Judge Okays Trump Executive Order Requiring Illegal Aliens to Register Their Names and Locations with the Government

The law already existed -- it just wasn't enforced.

A federal judge has cleared the way for the Trump admin to begin enforcing a federal statute requiring illegal immigrants to register with the government and carry documentation. The mandate, which Homeland Security says will be enforced starting Friday, could impact up to 3.2 million people living in the U.S. illegally.
Key Details:
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled Thursday that advocacy groups challenging the registration requirement lacked standing to sue, allowing the policy to take effect immediately.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said those who've been in the country for 30 days or more must register by Friday, warning that failure to comply could lead to fines or criminal charges.
The requirement applies to everyone 14 and older without legal status, including long-term residents and Canadians who remain in the U.S. more than 30 days. Registrants must provide fingerprints and an address, and minors must be registered by a parent or guardian.

The Supreme Court also ordered Trump to seek the return of the MS-13 member he deported.... eventually.

This is confusing. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court overstepped its bounds in ordering Trump to perform his foreign policy function the way this AWFL shitlib wanted.

Now they're kind of saying the same thing... but also warning the AWFL shitlib who is managing the case that she mustn't overstep her bounds by presuming to tell the president how to conduct foreign policy. (Deportations are considered part of the conduct of foreign policy.)

So: Does Trump have to try to get this Solid Citizen back or not?

It's unclear. The Supreme Court is confused on the point.

After the ruling, many on the left claimed "Supreme Court in a unanimous decision: He has a legal right to be here, and you have to bring him back."
It is a bit more ambiguous than that. The Court actually warned that the district court could order the government to facilitate but not necessarily "to effectuate" the return.

The application is granted in part and denied in part, subject to the direction of this order. Due to the administrative stay issued by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, the deadline imposed by the District Court has now passed. To that extent, the Government's emergency application is effectively granted in part and the deadline in the challenged order is no longer effective. The rest of the District Court's order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The order properly requires the Government to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term "effectuate" in the District Court's order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court's authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps. The order heretofore entered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE is vacated.
So what does that mean? The Court disagrees with many, including the Fourth Circuit, that President Trump had no inherent executive powers to countermand the district court's order. He clearly does have countervailing powers that have to be weighed more heavily in the matter. The district court is expressly ordered to show "due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs."
What is left is a legal pushmi-pullyu that seems to be going in both directions at once. What if the Trump Administration says that inquiries were made, but the matter has proven intractable or unresolvable? Crickets.
No one would seriously believe that, but what right does the district court have to manage the relations or communications with a foreign country?

I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either.

Posted by: Ace at 01:10 PM

Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 Prima Moronus

Posted by: Duke Lowell at April 11, 2025 01:12 PM (2UnvF)

2 Roberts' quest for SCOTUS legitimacy became a farce. Whadda douche.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:12 PM (mlg/3)

3 Called em

Posted by: Duke Lowell at April 11, 2025 01:12 PM (2UnvF)

4 I remember when there were PSAs on the radio reminding immigrants that they had to register annually.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:13 PM (jc0TO)

5 Register. Licensing fees.

Posted by: Boss Moss at April 11, 2025 01:14 PM (IBKq8)

6 Supreme Court to Trump: do you think maybe you could send him a map so he could find his way back to the US? Yeaaah , that would be great.

Posted by: Smell the Glove at April 11, 2025 01:14 PM (6TePA)

7 Maybe El Salvador can just say "nah bro, we're keeping him"

Posted by: steevy at April 11, 2025 01:15 PM (KQk9m)

8 "The mandate, which Homeland Security says will be enforced starting Friday, could impact up to 3.2 million people living in the U.S. illegally."

Only 3.2 million? Those are rookie numbers. How about all illegals.

Posted by: Ganowicz Commie Exterminators, Ltd. at April 11, 2025 01:15 PM (Xr4QU)

9 >>>I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either.

Shooting from the hip here, it seems to be saying that while a district court has the right to demand that the government produce the guy (this was a habeus corpus case of action originally, right?), but that the court can't actually force the President to repatriate this guy from a foreign country.

In other words, the court can't interfere with foreign policy, but as a general rule, the government can't just fly people out of the country to avoid producing them in front of the court.

I think. I don't know, whig probably read the whole thing and has a better idea about it than I do.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (uCjyK)

10 I think it means we can invade El Salvador and harvest all the uterusus. Uteri. Each and every uterus.

Posted by: More for the collection at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (TbWk/)

11 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

12 I remember the TV PSAs from the late 60s/early 70s reminding "aliens" of the need to go to the post office and register their addresses.

Posted by: Captain Ned at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (nADdg)

13 Ok illegals , register and then we'll know where to send your fines for being here illegally

Posted by: Smell the Glove at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (6TePA)

14 It's a weak sauce advisory opinion. Roberts mealy mouthed language. He's a pansy at best, and at worst, an enemy of the constitution.

Posted by: Mild mannered citizen at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (2qXmI)

15 "Wait, I just got to register and they'll basically leave me alone? *And* they'll keep going after all the face-tatooed shitheads that are wrecking my new neighborhood? I love this guy! Sign me up!"

-Regular old illegals

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (VoAdT)

16 Let's ask Tom Homan what a good response to the judge might be.

Posted by: Huck Follywood at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (bFU2z)

17 John Roberts has to be one of the stupidest justices SCOTUS has ever had. That's saying something. How much grief would he have saved himself and the country if he just DID WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAID.

Posted by: jmel at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (RWHIh)

18 2 Roberts' quest for SCOTUS legitimacy became a farce. Whadda douche.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:12 PM (mlg/3)

Bad facts make bad case law.

I didn't read the whole docket here, but my guess is that this isn't so much about this case at hand, but about the larger precedence and the normal protections prisoners are supposed to have from overzealous prosecutors.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (uCjyK)

19 could impact up to 3.2 million people living in the U.S. illegally...
The requirement applies to everyone 14 and older without legal status, including long-term residents and Canadians who remain in the U.S. more than 30 days

Yeah, I'm not getting where they pulled that 3.2 million number from.

There are probably 10x that number here illegally.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (6ydKt)

20 9 I think. I don't know, whig probably read the whole thing and has a better idea about it than I do.
Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (uCjyK)

========

"This situation sucks, no remedy is possible, and I'm just gonna kick the can down the road."

Instead of, "Dude's asylum claim is bunk and the Trump admin did no wrong here."

Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (GBKbO)

21 So the order is legal, but the court is precluded from finding any contempt if it isn't carried out?

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (jc0TO)

22 The opinion should have read, "The district court has no jurisdiction in this matter."

Posted by: Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea, Radioactive Knight, Concertina Czar at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (6K6Eu)

23 I wonder how Roberts took the "What is a woman?" question during the newest dumb judges confirmation?

He is "in charge" of a clown show. Real "emperor's new clothes" shit.

Posted by: Francis at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (bbuBP)

24 So it is a suggestion.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (jc0TO)

25 The SCOTUS ruling is clear. Try to get him released from custody in El Salvador. His deportation to El Salvador was incorrect. The district court overstepped its authority. It does not say return him to the US. It does not say he wasn't deportable.

Posted by: Gray_Man at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (Ya6UK)

26 "I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either."

The SC is kicking the can down the road again. The case will go back to that assload judge for more proceedings. Meanwhile, this scumbag gangbanger remains in an ES supermax hoping he doesn't drop the soap.

My prediction: this cocksucker never returns to the USA. The order was 9-0. The idea that the Dynamic Duo of Thomas and Alito would sign on to an order requiring Trump to essentially go into a foreign country to go get a gangbanger he deported there is ... not rational.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (iFTx/)

27 4 justices want to take up the issue of judicial over reach. 3 don't and 2 don't know what they want to do.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (2UnvF)

28 Leftists don't like laws against illegals

Posted by: Skip at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (aHfB6)

29 @17:

But then I won't get invited to the good parties!!

Posted by: Captain Ned at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (nADdg)

30 So what is allegedly wrong with deporting an MS13 gang member - which is also a designated terrorist organization if im not mistaken - back to his country of origin? I am unclear on the argument.

Posted by: Why do we have to keep this shitbag? at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (TbWk/)

31 >>>What if the Trump Administration says that inquiries were made, but the matter has proven intractable or unresolvable?

He fell off my fishing boat, your honor. Swearsies.

Posted by: Citizen Cake at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (CwhoI)

32 The question I have is whether an executive branch magistrate's decision is actually binding on the Executive.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (jc0TO)

33 John Roberts has to be one of the stupidest justices SCOTUS has ever had. That's saying something. How much grief would he have saved himself and the country if he just DID WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAID.
Posted by: jmel at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (RWHIh)

Hey I thought I was number 1!

Posted by: Jumanji Brown at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (Xr4QU)

34 Apparently, he was deportable.

Posted by: Boss Moss at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (IBKq8)

35 21 So the order is legal, but the court is precluded from finding any contempt if it isn't carried out?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (jc0TO)

I think what SCOTUS is saying is that as a general rule, the court can say "produce the guy". However, the Administration can say "can't. He's outside your jurisdiction, and you can't tell the executive how to conduct foreign policy."

So this sounds more procedural than substantive to me.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (uCjyK)

36 30 So what is allegedly wrong with deporting an MS13 gang member - which is also a designated terrorist organization if im not mistaken - back to his country of origin? I am unclear on the argument.
Posted by: Why do we have to keep this shitbag? at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (TbWk/)

======

I think he had an asylum claim to prevent him from going back to El Salvador because of fear of a rival gang.

A rival gang which is now, most likely and completely, in a supermax prison for life.

Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (GBKbO)

37 Maybe Dread Justice Roberts is using a Magic 8 Ball to foretell his decisions. That would help explain the constant ambiguity.

Posted by: Curly Shuffle at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (Vyll1)

38 @32:

C.F. Stalin: And how many divisions does the Pope have?

Posted by: Captain Ned at April 11, 2025 01:20 PM (nADdg)

39 The Supreme Court also ordered Trump to seek the return of the MS-13 member he deported.... eventually.

We deported a Salvadorian citizen back to El Salvador, where he is in the custody of the Salvadorian government.

I guess we could ask Bukele to send him back, but I don't know why Bukele would want to.

Posted by: The ARC of History! at April 11, 2025 01:20 PM (xTIDn)

40 35 21 So the order is legal, but the court is precluded from finding any contempt if it isn't carried out?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:18 PM (jc0TO)

I think what SCOTUS is saying is that as a general rule, the court can say "produce the guy". However, the Administration can say "can't. He's outside your jurisdiction, and you can't tell the executive how to conduct foreign policy."

