aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down the Colorado Supreme Court's Juvenile Internet Trolling Disguised as a "Judicial Decision"
The three liberal Justices claimed that that goes to far, and that a state could rule that Trump (or any other office-seeker) was barred from seeking federal office if that person had been convicted under the federal law of "insurrection." That's not a crazy position to hold, but the justices in the majority probably resisted it, because they know the left is just spamming out one lawfare case after another, and if they left any wiggle room for another series of lawsuits to exclude Trump from the ballot, they'd leap to do that, and we'd have another nine months of actions to bar Trump from the ballot and a bunch more Supreme Court hearings on the constitutionality of these lawsuits. So the majority said, "No, that's enough of this bullshit. It ends now." See Ed Morrissey for some quotes from the majority and minority opinions. Here's Amy Coney Barrett, summing up:
Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home.Meanwhile, some reactions, and some failed predictions from the far left:
Ron Coleman"Per Curiam" means "by the court;" no single justice is writing it. A "per curiam" opinion represents the entire court. The ruling here is "per curiam," as it's unanimous.
@RonColeman PER CURIAM, bitches.
It's certainly gratifying that @dhillonlaw client Donald Trump won the Colorado case before the Supreme Court. (I was not part of the superb SCOTUS advocacy, but I was very involved in DJT's challenge to Colorado's actions which SCOTUS upheld.) HAVING SAID THIS, It is no less gratifying to witness the unanimous bench slap delivered to all the wise-ass academic, corporate media and Twitter constitutional law experts
J.D. VanceBecause our "expert class" has long been a pile of glittering mediocrities and on top of that, they all had untreated (and in fact reinforced and amplified) nervous breakdowns in 2016. They're fucking crazy in addition to being incompetent.
@JDVance1 Why did so many law professors fall for a garbage legal theory the Supreme Court just struck down unanimously?
Understand this:
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) March 4, 2024
The Colorado Supreme Court, the Maine Secretary of State, Illinois Judge Tracie Porter, Lawrence Tribe, Michael Luttig…
ALL just attempted to engage in insurrection. pic.twitter.com/GhSEXCmxJC
This is nothing short of a total judicial humiliation.
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) March 4, 2024
The Colorado Supreme Court is a disgrace.
Any lawyer who promoted this idiotic theory is a disgrace.
Maine’s secretary of state is a disgrace.
Total judicial destruction. pic.twitter.com/lK46hfHDR7
There’s a reason this idiot can’t get hired to practice law anymore. It takes a special amount of derangement and ineptitude to get spanked by a 9-0 Supreme Court. pic.twitter.com/Xbn7RFOCiS
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 4, 2024
Comments
(Jump to bottom of comments)Posted by: Duke Lowell at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (u73oe)
Posted by: Zeera , becoming ungovernable by choice at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (qGQta)
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (N1tpc)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (u73oe)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Skip at March 04, 2024 12:18 PM (552nR)
Don't forget the umbras and penumbras.
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:18 PM (MvF+J)
++++
Since when do they glitter?
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:18 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: sharon(willow's apprentice) at March 04, 2024 12:18 PM (t/2Uw)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (a1415)
Posted by: blaster at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (IFNME)
They wanted it so much, they were willing to overlook any flaws in their "reasoning."
Posted by: huerfano at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (Q4KYm)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (KRtlO)
++++
Well, it takes a special amount of politics and Party machination,
But I am sure the idiot will be well taken care of by the Party.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (HnUIn)
Does that mean that county traffic judge also is fked?
Posted by: Skip at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (552nR)
If you haven't yet figured out that 2024 is going to be terrible...
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (Yui9f)
The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the "court" has shown itself to be ...
Kinda racist and sexist, aren't you, Keefers?
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (xG4kz)
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (a1415)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (2ocoG)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (KRtlO)
++++
The writings of the Court should reflect the legal and Constitutional reality, not "the national temperature."
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (HnUIn)
Keefums will rape his way to create a lot of rubber ducky butt babies tonight, it seems.
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (xG4kz)
Posted by: gourmand du jour at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (MeG8a)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!)
they're the glitterati. The people who glitter.
Posted by: Cosmo Kramer at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (KRtlO)
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (5sOEG)
Posted by: CayleyGraph at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (IcF69)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Joe Mannix
---------
A take on Halberstam's Best and Brightest trope. In fact, they weren't smart and they weren't wise even in the 60's.
Leftism never works and impoverishes, corrupts, and destroys any society that it infects.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: LinusVanPelt at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (4Fb0A)
Posted by: Notorious BFD at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (V8he0)
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (7fElN)
Why did so many law professors fall for a garbage legal theory the Supreme Court just struck down unanimously?
I think Vance himself knows the answer to that question, but just in case:
Becoming a professor of any kind in 2024 has a lot more to do with being a Marxist than it does with any knowledge of the discipline one is nominally professing.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (xcrUy)
Posted by: gourmand du jour at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (MeG8a)
"Sounds like you could use one of my tumblers!"
- - -- - Binary Ben Shapiro
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (Zz0t1)
They wanted it so much, they were willing to overlook any flaws in their "reasoning."
Posted by: huerfano at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (Q4KYm)
Exactly. The left operates on justifying ANYTHING to get what they want.
They have zero permanent principles, they believe in power.
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (N1tpc)
SCROTUS will find that Podunct Dog Catcher can charge President $1.5B for parking the Beast in a handicapper spot while visiting town while in office.
Impeachment clause found unconstitutional.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (pUIaK)
Psychopaths. All of them.
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (AwYPR)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (u73oe)
Posted by: WisRich at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (G0vdT)
Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home."
WHOA WHOA WHOA FUCKING WHOA! That is not your fucking job AMY.
You do not get to decide rulings based on the 'temp' of the country, you are to rule on the LAW.
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (di6C2)
What would the law say ? If you're Donald Trump you can't run for office because ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (Akjoo)
Why did so many law professors fall for a garbage legal theory the Supreme Court just struck down unanimously? ...
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (W5ArC)
++++
They didn't, of course. They didn't "fall for" anything, and they don't subscribe to *any* kind of legal theory.
They're Party men. It's Party men all the way down. And good Party men support the Party's strategy.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (a1415)
Posted by: DanMan at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (8uzBS)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (Zz0t1)
Doesn't that knob have a degree in "communications" from a literal cow college?
Obviously the go-to guy for legal expertise.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (W5ArC)
100 lashes each outta do it.
Posted by: Hairyback Guy at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (/SHEi)
You're assuming that legal reasoning somehow entered in to their theory. It did not.
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (CsUN+)
Flames should be blue.
And should be dipping into tapioca pudding.
/ just saying
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (pUIaK)
You do not get to decide rulings based on the 'temp' of the country, you are to rule on the LAW.
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (di6C2)
Angling to be John Roberts Part 2.
Posted by: XTC at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (UnA8+)
Posted by: Our Country is Screwed at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (/mQWP)
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (JIdXK)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (a1415)
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (+DDBS)
I guess! But yeah they're saying it requires an act of congress. I assume it would be just that, a name or list of names who cannot hold office due to having committed insurrection.
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
Which is a very human thing to do. But it's actually worse. They started with the conclusion they wanted and "reasoned" backward. Which is also a very human thing to do but one which lawyers are (supposed to be) explicitly trained against.
Posted by: Oddbob at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (sNc8Y)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (HnUIn)
No this is a complete gfy, they will use other means such as charging him for bullshit crimes and random rape accusers
Posted by: Mr pink at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (l/VVk)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace
-------
Apparently not. You get the credit on Qwant though at number 8 link.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (pVWRI)
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (AwYPR)
Communist Twatter appears to be mostly stunned at the moment.
I expect some first-rate screeching to start up momentarily.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: Skip at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (552nR)
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (ufFY8)
I have no doubt that is part of the Leftist justice's strategy or at least their puppet masters . Only one of them is smart enough to come up with it on their own.
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (KRtlO)
Doesn't that knob have a degree in "communications" from a literal cow college?
Obviously the go-to guy for legal expertise.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (W5ArC)
Hey. Wasn't Jon Stewart an MTV Vee Jay back in the day? I mean, do you go to those who used to do something completely irrelevant for your political commentary and beliefs?
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (Zz0t1)
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (di6C2)
Yes absolutely. ACB is a flaming mediocrity
Posted by: LinusVanPelt at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (4Fb0A)
The trans community should riot
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (GBKbO)
Many unanimous decisions are written by an identified judge. When decisions are "per curiam" they generally fall into two categories: (1) the decision is very simple and obvious and (2) the decision is such that none of the judges want their fingerprints on it.
In this case, it's almost certainly the latter. It can't be #1 because of all the concurrences. That doesn't bode well for the immunity case. I think the Court is setting this up to fuck Trump on that case.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (iFTx/)
C'mon man, this is California! They're here!
Posted by: Commissar of Plenty and Lysenkoism in solidarity with the Struggle to maintain Moron standards at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (PkYxy)
But, I’m past caring what this court decides. I have respect for maybe 3 of them. The rest will hamstring any movement back to freedom and the rule of law as much as they can.
Posted by: Dr. Claw at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (jbnUc)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
Just being accused of it which Trump, so far isn't ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (63Dwl)
Posted by: Duke Lowell at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (u73oe)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (a1415)
Of the Castle Accccccc...?
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (di6C2)
Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home."
Shorter: Why women don't grok Dutiful Obligation.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (+DDBS)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (KRtlO)
++++
You saw it in my column. You're always ripping me off.
Posted by: Jonah Goldberg at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (HnUIn)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace
-------
Apparently not. You get the credit on Qwant though at number 8 link.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (bk5GW)
***
I promise to use it in a sentence at least five times today.
Posted by: Diogenes at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (W/lyH)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (KRtlO)
Posted by: BourbonChicken at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (cf/0E)
After all, just because the government waited until election season to bring all these bogus charges against Trump is no reason why these cases can't be resolved, and Trump convicted and imprisoned, before the election.
"The public" demands it.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (YAtuc)
Posted by: AZ deplorable moron at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (3LUnX)
Posted by: SMOD at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (RHGPo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (pVWRI)
It doesn't. And that, in its entirety, is glorious.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (Zz0t1)
I expect some first-rate screeching to start up momentarily.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (W5ArC)
========
I'm mostly anticipating the Intrepid DU Liaison.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (GBKbO)
"The ruling here is 'per curiam,' as it's unanimous."
Many unanimous decisions are written by an identified judge. When decisions are "per curiam" they generally fall into one of two categories: (1) the decision is very simple and obvious or (2) the decision is such that none of the judges want their fingerprints on it.
In this case, it's almost certainly the latter. It can't be #1 because of all the concurrences. That doesn't bode well for the immunity case. I think the Court is setting this up to fuck Trump on that case.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (iFTx/)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (GBKbO)
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (di6C2)
totally agree, she should have STFU
Posted by: Hatari somewhere on Ventura Highway at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (NtVYv)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden
This is about me isnt it?
-Kennedy
Posted by: BruceWayne at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (CIS44)
So if a Dem Congress wants to remove their biggest opponent for the presidency, all they need to do is vote that he's an insurrectionist? I can see no way this could go wrong.
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (CsUN+)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
Isn't there some precedent for that with the treatment of former Confederate officers after the Civil War?
If I'm remembering right, most of them were eventually pardoned and had their rights restored, but I could well be wrong. The details are hazy at the moment.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (W5ArC)
I guess! But yeah they're saying it requires an act of congress. I assume it would be just that, a name or list of names who cannot hold office due to having committed insurrection.
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
Wouldn't that be a Bill of Attainder? I realize they could simply say 'individual who does x, y and z' but it still seems squirrelly to me.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: steevy at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (FQmDC)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM
I'm pretty sure that former Harvard President Gay coined the phrase.
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (RKVpM)
Yeah, which is why it says -- in actual black letters -- that Congress has the power to enforce it.
Posted by: Oddbob at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (sNc8Y)
I guess! But yeah they're saying it requires an act of congress. I assume it would be just that, a name or list of names who cannot hold office due to having committed insurrection.
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
========
I assumed it meant a law that outlined what insurrection was.
Of course, Congress passing it now and trying to apply it to Trump would be ex post facto.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:24 PM (KRtlO)
Oathbreaking insurrection! I don't know why it needs the adjective, but who am I to argue with Jumanji et al.
