Once Again, Media Ignores All Parts of Debate That Favored Trump to Zero In On the Two Parts That Favored Hillary

The "two storylines" that emerged from this debate, as MeAgain Kelly beamed joyously last night, are 1, Trump's aside "Such a nasty woman" and 2, Trump's refusal to say he'd "accept" the results of the election.

As to the first: Trump said this in direct response to a cheap-shot insult -- one that Hillary laughed as she delivered, turning it from a common political attack into an attempt to humiliate through mocking laughter.

Defending her sham Social Security scheme, she said she'd raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for it, then added in a chuckling quip, "I'm sure you'll find ways to avoid paying it, Donald," or something like that.

Apparently there are a lot of women, including lots of women who don't call themselves liberal feminists -- MeAgain Kelly and half of the online female "conservative" commentariat, for starters -- who actually think that a woman is allowed to insult a man to the accompaniment of a witch's mocking cackle and the man is not allowed to say anything more than "I agree with you, Thee of the Superior Sex."

Go fuck yourselves, women (and some men) who think this way. You're not superior and you have no special rights and privileges, and men do not have a special requirement to defer to you in all things.

People who claim these things seem to be trying to vindicate some personal, at-home domestic issue -- "My husband is such a useless cad!" -- through their political agitation.

You have two choices, ladies: You can either compete in the hard world, or you can keep to the soft world. You cannot go out into the hard world, and in fact employ the tactics of the hard world like insult and mockery, and then demand to be treated by the rules of the soft world.

That's not feminism -- that's infantilism. Learn the difference. The only man in the world obligated to treat you like Daddy's Little Girl is your actual Daddy.

As to the claim that Trump is destroying the Republic by refusing to say in advance that he'd "accept" the results of the election -- Hillary Clinton said in 2002 that George W. Bush had been "selected, not elected" and just this week Hillary nodded and clapped and smiled along with a crowd shouting to Al Gore YOU WON! YOU WON! YOU WON!

As Larry O'Connor points out in that piece, much of Gore's subsequent speech on Hillary's behalf strongly implied he'd actually won the election, but not by enough votes that the Supreme Court was chastened from stealing it from him. And Hillary clapped merrily along.

Posted by: Ace at 12:34 PM




Comments

(Jump to bottom of page)

1 yay

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:36 PM (qCMvj)

2 Alt : I Wrote This Headline Last Wednesday.

Posted by: garrett at October 20, 2016 12:36 PM (i3c+H)

3 Trump in Ohio==


" I will accept he results of this great and Historic election---

IF I WIN! "



Epic Media Troll

Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 12:37 PM (zu88C)

4 Morning Ace.
What's your Mood Ring showing today?
Asking for, the whole Horde, prolly.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 12:38 PM (d6TTt)

5 Wait,Al Gore won in 2000?

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 12:38 PM (fA75F)

6 Why so serious?

Three major independent polls show either a tie (LA) or Trump with a small lead (IBD and Rasmussen). The MSM sponsored polls are flawed, and purposefully so. There's a potential for all these polls to undercount Trump because (1) many Trump voters won't pass a Likelihood screen, and (2) Shy Tory Syndrome.

The Electoral Map actually favors Trump. It's much more likely that Hillary wins the popular vote but loses the EC, than the other way around. (Al Gore redux). Trump's strength with non-college whites is hugely relevant in all the battleground states.

My latest personal 538.com EC interactive projection has Trump winning by at least 2.0% with 298 EVs. YMMV.

If Hillary loses, she dies in many ways. So she has to ratchet up the fraud to win, and survive.

The recent O'Keefe videos give a hint at what the Ds are capable of here. It won't be subtle, because the Ds know they need to cheat by big numbers in the cities in states like PA, OH and FL. Expect that in dozens of precincts in these states, Hillary votes will exceed the numbers of registered voters. It'll be res ipsa loquitor, as lawyers say ("it speaks for itself," no need for evidence to prove how it happened).

So either Trump will win with stronger than expected turnout, or Hillary will win by obvious fraud.

Hillary was never going to be a good President. If she makes it to the White House she'll be incapable of handling the festering problems left by Obama.

Developing ...

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 12:38 PM (r1fLd)

7 I was nodding (not in approval) when I read this post. (Hic, sputter, sneeze, squirt.)

Posted by: Hillary! at October 20, 2016 12:38 PM (kfcYC)

8 He should challenge Hillary to concede her electors if there is any vote fraud or attempt to rig the election. Put her on the spot. She can't agree but he can hammer her saying that if Hillary won't promise not to cheat then why should I accept a rigged election?

Posted by: Vanceone at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (qZs6j)

9 F**k the media...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (O2RFr)

10 So is anybody going to ask whether or not Hillary leaked classified info during the debate last night by telling the whole world exactly how long it takes us to nuke somebody?

Posted by: crankytrex at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (WwN4y)

11 As to the first: Trump said this in direct response to a cheap-shot insult -- one that Hillary laughed as she delivered, turning it from a common political attack into an attempt to humiliate through mocking laughter.

someone after the debate was talking to the pinata head kelly (one of the conservative radio show hosts), and he said

is Hillary nasty? Yes
is Hillary a woman? Yes

She's a nasty woman

lol, loved it

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (qCMvj)

12 Yeah but at the risk of enraging every woman here, most women try this tactic all their lives in every situation: You have to treat me by these rules, but live by those. I get the best of both, and none of the bad, or you'll pay.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (39g3+)

13 #3

" I will accept he results of this great and Historic election---

IF I WIN! "



Epic Media Troll
=========

Concur.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (JBggj)

14 "No you're the puppet. You're the puppet."

That was the point that Trump lost the debate. What a childish response.

Say what you want about Hillary, but in no one's reality is she a puppet of Vladimir Putin. What a fucking stupid thing to say. He can't help himself.

Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (mCz8+)

15 I am a woman and to you, Ace, I say 'Amen'. Feminist are not really about empowering anyone, they are more an embarrassment to most rational women.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (a0IVu)

16 Go fuck yourselves, women (and some men) who think this way. You're not superior and you have no special rights and privileges, and men do not have a special requirement to defer to you in all things.

Women are to be championed and revered.

Go Hillary!!

Posted by: Paul Ryan, Treasonous Douchebag at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (zc3Db)

17 Apparently there are a lot of women, including lots of women who don't call themselves liberal feminists -- MeAgain Kelly and half of the online female "conservative" commentariat, for starters -- who actually think that a woman is allowed to insult a man to the accompaniment of a witch's mocking cackle and the man is not allowed to say anything more than "I agree with you, Thee of the Superior Sex."
---

Yes, those women are called "liberals."

As a female, those women make me crazy. Especially the ones that are voting for Queen FAB because she is a woman. Gender is not an appropriate reason to give anyone a job, unless you're hiring for the NFL or the women's olympic swim team.

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (tvyXw)

18

Rush covering nasty woman quote

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (qCMvj)

19 Mortimer:
"3 Trump in Ohio==


" I will accept he results of this great and Historic election---

IF I WIN! "



Epic Media Troll"

#BOOM
#WAR

Posted by: Taqyia2Me at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (QFpXi)

20 TRUMP WILL PUT US ALL IN THE CAMPS!!!

Posted by: The Hysterical Sally Kohn at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (qJhUV)

21 The "two storylines" that emerged from this debate, as MeAgain Kelly beamed joyously last night, are 1, Trump's aside "Such a nasty woman" and 2, Trump's refusal to say he'd "accept" the results of the election.


Rush is all over these points right now. Said that Trump not willing to concede was a great move. Had he agreed to do so, he would have torpedoed himself.

And Oma IS a nasty cvnt.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 20, 2016 12:41 PM (9P3OG)

22 So is anybody going to ask whether or not Hillary leaked classified info during the debate last night by telling the whole world exactly how long it takes us to nuke somebody?

They're all going to pretend it never happened and hope it goes away. She should be in jail just for THAT let alone all the rest.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:41 PM (39g3+)

23 Hillary was never going to be a good President. If she makes it to the White House she'll be incapable of handling the festering problems left by Obama.

Developing ...
Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 12:38 PM (r1fLd)

Oh God, 2000 was bad enough in 2000. Now that Soros has organized all the lefties and added a dash of violence to the mix a contested election would be a clusterfarg of epic proportions.

Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 12:41 PM (RD7QR)

24 Wow Trolls in early...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 12:41 PM (O2RFr)

25 When Trump was dropping the O'Keefe videos, Hillary was giving him the evil eye at first then she switched modes to the Can You Believe The Balls On This Guy fake laugh..

Posted by: Blanco at October 20, 2016 12:41 PM (tGBt6)

26 Off topic

review of a CLFA book on my blog

link in nic


y ademas, chinga la bruja Hilaria

Posted by: Votermom the deplorable @vm on gab at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (Om16U)

27 If Creamer wins the election that's not a victory, that's a theft. Next question?

Posted by: MTF at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (w/exv)

28 The Mass Communications Corporations industry is all in for Hillary.
It's operatives have no Integrity.
We fight against the Establishment.
I don't use the term Fascist lightly, when I descibe them that way.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (d6TTt)

29 Proof the debate was rigged.

https://tinyurl.com/jeuh2sd

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now With More Je Ne Sais Quoi! at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (Nwg0u)

30 >>>Morning Ace.
What's your Mood Ring showing today?
Asking for, the whole Horde, prolly.

can i ask why you're asking? am I grouchy lately?

i guess I feel okay. Got a decent if not great night's sleep. Got some GAINZZZ.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (dciA+)

31 Wait,Al Gore won in 2000?
Posted by: steevy
---------

Maybe. We're still counting ballots.

Posted by: Dade County Election Committee (D) at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (eMnol)

32 Wasn't there something said once about truth being the first victim of war?

This is definitely war we are seeing, despite the lack of actual explosions and such.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (3myMJ)

33 The accepting the results of the election question are as dumb as the GOP nomination pledge questions. I guess it appeals to people, but I could give a rat's ass. Now I may complain after the election and after someone doesn't "accept" it whatever that means, but not now.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (gmeXX)

34 Fuck that witch in particular...... wait (phrasing).

Posted by: USNtakim at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (hMqvx)

35 Can anyone give me the US Code for the statute saying that anyone who takes classified material and makes it insecure is disqualified from office?
The one that Trump cited at the debate, toward the end.

Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (w7KSn)

36 Cranky:

No. No one is, because that was widely known and widely reported.

Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (mCz8+)

37 6 Why so serious?

Three major independent polls show either a tie (LA) or Trump with a small lead (IBD and Rasmussen). The MSM sponsored polls are flawed, and purposefully so. There's a potential for all these polls to undercount Trump because (1) many Trump voters won't pass a Likelihood screen, and (2) Shy Tory Syndrome.

The Electoral Map actually favors Trump. It's much more likely that Hillary wins the popular vote but loses the EC, than the other way around. (Al Gore redux). Trump's strength with non-college whites is hugely relevant in all the battleground states.

My latest personal 538.com EC interactive projection has Trump winning by at least 2.0% with 298 EVs. YMMV.

If Hillary loses, she dies in many ways. So she has to ratchet up the fraud to win, and survive.

The recent O'Keefe videos give a hint at what the Ds are capable of here. It won't be subtle, because the Ds know they need to cheat by big numbers in the cities in states like PA, OH and FL. Expect that in dozens of precincts in these states, Hillary votes will exceed the numbers of registered voters. It'll be res ipsa loquitor, as lawyers say ("it speaks for itself," no need for evidence to prove how it happened).

So either Trump will win with stronger than expected turnout, or Hillary will win by obvious fraud.

Hillary was never going to be a good President. If she makes it to the White House she'll be incapable of handling the festering problems left by Obama.

Developing ...
Posted by: Ignoramus

My understanding is that the quantum of demonstrably fraudulent votes needs to be in excess of the margin of victory. Trump needs to get the lawyers after every bit so as to take it out before his re-election campaign.

Posted by: Dirks Strewn at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (kfcYC)

38 As to the claim that Trump is destroying the Republic by refusing to say in advance that he'd "accept" the results of the election --

Only a fool would blindly accept the results of an election where people weren't required to provide any sort of proof that they were actually who they said they were, were eligible to vote and could only vote once.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (zc3Db)

39 As to the claim that Trump is destroying the Republic by refusing to say
in advance that he'd "accept" the results of the election
---
Of course the demand is that Trump say on live TV that he'll happily accept defeat, and thus join the NeverFight brigade he's campaigned against for a year and a half.

The whole thing is stupid anyway. It certainly isn't about "peaceful transition of power" as drama queen Wallace put it, as *Obama* is the one in power and therefore the one who needs to submit to the outcome of the election.

The most Trump could reasonably do is go to court and bring more attention to the democrats' lawlessness, where he'd be "defeated" by partisan judges. It's not like he can stomp his feet and assume the Presidency if the electoral college results aren't there.

Posted by: Methos at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (3Liv/)

40 I also suspect that most liberal women are "emotional" rather than "rational," which I guess is super if you're a kindergarten teacher. But to be that way 24/7? Yikes.

/yes, I am in the small minority of "thinking women" and I have the MBTI results to prove it!

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (tvyXw)

41 A troll from the past.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (fA75F)

42 That's not feminism -- that's infantilism. Learn the difference.


Please teach me the difference, because I'm not seeing it.

Posted by: Deplorable Jay Guevara at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (SRKgf)

43 MeAgain is within twelve months of dyeing her hair blue, putting gauges in her ears, and getting a Tumblr account.

Posted by: Azathoth at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (kp4rz)

44 This post and its reference makes me shudder at the thought of a Hillary presidency. If that happens, men in this country are going to have to suffer through at least four years of the worst fucking militant feminism ever.


At this point, I say let the militant feminists run the joint. Put their pink boots on the ground in Syria and Iraq. Let the male SWAT team members, the guys on the violent crime squads and gang task forces, sit back and push paper. Let the lady cops get physical. Male firefighters have earned themselves a nice vacation, let the ladies handle things now.


The more Darwin awards those militant feminists win, the better off our society will become.


Posted by: MacGruber at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (C278+)

45 So, here's the question:

If we do go down the revolutionary road, if we do have a Cromwell march into the Long Congress and run everyone out at spear-point, if we do have a Napoleon roll up to the White House in an MRAP and put the executive branch to flight...

Will the media cover it, or will it be necessary to string up the media first?

And if that happens, will Google take down the YouTube videos of the presstitutes hanging from streetlamps?

Posted by: JEM at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (TppKb)

46 Wow Trolls in early...

The OFA scrambles them early when things go poorly for the Democrats. We're losing, get out there STAT!

I posted a list of social media/Reddit/Forum rules and tips yesterday here. They follow a template.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (39g3+)

47 Posted by: Seattle Slough


====


Seattle Troll-

Why would you care what Trump says ?

You seem concerned.

Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (zu88C)

48 And - rapture! - Portland Poo-pond is here on schedule to tell us to disbelieve our lying eyes because Hillary touched the opposite pole and the no-song zone is now a song zone and Donald has to sing the Very Sorry Song.

Welcome to Whose Debate Is It Anyway? where the points are all made up and the sales of uranium don't matter!

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (eXSOZ)

49 >>14
"No you're the puppet. You're the puppet."
Say what you want about Hillary, but in no one's reality is she a
puppet of Vladimir Putin. What a fucking stupid thing to say. He can't
help himself. Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (mCz8+)

I think he was referring to any one of the many Arabic-speaking monarchs who own her. Putin doesn't need her.

Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (Bdeb0)

50 >>>I also suspect that most liberal women are "emotional" rather than "rational," which I guess is super if you're a kindergarten teacher.

present company excepted, but I'm seeing this crap from the Twitter "conservative" gals too.

They seem to like their Feminine Superiority/Female Privilege just as much as a Sally Kohn.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (dciA+)

51 Senora Clinton es una pinche idiota y perra loca.

Posted by: Votermom the deplorable @vm on gab at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (Om16U)

52 can i ask why you're asking? am I grouchy lately?

i guess I feel okay. Got a decent if not great night's sleep. Got some GAINZZZ.
Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:42 PM (dciA+)

Maybe a little.
Tense times for all of us.
I would go ahead and talk more, but I'm just glad to hear you're taking care of yourself.

You do us all a real service.Thank you.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (d6TTt)

53 That's not feminism -- that's infantilism. Learn the difference.

When you do a contrast, you're supposed to offer two different things, not just repeat yourself.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (39g3+)

54 Once Again, Media Ignores All Parts of Debate That Favored Trump to Zero In On the Two Parts That Favored Hillary

A classic case of projection.

Posted by: Sigmund Freud at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (aN/9m)

55 Can anyone give me the US Code for the statute saying that anyone who takes classified material and makes it insecure is disqualified from office?
The one that Trump cited at the debate, toward the end.

Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (w7KSn)


I think his point was that she's a felon who should be sitting in jail.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (zc3Db)

56 Even with the constant 24/7 attacks bu both democrats and the media and the personal insults, Trump is still tied or leading in the two most accurate polls from 2008 and 2012.

That should tell us something.

Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (iONHu)

57 (Don't mind me, just practicing my Espanol to better learn to live in open-borders Estados Unidos)

Posted by: Votermom the deplorable @vm on gab at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (Om16U)

58 I also suspect that most liberal women are "emotional" rather than "rational," which I guess is super if you're a kindergarten teacher.

Again, ducking but that's most women, period. Its a more feminine trait to be more emotional than rational in your analysis.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (39g3+)

59 Al Gore got $100M for an al jazeera channel. Perhaps Bill and Hillary have been trying to catch up.

Posted by: BourbonChicken at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (VdICR)

60 So is anybody going to ask whether or not Hillary leaked classified info during the debate last night by telling the whole world exactly how long it takes us to nuke somebody?
---

I'm very curious about this.

So far, there has been no official statement about her statement. But then again King Putt owns everything and everyone. so Queen FAB could say anything and he has her back.

Hate to say it, but would love it if Russia or ISIS made a comment.

/treasons c0cksuckers.

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (tvyXw)

61 Cunts for Clinton!
Yeah, I said it...

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (qJhUV)

62 When Hillary worked herself into a contrived high dudgeon about how "appalled" she was that Trump was "talking down our democracy," did anyone else immediately recall Eric "Otter" Stratton's "I will not stand by and listen to you bad-mouth the United States of America!" speech from Animal House?

Posted by: Alex at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (7Yy8M)

63 As I said earlier;

There is a whole other side, that is totally different, not just marginally different, totally different, than the story out of the MFM, and that includes Fox.