So this sounds more procedural than substantive to me.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (uCjyK)

So, having not read the order, does it effectively say "moot, but don't do it again for an approved asylum", and thus why it's 9-0?

Posted by: Nova Local at April 11, 2025 01:21 PM (tOcjL)

41
I think he had an asylum claim to prevent him from going back to El Salvador because of fear of a rival gang.

-

Okay, getting de-facto US citizenship because your violent gang doesn't getting along with a competing violent gang in a nation where you all are violent against normal non-violent people is about the most post-2020 I've heard this week.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:21 PM (ldflT)

42 It's nice to have the courts uphold the President's authority but isn't it just as troublesome that the court is the FINAL arbiter whether Trump wins or loses the case?

Posted by: JTSmith at April 11, 2025 01:21 PM (ru6OC)

43 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

The dude ramming his head up her cooter just makes the whole video.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 01:21 PM (Zz0t1)

44 Sounds like the Supreme Court just told Trump he could do whatever and lie to the district court about it.

Trump to district court.... "I have no idea who this guy is. Never heard of him. What's he look like? Hmmm... Not ringing any bells... Gotta picture? No? Oh well, can't do anything about it now!"

Posted by: Madame Mayhem (uppity wench) at April 11, 2025 01:21 PM (2J/Lj)

45 If they are going to make a giant naked chick statue why can't it be of Sidney Sweeney?

Posted by: steevy at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (KQk9m)

46 Sorry your honor, when I lost my guns in that canoe accident the deportee also fell overboard and we haven't seen him since.

Posted by: stuckInCalifornia at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (AXit5)

47 Do non citizens have habeus corpus rights? Honest question

I know we tend to recognize that we should not do immoral things to non citizens, that morals are morals regardless. But that doesn't make it actual law?

Posted by: TexasDan at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (pw5i9)

48 45 If they are going to make a giant naked chick statue why can't it be of Sidney Sweeney?
Posted by: steevy at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (KQk9m)

Everyone's auto insurance would skyrocket.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (VoAdT)

49 30 So what is allegedly wrong with deporting an MS13 gang member - which is also a designated terrorist organization if im not mistaken - back to his country of origin? I am unclear on the argument.
Posted by: Why do we have to keep this shitbag? at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (TbWk/)

I believe the argument is that he hadn't exhausted his legal remedies before the government decided to deport him.

Same way you can't put someone to death until they've exhausted their appeals.

Because it's, at least in theory (as far as the Court's jurisdiction goes), something that is irreversible.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (uCjyK)

50 And, as another moron pointed out:

Never forget that these judges were silent regarding January 6th political prisoners.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (ldflT)

51 So theoretically everyone on the planet has rights as long as they make it to the US and can never be deported.

Thanks scotus

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (xHYkz)

52 I think he had an asylum claim to prevent him from going back to El Salvador because of fear of a rival gang.

A rival gang which is now, most likely and completely, in a supermax prison for life.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:19 PM (GBKbO)

If belonging to a rival banger group is a basis for a legitimate asylum claim then we are fucked.

Posted by: Should be frivolous on its face at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (TbWk/)

53 The SCOTUS ruling is clear. Try to get him released from custody in El Salvador. His deportation to El Salvador was incorrect. The district court overstepped its authority. It does not say return him to the US. It does not say he wasn't deportable.
Posted by: Gray_Man

Nope, no sense in it. How the fuck can a US court determine what country is the correct one? This is stupid penny-ante frippery.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (mlg/3)

54 Remember when Biden let Hamas, Iran, and Russia all hold actual American citizens because...he didn't care?

Apparently their family members should have just sued him

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (t0Rmr)

55 >>>So what is allegedly wrong with deporting an MS13 gang member - which is also a designated terrorist organization if im not mistaken - back to his country of origin? I am unclear on the argument.

Liberals claim that he deserves 'due process' - a term, like their cherished 'living wage', that is impossible to define or quantify.

Posted by: Citizen Cake at April 11, 2025 01:23 PM (CwhoI)

56 How much grief would he have saved himself and the country if he just DID WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAID.
Posted by: jmel at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (RWHIh)

This !!They all swore to uphold and defend the Constitution

Posted by: MAC V SOG at April 11, 2025 01:23 PM (P4Pk9)

57 If belonging to a rival banger group is a basis for a legitimate asylum claim then we are fucked.

-

I want to know how much Social Security he was getting per year.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:23 PM (ldflT)

58 What does all of this have to do with Elian Gonzalez anyway?

Posted by: TexasDan at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (pw5i9)

59 I want to know how much Social Security he was getting per year.
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:23 PM (ldflT)

Depends on which check you're looking at.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (VoAdT)

60 Is scotus really saying every one of the 30-40 million illegals now has to be given a trial and then endless appeals before being deported?

Thats a defacto amnesty.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (xHYkz)

61 I concur

@TheBabylonBee 17m
China Trade War Update: Trump Classifies Panda Express As Domestic Terror Organization

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (mlg/3)

62 >> I didn't read the whole docket here, but my guess is that this isn't so much about this case at hand, but about the larger precedence and the normal protections prisoners are supposed to have from overzealous prosecutors.

But this guy isn’t a citizen, right? What protections should he have?

The fact that’s it’s unanimous does give me pause. Clarence Thomas is usually very solid on this sort of thing. (Free speech, a little less.)

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (l3YAf)

63 47 Do non citizens have habeus corpus rights? Honest question

I know we tend to recognize that we should not do immoral things to non citizens, that morals are morals regardless. But that doesn't make it actual law?
Posted by: TexasDan at April 11, 2025 01:22 PM (pw5i9)

Yeah, it's complicated.

Typically Courts view the rights people have as restraints on government, not as "positive rights" to citizens.

In other words, cops can't get around the 4th amendment by saying "the suspect wasn't a US citizen".

They still need to get a warrant to search his stuff.

But it also depends on the right. Does an illegal immigrant have a 2nd amendment right to buy a gun? Probably not. Does he have a 3rd Amendment right against being forced to quarter soldiers? Probably.

The caselaw on this is a mess, and I'm far from an expert on this particular subject.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:25 PM (uCjyK)

64 Confused? Good, now shut your mouth, peasant.

Posted by: 5/9th of The Supreme Court at April 11, 2025 01:25 PM (BSDOF)

65
We deported a Salvadorian citizen back to El Salvador, where he is in the custody of the Salvadorian government.

I guess we could ask Bukele to send him back, but I don't know why Bukele would want to.

Posted by: The ARC of History! at April 11, 2025 01:20 PM (xTIDn)

-- --

What you're saying makes perfect sense.

to anybody who isn't a leftist judge in D.C.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:26 PM (6ydKt)

66 Typically Courts view the rights people have as restraints on government, not as "positive rights" to citizens.

In other words, cops can't get around the 4th amendment by saying "the suspect wasn't a US citizen".

They still need to get a warrant to search his stuff.

But it also depends on the right. Does an illegal immigrant have a 2nd amendment right to buy a gun? Probably not. Does he have a 3rd Amendment right against being forced to quarter soldiers? Probably.

-

Thank goodness he's not our problem anymore.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:26 PM (ldflT)

67 So the order is legal, but the court is precluded from finding any contempt if it isn't carried out?
==
So basically moot. But they felt compelled to offer some advice on not overstepping bounds on foreign policy. Without defining those limits or giving any guidance other than blah blah blah. Just embarrassing lack of fortitude

Posted by: Mild mannered citizen at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (2qXmI)

68 I have to wonder if Robert's is also playing with not giving up an inch of judicial beach authority even when they are clearly over the line. So the best he will do is be vague.

Posted by: TexasDan at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (pw5i9)

69 I wonder how Roberts took the "What is a woman?" question during the newest dumb judges confirmation?

He probably though she was being "nuanced" and "judicial."

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (/y8xj)

70 11 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

- -- -

That man is going to be a meme for a long time.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (6ydKt)

71 I think it means the president can do the thing but shouldn't gloat about it.

Posted by: Dr Spank at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (noAi2)

72 Roberts:
Watch while I split this baby!

Sane people:
You’re not actually supposed to cut the baby in half.

Roberts:
Behold! I have split the baby!

Posted by: DoublySymmetric at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (TJLr1)

73 Kilmar had plenty of process. Multiple judges have seen his illegal ass. Via con Dios.

Original judge screwed the pooch.

Posted by: Francis at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (bbuBP)

74 "This [giant naked woman] sculpture is about being seen. Women's presence in public art is rare. When they are depicted, it is often through outdated or passive narratives," said artist Marco Cochrane."

So they hired a dude nobody's ever heard of to make this super-important statue so women can be seen. Got it.

Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare." Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

75 I think the Supreme Court intends (consciously or not) to be confusing from here on out. Of course the leftists will invariably vote against Trump. But the crypto-liberal "conservatives" do not wish to be so clear.

I am so sick of this Presidency-on-judicial-parole we're now living through.

Posted by: Ordinary American at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (h/ffs)

76 This is all a game isn't it? It's like political handball. A waste of time over nothing. Doesn't the Swamp have more important issues to deal with? How about worrying over getting the country's economy back on track?

Posted by: Case at April 11, 2025 01:28 PM (OrSPY)

77 When the supreme court puts its foot down, it puts its foot down. When they kick the can, it's basically back to the court of public opinion. And public opinion is swinging in our favor.

I'm fine with SCOTUS being squishy if their every pronouncement is going to be taken as iron-clad law (for better or worse).

Not saying how things should be, just how they are.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:28 PM (VoAdT)

78 Give him a Zoom hearing then tell him to fuck off back to his cell in CECOT

Posted by: Easy peasy, arroz y queso at April 11, 2025 01:28 PM (TbWk/)

79 How much grief would he have saved himself and the country if he just DID WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAID.
Posted by: jmel at April 11, 2025 01:17 PM (RWHIh)

That would violate Roberts' oath to uphold the principles of the Secret Society for Full Employment of Lawyers.

Posted by: Gref at April 11, 2025 01:28 PM (aBgBM)

80
That would violate Roberts' oath to uphold the principles of the Secret Society for Full Employment of Lawyers.
Posted by: Gref at April 11, 2025 01:28 PM (aBgBM)

Something bad happened when he fell off the dock and smashed his head on the boat.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM (Zz0t1)

81 60 Is scotus really saying every one of the 30-40 million illegals now has to be given a trial and then endless appeals before being deported?

Thats a defacto amnesty.
Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (xHYkz)

That's the law. That's why Biden (and Obama before him) were letting people in to the country.

