The BBC: Hating Jews Since 1922 [CBD]

The BBC is up to its old tricks, Notice that the attack seems to have been perpetrated by Jerusalem. That's one nasty city! It's their old trope: Don't name the Arabs as murdering scum, and focus on the Israelis. Read the article at the link....

Here's an article about the killing that is less animated by good old Jew-Hate.

Just ponder for a moment the mindset required for a terrorist to attack a woman carrying a toddler (or pushing him in a stroller).

And Open Thread.....For Football see above.

Posted by: Open Blogger at 07:29 PM

Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 Same thing happens every time Israel kills terrorists for being terrorists...

Posted by: exdem13 at October 04, 2015 07:27 PM (ry4ab)

2 Back when I was big into shortwave listening the BBC was considered the gold standard for news. Things have sure gone downhill.

Posted by: Vic-we have no party at October 04, 2015 07:29 PM (t2KH5)

3 Anybody here remember the days before 1983 when Israel was supported by the West in deed if not always in word? I swear, these days if Israel sent another team to the Olympics and they were killed like Munich, the MSM would find a way to praise the terrorists and say the Israeli athletes deserved it for being dirty damn Jooos.

Posted by: exdem13 at October 04, 2015 07:30 PM (ry4ab)

4 The BBC: Hating Jews Since 1922

Meh ... Britain has hated Jews for many hundreds of years. Jews are even explicitly mentioned in the Magna Carta - but only to be screwed over by the poor, grieving kids of nobles.

And, in fairness to the BBC, they also hate Brits. Weren't the BBC the ones who came up with the idea of calling islamic terror attacks "anti-islam attacks" because they made islam look bad? Or maybe that was Labour ... BBC .. Labour ... what difference, at this point, does it make?

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 04, 2015 07:32 PM (zc3Db)

5 Sanpaku eyes are definitely a thing in Japan. Anytime an anime/manga/game character is shown with sanpaku eyes they are total vicious nutters, ready to do something very bad...

Posted by: exdem13 at October 04, 2015 07:34 PM (ry4ab)

6 The headline writer is most likely not what most would consider as of "English" descent. Probably not much of a Church of England man either, if you get my drift.

Not that English officialdom will care, nor the BBC--they value "diversity" more than accuracy, and as far as those whom are the beneficiaries--they pull for the home team. To tell them they can't is "racist".

Posted by: Horatius at October 04, 2015 07:36 PM (UKhBB)

7 Europe is fucked, so see it while you can!

Posted by: model1066 at October 04, 2015 07:36 PM (ZYfQM)

8 Missiles fly the 15th. Get ready for Obama trying to bomb Israel.

Posted by: count-down-started at October 04, 2015 07:41 PM (PGh+Q)

9 Posted by: count-down-started at October 04, 2015 07:41 PM (PGh+Q)

What the heck are you talking about?

Posted by: Infidel at October 04, 2015 07:42 PM (wxDxI)

10 Obama bombs hospital Clinton bombed aspirin factory. Is Obama going to be caught doing a little boy in the oval office? Or even worse, smoking a cigarette?

Posted by: 1-up Clinton at October 04, 2015 07:45 PM (PGh+Q)

11 UN treaty with Iran takes effect the 18th. Iran moving troops into Syria. Israel has to take out Iran. Obama is on the other side. Israel has to take out Iran in a way that neutralizes both Russia and US. 15th is Islam new year. Rhymes with yom kippur war. Hang on to you asses.

Posted by: count-down-started at October 04, 2015 07:49 PM (PGh+Q)

12 Even the 2nd article spends 8 paragraphs explaining the injuries and the conditions of those who were attacked --- without ever identifying anything about the attacker.
All passive voice, such as "was stabbed".

Un-fargin'-believable!!

Posted by: Lizzy at October 04, 2015 07:51 PM (NOIQH)

13 The thing that infuriates me is that if that bombing of the Drs without borders had happened during any Republican administration the left, the anti-war movement and the MSM would be on the move filling the streets day in and day out but yet we get crickets during the thug reign of the SCOAMF.

Whatever happened to the "anti-war" movement?

Matter of fact what ever happened to that deranged gay train engineer that intentionally crashed that amtrak train?

It's completely dissapeared from the news.

Posted by: Kreplach at October 04, 2015 07:51 PM (WVvzl)

14
AlJizz did something similar but then later retracted it after much mockery.

Posted by: Bruce With a Wang! at October 04, 2015 07:51 PM (iQIUe)

15 11 Did not know that. I haven't been following on a daily basis. Does not sound good. I stand with Israel.

Posted by: Infidel at October 04, 2015 07:54 PM (wxDxI)

16 >>if that bombing of the Drs without borders had happened during any Republican administration the left, the anti-war movement and the MSM would be on the move filling the streets day in and day out

Recall the months and months of coverage of Abu Garib. That happened over the course of....one night. And it was reported by a serviceman who witnessed it, and the perpetrators were in the process of being prosecuted when the MSM got the story.
Oh, and no one died.