The MFM will run with 'biting analysis' of a perspective on a story that, on its face, is ridiculous, and then the other outlets pick that same lame BS up and run with it for an entire day. They did that with the bullshit tripe that they were peddling for an entire day about the historical accuracy of polls and the inviolable historical tradition of accepting election results no matter how rigged they are. That's bullshit on its face, but the once respected Brit Hume was peddling that like snake oil all day yesterday.

There is another side of the story. One with videos and audios and emails and pretty damned credible eye witnesses , and that story is not being told except by the "conspiracy theorists' who have viewerships larger than many of the MFM combined.

But we should limit our intake to the 'credible' news sources who are picking what they think we need to know.

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (4ng05)

64 58, Its a more feminine trait to be more emotional than rational in your analysis.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (39g3+)
Hmm. Perhaps so. I'm in engineering. The women I hang out with tend to be very analytical thinkers.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (a0IVu)

65 @12, I think everyone tries to press advantages, and women tend to be more naturally good at manipulating men than men are at manipulation. Like, saying something bitchy and then smiling pretty and being all girl (or crying and demanding comfort). It's a natural advantage, and it's easy to slip into the habit of using it.

It's not mature, honorable, or effective long-term, but the kind of people who would use it aren't probably particularly mature, concerned about honor, or thinking long term.

Posted by: sunny-dee at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (QAOZh)

66 Again, ducking but that's most women, period. Its a more feminine trait to be more emotional than rational in your analysis.

Dang, I should get a DNA test to see if I'm Female.... I over analyze everything,.... and You're a big meanie for saying I'm too emotional....

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (O2RFr)

67

Pussies

Posted by: ThunderB at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (+GOlG)

68 Again, ducking but that's most women, period. Its a more feminine trait to be more emotional than rational in your analysis.
---

Not my analysis.

MBTI personality theory.

Most women are "feelers"
Most men are "thinkers"
Most gay men are "feelers"

No idea about gay women.

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (tvyXw)

69 Pero cojeme si tengo que aprender arabe.

Posted by: Votermom the deplorable @vm on gab at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (Om16U)

70 all megyn kelly could talk about was trump attacking women.....jeez....we are all supposed to be equal right megyn? pulling the woman card? how about he was attacking LIARS.......

Posted by: phoenixgirl, gird up your loins, this is not the time to go wobbly at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (0O7c5)

71 39 As to the claim that Trump is destroying the Republic by refusing to say
in advance that he'd "accept" the results of the election
---
Of course the demand is that Trump say on live TV that he'll happily accept defeat, and thus join the NeverFight brigade he's campaigned against for a year and a half.



Did Wallace ask Her Thighness the same question?

Posted by: Deplorable Jay Guevara at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (SRKgf)

72 "did anyone else immediately recall Eric "Otter" Stratton's "I will not stand by and listen to you bad-mouth the United States of America!" speech from Animal House?"

Yep

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (r1fLd)

73 55
Can anyone give me the US Code for the statute saying that anyone who
takes classified material and makes it insecure is disqualified from
office?

The one that Trump cited at the debate, toward the end.
Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:43 PM (w7KSn)

Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Section 798. "Unauthorized Disclosure."

Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (Bdeb0)

74 "I think his point was that she's a felon who should be sitting in jail."
Got it. I would like to bookmark the actual statute.
Mark Levin did a whole show segment on it.

Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (w7KSn)

75 They're just mad because Algore didn't get his also-ran trophy.

Posted by: Kerry at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (o5YPJ)

76 Morning all.

Whoever it was yesterday that said keep stocking ammo just in case gave good advice.

So in honor of the scum that has overrun this country, 2,125 rounds of .22lr now have a new home.

Thank you Gander Mountain.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 12:49 PM (Idu2i)

77 The only man in the world obligated to treat you like Daddy's Little Girl is your actual Daddy.


Daddy Issues make the feminist world go 'round.

Posted by: pookysgirl at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (ar2KI)

78 Iowahawk summarizes Hillary's debate message:

https://tinyurl.com/j4ucpfz

Posted by: MTF at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (w/exv)

79 #10 Me! Me! Me!

656 I'm also going to ignore that Hillary, who I don't like, gave out the state secret of a 4-minute interval between order given and executing a nuclear strike because Trump and 'nuclear triad'!!!

Posted by: Jerryme at October 20, 2016 12:10 PM (FP3TD)

Posted by: Jerryme at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (FP3TD)

80 One of the interesting things to consider here is that if Trump wins the EC and Hillary "wins" the popular vote we will know that it was fraudulent votes that will put her over the top.

Something like 10% of illegals vote, fortunately mostly in CA. That's 2-4M illegal votes right there. Keep in mind Obama won the popular vote by 5M in 2012 so this is actually a likely scenario.

Were I Trump I would come out with a proposal for capital punishment for intentional electoral fraud - illegals votes, voting in multiple districts, etc.

Make the State Media talk about it.

Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (X7E8f)

81 57 (Don't mind me, just practicing my Espanol to better learn to live in open-borders Estados Unidos)
Posted by: Votermom the deplorable @vm on gab at October 20, 2016 12:46 PM (Om16U)

Yup. Saving my pennies for a copy of Spanish language Rosetta Stone. Might as well be able to communicate in the new Yugoslavia we'll have.

Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (RD7QR)

82 Thanks, Zod.

Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (w7KSn)

83 Hate to say it, but would love it if Russia or ISIS made a comment.

"Thank you for the official confirmation of what we suspected!"
-Vladimir Putin

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (39g3+)

84 "i'm not a potted plant".....dear God....that statement makes chris wallace a hero? boy we have such low standards for some and unreachable standards for others......

Posted by: phoenixgirl, gird up your loins, this is not the time to go wobbly at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (0O7c5)

85 Liberal FB friend linked an article saying something about how Hillary's debate answers or something like that showed why we need more women in politics.

I pointed out that if they'd stop aborting so many girls, they might get a few more.

Posted by: Michael at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (KClXw)

86 F*ck MeAgain.


Yeah, that's the ticket.

Posted by: Tommy Flannigan at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (jPoCB)

87 @58, oh, no, that's a hard no. I know super emotional women, and they tend to vocalize their emotions, but I literally do not know an unemotional man. I know quiet men. Men are just as driven by emotions as women, maybe moreso, but they tend to be quiet or passive-aggressive and so it's not obviously emotional.

One thing my dad told me as a teenager (and it was wise) was that everyone uses emotion to make a decision and then the smart ones find ways to rationalize it.

Posted by: sunny-dee at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (QAOZh)

88 Another casualty this election year: Megyn Kelly's career.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (qJhUV)

89 This is definitely war we are seeing, despite the lack of actual explosions and such.

---
Hey, buddy, this is harder than it looks

Posted by: The Obama/Clinton proxies running ISIS at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (3Liv/)

90 Can anyone give me the US Code for the statute saying that anyone who
takes classified material and makes it insecure is disqualified from
office?

--------------

I don't know what the law actually says and if it says this, but such a law that says unauthorized from office (if that office means President, VP, cabinet, or judge) would be unconstitutional.

I know in this day and age we aren't supposed to care about the Constitution. We just want to make sure toddlers can't get guns.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (gmeXX)

91 14 "No you're the puppet. You're the puppet."

That was the point that Trump lost the debate. What a childish response.

Say what you want about Hillary, but in no one's reality is she a puppet of Vladimir Putin. What a fucking stupid thing to say. He can't help himself.
Posted by: Seattle Slough


How come I get the impression you're an idiot?

Posted by: Colonel Travis at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (NC3V6)

92 I posted this earlier....but it is worth repeating

Trump not agreeing to accept election verdict in advance - horrible.

Al Gore not willing to accept an election result 16 years after the fact - heroic

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (xq8JO)

93 68 Again, ducking but that's most women, period. Its a more feminine trait to be more emotional than rational in your analysis.
---

Not my analysis.

MBTI personality theory.

Most women are "feelers"
Most men are "thinkers"
Most gay men are "feelers"

No idea about gay women.
Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (tvyXw)

Both "feelers" and "lickers".

Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (RD7QR)

94
Say what you want about Hillary, but in no one's reality is she a puppet of Vladimir Putin. What a fucking stupid thing to say. He can't help himself.
Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (mCz8+)


It wasn't Trump who approved the the sale of American uranium mining interest to a company controled by Putin.Love or hate Trump he doesn't come off as the type willing to be a puppet to anyone

Posted by: Deplorable Male Logic at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (lKyWE)

95 If our missiles even work after 8 years of Obama.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (fA75F)

96 It'll be res ipsa loquitor, as lawyers say ("it speaks for itself," no need for evidence to prove how it happened).


My penis does that all the time. I hate it when it does that. *bites lip*

Posted by: Amorous Slick Willie at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (JO9+V)

97 MeAgain is completely transparent in her aganda, which is, MeAgain, and her lust for More.

It's really repulsive.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (d6TTt)

98 all megyn kelly could talk about was trump attacking women.....jeez....we are all supposed to be equal right megyn? pulling the woman card? how about he was attacking LIARS.......
Posted by: phoenixgirl, gird up your loins, this is not the time to go wobbly at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (0O7c5)

MeAgain is becoming a caricature.

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (4ng05)

99

krauthamster

"he was doing great, winning by points, up until the accepting results thing, then he committed suicide"

he's lost credibility
he'll never win that back

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (qCMvj)

100 So not saying you will accept election results is a threat to our democracy now....al franken and al gore couldn't be reached for comment.

Let's just go thru the list of shit that's gotten dropped down the memory hole by the left.

The fact they claimed bush wasnt elected for 8 years
Their prior support for the Iraq war
Calling bush hitler and endorsing violence against him
Conspiracy theories about 911
Conspiracy theories about the Iraq war being for lies
Calling bush the a chimp and the worlds 1 terrorist
The fact Obama ran on cutting the deficit and spending
All the lies to pass Obama care
Racial conspiracy theories about Katrina
Being against gay married until 2011 and now it's bigotry

These people are insane

Posted by: Mr Pink at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (hN73C)

101 I'm looking forward to the media freakout when Trump wins.

Posted by: Kaldar at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (uA8nN)

102 The only man in the world obligated to treat you like Daddy's Little Girl is your actual Daddy.


If you want a boyfriend who does this... that's just creepy.

Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (39g3+)

103 >>>Maybe a little.

can I ask what incident you're thinking of?

I just may be forgetting. I don't remember being cranky for a couple of weeks.But I can be wrong. My memory of daily events isn't terrific. it's really not good. Sad!

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (dciA+)

104 The only man in the world obligated to treat you like Daddy's Little Girl is your actual Daddy.


Daddy Issues make the feminist world go 'round.

------------

They are also the 2nd leading cause of hookups.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (gmeXX)

105 Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (zu88C)

You don't understand, that's Washington State Washbasin's schtick. Always has been, always will be. Without fail, it's some variation on "boy, I sure wish I could be some kind of conservativey conservative, but have you seen the latest? I can't be associated with these guys, ugh! Christianists what hates sciences. Why are you even slumming with these sister-humpers, Ace?"

He/She's like a psycho stalker who can't believe that Ace is really going out with that whore Jessica and can't make up her mind whether to try to shame Jessica in public or whisper rude things at Ace where Jessica can hear.

Of course, what she/he/it tells shmuself is that she/he/it is putting us some knowledge. There is zero chance they're not a colossal wanker in real life - the smuggery pops through the screen in 3d if you squint.

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (eXSOZ)

106 Another casualty this election year: Megyn Kelly's career.

No, It's an enhancement to move to a "real" channel like MSNBC!

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (O2RFr)

107 43
MeAgain is within twelve months of dyeing her hair blue, putting gauges in her ears, and getting a Tumblr account.


Posted by: Azathoth at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (kp4rz)

Hilarious! And so true! I envision her on something like The View spewing run-of-the-mill lefty hate.

Posted by: kathysaysso at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (43OZ6)

108

Democrat party gotv'ers keeps calling my house, but I won't answer. If I tell them I already voted for Trump, my house will probably be fire-bombed.

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (qCMvj)

109 Hillary *IS* a nasty woman.

Didn't bother me one bit, especially since Hillary has been saying nasty things about people publicly her whole career. Just as Bill's bimbos.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (NOIQH)

110 Daddy Issues make the feminist world go 'round.

Posted by: pookysgirl at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (ar2KI)


Daddy issues run the whole left side of the political aisle. Leftists almost all hate their fathers and are looking to take their delusional revenge out on everything that looks like, acts like, or reminds them in any small way of their fathers. That IS Western Leftism, today.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (zc3Db)

111 MeAgain is within twelve months of dyeing her hair blue, putting gauges in her ears, and getting a Tumblr account.


Posted by: Azathoth at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (kp4rz)

Hilarious! And so true! I envision her on something like The View spewing run-of-the-mill lefty hate.
Posted by: kathysaysso at October 20, 2016 12:52 PM (43OZ6)


yup, tabloid trash

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (qCMvj)

112 It's all about the mish...

Posted by: The Duke of Mish at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (vtcmf)

113 I wonder how many times Krauthammer has written off Trump to this point...

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (fA75F)

114 What I'm angry at Tubal about is that I mentioned my GAINZZZ and I didn't even get a courtesy "Tell me about your GAINZZ, chief."

(Just kididng, you know.

But, since you didn't ask -- dropped two and a half pounds in three days. I suspect it's water, of course. but, still. Looks good on my FitBit weight loss chart.)

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (dciA+)

115 I find the modern woman/feminist rather appalling, badmouthing their man and expecting him to just take it. Then he goes off with a younger and/or nicer woman which proves that he is trash.

I am not excusing infidelity but I have sympathy for the less appealing guy who does not have the option to retaliate in that way and is stuck with the harridan.

And that's all these women are, harridans. Exhibit A: Hillary.

I may get fed up with my husband from time to time but I would never dream berating him in public nor would I allow anyone else to badmouth him but that's just me.

Posted by: Decaf at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (8zHLN)

116

Man. I forgot. I love the smell of Old Spice. Weird i know

Posted by: ThunderB at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (+GOlG)

117 Meghan Kelly will be fired from Fox after Election Day. January 1st at the latest.

Posted by: Deplorable Adirondack Patriot at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (4AVeu)

118 Go fuck yourselves, women (and some men) who think this way. You're not superior and you have no special rights and privileges, and men do not have a special requirement to defer to you in all things.

Posted by: Ace at 12:34 PM

Yep.

Posted by: Pepe, The Irredeemable at October 20, 2016 12:54 PM (MB9+R)

119 I had to stop reading some libtard blogs this morning... the whole fucking world is gonna end because Trump wouldn't say he would unconditionally accept any and all outcomes of the election.. chaos has already begun! the system has started to "destabilize" as soon as Trump uttered those words! Our allies are beginning to prepare for the anarchy that will ensue!

Hahahahahaha stupid fucks..

As much as I hate Trump, I sure as hell hope he wins.. just so I can go to the libtard sites and mock them before they ban me.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 20, 2016 12:54 PM (so+oy)

120 I trust IBD.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 12:54 PM (sj3Ax)

121 >>>>There is another side of the story. One with videos and audios and
emails and pretty damned credible eye witnesses , and that story is not
being told except by the "conspiracy theorists' who have viewerships
larger than many of the MFM combined.



But we should limit our intake to the 'credible' news sources who are picking what they think we need to know.
.
.
.
.Well that's what CNN told us to do in regards to the wikileaks emails.

Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 12:54 PM (iONHu)

122 "I'm not going to make a blanket commitment because that just gives your thugs carte blache to cheat. Anybody watching the Veritas Project videos can tell you I'd be a fool to promise that."

So simple.

Posted by: spongeworthy at October 20, 2016 12:54 PM (mrfTe)

123
If we do go down the revolutionary road
***
The current moment is somewhat reminiscent of Marius v Sulla. Only instead of the patricians vs the plebes its the plebes and patricians vs the middle class.

And of course Sulla and Marius were both serious men.

But then again, America gave up all pretense of seriousness when it elected a failed state senator as president and then relected him because of the color of his skin.

Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (X7E8f)

124 This is like the OITNB cast posing with "Vaginas against Trump" t's, and tweeting it out with the comment "This is our f$%^ You to Trump" whining about Trump's "pussy" comment.


Um, you don't get to be offended by someone else's vulgarity after you've led a "F$#@ Trump!" chant outside of Hillary's Broadway fundraiser in a crowd that included kids.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (NOIQH)

125

I dont give a fuck what the DC geldings and their dominatrix think

Posted by: ThunderB at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (+GOlG)

126 Seattle Slough? Jesus, they must have gone all the way down their call tree to the semi-retired ranks for these trolls. Full-court press.

Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (RD7QR)

127 I know someone else mentioned this but Trump not going along with 'sure I'll accept the election results' is forcing the media to talk about it today and therefore allowing Trump and his surrogates to bring up the O'Keefe videos which none of the networks, except for FBN, want to talk about. Its genius, really.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (a0IVu)

128 The vast majority of people when they hear Trump call Hillary a "nasty woman" will nod their heads in agreement.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (fA75F)

129 >>>Defending her sham Social Security scheme, she said she'd raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for it, then added in a chuckling quip, "I'm sure you'll find ways to avoid paying it, Donald," or something like that.


The proper response to that is, "You mean like creating a phony charity to funnel the money through".


Secondly, if a thief sneeringly tells me, "I'll try to steal from you, but I'm sure you'll try to find ways to avoid that". I'd respond "Of course, duh. The shame is on you for being a rapacious locust."

Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (PjWy4)

130 The women (and SJWs) who focus on these kind of common, uncomplicated "issue" of "word choice" instead of looking at the more important issues of trade, tax policy, foreign policy, just want to believe they are involved and have something to say about an important issue, but don't want to do the work to delve into the facts in order to substantively support their opinion.

I know, because I used to be one of them.

Posted by: LASue, the most deplorable at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (wgFcF)

131 12 Yeah but at the risk of enraging every woman here, most women try this tactic all their lives in every situation: You have to treat me by these rules, but live by those. I get the best of both, and none of the bad, or you'll pay.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at October 20, 2016 12:39 PM (39g3+)



Absolutely true. They get to choose which rules, and in which situation.

Back when I was debating a feminist at Berkeley (God help me) who was bitching (hard to believe, I know) that women were paid less per month by annuities.

I pointed out that they lived longer, and the same amount of money spread over a longer time implied less money per unit time. Logical, yes?

It was hopelessly sexist to draw the actuarial distinction, she maintained.

I pointed out that the issue was what was a valid segmentation variable for the actuarial calculations. Is gender one? If no, then men and women should get the same annuity payments, but also pay the same for car insurance.