Posted by: spindrift at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (La/vm)
Bongino worried that SCOTUS 9-0 ruling is a trap -- setting up a loss for Trump (and the nation and all other POTUSes) in the Presidential Immunity case.
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 12:15 PM (RanBs)
I tend to agree. In the famous words of Winston Wolf....
Posted by: Ordinary American at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (eWDZa)
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (CsUN+)
Ask me how that works out.
Posted by: Julius Caesar, Fishing on the banks of the Rubicon and cracking a few cold ones at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: huerfano at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM (Q4KYm)
It is the unending lure of the "will to calvinball"
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (D7oie)
Posted by: Jen the original at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (1q8Fq)
Posted by: Skip at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (552nR)
The bar is set so high to enforce laws and rules hat essentially it will never be enforced. Trump gets off free on trying to overthrow the United States. Amazing!
What would happen if Colorado pulled a Texas? Just did not put Trump on the ballot or count his votes? Essentially the 'you're not the boss of me' states-rights approach?
Trump won the 2016 election on a technicality. The majority of Americans did not vote for him; only the technical aspect that is the Electoral College saved him. (even that technical win was in good part due to Russian interference and manipulation of public opinion.) So he won on a technicality in court today. That's just how he rolls. When it comes to a clean fight, he still can't win.
This is really why democracy dies. There has to be a majority of the people behind the President. It messes up our whole theory of self government if we don’t go with the majority.
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Salieri's little monologue at the end of Amadeus, he fancies himself the patron saint of mediocrities.
Posted by: BourbonChicken at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (cf/0E)
Expect another pee memo or something just as ridiculous soon.
Maybe Trump peed on Putin after giving him the Nuclear codes.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (AJDwy)
Harmeet K. Dhillon
@pnjaban
Our firm
@dhillonlaw
serves as the chief litigation firm for the Trump campaign on the 14th Amendment issues (& others). So proud of David Warrington, who congratulated President Trump this morning shortly after we got the opinion. This is our firm’s statement. Onward!
(Not linked but please consider reading the statement attached.)
Posted by: L - We're done for now. We just don't have the guts to turn off the lights on the show at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (GshMh)
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 12:15 PM (RanBs)
I think that's a long shot anyway
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (Akjoo)
Of course, Congress passing it now and trying to apply it to Trump would be ex post facto.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, r
ya and, whats your point?
-State of New York
Posted by: BruceWayne at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (CIS44)
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (di6C2)
++++
It would be a bill of attainder, which is why they'd do it exactly the way you indicate. For anyone else to whom the law could technically apply, the message will be, "don't worry, it won't be used against *you* because we all know what this is really about. Trust us."
Just like in New York.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM
Warm down there in SC?
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (5sOEG)
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (5fDan)
This is about me isnt it?
-Kennedy
Posted by: BruceWayne at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (CIS44)
Your point is valid. However, her degree in philosophy from UCLA trumps Uberdouche's cow college degree.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (MvF+J)
Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home."
WHOA WHOA WHOA FUCKING WHOA! That is not your fucking job AMY.
You do not get to decide rulings based on the 'temp' of the country, you are to rule on the LAW.
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD
-
That was my thought, too.
I almost feel like this is them trying to make themselves feel better about themselves over the actions they took regarding 2020 when they didn't want to have to make the big decisions.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (Yui9f)
Okay... I just spit my coffee out on that one... Boy Scout ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:25 PM (iFTx/)
I doubt that.
They already brought up the issue of tit-for-tat on kicking Biden off the ballot.
If they rule on immunity as you suggest, EVERY republican AG ought to have charges ready for Biden and his junta.
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (N1tpc)
those fuckers are batshit crazy
Posted by: Hatari somewhere on Ventura Highway at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (NtVYv)
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (Iusta)
This is really why democracy dies. There has to be a majority of the people behind the President. It messes up our whole theory of self government if we don’t go with the majority.
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
=======
Since these people are very on board with "rule of the majority", they're very tied to it as principle and not just a path to power, right?
They'd support aggressive cleaning of election rolls, the tossing out of illegal ballots, and the arresting of those who would break the law to vote "for other people", right?
Right?!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
++++
Ah, so the centuries-old Constitutional mechanism through which the President is elected is a "technicality."
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: Joe Mannix
======
Doubt it. More likely Scotus gives the President at least qualified immunity that it gives to any other government employ and might prevent states from criminalizing official actions.
My guess is something like executive privilege case decision in US v Nixon. That case ratified executive privilege but allowed it to be overcome via individual criminal actions. Then they will send it back to district court.
There is also a pending legal challenge to the legality of Smith's appointment as it did not conform with the special prosecutor statute.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: steevy at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (FQmDC)
But when you start the day with a bang, that refractory period lasts a hell of a lot longer than it used to...
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (di6C2)
.. the immunity case has to be heard, the SCOTUS had no choice. The Appeals Court refused to take on many of the issues of the case. They just said 'no'.
Clearly, if there is immunity for judges and prosecutors, then the POTUS has some level of immunity. It probably cuts along the lines of official action vs personal actions. The Appeals Courts didn't eve make that distinction.
Posted by: SMOD at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (RHGPo)
Posted by: Some judge somewhere at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (Ow+08)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: Mr pink at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (wZoWU)
That doesn't bode well for the immunity case. I think the Court is setting this up to fuck Trump on that case.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM
Nah. That's a slam dunk too. The ramifications of not having a President with immunity is nearly frightening in how it would neuter the Chief executive forever.
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (RKVpM)
If it wasn't apparent, the Jan 6 shit, which is what year again, was all an op used to attack Trump.
All of that CNN airtime, with their special reports and all that, and how it gets mentioned online and all that...
Pretty amazing.
Posted by: Dr.Rev. Senator Your Highness E Buzz Miller, Esq PhD MA MS at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (et1vG)
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:28 PM (5fDan)
=======
Really, it's plan A.
Ballot box stuff like Tammany Hall in controlled precincts in purple states.
You know, just like last time.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (GBKbO)
If they rule on immunity as you suggest, EVERY republican AG ought to have charges ready for Biden and his junta.
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (N1tpc
Zee can O Worms, as you say, would be opened.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (AJDwy)
You do not get to decide rulings based on the 'temp' of the country, you are to rule on the LAW.
disappointing, isn't she?
the rare female it is who does not "think" like this
social conformity über alles for we XX types
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (AcWfM)
-Kennedy
Another sad decline in babeosity there. Started out with Nina Blackwood and Martha Quinn (yum!), wound up with Kennedy.
Posted by: Julius Caesar, Fishing on the banks of the Rubicon and cracking a few cold ones at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: Not trying to be mean but... at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (xQGdr)
**
The less she sums up about anything, the better.
Posted by: Ordinary American at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (eWDZa)
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (JIdXK)
It was the unending "derp, derp, derp" that was getting me down
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (D7oie)
In a city of 700,000, Donald Trump got 676 votes in the GOP primary. A tough jury pool....
You know, back before the court system was completely corrupted, defendants had the right to have their trials moved if it was impossible to get a fair trial in a particular jurisdiction.
That's been a part of the common law for centuries, until the DC Circuit abolished that protection.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (YAtuc)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (HnUIn)
========
"At no point in time has it ever been that the popular vote elects the president. Therefore, when it doesn't happen, it's a technicality."
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
Ah, the Democrats don't change.
DECRYING people who claim an election was stolen... while claiming an election was stolen.
They are consistent in their hypocrisy.
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (N1tpc)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM
I'm pretty sure that former Harvard President Gay coined the phrase.
--
It's weird to think about how a person used to be able to search for stuff like that. Just put it in quotations and it would come up if it existed.
But that doesn't work any longer.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (Yui9f)
they're adding debt in incredible amounts and it's spiraled out of control
let PDJT "deal" with it and then sweep back in in 2028 claiming to "fix" things
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (AcWfM)
Posted by: AZ deplorable moron at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (3LUnX)
His hair is something else.
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (ufFY8)
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (Yui9f)
This really fucking pisses me the fuck off. That means they would rule for obviously fucking injustices if it would 'cool things down' in their fucking opinion. What about what's right, Amy? How the fuck about that?!*
*pardon my language, ladies.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (di6C2)
Ah, so the centuries-old Constitutional mechanism through which the President is elected is a "technicality."
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (HnUIn)
"From the mouths of tards."
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (Zz0t1)
Someone has been doubling up on the Kool-Aid Dosage.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (+DDBS)
Good.....but DO NOT be FOOLED: Roberts does this (minor decisions) to throw conservatives a bone.
Then for BIG decisions (ie Obamacre) he RULES for the Liberals. EVERY TIME!!!!. And no-balls Kavanaugh and Amy "one trick PONY (abortion) Barrett will join him and the 3 commie justices against trump on immunity. I guarantee it (sadly)
Posted by: jb at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (Nu9cJ)
they're adding debt in incredible amounts and it's spiraled out of control
let PDJT "deal" with it and then sweep back in in 2028 claiming to "fix" things
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:31 PM (AcWfM)
========
They're not going to "let him win." That's not what people clinging to power in decaying power structures do.
They cling harder.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (bs59e)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (xcrUy)
That's not at all how I read it. If ACB has something to say, she knows how to use the English language. She should have done that here.
"Yo, stop being d***heads."
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (CsUN+)
Posted by: Tru Mon Rep at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (ZV+pB)
Posted by: Joe Mannix
======
Doubt it. More likely Scotus gives the President at least qualified immunity that it gives to any other government employ and might prevent states from criminalizing official actions.
My guess is something like executive privilege case decision in US v Nixon. That case ratified executive privilege but allowed it to be overcome via individual criminal actions. Then they will send it back to district court.
There is also a pending legal challenge to the legality of Smith's appointment as it did not conform with the special prosecutor statute.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (bk5GW)
lol good try, I dumb myself down to comment here tho. No offense but citing prior cases makes these people look it up and get news articles spinning it left. Js
A simple dude they slapped it down is probably a better way to go but do you
Posted by: Mr pink at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (wZoWU)
Posted by: Warai-otoko at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (VoAdT)
Brother, I’m really worried what else the left has for plan b, c, d etc. They are capable of the most (even more) evil than decent folk like you can think.
Posted by: Eromero at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (o2ZRX)
"My other desire was an M coupe but I never could find one that wasn't ragged out or wildly overpriced. I never could pull the trigger on a 4 cylinder Z3 but I liked them. They just didn't feel as lively as the Mazda once I'd test driven one (they would likely trounce the non-turbo, though). Reliability was a thing for me, too.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples"
Mine had the straight 6. With an open K+N filter it sounded great.
Posted by: AshevilleRobert at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (fv27Y)
Posted by: AZ deplorable moron at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (3LUnX)
He needs a haircut, and confesses ignorance of the oddest thing.
He thought ben-wa balls were the balls of someone named "Benoit" for example
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (D7oie)
Posted by: Archimedes
No, they would have to pass a law and then there would be court cases whether or not he was actually an insurrectionist in the meaning of the criminal federal statute because Trump did not a) give an oath to an insurrectionist government b) directly call for his supporters to violently overthrow the existing government under the std of Brandenburg v Ohio, c) left office as scheduled.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:29 PM (N1tpc
------------
Immunity is a bigger hill to climb but I gotta tell you, their Trumps legal brief has some serious meat on the bones.
Posted by: WisRich at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (G0vdT)
Posted by: AZ deplorable moron at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (3LUnX)
Posted by: steevy at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM
It's overrated...trust me.
Posted by: Aaron Bushnell at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (5sOEG)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging
--------------------
Right, they cling harder. More harder please.
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (bs59e)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
Best laugh of the day....so far.
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (AwYPR)
Hopefully this ruling leads to more liberals protesting in front of the supreme court by turning themselves in to bbq.
Posted by: Rbastid at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (iWE3b)
*pardon my language, ladies.
Posted by: Aetius451AD
-
Yep. We saw it with our own eyes (Texas had no standing), and now they're confirming it.
It's weird to see everything you grew up believing so strongly in be shown to have no substance.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (Yui9f)
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (bWsRe)
BREAKING HUGE NEWS
Federal appeals court allows Texas immigration law to take effect.