Posted by: Lizzy at October 04, 2015 07:55 PM (NOIQH)

17 Britain has hated Jews for many hundreds of years.

Off again, on again. It's a cycle, like Yerp, but on a different loop.
Jews were expelled in 1290, shipped out, stranded on the Thames estuary, left to drown when the tide came in. The monk who wrote about it was the first to use "holocaustus" in English.

In the Romantic era, as anti-semitism perked up on yon Continent, Walter Scott had sympathetic, then heroic, Jewish characters, and it became less offensive to be Jewish. There was Disraeli, you know. And, there was backlash to Disraeli.

You won't find an unbroken trend over centuries for either tolerance or pogroms. In Germany, the cycles ran 300 years, but they definitely were cycles. Like climate.

Posted by: Stringer Davis at October 04, 2015 08:05 PM (xq1UY)

18 I do remember reading that British sailors actually asked their command on ship to turn off the BBC during operations in Desert Shield and then Desert Storm (1990-1991)

It was that bad.

Posted by: Bossy Conservative...a rube in America at October 04, 2015 08:08 PM (+1T7c)

19 The MFM is lying and misleading? Well. Knock me over with a feather. I showed my mom this altered picture broadcast by CNN, a pic which is severely photoshopped, of the Oregon shooter:

http://tinyurl.com/q5obww7

(Gateway Pundit)

The CNN version makes him out to be white. Not just his complexion; look at how his lips have been thinned and his nose has been Anglicized.

The same lightened complexion thing was done with George Zimmerman, history's first white-hispanic according to the media.

The media is actively altering The Narrative before our lying eyes.

Posted by: GnuBreed at October 04, 2015 08:12 PM (gyKtp)

20
Matter of fact what ever happened to that deranged gay train engineer that intentionally crashed that amtrak train?

It's completely dissapeared from the news.

Posted by: Kreplach at October 04, 2015 07:51 PM (WVvzl)

I was pondering this very thing earlier in the week. My Google-Fu is weak, I suspect we'll need an insider for *real* information.

Posted by: Steck at October 04, 2015 08:13 PM (ibSYs)

21 Oh, and did youse guys know that our Senate, led by that slug faced McTurtle, inserted a clause into the new NDAA bill that allows TFG to close Gitmo?

http://tinyurl.com/q9oddos

(Heritage)

Oh sure, there's a bunch of conditions that must be met; yeah, 404Care had a bunch of benchmarks too. L. O. L.

Posted by: GnuBreed at October 04, 2015 08:27 PM (gyKtp)

22 >>>I do remember reading that British sailors actually
asked their command on ship to turn off the BBC during operations in
Desert Shield and then Desert Storm (1990-1991)
It was that bad.
Posted by: Bossy Conservative...a rube in America at October 04, 2015 08:08 PM (+1T7c)<<<

I hope they turned to CNN.

Posted by: Iraqi Pete at October 04, 2015 08:36 PM (ifEqP)

23 Bush opened Gitmo for terrorist. The next President can re-open it if it is still needed. Obama is about to unravel. He is costing his backers a fortune in money and power.
Look at what he has done.
Capable people have stored canned goods.
Capable people have guns and ammo.
Capable people have moved away from crony capitalist hell holes.
Capable people are quitting military or being forced out.
US has all the high cost fracking oil pumping or ready to pump in an emergency.
US has refiners set up to refine fracking oil.
Obama's keystone decision and QE from the Federal Reserve made fracking oil possible.
US is set to go all isolationist. Obama will be hash tagging demanding capable people save his ass.

Posted by: won't matter at October 04, 2015 08:42 PM (PGh+Q)

24 One of the most antisemetic pieces of crap I've seen was the mini series The Promise shown on IBC (similar to BBC). It was by the guy who did Wolfe Hall who plans to do a miniseries on ISIS. You can expect it to be very sympathetic to islamic nuts.

Posted by: Bruce With a Wang! at October 04, 2015 08:43 PM (iQIUe)

25 I hate the media even more than I hate Obama and Hillary. They are the ones who promote lies and idiocy. They cover for evil.

Posted by: Beth M at October 04, 2015 08:51 PM (kiy9d)

26 2
Back when I was big into shortwave listening the BBC was considered the gold standard for news. Things have sure gone downhill.

Posted by: Vic-we have no party at October 04, 2015 07:29 PM (t2KH5)

Had a Blaupunkt in a Benz 40 years ago. Shortwave receiver. Loved listening to the BBC.

Posted by: trainer at October 04, 2015 08:52 PM (7EbAY)

27 I mentioned it on the book thread, but the Charlie Rose interview with Putin is very good. He talks about how you have to support the legitimate government of Syria to prevent it from becoming the next Libya. I found myself agreeing with him too many times.