She spluttered in rage. "But men have more accidents!"

So gender was an appropriate segmentation variable if it benefited women, but not if it worked against them. Got it.

Posted by: Deplorable Jay Guevara at October 20, 2016 12:55 PM (SRKgf)

132 Hate to say it, but would love it if Russia or ISIS made a comment.
---
4 minutes to launch a nuclear strike?

You Americans are so backwards.

I have an app for that, see?

*Aleppo disappears*

Posted by: Vlad "Pooty-Poot" Putin at October 20, 2016 12:56 PM (3Liv/)

133 It's not just women in the media who are insulting men its men themselves. At least I think there are just as many men in advertising as women yet male stereotypes are always negative in ads while women always positive.

Posted by: Decaf at October 20, 2016 12:56 PM (8zHLN)

134 question authority.......who is watching the watchmen? who is vetting the vetters? we are just supposed to sit down and shut up when we have project veritas tapes? we have emails from the campaign? we have payment records to the instigators of violence at trump rallies? we have records of numerous trips to the WHITE HOUSE? but sit down and shut up.....soros vote counting machines? really.......


Posted by: phoenixgirl, gird up your loins, this is not the time to go wobbly at October 20, 2016 12:56 PM (0O7c5)

135 At Hillary's inauguration, I think it would be particularly fitting if she were to say, "In the words of that famous American terrorist, "Guilty as sin and free as a bird." "

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 12:56 PM (4ng05)

136 Daddy Issues make the feminist world go 'round.


Posted by: pookysgirl at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM


Since you went there...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixu8gaFQgQc

You're welcome!

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (bzd8I)

137 >>>Yup. Saving my pennies for a copy of Spanish language Rosetta Stone. Might as well be able to communicate in the new Yugoslavia we'll have.

I would advise you to spend the money on a different course. I like Michel Thomas but if you want a Rosetta-like program, look into Fluenz.

I did not like Rosetta. At all. It's pure rote learning. I don't know how you work, but I like to have to guess and think on the fly. Like I'm playing a game. Rosetta is just pure repeat-this drilling.

Fluenz is more like that but they seem to be more on the ball. Look at their advertising videos.

And I would recommend Michel Thomas over either. (Though I haven't actually used Fluenz.)

Also, Coffee Break Spanish from RadioLingua for a free lesson every day to get you into the groove.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (dciA+)

138 59
Al Gore got $100M for an al jazeera channel. Perhaps Bill and Hillary have been trying to catch up.

Posted by: BourbonChicken at October 20, 2016 12:47 PM (VdICR)

And he wanted it before the end of the year when new tax laws kicked in.

They're all so full of excrement.

Posted by: Tami...Powering through being a depolorable at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (Enq6K)

139 >>>You're not superior and you have no special rights and privileges, and men do not have a special requirement to defer to you in all things.


The one fun thing about the collapse of civilization will be seeing these blind, hypocritical pigs get shiny new Muslim husbands. Some feminists just deserve Muslim husbands.

Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (PjWy4)

140 "She spluttered in rage. "But men have more accidents!"

Men drive more.

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (r1fLd)

141 Leslie Neilsen was in a comedy movie (I forget which) but it was a courtroom scene and everyone of importance was female, the judge, the jurors, the attorneys (some of whom were nursing) during the trial.
Must have been 25 years ago or so.
Prescient.

Posted by: navybrat at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (w7KSn)

142 Daddy issues run the whole left side of the political aisle. Leftists almost all hate their fathers and are looking to take their delusional revenge out on everything that looks like, acts like, or reminds them in any small way of their fathers. That IS Western Leftism, today.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (zc3Db)





Barry: What are you talking about? My daddy and I had a great relationship even after he abandoned me at age 3 and couldn't give a shit whether I lived or died. You're just all a bunch of big LIARS!!!!! *runs off to cry into pillow*

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (493sH)

143 Purely anecdotal. I was working during the debate. After the show was over, the three Hillary people I talked to said that the debate was such a CF that they bailed out before it was over.

Berniebots think Hillary is a nasty woman, too. Perhaps more so. If half of the Bernie people stay home or vote for Jill Stein, then Hillary's campaign goes bust.

Donald Trump knows what he's doing.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (JBggj)

144 2, Trump's refusal to say he'd "accept" the results of the election.

---

The thing I find most interesting about this particular bit of virtue signaling is the inability to comprehend the possibility of "what if he's right?"

Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate? It sure happens pretty often in other places around the world. What exactly makes us categorically different? I seem to remember a lot of talk around year 2000 about the Diebold voting machines and their connection to Dick Cheney, so it seems like the idea, in principle, isn't impossible (or maybe that's me with one of those Mandela Effect false memories).

Heck, let's even ignore the question itself. Let's just say, what if a candidate just believes an election is rigged (maybe it isn't. Maybe he's just mistaken, or paranoid, or whatever). What do the NeverTrumpers say is the appropriate recourse in that situation? I mean, there's got to be a right way to go about this sort of thing, right? So, tell me, what is the appropriate course of action for a person in this situation?

If the answer to the above questions is some combination of "Well, it could just never happen here," and "there isn't one. You just have to trust that the system works" then that exact lack of oversight and blind trust is exactly how you allow the issue to happen.

Posted by: joe, living dangerously at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (KUaJL)

145 You have two choices, ladies: You can either compete in the hard world, or you can keep to the soft world. You cannot go out into the hard world, and in fact employ the tactics of the hard world like insult and mockery, and then demand to be treated by the rules of the soft world.


Bingo. Bango.

When you throw a punch, the other person gets to punch back. This is not rocket surgery. If I don't like getting hit back, then I don't throw a punch. Once I do? Game on.

I will admit that this is a personal pet peeve of mine. When I respond to nasty female passive aggressiveness with actual me level aggressiveness, somehow it's my fault for upsetting the other person. Never you mind that the other person started it and I was taught don't start it but it's been broughten, you finish it. Nope. It's my fault for pointing it out and responding in kind. I have always found that ludicrous.

That is way, way, way, way up there with how I cannot abide those who refuse to accept the consequences of their positions and who attempt to wriggle away from them when called out on it. Your position. Your consequences. If you don't like the consequences, mayhap you should rethink your position.


And, as a reminder, this article sets out how history did not begin on January 20, 2009 and this really isn't the most vicious election ever.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-19/trump-or-no-trump-elections-have-been-stolen

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (mf5HN)

146 Um, you don't get to be offended by someone else's vulgarity after you've led a "F$#@ Trump!" chant outside of Hillary's Broadway fundraiser in a crowd that included kids.

If Trump had just made his grab p#*sy comment to the bass hook borrowed from a Hall and Oates song, he would have had a great rap hit.

Just like Jay-Z.

Seriously, all of these liberals going ballistic over a statement that is mild compared to the bleatings of rap stars they trot out to convince lazy ass kids to get off the couch and go vote for them is idiotic.

Trump has boorish behavior. Knew that before the tape rolled.

But you can't act offended on the one hand and then stand shoulder to shoulder with Jay-Z, Snoop Dog and whoever else on the other hand.

I know, consistency has no place in politics.

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (xq8JO)

147 No idea about gay women.

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (tvyXw)



"Gay women are crack snackers. Triscuits are snack crackers." -- The Fourth Testament of Navin R. Johnson, Gas-Pumper

Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (Bdeb0)

148 Megan Kelly will be replaced by Dana Loesch and her ratings be double that of Kelly.

Posted by: Deplorable Adirondack Patriot at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (4AVeu)

149 WTF hit us 2 minutes and 17 seconds ago!?

Posted by: zombie Aleppo at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (FP3TD)

150 the system has started to "destabilize" as soon as Trump uttered those words!
***
Even if conservative concerns about voter fraud weren't real (and they are and everyone knows they are), if the left is so concerned about the integrity of the elections they should be offering to implement voter ID and regular voter list pruning to make sure that everyone believes the elections are on the up and up.

The only reason to oppose they common sense protections is if you think they will cost you votes...and if you think they will cost you votes you are expecting to benefit from fraud.

So long story short the left sees getting fraudulent votes as more important then the integrity of elections, so they can FOAD when other people complain about porous intentionally broken system.

Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (X7E8f)

151 >>It's not just women in the media who are insulting men its men
themselves. At least I think there are just as many men in advertising
as women yet male stereotypes are always negative in ads while women
always positive.


True, except there's a new exception to that: Dads with daughters are now portrayed well. There are precious few dads with *sons* in ads, just daughters. Because everything is in support of girl power!!

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (NOIQH)

152 Wikileaks dropped more Podesta emails today. I searched on 'Creamer.' Guy was a prolific poster to HuffPoo on just about every Progessive topic you can imagine. A Jack(off) of all trades.

Posted by: Count de Monet at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (JO9+V)

153 Drudge has a photo of Hillary with her mouth wide open...as though she is sucking someone's life essence...*shudder*

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (a0IVu)

154 Hillary repeated boring talking points endlessly and obviously tried to deceive all throughout the debate. But Trump is the asshole, according to the Propaganda Press.

In my book that's on the Press, not Trump.

Posted by: MTF at October 20, 2016 01:00 PM (w/exv)

155
Someone I was talking to speculated that one reason Hillary Bloodclot disappeared a few day before the debate to remove as many wrinkles from her face using expensive cosmetic creams which take a few days to take affect. She notices the difference before during and after the product wears off.

Posted by: YIKES! at October 20, 2016 01:00 PM (yfObW)

156 137 >>>Yup. Saving my pennies for a copy of Spanish language Rosetta Stone. Might as well be able to communicate in the new Yugoslavia we'll have.

I would advise you to spend the money on a different course. I like Michel Thomas but if you want a Rosetta-like program, look into Fluenz.

I did not like Rosetta. At all. It's pure rote learning. I don't know how you work, but I like to have to guess and think on the fly. Like I'm playing a game. Rosetta is just pure repeat-this drilling.

Fluenz is more like that but they seem to be more on the ball. Look at their advertising videos.

And I would recommend Michel Thomas over either. (Though I haven't actually used Fluenz.)

Also, Coffee Break Spanish from RadioLingua for a free lesson every day to get you into the groove.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (dciA+)

Ace, thanks for the advice. I actually don't do well with rote learning so it would be good to get something that makes you think.

Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 01:00 PM (RD7QR)

157 Mortimer,

Since you asked, and only because you asked:

I'm not here because I'm worried.

Let me give you an example. I'm a UW Huskies fan. Born and bred. We recently broke a twelve year losing streak against the Oregon Ducks. After that game was the first time I had ever looked at a game thread of a UW/Oregon game from their perspective.

I visited Fox News.com last night for the same reason. I wouldn't be here if Hillary was losing. I wouldn't care what you all had to say about how bad she looked or sounded. I care what you have to say about your ridiculous candidate because it's interesting. Seeing the spin. The cognitive dissonance. It's fascinating.

i.e. comparing Al Gore disputing an actual disputed election (remember, it came down 500 votes in one state) (a State where Ralph Nader had 97 thousand votes) with hanging Chads and the President's Brother and Katherine Harris, and butterfly ballots and all that and yet, after it was all said and done, even though it was clear they got jobbed, Gore accepted it.

Comparing that with Trump who called for Revolution in 2012?? Trump who's calling foul before a single vote is cast? Who will dispute even if he loses 40 States? What a joke.

As I said, it's interesting.

Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (mCz8+)

158 127 I know someone else mentioned this but Trump not going along with 'sure I'll accept the election results' is forcing the media to talk about it today and therefore allowing Trump and his surrogates to bring up the O'Keefe videos which none of the networks, except for FBN, want to talk about. Its genius, really.

What would have been better is if Trump turned the question on Clinton and said - Are you going to ask your campaign manager to stop asking non-citizens to lie about being a citizen so they can vote? Did the Russians make him type that in an email? Are you going to ask the DNC to stop hiring people to bus in illegal voters?



Posted by: Colonel Travis at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (NC3V6)

159 I would think the Hillary campaign to really save a blockbuster about Trump until just a day before the election, giving Trump no chance to say anything one way or another about it. And the MSM will scream to high heaven with huge headlines just before we go to the poles.

Posted by: Colin at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (9FAf7)

160 The scene:
tubal encounters the boss. He makes a bright, but uncalculated comment, trying to be witty and nuanced.

While quipping, he sits in an office chair, uninvited, spilling bosses coffee on pile of papers.

Scrambling to recover, knocks bosses keyboard on floor, dislodging qwerty keys.

When boss asks, pointedly, " what the FUCK do you want, tubal", tubal goes brain dead, and leaves office, walking face first into glass door.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (d6TTt)

161 Men are just as driven by emotions as women, maybe moreso, but they tend to be quiet or passive-aggressive and so it's not obviously emotional.

Posted by: sunny-dee at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (QAOZh)


Cute ... but untrue. There's a reason why 99.9% of all scientific inventions and discoveries in history have been made by men.

Men and women, in general, think differently.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (zc3Db)

162 Good lord the media must be in full panic....They're running stories about Trump scowling at the debate and His horrid treatment of Hillary by calling her nasty....Oh, And Allread has dragged out another Woman who said Trump touched her boobs as he walked by in 1998 at the US Open... And She was crying in the press conference...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (O2RFr)

163
Oh looky, it's John Limpwood on CNBC to tell us what happened in the debate. Hey Johnny, any word on all of those emails you sent the Clinton campaign?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (493sH)

164 A new thing I noticed in the girl power front.Female remakes of hit songs by men.Notice this in commercials?

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (fA75F)

165 You have two choices, ladies: You can either compete in the hard world, or you can keep to the soft world. You cannot go out into the hard world, and in fact employ the tactics of the hard world like insult and mockery, and then demand to be treated by the rules of the soft world.

That's not feminism -- that's infantilism. Learn the difference. The only man in the world obligated to treat you like Daddy's Little Girl is your actual Daddy.

---


Actually, according to feminists, that IS feminism. If I want to know what Catholics believe, I'm going to look to the Catechism. If I want to know what Marxists believe, I'm going to read Marx. So when I want to know what feminists believe, I'm going to listen to what they say to each other, and what they teach their students in classes on feminism.

Posted by: joe, living dangerously at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (KUaJL)

166 War

Posted by: ThunderB at October 20, 2016 01:02 PM (+GOlG)

167 I'm glad I didn't waste my time watching any of them.
Twitter keeps changing my words, last Night it changed "watching" to " eating" & " about" to "snout!"

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 01:02 PM (sj3Ax)

168 sickening how we are hearing about the peaceful changing of power.....and how trump is thumbing his nose at it if he challenges election results....who has been fueling violent uprisings across this nation with their blm lies? inciting people to actively go out and MURDER police officers? that horrible dem nominee has......

Posted by: phoenixgirl, gird up your loins, this is not the time to go wobbly at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (0O7c5)

169 Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 12:40 PM (mCz8+)

Concern status: noted.

Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (X6fMO)

170 But Mrs. Clinton, what about your Wikileeeeaaaakkksss?

Posted by: Alt-Universe Journos at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (EVi2J)

171 Drudge has a photo of Hillary with her mouth wide open...as though she is sucking someone's life essence...*shudder*
Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM


It's all hands on deck.

Posted by: Madonna at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (r74Oi)

172
I wish someone would run up behind John Limpwood and ask him about his emails to Podesta. Dirty little twat

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (493sH)

173 The hildebeast remained vertical for 90 minutes. That's good enough for the MSM and good enough to declare her the winner. All's right in the world once again.

Posted by: washrivergal at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (CFc5L)

174 In before the Scorpion!

Posted by: Grump928(C) Native Texan and Alabama Alumn, twice as smug as you at October 20, 2016 01:03 PM (0F67M)

175 >>>Ace, thanks for the advice. I actually don't do well with rote learning so it would be good to get something that makes you think.


There are four Michel Thomas CD packages for any language. The ones you want are the middle two. I've heard mixed things about the last one for french, so I assume the last one for other languages is kind of lame.

The two in the middle -- I think they're called "Total Spanish" and then "Perfect Spanish" -- are the good ones.

I've never looked at the first one, the introductory one, but I figure it's not really needed as Total Spanish is going ot serve as an introduction anyway.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 01:04 PM (dciA+)

176 SloughBags, still a douche after all these years.

Posted by: spongeworthy at October 20, 2016 01:04 PM (mrfTe)

177 Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (mf5HN)
=============================

But this is Trump! Trump!

Posted by: Sally Kohn-of-Shame at October 20, 2016 01:04 PM (w/exv)

178 I just hate the fact that Trump couldn't have dropped the Al Gore in 2000 example because it popped into my head almost immediately.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:04 PM (UW0g+)

179 The Left and the Democrat Party will never be held to account for their hypocrisy.

I guess when we lose, we really win because we've maintained the "high road" or some syrupy, flowery, bullshit words to that effect.

Posted by: bicentennialguy at October 20, 2016 01:04 PM (vg8iE)

180
CNBC is getting Mark "Plastic Surgery" Cuban's take on the debate. If his forehead gets any bigger or flatter he'll look like Boris Karloff in Frankenstein

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (493sH)

181 So gender was an appropriate segmentation variable if it benefited women, but not if it worked against them. Got it.



And that is where the time honored classic response of,
"That's fine dear. The adults are talking", comes from.

Posted by: rickb223 at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (CJOtA)

182 YouGov poll says third party voters went Trump +22 after last night.

http://truthfeed.com/breaking-new-poll-that-could-change-everything/30796/

Posted by: illiniwek at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (O2rG1)

183 >>>>Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate? It sure happens
pretty often in other places around the world. What exactly makes us
categorically different?
.
.
.
.The mysterious "they" in any Country wide hacking or fraud attempt would have to corrupt about 5400 separate polling places that are not hooked to the internet and a significant percentage of them still use paper to record votes.


Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (iONHu)

184 #45, when I was in grad school after the Army and somewhat bored, I wrote a few concepts for such operations tailored to various force packages. Combination of lessons learned from the Balkans where I was on one of the cleanup crews and from the Iraqi civil war of 2006 in which I was something of a participant.

Posted by: Colonel Kurtz at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (cMIkI)

185 Yeah I'm a little sick of the duplicity. You want to step up to the plate and really want equal treatment. Get ready. Because this isn't some corrupt erosion and f the Marquis of Queensbury rules.

You punch, we punch back. You want to have an intellectual argument we go where it takes us. You want to mock, and e mock back.

People like MeAgain are frauds. They want to play the woman card when it's convenient then snicker to imply he's a cad.

You know what take your little boy haircut, pack up your dishonest circus and hit the bricks.

