates.

Posted by: An Observation sez Trump is my President at July 31, 2025 07:51 PM (Da7Vv)

440 344
'Macron is going to have to show her ham wallet in court.'

A lot of people here seem to have forgotten that DNA testing can answer the question too.
But that is less exciting than seeing Madame Macron's beaver, I guess.

Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:52 PM (3wi/L)

441 'Macron is going to have to show her ham wallet in court.'

A lot of people here seem to have forgotten that DNA testing can answer the question too.
But that is less exciting than seeing Madame Macron's beaver, I guess.
Posted by: Dr. Claw at July 31, 2025 07:52 PM

A DNA test is as reliable as having her doctor testify. Seeing is believing if I were a juror.

Posted by: toby928 at July 31, 2025 07:55 PM (jc0TO)

442 I’m still on the side you should be give wide latitude regarding speech.

So what if some crazy bitch wants to say this about a public figure

This really is the same playbook that basically destroyed people like Alex Jones and Giuliani. Somebody says the election was rigged and because they can’t prove it, they lose everything.

The Left is always going to have better lawyers and win.
Posted by: Maroon at July 31, 2025 06:45 PM (coYo0)

Agree wholeheartedly. Candace Owens is some crazy chick with a flock of bats in her belfry. And one of those bats is Brigitte Macron thing. Why dignify these crazy accusations by suing? All that does is make it look like they are trying to shut her up, and onlookers who would otherwise say, "Meh crazy broad says crazy shit." may think twice and ask themselves, "maybe she ain't so crazy after all?"

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at July 31, 2025 07:55 PM (1Jemc)

443 I don't believe in "No enemies to the Left (or Right)" approach to life. I do believe in "Too crazy."
Don't stick your dick in crazy and don't join a crazy person even if you think it will help you. It won't.
Democrats still haven't learned it. Ace always has.
Ace for JD Vance's VP in 2028!
Send kickback checks to KamiHarriNotRunning.com

Posted by: PTSD giver at July 31, 2025 07:56 PM (KBds0)

444 It seems to me that it would be 100% easy to prove one way or another that Brigitte Macron is a woman......a blood test! a simple blood test......... she either is XX or XY........ and that is all, folks!

Posted by: Monica at July 31, 2025 08:04 PM (kfQcw)

445 I don't think Owens is low IQ. I think she's somewhat deranged and psychotically needy for attention.

She produced a documentary a few years ago on the sham of BLM. It was pretty good. She's talented. She traveled with Charlie Kirk for years, and can clearly think on her feet.

I think something happened when she had a kid, a hormonal dump of some kind. Also, her friendship with Kanye West seems to have hooked her on the anti-Semitism drug.

Posted by: Ordinary American at July 31, 2025 08:18 PM (WHfpM)

446 Ace is losing it over Candace Owens’ unhinged rants, playing morality cop for the right. Enough. Let the crazies run wild—Candace included. “They’ll smear us!” Cry harder, Ace. The left’s been dunking on us forever. Response? “Bite me, clown.” His melodramatic screed cheers for Macron against Owens’ nutty Brigitte conspiracies. Defamation? Boo-hoo. He’s obsessed, sniffing out her “antisemitic” Weinstein takes like a drama queen. Ace, you’re not the right’s hall monitor. Candace is a meme, not a manifesto. Quit whining like a scorned Reddit mod.

Posted by: Miken at July 31, 2025 08:22 PM (dH9FV)

447 But why is it defamation to claim that she's a man?
I thought that was okay now - for a woman to have been born a man - even celebrated.

So, how is it defamation?

Posted by: 29Victor at July 31, 2025 08:23 PM (j6Ika)

448 Candace better get over her aversion to Jews and get herself a good lawyer

Posted by: Gil at July 31, 2025 08:48 PM (qkapW)

449 I mean, in a real country she'd have an easy case. lawyer: "what proof do you have that the first lady of France is a man." Candice: "well her husband is a homo." Judge: "NOT GUILTY!"

Posted by: Rbastid at July 31, 2025 08:54 PM (tJHAE)

450 if there's junk hanging from that trunk you can't debunk

Posted by: Shoey77 at July 31, 2025 09:37 PM (KnU8M)

451 Calm fair take on this: Both sides can lose. Unreasonable take is 'I support the First Male Groomer of France'.

I've seen a pic of 'the woman' and her dead brother. Looks almost identical.

So yes, it could be.

As to dinosaurs, they existed. Romans dragged a 120 foot long skin to the Senate. Beowulf killed what was probably a young male T Rex. Last dinos, not in the water, is in Wales where some farmers killed some flying lizards because they were after the c hickens.

Its the evolutionists who are plain nuts. So many,many, many different problems with their theory. Its like all the golf courses in Scotland, it has so many holes.

Posted by: Eric2 at July 31, 2025 10:19 PM (q7Vou)

452 "What "harm" can a lunatic podcaster possibly inflict on the First Lad of France?"

UKRAINE WILL FALL! CANDACE PREDICTS!

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at August 01, 2025 09:00 AM (kXQUf)

453 67 Don't believe in dinosaurs? What, we can't trust a bunch of tenured plaster pourer with cameras and camcorders?! I'm shocked!

Posted by: Richard McEnroe at August 01, 2025 09:10 AM (kXQUf)

454 I've heard this about Mrs. Macron before, from others. It wouldn't surprise me.

What surprises me is the suggestion the certain documents are relevant. Her children's birth certificates? No. The birth certificates of adopted children are altered to show their adopted parents. Isn't that common knowledge?

Regarding the story about Mrs. Macron's brother, that would be easy enough to resolve. What happened to that brother? If he's alive somewhere that would disprove that claim, right? A death certificate for him would do the same.

The ONLY real way to prove this, one way or the other, is a DNA TEST. Is Mrs. Macron willing to do one, and do so in such a way that it cannot be tampered with?

Posted by: MrExcitement at August 01, 2025 10:33 AM (hOOi9)

455 I wonder if there might be another angle here.

Owens' defense might well be that if it is defamatory to call a biological woman a man, then you can ignore every female-to-male dysphoric's demand that you refer to them as such. Make the enemy live up to his own book of rules, and all that.

Posted by: Daniel Ream at August 01, 2025 12:03 PM (LgYtf)

456 I can’t believe the comments here, they must be curated to only reflect the views of this author. Candace Owens is NOT antisemitic, she’s ant-Zionist, as every true American should be. Everything you said here is misrepresentation of her views and Im very disappointed in you, Ace. Furthermore, anyone who watches her podcast knows you are not being honest about any of it. Well, let’s see if this makes it into the comments, because, for sure, you won’t like it and you wouldn’t want to show that reasonable people can disagree.

Posted by: Pearl at August 01, 2025 04:20 PM (uvkvS)

Processing 0.04, elapsed 0.0417 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0113 seconds, 465 records returned.
Page size 247 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.