Law enforcement officers in Texas are now authorized to arrest & jail any illegal immigrants crossing the border.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (wb1YC)
I think this is Obama's most underrated accomplishment (from the viewpoint of the left): the utter corruption of the judiciary with unprincipled, leftist hacks.
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (CsUN+)
idk, but my first guess is -- it would require a impeachment AND conviction by the Senate, which would be 2/3rds majority?
Posted by: illiniwek at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (Cus5s)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (tkR6S)
The decision makes a point of saying Convicted. No one has been convicted of insurrection. Trump hasn't even been charged with insurrection.
Posted by: sharon(willow's apprentice) at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (t/2Uw)
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (wb1YC)
My fingers keep typing that instead of juvenile
Not sure what is going on.
Petulant. Childish. Those spring to mind.
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (uKImU)
Okay... I just spit my coffee out on that one... Boy Scout ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024
***
A Boy Scout who steals all the Girl Scout cookies.
And by cookies I mean billions of dollars.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (J2vNu)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (AcWfM)
Posted by: Ordinary American at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (eWDZa)
I beg to differ.
She'd be welcome sum up a sex act by putting my cock in her mouth.
But that's about it.
Posted by: Julius Caesar, Fishing on the banks of the Rubicon and cracking a few cold ones at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (W5ArC)
*pardon my language, ladies.
Posted by: Aetius451AD
========
ACB said the quiet part out loud. Rather stupid of her but yes, Scotus has created injustices to 'cool things down' including the Dred Scott decision. Taney and the majority thought Scotus could resolve teh slavery issue by making slavery national in scope.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: Not trying to be mean but... at March 04, 2024 12:30 PM (xQGdr)
Get Yer Flavor-Aid here! Get Yer Flavor-Aid here! Free Flavor-Aid! Here Ya go...
Please get in line...here ya go...next!
Posted by: Flavor-Aid Jonestown SpecialFor democrats... at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (/SHEi)
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (bWsRe)
=======
Where is that restriction outlined? The one about being convicted of a crime?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (GBKbO)
"The efforts ultimately resulted in a $3 million investment..."
Posted by: SMOD at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (RHGPo)
He needs a haircut, and confesses ignorance of the oddest thing.
He thought ben-wa balls were the balls of someone named "Benoit" for example
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (D7oie)
Not growing up with an overwhelming exposure to pron isn't a bad thing.......
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (Zz0t1)
BREAKING HUGE NEWS
Federal appeals court allows Texas immigration law to take effect.
Law enforcement officers in Texas are now authorized to arrest & jail any illegal immigrants crossing the border.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM (wb1YC)
The melt downs today should be epic
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Anti-Faucist at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (qUkBO)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (pVWRI)
Olberman became a mansplaining, misogynist, ray-cisst faster today than Decrepit Joe can say "Jill, change my Depends!"
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (5fDan)
That's Roberts' justification for upholding Obamacare.
The reputation of the Court in liberal circles was at risk, and protecting the reputation of the Court was more important than upholding the law.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (YAtuc)
Posted by: Archimedes
No, they would have to pass a law and then there would be court cases whether or not he was actually an insurrectionist in the meaning of the criminal federal statute because Trump did not a) give an oath to an insurrectionist government b) directly call for his supporters to violently overthrow the existing government under the std of Brandenburg v Ohio, c) left office as scheduled.
And yet, all three of those factors were missing before this latest ruling, and it made it to SCOTUS. (I assume you meant DIDN'T leave office)
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (CsUN+)
161 Most of the psychopaths on the Left are women. American women for the most part are now unbearable .
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (MNhXM)
Some studies are showing GenZ men are trending right, while GenZ wymynses are trending left. Insane women are gonna be with us for a long time unfortunately.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (bWsRe)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (tkR6S)
Is that stuff still available in Canada? The nanny-staters banned it here some years ago.
Considering that most of us of a Certain Age were drenched in gallons of that stuff before puberty, how bad could it have been?
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: Blast Hardcheese at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (PWI4f)
Posted by: 13times at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (n/VGw)
Posted by: gnats local 678 at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (B1FKF)
How's this for dumbing down. Fuck you douchebag.
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (MNhXM)
Article II, I believe.
Hamilton was most explicit on this as well.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (4p0Xq)
Posted by: 13times at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (n/VGw)
=======
Tell me this person would personally burn Trump ballots without telling me this person would personally burn Trump ballots.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (GBKbO)
No, it would have to require Congress to declare an insurrection (exception to habeas for example) and then write a law to punish it under the 14th as a civil matter.
There is an existing criminal law that includes ineligibility to federal office already if a person is convicted of insurrection (jury trial, unanimous verdict, etc. )
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (bk5GW)
http://tiny.cc/y036xz
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (D7oie)
Did Benoit Mandelbrot have fractal balls?
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (GBKbO)
No I’m saying if that were to be added as a restriction, by a law passed by congress.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (bWsRe)
He thought ben-wa balls were the balls of someone named "Benoit" for example
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (D7oie)
A bunny's balls?
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (di6C2)
Then for BIG decisions (ie Obamacre) he RULES for the Liberals. EVERY TIME!!!!.
I'd say this is a pretty big decision. But Roberts was pretty much between a rock and a hard place. Even if he wanted to rule the other way, he knew it was a loser and more than anything, he
Posted by: Oddbob at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (sNc8Y)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
Constitutional Republic, fucksticks.
Damned godless commie retards.
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (ufFY8)
Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
those fuckers are batshit crazy
Posted by: Hatari somewhere on Ventura Highway
And they vote.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (63Dwl)
Posted by: Sid at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (BPtic)
Tfg...
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (wb1YC)
Posted by: PabloD at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (sfZkd)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (pVWRI)
Two scoops Donny might have gone for three today.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (AJDwy)
Posted by: Ordinary American at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (eWDZa)
Article II, I believe.
Hamilton was most explicit on this as well.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (+DDBS)
=======
The Article outlining the rules of impeachment of a sitting president? How does that involve the court? How does that prevent ballot access?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: vic at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (A5THL)
Wow
Posted by: torabora at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (OUiUM)
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (di6C2)
That is actually what an impeachment is, and it is the one thing Congress can do about the other branches of government.
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (D7oie)
Olberman became a mansplaining, misogynist, ray-cisst faster today than Decrepit Joe can say "Jill, change my Depends!"
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:36 PM (5fDan)
_________
Well, he's not wrong about Jackson and Sotomayor. Both are dumb as rocks. Soto was a long-time judge at both the trial and appellate levels in NY federal courts. Her stupidity and laziness were legendary.
Kagan is a leftwing nut but she'ds not dumb.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (iFTx/)
Posted by: 13times at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (n/VGw)
Sounds insurrectiony
Posted by: Cuthbert the Witless at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (Ow+08)
Re: the Immunity decision. If they rule against Trump, Mr. Paxton in Texas had best have an arms dealing case against Barry and his minions within the day.
I've been thinking about the business with the 9th Circuit for a bit now, and I think it would be in the best interests of the next Republican administration to make the same sort of ruling they did in 2013 that lets Hawaii judge Texas's circuit in part due to "overflow" and reroute all the DC decisions to, say, Mississippi. And then bring about Armageddon for some agencies.
Posted by: American Hawkman at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (skAOD)
People see the law is being used as a corrupt political tool by Democrats to punish their opposition. You have a corrupt AG in NY, for one, who along with a corrupt jurist just convicted Trump when no laws were broken, nor harm proven. In fact the opposite. That same AG has persecuted the NRA and just went after beef producers. Nobody even knows who is next. At some point that leads to people completely ignoring and disrespecting the law because it is no longer blind, fair or credible. I think SCOTUS largely sees this coming.
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (Iusta)
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (iFTx/)
@GregAbbott_TX
BREAKING HUGE NEWS
Federal appeals court allows Texas immigration law to take effect.
Law enforcement officers in Texas are now authorized to arrest & jail any illegal immigrants crossing the border.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM
That's TWO! Is it too much to hope for a Fani Willis disbarment/removal today for number THREE?
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (RKVpM)
http://tiny.cc/y036xz
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn)
Shade of hair is not natural, but the freckles and skin tone certainly seem to be.
+1
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (2ocoG)
@JDVance1
Why did so many law professors fall for a garbage legal theory the Supreme Court just struck down unanimously?
No one "fell" for anything. This was a want.
That's all.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (JpKTL)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (MNhXM)
Starting to understand why muslims in 700AD lost their shit.
Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (VwHCD)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn)
Not a real redhead, but fiery nonetheless.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (Zz0t1)
http://tiny.cc/y036xz
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn
The only thing she's mulling over is how salty that last soul was.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (AJDwy)
These assholes really want to go there?
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (bWsRe)
It dissolves the justification in the absence of Conviction for the underlying charge.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (GBKbO)
No I’m saying if that were to be added as a restriction, by a law passed by congress.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (bWsRe)
========
Except, it would be a law overriding the written word of the Constitution. That restriction is not there.
The only actual and proper way to do it would be to amend the constitution.
If we're talking proper, not Calvinball.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (Akjoo)
And by cookies I mean billions of dollars.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (J2vNu)
Oh i bet ol' shitpants has spent a lot of time in the Scouts.
Posted by: Warai-otoko at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (VoAdT)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (uKImU)
her eyes are glued to MSNBC all day long
Posted by: kallisto at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (dCxaZ)
this is about me, isn't it?
Posted by: fang fang at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (sGtp+)
http://tiny.cc/y036xz
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn)
________
Bangable
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (iFTx/)
this is in my experience true - my boys are pretty based, my daughter tries so hard to "be good" which to her means leftist I guess
they registered to vote and she (eldest) won't. she says the pressure from her friends to vote for Biden is too great; she's afraid to just say I won't vote for him so she hides behind "I don't believe in voting" and refuses to register.
she also believes like 60 percent of leftist dogma, and she's about as good as it gets right now for young ladies at least around here.
maybe there are a lot just under the radar trying to avoid being outcast by the Longhouse Women they live amongst. maybe if there's a sea change politically they will shift with it (that is normally what happens)
I guess we'll see
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (AcWfM)
Just curious, if Congress found Trump had engaged in insurrection, is that just a simple majority vote? Or is that the same rules for impeachment?
Even that sounds like a stretch. I would argue the original intent of these laws was dealing with the Confederacy and all of these "insurrection" laws are simply no longer valid.
Posted by: Blago at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (5GvcP)
***
I fully expect some time in the next 10 years for there to be a guy with a backhoe digging up Keith's backyard while a uniformed cop and a guy in a trench coat watch.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (wb1YC)
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (ufFY
Can never be said enough.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM (wb1YC)
Tomorrow will begin a record-setting profit period for dentists from coast-to-coast. Every Leftist will be making appointments to get replacements for teeth they are at this instant grinding down to their gums.
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (5fDan)
‘ Trump won the 2016 election on a technicality. ’
The constitution and the rule of law are a technicality to these people.
In my version of democracy, I could see me napalming these shits.
Posted by: Dr. Claw at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (jbnUc)
And by cookies I mean billions of dollars.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere at March 04, 2024 12:35 PM
And touches all the brownies.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at March 04, 2024 12:41 PM (5sOEG)
All those who pushed this have the same delusion - their wishes are reality.
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (uKImU)
- Left
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (bWsRe)
_______
Well, they did. Some Confederate officers were able to resume rank in the Army. IIRC, 3 did. And one, Joseph Wheeler, also served in Congress.
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (1bNHn)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:27 PM (JCZqz)
Best laugh of the day....so far.
Posted by: BignJames
===
The DUmp was a DNC creation to keep the loomey proggies isolated in 2001. Now the DUmp is the leading think tank for the DNC and leads the democrat party's thinking.
Change my mind.
Posted by: Jukin the Deplorable a Clear and Present Danger at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (17s+e)
http://tiny.cc/y036xz
Looks like she's trying to figure out who to call to get her off the parking block upon which it is currently high centered.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (2ocoG)
At her age and the dudes who circle her, I'll bet she is.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (di6C2)
But maybe someone did. Does it ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:20 PM (KRtlO)
-------------
Good one, Ace.
The judges would have also accepted "middling glitterocrities."