This contest is for POTUS, not chair of the PTA baking committee.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (9vY6F)

186 Oh looky, it's John Limpwood on CNBC to tell us what
happened in the debate. Hey Johnny, any word on all of those emails you
sent the Clinton campaign?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (493sH)

=======================
John Harwood hasn't been fired yet?

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (JBggj)

187 Amazing that such a despicable woman, and such a despicable party, can find so many who will follow them.

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (AroJD)

188 Some feminists just deserve Muslim husbands.

I wouldn't wish that on a goat.

Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (8J/Te)

189 As I pointed out in the previous post the "Nasty Woman" blather is easily destroyed with the picture of Hillary checking out Christina Aguilera's boobs. I am a few months younger than Hillary, male, and if there were a picture of me staring at Christina's chest everyone's visceral reaction would be "eeeewe". The reaction of young women to the Hillary picture is "EEEEWE". This makes a good Facebook post. Simple and irrefutable on an emotional level.

"Trump called her nasty for a reason" followed by the picture.


http://tinyurl.com/jk7pom6

Posted by: An Observation at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (IBLOg)

190 I will admit that this is a personal pet peeve of mine. When I respond to nasty female passive aggressiveness with actual me level aggressiveness, somehow it's my fault for upsetting the other person. Never you mind that the other person started it and I was taught don't start it but it's been broughten, you finish it. Nope. It's my fault for pointing it out and responding in kind. I have always found that ludicrous.
---

hahaha.

Welcome to my world.

If I have to confront someone, I try to take it down to the least acceptable level of aggressiveness, and then go below that.

Sigh.

Usually someone who is not me ends up crying.

/I hear it's a blue collar/white collar thing. Blue collar: grab them by the neck to settle a disagreement. White collar: everything must be as smooth as I Can't Believe It's Not Butter.

Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (tvyXw)

191 Good news! Hildabeast is in the Barrel! For reals.

Posted by: rickl the deplorable at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (zoehZ)

192 Ah, our provincial rube is checking in.

Posted by: Grump928(C) Native Texan and Alabama Alumn, twice as smug as you at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (0F67M)

193 Since you went there...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixu8gaFQgQc

You're welcome!


Posted by: RedMindBlueState at October 20, 2016 12:58 PM (bzd8I)

Awesome!

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (Idu2i)

194 As I said in the last thread, undecideds who watched the debates might have zeroed on on completely different things than the MSM wants them to focus on.

What they saw and heard was Hill wanting to get rid of Heller - because Toddlers!!!

Hill weirdly smiling when Trump talked about late term abortions or how women are treated in SA

Trump talking with feeling about the ruined factories and lives due to NAFTA.

That wasn't my initial reaction because I was hoping for Trump to hit harder, bring up stuff I wanted brought up and be more eloquent. So I was a bit disappointed.

But a person who watched without preconceived notions of what he was "supposed" to do might have responded much more positively to him than the media - and I - suppose.

Posted by: Donna and V. (sans ampersands at the present time) at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (u0lmX)

195 http://tinyurl.com/hn3jy4o

Here's Rasmussen with Trump ahead.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (sj3Ax)

196 Only a fool - and this covers most of the professional conservative pundits - think that preemptive surrender is a good tactic.

Posted by: *Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet Exclusive! AoSHQ Barrel Survival and Escape Kits by Acme! at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (hLRSq)

197 Moderator: Mr Trump, will you accept the results of an obviously Creamered election (should that be the result)?

DJT: Fuck you, war.

Posted by: Possible Responses That Appeal at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (w/exv)

198 btw ace, good luck with your GAINZZZ! We're all counting on you.

Posted by: Count de Monet as Dr. Rumack at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (JO9+V)

199 John Harwood hasn't been fired yet?
Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (JBggj)


It is too early for sarcasm.

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (xq8JO)

200 You lied!

Token schadenfreude:

https://tinyurl.com/hut9xoe

Bill Kristol and Morning Joe go at it.

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (4ng05)

201 Your points are well taken Ace.

Illustration: A married couple I know got into a fight outside their house 2 weeks ago. She punched him in the face 3 times and then when her mother in law showed up to intervene, she pushed her to the ground so hard that she was knocked unconscious and had to be taken to the Emergency room with a severe head injury. This woman was arrested and is facing serious felony assault charges.

What is her response? She is on FB constantly fishing for sympathy and how she was driven to this and oh woe is me. Serious bullshit. She is lucky that she didn't kill her MIL in her fit of rage.

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (oiNtH)

202 And, as a reminder, this article sets out how history did not begin on January 20, 2009 and this really isn't the most vicious election ever.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-19/trump-or-no-trump-elections-have-been-stolen
Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 12:59 PM (mf5HN)

Ah, you ain't kiddin'.

Posted by: Zombie Nixon circa 1960 at October 20, 2016 01:07 PM (RD7QR)

203 196
Only a fool - and this covers most of the professional conservative pundits - think that preemptive surrender is a good tactic.

Posted by: *Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet Exclusive! AoSHQ Barrel Survival
and Escape Kits by Acme! at October 20, 2016 01:06 PM (hLRSq)
And Romney, Ryan et. al.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (a0IVu)

204 Now Hillary will get put on ice until election day.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (fA75F)

205 I reviewed the Michel Thomas CDs on the site

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/359685.php

DON'T COMMENT ON OLD THREADS! YOU'LL BE AUTO-BANNED!

The only two drawbacks are 1: His accent is poor. He's not a native spanish speaker. but there are accompanying cds by a native speaker to get the accent right.

2. He focuses on grammar, sentence construction, and conjugation, and almost not at all on vocabulary.

though, again, the accompanying cds have a native speaker teachign you some vocab.

I think his approach is sound, though. You have to know how the language works -- word order, how to make questions, pronoun placement, etc. -- and then that allows you start reading children's books and some news articles, which is where you'll start picking up vocabularly -- through actually seeing it in context, not just memorizing a vocab list. (Whic hI personally don't like doint.)

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (dciA+)

206 "Never Give Up, Never Surrender"!!

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (d6TTt)

207 Ask not what your country can do for you.

Ask about Ace's GAINZZZ

Posted by: Zombie JFK at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (xq8JO)

208 And Hillary, Mr Roarke from Fantasy Island called. He wants his outfit back.

Honestly who dresses like that? It looks like she stole it off the corpse of Colonel Sanders.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (9vY6F)

209
Most people remember when Al Gore tried to steal the election, despite claims to the opposite.

Every state has its own recount rules, Trump has an actual obligation to ask for recounts under those rules.


Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (ODxAs)

210 Now Hillary will get put on ice until election day.

If only.... Oh you don't mean that literally....

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (O2RFr)

211 @59

Al Gore got a gift of broadcast spectrum, aka a payout by friends in high places and then turned around and sold it to the muzzies for a tremendous payday.

It's the democrat way.

Posted by: Kreplach at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (vRI+7)

212 "That's bullshit on its face, but the once respected Brit Hume was peddling that like snake oil all day yesterday."

--------

Britt is really trashing his legacy, he should have stayed in retirement.

Posted by: Decaf at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (8zHLN)

213
.The mysterious "they" in any Country wide hacking or fraud attempt would have to corrupt about 5400 separate polling places that are not hooked to the internet and a significant percentage of them still use paper to record votes.


It doesn't have to be country wide.

Posted by: Deplorable Male Logic at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (lKyWE)

214 Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (mCz8+)
"I just looked at an opponent's side in sports to see how they rationalize things - for the first time!"
"I'm doing the same thing here, except for the 480 other times I've been 'just looking in'. But you can trust me I've never done that for sports for some reason, also I'm just trying to figure you guys out despite all those times"

"Gore got jobbed Kathleen Harris corruption bargle"
"Trump calling foul, how dare he our elections are sacrosanct except for that one time"

I'm curious: what does DuPont Antique White vintage '51 lead paint actually taste like?

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (eXSOZ)

215 i get this crap all the time here in my oh so blue part of Lost Angels...

both from harridans themselves, and from some of the beta males, especially mojados....

oh, you can't talk to her that way, she's a woman...

F you: you wanted "equality", you got it.

now suck it up, 'cause that's how we do things here in the bigs, Meat.

Posted by: redc1c4 at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (LGcdt)

216 But a person who watched without preconceived notions of what he was "supposed" to do might have responded much more positively to him than the media - and I - suppose.

Posted by: Donna and V.


I have absolutely zero doubt that Trump got far more mileage out of the debate than Hillary did.

I do regret he didn't have a better answer for accepting the results, but I honestly think if this is what is going to be talked about, it's likely a net win for Trump as people know the system is rotten and it will attract non-ideological people that want to drain the swamp.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (UW0g+)

217 Ask about Ace's GAINZZZ

Posted by: Zombie JFK at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (xq8JO)


I know, right?

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (d6TTt)

218 if the left is so concerned about the integrity of the elections they should be offering to implement voter ID and regular voter list pruning

Or GPS ignition interlocks keeping every bus in the country in only one precinct for a day.

Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (8J/Te)

219 >>Yeah I'm a little sick of the duplicity. You want to step up to the
plate and really want equal treatment. Get ready. Because this isn't
some corrupt erosion and f the Marquis of Queensbury rules.




It's the feminist two-step:
-- 1st step = Feminist declares she is bravely taking on the patriarchy by saying something inflammatory.

--2nd step = Feminist declares she is the victim or "harassment" by "haters," "misogynists" and worse when they respond; anything short of enthusiastic support for step 1 is a hate crime.

This is Gamer Gate
This is Megyn's tantrum after pushback from Trump in the 1st debate.
This is every person who criticizes Hillary.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (NOIQH)

220 No idea about gay women.
Posted by: shibumi, a deplorable who now just wants to yell at stupid people at October 20, 2016 12:48 PM (tvyXw)

Both "feelers" and "lickers".
Posted by: joncelli, Longbow Afficianado and Phalangist at October 20, 2016 12:51 PM (RD7QR)

Did you hear about the lesbian carpentry company that specializes in fine woodworking? Tongue and Grove Carpentry.

Posted by: Trish Regan Fan Club at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (Mt8T4)

221 204 Now Hillary will get put on ice until election day.
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:08 PM (fA75F)

That's what I was thinking. She doesn't have to make a damn appearance anywhere until they gurney her into the White House on Jan. 20th or so.

Posted by: washrivergal at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (CFc5L)

222 And Hillary, Mr Roarke from Fantasy Island called. He wants his outfit back.

I thought She kind of looked like Dr. Evil... She even has that lazy eyed freak look...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (O2RFr)

223 >>>>Good lord the media must be in full panic....They're running stories
about Trump scowling at the debate and His horrid treatment of Hillary
by calling her nasty....Oh, And Allread has dragged out another Woman
who said Trump touched her boobs as he walked by in 1998 at the US
Open... And She was crying in the press conference...
.
.
.
.I cringe when I hear these stories for two reason. First the left believes that Trump molested them 100% and won't ask them any questions like why did they wait so long.

Second is where the heck have they been? I mean that seriously. Trump is famous and has extremely deep pockets why didn't they say a word when it supposedly happened? There are tons of DA's who would have loved to carve a Trump notch into their belt.

Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (iONHu)

224 Don't worry, MeAgain, I got your back!

Heh.

Posted by: Huncher-in-Chief Bill Clinton at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (hA1V+)

225 I wouldn't wish that on a goat.

Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2016 01:05 PM (8J/Te)
=============================

Goats would be good. Leave us the hell alone.

Posted by: Women of Saudi Arabia at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (w/exv)

226 "Can anyone give me the US Code for the statute saying that anyone who takes classified material and makes it insecure is disqualified from office?"

The qualifications for elected office are found in the US Constitution; qualifications cannot be added through statute.

Posted by: *Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet Exclusive! AoSHQ Barrel Survival and Escape Kits by Acme! at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (hLRSq)

227
CNBC is all aflutter - Trump said today he'll accept the results if he wins.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (493sH)

228 221, That's what I was thinking. She doesn't have to
make a damn appearance anywhere until they gurney her into the White
House on Jan. 20th or so.

Posted by: washrivergal at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (CFc5L)
I think she said she was going to be doing tons of rallies and no more naps (paraphrasing here). I think Breitbart had the exact quote.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (a0IVu)

229 YouGov poll says third party voters went Trump +22 after last night.

that was asked of those who had said they'd vote third party .... overall poll said Hillary won debate, which makes me think it is skewed already. Overall poll had Hillary win 48-44.

Posted by: illiniwek at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (O2rG1)

230 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (qJhUV)

231 I thought She kind of looked like Dr. Evil... She even has that lazy eyed freak look...
Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:10 PM (O2RFr)


She needs a hairless-- no, I just can't.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (d6TTt)

232 I'm ready for a woman President.

Really.

Not this one, mind you, but I'm ready.

And what happens if the dim bulb bimbos insist on THIS one?

Decades before we see another. Just like, the next black dude to be erected will not likely occur in MY lifetime... assuming we continuing doing these erection thingies.

So yeah, let's let Hillory do it, for gurrrrl powherrr. We'll see how that goes.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (TOk1P)

233
"Never Give Up, Never Surrender"!!

Wait...are we doing 80's one hit wonders now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4pg6Jh94Lo

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (ODxAs)

234 Not only did the entirety of the left not accept the outcome of the 2000 election, I would argue that the animus that followed (mostly directed from the left) has led directly to the hostility on all sides now.

Let's just be thankful Twitter wasn't a thing in 2000.

Posted by: Cantankerous at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (326rv)

235 Just watched some of Trump at his rally live now in Delaware Ohio.

He went into great detail, explaining in clear concise words and terms why he answered the question as he did last night.

His strongest statement out of his five minute explanation? "Why would I agree to concede an election three weeks before it occurs and remove the legal options and precedent that has been in place for centuries in our republic, that were designed to protect the VOTER in an election?

His entire statement about last night's question sounds like Ted Cruz helped write it. This is what his campaign manager has said, debates don't allow enough time to expound on points, rather it is the responsibility of the campaign in the time between debates to explain and present the details of the point.

Excellent opening statement by Trump.

Posted by: Jen the original at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (jQe8P)

236 >>Most people remember when Al Gore tried to steal the election, despite claims to the opposite.


And remember what a whiny little turd he was for years afterward.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (NOIQH)

237 Could Bill Kristol be any more of an ass? I'd cancel subscription but I like Stephen Hayes articles.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (sj3Ax)

238 Trump probably brushed by her on the way back to his limo at the US Open."He touched my tit!"

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (fA75F)

239 #227

CNBC is all aflutter - Trump said today he'll accept the results if he wins.
===========

And Free America LOLs !

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (JBggj)

240 Not only did the entirety of the left not accept the outcome of the 2000 election, I would argue that the animus that followed (mostly directed from the left) has led directly to the hostility on all sides now.

------------

The outcome is basically accepted when the Congress certifies the electoral votes, and most certainly is accepted when the new President is sworn in. Why should anyone care what the loser says.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (gmeXX)

241 I think the term the women watching in my house used for her outfit was "ghastly". And lest you believe it was some type of high fashion outfit we rubes simply don't understand- the woman who originated that comment works for a major fashion designer.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (9vY6F)

242 238 Trump probably brushed by her on the way back to his limo at the US Open."He touched my tit!"

Exactly.... And the Woman was crying at the Press conference... Crying for pity sakes...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (O2RFr)

243 present company excepted, but I'm seeing this crap from the Twitter "conservative" gals too.

They seem to like their Feminine Superiority/Female Privilege just as much as a Sally Kohn.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 12:45 PM (dciA+)



Yup.

Look, I'll admit that I do this too. I try not to do it but every single human being on the planet wants to be able to act how s/he wants without having to pay the price. That is human nature.

That being said, speaking in the broadest possible terms, women are more inclined to go the hahaha just joking but not really route and to get the vapors when you call them out on the yeah you weren't joking bit.

It goes back to the old not quite a joke that when men get mad they beat the crap out of each other and then go out for a beer while when women get upset at each other they'll be nice to one another's face and then tease the other into a life long eating disorder.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (mf5HN)

244 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (qJhUV)


2008 and 2012. Barky wasn't eligible and so few had the integrity or courage to even try to force him to prove that he was. Trump did try to make Barky prove his eligibility in 2012 ... never happened, but he tried.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (zc3Db)

245 A woman can do everything a man can do except pick up a check apparently.

Posted by: Lord Sir x at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (nFwvY)

246 Any stories out ther on how Hillary revealed top secret info on our nuclear capabilities? Thought not.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (kTF2Z)

247 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.
Posted by: tu3031




There was an election in past, I believe in the early 1800s, where it was straight up decided by both parties that the results were fraudulent but the losing party basically cut a deal so both sides got something.

I can't remember the details but it's not a conspiracy theory and was accepted by mainstream historians as a fraudulent election.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (UW0g+)

248 And as Jazz Shaw posted at HotGas/NeverTrump, there is no constitutional process by which Trump has to accept the results or concede. Hell, I'm at a loss as to how this horrid "failure to accept the results" has any actual mechanism by which he could impact anything, really.

And as you point out, plenty of Democrats have thrown plenty of shade at the electoral process.

Indeed, if Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any at all.

Posted by: deadrody at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (W15tP)

249 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.


A fair number of historians would point to the election of 1876 between Tilden and Hayes was illegitimate.

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (xq8JO)

250 Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 20, 2016 01:12 PM (ODxAs)

Did not think of that.

Mine was in the "By Grabthar's Hammer, I Shall be Avenged"
boat.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (d6TTt)

251 Oh, And Allread has dragged out another Woman who said Trump touched her boobs as he walked by in 1998 at the US Open... And She was crying in the press conference...

Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:01 PM (O2RFr)





And she waited 18 years to say something about it. Gee poor thing she must have been curled up in a ball unable to live until AllRed came to her rescue

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (493sH)

252 Seriously, what do the mental patients at CNN think Trump will do if he doesn't accept the results of the election?

Raise an army and roll on Washington a la Tiannamen Square?

Secede and create a new Confederacy?

Conduct a coup?

Of course not. He will fight in the courts ,which is WHAT EVERY EFFIN' LIBERAL DOES every day of every month of every year!!!!!!!

It's an absurd discussion that distracts from the disgraceful revelation that Clinton's campaign incited riots and got innocent people hurt.

Posted by: Deplorable Adirondack Patriot at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (4AVeu)

253 43 MeAgain is within twelve months of dyeing her hair blue, putting gauges in her ears, and getting a Tumblr account.
Posted by: Azathoth at October 20, 2016 12:44 PM (kp4rz)


Brilliant. Extra stipend for your account sir.