As I understand it, if the person gets turned away at the border -- no right to due process. Leave.

If they make it in to the interior of the US, then rights to due process attach.

Thus why border patrol was ordered to bring people in to the country for "processing" while their asylum claims were being adjudicated.

Because once they're here, it's hard to get them out.

That said, the "due process" here is not like a criminal trial in front of a jury.

It should / could be done very quickly in front of ALJ's. "You here legally?" "nope." "afuera!"

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM (uCjyK)

82 "This [giant naked woman] sculpture is about being seen. Women's presence in public art is rare. When they are depicted, it is often through outdated or passive narratives," said artist Marco Cochrane."

-

Because most of the time it's horrible, which is why they hired you, a male, for this job.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM (ldflT)

83
What is the sound of one law not being enforced.

If a law falls under the Constitution and no one is around to enforce it, does it mean jack shit.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:30 PM (lTWm8)

84 Can we get to the part where President Trump just ignores illegal and bogus rulings of courts?

Posted by: Cray Cray at April 11, 2025 01:30 PM (BSDOF)

85 There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.
Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

Yes, but those sculptures depict women who are not being seen.

(I claim that statement makes sense to a lefty.)

Posted by: Emmie at April 11, 2025 01:30 PM (oZ3Fs)

86 Because most of the time it's horrible, which is why they hired you, a male, for this job.
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM

The chick has no hands. Is this meaningful?

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (jc0TO)

87 That's pretty neat, though.

We can add "public art" to the list along with board games, bowling, pool, long distance swimming, cooking, and all the other things that people wouldn't really think men were naturally better at just because they're men.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (ldflT)

88 IANAL but it's a weasel (apologies to our Weasel) way of saying 'Tranny Spock can order the Fed dot gov to return the gang member but has no actual authority over getting it done'.

MS13 boy is in custody in his home country of El Salvador. Tranny Spock cannot order El Salvador to turn over one of their citizens sans criminal indictment. Tranny Spock also cannot direct Trump to engage in foreign affairs as that lies outside the Judiciary's power.

IOW Tranny Spock can make a ruling but is powerless to enforce it.

Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (Gringo fuertemente armado-Tempus belli) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (WIfss)

89 Exactly. Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (lTWm8)

90
The chick has no hands. Is this meaningful?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (jc0TO)

So, she's got no cock at ALL?

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (Zz0t1)

91 You want my fucking gaze or not, bitches?

Posted by: Males at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (VoAdT)

92
I believe the argument is that he hadn't exhausted his legal remedies before the government decided to deport him.
==
The deportation order specifically said he could not be deported to el Salvador. So it was aviolation of the courts order on destination. He was ordered deported. He got the due process illegals are entitled to, which isn't the same as you or I.

Posted by: Mild mannered citizen at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (2qXmI)

93 84 Can we get to the part where President Trump just ignores illegal and bogus rulings of courts?
Posted by: Cray Cray at April 11, 2025 01:30 PM (BSDOF)

Soon. (TM)

Posted by: DoublySymmetric at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (TJLr1)

94 Even if you are 100% convinced that the guy was wrongfully deported, this is not something the SC should take up. They’re not supposed to get in the weeds on issues of fact.

There’s hundreds of thousands of cases where you can make a case someone was wrongfully convicted . It’s the underlying laws and how they are applied that the SC gets involved

The guy is an illegal, plain and simple. So he’s brought back on US soil and then deported again? How stupid

Posted by: Maroon at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (6lRWO)

95 I officially renounce my Human Card

@DiscussingFilm 21m
New look at Peter Dinklage as Toxie in ‘THE TOXIC AVENGER’ reboot.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (mlg/3)

96 Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said those who've been in the country for 30 days or more must register by Friday, warning that failure to comply could lead to fines or criminal charges.

The requirement applies to everyone 14 and older without legal status, including long-term residents and Canadians who remain in the U.S. more than 30 days. Registrants must provide fingerprints and an address, and minors must be registered by a parent or guardian.

The Trump admin knows this will be physically impossible. They're setting the stage for mass deportations, by claiming that these people didn't register, and therefore can be deported. Judge Kamehameha TRO in 3...2...1...

Posted by: Archimedes at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (xCA6C)

97 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare." Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

-- --

Sam Bankman-Not-Freed basically called those liberal shibboleths that one must repeat to be accepted among the crowd.

That's all they're doing now is repeating the liturgy to get paid.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (6ydKt)

98 Exactly. Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.
Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM

with no hands, suggesting a lack of agency.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (jc0TO)

99 The chick has no hands. Is this meaningful?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (jc0TO)

It was designed back before AI could do hands?

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (VoAdT)

100 Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.
===
In the locker room, after the swim meet, airing out her hairy balls...

Posted by: Mild mannered citizen at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (2qXmI)

101 I remember when I was a little kid seeing public service spots on TV saying "aliens must register." That was over 60 years ago.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (63Dwl)

102 "Women need to be seen! They need to be seen not in 'outdated' or 'passive' narratives! They need to be seen as the stronk empowered girlboss heroes they are!"

"Ok, what should we do?"

"How about a giant nekkid chick with a nice ass and rack?"

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (iFTx/)

103 In other words, the court can't interfere with foreign policy, but as a general rule, the government can't just fly people out of the country to avoid producing them in front of the court.

I think. I don't know, whig probably read the whole thing and has a better idea about it than I do.
Posted by: Harry Paratestes
=========
I did. The tell is in the three lefty judges in the concurrence who wanted Trump slapped down. Dred Justice Roberts kicked it back down the the district court to redo their homework re balancing government powers as to delineate what the district court thinks its judicial powers are versus the already established caselaw about the executive's foreign powers.

It gets confusing as we have to separate out deportation laws which grant rather pro forma hearing before an administrative lawyer (deportation per se of someone not a citizen is not considered denying them liberty for example).

Using the AEA, to deport to foreign incarceration would be considered a deprivation of liberty thus a habeas case to actually determine whether the guy is or is not a gang member under predominance of evidence std I think.

Similar to extradiction of a non citizen from US

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (ctrM5)

104 74 "This [giant naked woman] sculpture is about being seen. Women's presence in public art is rare. When they are depicted, it is often through outdated or passive narratives," said artist Marco Cochrane."

So they hired a dude nobody's ever heard of to make this super-important statue so women can be seen. Got it.

Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare." Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.
Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

Yeah it's a pretty fucking retarded, ignorant, and ahistorical statement. As you note, they're all over the place and have been for hundreds and thousands of years. Roman and Greek statuary and relief carvings and Hindu temples come to mind. Venus de Milo anyone? Little Mermaid in Copenhagen, over 100 years old? This guy's a dipshits who knows fuck all about art and is all about "look at me!"

Posted by: I'm not even an art historian and I know this is bullshit at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (TbWk/)

105 MS13 boy is in custody in his home country of El Salvador. Tranny Spock cannot order El Salvador to turn over one of their citizens sans criminal indictment. Tranny Spock also cannot direct Trump to engage in foreign affairs as that lies outside the Judiciary's power.

IOW Tranny Spock can make a ruling but is powerless to enforce it.
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (Gringo fuertemente armado-Tempus belli) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (WIfss)

They/them are welcome to yell at Bukele, and he'll probably keep posting memes making fun of them on X.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (2ocoG)

106 You know the statue of the little girl standing in front of the bull on Wall Street? (Never mind the unintended message about women if the bull represents strong American progress).

I'm not even going to look at the San Francisco statue but I'm guessing it's ripe for a countering statue to be placed in juxtaposition to it.

Posted by: TexasDan at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (pw5i9)

107 with no hands, suggesting a lack of agency.

Also, a lack of sammich making.

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (/y8xj)

108 that statue is really f•cking ugly

Posted by: Black Orchid at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (Pv3Rg)

109 “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (l3YAf)

110 In addition to pissing off men, the phony strong independent woman op is also good for making regular young women feel pathetic and useless. Mission Accomplished!

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (lTWm8)

111 Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day

What even is this? Please don’t. Not even as a joke. This is like 2 calories above starvation.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (p4NUW)

112 Can we get to the part where President Trump just ignores illegal and bogus rulings of courts?
Posted by: Cray Cray at April 11, 2025 01:30 PM (BSDOF)

Hopefully, he will never -ignore- any kind of court ruling applied to the administration.

Defying a court ruling, however, is another matter.

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (rj6Yv)

113 Posted by: I'm not even an art historian and I know this is bullshit at April 11, 2025 01:33 PM (TbWk/)

You're assuming the guy isn't just doing fake lefty bullshit to cover up the fact that he wanted to put boobies on display in public.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (2ocoG)

114 Trump admin has to orchestrate a "race to the courthouse" with a proxy public interest group assembled to satisfy standing and rush a complaint against the latest EO before a pro-Trump judge who will deny the relief requested and give the Trump admin res judicata grounds to disregard contradictory orders from Hawaii.

This whole brouhaha is happening partly to hamper deportation but also to manufacture a claim that Trump is disobeying the courts as grounds for impeachment.

As soon as you say my scheme reeks of partisan bias you immediately invite that same scrutiny against the Hawaiian jurists, thus neutralizing whatever moral authority they have in the minds of voters, and dampening the impeachment fervor.

Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (GD2xa)

115 The deportation order specifically said he could not be deported to el Salvador. So it was aviolation of the courts order on destination. He was ordered deported. He got the due process illegals are entitled to, which isn't the same as you or I.
Posted by: Mild mannered citizen

/pedant
He was from ES, but the judge and/or the DOJ made a mistake and said he was from Guat. The judge ruled he shouldn't be sent to Guat. So, immigration sent him to ES.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (mlg/3)

116 "How about a 40-foot tall bronze Lucille Ball?"

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (VoAdT)

117 /pedant
He was from ES, but the judge and/or the DOJ made a mistake and said he was from Guat. The judge ruled he shouldn't be sent to Guat. So, immigration sent him to ES.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:35 PM (mlg/3)

For fuck's aches just shoot the bastard and put him in a hole already.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (VoAdT)

118 I'm not even going to look at the San Francisco statue but I'm guessing it's ripe for a countering statue to be placed in juxtaposition to it.

The countering statue will be a homeless man masturbating....

Posted by: steevy at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (KQk9m)

119 The Trump admin knows this will be physically impossible. They're setting the stage for mass deportations, by claiming that these people didn't register, and therefore can be deported. Judge Kamehameha TRO in 3...2...1...
Posted by: Archimedes at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (xCA6C)

When they come to register: deport them.

Anyone who didn’t register: deport them.