Posted by: Notsothoreau at October 04, 2015 08:56 PM (Lqy/e)

28 25 I hate the media even more than I hate Obama and Hillary. They are the ones who promote lies and idiocy. They cover for evil.
Posted by: Beth M at October 04, 2015 08:51 PM (kiy9d)

Yes, and I hold the media 100% responsible for giving us Obama. If they had shown the least interest in his murky and mysterious background, he never would have even been nominated.

Has there been any other Presidential candidate where the media showed no interest in his background at all? I can't think of one.

Posted by: rickl at October 04, 2015 09:04 PM (sdi6R)

29 Posted by: Stringer Davis at October 04, 2015 08:05 PM (xq1UY)

You gave a much better, and more accurate, history. I had oversimplified it a bit.

And don't forget Wellington.

Posted by: ThePrimordialOrderedPair at October 04, 2015 09:07 PM (zc3Db)

30 28: The media found there prog god king they had been looking for. They purposely showed no interest. The MSM are leftist apparatchiks with by-lines.

Posted by: Puddleglum at October 04, 2015 09:08 PM (syGA0)

31 WRT to the supposed CNN photo edit of the Oregon Loser, I don't trust anybody at this point. As I said the Night Of - we're at 306% Speculation, and hardly anything has been backed up.

Given the 7-hour delay, *anything* from social media is suspect, and given things like disproportionate footage of his Dad (who didn't know him) and LA Times' "white supremacy" angle out of thin air, nothing from the MSM, either.

And given the secrecy and dodges and weird crap like taking cellphones, nothing from officialdom, either.

Clearly "news" from blogs is breaking down, too. Usually I see a fair amount of what people say backed up, this time it's almost nothing.

The consequence or lies - lost trust.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at October 04, 2015 09:22 PM (bLnSU)

32 Palestinian spokesman praised the heroic operation.

How f&*^ed up is your culture when going after a toddler and his mom with a knife makes you a hero?

Posted by: JPS at October 04, 2015 09:30 PM (9ziuC)

33 Belmont Club has been more active than usual lately, and that's not necessarily a good thing.

It may be that shit's about to get real.

Posted by: Cloyd Freud, Unemployed at October 04, 2015 09:40 PM (u5gzz)

34 Speaking of absolute off-topic bullshit that tries to turn an issue 180 degrees from facts, Tepid Zephyr has a quote of the day regarding the Oregon shootings: "How on earth could he compile 13 guns? How can that happen, you know? They talk about gun laws, they talk about gun control. Every time something like this happens they talk about it and nothing is done. I'm not trying to say that's to blame for what happened, but if Chris hadn't been able to get ahold of 13 guns it wouldn't have happened."

Ummm....how many of those 13 guns were actually used during the assault? 3? What is the relevance of the other 10, 'cause I'm not seeing any.....

Posted by: cthulhu at October 04, 2015 09:51 PM (EzgxV)

35 Ummm....how many of those 13 guns were actually used during the assault? 3? What is the relevance of the other 10, 'cause I'm not seeing any.....
Posted by: cthulhu at October 04, 2015 09:51 PM (EzgxV)

******

It helps to shape the "Arsenal" narrative while the MFM are busy ignoring/rewriting/scrubbing the "Muslim/BLM/Shares an ethnic heritage with our President" background of the guy.

This way they get what they see as a threefer.

Posted by: ManWithNoParty at October 04, 2015 09:58 PM (lVVRV)

36 34 Ummm....how many of those 13 guns were actually used during the assault? 3? What is the relevance of the other 10, 'cause I'm not seeing any.....

Posted by: cthulhu at October 04, 2015 09:51 PM (EzgxV)

Oh, that's easy to explain. The other 10 (7 actually as he was supposedly carrying 6 with him) were providing emotional support to the used guns. Sorta like therapy dogs, or something.

See? easy-peasy.

Posted by: GnuBreed at October 04, 2015 10:00 PM (gyKtp)

37 Oh, that's easy to explain. The other 10 (7 actually as he was supposedly carrying 6 with him) were providing emotional support to the used guns. Sorta like therapy dogs, or something.

Hrm. I'm suddenly not entirely sure I don't need a few therapy guns myself. Because of my disabilites, you know. Wouldn't want to discriminate now, Mr. Gummint Man.

Posted by: Snoodling World Champion 1997 at October 04, 2015 10:12 PM (k9qR4)

38 If WWII were to repeat itself today, the Brits would more than likely side with the Nazis based on anti-Semitism alone. Shit, European anti-Semitism is probably at least partially fueling their collective race to submit to Islam.

Posted by: holygoat at October 04, 2015 10:43 PM (aXyCW)

39 If Britain wants to get rid of its Joos it should let a buncha Ayrabs in there.

Oh, wait.

Posted by: Hank at October 04, 2015 10:56 PM (JyDJn)

Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.011 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.0046 seconds, 48 records returned.
Page size 41 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.