Oh... and also me -> goth-MeAgain; like a rhino would hit a safari jeep.

Posted by: moronhorde minion at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (hKDRi)

254 Obama now implicated:

https://tinyurl.com/h3a5zkz

But I hear someone said 'pussy'. Could it really be...?

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (4ng05)

255 I think the term the women watching in my house used for her outfit was "ghastly". And lest you believe it was some type of high fashion outfit we rubes simply don't understand- the woman who originated that comment works for a major fashion designer.
Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (9vY6F)
--------------------

Someone here last night, I'm sorry that I can't remember who, described it as Chairman Mao's funereal shroud. Spot on.


Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:15 PM (uHcnA)

256 Test

Posted by: Raquel at October 20, 2016 01:16 PM (Ij9qB)

257 Most people remember when Al Gore tried to steal the election, despite claims to the opposite.


And remember what a whiny little turd he was for years afterward.
Posted by: Lizzy


And Trump's campaign shouldl remind people, Al Gore never "accepted" the results, he just stopped trying after the Supreme Court shut him down.

He still maintains he was robbed.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:16 PM (UW0g+)

258 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.


Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (qJhUV)



I'm still pissed about '24... that's 1824, you damned fools.

Posted by: Zombie John Q. A. at October 20, 2016 01:16 PM (TOk1P)

259 Hillary "paying taxes" when she was actually getting paid by government (taxpayer dollars) in the first place is a non sequitur.

Posted by: Eric Hoffer's Thumb at October 20, 2016 01:16 PM (0J6e7)

260 Gore was in Florida early last week whining with Hillary & supposed to be campaigning w/her.
It was at Free Beacon.

I'll try to find clip.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 01:16 PM (sj3Ax)

261 >>>Look, I'll admit that I do this too. I try not to do it but every single human being on the planet wants to be able to act how s/he wants without having to pay the price. That is human nature.

That being said, speaking in the broadest possible terms, women are more inclined to go the hahaha just joking but not really route and to get the vapors when you call them out on the yeah you weren't joking bit.


....

I think everyone engages in cheap tactics in the heat of the moment, when they're PERSONALLY involved. I know I do too.

But that's different from arguing that these really are "The Rules" in the coolness of quiet contemplation, regarding people who aren't you.

The former is just a human foible. The second is a philosophical commitment to unfairness and a cultish idea that women are just flat-out superior and need to be treated as such.

Posted by: ace at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (dciA+)

262 A fair number of historians would point to the election of 1876 between Tilden and Hayes was illegitimate.

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life


That must be the one I was thinking of

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (UW0g+)

263 >>>>YouGov poll says third party voters went Trump +22 after last night.

that
was asked of those who had said they'd vote third party .... overall
poll said Hillary won debate, which makes me think it is skewed already.
Overall poll had Hillary win 48-44.
.
.
.
.That makes no sense. The math it burns!

Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (iONHu)

264 oh, you can't talk to her that way, she's a woman...

F you: you wanted "equality", you got it.

now suck it up, 'cause that's how we do things here in the bigs, Meat.
Posted by: redc1c4 at October 20, 2016 01:09 PM (LGcdt)

I once got counseled in the Navy for telling a SUBORDINATE Female to 'Carry your own damn toolbox'...

It ended abruptly when I told the Female CPO 'counseling' me 'if that had been a guy, would I be in your office?'

Posted by: Don Q... at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (qf6WZ)

265 #243

It goes back to the old not quite a joke that when men get mad they beat
the crap out of each other and then go out for a beer while when women
get upset at each other they'll be nice to one another's face and then
tease the other into a life long eating disorder.
=================

Or three women having a chat and no one wants to be the first to leave.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (JBggj)

266 I love this idea that I get a call from some apparatchik who says, "Quick, Seattle Slough, get over to Ace of Spades! we need you!"

And yet, on the other hand, I'm an unintelligent, provincial (HA!) rube.

As I said, cognitive dissonance.

Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (mCz8+)

267 Tongue and Grove Carpentry.

Lapboards make better siding.

Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (8J/Te)

268 Ace Johnson is right!

Posted by: Afroman at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (id0ly)

269 Saw MeAgain on another magazine cover at the supermarket Monday.This has done wonders for her career.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (fA75F)

270 Generally, I think Trump won the debate. He didn't slaughter Spill like Debate 2, but he stood toe to toe and got the better of her. He missed some knock out shots, but he also hit on others.

Spill is a shallow liar. Robotic and fake. Can't even fake genuineness unless she's nasty. Always was. If you give her any credibility at this point, I can't help ya. At some point, there's nothing else to say. Trump said what I said - why is she even on the stage? Because the DNC rigged the DNC Primary to give her the spot. Because the DOJ and FBI rigged law to let her escape justice.

That being said, the media's new outrage today is because Trump said he may not accept the elections results, whatever they may end up being. We'll have to see.

And now the Media and GOP are ringing their hands. Christ, these GOPe losers are so f*cking ball-less. They can't WAIT to throw away their greatest political weapons, and start getting weepy when someone else won't comply.

Jesus. F'ing. Christ. I am SO tired of this hand wringing bullshit over trumped up stupidity.

Let me explain how stupid and dishonest this is.

Seven words - Al Gore 2000. Bush selected, not elected.

If that isn't enough, let me elaborate:

Wallace purposefully, deceptively mixed "challenging election results" with "challenging peaceful transition of power". I caught it when he said it.

OBAMA transitions power to the winner, if that is Trump or Hillary. That's because he currently holds the power as President. Obama can do that even if Trump stomps his feet up and down and pitches a bitch fit. Does anyone think Trump is going to lead an armed assault on DC? Get your head out of your ass.

The issue with transition of power is if OBAMA refuses to pass the office. Then you HAVE to take up arms. That has nothing to do with Clinton or Trump. So its not an issue for them.

The question REALLY was "are you going to challenge the election result". Why on God's earth should he say YES when NO ONE KNOWS THE RESULT? Why would you do that when video and email just leaked last week prove that voting has been scammed and defrauded for quite some time?

What if Trump loses by 50 votes? "Oh well, I said I wouldn't challenge it". Then he really looks like a flip flopper idiot. Wallace's goal was to dishonestly commingle the two, and make Trump look like a dangerous usurper.

Did Wallace ask Clinton the same question - "Hill, if Trump wins, will you challenge the results"? Especially since she thinks Russia is tampering with the election? Because we all know the answer to the question - YES, SHE WILL. I'd place bets the pleadings are already drafted ready for execution.

If Trump has said YES, the headlines today would be "Trump walks back election fraud allegations".

If you are going to point out voter fraud, but then say you won't challenge a result, then you have pointed out the fraud for nothing. You have taken your legal right to challenge off the table. Classic GOP 101. Romney-Bush-McCain-Ryan move 100%.

I don't recall Spill saying she would accept the results, but if she did, that's a bald faced lie, because she would have to be INSANE to just let a narrow trump victory slide. That's the biggest proof of her dishonest nature/and or diseased brain, because there is no way in HELL she won't challenge.

And if she did say she won't contest, that should wrap up all her talk of Russia influencing the election then, since she won't challenge the result.

THAT'S why voter fraud continues unabated - will they spend the time and money to prove it, and will it then unseat the winner?

Posted by: SaltyDonnie at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (i6shs)

271 >>Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?


People can't be illegal!

Elections can't be illegitimate!

Posted by: garrett at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (i3c+H)

272 Curious that Clinton wasn't asked the same question, given her side's propensity for having lawyers on deck to challenge close election results on the flimsiest of pretexts. Should Trump win, we all know rioting will be added to the slate of spectator sports for fall 2016. And she will denounce it with as much sincerity as Obama denounced the assassination of five police officers in Dallas.

I have a hard time looking at other Americans as "the enemy," but democrat conduct is bringing me around to their way of thinking on the issue.

Posted by: Sirius the Canine Pundit at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (LBO1U)

273 For those likening the Hillary fauxrage to the Animal House otter speech, DU was quoting the meme years ago.

http://tinyurl.com/hso8lfa

DU= Democratic Underground

Posted by: kallisto at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (nNdYv)

274 247 Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate?

It's probably already happened. Kennedy-Nixon in 1960 comes to mind, amongst others.
Posted by: tu3031




There was an election in past, I believe in the early 1800s, where it was straight up decided by both parties that the results were fraudulent but the losing party basically cut a deal so both sides got something.

I can't remember the details but it's not a conspiracy theory and was accepted by mainstream historians as a fraudulent election.
Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (UW0g+)

You're probably thinking of the 1876 election. Democrat candidate Samuel Tilden won the popular vote, but Hayes won the electoral votes. The Democrats agreed to accept the results in exchange for Federal troops leaving the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1876

Posted by: josephistan at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (7HtZB)

275 There was an election in past, I believe in the early 1800s, where it was straight up decided by both parties that the results were fraudulent but the losing party basically cut a deal so both sides got something.

I can't remember the details but it's not a conspiracy theory and was accepted by mainstream historians as a fraudulent election.
Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (UW0g+)



*points up*

I linked to a Bloomberg article that goes into depth about the various election problems in the past. I think you're referencing the Hayes election which was just flat out games all around. That may be the dirtiest election so far in US history.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (mf5HN)

276 62
When Hillary worked herself into a contrived high dudgeon about how
"appalled" she was that Trump was "talking down our democracy," did
anyone else immediately recall Eric "Otter" Stratton's "I will not stand
by and listen to you bad-mouth the United States of America!" speech
from Animal House?


Alex, I did. My wife asked me why I was humming.

Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 20, 2016 01:19 PM (hKi6n)

277 There was an election in past, I believe in the early 1800s, where it was straight up decided by both parties that the results were fraudulent but the losing party basically cut a deal so both sides got something.

I can't remember the details but it's not a conspiracy theory and was accepted by mainstream historians as a fraudulent election.


That was 1876. Hayes agreed to end the Reconstruction of the South by removing federal troops in exchange for the electoral college votes of Florida which gave him the win.

Also, the election of 1868 had issues because three southern states (Texas, Virginia and Mississippi had not been readmitted to the Union and thus were, in the words of Democrats "disenfranchised".

Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at October 20, 2016 01:19 PM (xq8JO)

278 I remember that women okay-to-insult-men thing got real popular with Sonny Cher. Never watched their show but was forced to watch their live act in Vegas..god I hated how she talked, running down him and his mother, and everyone thought it was so fucking cool. I got in an arg about it years later. Couldn't they see how corrosive it was?

It seemed like male/female comedy was all downhill from there.

Posted by: Jeanne del norte at October 20, 2016 01:19 PM (yh8Re)

279 In 1960 the Ds robbed IL and TX. Nixon would have had to get both reversed, both uphill battles.

The election of 1876 was pretty wild. The Compromise of 1877 gave the election to Hayes who should have lost on the merits, and the Rs agreed to have the feds end Reconstruction in the South.

Art of the Deal?

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 01:19 PM (r1fLd)

280 "Or three women having a chat and no one wants to be the first to leave."

Anybody ever watch the Real Housewives of ..."


Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at October 20, 2016 01:19 PM (J+eG2)

281 There was an election in past, I believe in the early 1800s, where it was straight up decided by both parties that the results were fraudulent but the losing party basically cut a deal so both sides got something.

I can't remember the details but it's not a conspiracy theory and was accepted by mainstream historians as a fraudulent election.
Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:14 PM (UW0g+)

You're probably thinking of the 1876 election. Democrat candidate Samuel Tilden won the popular vote, but Hayes won the electoral votes. The Democrats agreed to accept the results in exchange for Federal troops leaving the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1876

Posted by: josephistan at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (7HtZB)



You people... if I wasn't already dead, my blood would be boiling.

Posted by: Zombie John Q. A. at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (TOk1P)

282 You would think by now liberals would have learned that Trump thrives on crushing all their fake poltical behavioral mores.

How many times in this election has Trump simply ignored their fraudulent etiquette? I've lost count.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (9vY6F)

283 Alright guys, help me out with something. I am so weary of this election, the SJWization of America, and our national politics in general. But I can't help myself, I consume a ridiculous amount of political news every day. And of course it is mostly depressing. And then I feel compelled to try and combat some of the ignorance by posting stuff on Facebook which let's face it mostly just pisses people off - including those in agreement - because they too are weary of all of this.

After the election I need to find some things to completely replace the time, effort, and mental energy I spend on politics. I need to just wash my hands and be done with it. At least for a while. I don't think my constant and compulsive refreshing of my browser tabs in hopes that there is some new news item available to be digested is healthy at all. Really need to quit this cold turkey. After the election of course. So help me think up some stuff to divert myself into - something to binge on rather than politics. (I don't want to ditch the HQ but maybe just come for the non political stuff like the medical monitoring and book thread.)

One thing that will make this hard is that a ton of my political consumption happens during the work day because I have a job that is compatible with that.

Here are some things I am thinking of doing to help shift my time and mental energy away from politics. Some big things and some little, symbolic things.

- Read more books. I have a ton of books that I have bought and not read because I spend too much time reading political stuff online. This is probably the single biggest/easiest way for me to shift brain power away from politics.

- Delete all political sites from my favorites. Symbolic but helpful.

- Throw myself into developing a love for a new sport. Maybe baseball. I have never been able to get into it but have been watching this years playoffs. For most of my life the only sport I have followed closely has been the NFL. Not sure I can develop a true passion for a new sport at this time in my life but maybe I can.

- Only carry my cell phone with me when I really need to have it. That way I can't just be constantly browsing on it. That's probably a good life change regardless.

- Ditch the smart phone and go back to a dumb cell phone. That seems like a radical change but maybe it's time.

- Take my kids on evening outings outside of the neighborhood. Find some local fishing holes and do some soul therapy with a rod and a reel.

- Sign up for a class of some kind. Learn a new language or take a cooking class or something.

- Take up a hobby. I just don't know what it would be though. Politics has been my hobby. I am worried that I won't be able to find something of equal interest to replace it with.

- Delete all my social media accounts. (Not a bad idea anyway.)

- Set up a couple of dedicated but inexpensive weekly gatherings with friends who aren't really political. Thursday night football at the local wing joint and whatnot.


What are some other things I can do to fill the void if I cut politics out of my life? Needs to be things that don't involve spending a crap ton of money like go to the gun range every day. Yeah, would love to do that, but I have kids and kids are pretty spendy so I don't have a lot of loose cash burning a hole in my pocket.

Also, anyone else feeling the same way about this? Anyone else ready to just say the hell with it - time to cut politics out of my life to the greatest extent possible?

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)

284 Saw MeAgain on another magazine cover at the supermarket Monday.This has done wonders for her career.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (fA75F)



How about her ratings?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (493sH)

285 Exactly.... And the Woman was crying at the Press conference... Crying for pity sakes...
Posted by: deplorable donna at October 20, 2016 01:13 PM (O2RFr)

Another actress. When is Gloria going to be disbarred?

Posted by: Jen the original at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (jQe8P)

286 I'm ready for a woman President.

Really.

Not this one, mind you, but I'm ready.


Why does the Democrat machine select crap like Obama and Hillary? I have a theory: so that conservatives will shout "Anyone but them! They are appalling because (x, y, z, all valid reasons having nothing to do with race or gender)".

Then Democrats reply back, "Aha! You hate them because you are racist and sexist!" and thereby energize their base with their speculative ad hominem slander.

It saddens me that they've done so well with such transparent, cheap tricks.

Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (PjWy4)

287 Monitored the enemy broadcast from CBS post-debate. All !!eleventy11!! about Trump accepting the results. Bob Scheiffer posited that Trump might attempt to stage a coup. Yes, he used the word "coup."

Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (hKi6n)

288 yes, I am in the small minority of "thinking women" and I have the MBTI results to prove it!

I seem to recall that Myers-Briggs typology came up on a thread some months ago and a lot of 'ettes turned out to be either INTJs or ENTJs. FWIW, I don't think that "thinking women" are that small a minority. And I also know a number of guys who act like Hillary in making bitchy remarks followed by a guffaw if not a cackle-- some of them are professors at the university downtown.

Posted by: Basement Cat at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (3C9q2)

289 Slough, you're a provincial rube because you speak from ignorance literally all of the time. Urbanity and being in with the in crowd (as you so desperately want to see yourself) are only a cloak for the bitter snotty dunce inside.

A joke about the troll roster is one thing (you're certainly enough of a fool to do this for free), pretending that no paid trolling takes place is... wait for it... ignorance and stupidity.

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (eXSOZ)

290 The former is just a human foible. The second is a philosophical commitment to unfairness and a cultish idea that women are just flat-out superior and need to be treated as such.




The second proves they just can't hang.

Posted by: rickb223 at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (CJOtA)

291 The best way to offset the cost of additional taxes is to simply create a foundation and then bribe foreign governments to donate to it for access to high government officials in your own country Mrs. Canklepotomus.

Posted by: DJT at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (xudgf)

292 Just think: In a few years, we'll all look back on this and say, "Remember when we actually believed that Constitution bullshit! About elections being fair and our votes meaning something? Can't believe we were that naive!"

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (4ng05)

293 But... she IS a nasty woman.

I give it two thumbs up.

Also, her crackpot comment about this being the only election where a foreign power is at work? Silly woman. Ever heard of the McCarthy era? But that time, those crazy commies were on HER side, so we must not discuss it.

I see how this works....

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (cm1Bl)

294 The short term the media gets to hit Trump. Long term Wikileaks and Veritas are confirmed.

Posted by: Iblis at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (9221z)

295 I met Trump once. Can't remember if he touched my boobs though. If there's a few million some fame and a reality show I might remember though.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (9vY6F)

296
"What I really noticed is how very polite DJT and Wallace were until her
grandstanding and overtalking became absolutely ridiculous. It was
almost a mercy a few times to stop her. HRC uses female privilege all the
time and the old-fashioned gentlemen usually give a pass.

Last night was the closest I have seen to stopping that nonsense."

My own take was that Wallace and DJT did pretty well being polite without conceding the floor to 'female privilege'.

Posted by: mustbequantum at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (MIKMs)

297 287 How many divisions does Trump have?

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (fA75F)

298 Lest we forget Al Franken and the half dozen recounts he demanded and got through the courts until enough ballots were created to elect him? Didn't that take something like a month to finally decide?

Posted by: Jen the original at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (jQe8P)

299 [And yet, on the other hand, I'm an unintelligent, provincial (HA!) rube.

As I said, cognitive dissonance.



Perhaps, if both points were made by the same person, Dunderkind.

Posted by: Grump928(c) at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (0F67M)

300 "The one fun thing about the collapse of civilization will be seeing these blind, hypocritical pigs get shiny new Muslim husbands. Some feminists just deserve Muslim husbands."