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (l3YAf)

120 81 60 Is scotus really saying every one of the 30-40 million illegals now has to be given a trial and then endless appeals before being deported?

Thats a defacto amnesty.
Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:24 PM (xHYkz)

That's the law. That's why Biden (and Obama before him) were letting people in to the country.

As I understand it, if the person gets turned away at the border -- no right to due process. Leave.

If they make it in to the interior of the US, then rights to due process attach.

Thus why border patrol was ordered to bring people in to the country for "processing" while their asylum claims were being adjudicated.

Because once they're here, it's hard to get them out.

That said, the "due process" here is not like a criminal trial in front of a jury.

It should / could be done very quickly in front of ALJ's. "You here legally?" "nope." "afuera!"

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM (uCjyK)

Yep. These scumbags will be continually moved to the head of the line for deportation hearings.

Posted by: Gref at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (aBgBM)

121 deported a Salvadorian citizen back to El Salvador, where he is in the custody of the Salvadorian government.

I guess we could ask Bukele to send him back, but I don't know why Bukele would want to.
==
Happy to do so, after he has served his life term for drug trafficking, murder etc etc.

Posted by: Reality in ElSalvador at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (2qXmI)

122 I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either.

Posted by: Ace at 01:10 PM

---------------

It almost sounds intentionally ambiguous. Almost ...

Posted by: ShainS -- On Democracies and Death Cults at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (jcbZW)

123 The Court actually warned that the district court could order the government to facilitate but not necessarily "to effectuate" the return.

Leave a saddled horse outside of the jail and wish him luck.

Posted by: Paco at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (mADJX)

124 8 Exactly. Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.
Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM

with no hands, suggesting a lack of agency.
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (jc0TO)

They don't have agency. Or at least, accountability. They do something "good" it's because stronk independent voman. They do something anywhere from somewhat antisocial to horrifically evil, it's men's fault because patriarchy. They have almost god-like status in this regard.

Posted by: Life without consequence at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (TbWk/)

125 I remember when I was a little kid seeing public service spots on TV saying "aliens must register." That was over 60 years ago.

I'm almost as 29 as some of y'all and I don't remember that at all. And I lived in south Texas.

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (/y8xj)

126 Or, as its a day ending in Y, Chief Justice Roberts gives the Supreme Court an excuse not to make a clear decision.

Just like Guns... hell, even Abortion (he punted that decision back to the States, correct, but shows how this court thinks).

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (QAkQ3)

127 This is confusing. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court overstepped its bounds in ordering Trump to perform his foreign policy function the way this AWFL shitlib wanted.

Now they're kind of saying the same thing... but also warning the AWFL shitlib who is managing the case that she mustn't overstep her bounds by presuming to tell the president how to conduct foreign policy. (Deportations are considered part of the conduct of foreign policy.)

Breaking: WH COS Steven Miller announced a little while ago
Hey Scrunt first you will blow me
Then STFD and STFU!

Posted by: I was Gumby Damn It! now I'm no0t at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (ERlZL)

128 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare."

*cough*

Posted by: Mona Lisa and Statue of Liberty at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (xCA6C)

129 The only right a legal non-resident citizen has is the right to leave (assuming he hasn't been convicted of a crime)

Illegal aliens/invaders/foreign military members are by definition here illegally and so they don't even have that right. The president can have the military round them up, shoot them, or catapult them over the border - its solely up to him.

These arguments the courts are raising are easily dispelled by asking what courts stopped FDR during WWII from doing the same to our "Japanese undocumented immigrants" at the time.

Why does Juan the MS-13 member have protections Kenji IJA member did not?

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (t0Rmr)

130 John Roberts has to be one of the stupidest justices SCOTUS has ever had. That's saying something. How much grief would he have saved himself and the country if he just DID WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAID.

--

We'd be better off with an AI that was fed the exact wording of the Constitution and let it decide based on the contents of the language itself.

Posted by: Lady in Black at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (qBdHI)

131 The Trump admin knows this will be physically impossible. They're setting the stage for mass deportations, by claiming that these people didn't register, and therefore can be deported. Judge Kamehameha TRO in 3...2...1...
Posted by: Archimedes
=====
A judge might try to do so but guess what, even criminals have to fill out a 4473 firearms form to illegally buy a firearm. If they fill it out and lie, they get prosecuted as a banned person, if they do not fill it out, then they can be prosecuted for buying firearm illegally.

The registration act dates to WWII like the last application of the AEA (last applied postwar in 1946). The registration law was passed in 1940 aka Smith Act which is the Alien Registration Act.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (ctrM5)

132 Exactly. Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.
--

with no hands, suggesting a lack of agency.
Posted by: Grump928(C)

-

AIN'T NEED NO HANDS

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:38 PM (ldflT)

133 @DiscussingFilm 21m
New look at Peter Dinklage as Toxie in ‘THE TOXIC AVENGER’ reboot.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:32 PM (mlg/3)

- -- -

You can't even tell it's him through all the make-up sfx.

https://tinyurl.com/mdnf56cj
(ew.com)

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:38 PM (6ydKt)

134 We'd be better off with an AI that was fed the exact wording of the Constitution and let it decide based on the contents of the language itself.

Posted by: Lady in Black
========
Judges have no one to blame but themselves for their coming loss of power.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:38 PM (ctrM5)

135 128 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare."

*cough*
Posted by: Mona Lisa and Statue of Liberty at

This was funny to me, too. Because women are all over art from the dawn of time - because our form is something men have been fascinated with since the dawn of time.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:38 PM (p4NUW)

136 Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:29 PM (uCjyK)

So what legal justification let them get away with Project Wetback in the late 40's? Seems like we have a precedent that worked then.

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (QAkQ3)

137 Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day

What even is this? Please don’t. Not even as a joke. This is like 2 calories above starvation.
Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (p4NUW)

1200 calories is actual starvation, I think. Hell, I need something like 3200 calories a day to maintain my weight. I know wimmenz have slower metabolisms, but jeez.

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (l3YAf)

138 When they come to register: deport them.

Anyone who didn’t register: FINE AND deport them.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (jc0TO)

139 We'd be better off with an AI that was fed the exact wording of the Constitution and let it decide based on the contents of the language itself.

Posted by: Lady in Black at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (qBdHI)

I concur.

Posted by: Ordinary American at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (h/ffs)

140 The illegals not registering is also another nail in the coffin on the criminality.

Most any sort of dreamer amnesty bullshit is almost always predicated on them not having criminal records.

Keeping these people in the shadows also helps keep them from voting and getting gov benefits

I also like the $1k a day fine , hope that happens if it’s law already

Posted by: Maroon at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (6lRWO)

141
So what legal justification let them get away with Project Wetback in the late 40's? Seems like we have a precedent that worked then.

Because if the courts had done this to Ike he would have had them arrested and tried for treason.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (t0Rmr)

142 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare."

*cough*
Posted by: Mona Lisa and Statue of Liberty at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (xCA6C)

That reminds me ... When are we going to see Harriet Tubman's image on the double sawbuck?

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (rj6Yv)

143 It's kind of true in a way....

Women's presence in brutalist, horrible, post-industrial "public" "art" actually is kind of rare. Because a bunch of shitheads yanked and destroyed all the good pieces that were made when art that was public was not depressing creepy shit.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (VoAdT)

144 @TheBabylonBee 17m
China Trade War Update: Trump Classifies Panda Express As Domestic Terror Organization
Posted by: weft cut-loop

China is fighting dirty now.

Is China Behind These AI-Generated Videos of Fat Americans in Sweatshops?

https://shorturl.at/1kMl3

https://shorturl.at/bT1xP

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (L/fGl)

145 >> A judge might try to do so but guess what, even criminals have to fill out a 4473 firearms form to illegally buy a firearm. If they fill it out and lie, they get prosecuted as a banned person, if they do not fill it out, then they can be prosecuted for buying firearm illegally.

You don’t need a 4473 if it’s a private sale.

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (l3YAf)

146 129 The only right a legal non-resident citizen has is the right to leave (assuming he hasn't been convicted of a crime)

Illegal aliens/invaders/foreign military members are by definition here illegally and so they don't even have that right. The president can have the military round them up, shoot them, or catapult them over the border - its solely up to him.

These arguments the courts are raising are easily dispelled by asking what courts stopped FDR during WWII from doing the same to our "Japanese undocumented immigrants" at the time.

Why does Juan the MS-13 member have protections Kenji IJA member did not?

Posted by: 18-1
======
Not true, legal aliens actually have the same Bill of Rights that citizens do except voting.

The only exception is that if they lied on forms, commit crimes, etc. they can lose their legal residence rights and be deported.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (ctrM5)

147 Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day

What even is this? Please don’t. Not even as a joke. This is like 2 calories above starvation.
Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (p4NUW)

1200 calories is actual starvation, I think. Hell, I need something like 3200 calories a day to maintain my weight. I know wimmenz have slower metabolisms, but jeez.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (l3YAf)
_______

"Amateurs! I eat 17,000 calories a day, and everyone still calls me beautiful!"

-- Lizzo

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (iFTx/)

148 That reminds me ... When are we going to see Harriet Tubman's image on the double sawbuck?
Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (rj6Yv)

The day after we get Mayor Pete's Alfred E Newman lookin' mug on the three dollar bill.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (VoAdT)

149 We'd be better off with an AI that was fed the exact wording of the Constitution and let it decide based on the contents of the language itself.

Remember when AI would generate images of black George Washington? It isn't neutral: it reflects the biases of the people who program it.

Posted by: Archimedes at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (xCA6C)

150 Top. Men.

Posted by: Deplorable Minion at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (QSrLX)

151 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

WTF?? That's hilarious. LOL!!

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (5xuJ/)

152 Facilitate/effectuate his return?

OK, done.

What a stupid f'ing order. What a bunch of retards. You can do nothing, and say maybe maintain an existing program to accept a foreign national, or even maintain the existing infrastructure to do so, and meet the letter of the order.

Retards.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (i24o9)

153 So undocumented legally can become documented and yet still be illegal as documented illegal aliens. This is perfect for our continued obfuscation!
- Media

Posted by: Chuck Martel at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (Dv3i1)

154 I was actually surprised to see the woman's body be appealing and feminine. Much worse things for the libs to subject us to.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (lTWm8)

155 That reminds me ... When are we going to see Harriet Tubman's image on the double sawbuck?

As long as the image includes her carrying a shotgun, like usual. Jared Polis would pee himself.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (2ocoG)

156 Why does Juan the MS-13 member have protections Kenji IJA member did not?

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (t0Rmr)

-- --

Because these Democrats need votes.
Whereas FDR didn't care one bit who the Japanese voted for.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (6ydKt)

157 Is China Behind These AI-Generated Videos of Fat Americans in Sweatshops?

Like the idea of that is supposed to make me oppose Trump?