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (x2W85)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (MvF+J)
It dissolves the justification in the absence of Conviction for the underlying charge.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (+DDBS)
========
No, they're completely disconnected processes. An impeachment could include the punishment of being barred from future elected office, but that's impeachment, not a statute or a judicial ruling.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Intercepted DU
Boy scouts are no longer pedo proof so Brandon might just be a BS.
Posted by: AZ deplorable moron at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (3LUnX)
Posted by: Jen the original at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (1q8Fq)
that was my other thought.
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (KRtlO)
Posted by: Pudinhead at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (FmapG)
Posted by: Montec.
She and the other concurrences are misreading the Constitution and the amendment. The Constitutional provisions were not at issue in the case, only the meaning of the 14th Amendment which specifically does not change constitutional eligibility for office--it adds that Congress has the power to create a law that punishes those engaged like in the South of a widespread insurrection against the established government by civil and criminal means. There is a criminal statute that already allows a candidate to be disqualified for office if they are tried and convicted in federal criminal court of engaging in insurrection. The civil law allowing disqualification lapsed in the 1890's.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (bk5GW)
As a group, unmarried women are the fascist class in the United States - men and married women are fine.
It's why the Democrats are so desperately trying to undermine the institution of traditional marriage.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (YAtuc)
---
Ever since one of my friends went into Law school, and seeing how he talked with his law school classmates, I am convinced that the legal profession is dominated by people who think that their ability to make an argument for a position makes it the truth.
I suspect that this is sort of a soft requirement for lots of kinds of legal work. It's a lot easier to do defense work if you can honestly convince yourself that your client is innocent, and a lot easier to prosecute someone if you sincerely think they deserve it. So it seems like a lot of what happens in law school is molding you into the kind of person who is very good at making complicated and technical arguments while at the same time jedi mind tricking themselves into believing those arguments.
Posted by: joe, living dangerously at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (fKIdX)
_____________
They aren't falling for it. They know that legal theory is legal analysis is dying. Power is all that matters. Sometimes the power doesn't match up like in this case. Desire of result and how far you can go trumps legal reasoning. Legal reasoning prevails when you've stepped too far out of line but only because popular sentiment will not allow for your insane result.
Posted by: SH (no more socks) at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (sX1BW)
Posted by: This Is CNN at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (Zz86T)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:38 PM (HnUIn)
Not a real redhead, but fiery nonetheless.
can't check at work, so can't determine whether butt mostly peaceful
Posted by: anachronda at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (sGtp+)
Bangable
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:40 PM (iFTx/)
With all of George Washington's 1000 g*ddamn dicks.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (+DDBS)
++++
That's very specific.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (HnUIn)
161 Most of the psychopaths on the Left are women. American women for the most part are now unbearable .
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (MNhXM)
Some studies are showing GenZ men are trending right, while GenZ wymynses are trending left. Insane women are gonna be with us for a long time unfortunately.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:37 PM (bWsRe)
WHY WONT YOU WATCH OUR ALL WAMMENS GIRL POWER SUPERHERO MOVIES. WAHHHHHHHH.
DADDY WHY DID YOU EAT MY FRENCH FRIES??!!
Posted by: Howling BBC Feminist Manifesto Choir at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (Ow+08)
It's become clear that men (or "men") like French, Paul Krugman, etc. get off on public humiliation.
You just know he has a ball gag, a pair of fishnets, a dog collar, and a pair of stilettos in his closet, for the occasional public outing.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (W5ArC)
Wow
Posted by: torabora
When you owe a cartel $3 million dollars, they own you.
When the cartels owes you $3 million dollars worth of coke, you own the cartel.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (JpKTL)
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (mupln)
Posted by: David French at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (f45Vt)
****
Then there's that other "Leader"
The one with 6% approval that is shuffling off the stage as slow as possible after 17 years of ruining the country.
Posted by: torabora at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (OUiUM)
Posted by: AshevilleRobert
-
Interestingly, that engine was part of why I started leaning toward the Miata. They had extremely similar engine output and overall performance, but the Miata was substantially lighter and I was (still am, frankly) a weirdo about lightness at the time. If I could've found the right one of those I probably could've been convinced, though. A buddy had one and it was a lot of fun.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (Yui9f)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: Blago at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (5GvcP)
Posted by: anchorbabe fashion cop at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (ufFY8)
And to think, this all started because they laughed at him being President and then he won because Hillary is so horrible. Then the knives came out.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (AJDwy)
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (+DDBS)
I am assuming car was supposed to be in there? I love these kinds of comments- they are like puzzle boxes.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (di6C2)
Especially when her husband is deployed.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (YAtuc)
Brother, I’m really worried what else the left has for plan b, c, d etc. They are capable of the most (even more) evil than decent folk like you can think.
Posted by: Eromero at March 04, 2024 12:33 PM (o2ZRX)
Sadly, you are correct, sir.
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (5fDan)
-----------------
So, congress could do this to the cabinet right now?
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (bs59e)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Formerly Virginian at March 04, 2024 12:17 PM (N1tpc)
Shows the stateof US law and constitutionality that we are shocked by the 9-0, doesn't it?
Posted by: Question Authority bumper sticker at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (Rbu5d)
Posted by: Eeyore
======
Congress can remove the disability by a 2/3rds vote.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (bk5GW)
Why did so many law professors fall for a garbage legal theory the Supreme Court just struck down unanimously? ...
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:21 PM (W5ArC)
++++
They didn't, of course. They didn't "fall for" anything, and they don't subscribe to *any* kind of legal theory.
They're Party men. It's Party men all the way down. And good Party men support the Party's strategy.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (HnUIn)
________
Yes and no. Mostly this was wishcasting. In fairness, while I thought the legal theory for kicking Trump off the ballot was dogshit, I was not sure the Court would rule that way. I thought there was a non-negligible chance that the 3 liberals plus Roberts would be 4 votes for something other than that. All they would need was to pick off another judge.
But a lot of these law "professors" are also dumb as a bag of dogshit, and might have truly believed that the CO court was correct.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (iFTx/)
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (bk5GW)
======
Alright this is going too far.
Congress can't remove blindness!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (GBKbO)
All those who pushed this have the same delusion - their wishes are reality.
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:42 PM (uKImU)
-----------
It's almost as if they're infantile ... or something. Almost.
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (x2W85)
Especially when her husband is deployed.
Posted by: The ARC of History! at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (YAtuc)
He probably requested it
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (Akjoo)
What I’m saying is if congress makes a law that says anyone convicted of insurrection cannot be president, and then a court convicts someone of insurrection, that person cannot run,
And if I interpret it right, that’s what Kagan said. And I agree with it.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (bWsRe)
Posted by: David French at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (f45Vt)
He's going to have to hire 20 dudes to bang his wife after this ruling.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:44 PM (bs59e)
++++
Bills of attainder are explicitly forbidden in the Constitution.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: This Is CNN at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (Zz86T)
Hey! You stole our headline!
Posted by: The Bulwark at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (PiwSw)
Posted by: Jukin the Deplorable a Clear and Present Danger at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (17s+e)
Trump pretty much just talking about the other cases against him.
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (RKVpM)
Posted by: American Hawkman at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (skAOD)
Even semi-rational leftists will realize the Pandora's box that would be opened if the POTUS does not enjoy immunity from state prosecution for official acts.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (JIdXK)
imagine these people
imagine being them
the next few years are gonna hurt
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (AcWfM)
Posted by: Deplorable Minion at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (as3uC)
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (oCjPU)
But a lot of these law "professors" are also dumb as a bag of dogshit, and might have truly believed that the CO court was correct.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (iFTx/)
++++
I'll take your word for it. From the outside looking in, it all appears fairly simple. The "believe" what the Party instructs them to believe.
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (HnUIn)
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (bWsRe)
Yeah. I have already fired my editor.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: Hawaii 9-0 at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (5h/8D)
Posted by: Ex Rex Reeder at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (MZ+PY)
What I’m saying is if congress makes a law that says anyone convicted of insurrection cannot be president, and then a court convicts someone of insurrection, that person cannot run,
And if I interpret it right, that’s what Kagan said. And I agree with it.
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (bWsRe)
========
That's what the majority says.
The concurrence is leaving open room for the courts to decide that Trump engaged in insurrection without referring to statute.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Thomas Paine at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (4NBCH)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (xcrUy)
Posted by: sharon(willow's apprentice) at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (t/2Uw)
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (oCjPU)
Vornados are good fans.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: joe, living dangerously
--
This is probably about right. Similar to how you can ask a normal person what a woman is and they'll tell you, but ask a person who is convinced that they're one of the Smart People the same question and they'll do their best to confuse everyone and avoid the question.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (Yui9f)
using obamacare as a precedent, nancy pelosi could just deem him an insurrectionist.
Posted by: anachronda at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (sGtp+)
Even semi-rational leftists will realize the Pandora's box that would be opened if the POTUS does not enjoy immunity from state prosecution for official acts.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (JIdXK)
========
Alternate:
They completely eliminate all governmental immunity to get Trump.
Please?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (5fDan)
Ridiculous!!!!
Posted by: Orson at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (dIske)
Judge picks matter.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (AJDwy)
Posted by: Ed Snyder at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (Trj8g)
Posted by: People's Hippo Voice at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (N64wW)
Posted by: DaisyB at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (AbL8c)
Posted by: joe, living dangerously at March 04, 2024 12:43 PM (fKIdX)
Actually, having been through law school, it's a bit worse than that. They talk about "thinking like a lawyer" and they work to mold you into the kind of person who is very good at making complicated and technical arguments while at the same time teaching you that there is no such thing as "objective truth", that everything is situational, and that getting the win for the clients and the money for yourself is all that ever really matters.
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (i9ffA)
- bill of attainder, and
- ex post facto
A few months ago wiki had one case in the last hundred years. Guy was convicted of espionage, ran for election (US senate or rep), win, then the Legislature said he was ineligible and turned him away.
I assume 'espionage' was already codified as a disqualifier under the 19th.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (pUIaK)
Adulthood is of course even more cutthroat than the school playground, and after spending 12 years being mediocre in the public school system, the average person will see the metrics between individuals only increase in number as an adult (ie: wealth, careerism, sexuality, and status are added to intelligence, strength, and charm), and, seeing as its likely they won’t come out a genetic lottery winner, the average person will probably just give up at this point—deciding that it is their lot in life to be a glittering mediocrity, and submit to a life of being fat, ignorant, and cloddish, a dumb bellowing beast in human clothing, completely incapable of any greatness or positive effect on the world around them.
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (D7oie)
lol maybe they are
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (AcWfM)
Congress can't remove blindness!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (GBKbO)
------------
"WHY HASN'T CONGRESS REPEALED THE LAW OF GRAVITY ALREADY -- THINK OF THE BENEFITS!"
-- Donkey-Chompers
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (x2W85)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (GBKbO)
It does? Well shit then I’m confused. This is why I H8 lawyers. 🤣
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (bWsRe)
Judge picks matter.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (AJDwy)
========
"Re-elect me, and get more of this!"
-Mitch McConnell
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (GBKbO)
One problem is that SCOTUS has to face the fact that many - perhaps most - courts in America are uninterested in justice. Roberts, in particular, has been in total denial about that. And, given his position, he is making it worse.
Is there any punishment we can deal out to these robed bastards?
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (1bNHn)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 12:32 PM (ufFY
Men over 25 should shave their heads bald, anyway.
It's more badass.
Posted by: XTC at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (UnA8+)
Posted by: Joe Mannix (Not a cop!) at March 04, 2024 12:45 PM (HnUIn)
----
Have you learned nothing these last few years? There's always a Christian Nationalist Orangemanbad exception.
Posted by: Morphine Mitch at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (tT6L1)
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (D7oie)
========
That's what the majority says.
The concurrence is leaving open room for the courts to decide that Trump engaged in insurrection without referring to statute.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (GBKbO)
Seems they would have to delete a whole lot of digital media out there where Trump specifically calls for a peaceful march on the capitol for that to happen.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: vic at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (A5THL)
After that, the 16th, 17th, 23rd, and 26th.