-------

A lot of prisoners are converting in jail, I wonder how that affects their significant others when they come out.

Posted by: Decaf at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (8zHLN)

301 You people... if I wasn't already dead, my blood would be boiling.

Posted by: Zombie John Q. A. at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (TOk1P)


You're the damned fool! I was the one that waz robbed!! Death has not improved your memory.

Posted by: Zombie Andy Jax at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (TOk1P)

302 it really doesn't matter who the GOP candidate is. It could be Jesus Christ and they crucified him as well

Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at October 20, 2016 01:24 PM (voOPb)

303 The sick part is how quick the NeverTrump Conservatives gave the MSM their whip.

Posted by: Iblis at October 20, 2016 01:24 PM (9221z)

304 269 Saw MeAgain on another magazine cover at the supermarket Monday.This has done wonders for her career.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:18 PM (fA75F)

Magazine covers had better do it because her ratings aren't. The Kelly File has been coming in third behind the other woman and a man, Andi Cooper and Chachi Maddow

Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2016 01:24 PM (Ya7zs)

305 Yup.
The Media and the NeverTrumpers are going to focus on anything negative about Trump rather than anything negative about Hillary.

It's what the enemy does. And what treasonous, cowardly lickspittles do.

Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards at October 20, 2016 01:24 PM (sh70B)

306 And now I have to wonder if you even know what provincial means.

Posted by: Grump928(c) at October 20, 2016 01:25 PM (0F67M)

307 Saw MeAgain on another magazine cover at the supermarket Monday.This has done wonders for her career.

The light bulb is brightest right before it burns out.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:25 PM (qJhUV)

308 Well of course the media is going to tear down Trump. It is what they do.

Posted by: southdakotaboy at October 20, 2016 01:25 PM (JaJ3u)

309 I raised this last night, but with Democrats saying on tape that they are rigging the election, why would he have to say that he would accept the results of a rigged election?

Posted by: Boone at October 20, 2016 01:25 PM (Q9FMg)

310 Monitored the enemy broadcast from CBS post-debate. All !!eleventy11!! about Trump accepting the results. Bob Scheiffer posited that Trump might attempt to stage a coup. Yes, he used the word "coup."

Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 20, 2016 01:21 PM (hKi6n)




Is he going to borrow Cheney's secret Halliburton army?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:25 PM (493sH)

311 >>> I remember that women okay-to-insult-men thing got real popular with Sonny Cher. Never watched their show but was forced to watch their live act in Vegas..god I hated how she talked, running down him and his mother, and everyone thought it was so fucking cool. I got in an arg about it years later. Couldn't they see how corrosive it was?


Too young to remember that, but it sounds like a vestige of chivalry.

It does raise the interesting question, why would "Chazz" switch sides, so to speak, wouldn't she want to be on the winning side? I understand Jenner, but not Chazz.

Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (PjWy4)

312 304 My guess is she splits for a network show soon.Maybe she will co host a show with Mooch.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (fA75F)

313 I doubt Mrs. Cankles has opened a door herself in years.

Remember her line about going to China and telling them that womens rights are human rights? Why in hell would anyone there even give her the time of day?

She really thinks she can have it both ways. But nastiness does not exactly bring out the best in one's minions, does it, Mrs. Witchy-poo.

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (cm1Bl)

314 Bob Scheiffer posited that Trump might attempt to stage a coup. Yes, he used the word "coup."

---------

Did he really?

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (gmeXX)

315 Whether Trump wins or loses, the big loser will be the GOP. Most people in circle are ready to go Independent. They are furious the party isnt doing more to help him and their major donors or supporters in Congress are undermining him.

They're finished.

Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (9vY6F)

316 Hillary's schedule of upcoming events is focused exclusively on PA, FL, OH and NC.

She'll even do a couple herself.

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (r1fLd)

317 Remember her line about going to China and telling them that womens rights are human rights? Why in hell would anyone there even give her the time of day?

-----------

Hillary and China have a lot in common - both are very pro-abortion.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (gmeXX)

318 I understand Jenner, but not Chazz.
Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (PjWy4)

If you do, you are the only one.

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (cm1Bl)

319 I raised this last night, but with Democrats saying on tape that they are rigging the election, why would he have to say that he would accept the results of a rigged election?
Posted by: Boone



Because we're to accept that we have to win elections well past the margin of fraud.

And if we say anything else, we're staging a coup and/or hate black people and don't want them to vote because they can't figure out how to produce a driver's license

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (UW0g+)

320 I'm a little curious as to why there aren't a lot of females commenting on this thread...

Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (VkAIj)

321 "Is it possible for a US election to be illegitimate? It sure happens pretty often in other places around the world."

------


It happened in Austria very recently. The nationalists were leading the greens 52 to 48 yet when the decision was announced the results were reversed. There was such an outcry that they will have a repeat or may already had it.

I'm too lazy to google it for a link.

Posted by: Decaf at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (8zHLN)

322 What are some other things I can do to fill the void if I cut politics out of my life? Needs to be things that don't involve spending a crap ton of money like go to the gun range every day. Yeah, would love to do that, but I have kids and kids are pretty spendy so I don't have a lot of loose cash burning a hole in my pocket.

Also, anyone else feeling the same way about this? Anyone else ready to just say the hell with it - time to cut politics out of my life to the greatest extent possible?
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)



All of those things sound awesome.

And, yes, I agree that remembering that politics is a part of life but only a part is something we (I) should all focus upon.

How about taking up photography? A decent camera isn't that expensive and you can combine going out on expeditions into the surrounding area with taking pictures of it.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (mf5HN)

323 >>It does raise the interesting question, why would "Chazz" switch sides,
so to speak, wouldn't she want to be on the winning side? I understand
Jenner, but not Chazz.


Pretty sure Chaz was sexually abused by a nanny....

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (NOIQH)

324 304 My guess is she splits for a network show soon.Maybe she will co host a show with Mooch.
Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (fA75F)

Theme music being "Ebony and Ivory".

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (d6TTt)

325 It was 1876.

Posted by: Amy Schumer at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (kTF2Z)

326 Referring to Hillary as a "nasty woman" is Donald Trump's way of making common cause with the Bernie wing of the Dem Party.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:28 PM (JBggj)

327 It was 1876.


The canons are the best part.

Posted by: Grump928(c) at October 20, 2016 01:28 PM (0F67M)

328 Saw intro for Anderson Cooper hosting a segment on 60Mins. My take was that he was expanding his reach, but I don't know if he is moving to CBS or just will do specials. Didn't watch the segment, but was just caught by the dissonance.

Posted by: mustbequantum at October 20, 2016 01:28 PM (MIKMs)

329 >>What are some other things I can do to fill the void if I cut politics out of my life?


Sounds like you've already got some good ideas.
One more? Get a doggie!

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:28 PM (NOIQH)

330 325 It was 1876.
Posted by: Amy Schumer at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (kTF2Z)

Amy, you ignorant slut...

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:28 PM (cm1Bl)

331 also the cannons.

Posted by: Grump928(c) at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (0F67M)

332 Texas Zombie... had that discussion with my husband the other day. If she wins, I'm done. Over and out. Que sera and all that shit. They've worn me down to just not giving a shit anymore.

Posted by: deplorable Jewells45 at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (zRZaJ)

333 Hillary's schedule of upcoming events is focused exclusively on PA, FL, OH and NC.

She'll even do a couple herself.
Posted by: Ignoramus




Doesn't sound like someone that's "expanding the electoral map " to me.

I thought via the Washington Post she was going to start focusing on deep red states to give her a bigger mandate.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (UW0g+)

334 316 Hillary's schedule of upcoming events is focused exclusively on PA, FL, OH and NC.

She'll even do a couple herself.
Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (r1fLd)

Now why would she bother doing that? All the MSM articles tell me that she's already won, hand's down.

Posted by: washrivergal at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (CFc5L)

335 Portraying yourselves as the party of poor sports is no way to pick up badly needed votes. Just sayin'

Posted by: Maurice at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (csjq3)

336 CNBC is all aflutter - Trump said today he'll accept the results if he wins.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:11 PM (493sH)

Trump should say that when he wins he's going after the voter fraud anyways.

Make them all freak out.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (Idu2i)

337 Anderson Cooper ... My take was that he was expanding his reach

----------

My advice is to keep your distance.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (gmeXX)

338 Tongue and Groove Carpentry.



Lapboards make better siding.

Posted by: DaveA at October 20, 2016 01:17 PM (8J/Te)

Lap. Tongue. Groove. Boards. Hardwood. *ponders*
Why, that's a joke, son! Sorta convoluted but I like it. Kid's got potential. Get him over, I say get him over to Muldoon to polish him up a little. Now, where's that dog?


Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (JO9+V)

339 The problem is you can take politics out of your life but they wont take their politics out of your life.

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (fA75F)

340 Ah, the Pompatus of love.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (d6TTt)

341 >>I'm a little curious as to why there aren't a lot of females commenting on this thread...


Uh, if you're implying we 'ettes are offended by Ace's take, or side with the Hillary folks offended by Trump's comment, well, you must be new around here.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (NOIQH)

342 OT: I posted this in the mid-morning open thread and I'm posting it again because it is very fascinating and concerns the tactics of the Clintons:

Interesting article. Tom Baurle, a local radio host in Buffalo, was mocked and ridiculed as crazy 3 years ago for claiming he was under surveillance by unknown people. He was recently vindicated because all of what he claimed turned out to be true:

http://canadafreepress.com/article/vindicated-talk-show-radios-true-patriot-tom-bauerle#

Btw, Baurle was the guy back in 2000 who dared to ask Hillary to her face about Vince Foster.

Posted by: Independent George at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (BDZWU)

343 When Trump talked about foreign countries that throw gays of off buildings she got the big-creepy-clown granny face on again.

Are gays in an outrage today about it? Of course not. However, MSN website has dutifully put up an article about toddler gun mishaps rising. On noes....the naughty toddlers are at it again.

Pathetic.

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (oiNtH)

344 So, 1876 was the year Mrs. PIAPS signed her contract with the devil?

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (cm1Bl)

345 Hillary's schedule of upcoming events is focused exclusively on PA, FL, OH and NC.

She'll even do a couple herself.

Posted by: Ignoramus at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (r1fLd)




Is the Beast going to do any public appearances between now and election day? Or will she stay in her cryogenic chamber and have her people/MFM campaign for her?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (493sH)

346 Portraying yourselves as the party of poor sports is no way to pick up badly needed votes. Just sayin'

-------------

Neither is being the doormat.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (gmeXX)

347 Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)

If you've enjoyed watching the NFL, you'll like the NHL

Build models for a hobby. Even if you don't wind up enjoying it as a pastime, you can always huff the paint & glue.

Posted by: josephistan at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (7HtZB)

348 How about taking up photography? A decent camera isn't that expensive and you can combine going out on expeditions into the surrounding area with taking pictures of it.
Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (mf5HN)

That's a great idea. I do enjoy photography and I have a little photo blog that I sometimes but rarely update. Feel free to check it out if you are so inclined. I am actually interested in doing more film photography which is fun but really expensive because it's hard to get developed anymore (https://photeography.wordpress.com/)

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (SUtNI)

349 Are gays in an outrage today about it? Of course not. However, MSN website has dutifully put up an article about toddler gun mishaps rising. On noes....the naughty toddlers are at it again.

Pathetic.
Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (oiNtH)

Those toddlers will be the death of us all.

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (cm1Bl)

350 If I agree that Hillary will totes win NC going away will she STOP PUTTING ADS IN THE MIDDLE OF EVERY DAMN THING OMFG ARRRGGGGHHH.


Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (mf5HN)

351 HA - FOX Business Babe

" Hillary Clinton is telling us that Putin is the Big Bad Wolf. Well if tht's true than I don't want GRANDMA I want the HUNTSMAN with a Big double bladed AXE"

Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (zu88C)

352 Excellent!

Posted by: SuziQ at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (7ig8Q)

353 No, but seriously, I'm not sure why I got it backwards. Yes, the 1824 erection featured some pretty rotten shenanigans, although since nobody got the required majority (there were four candidates), it went to the House to decide.

However, given that Henry "Dice" Clay was the Speaker of the House, as one of the four candidates they sorta made him ineligible, I think.

And this is where I got it backwards. I thought Clay hated Adams, but it was actually Jackson he hated, and since Jackson had the highest vote totals, both poopular and erectoral, it MIGHT have seemed appropriate to eventually get him the votes to be declared the winner.

Clay would not allow that, and threw his support behind Adams instead.

Thus: Our nation's first "stolen" erection. Certainly not the last.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (TOk1P)

354 Mortimer! Did you have that interview yet today?

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (uHcnA)

355 So, 1876 was the year Mrs. PIAPS signed her contract with the devil?
Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (cm1Bl)

Yep. At the Crossroads.
She was sinkin'down.

Posted by: tubal at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (d6TTt)

356 341 >>I'm a little curious as to why there aren't a lot of females commenting on this thread...


Uh, if you're implying we 'ettes are offended by Ace's take, or side with the Hillary folks offended by Trump's comment, well, you must be new around here.
Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (NOIQH)

And, um, which of us are females, exactly, genius?

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (cm1Bl)

357 Thank goodness for those gun laws. Otherwise, there would be a lot of armed toddlers running around.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (gmeXX)

358 However, MSN website has dutifully put up an article about toddler gun mishaps rising. On noes....the naughty toddlers are at it again.

Pathetic.
Posted by: Cheri



That toddler nonsense was so incredibly stupid, if we had a fair media, that should have been the main story.

Or the fact that she supports 9 month abortions.

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (UW0g+)

359 351
HA - FOX Business Babe

" Hillary Clinton is telling us that Putin
is the Big Bad Wolf. Well if tht's true than I don't want GRANDMA I
want the HUNTSMAN with a Big double bladed AXE"



Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (zu88C)
Oh, lol! Which anchor was it? I love FBN.

Posted by: IC at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (a0IVu)

360
Uh, if you're implying we 'ettes are offended by Ace's take, or side with the Hillary folks offended by Trump's comment, well, you must be new around here.
Posted by: Lizzy

*******
Not implying anything of the sort. Just making an observation.

Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (VkAIj)

361 Uh, if you're implying we 'ettes are offended by Ace's take, or side with the Hillary folks offended by Trump's comment, well, you must be new around here.

+1

Posted by: Basement Cat at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (3C9q2)

362 >>>>Hillary's schedule of upcoming events is focused exclusively on PA, FL, OH and NC.



She'll even do a couple herself.
.
.
.
.But according to the msm, liberals and the trolls on here, Trump has no chance in those States and is down in the polls by double digits so she doesn't need to go there.

One thing I have noticed so far this week is that there have been none of the "Trump abandons Ohio, PA, FL, etc." stories. The were hitting pretty regular last week.

Posted by: The Great White Scotsman at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (iONHu)

363 Just heard Obama congratulated Hillary for he sweeping the debates, 3 for 3. Gotta wonder where he gets his choom. (Asking fr a friend.)

Posted by: Ripley at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (1BQGO)

364 how could anyone question the integrity of the vote?

Posted by: President Samuel Tilden (Zombie) at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (oGRue)

365 How many divisions does Trump have?

Posted by: steevy at October 20, 2016 01:23 PM (fA75F)

A lot more than anybody thinks.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (Idu2i)

366 Burt TC . . . .

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (uHcnA)

367 Also, her crackpot comment about this being the only election where a foreign power is at work? Silly woman. Ever heard of the McCarthy era? But that time, those crazy commies were on HER side, so we must not discuss it.

I see how this works....
Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (cm1Bl)

I noticed that comment by her about foreign powers too. Laughably ridiculous. Sadly there a lot of people naive enough to believe it.

Posted by: Reggie1971 at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (DDM7c)

368 It could be Jesus Christ and they crucified him as well
__________________

Isn't it true, Mr. Christ, that you once associated with a prostitute at a well? Have you no regard for family values?

And isn't it true that, Mr. Christ, that you violently disrupted financial affairs in the temple? Have you no regard for small businessmen?

And isn't it true that you turned ordinary water into wine? Have you no regard for alcoholics?

And isn't it true that you disrupted the stoning of a adulterous woman? What are you, soft on crime?

And isn't it true that one of the rabble in your anti-government gang cut off another man's ear? There are too many swords on the street and we need to close the sword show loophole, but you're not the guy to do it.

And isn't it true that none of the people in your "parables" never existed and you have, in fact, fabricated all of these "stories"?

Posted by: Leftist Candidates Against Christ at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (4AVeu)

369 Ace amusingly states,

"You have two choices, ladies: You can either compete in the hard world,
or you can keep to the soft world. You cannot go out into the hard
world, and in fact employ the tactics of the hard world like insult and
mockery, and then demand to be treated by the rules of the soft world."

But - Hillary didn't do that. She didn't demand to be treated by any 'soft rules.' When asked about this specific instance, she stated that she 'just ignored it.' The way a man is supposed to behave when insulted.

The jab was effective because it's true. He's bragged in the past about doing everything he can to dodge taxes. In fact, 95% of her jabs against him were perfectly true, which is why they had such an effect on him.

Posted by: Cyclo at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (wxBnG)

370 Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (mf5HN)

Also in NC, have been working on how to organically emit hate beams to destroy Hillz ads. If I crack the code on that I'll let you know.

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (eXSOZ)

371 I'm a little curious as to why there aren't a lot of females commenting on this thread...

Posted by: T-Squared

Oh, we're here.

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (oiNtH)

372 Walking out the door , bluebell.


I am prepped , caffeinated and ready.



BANZAI!


I'll check back in later.

Posted by: Mortimer, deplorable at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (zu88C)

373 332 Texas Zombie... had that discussion with my husband the other day. If she wins, I'm done. Over and out. Que sera and all that shit. They've worn me down to just not giving a shit anymore.
Posted by: deplorable Jewells45 at October 20, 2016 01:29 PM (zRZaJ)


Yeah. I feel the same. On the one hand quitting the game seems like giving them what they want since their goal is to grind us down. On the other hand, I'm pretty ground down.... The days of being a happy warrior seem long gone for me.

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (SUtNI)

374 "The issue with transition of power is if OBAMA refuses to pass the
office. Then you HAVE to take up arms. That has nothing to do with
Clinton or Trump. So its not an issue for them." SaltyDonnie

Who's you in this scenario? There's been a lot of speculation on this issue, but armed gangs aren't going to show up on the White House steps to forcibly evict him. In the unlikely event he refused to leave office and the various organs of the executive branch followed suit - again highly unlikely - then Congress would have to act. If they refused, then state governors would need to act, probably by calling new elections to replace members of Congress who cooperated. This would effectively be an article V solution on the fly. In any case, the remote possibility of armed conflict would take place between the state and federal governments, not ad hoc militias and the Obama loyalists. Unless you know something the rest of us don't, Americans are simply too responsible, too comfortable and too lazy to do anything like what they did in the Ukraine.