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (/y8xj)

158 OH, wait, you want to register your kids for school? Can I see some ID? oh, your not here legally? Can I see your illegal alien registration card?

Oh... you don't have one... sorry... no soup for you.

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (QAkQ3)

159 So what legal justification let them get away with Project Wetback in the late 40's? Seems like we have a precedent that worked then.
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (QAkQ3)

I don't know the specifics, but I imagine they gave them some kind of due process. Even if it was perfunctory.

The idea is the person should have the right to say "your Honor, they got the wrong guy! I'm a US citizen, I was born in Cleveland!" before he was kicked out of the country.

But also, that was the era of Japanese internment camps by executive order and SCOTUS said "sounds good to us" so who knows?

I've never really looked in to it, to be honest.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (uCjyK)

160 You don’t need a 4473 if it’s a private sale.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director

Read the last sentence again. If they buy a firearm without filling out the form aka private sale in some states, they are still committing a crime because they are a forbidden person under the GCA (and possibly NFA depending on the item). If a felon goes and answers on a 4473 honestly that they are a felon and the firearm dealer sells them the firearm, then it is the firearm dealer committing the crime.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (ctrM5)

161 Judge 1: can’t deport an illegal to country X

Ok well deport him to country Y

Judge 2; that’s cruel and inhumane the illegal has no association with country Y

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (xHYkz)

162 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

WTF?? That's hilarious. LOL!!

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (5xuJ/)

Guys spend 9 months getting out . . . .

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (i24o9)

163 As long as the image includes her carrying a shotgun, like usual. Jared Polis would pee himself.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (2ocoG)

Shotgun or Colt 1851 Navy revolver.

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (rj6Yv)

164 I'm not even going to look at the San Francisco statue but I'm guessing it's ripe for a countering statue to be placed in juxtaposition to it.

The countering statue will be a homeless man masturbating....
Posted by: steevy at April 11, 2025 01:36 PM (KQk9m

Ten bucks says they'll find a live homeless man masturbating in juxtaposition to that statue.

Posted by: gotta work with what you got at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (TbWk/)

165 I'll be in my bunk

@LeadingReport
·
7m
BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (mlg/3)

166
I don't see how "Look they're gonna treat their people like we treat ours except they will also feed them" is a quality burn, but let China be China.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (lTWm8)

167 You don’t need a 4473 if it’s a private sale.

IIRC, some states including CA, require all transfers to go through a FFL with a 4473 and a NICS check.

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (/y8xj)

168 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare."

*cough*
Posted by: Mona Lisa and Statue of Liberty at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM

Made by white men!!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!

- Feminazis everywhere

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (kgE5c)

169 Send a message to El Salvador and ask if they could send the guy back.

El Salvador says: "nah, bro."

And that's fucking that. The judge then has to drop the entire case, because she can't force anyone to do anything else.

Posted by: El Mariachi at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (gDhA9)

170 Not true, legal aliens actually have the same Bill of Rights that citizens do except voting.

Show me where in the Constitution it says the people have to extend their rights to non-citizens

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (t0Rmr)

171 If belonging to a rival banger group is a basis for a legitimate asylum claim then we are fucked.
Posted by: Should be frivolous on its face
===
*looks down ar name tag my name is: sees"fucked"*

Funny I just noticed we all have filled out our name tags identically....

Posted by: Moron at a meeting up at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (2qXmI)

172 Pretty sure I've eaten 1200 calories worth of peanut M&Ms in the last ten minutes.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (2UnvF)

173 170 Show me where in the Constitution it says the people have to extend their rights to non-citizens
Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (t0Rmr)

======

Show me in the Constitution where it says that citizens only get the rights.

Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (GBKbO)

174 151 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

WTF?? That's hilarious. LOL!!
Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (5xuJ/)

Venus de Milo, weeps.

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (QAkQ3)

175 "Follow the money," Mark Felt.

Posted by: Deplorable Minion at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (QSrLX)

176
"Amateurs! I eat 17,000 calories a day, and everyone still calls me beautiful!"

-- Lizzo
Posted by: Elric Blade

Have you seen her recently? She is still heavy but has lost a lot of weight and is advocating exercise as a way to improve heath. As a result, the body positivity crowd is losing their shizzle.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (p4NUW)

177 BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.

I'm guessing a lot of these guys could do a good job working for Jim Cramer

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (t0Rmr)

178 The chick has no hands. Is this meaningful?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:31 PM (jc0TO

How is she supposed to make a sammich???

Posted by: Emmie celebrates the Audacity of Trump! at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (cSvoa)

179 Ten bucks says they'll find a live homeless man masturbating in juxtaposition to that statue.
Posted by: gotta work with what you got at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (TbWk/)

I'm not even joking, there will be a disgusting sticky lake of spooge all around that thing by the middle of next week.

And saying that there is will be racist for some reason.

San Franciscans will yearn for the days their streets just had poop and broken needles on them.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (VoAdT)

180 Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day
-

What even is this? Please don’t. Not even as a joke. This is like 2 calories above starvation.
Posted by: Piper

_

Take it up with Harvard if you disagree:

https://tinyurl.com/2wehzxt6

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (ldflT)

181 You don’t need a 4473 if it’s a private sale.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director

Read the last sentence again. If they buy a firearm without filling out the form aka private sale in some states, they are still committing a crime because they are a forbidden person under the GCA (and possibly NFA depending on the item). If a felon goes and answers on a 4473 honestly that they are a felon and the firearm dealer sells them the firearm, then it is the firearm dealer committing the crime.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:42 PM (ctrM5)

And they do, in fact, need a 4473 for a private sale, if you are in a retarded state that requires "universal background checks" for all poorly defined "transfers."

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (i24o9)

182 I'll be in my bunk

@LeadingReport
·
7m
BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM

No need for it. Net neutrality killed us all years ago.

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (kgE5c)

183 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

Posted by: javems at April 11, 2025 01:16 PM (8I4hW)

WTF?? That's hilarious. LOL!!

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (5xuJ/)

Guys spend 9 months getting out . . . .

Help me find my keys and we can drive out...

Posted by: Archimedes - just the punchline at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (xCA6C)

184 Climate studies has been a scam for a long time - you want money for a study, attach the word "climate" to it and get some bucks.

Posted by: El Mariachi at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (gDhA9)

185 Try, as an American, going to any country on the planet, commits heinous crimes, then when see how long your ass stays in the country before getting deported.

But we have to keep everyone here because reasons.

As has been said many times before the constitution is not a suicide pact.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (xHYkz)

186 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

https://tinyurl.com/2wthrjbt

So why did that construction worker have his head up her butt?

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (t0Rmr)

187 Show me where in the Constitution it says the people have to extend their rights to non-citizens
Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (t0Rmr)

Non-citizens who deliberately violated US immigration laws, in particular.

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (rj6Yv)

188 What even is this? Please don’t. Not even as a joke. This is like 2 calories above starvation.
Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:34 PM (p4NUW)

1200 calories is actual starvation, I think. Hell, I need something like 3200 calories a day to maintain my weight. I know wimmenz have slower metabolisms, but jeez.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 01:39 PM (l3YAf)
_______

"Amateurs! I eat 17,000 calories a day, and everyone still calls me beautiful!"

-- Lizzo
Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (iFTx/)

Lol, depends on height, weight and activity. 1200 calories sounds about right for the BMR + slight activity for a small woman.

the 2,000 calories a day thing is a fairly arbitrary number -- it's just an average.

A 6'4 burly guy who works with his hands will need a lot more than 2,000 calories to maintain his weight.

A 5'1 woman who works in an office and has minimal physical activity needs a lot less than 2,000 calories to maintain her weight.

Lizzo does need to eat a lot of calories to maintain her (former) weight. Although she's been losing weight lately, so good for her.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (uCjyK)

189 "So why did that construction worker have his head up her butt?
Posted by: 18-1"

Because it's there!

Posted by: fd at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (vFG9F)

190 Roman Maroni deported to Sweden, says he's not from there.

Posted by: 88 caliber, shoots right through a school at April 11, 2025 01:47 PM (TbWk/)

191 Show me in the Constitution where it says that citizens only get the rights.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (GBKbO)

It's pretty clear from the ACTS of those who gave us the Constitution, that they believed in different levels of 'Rights'... from Citizen, to Slave, to Indian not in numerated, they all had a different levels of Legal Rights.

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:47 PM (QAkQ3)

192 A new Morning Consult poll has Trump looking strong in swing states:

North Carolina+9, Georgia+8, Nevada+8, Arizona+6, Pennsylvania+3, Michigan+1, and New Mexico+3.

https://tinyurl.com/mrztyb4j

Posted by: Meade Lux Lewis, Domestic Terrorist at April 11, 2025 01:47 PM (paSBy)

193 Lol, depends on height, weight and activity. 1200 calories sounds about right for the BMR + slight activity for a small woman.

I remember reading that it is common for women to gain weight after moving in with a man - because they tend to match meal size.

And since men are on the average bigger and more physically active that means more calories...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (t0Rmr)

194 R-Evolution. Ohh, so edgy. Sounds like a tennis shoe.

Posted by: fd at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (vFG9F)

195 So why did that construction worker have his head up her butt?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (t0Rmr)

Because she has a GREAT ASS!!!!

Posted by: Al Pacino in that one movie at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (TbWk/)

196 Try, as an American, going to any country on the planet, commits heinous crimes, then when see how long your ass stays in the country before getting deported.
--
If you try hard enough, you can stay a really long time, and get your room and board covered.

Posted by: Johnny Somali at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (Dnobf)

197 BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (mlg/3)

Always remember the initial objection of the NeverTrump movement was that he wasn't conservative enough.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (lTWm8)

198 1200 calories is actual starvation, I think. Hell, I need something like 3200 calories a day to maintain my weight. I know wimmenz have slower metabolisms, but jeez.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director

--

Are you an active male?

Because encouraging sedentary women to eat like active males is a big (ha) part of the problem.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (ldflT)

199 Grabbing a great butt > Watching a great butt >>>>>> Sticking your head up a great butt

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (t0Rmr)

200 Lizzo does need to eat a lot of calories to maintain her (former) weight. Although she's been losing weight lately, so good for her.

Yeah. The "fat pride" people have disowned her, LOL.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (2ocoG)

201 I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either.
=====

Kinda like Joe Biden.