Posted by: Rodrigo Borgia at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (W5ArC)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (uKImU)
well said Mr Servo
it's about making mo money for lawyering
just like any racket; this is the point
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (AcWfM)
They really tipped the balance in this 9-0 decision. /
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:49 PM (+DDBS)
Posted by: Montec. at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (bWsRe)
========
Essentially:
"Majority": There are mechanisms for this. They include laws passed by Congress. Congress has passed nothing. Fuck off.
"Minority": Judges should be able to deem him responsible for insurrection because OMB.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (5fDan)
So they can take something out of context and run with it all day
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (Akjoo)
You do not get to decide rulings based on the 'temp' of the country, you are to rule on the LAW.
FFS.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 12:22 PM (di6C2)
[sigh...] I noticed that, too.
Posted by: Question Authority bumper sticker at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (Rbu5d)
One of the principal Pacific officers in the Spanish American War was a previous Confederate officer.
Descension is more today than then.
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (bs59e)
While it is headlining as a reversal of Colo, it is more rationally an affirmation of the several other states where similar case were filed and rejected.
While Colo/Illinois/Maine were all making current headlines, lawfare groups had filed 88 cases in 45 states.
Sc said...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSyueBoC9mE
Posted by: birdog at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (SFGDK)
Posted by: whig
Exactly. TRIED & CONVICTED. Not just claimed.
Discovery of pipe bombs & Ray Epps would be a bitch. Officers unlocking doors. Escorting people in.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (JpKTL)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (2ocoG)
The Kochs pulled out, so...
Posted by: anchorbabe fashion cop at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (ufFY8)
Judge picks matter.
Sooooo....you're saying you want me back? I KNEW IT!
Posted by: The Turtle at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM (CsUN+)
What did Sotomayor, Kagen, and Brown Jackson receive in payment?
Keep in mind, it might be easier for us to beat Trump in November than some GOP dark horse I truly believe he is such damaged goods, he would be easier to beat than someone that might take more of the independent vote.
I agree, except for the real danger of all the myriad ways they cheat, steal and suppress voters. He didn't "win" last time, but got the office anyway. As do many with an R after their name.
Because of the media's bias toward generating shareholder profits as opposed to truth in news, Biden is much less popular than he should be. It might be that someone who seems sane like what's her name could win. I don't think Trumpy stands a chance.
Exactly how Hitler slowly gained more and more power. It didn't happen overnight. Your witnessing it right here,right now...
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (JCZqz)
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (AJDwy)
Posted by: Aetius451AD
---
I'm a fan fan. This is a good fan. Now I want another for upstairs.
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (AcWfM)
They really tipped the balance in this 9-0 decision. /
Posted by: garrett at March 04
If I were alive it would have been 9-0 in favor of hanging trump.
Posted by: Zombie RBG at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (Ow+08)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (JCZqz)
=======
I wonder if these people believe polls.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (GBKbO)
Even semi-rational leftists will realize the Pandora's box that would be opened if the POTUS does not enjoy immunity from state prosecution for official acts.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 12:46 PM (JIdXK)
_______
I'm much less optimistic than you are (and others above who say the same thing). It's the "for official acts" that would be doing a lot of heavy lifting. While I think a majority of judges would agree in theory that "POTUS has immunity for official acts," there is a lot of leeway in there to determine that what Trump actually did was not an official act. I can see the quips right now: "Insurrection is not an official act." "Crimes aren't official acts." Etc etc. I think at least the 3 liberals will go that way.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (iFTx/)
Posted by: Hairyback Guy at March 04, 2024 12:23 PM (/SHEi)
Then the stocks, with buckets of rotting vegetables close by for the public to use.
Posted by: Question Authority bumper sticker at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (Rbu5d)
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (AJDwy)
The Supreme Court gave Hitler all the support he needed, no doubt.
Posted by: garrett at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (+DDBS)
S.B. my epitaph.
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: Blake - semi lurker at large at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (tT6L1)
I agree, except for the real danger of all the myriad ways they cheat, steal and suppress voters. He didn't "win" last time, but got the office anyway. As do many with an R after their name.
Okay... This is completely delusional....
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM (2ocoG)
Where's John Holmes to smack her in the face with 8" of limpdick.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (Zz0t1)
Exactly how Hitler slowly gained more and more power. It didn't happen overnight. Your witnessing it right here,right now...
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (JCZqz)
========
1. I love the accusations that the media that propped up the Russian collusion narrative for literally years are secret right wing provacateurs.
2. They did a Hitler!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (GBKbO)
Wow
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions
--
this person lives in an alternate reality
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (oCjPU)
CNN Friday: President Biden heads to Camp David carrying a book about breaking through conflicts
In part, U.S. President Joe Biden is spending the weekend at Camp David, and as he left the White House on Friday, he was carrying a copy of "Possible: How We Survive (and Thrive) in an Age of Conflict."
--------------
Absolutely nothing listed on President's public schedule today other than:
(Camp David) In the morning, the President will receive the President’s Daily Brief. This meeting will be closed press.
(Camp David) No Pool Call Time
Posted by: L - We're done for now. We just don't have the guts to turn off the lights on the show at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (GshMh)
What part of 1861 escaped you?
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (CsUN+)
Posted by: gourmand du jour
Do you know how many STDs are in that shit? Best use is just rinsing off your chrome bumpers.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (IG4Id)
Posted by: This Is CNN at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (Zz86T)
I can only hope it was in reaction to his liberal tears.
Posted by: WisRich at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (G0vdT)
tanned, rested, and ready
Posted by: chatjippity at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: Nick in Tallahassee at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (7PziG)
HEY! Elic Swarwerr! Me Chinese Ho too! Where my mirion dowwas? Me rove you rong time, get nothing but cramydia!
Posted by: Fang Fang Gang Bang Wang Dang Sweet Poontang at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (W5ArC)
***
Lol. They're getting off easy. Trump burnt Fani Willis and her boyfriend down to the water line this past weekend.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (wb1YC)
Even that sounds like a stretch. I would argue the original intent of these laws was dealing with the Confederacy and all of these "insurrection" laws are simply no longer valid.
Posted by: Blago
========
No, Congress would have to pass a specific law that set about the conditions of the 'insurrection' like the Enforcement Act of 1870 Sections 14 and 15 using quo warranto procedure. It can't constitutionally do so by name due to the bill of attainder clause but has to write general language that allows federal courts to decide who is and is not to be excluded from the ballot.
==========
18 US Code 2383 still applies.
"Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (bk5GW)
he can read?!?!?!
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (AcWfM)
Now to go read the EV follies.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:52 PM (oCjPU)
========
"I read about a little black lady in FL who couldn't get a voter ID card in July of 2020. She was suppressed!"
*follow up story showed that little black lady went to the DMV and got her voter ID card in August of 2020 and voted in November...for DeSantis and Trump*
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: paulnjax at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (j5/wM)
Their obvious plan to remove Trump from the ballot at the last minute for a 'real' reason goes down in flames.
Posted by: DudeAbiding at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (setIA)
I refer to arguments made by attorneys as legal logic which has no basis in real logic.
That the one sentence 2nd amendment is still being interpreted / litigated over 200 years from its ratification tells you all you need to know .
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: The View Showrunners at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (PiwSw)
Hell, the Democrats had 2 years where they could have just made every political enemy ineligible for office forever. Anyone that questioned vote fraud was labeled an insurrectionist.
Posted by: Blago at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (5GvcP)
he can read?!?!?!
Posted by: BlackOrchid at March 04, 2024 12:53 PM (AcWfM)
LOL, I was thinking the same thing. And no he can't. He can hardly read his dummy cards
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (pVWRI)
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:54 PM (AJDwy)
BREAKING HUGE NEWS
Federal appeals court allows Texas immigration law to take effect.
Law enforcement officers in Texas are now authorized to arrest & jail any illegal immigrants crossing the border.
Posted by: Azathoth at March 04, 2024 12:34 PM
You're gonna need a bigger jail
Posted by: Martin Brody at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (/6GbT)
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (mupln)
You can burn down Fani's boy toy by simply posting a picture of his wife and a picture of Fani.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (2ocoG)
Waiting for the women of "The View" to weigh in provide the depth of analysis and meaning to this decision that minor thinkers like French and Olberman simply cannot because of their whiteness. And alleged penises.
Posted by: Auspex at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (j4U/Z)
Posted by: Martin Brody at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (/6GbT)
Isn't mexico a Jail?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (pVWRI)
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (wGerL)
Wow
Posted by: torabora at March 04, 2024 12:39 PM
Enough for a weekend at Bernie's!
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (4p0Xq)
With that background, this decision is all the more sweeping. It's a giant fuck you to the tyrannical left, and an endorsement of the fundamental right to vote.
I pray the court doesn't now feel like they "owe one" to the lefties and start allowing Jack Smith to go nuts.
Posted by: The Frumious Follywood at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (Ch4PH)
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (wGerL
Why though?
Worried about their reputation?
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (AJDwy)
Posted by: Lady in Black at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (mupln)
________
I'm not convinced they aren't AI bots or mostly AI bots programmed to regurgitate far left tropes.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (iFTx/)
The Julias are married to Uncle Sugar.
Some of them would be ok on their own, but I suspect most realize that absent Uncle Sugar's endless pocketbook they'd either have pay their own way or conduct themselves in a way to win a wage earning husband...neither of which do they want to do.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (ibTVg)
Yea, that was a tough call alright. Seeing as how the Constitution makes that explicitly clear its kind of an impediment to the lawless left.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (LkLld)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (uKImU)
There is a group dynamic at work here. The more delusional you sound, the more you demonstrate your bona fides as member of the group.
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (wGerL)
I pray the court doesn't now feel like they "owe one" to the lefties and start allowing Jack Smith to go nuts.
Posted by: The Frumious Follywood at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (Ch4PH)
========
Dobbs was pretty sweeping, and word was that Roberts was desperately trying to make it some kind of weird middle ground, to no avail.
Roberts' power on SCOTUS seems to be minimal at the moment. Losing Kennedy and RBG really fucked him.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:55 PM (wGerL)
......
They had to bribe Sotomayor with a burrito.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (v0R5T)
---
is insurrection a crime?
if so, I would think that would have to be adjudicated in court, with a jury reaching a verdict
or is insurrection something else, according to law, where someone can simply point and howl like Donald Sutherland in Invasion Of The Body Snatchers ?
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (AwYPR)
There is no automatic get convicted of a crime and be removed from office other than the US Code cited above for a federal conviction.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (bk5GW)
So if a Dem Congress wants to remove their biggest opponent for the presidency, all they need to do is vote that he's an insurrectionist? I can see no way this could go wrong.
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 12:26 PM (CsUN+)
_______
That is exactly what a bill of attainder is.
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (1bNHn)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (uKImU)
Do they still claim Ana Navarro is a Conservative ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (RKVpM)
Posted by: neverenoughcaffeine at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (2NHgQ)
What do you think is going to happen when THEY believe the election is stolen?
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (Yui9f)
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (v0R5T)
Actually, two burritos.
Posted by: Leaked SC email at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (PiwSw)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (GBKbO)
=========
Because they are weasels.
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (bs59e)
There is no automatic get convicted of a crime and be removed from office other than the US Code cited above for a federal conviction.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (bk5GW)
========
At some point, the American people will act like presidential impeachment is dead letter, but it is not that day!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (GBKbO)
They're not even pretending anymore.
Posted by: sharon(willow's apprentice) at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (t/2Uw)
I think the surrender conservative now is some Arab.
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (wGerL)
Posted by: DanMan at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (8uzBS)
What do you think is going to happen when THEY believe the election is stolen?
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (Yui9f)
=======
2017-2020?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (GBKbO)
Bugaloo my friends.
Posted by: Queequeg the Harpooner at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (qVV8U)
The Kochs pulled out, so...
Posted by: anchorbabe fashion cop at March 04, 2024 12:50 PM
Isn't it just one Koch now that one of the two brothers is dead?
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: davidt at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (SYTee)
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (RKVpM)
=====
Two flaming skulls in a row? Can we handle it?
Posted by: Jordan61 at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (DRSnL)
30kg at typical $100/g. But maybe he pays more for the certified fentanyl-free stuff. Best practice.
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:51 PM (GBKbO)
----
These people will believe the Moon is made of green cheese if enough of them say it...
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (7fElN)
What do you think is going to happen when THEY believe the election is stolen?