By the way, Texas would win.

Posted by: Sirius the Canine Pundit at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (LBO1U)

375
People can't be illegal!

Elections can't be illegitimate!


I didn't lose the election. The election lost me.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (IqV8l)

376 That's a great idea. I do enjoy photography and I have a little photo blog that I sometimes but rarely update. Feel free to check it out if you are so inclined. I am actually interested in doing more film photography which is fun but really expensive because it's hard to get developed anymore (https://photeography.wordpress.com/)
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (SUtNI)



Ohhhhh *scurries off*

Oh those are nice. Do that more.


I like the angles on the Ferris Wheel pics.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:34 PM (mf5HN)

377 Wow, I thought Bob Scheiffer was no longer with us. Hoped they hosed the formaldahyde off him.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:34 PM (qJhUV)

378 Not implying anything of the sort. Just making an observation.


Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (VkAIj)

Just provide those pics we requested last month and you can say whatever you want.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:34 PM (Idu2i)

379 >>>Did Wallace ask Clinton the same question - "Hill, if Trump wins, will you challenge the results"?


This was a variation on Fox News's old trick of asking the candidates in the GOP debate if each of them will agree to support the eventual winner of the GOP primary.

Fox learned their lesson. In hindsight, I'm sure Fox wishes they had only asked that question of Trump. The point was to get Trump to promise in advance that when he loses (as they assumed he would) he would tell his supporters to vote for Jeb or Marco or Kasich and he would not run third party.

By asking all the candidates, it ended up burning Jeb and Kasich who went back on their word.

So they don't want to put Hillary in that position. If she loses, almost certainly she will litigate and see if she can get a progressive court to give it to her. It's always the ends, not the process, that matters to the Left.

If she loses, her LIV supporters will be convinced that Trump must have somehow engaged in massive voter fraud because the media polling narrative had Hillary solidly ahead. They will never accept the legitimacy of a President Trump.

Posted by: Scalia's Ghost at October 20, 2016 01:34 PM (hA1V+)

380 Good luck, Mortimer!

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (uHcnA)

381 How about taking up photography? A decent camera isn't that expensive and you can combine going out on expeditions into the surrounding area with taking pictures of it.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:27 PM (mf5HN)

Great idea, could even go to the back yard for some awesome pics of nature

http://tinyurl.com/j7ywxbl

Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (Ya7zs)

382 but armed gangs aren't going to show up on the White House steps to forcibly evict him.

------------

But maybe armed toddlers will ... at least until Heller is overturned.

Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (gmeXX)

383 Let me guess the number of MSM pieces that even mentioned the part of the debate that should have had Hillary immediately arrested for divulging super-top-secret information...

Posted by: Jabari at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (VJbsF)

384 I'm getting the feeling that these people are really scared, wonder if they know something we don't?

Maybe internals don't look so good.

Posted by: spypeach at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (nyYhO)

385 Just think: In a few years, we'll all look back on
this and say, "Remember when we actually believed that Constitution
bullshit! About elections being fair and our votes meaning something?
Can't believe we were that naive!"

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 01:22 PM (4ng05)

How can you tell she's the President?
She hasn't got shit all over 'er.

Posted by: Dennis the Peasant at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (JO9+V)

386 #363

Just heard Obama congratulated Hillary for he sweeping the debates, 3
for 3. Gotta wonder where he gets his choom. (Asking fr a friend.)
=================

3 for 3? Maybe. She has a broom big enough to fill the sky.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (JBggj)

387 And, um, which of us are females, exactly, genius?
Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:32 PM (cm1Bl)

Me! Right here!

Posted by: Caitlyn Jenner at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (7HtZB)

388 Posted by: Cyclo at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (wxBnG)
The thread is about the media response and cover for Hillary, not necessarily Herself's mandacity. Perhaps you can work on reading comprehension while you obtenez sus shinebox.

Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (eXSOZ)

389 this is like prostitutes lecturing us about chastity


( not Chastity Bono, btw )

Posted by: Billy Occam at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (/542q)

390 Trump just said he'd accept the results of the election...."If I win." Crowd going wild.

Posted by: Lady in Black - Death to the Man Bun at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (+FSld)

391 Burt TC . . . .



Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (uHcnA)



...You rang?

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (TOk1P)

392 How can you tell she's the President?
She hasn't got shit all over 'er.
Posted by: Dennis the Peasant at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (JO9+V)

Then why does she smell like that?

Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (cm1Bl)

393 China and Russia telephone Hillary to thank her for her masterful debate performance and for the keen nuclear intelligence she was able to provide:

https://tinyurl.com/jr33wlz

Saves on the cost of spies and shit.

Posted by: Mr Macca Bean (Make deplorable adorable again!) at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (4ng05)

394 >>>Also, anyone else feeling the same way about this? Anyone else ready to just say the hell with it - time to cut politics out of my life to the greatest extent possible?
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)


All your ideas are good. I tend to think that pursuits and activities can either be enriching, positive, enhancing or they can be negative, destructive, and draining on other aspects of our lives. I cut out politics every so often or scale back dramatically. I look at how it affects my mood or my outlook or my interactions with others. With kids and a family, I think you've got more important things than politics.

Posted by: Banana Splits Guy at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (WM5ho)

395 One thing I have noticed so far this week is that there have been none of the "Trump abandons Ohio, PA, FL, etc." stories. The were hitting pretty regular last week.
Posted by: The Great White Scotsman




When I hear stuff like that, where exactly is a candidate going to go to if he abandons the states he has to win in order to be President?

Is anyone going to "shore up" safe red states that will mean nothing if he loses?

Posted by: Maritime at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (UW0g+)

396
Just heard Obama congratulated Hillary for he sweeping the debates, 3
for 3. Gotta wonder where he gets his choom. (Asking fr a friend.)
=================

3 for 3? Maybe. She has a broom big enough to fill the sky.
Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (JBggj)

In a way, I think that he would gloat if she loses, because that's the way he rolls. Gloat like crazy.

Posted by: washrivergal at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (CFc5L)

397 Al Gore must have purchased some Calorie Credits to go along w/his Carbon Credits.

Posted by: BignJames at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (9RGU3)

398 Also in NC, have been working on how to organically emit hate beams to destroy Hillz ads. If I crack the code on that I'll let you know.
Posted by: Sporkatus at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (eXSOZ)



Please do so because I heart my teevees and do not want to break one in a rage.

I must question the NRA's ad strategy down here. If it were not for the NRA ads against her, I would have no idea that there was someone running against Burr for the Senate.

Posted by: alexthechick - at least four feet too short at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (mf5HN)

399 "Portraying yourselves as the party of poor sports"

This isn't a game. Trump is executing a spoiling attack.

Posted by: Ok at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (8cftc)

400 348. Texas Zombie. I do film. B&w is cheap to develop - rodinal and fixer are dirt cheap and the process is easy. Scan your negs if you don't have an enlarger.

Easy as that. Film is teh bowmb!

Posted by: Your Decidedly Devious Uncle Palpatine, Still Accepting Harem Applicants at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (PkmrF)

401 trolls like one-word-names as Hillary likes p*ssy


strange attracts strange

Posted by: Billy Occam at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (/542q)

402 .You rang?
Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (TOk1P)
------------------
I'm laughing at your comment at 353, but no one else seems to get it. Did you do that on purpose?

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (uHcnA)

403 Great idea, could even go to the back yard for some awesome pics of nature

http://tinyurl.com/j7ywxbl

Posted by: kbdabear at October 20, 2016 01:35 PM (Ya7zs)

Come on man, I was expecting boobs.

/s

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (Idu2i)

404 Posted by: T-Squared

Oh, we're here.

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (oiNtH)



I think we all know what the "T" stands for.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (TOk1P)

405 Whether Trump wins or loses, the big loser will be the GOP. Most people in circle are ready to go Independent. They are furious the party isnt doing more to help him and their major donors or supporters in Congress are undermining him.

They're finished.


Posted by: Marcus T at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (9vY6F)

We don't really care; we got lotsa big money donors and we'll feast of the crumbs our DEmocratic overloads throw to us.

Posted by: Feckless, Invertebrate GOPe at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (i0ykY)

406 If you've enjoyed watching the NFL, you'll like the NHL

Build models for a hobby. Even if you don't wind up enjoying it as a pastime, you can always huff the paint & glue.
Posted by: josephistan at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (7HtZB)

Huffing glue is probably the best way for all of us to make it through the next few years!

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (SUtNI)

407 >Uh, if you're implying we 'ettes are offended by Ace's take, or side with the Hillary folks offended by Trump's comment, well, you must be new around here.
Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:30 PM (NOIQH)

I'm not offended by his comment, but I do think it was politically stupid.

Posted by: Lea at October 20, 2016 01:39 PM (lIU4e)

408 Just heard Obama congratulated Hillary for he sweeping the debates, 3 for 3.

Well, he never has had a real good grasp of reality.
Oh, and also? He fucking lies.

Posted by: tu3031 at October 20, 2016 01:39 PM (qJhUV)

409 "Just heard Obama congratulated Hillary "

Kiss of doom.

Posted by: Ok at October 20, 2016 01:39 PM (8cftc)

410 You rang?
Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:36 PM (TOk1P)
------------------
I'm laughing at your comment at 353, but no one else seems to get it. Did you do that on purpose?

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (uHcnA)



Oh heck yeah! I sometimes use the language I do, for the main purpose of entertaining myself. If others such as yourself find it funny as well, I am pleased.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (TOk1P)

411 110 Daddy Issues make the feminist world go 'round.

Posted by: pookysgirl at October 20, 2016 12:50 PM (ar2KI)

Daddy issues run the whole left side of the political aisle. Leftists almost all hate their fathers and are looking to take their delusional revenge out on everything that looks like, acts like, or reminds them in any small way of their fathers. That IS Western Leftism, today.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 20, 2016 12:53 PM (zc3Db)
************************
That was Ace's whole bit about taking anything a leftist says and adding ",dad" to the end of it. Once you accept that, all the hypocrisy and contradiction makes sense.

Posted by: Texas99 at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (akHM/)

412 Re: toddlers. Don't forget the other aspect of the equation. There is the Correia article making the point that tens of thousands of crimes, muggings, assaults are foiled every year due to people carrying. You can't justify depriving people of the right to self defense by pulling out an accident involving a toddler.

Posted by: Steve and Cold Bear at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (PjWy4)

413 Also, anyone else feeling the same way about this? Anyone else ready to just say the hell with it - time to cut politics out of my life to the greatest extent possible?
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)

I may even if Trump wins.

I need to generate cash and to focus better on it. Even if Trump wins, he's just a speed bump on the Progressive Police State Highway IMHO.

Trump just gives us more time to prepare. If the SheBeast wins, it's time to go into hiding.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (Idu2i)

414 Those toddlers will be the death of us all.
Posted by: Deplorable, Catholic and irredemable Redneck tcn in AK at October 20, 2016 01:31 PM (cm1Bl)

Haven't you all been treated to the radio ads by our benevolent federal government and the National Safety Council in which sad voiced teenagers talk about a kid getting bullied for so long she found her father's gun and shot herself, and the four year old who found his father's gun and shot himself, and the troubled teen who broke into a car and found a gun and killed people in the store before he killed himself?
All while softly dramatic music is in the background, then the announcer comes on with a stern warning that if you are a gun owner, you have a responsibility to lock up your gun and keep it out of the hands of children and criminals.
Followed by one loud gunshot for emphasis.

Crying out loud, those commercials play every hour here.

Posted by: Jen the original at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (jQe8P)

415 Seeing a lot of claims that Hill gave away a secret last night re the "time to launch" nukes after the order is given.

http://bloom.bg/2c80tLw

Doesn't look like it's a secret given the above link that shows the entire process and times for a launch.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 01:41 PM (3myMJ)

416 Nice to know Barry's got Hillary's back.

While the Russian Navy takes a cruise through the English Channel.

Posted by: mrp at October 20, 2016 01:41 PM (JBggj)

417 "That makes no sense. The math it burns!Posted by: The Great White Scotsman
ha, yeah, I took the first result off twitter ... looked at it more closely and it didn't mean as much. Especially since their 1500 sample thought H won debate 49 to 39. But Trump is looking for more minority vote, probably not playing to the base so much.
Late term abortion not popular at all ... I'd guess that scored well with blacks and Hispanic. need a better poll to tell


Posted by: illiniwek at October 20, 2016 01:42 PM (O2rG1)

418 Trump just gives us more time to prepare. If the SheBeast wins, it's time to go into hiding.
Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:40 PM (Idu2i)




You been reading my blog?

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:42 PM (GUBah)

419 I'm laughing at your comment at 353, but no one else seems to get it. Did you do that on purpose?

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:38 PM (uHcnA)

So Burt is half Oriental?

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:42 PM (Idu2i)

420 Just as I predicted before the hurricaine, Fl Dems are going to court to demand all votes be counted without verifying voter registration so that not a single voter is disenfranchised because they were unable to register due to the hurricaine. And the judge is a TFG appointee, so you know how that will go.

Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (dnWSK)

421 500 error still happening I see.

Posted by: RWC-Team BOHICA at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (/D5Lf)

422 Im glad they're off the pussy grabbing and gone with TRUMP WONT ACCEPT THE ELECTION RESULTS WE"RE ALL GONNA GET KILLED BY WHITE NATIONALISTS!!!11

To me the former was a more effective attack strategy while the latter is too easily debunked simply by name dropping algore and playing O'Keefe's videos 24/7.

Posted by: #NeverHillary at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (bH+An)

423 You been reading my blog?

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:42 PM (GUBah)

No, but that's what I'd be putting on my blog if I was giving it any attention.

I do think I'll check yours out though if that's it in the link.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (Idu2i)

424 Just hit Politico:

https://t.co/GcWKsqmNlW

here's how Podesta got hacked.

Top. Men.

Posted by: Azathoth at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (kp4rz)

425 I'd fuck MeAgain. Would you fuck MeAgain? I'd fuck MeAgain.

Posted by: That crazy guy in Silence of the Lambs at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (bH+An)

426
I think we all know what the "T" stands for.

Posted by: BurtTC

***************
Thanks BurtTC for the shade. I guess all those "Welcome's" I received a couple of weeks ago were real?

Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (VkAIj)

427 Doesn't look like it's a secret given the above link that shows the entire process and times for a launch.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 01:41 PM (3myMJ)





There's a difference between the media publishing what amounts to educated speculation and someone with a clearance confirming it. Especially where the law is concerned. Unless you're Hillary! of course.

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (GUBah)

428 So Burt is half Oriental?

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:42 PM (Idu2i)



Hey, don't get slanty-eyed with me!!


At least she didn't accuse me of doing it on porpoise. That would be disgusting.


I hate the water.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (TOk1P)

429 Fl Dems are going to court to demand all votes be counted without verifying voter registration so that not a single voter is disenfranchised because they were unable to register due to the hurricaine. And the judge is a TFG appointee, so you know how that will go.
Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (dnWSK)

They were given an extra week to register. You cannot throw out statutes that require registration to vote because of a frickin hurricane.

And will the RNC bother to send a first year lawyer down there to fight this?

Posted by: Jen the original at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (jQe8P)

430 >>322
What are some other things I can do to fill the void if I cut
politics out of my life? anyone else feeling the same way about this? Anyone else ready
to just say the hell with it - time to cut politics out of my life to
the greatest extent possible?
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:20 PM (SUtNI)


Yep, I know exactly what you're talking about, and I think I've found a solution for myself that gratifies an interest in history, is hands-on, requires concentration, is somewhat long-term, and seems like a Zen place. Model ship building, by subscription.

You basically pay $100/month (more or less), you get a delivery of parts and instructions, and over the course of a year, you construct a really intricately detailed model of an 18th-century warship. Lots of interaction via hobbyists on the seller's site, etc. I'm thinking about doing HMS Victory, which I'm told is ambitious for a newcomer, but what the heck. Downsides: requires space to construct (and to leave an incomplete project undisturbed), a place to put the sizeable thing once it's done.

Have never tried it. Laying the keel January 2017...

http://tinyurl.com/z7mqvg3



Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (Bdeb0)

431 Look! Up in the sky! The Wicked Witch of D.C. is on her broom, writing something . . .


S U R R E N D E R

D O N A L D

Posted by: The Scarecrow at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (JO9+V)

432 (XzRw1)

What a pathetic loser. It's kind of embarrassing to watch.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 01:46 PM (3myMJ)

433 All your ideas are good. I tend to think that pursuits and activities can either be enriching, positive, enhancing or they can be negative, destructive, and draining on other aspects of our lives. I cut out politics every so often or scale back dramatically. I look at how it affects my mood or my outlook or my interactions with others. With kids and a family, I think you've got more important things than politics.
Posted by: Banana Splits Guy at October 20, 2016 01:37 PM (WM5ho)

Totally agree. I think this is going to be hard - maybe on the order of quitting smoking or something. I have noticed that it really has become a compulsion for me. If I am sitting somewhere without my phone and I can't pull up a browser I start jonsing for it. When I'm stopped at a traffic light and I know it's going to be a couple minutes before I get a green light, I pull out the phone and start refreshing browser tabs. It's totally unhealthy and yet I do it compulsively. Gotta stop.

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:46 PM (SUtNI)

434 Would you like an anecdote? I was at the farmer's market in my lib area today, and as always, the Dems and Repubs both had tables set up. I always smile and nod hello to everyone, because I'm a nice person.

Today for the first time, I stopped by the Repub table on the way out to say hello and ask if they thought we had a prayer. The lady was talking to one of the farmers, a young man probably in his late 20s/early 30s. He told me that he thinks there are a lot of people like him - never voted before, but who are fed up and don't want Hillary - that will be voting for Trump. I told him to be sure to tell his buddies to go vote for Trump too.

It was nice to hear. Given that I live in Libville, I take every small victory that comes my way.

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (uHcnA)

435 >>But - Hillary didn't do that. She didn't demand to be treated by any
'soft rules.' When asked about this specific instance, she stated that
she 'just ignored it.' The way a man is supposed to behave when
insulted.


First, women like Hillary know that they have the media and other who will be offended on her behalf and make it a big deal. The MSM has been doing this for her and other Dems while happily ignoring things like Ann Coulter being called a c#nt a bunch of times (and Ann didn't whine about it).