Posted by: San Franpsycho at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (RIvkX)

202 Trump absolutely has the Constitutional power to deport illegal aliens. Now, the issue is, what if the Gov't makes a mistake and deports a US citizen, e.g. like Cheech & Chong's movie "Born in East LA"?
So I understand some modicum of procedure and process is needed to avoid this. Of course, any crack will be used by the left to monkey-wrench the system.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (ynpvh)

203 Isn't the big snag that the guy that got deported was an El Salvadoran citizen here illegally, and now he's lawfully in the hands of the El Salvador government, and it's up to them what they do with him.

Or can federal district judges bigfoot not only the US Government, but pretty much anyplace in the world they feel like getting bossy?

Posted by: William F. 'Buck' Dharma at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (Ft5W9)

204
Take it up with Harvard if you disagree:

https://tinyurl.com/2wehzxt6
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories

I especially disagree with Harvard just because it’s them. You do know who and what I am, right? And I don’t mean that in the snotty I am self important way, I mean as in I am not pulling things out of my ear kind of way.

Also, it’s 12:50 and I have burned twice as many calories as you told me to eat.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (p4NUW)

205 I remember reading that it is common for women to gain weight after moving in with a man - because they tend to match meal size.

And since men are on the average bigger and more physically active that means more calories...
Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (t0Rmr)

They also tend to drink more! For ... reasons.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (uCjyK)

206 Help me find my keys and we can drive out of here.

Posted by: Just the Punchline at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (jc0TO)

207 Always remember the initial objection of the NeverTrump movement was that he wasn't conservative enough.

I can't wait to hear Jonah Goldberg and co tell me that funding Global Warmination studies is the real conservative viewpoint.

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (t0Rmr)

208 Similar to how people don't know what women are when asked, people also have decided men and women are the same when it comes to meals.

Mothers have failed their daughters.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (ldflT)

209 Grabbing a great butt > Watching a great butt >>>>>> Sticking your head up a great butt

Head up an ass is on-brand for California.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (2ocoG)

210 R-Evolution. Ohh, so edgy. Sounds like a tennis shoe.
Posted by: fd at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (vFG9F)

Sounds like an NES game.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (lTWm8)

211 201 I don't know what this means. I don't think the Supreme Court knows either.
=====

Kinda like Joe Biden.

Posted by: San Franpsycho at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (RIvkX)

Ice cream and little girls make Joey happy; is it the same for SCOTUS?

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (ynpvh)

212 BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 01:43 PM (mlg/3)

It's another Trumpmas miracle!

Recall just a few years back that people were calling for the imprisonment of Climate Change deniers.

Posted by: Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (i24o9)

213 Climate change research: the planet has been cooling and warming for the past few billion years. It will continue this process for a few billion more years.

Le Fin.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (xHYkz)

214 the 2,000 calories a day thing is a fairly arbitrary number -- it's just an average.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (uCjyK)

I'll say. When I weighed 105# I was consuming over 3,000 calories per day.

Posted by: Emmie celebrates the Audacity of Trump! at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (cSvoa)

215 Climate studies has been a scam for a long time - you want money for a study, attach the word "climate" to it and get some bucks.
Posted by: El Mariachi at April 11, 2025 01:45 PM (gDhA9)

All that's missing is a "How dare you!" from the princess of 'climate' outrage.

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (rj6Yv)

216 So why did that construction worker have his head up her butt?
===
Same reason a dog licks his balls...

Posted by: Punchline at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (2qXmI)

217 So, who's in charge of America? Pick one:

1 elected officials
2 unelected officials
3 the courts
4 wealthy political donors
5 wealthy political donors from other countries
6 other countries

Posted by: Don Black at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (AOsQT)

218 210 R-Evolution. Ohh, so edgy. Sounds like a tennis shoe.
Posted by: fd at April 11, 2025 01:48 PM (vFG9F)

Sounds like an NES game.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (lTWm

Does R-Evolution stand for Reverse Evolution, e.g. going backwards?

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (ynpvh)

219 I especially disagree with Harvard just because it’s them. You do know who and what I am, right? And I don’t mean that in the snotty I am self important way, I mean as in I am not pulling things out of my ear kind of way.

Also, it’s 12:50 and I have burned twice as many calories as you told me to eat.
Posted by: Piper

-

Why would we discuss things that happen around the margins instead of the general population?

5' 3" women that don't do anything beyond walk to the car and back and then to the bathroom a few times once they get home is the real topic, not the 0.5% exercise instructors.

If you need more, eat more. Most women don't. You know this.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (ldflT)

220 217 So, who's in charge of America? Pick one:

1 elected officials
2 unelected officials
3 the courts
4 wealthy political donors
5 wealthy political donors from other countries
6 other countries

Posted by: Don Black at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (AOsQT)

Answer: Yes

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (ynpvh)

221 They also tend to drink more! For ... reasons.
Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (uCjyK)

I find that being aggravated makes me tired... could that be because it burns more calories?

Posted by: Romeo13 at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (QAkQ3)

222 Isn't the big snag that the guy that got deported was an El Salvadoran citizen here illegally, and now he's lawfully in the hands of the El Salvador government, and it's up to them what they do with him.

Correct. Guy is an El Salvador citizen and he's in an El Salvador prison. President Bukele will probably have new memes to mock Roberts shortly.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (2ocoG)

223 Pretty satisfied with the administration's operation to change the pool temperature for illegals. They're slowly systematically ratcheting up the disincentives to no self-deport. Using the (outrageous) CBP "app" to inform those that used it to enter they need to leave. Dangling (not sure how firm or how well-based on actual law and authority) the idea that not self-deporting may lead to long-term bans on visas or return. Citing existing law to suggest $1K/day fines may be applied to those not self-deporting.

Now this.

Trump signaled a (very very long over-due) offensive against "sanctuary" lawlessness yesterday. Not clear what the levers will be. Tragically much of this lies in a gray area of federal/state power - so guess which way things fall (so far). As a move that has no political downside and potentially some upside, I've long favored the obvious approach: appropriations legislation stating "no funds appropriated by this or any other act shall be disbursed until the jurisdiction receiving funds has been certified by the DOJ and DHS to be fully cooperating in immigration enforcement".

Make Congress vote on it. Walk the plank, beyotches.

Posted by: rhomboid at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (1m82a)

224 So why did that construction worker have his head up her butt?
Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 01:46 PM (t0Rmr)

Because (pick one)
1. It was there.
2. Because he could.

Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (5xuJ/)

225 148 That reminds me ... When are we going to see Harriet Tubman's image on the double sawbuck?
Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (rj6Yv)

The day after we get Mayor Pete's Alfred E Newman lookin' mug on the three dollar bill. - Warai-otoko

Well, what the hell are they waiting for? Get 'er done, people!

Posted by: Paco at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (mADJX)

226 148 That reminds me ... When are we going to see Harriet Tubman's image on the double sawbuck?
Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:40 PM (rj6Yv)

The day after we get Mayor Pete's Alfred E Newman lookin' mug on the three dollar bill.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at April 11, 2025 01:41 PM (VoAdT)
------

I love AI:

https://tinyurl.com/54n6namr

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:52 PM (6ydKt)

227 Or can federal district judges bigfoot not only the US Government, but pretty much anyplace in the world they feel like getting bossy?

Not only am I co-president of the US I’m also co-president of the world!
- Judge Jason B. Fuckstick, Jr. 91st district, Maine

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:52 PM (xHYkz)

228 Show me in the Constitution where it says that citizens only get the rights.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, looking for laughs with Ivan Reitman at April 11, 2025 01:44 PM (GBKbO)

It's in the Declaration of Independence, which is more important than the Constitution. Governments are formed among men to protect those Rights, so if you aren't among the men who formed the government (created, not comprised, so they're talking about The People, not federal employees), that government has no business worrying about your rights.

Whatever government you form is responsible for that.

Posted by: Methos at April 11, 2025 01:52 PM (Dnobf)

229 The man in question IS an illegal immigrant from El Salvador.
Back in 2019, an immigration judge looked at all the evidence, looked at the data and concluded he was a member of an MS-13 gang. He had also committed some traffic violations. He had not shown up for some court dates.

So, he is eligible for deportation regardless of his gang status.

Posted by: El Mariachi at April 11, 2025 01:52 PM (gDhA9)

230 once again roberts is trying to have his cake and eat it too.

and the entire court is going to get destroyed because he refuses to reign in these out of control district court judges who think they're above the president.

pretty soon, it's going to be the supremes only able to say yes or know, but even congress with ignore them....

Posted by: Sturmtoddler at April 11, 2025 01:53 PM (nXhwP)

231 213 Climate change research: the planet has been cooling and warming for the past few billion years. It will continue this process for a few billion more years.

Le Fin.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:50 PM (xHYkz)

Until the sun starts growing, supposedly in another 500 million years, and then things will definitely heat up on this globe. Fortunately I won't be around for that.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:53 PM (ynpvh)

232 Off topic. Sorry. Here is the San Francisco giant, naked woman statue. . SFW kinda.

The statue is intended to support the idea where women can walk freely without fear? LOL I think it's a really bad idea for women to walk in the nude in any big city, and even clothed women would be safer in a big city if Democratic politicians didn't support the idea of no bail/no jail allowing lunatics and career criminals to prey on women and men too.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 11, 2025 01:53 PM (ge+8f)

233 Statue chick has man-feet and weird elbows. Would not bang.

Posted by: The 50 Foot Man at April 11, 2025 01:54 PM (vFG9F)

234 Pretty satisfied with the administration's operation to change the pool temperature for illegals.

Yeah. Reportedly a lot are self-deporting and that rate is accelerating.

Posted by: Ian S. at April 11, 2025 01:54 PM (2ocoG)

235 Always remember the initial objection of the NeverTrump movement was that he wasn't conservative enough.
Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025
________

I have no idea what he actually believes, even now. But he's pissed off and on my side, and that's more than enough.

Posted by: Biff Pocoroba at April 11, 2025 01:54 PM (Dm8we)

236 Climate studies has been a scam for a long time

-
Scam or profit center?

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:55 PM (L/fGl)

237 One man’s scam
Is another man’s profit center.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 01:55 PM (xHYkz)

238 Grok gives this as a quasi guideline for women, but it depends on other factors as well:

Sedentary (little to no exercise):
Ages 19–25: 1,800–2,000 calories
Ages 26–45: 1,800 calories
Ages 46–65: 1,600 calories
Ages 66+: 1,600 calories

Moderately Active (light exercise/sports 3–5 days/week):
Ages 19–25: 2,200 calories
Ages 26–45: 2,000 calories
Ages 46–65: 1,800 calories
Ages 66+: 1,800 calories

Active (daily exercise/sports or physically demanding job):
Ages 19–25: 2,400 calories
Ages 26–45: 2,200 calories
Ages 46–65: 2,000 calories
Ages 66+: 2,000 calories

Posted by: Lady in Black at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (qBdHI)

239 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare." Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

Those are white women, who are basically one step above refuse.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (lTWm8)

240 If they self deport, they can take their $70K pickup trucks that they financed through GMAC.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (jc0TO)

241 Dangling (not sure how firm or how well-based on actual law and authority) the idea that not self-deporting may lead to long-term bans on visas or return. Citing existing law to suggest $1K/day fines may be applied to those not self-deporting.

Posted by: rhomboid
=======
That dangling is indeed the immigration law. If someone has a deportation order, then defying it becomes a) a criminal charge and b) either the long term ban on even a visitor visa or permanent barring.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (ctrM5)

242 As El Mariachi just said, the guy is "removable" and was made so under normal immigration process. I believe the only asterisk was that he was not removable to his home country, due to (deemed) well-founded fear of retribution/something from a gang there. So he was allowed to stay. However, that fear issue was mooted by .... Bukele cleaning up ES and destroying/imprisoning the gangs. Dunno, maybe another immigration review was needed, and should have concluded fear of gang issue moot, and out you go.

Posted by: rhomboid at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (1m82a)

243 have no idea what he actually believes, even now. But he's pissed off and on my side, and that's more than enough
==
Authentically pissed off and Authentically against those who are against me. Also funny. Perfect as it gets.

Posted by: Punchline at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (2qXmI)

244 So, who's in charge of America? Pick one:

1 elected officials
2 unelected officials
3 the courts
4 wealthy political donors
5 wealthy political donors from other countries
6 other countries

Posted by: Don Black

Disney.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (L/fGl)

245 Show me in the Constitution where it says that citizens only get the rights.

I think a case could be made that beginning the document with "We the People of the United States..." suggests it. And if it does, does every subsequent mention of "the People" also? I dunno. I don't feel very confident either way and I don't know that I'd trust SCOTUS to answer either.

Posted by: Oddbob at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (/y8xj)

246 The man in question IS an illegal immigrant from El Salvador.
Back in 2019, an immigration judge looked at all the evidence, looked at the data and concluded he was a member of an MS-13 gang. He had also committed some traffic violations. He had not shown up for some court dates.

So, he is eligible for deportation regardless of his gang status.
---
Immigration court judges are Executive Branch judges--not Article III judges.
It's literally one department of the Executive Branch telling another department of the Executive what to do.

And Article III judges are acting like that's a binding order!

So, Trump needs to just say, "the judge that issued that order works for the Executive. I, the Chief Executive, am revoking that order. He was here illegally. He will not be returned. The end."

Posted by: People's Hippo Voice at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (JpbSW)

247 236 Climate studies has been a scam for a long time

-
Scam or profit center?

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:55 PM (L/fGl)

Paki call centers telling you your PC his having issues and they need access to fix it...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (ynpvh)

248 Scam or profit center?
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:55 PM (L/fGl)

A serious question that Al Gore should answer.

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (rj6Yv)

249
BREAKING: Trump plans to end climate change research programs, per CNN.
Posted by: weft cut-loop

=============

He's already cut off funding for quite a few "studies."

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (+KY4Y)

250 Grok gives this as a quasi guideline for women, but it depends on other factors as well:

-

Ask it what makes black people awesome. It will tell you specifics.

Ask it what makes white people awesome. It will scold you.

Don't trust Grok to provide you with information.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (ldflT)

251 239 Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare." Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

Those are white women, who are basically one step above refuse.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (lTWm

Dem bronze statues ain't white.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (ynpvh)

252 244 So, who's in charge of America? Pick one:

1 elected officials
2 unelected officials
3 the courts
4 wealthy political donors
5 wealthy political donors from other countries
6 other countries

Posted by: Don Black

Disney.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (L/fGl)

I still LOL when I think of someones comment that Disney is now a non-profit.

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 01:58 PM (ynpvh)

253 Disney.

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Soldier of the Persistence at April 11, 2025 01:56 PM (L/fGl)

-- --

It sure does seem like it sometimes.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 01:59 PM (6ydKt)

254 >>> impact up to 3.2 million people living in the U.S. illegally

Shouldn't that be 32 million, not 3.2?

Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at April 11, 2025 01:59 PM (j8+bv)

255 have no idea what he actually believes, even now. But he's pissed off and on my side, and that's more than enough.
Posted by: Biff Pocoroba at April 11, 2025 01:54 PM (Dm8we)

He believes in a strong wealthy America and that western civilization is an unalloyed good. Unlike our two parties.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 01:59 PM (lTWm8)

256 And they do, in fact, need a 4473 for a private sale, if you are in a retarded state that requires "universal background checks" for all poorly defined "transfers."
Posted by: Comrade Flounder
=======
Correct. Too lazy to look up the non free states.

But the principle is yes, you can be required to fill out forms, address, etc. if you are here. Even tourist or student visas to the US require similar information if not fingerprints.

Posted by: whig at April 11, 2025 01:59 PM (ctrM5)

257 Grok gives this as a quasi guideline for women, but it depends on other factors as well:
===
FYI. Grok likes big butt's, he can not lie. He gets sprung...boing

Posted by: Who among us has not admired a moon at April 11, 2025 01:59 PM (2qXmI)

258 Why would we discuss things that happen around the margins instead of the general population?

5' 3" women that don't do anything beyond walk to the car and back and then to the bathroom a few times once they get home is the real topic, not the 0.5% exercise instructors.

If you need more, eat more. Most women don't. You know this.
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (ldflT)

In the Harvard article you linked, 1200 is the bare minimum for a woman trying to lose a lot of weight. It’s not the amount a woman actually needs to live.

Do you really think men only require 1500 calories per-day?

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 02:00 PM (l3YAf)

259 >Has this retard never seen a public sculpture before? There are sculptures of women all over the fucking place.

Posted by: Elric Blade at April 11, 2025 01:27 PM (iFTx/)

Those are white women, who are basically one step above refuse.

Posted by: ...

----

Marble is white

Posted by: Don Black at April 11, 2025 02:00 PM (AOsQT)

260 He's already cut off funding for quite a few "studies."
Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (+KY4Y)

What? How will "Experts" make ends meet?

Posted by: mrp at April 11, 2025 02:00 PM (rj6Yv)

261 How can a country grant rights to the rest of the world? That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Do Martians get our rights, too?

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 02:01 PM (lTWm8)

262 is it okay if I call them Illicit Aliens instead of Illegal Aliens?

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:01 PM (ynpvh)

263 Sometimes marbles are blue or green.

Posted by: Boss Moss at April 11, 2025 02:01 PM (IBKq8)

264 Ask it what makes white people awesome. It will scold you.

Don't trust Grok to provide you with information.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (ldflT)

--- -

If it's doing that then Elon needs to get it fixed because he has sold Grok as the AI that will seek and tell the truth without fear or favor and laid out very good reasons for taking that stance.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 02:01 PM (6ydKt)

265
He's already cut off funding for quite a few "studies."
Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 01:57 PM (+KY4Y)

What? How will "Experts" make ends meet?
Posted by: mrp

================

Boston Globe reporters are tearfully asking that as we speak.

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (+KY4Y)

266 whig thanks, as always you've got the goods. In this case however I was referring to the administration's savvy dangling of the threat to those who have not undergone any "process", and thus have not been officially made removable. It's more of a general threat designed (like all the most steps) to ramp up pressure to self-deport.

Yes the options for prosecuting people "in the system" are well-founded in law. But most of the illegals in the country are not in the system. At a minimum, all those here since '86 who've never in any way engaged with the system. And AFAIK the status of the zillion fake asylum petitioners (the bulk of the flow under Biden).

As I understand it, this threat was presented as a policy matter - and the weak point there is ..... return to calamitous idiotic Dem misrule in the WH, where the policy would be nixed in 24 hours. I might have some details wrong but overall again I am impressed with the systematic moves to maximize self-deportation incentives. Even without a judiciary off the rails and sabotaging the USG's legitimate actions, the complications and resources to actively deporting over 10M are daunting.

Posted by: rhomboid at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (1m82a)

267 263 Sometimes marbles are blue or green.

Posted by: Boss Moss at April 11, 2025 02:01 PM (IBKq

Balls can be blue, too...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (ynpvh)

268 I'm not even going to look at the San Francisco statue but I'm guessing it's ripe for a countering statue to be placed in juxtaposition to it.
Posted by: TexasDan

How about five, bigger, statues of black dudes standing behind her?

Posted by: Taq, Rickrolled by Jesus at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (CljNn)

269 Copilot sez

The only Republican who voted "NO" on H.R. 1526, also known as the "No Rogue Rulings Act," was Representative Mike Turner from Ohio. All other Republicans supported the measure, while all Democrats opposed it. Let me know if you'd like more details about the bill or its implications!

Posted by: Don Black at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (AOsQT)

270 Do you really think men only require 1500 calories per-day?
===
How much time do these men spend sitting on a couch playing video games and what is their current muscle mass???

Posted by: Who among us has not admired a moon at April 11, 2025 02:03 PM (2qXmI)

271 Kinda like Joe Biden.
Posted by: San Franpsycho at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (RIvkX)

What Ace did there: you saw it.
If SCOTUS is going to play the Oracle Of Delphi then all Trump has to do is to nod sagely, shuffle some papers, and keep on keepin' on.

Posted by: gKWVE at April 11, 2025 02:03 PM (gKWVE)

272
Balls can be blue, too...
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:02 PM (ynpvh)

Blossom, TX. They painted the big water tower in the middle of town red, white and blue. The blue is the big storage tank on top. Yes, it's shaped like a ball.

I laugh every time I see it.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 02:04 PM (Zz0t1)

273 The only Republican who voted "NO" on H.R. 1526, also known as the "No Rogue Rulings Act," was Representative Mike Turner from Ohio.

Don Bacon must have been nursing a hangover.

Posted by: gKWVE at April 11, 2025 02:04 PM (gKWVE)

274
is it okay if I call them Illicit Aliens instead of Illegal Aliens?
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia)

=============

Heya, jim. How's it going?

And yes, it's okay. If anyone objects, just say you went to Kalifornia public schools and you didn't learn to spel.

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 02:04 PM (+KY4Y)

275 Marble is white

Sometimes.

Posted by: Connamara at April 11, 2025 02:04 PM (2qXmI)

276 And they're PROUD of their big blue ball......

https://is.gd/uKf2Rw

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 02:05 PM (Zz0t1)

277 Why would we discuss things that happen around the margins instead of the general population?

5' 3" women that don't do anything beyond walk to the car and back and then to the bathroom a few times once they get home is the real topic, not the 0.5% exercise instructors.

If you need more, eat more. Most women don't. You know this.
-

In the Harvard article you linked, 1200 is the bare minimum for a woman trying to lose a lot of weight. It’s not the amount a woman actually needs to live.

Do you really think men only require 1500 calories per-day?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director

-

Fatasses with sedentary-women level of activity?

Yeah, 1500 until they get to a good healthy 160 or so is probably about right.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:05 PM (ldflT)

278 It could be that just about any material that Grok would be trained with that would list great things about white people would be immediately labelled as "White Supremacist" and never fed to it.

In fact, Grok is likely to find 100x the material on what makes white people bad and 1000x the material on what makes other races good.

Just spitballin' here.

Posted by: SpeakingOf at April 11, 2025 02:05 PM (6ydKt)

279 How can a country grant rights to the rest of the world? That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Do Martians get our rights, too?

Coming to a court near you soon...

Bugs Bunny arrested for denying Marvin the Martian's RKBA in the US (and blow up the planet)

Posted by: 18-1 at April 11, 2025 02:05 PM (t0Rmr)

280 271 Kinda like Joe Biden.
Posted by: San Franpsycho at April 11, 2025 01:49 PM (RIvkX)

What Ace did there: you saw it.
If SCOTUS is going to play the Oracle Of Delphi then all Trump has to do is to nod sagely, shuffle some papers, and keep on keepin' on.

Posted by: gKWVE at April 11, 2025 02:03 PM (gKWVE)

I kinda remember reading somewhere that the gases that the earth emitted where the Oracle of Delphi was located would make people high...a High Court indeed!

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:06 PM (ynpvh)

281 Dow up 600
Was down 400
Was up 500

Wild day again.

Posted by: Its Go Time Donald at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (xHYkz)

282 9NEWS Denver
@9NEWS
·
4h
Democratic U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet has announced his run for governor.

other than he's not a peter-puffer, nothing will change

Posted by: Don Black at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (AOsQT)

283 Scam or profit center?
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks

Scam and neo-marxist campaign to destroy Western countries and murder the middle class.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (mlg/3)

284 274
is it okay if I call them Illicit Aliens instead of Illegal Aliens?
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia)

=============

Heya, jim. How's it going?

And yes, it's okay. If anyone objects, just say you went to Kalifornia public schools and you didn't learn to spel.

Posted by: Blonde Morticia at April 11, 2025 02:04 PM (+KY4Y)

Doing okay. Keeping my ~~shit~~ colostomy bag for three extra months; doc says improves the changes of a successful reconnection. Human plumbing is much harder to fix that house plumbing...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (ynpvh)

285 I think the judges just said, "We don't like it." Not sure that's a point of law.

I never considered that a point of design either, but then what do I know? I'm just a poor architect.

Posted by: tcn in AK at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (eQO/Z)

286 I was about to cite Joan of Arc as an example of women represented in art, but I see she has been transmuted to male now.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (XeU6L)

287 Fatasses with sedentary-women level of activity?

Yeah, 1500 until they get to a good healthy 160 or so is probably about right.
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:05 PM (ldflT)

That’s not what they require, though. 1500 calories is a bare minimum for losing weight, and it’s unsustainable in the long run.

160 pounds? Lol, you’re a manlet. Explains a lot.

Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (l3YAf)

288 Doing okay. Keeping my shit colostomy bag for three extra months; doc says improves the changes of a successful reconnection. Human plumbing is much harder to fix that house plumbing...
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (ynpvh)

Have you tried PEX?

Posted by: tcn in AK at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (eQO/Z)

289
Pushmi-pullyu?

Sounds like a brand of rickshaw.

https://youtube.com/shorts/ZvTZ6io1Qyo

Posted by: Obligatory Seinfeld reference at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (dg+HA)

290 288 Doing okay. Keeping my shit colostomy bag for three extra months; doc says improves the changes of a successful reconnection. Human plumbing is much harder to fix that house plumbing...
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (ynpvh)

Have you tried PEX?
Posted by: tcn in AK at April 11, 2025 02:09 PM (eQO/Z)

Yeah, just throw some shark bites on it, it should hold.

Posted by: Harry Paratestes at April 11, 2025 02:10 PM (uCjyK)

291 Some of these judges make a mockery out of their profession. And when they do that the average citizens lose any respect or faith they have in them or our system.

Posted by: Case at April 11, 2025 02:10 PM (OrSPY)

292 Doing okay. Keeping my shit colostomy bag for three extra months; doc says improves the changes of a successful reconnection. Human plumbing is much harder to fix that house plumbing...
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (ynpvh)

I'm leaning on the side of doing whatever it takes to make that a successful situation.

My dad wanted his reconnected, but because he had no colon whatsoever, they couldn't do it.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 02:10 PM (Zz0t1)

293 nood

Posted by: RUReadingthis at April 11, 2025 02:11 PM (aQ25I)

294 In the Harvard article you linked, 1200 is the bare minimum for a woman trying to lose a lot of weight. It’s not the amount a woman actually needs to live.

-

Also can you please cite the discussion on the bolded section?

Because if you're 5' 3", sedentary, and only need 1200 calories, then 1200 calories is all you need.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:11 PM (ldflT)

295
If you need more, eat more. Most women don't. You know this.
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 01:51 PM (ldflT)

I do know. I also know where those calories should come from to optimize health in a person with no underlying health conditions. The caloric requirement of a 4 year old is 1300.

I think even the fittest amongst us should avoid crowing about how amazing they are and how dumpy anyone not perfectly sculpted is- instead, try meeting people where they are. Supporting appropriate, sensible and sustainable changes in behavior toward food and exercise is far more effective. Embracing even the smallest effort toward health, where that conversation is appropriate and solicited, ends the can’t cycle and begins the can do.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 02:11 PM (p4NUW)

296 I love the arguments we have here. I really do. And I say "we" very lightly.

Posted by: ... at April 11, 2025 02:12 PM (lTWm8)

297 292 Doing okay. Keeping my shit colostomy bag for three extra months; doc says improves the changes of a successful reconnection. Human plumbing is much harder to fix that house plumbing...
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:08 PM (ynpvh)

I'm leaning on the side of doing whatever it takes to make that a successful situation.

My dad wanted his reconnected, but because he had no colon whatsoever, they couldn't do it.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 02:10 PM (Zz0t1)

so less than a semi-colon...

Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) at April 11, 2025 02:12 PM (ynpvh)

298 Fatasses with sedentary-women level of activity?

Yeah, 1500 until they get to a good healthy 160 or so is probably about right.
-

That’s not what they require, though. 1500 calories is a bare minimum for losing weight, and it’s unsustainable in the long run.

160 pounds? Lol, you’re a manlet. Explains a lot.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director

-

Ah, good. The ad hominems have appeared.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:12 PM (ldflT)

299 The caloric requirement of a 4 year old is 1300.

-

Those 4 year olds are very active, right?

Did you mean to make my point again?

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:13 PM (ldflT)

300 Everyday is another existential nail biter election for our nation with these judicial activists. There was nothing like this during the Biden Regime, despite all the daily insanity, criminal and unconstitutional acts.

Posted by: Field Marshal Zhukov at April 11, 2025 02:14 PM (wBaIH)

301 I love the arguments we have here. I really do. And I say "we" very lightly.
Posted by: ...

-

I'll note that I was just sitting there minding my own business.

Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories per day at April 11, 2025 02:15 PM (ldflT)

302 NOODlum.

Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Cancer at April 11, 2025 02:16 PM (Zz0t1)

303 Exactly. Without this statue, where would anyone ever see a strong modern independent woman.
--
with no hands, suggesting a lack of agency.
Posted by: Grump928(C)

No Mans Land.

Posted by: stu-mick-o-sucks at April 11, 2025 02:17 PM (MDua2)

304 "facilitate" is such a John Roberts weaseling.

Like, just what the f do you mean?

Say or say not, you have used a meaningless "action" word.

Posted by: People's Hippo Voice at April 11, 2025 02:17 PM (JpbSW)

305
Those 4 year olds are very active, right?

Did you mean to make my point again?
Posted by: Boron Cobbie - Women only need 1200 calories

Ha! Okay, friend. I don’t think even you believe this, because surely someone who is as well versed as you on nutrition and caloric requirements understands the height and weight part of the equation, amongst the rest of the considerations versus just throwing out a number.

Posted by: Piper at April 11, 2025 02:19 PM (p4NUW)

306 I still LOL when I think of someones comment that Disney is now a non-profit.
Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia)

Ouch. That'll leave a mark.

Posted by: rickb223 at April 11, 2025 02:20 PM (8JE3Q)

307
Then he says one of the stupidest things I've ever heard: "women's presence in public art is rare."

*cough*
Posted by: Mona Lisa and Statue of Liberty at April 11, 2025 01:37 PM (xCA6C)

Bitches.

Posted by: Michaelangelo's Pieta at April 11, 2025 02:21 PM (y9nCu)

308 Does an alien (illegal or otherwise) have a 2nd amendment right to a firearm?

“The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”

Are they people? Yup. You might not like the idea, but it’s amusing to watch our betters in robes try to get around this.

They have to keep a thin veneer of legitimacy whilst they shred all intent of the Constitution. Aliens, of course, can be ejected forthwith. The End. They’ll never admit this, thus the pretzel logic and muddying the waters to try and make it look deep.

Posted by: Common Tater at April 11, 2025 02:28 PM (kmhyd)

309 Anybody else remember the PSAs which used to run in December notifying ALL aliens (legal and illegal) that they must register at the nearest Post Office by the end of January?

Back in the 50s & 60s, IIRC.

Posted by: LCMS Rulz! at April 11, 2025 03:01 PM (bufu1)

310 Trump is ordered to try and get him back, 'facliitate'.
The district court has to clarify what is meant by 'effectuate' his return.

The Supreme Court said treat him as if you hadn't made the mistake of deporting him to El Salvador. The judge has mistaken this for 'return him to the US'.

Trump can send him to another country.

Posted by: MikeN at April 11, 2025 03:50 PM (HVZOH)

311 No Imperial Judges like Boasburg and Merchan

Posted by: Tamaa the Drongo Bird at April 11, 2025 04:49 PM (wGqjj)

Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0326 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0112 seconds, 320 records returned.
Page size 181 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.