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM
Speaking of, ammo seems higher than normal right now. Seriously. Anyone got any good outlets for ammo?
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (4p0Xq)
Compared to the rest of them, she's probably conservative in her eating habits.
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (uKImU)
In the 24 years the left has been telling us about "massive voter suppression" they've never actually presented a case of a citizen eligible to vote that was not allowed to.
Similar to your story there was a specific black woman the FNM made a big deal about not being able to vote in '04 - she had recently moved and made some kind of mistake in registering to vote in her new community. Anyway...if you actually followed up on the story you found out she cast a provisional ballot which was then counted.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (ibTVg)
They're not even pretending anymore.
Posted by: sharon(willow's apprentice) at March 04, 2024 12:59 PM (t/2Uw
Practicing for the SOTU speech.... Translation... Getting drugged up
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (Akjoo)
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (yACxx)
Posted by: The Frumious Follywood
As you wrote, The Roberts Court.
It's a religion for the Acela Corridor Courtesans.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (IG4Id)
I understand if you say such things you are a true blue insurrectionist and should head directly to the gulag.
Posted by: Piper at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (ZdaMQ)
Worried about their reputation?
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:56 PM (AJDwy)
If the state judges can make these decisions then the supreme court's value is nil
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (D7oie)
"Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."
Point it, no one has been charged with this - certainly not Trump. That was the farce behind the entire thing; if you want to say someone is guilty of insurrection, then you need to indict them under this statute and hold a trial. It is a violation of Due Process to declare someone guilty of a crime when there has been no trial.
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (i9ffA)
What do you think is going to happen when THEY believe the election is stolen?
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples -
--------------------------
Not much.
They can't it's not the end of his term and people are not ready to buy another dose of hysteria crap.
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (bs59e)
if so, I would think that would have to be adjudicated in court, with a jury reaching a verdict
or is insurrection something else, according to law, where someone can simply point and howl like Donald Sutherland in Invasion Of The Body Snatchers ?
Posted by: Don Black
___
What's scary is they could easily produce this in a DC courtroom. They convicted like podcasters that weren't at the capitol on Jan 6 as insurrectionists.
Posted by: Blago at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (5GvcP)
Do they still claim Ana Navarro is a Conservative ?
Posted by: It's me donna at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (Akjoo)
Carnivore, maybe......
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Ted Torgerson DeSantis/Lake 2024 at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (wGerL)
This. You can see this in how twitter ... magnifies psychopathy. Everyone has to out do the other. It is another reason the internet has made things more radicalized.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (di6C2)
Judge picks matter.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (AJDwy)
------------
The 2020 Texas (and 19 other states) v. Pennsylvania case begs to differ.
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (x2W85)
Similar to your story there was a specific black woman the FNM made a big deal about not being able to vote in '04 - she had recently moved and made some kind of mistake in registering to vote in her new community. Anyway...if you actually followed up on the story you found out she cast a provisional ballot which was then counted.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (ibTVg)
=======
I invented mine because I am a LIAR!
I was just being satirical regarding how the "voter suppression" stories play out.
I'm good at the whole lying thing. I even do it in long form.
Buy my books!
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (GBKbO)
And one, Joseph Wheeler, also served in Congress.
Posted by: Eeyore
He was elected from Alabama to multiple terms in the House. He also served in the U. S. Army as a general in the Spanish-American War.
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (xG4kz)
---
to be fair, the Left feels any time they lose an election, it was stolen
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (GBKbO)
=========
Because they are weasels.
Posted by: Braenyard at March 04, 2024 12:58 PM (bs59e)
---
"Eagles may soar, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines." -- ancient proverb
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (7fElN)
The left: Anyone that claims a sacred election in our holy democracy was stolen is a NAZI white supremacist insurrectionist and should be banned from holding office.
Also the left: The presidential elections of 1980, 2000, 2004, and 2016 were all stolen
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (D7oie)
Posted by: Axeman at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (krQz2)
Joey being seen holding a book is a prop.
It's like Jimmah Cahtah carrying around an empty suitcase to show how humble and relatable he was.
Posted by: Auspex at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (j4U/Z)
Article III powers include the faithful execution of laws. That includes electoral laws. Even the appearance of impropriety would give a president constitutional cause to investigate or have lesser officers investigate potential breeches of the law. You would really need to legally thread a needle to dismiss that, especially when based on statutes no laws could be broken while pursuing those duties.
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (Iusta)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (MNhXM)
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (i9ffA)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: Pudinhead at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (FmapG)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (KRtlO)
To this day a large percentage of the left still believes Putin helped Trump steal the 2016. Facts don't matter to them, it's all emotion.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (LkLld)
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (Iusta)
=======
SCOTUS is low on needles but has a surplus of hammers.
We shall see.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:03 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (GBKbO)
Well done, TJM. Much better than the gal who said 'If you don't like my politics, don't buy my books.'
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:03 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:03 PM (uKImU)
"Eagles may soar, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines." -- ancient proverb
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (7fElN)
Isn't that "Shit Jefferson Said?"
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Zz0t1)
Word.
Posted by: Dick Cheney at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (V8he0)
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Posted by: rhennigantx at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (ENQN6)
>>Our Star of the West moment is coming this winter if, as seems probable, Trump wins 270 electoral votes and these democrats do something incredibly stupid to keep him out of office.
Trump can get to 270 but it's going to take many bank shots and much English to pull off the trick.
We're more than likely going to get an exact repeat of "The Red Mirage" effect of 2020, Trump will be in the lead, watermains will break in numerous states, voting will stop, every additional tranche of votes will put Trump further behind until his lead is overcome.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (JIdXK)
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Iusta)
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (NpAcC)
-
Some low level nobodies did (and were eventually turned into agents of the left with no legal obligations), but the Democrats and MSM weren't prepared to explain how Trump had stolen the election back then.
Now? An indisputable, overwhelming Trump victory and they'll burn this place to the ground.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Yui9f)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (uKImU)
To this day a large percentage of the left still believes Putin helped Trump steal the 2016. Facts don't matter to them, it's all emotion.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (LkLld)
========
They believe Putin hacked election machines in MI and changed vote totals. There was a poll (spit) that showed more than half of Democrats believed this.
Voting machines that have not been switched out. It's also a central tenet on the left that saying election machines can connect to the internet is conspiracy theorizing.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (MvF+J)
Posted by: Axeman
---
you are too kind
Olberman is completely unspooled from reality
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (oCjPU)
@shipwreckedcrew
I think the Majority is saying:
"This is not going to be a lawfare ground we are going to allow to develop requiring more intervention by the courts into election matters in the future."
They are cutting off the path and telling the political branches they need to solve this.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (LkLld)
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Iusta)
Plus, just good old harassment. It both serves their purpose and warns off anyone who might try something similar.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (di6C2)
depends on what you're trying to use it for.
Posted by: anachronda at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (sGtp+)
There's been yet more revelations, including that the generals, which included commander of the national air force Lt. Gen. Ingo Gerhartz, used off-the-shelf and apparently non-secure video phone technology to discuss highly sensitive matters of national security. One general on the line reportedly dialed in from his hotel room. This made the secretive multi-way call easy for the Kremlin to intercept.
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (N3GIM)
Makes me wonder how much testing was done....or maybe it passed all their testd?
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (AwYPR)
Now? An indisputable, overwhelming Trump victory and they'll burn this place to the ground.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Yui9f)
=======
So...2020?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (MNhXM)
You are correct, because insurrection requires armed resistance, not just protesting or wandering around a building. No one has even tried to charge anyone with insurrection - their game has been to throw the word around to get people to believe it, even though it has no legal basis whatsoever.
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (i9ffA)
Well some argue Putin hacked voting machines, for most of them the argument is Russian aligned individuals and groups purchased facebook ads. Which is stupid for two reasons...
1) How many votes do facebook ads actually move?
2) How many MORE dollars in advertising and their equivalent were spent by China, Europe, or Saudi Arabia? Hell in 2004 the Guardian, a British newspaper, sent British citizens to Ohio to formally campaign for Kerry.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (ibTVg)
If I was on the Court, this would be my concurring opinion.
Posted by: Justice Fuck Right Off With This Noise at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (Ph95D)
Posted by: Intercepted DU Transmissions"
The electoral college is a technicality, a slip-up by the nation's fathers, more of a typo than anything else.
Posted by: Ripley at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (JojsZ)
Judge picks matter.
Posted by: AlaBAMA
The Republic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a fucking campaign
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (IG4Id)
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (D7oie)
Daryl Reaugh said once during a Dallas Stars broadcast "There seems to be a lot of cranial flatulence while handling the puck on both teams tonight."
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (uKImU)
Look at how many books whathisname- the sportsball player- has started!
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (di6C2)
Has to be charged, tried & convicted. THEN they could remove him.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (JpKTL)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (Yui9f)
And one, Joseph Wheeler, also served in Congress.
Posted by: Eeyore
He was elected from Alabama to multiple terms in the House. He also served in the U. S. Army as a general in the Spanish-American War.
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (xG4kz)
______
He's actually a g-g-g uncle of mine. Which is why he died in Brooklyn, visiting his sister. My grandfather remembered him, and went to the funeral.
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (1bNHn)
Posted by: davidt at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (SYTee)
Posted by: Justice Fuck Right Off With This Noise at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (Ph95D)
Do you have an election fund?
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (di6C2)
The usual suspects are screaming racist voter suppression.
Posted by: Queequeg the Harpooner at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (qVV8U)
Someone really ought to tell them that the world of Ayn Rand’s novel was not meant to be aspirational.
Posted by: SMOD at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (RHGPo)
SCOTUS did Orange Team a yuuge favor just by delaying the immunity argument until either May or June (too LZ to look & see).
The decision today was so obvious, & had been so for so long, I doubt anyone on the left was even mildly surprised.
Posted by: mnw at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (NLIak)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (uKImU)
Posted by: Trump poisoned my cat at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (KSNKu)
The usual suspects are screaming racist voter suppression.
Posted by: Queequeg the Harpooner at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (qVV8U)
========
Democrats are suddenly going to do so much worse in 2024 than in 2020 in NC, and it's going to be racism responsible.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (uKImU)
"This is about me, isn't it....."
- - - - - LeBron James, Still on Page One
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (Zz0t1)
Which makes it insane they are trying to make the charge that Trump is guilty of insurrection.
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (MNhXM)
Aside from the Mueller report explicitly saying they found no evidence of any collusion between Trump and Russia we now know, well we did before but we definitely now know, Putin preferred Hillary winning.
He viewed her as more predictable because she would follow the same foreign policy playbook that the uniparty has pushed for decades whereas Trump was an unknown and boy howdy was he right.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (LkLld)
We shall see.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:03 PM (GBKbO)"
I disagree with almost everything Roberts does. But his modus operandi is quite often focused on the credibility of the court. Fortunately that includes not just contemporary impact but potential future impacts of their decisions. Given that, I honestly don't know how they allow Smith to move forward while preserving a future status quo.
Posted by: Marcus T at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (Iusta)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (N3GIM)
I remember watching the GA results come in. At one point there were three tranches of mail in ballots that had the exact vote totals, something like 1100 Biden to 15 Trump.
And this is a state that was basically 50-50 according to the official tally. The odds of this happening naturally were astronomically low - trillions to one.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (ibTVg)
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Posted by: rhennigantx
---
some will argue that this does not say the states have NO power
consider if the word 'the' appeared between 'have' and 'power'
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (d2bW3)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) at March 04, 2024 01:01 PM (xG4kz)
______
He's actually a g-g-g uncle of mine. Which is why he died in Brooklyn, visiting his sister. My grandfather remembered him, and went to the funeral.
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 01:06 PM (1bNHn
He was played by Gary Busey in "The Rough Riders" and as usual with Busey, it was an absolutely hilarious performance! Great movie, too.
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (i9ffA)
Posted by: Anna Puma
_
Yep. Dust cover still on and always where it could be photographed.
Right up until the moment he won the election, and then he stopped reading.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (Yui9f)
I am disappoint.
Posted by: ace at March 04, 2024 01:02 PM (KRtlO)
ace, we all stand on the shoulders of giants, even when we re-invent the wheel.
The funniest joke, the finest tuned turn of phrase means nothing without context. Dropping the bon mot into the right spot like an artisan building a dry-stone wall is the skill.
I have wonderful ideas all the time. The cats remain unimpressed.
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (D7oie)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (uKImU)
=======
I'm touting around Robert E. Howard stories right now to show how I'm really a tall, iron-muscles warrior for justice against evil so unspeakable it will drive you mad.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (GBKbO)
What could go wrong?
Posted by: Anna Puma
I think Corn Pop might get a new corn hole.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (IG4Id)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (uKImU)
Meatloaf sammich here!
Posted by: BignJames at March 04, 2024 01:09 PM (AwYPR)
Posted by: Done that bean there , their, at March 04, 2024 01:09 PM (LcRVs)
Which makes it insane they are trying to make the charge that Trump is guilty of insurrection.
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (MNhXM)
Yes, it's star chamber stuff. Declaring a man guilty of a crime, but refusing to file charges or hold a trial.
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (i9ffA)
Now? An indisputable, overwhelming Trump victory and they'll burn this place to the ground.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Yui9f)
=======
So...2020?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (GBKbO)
_______
I think it will be much worse. At least in 2020, there was still some semblance of law enforcement and that burning down cities might get you prosecuted and sent a way for a long time. We now know that ain't true. Only a tiny fraction of the 2020 arsonists and violent savages were prosecuted, and even then mostly for wrist-slap offenses. 2024 and 2025 will be more emboldened.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (iFTx/)
---
seems to me that would fit the definition of 'bill of attainder'
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (uKImU)
Meatloaf sammich here!
Posted by: BignJames
Frito pie.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (JpKTL)
Now? An indisputable, overwhelming Trump victory and they'll burn this place to the ground.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM
Don't think it will happen. It would have to occur in predominately Black neighborhoods and perhaps you don't see the videos I see but as a group they miss having money to spend - which they had when Trump was in office.
Not saying there won't be pockets of nastiness, but Soros is getting his dick handed to him left and right.
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (RKVpM)
The usual suspects are screaming racist voter suppression.
The left is beyond parody at this point.
And to take a step back when the left screamed that the 2000 election was stolen they were given a broad license to give steps that would improve the process from their perspective - including being given the right to audit the ballots themselves which they famously did and found Bush's votes in FL were slightly undercounted.
If the left were at all concerned about the integrity of elections and hadn't cheated they would have done the same thing in 2020 that the right did in 2000...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (xcrUy)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (N3GIM)
- - - - - LeBron James, Still on Page One
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:07 PM (Zz0t1)
---
You never see these guys reading epic fantasy or science fiction. It's always some political book or literary fiction that makes them popular with a certain crowd.
I doubt they could spell "Malazan" let alone describe a Forkrut Assail or a Jaghut...
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (7fElN)
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (7fElN)
.......
C'mon. Everybody knows it's Swiss.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: Thomas Paine at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (4NBCH)
He said PUSSY!!!!!
Posted by: This... is XiNN at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (llON8)
>>And this is a state that was basically 50-50 according to the official tally. The odds of this happening naturally were astronomically low - trillions to one.
There were people watching the vote totals coming in and they were linear in nature, the voting stops and every new batch of votes had huge lopsided steps of votes for The Meat Puppet.
This happened in ALL of the states that were in dispute, ALL OF THEM!!!!
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (JIdXK)
Posted by: A Nomad of the Memestreams at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (Zz86T)
The neighborhoods of AWFLs and Julias though? Well...maybe. How flammable is box wine exactly?
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Thomas Paine at March 04, 2024 12:47 PM (4NBCH)
He said PUSSY!!!!!
Posted by: This... is XiNN at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (llON
=======
He tried to lead American foreign policy out of alignment with unelected bureaucrats' wishes.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Apply gp Directly To Forehead at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (MvF+J)
Great... but Trump carried NC last time anyway, & he'll win it by significantly more this time.
So it's not like the NC voting reform law, which is a good thing & very welcome, has any electoral college significance.
If it was AZ or NV? Then it would be time to break out the Moet et Chandon.
Posted by: mnw at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (NLIak)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (N3GIM)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (xcrUy)
@TheBabylonBee
CDC Officially Changes COVID Guidelines To Whatever Your Uncle Frank Said About It Years Ago
Posted by: SMOD at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (RHGPo)
Not saying there won't be pockets of nastiness, but Soros is getting his dick handed to him left and right.
Posted by: Divide by Zero at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (RKVpM)
I'll only be satisfied when Soros, Gates, Fink, et al are locked away and die in prison.
Posted by: GOP sux at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (Zzbjj)
Posted by: BignJames
Frito pie.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (JpKTL)
=====
Salad topped with sous vide chicken.
Posted by: Jordan61 at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (DRSnL)
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (JIdXK)
=======
You only noticed because you're racist.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (GBKbO)
Cast Of 'The View' Unanimously Overturns SCOTUS Decision
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (IG4Id)
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:08 PM (GBKbO)
---
Well, the collected Conan chronicles is a pretty hefty tome by itself. You'll build muscles you didn't know you had just by reading it!
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (7fElN)
*tries to develop joke about legal jodhpurs, fails miserably*
Posted by: Archimedes at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (CsUN+)
Your science denying conspiracy theory believing Uncle Frank...
/you are letting us down here Bee
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: PabloD at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (sfZkd)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM
Does jailbait magazine count?
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (4p0Xq)
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (7fElN)
.......
C'mon. Everybody knows it's Swiss.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (v0R5T)
It's Venezuelan Beaver cheese. More of that coming across the border today than fentanyl.
Posted by: Roy at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (z+ik4)
Does jailbait magazine count?
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (4p0Xq)
They hide his latest episode of "Young Tail" in his New York Times paper.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (Zz0t1)
Posted by: Thomas Bender at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (JIdXK)
I sometimes think we get bogged down trying to define reality. We were all there that night. We saw, in real time, them stop and then steal the election.
Any yet, we are told that that never happened and have to argue for what we all saw with our own eyes. Even though the left on numerous occasions have said they did just that.
Posted by: Aetius451AD at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (di6C2)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (N3GIM)
If it was AZ or NV? Then it would be time to break out the Moet et Chandon.
Posted by: mnw at March 04, 2024 01:12 PM (NLIak)
========
It's going to lead to Republicans winning the governor's race, probably affect House races, and potentially even affect Republican primaries against incumbents like Tillis.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (xcrUy)
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:00 PM (7fElN)
.......
C'mon. Everybody knows it's Swiss.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:11 PM (v0R5T)
It's Venezuelan Beaver cheese. More of that coming across the border today than fentanyl.
Posted by: Roy at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (z+ik4)
---------
It's like no cheese I've ever tasted.
Posted by: Wallace at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (DeFcY)
---
We were in mandatory DEI training.
Posted by: FBI Faux Pipe Bomb Department at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (woPEM)
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:13 PM (7fElN)
========
First was Solomon Kane, and now it's Kull of Atlantis!
Three stories. Light reading for now.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (N3GIM)
if so, I would think that would have to be adjudicated in court, with a jury reaching a verdict
or is insurrection something else, according to law, where someone can simply point and howl like Donald Sutherland in Invasion Of The Body Snatchers ?
Posted by: Don Black
=========
It is and requires a federal criminal trial for conviction just like any other federal felony.
Posted by: whig at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (bk5GW)
Posted by: Northernlurker
Cultists feed on rage and fear. And there's a never-ending supply.
Posted by: weft cut-loop at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (IG4Id)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO, Bird Law Expert at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (snyZJ)
What do you think is going to happen when THEY believe the election is stolen?
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples
I hope it's another summer of love, and they burn down a bunch of Blue metro areas. Along with a few justified shootings as they venture into Red areas without Soros DA protection. Send up the Rittenhouse signal!
Posted by: Moron Analyst at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (JCZqz)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (xcrUy)
----
It's their spirit totem that connects them to their dark god...
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at March 04, 2024 01:15 PM (7fElN)
We were in mandatory DEI training.
Posted by: FBI Faux Pipe Bomb Department at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (woPEM)
Emmitt Smith decided to show his ass and jumped all over U of Florida for dumping all their DIE staff according to new law.
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (Zz0t1)
-----------
Except for the New Black Panther dudes intimidating Republicans whenever that was (2012?) ... and Maricopa County Republicans the past three election cycles ... and ... I'm sensing a pattern here.
Posted by: ShainS -- Neo-Dissident (A psychpathocracy, if you can keep it) at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (Y/tiW)
@NickFondacaro
Whoopi claims the current Supreme Court closely resembles the pro-segregationist court she grew up with: "When it was all men voting for all men, we ended up with the grand wizard, we ended up with all kinds of people on the bench."
Whoopi doesn't even know what her point is.
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (NpAcC)
If you talk with true believing leftists over the course of years one of the most fascinating things you'll note is that they'll "evolve" to believe things that they once claimed only a right wing conspiracy theory nutter would ever claim.
As one example, the slippery slope was often brought up in regards to gay marriage and lefties all claimed
No one would ever be forced in any way to participate in a gay marriage
This would lead to the normalization of more extreme fetishs (transexuals? no those people are crazy!)
And of course, they were only talking about adults, no one would want to introduce explicit gay sexual content to kids
And yet...the left now claims all those things are core values and just common sense...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (ibTVg)
-
BUT THE BLACK NAZI!!!
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (Yui9f)
Now? An indisputable, overwhelming Trump victory and they'll burn this place to the ground.
Posted by: Nikki Haley's luxuriously hairy nipples - Alex Jones Was Right at March 04, 2024 01:04 PM (Yui9f)
=======
So...2020?
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:05 PM (GBKbO)
_______
I think it will be much worse. At least in 2020, there was still some semblance of law enforcement and that burning down cities might get you prosecuted and sent a way for a long time. We now know that ain't true. Only a tiny fraction of the 2020 arsonists and violent savages were prosecuted, and even then mostly for wrist-slap offenses. 2024 and 2025 will be more emboldened.
Posted by: Elric Blade at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (iFTx/)
Their terms are acceptable. Burn the cities down.
Posted by: I live just outside Houston. I'll bring marshmallows. at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (Ph95D)
Whoopi claims the current Supreme Court closely resembles the pro-segregationist court she grew up with: "When it was all men voting for all men, we ended up with the grand wizard, we ended up with all kinds of people on the bench."
Whoopi doesn't even know what her point is.
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (NpAcC)
She's against Democrat Robert Byrd?
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (Zz0t1)
Robert Byrd was one of the most powerful Senators in DC but he never made it onto the supreme court
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (xcrUy)
Cocaine and/or meth help.
Posted by: members of the criminally insane media at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (llON8)
Posted by: davidt at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (SYTee)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (N3GIM)
Posted by: Kindltot at March 04, 2024 12:48 PM (D7oie)
======================
When did we meet?
Posted by: President For Life, Barack I at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (1lTYe)
Posted by: spindrift at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (La/vm)
Posted by: whig
---
do trump haters know this
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: torabora at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (OUiUM)
Whoopi doesn't even know what her point is.
Posted by: redridinghood at
I don’t either. What is she trying to say? We had a grand wizard in the Supreme Court? Does she know who Biden cavorted with?
Posted by: Piper at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (ZdaMQ)
Whoopi doesn't even know what her point is.
____
Her point is chaos, riot, assault, destruction and murder if Dems don't get their way.
Posted by: Chuck Martel at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (fs1hN)
LIED to ARE BLACK PRESDENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Mary Clogginstein from Brattleboro,Vt at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (15lwl)
If you listen to their internal conversations they are exhausted but also literally addicted to the media game. These people talk about twitter posting like that homeless guy on the street will talk to you about the wonders of fentanyl...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (xcrUy)
---
That's their job now.
Posted by: Axeman at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (krQz2)
If you listen to their internal conversations they are exhausted but also literally addicted to the media game. These people talk about twitter posting like that homeless guy on the street will talk to you about the wonders of fentanyl...
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (ibTVg)
========
They're paid to do it.
Posted by: TheJamesMadison, raging against the bourgeois with Pasolini at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (GBKbO)
Posted by: Ladyl at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (+4oV5)
she is just an idiot with a very talented & persuasive agent
Posted by: Don Black at March 04, 2024 01:19 PM (oCjPU)
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:16 PM (NpAcC)
.......
and she should fire her hairdresser.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: Unless she was a time traveler, she did not grow up with a segregationist Court. at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (Ph95D)
Posted by: Northernlurker at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (xcrUy)
Why should they be?
They all have enough money that they'll never have to worry about being homeless.
Posted by: XTC at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (UnA8+)
Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (63Dwl)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (Zz0t1)
*******
She's too ignorant to know about Robert Byrd.
The View couldn't handle the truth.
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (NpAcC)
Posted by: Roy
I know ALL ABOUT eating old beaver cheese, and believe me, it's no picnic.
Posted by: Huma Abedin at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (JCZqz)
Posted by: Martin Brody
Need only be a ten x ten room with three walls and a roof. South wall will be a turnstile.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (pUIaK)
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Guess no one there has the interwebs
Posted by: rhennigantx at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (ENQN6)
Whoopi doesn't even know what her point is.
____
Her point is chaos, riot, assault, destruction and murder if Dems don't get their way.
Posted by: Chuck Martel at March 04, 2024 01:18 PM (fs1hN)
______
I just looked it up. Whoopi was born in 1955. The year after Brown.
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (1bNHn)
Posted by: redridinghood at
---
Yep all those wimmen on the court in Jim Crow days!
So close to it.
Posted by: Axeman at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (krQz2)
Posted by: Anna Puma at March 04, 2024 12:57 PM (uKImU)
I sometimes watch Judge Judy reruns which come just before The Spew. This morning I didn't change the channel fast enough and had to see the hideous face of Whoopee. I may need therapy. That woman could be featured in a horror movie.
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 04, 2024 01:22 PM (0Htd1)
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (1bNHn)
---
One thing infants know, is the way the vibe they get from the SCOTUS of their time.
Posted by: Axeman at March 04, 2024 01:22 PM (krQz2)
Posted by: Tom Servo at March 04, 2024 01:10 PM (i9ffA)
And then you get bad apple cops arresting people filming them in public, and corrupt local prosecutors and judges dragging them through the system before they dismiss their cases.
And, delaying FOIA requests and stonewalling body cam video.
Posted by: Deplorable Ian Galt at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (ufFY8)
Posted by: Queef Olberdouche at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (V8he0)
Posted by: Eeyore at March 04, 2024
You cannot argue with her lived experience! Even if your argument contains facts! Sheesh.
Posted by: Piper at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (ZdaMQ)
Posted by: Aetius451AD
---------
This is about me, isn't it?
Posted by: rainmandodo at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (XeU6L)
Posted by: Rev Al Sharpton at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (woPEM)
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:24 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: sidney at March 04, 2024 01:25 PM (Uy/WF)
Posted by: Axeman
It's true! Just like planetary alignments and crystal energy fields affect mood and development, the balance of SCOTUS has a profound developmental effect on fetuses and young children.
Posted by: Marianne Williamson at March 04, 2024 01:25 PM (JCZqz)
Posted by: Oh great, the Beaver's home at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (MkXxR)
They really tipped the balance in this 9-0 decision. /
Posted by: garrett at March 04
If teump wins they will storm the inauguration....and not a one will land in jail.
Posted by: Cuthbert the Witless at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (Ow+08)
That gal is hawt.
Posted by: Queef Olberdouche
I'd hit it.
Posted by: Tony Danza at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (JCZqz)
Posted by: Rev Al Sharpton
It’s electric! Do do do dodo dodo do do.
By the way, that song is not about electricity.
Posted by: Piper at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (ZdaMQ)
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: I'm really looking forward to her obituary. at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (Ph95D)
The Colorado decision would not have changed the outcome of the primary and probably not the general election.
Hope I’m wrong and happy to hear why.
Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at March 04, 2024 01:27 PM (dQfJF)
18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Guess no one there has the interwebs
Posted by: rhennigantx at March 04, 2024 01:21 PM (ENQN6)
1,000 q
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 01:27 PM (5fDan)
.......
I like their cushions. Makes me laugh every time.
Posted by: wth at March 04, 2024 01:27 PM (v0R5T)
Posted by: Queef Olberdouche
I'd hit it.
Posted by: Tony Danza at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (JCZqz)
Step aside, taxi driver.
Posted by: Ted Danson at March 04, 2024 01:28 PM (ufFY8)
Posted by: LASue at March 04, 2024 01:28 PM (uaUQZ)
That gal is hawt.
Posted by: Queef Olberdouche
I'd hit it.
Posted by: Tony Danza at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (JCZqz)
Get in line buddy.
Posted by: Ted danson at March 04, 2024 01:28 PM (Ow+08)
Whoopi is Exhibit A.
Posted by: I'm really looking forward to her obituary. at March 04, 2024 01:26 PM (Ph95D)
The jewish girl?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 04, 2024 01:28 PM (pVWRI)
Posted by: spindrift at March 04, 2024 01:28 PM (La/vm)
Posted by: Sandy Vigilante at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (JWPIL)
Posted by: Maj. Healey at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (eYF7X)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:14 PM (N3GIM)
The same Left :
But not the right to enforce immigration law !!!
Posted by: Burnt Umber at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (MNhXM)
Little known constitutional amendment procedure.
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (N3GIM)
Yes yes they are leftwing ideologues but, imagine the most dour Soviet appartchiks ranting about the plebes to each other over tea in 1955 and...you still don't get how bad it is.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (ibTVg)
Posted by: Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden at March 04, 2024 01:17 PM (Zz0t1)
*******
She's too ignorant to know about Robert Byrd.
The View couldn't handle the truth.
Posted by: redridinghood at March 04, 2024 01:20 PM (NpAcC)
Shrillary and Bidens dear friend, the Grand Wizard
Posted by: LASue at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (uaUQZ)
Posted by: Mr Aspirin Factory, red heifer owner at March 04, 2024 01:29 PM (R4t5M)
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at March 04, 2024 01:31 PM (N3GIM)
1,000 quatloos that Marc Elias and every other Leftist lawyer is writing articles for tomorrow that claim the Constitutional ban on writs of attainder is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Gref at March 04, 2024 01:31 PM (5fDan)
I hope exactly the opposite, for about 10 different reasons. Number 1 is that it would be a distraction which would overwhelm any chance Trump has to pass the major legislation he's campaigning on, i.e., immigration & border reforms. There are 9 OTHER reasons as well.
So... malice toward none & charity for all. Because it's SMART.
I read a fascinating bio of Wyatt Earp, the kind with footnotes, a list of sources & a bibliography at the back. He was only a law enforcement officer for a couple of years of his long life. He described himself as "a dealer in paste board and ivory," i.e., a gambler and casino manager. He was also an entrepreneur who owned several different saloons, with a casino in a side room & a brothel upstairs.
Posted by: mnw at March 04, 2024 01:31 PM (NLIak)
The Colorado decision would not have changed the outcome of the primary and probably not the general election.
Hope I’m wrong and happy to hear why.
Posted by: Jack Squat Bupkis at March 04, 2024 01:27 PM (dQfJF)
You’re acting like Roberts re-wrote Obamacare from the bench (twice!) to keep it law.
Oh wait…
Posted by: DoublySymmetric at March 04, 2024 01:31 PM (YwyqV)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sB-IyCCQAM
Posted by: Meade Lux Lewis, Domestic Terrorist at March 04, 2024 01:31 PM (woPEM)
Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at March 04, 2024 01:32 PM (XeU6L)
There is nothing more tiresome than really stupid people who believe they are really smart. Joy Behar is the worst. She is dumber than a bag of shit but she thinks she is a brilliant observer of politics and culture.
I don't she's even smart enough to comment at DU.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:33 PM (LkLld)
"When it was all men voting for all men, we ended up with the grand wizard, we ended up with all kinds of people on the bench."
And the Allmen brothers.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at March 04, 2024 01:33 PM (63Dwl)
Posted by: 13times at March 04, 2024 01:36 PM (RoJeu)
I don't she's even smart enough to comment at DU.
Posted by: JackStraw at March 04, 2024 01:33 PM (LkLld)
Just...just smart enough not to fall through her ass and choke herself to death.
Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at March 04, 2024 01:38 PM (VwHCD)
The character she portrayed in The Color Purple was the closest Whoppie ever came to being matched to a job.
Posted by: Eromero at March 04, 2024 01:39 PM (o2ZRX)
Good catch. She's either lying or just historically illiterate.
The Warren Court (!!!) was NOT segregationist!
Whoopi really is about the dumbest, ugliest, most obnoxious bint of all time.
Posted by: mnw at March 04, 2024 01:40 PM (NLIak)
Posted by: DoublySymmetric at March 04, 2024 01:40 PM (YwyqV)
This was a 5-3-1 decision that is presented as unanimous for purely political reasons and to cover the partial dissenters.
The two concurrences read more like dissents, accepting the final outcome but disagreeing to a major element of it, namely that only Congress can classify what is disqualifying and the process for carrying out that disqualification. This is major.
Under the main pseudo-concurrence, the three proggie justices clearly want to reserve some authority, either to the federal judiciary or perhaps the executive, to summarily disqualify people from running for or holding federal office for insurrection. They are absolute on this, accusing the majority of the kind of judicial activism that the proggies indulge in, reading things into the text of the Constitution and going beyond the scope of the question at hand.
Barrett's pseudo-concurrence subtly endorses that position, even while appealing to unity and support of the decision as a purely political act. That is possibly more disturbing than the quasi-dissent the proggies issued.
Posted by: Sam at March 04, 2024 01:41 PM (7jMef)
Posted by: m at March 04, 2024 01:46 PM (o3SCB)
Posted by: m at March 04, 2024 02:05 PM (o3SCB)
Perhaps I missed the joke. Naming individuals specifically in a law would constitute a bill of attainder, would it not? The law would have to describe a type of individual or action covered by the statute, rather than naming them.
Otherwise, the CA minimum wage law could have said it applied to everyone except Panera Bread.
Posted by: ameryx at March 04, 2024 02:39 PM (mnNfG)
So...how can you take him off the ballot for a crime he was never convicted of, by anyone? Even the progressive justices couldn't figure that one out.
Posted by: El Mariachi at March 04, 2024 02:44 PM (ARlwA)
The per curiam opinion goes a smidgen further and says only Congress can provide the process by which someone can be DQ'd under Section 3. The liberal trio objected to this, saying that in making that ruling, the Court went beyond what it had to say to decide the case. Under normal circumstances, the liberal trio would be correct, but the Supreme Court is not made up of idiots, and the per curiam authors knew what they were doing.
If someone other than Congress could provide the structure for DQ'ing a candidate, the only someone who could do it would be a federal judge. If the per curiam hadn't said what it said, these deranged anti-Trump folks would likely have filed a new lawsuit in federal court in front of the proverbial Hawaiian judge, who would not only have DQ'd Trump, but would also have entered a national injunction prohibiting any state from putting Trump on the ballot. The PC opinion was necessary to forstall that possibility.
Posted by: Leeotis at March 04, 2024 03:00 PM (QfIbr)
Cool: So i I can determine what you write with rioting.
I watched your confirmation hearings: the lady there was wicked smart: what did you do with her?
Posted by: Fen at March 04, 2024 03:35 PM (ICn6q)
Posted by: huerfano at March 04, 2024 12:19 PM
They wanted it so much they sniffed their own farts. Never believe your own propaganda.
Posted by: Ifotnothing at March 04, 2024 04:01 PM (LTRHw)
Posted by: Tamaa the Drongo Bird at March 04, 2024 04:11 PM (wGqjj)
https://twitter.com/FischerKing64/
status/1764690299887206786
Posted by: KT at March 04, 2024 04:26 PM (rrtZS)
Posted by: Bill at March 04, 2024 07:49 PM (bXvrr)
Processing 0.09, elapsed 0.1034 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0342 seconds, 645 records returned.
Page size 338 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement
Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band
AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection
AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings)
George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer
Democratic Forays into Erotica
New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network
Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes
Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse
Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party"
Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad
Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up
Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry
NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom
Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?"
Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind
All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd
Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran
Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore
Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery
Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile
Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance
Collective Names for Groups of People
John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets
Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle
Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy
Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive"
Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments
John Edwards Campaign Excuses
John Kerry Pick-Up Lines
Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney
Torments in Dog-Hell
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)