Second, let's see if she complains about it soon. Recall that after the 2nd debate Hillary went on the Ellen show and whined about creepy Trump stalking her on the debate stage. This is a classic move where the female victim doesn't confront the person so that they can respond, instead they whine to a 3rd party (like MeAgain whining about O'Reilly not publicly supporting her in her feud w/Trump after she moderated the GOP debate).

Posted by: Lizzy at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (NOIQH)

436 _Posted by: The Scarecrow at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (JO9+V)_

MSM : Flying Monkeys
Dorothy throwing water on the Witch: The Donald

Posted by: kallisto at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (nNdYv)

437 I guess all those "Welcome's" I received a couple of weeks ago were real?


Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (VkAIj)

Of course they were.

Now quit ignoring me.

: )

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (Idu2i)

438 428 I'd fuck MeAgain. Would you fuck MeAgain? I'd fuck MeAgain.
Posted by: That crazy guy in Silence of the Lambs at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (bH+An)


I don't remember fucking you the first time. How drunk was I? Or did you roofie me?

Posted by: Cat Ass Trophy at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (dnWSK)

439 'turning it from a common political attack into an attempt to humiliate through mocking laughter.' Ace

Ace, this is a common tactic when Libs start losing arguments on well...actual facts and knowledge. my wife and I were the target of this kind of shit in North MN where she comes from. Its a politics circle jerk Incestuous really.

They will gang up and shout you down and if that doesn't work and you hold your ground then the use the mocking. it really really pisses me off. I wont even engage those douches.

Posted by: Cannibal Bob, 'Hobo, the other white meat' at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (mBYZv)

440 Two things that I was disappointed that Trump didn't respond with:

Hacked emails - Gee Hillary, how did you set yourself up to get hacked in the first place?

Trump as womanizer: All fiction and if you want to talk about a man that abuses women, do you want to get into a discussion of how your husband has treated women for decades and how you have not only enabled his behavior but gone on the attack of these women yourself? Do you really want to have that conversation?

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:47 PM (oiNtH)

441 These women will learn a lot when they get a little more Islam in their lives...

Posted by: William Eaton at October 20, 2016 01:48 PM (MuTTO)

442 I do think I'll check yours out though if that's it in the link.
Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:43 PM (Idu2i)




This thread is getting amusing. Yes, link in nick. And I'm actually half Oriental.



Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:48 PM (GUBah)

443 Thanks BurtTC for the shade. I guess all those "Welcome's" I received a couple of weeks ago were real?

Posted by: T-Squared at October 20, 2016 01:44 PM (VkAIj)


What in sam hill are you talking about?


You threw out a snide, cryptic accusation, and then acted like you were innocent.


Where the label or don't.

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:49 PM (TOk1P)

444 Just got an trending news alert on my phone from CNN, "Donald Trump and the art of bullsh*t".

And no, I don't subscribe to CNN, so I have no idea why I got that alert.

So, basically, a Hillary campaign ad delivered for free to smartphone users.

Posted by: OCBill at October 20, 2016 01:49 PM (df+Zi)

445 "they had such an effect on him"

Her words gave him an opening. Trump said things to influence groups to vote for him. The nice guy or nice girl vote can be up for grabs but Trump wants the voters who fart and cuss and call a spade a spade. Pretending that Hillary isn't a POS would demoralize them. Trump said Hillary stinks because it is true and will motivate voters he is wooing.

Posted by: Ok at October 20, 2016 01:49 PM (8cftc)

446 I'd like to be angry at the media for this kind of stuff, but increasingly over the past several decades, I've learned to expect it from them.

I'd like to be angry at politicians for the shambles that our electoral process and our country as a whole has become but, again, I expect it from them. In fairness, they are doing (mostly) what the majority asked of them: "Give me free shit", "Make things fair", "Punish people who do more and/ or are better at things than I am".

Now I am livid with my "fellow" Americans. The majority of you voted for this shit. Fair enough. The majority got what you voted for (in the past several elections, the primaries, etc.). In the words of your current president, you won.

There's a catch. Just because you won does not compel me to support you in your accelerating march toward destruction. Whether you like it or not, I still claim my right to free will.

I will not comply. The choice is yours as to what you do next.

A) You can use force to compel me to comply and show yourself for who you really are. Go head. Come take what is mine by force. You're welcome to try. You might even win. That's fine. Even if it results in my death, I still win because you will have to live with what you've become and you are incapable of making any use of what I have, since you are nothing more than parasites. You will consume it and leave nothing but waste and I will no longer be there to turn waste into resources and continue to sustain you.

B) You can give me a divorce. I won't threaten you with violence to obtain it. I will only use force in equal proportion to the force you use on me. I simply wish to live in peace and succeed or fail on my own merits and own abilities. I am not asking for, nor do I want, nor to I require your help. I do not need or want anything from you. If I fail, the consequences are my own. I have no expectation of fairness of any sort nor any safety net or assistance of any kind from you. Leaving me alone requires absolutely nothing from you at all. Go ahead and take all that has been already been ceded to you thus far. I don't need it but you do. Consider it a parting gift.

Posted by: Damiano at October 20, 2016 01:50 PM (71OEY)

447 It's totally unhealthy and yet I do it compulsively. Gotta stop.
Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:46 PM (SUtNI)
---------------------

For your sanity, you're right. Your ideas are all sound but if I were you the first thing I'd do would be to get rid of all your social media. Who needs that kind of negativity?

Just unplug and go native for a while. Get outside with your kids more. Politics will always be there when you're ready to go back.

Posted by: bluebell at October 20, 2016 01:50 PM (uHcnA)

448 Is it possible to stay drunk until election day?

Posted by: Tinfoilbaby at October 20, 2016 01:50 PM (6Ll1u)

449 So, basically, a Hillary campaign ad delivered for free to smartphone users.
Posted by: OCBill at October 20, 2016 01:49 PM (df+Zi)




Let's see if that works out as well for Hilldawg as it did for U2.

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:51 PM (GUBah)

450 Recall that after the 2nd debate Hillary went on the Ellen show and whined about creepy Trump stalking her on the debate stage.

Oh, she's been pulling that shit for years.

Posted by: Rick Lazio: Where are they now at October 20, 2016 01:52 PM (qJhUV)

451 Texas Zombie:

I do wine....lots and lots of wine. The misses and I got into about 15 years ago. We didn't really have much in common and needed a good hobby after the kids leave the nest. I am by no means a wine snob. I enjoy wine because I also cook. There is a story in every bottle, the vintage year, growing conditions, soil it was grown, winemaker, etc.... Each bottle is like a little time capsule plus it just tastes damn good.

We try to find reasonably priced, quality, small quantity producers and stay away from the grocery store swill.

Lots of pluses...tastes better than Val-u-rite, fun thing to do with your bridge, good mellow buzz plus you can build up a stash pretty cheaply so you've got something to barter with when the SHTF which may very well happen regardless of who gets elected or selected in a couple of weeks.

Posted by: TehAdmiral at October 20, 2016 01:52 PM (NSy0M)

452 "a Hillary campaign ad delivered for free to smartphone users"

Should you be all googly and a twitter? Queers are just like regular folks who want to stick stuff up your butt.

Posted by: Ok at October 20, 2016 01:52 PM (8cftc)

453 Trump said Hillary stinks because it is true and will motivate voters he is wooing.
Posted by: Ok at October 20, 2016 01:49 PM (8cftc)




Actual quote from my 77yo LIV Mom last night:


"I don't care what he says, she *is* a nasty woman."

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:52 PM (GUBah)

454 Is it possible to stay drunk until election day?

Posted by: Tinfoilbaby at October 20, 2016 01:50 PM (6Ll1u)



Possible? Maybe not the right word. Mandatory? Inevitable? Or is it even possible NOT to?

Posted by: BurtTC at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (TOk1P)

455 314 Bob Scheiffer posited that Trump might attempt to stage a coup. Yes, he used the word "coup."

---------

Did he really?
Posted by: SH at October 20, 2016 01:26 PM (gmeXX)


They're establishing the narrative for a Trump victory. Stolen election, Russian hacking, etc.

Oh, and Trump supporters are racist and violent. Just like the Tea Partiers were.

Posted by: rickl the deplorable at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (zoehZ)

456 395 One thing I have noticed so far this week is that there have been none of the "Trump abandons Ohio, PA, FL, etc." stories. The were hitting pretty regular last week.
Posted by: The Great White Scotsman

I don't remember those stories - he can't abandon those states - he needs them.

Posted by: Donna and V. (sans ampersands at the present time) at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (u0lmX)

457 Have never tried it. Laying the keel January 2017...

http://tinyurl.com/z7mqvg3



Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 01:45 PM (Bdeb0)

That. Is. Awesome.

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (SUtNI)

458 OK, back to the office for me. Catch y'all in a bit.

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (GUBah)

459 Mememortal, I was about to bring that up because I have been seeing it everywhere. Thanks for not letting me embarrass myself.

Posted by: deplorable Jewells45 at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (zRZaJ)

460 http://tinyurl.com/z3hlmph

I know there's a new one up, but here's Al whining about 2000 election.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 01:54 PM (sj3Ax)

461 This thread is getting amusing. Yes, link in nick. And I'm actually half Oriental.

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:48 PM (GUBah)

Reading your most recent post, yeah, we are on the same page.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:54 PM (Idu2i)

462 What a pathetic loser. It's kind of embarrassing to watch.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters

Tedious and not funny.

Posted by: Cheri at October 20, 2016 01:54 PM (oiNtH)

463 I don't remember those stories - he can't abandon those states - he needs them.
Posted by: Donna and V. (sans ampersands at the present time) at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (u0lmX)




Voter suppression stories that sank because he was having yuge rallies in those states.

Posted by: Country Singer (gab @BertG) at October 20, 2016 01:54 PM (GUBah)

464 Well, I see our wish for a quality Troll has been answered.


Hey, Seattle. Tell me how you feel about the research that Internet Trolls are psychopaths. Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: An Observation at October 20, 2016 01:54 PM (IBLOg)

465 "I'm a UW Huskies fan. Born and bred." Seattle Slough

Sure. Sound more like a Duck than a Dawg. Genetic experiment gone horribly wrong?

Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 20, 2016 01:57 PM (hKi6n)

466 Ace is so awesome when he's pissed. Love it.

Posted by: Dang at October 20, 2016 01:57 PM (8b+oT)

467 El Noodo.

Posted by: Country Boy - Deplorable and proud of it at October 20, 2016 01:59 PM (Idu2i)

468 Bluebell,
That's good to hear.

Posted by: Carol at October 20, 2016 02:00 PM (sj3Ax)

469 452 Texas Zombie:

I do wine....lots and lots of wine. The misses and I got into about 15 years ago. We didn't really have much in common and needed a good hobby after the kids leave the nest. I am by no means a wine snob. I enjoy wine because I also cook. There is a story in every bottle, the vintage year, growing conditions, soil it was grown, winemaker, etc.... Each bottle is like a little time capsule plus it just tastes damn good.

We try to find reasonably priced, quality, small quantity producers and stay away from the grocery store swill.

Lots of pluses...tastes better than Val-u-rite, fun thing to do with your bridge, good mellow buzz plus you can build up a stash pretty cheaply so you've got something to barter with when the SHTF which may very well happen regardless of who gets elected or selected in a couple of weeks.
Posted by: TehAdmiral at October 20, 2016 01:52 PM (NSy0M)

Love it! I have cut way back on wine - mostly grocery store swill - due to my new Low Cab High Fat lifestyle. Trying to drop a lot of extra pounds and unfortunately the wine slows me down on that front. Will get back into it more after I get to wherever this LCHF journey is taking me. So far I am knocking on the door of being down 40 pounds since July 7.

Where do you primarily get your wines? Do you do any of the clubs like Laithwait's and the like? We have a new Total Wine in my area which I like visiting.

Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 02:01 PM (SUtNI)

470 >>Have never tried it. Laying the keel January 2017...
http://tinyurl.com/z7mqvg3


That. Is. Awesome. Posted by: Texas Zombie at October 20, 2016 01:53 PM (SUtNI)

I'm fortunate; there's a little architect studio on a corner of Plantation Zod (about 10'x16) away from the house, so I'm cleaning all the yard tools and junk out this fall, will set up a workbench, etc. Got inspired by a visit to the U.S. Naval Academy Model Museum several years ago. Used to build furniture back in college, so this'll be challenging in miniature.

Anyway, more than you asked for. Can't wait to get started!

Posted by: General Zod at October 20, 2016 02:02 PM (Bdeb0)

471
Hillary campaign ad delivered for free to smartphone users

Makes me glad I don't have a smartphone.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at October 20, 2016 02:03 PM (IqV8l)

472 Wow! Kristol tore Trump a new asshole.

That's gotta hurt!

Posted by: Maurice at October 20, 2016 02:06 PM (csjq3)

473 An Obsv:

I'm not a troll. Officially. http://ace.mu.nu/archives/347499.php

I am a "hectoring halfwit."
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/172905.php

Get it straight.

Show me the study that shows that hectoring halfwits are psychopaths and I'll look into it.

Posted by: Seattle Slough at October 20, 2016 02:10 PM (mCz8+)

474 Here's the current "conversation" in the country in a nutshell.

Conservatives want to live in a country with a government.

Liberals want to live in the opposite.

The end.

Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 02:16 PM (3myMJ)

475 Doesn't look like it's a secret given the above link that shows the entire process and times for a launch.


Posted by: Meremortal, Bigly Matters... at October 20, 2016 01:41 PM (3myMJ)

The link that says "about five minutes" vs Clinton's specific "four minutes"? Yeah, I'm thinking that's pretty much 100% the problem with her statement.

Posted by: Billy Dale at October 20, 2016 02:20 PM (x4zgf)

476 Just voted for Trump

Posted by: Make America Great Again at October 20, 2016 02:24 PM (ibGoc)

477 I love going to vote and see someone pull up in an out of state tag car and vote too.

Posted by: Make America Great Again at October 20, 2016 02:29 PM (ibGoc)

478 Posted by: Sirius the Canine Pundit at October 20, 2016 01:33 PM (LBO1U)
---

You miss the point - my use of "you" is the "royal you". All legal action to enforce a transfer of power has to be backed up by force if the power holder refuses, or it's "just words, just speeches". We can lay out a graph if you like another time, BECAUSE.......

My point was, the transition of power issue had fuck all to do with Wallace's question. Wallace then intentionally mixed transfer of power with "contesting election" once Trump answered in order to make Trump look "scary" and muddy the waters.

Posted by: SaltyDonnie at October 20, 2016 02:30 PM (i6shs)

479 I think it is time to end the daycare loophole.

Posted by: The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Barky at October 20, 2016 02:33 PM (hKi6n)

480 Wecome to the Crapper Voter registration process.

After you deposit your waste product, operate the indicated handle and our dispenser will issue your voting ballot along with the proper hygienic products.

Thank you for participating in our democracy.

Posted by: The Deep State at October 20, 2016 02:43 PM (G6fbz)

481 Here is my take, Trump was talking to O Keefe, he certainly knows what's going to be dropped next.

What if there is direct evidence of Hillary or Huma directing the illegal stuff?

Posted by: Make America Great Again at October 20, 2016 02:46 PM (ibGoc)

482 The disgust with the media is at an all time high. The left is loving this, but the independents who care about issues....are caring about actual issues. As for the Trump supporters, this is enraging them.

Let the left enjoy their last hurrah before accountability comes a'callin. In 9 days the push polling and modelling will stop. Those polls will align with the three tracking polls.

There will be much panick in Dem land when that happens.

Posted by: Charles at October 20, 2016 03:04 PM (Ts44+)

483 Pore ole algore, the Sex Poodle, still seeking his chakra. Bloated and bitter. Impotent and smelly. Even his scheme about climate changed has gone poorly. Pore ole algore,who invented the Internet. Now reduced to speaking with the corrupt cabal.

Hilz, the hag with lipstick on her teeth and chin last night, grinning her rictus hideous face at the thought of gays being killed, is no longer going to take naps. So she said last night before abruptly ending her press conference on her plane, as Jennifer Griffith, bless her, asked her about wikileaks and O'Keefe.

The noise of the media and fake online polls tells me the Dims are scared. They should be, as the wikileaks reveal their collusion with the most corrupt crime family in this country.

Mr. Trump is going to drain the swamp. Hopefully the Hag will find herself ignored as a failure, which she is as no accomplishment except ISIS, for the rest of her days. Bill will be dickin' all the bimbos, so he is fine. That hideous child of theirs will no longer have a future. Life will be good.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Deplorable Infidel Queen at October 20, 2016 03:08 PM (Cx8BK)

484 Oh, and my flying monkeys, I eagerly await future wikileaks and O'Keefe videos.

Let us pray there is one of her showing her racist stripes.

NY Post has an article of her own SS agents snickering when she broke her elbow as Sec of State. They despise her. Of course, no surprise, she blamed them for her breaking her elbow. Of course. She is a sociopath.

Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Deplorable Infidel Queen at October 20, 2016 03:11 PM (Cx8BK)

485 Did you know 17 agencies say Putin probably hacked us--but absolutely none of Hillary's classified emails were compromised!

It's a shame the Constitution doesn't provide for some kind of chief executive who could deal with problems like that. Barky who?

Or Hillary could just take it up with Vlad at her next Uranium Sale.

Posted by: The Gipper Lives at October 20, 2016 03:58 PM (Ndje9)

486 "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

That is the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
I assume that a presidential candidate remains a United States citizen during the election campaign, and that he retains his First Amendment right to "petition the government for redress of grievances" if he feels he has been defrauded in an election.
Much to the Left's chagrin...

Posted by: jbspry at October 20, 2016 05:11 PM (hxLER)

487 "Equality! Equality! Equality!"

"She's a real nasty woman"

"Aaaaaahhhh...SEXIST! SEXIST! SEXIST!"

Posted by: Me, That's Who at October 20, 2016 06:20 PM (0Hj5x)

488 Texas Zombie:

I've really been digging flash sites on the web like Last Bottle and Wines Til Sold Out. They seem to find some real gems at great prices.

Posted by: TehAdmiral at October 20, 2016 09:52 PM (O+RfY)

489 I think you cucks all need to get your heads turned into much by my baseball bat.

Posted by: Negan at October 24, 2016 12:08 PM (s2K35)

(Jump to top of page)






Processing 0.07, elapsed 0.0663 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0109 seconds, 498 records returned.
Page size 287 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.7 alpha.



MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat