Support




Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd.aoshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Powered by
Movable Type





Hillary Received Now-Classified Information In Her Unsecured Private Emails

She had claimed there "is" no classified information in her emails.

Well, there was, before she deleted them.

When she originally received the email, it was merely "sensitive" information. The FBI later classified it as "secret."

Here's the interesting thing: We know this is now secret because it is redacted in the emails released by State.

And what's it about? The Benghazi Attack.

It just so happens that the emails are going to be redacted whenever they're about Benghazi, I guess.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received information on her private email server about the deadly attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi that has now been classified.

The email in question, forwarded to Clinton by her deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan, relates to reports of arrests in Libya of possible suspects in the attack.

Because the information was not classified at the time the email was sent, no laws were violated. But Friday's redaction shows that Clinton received information considered sensitive on her unsecured personal server, which came to light just as she was beginning her presidential campaign.

Clinton, campaigning in New Hampshire, said Friday she was aware that the FBI wanted some of the email to be classified, "but that doesn't change the fact all of the information in the emails was handled appropriately."

Asked if she was concerned it was on a private server, she replied, "No."

...

[The FBI] said 23 words of the Nov. 18, 2012, message were redacted from Friday's release of 296 emails totaling 896 pages to protect information that could harm national security and damage foreign relations.

A little context: The New York Times had previously questioned Hillary's claim that "no" classified information "is" in the emails, because the US Government routinely classifies lots and lots of things.

WASHINGTON — Anyone who has tried to pry information from the federal government may have been surprised on Tuesday by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s assertion that in all her emails in four years as secretary of state, she never strayed into the classified realm.

After all, a consensus among Republicans and Democrats for many years has been that the government routinely overclassifies information, reflexively stamping "secret" on mountains of documents with marginally sensitive content. The government classified more than 80 million documents in 2013, according to the Information Security Oversight Office, which publishes an annual count.

...

But some secrecy experts and former government officials on Tuesday were skeptical, noting the interesting turnabout that had a former top official insisting, for once, that none of her exchanges were secret.

Update: Hillary's unsecured emails announced, in 2011, the locations and travel plans of American officials serving in Libya.

Chris Stevens could not be reached for comment.

Noah Rothman quotes The New York Times:

Mrs. Clinton's emails show that she had a special type of government information known as "sensitive but unclassified," or "SBU," in her account. That information included the whereabouts and travel plans of American officials in Libya as security there deteriorated during the uprising against the leadership of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi in 2011. Nearly a year and a half before the attacks in Benghazi, Mr. Stevens, then an American envoy to the rebels, considered leaving Benghazi citing deteriorating security, according to an email to Mrs. Clinton marked "SBU."

Posted by: Ace at 03:08 PM




Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 Come on.

Posted by: Eileen at May 22, 2015 03:09 PM (v8Svi)

2 so slanty

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:09 PM (AkOaV)

3 Broke the blog again

Posted by: Iblis at May 22, 2015 03:09 PM (4lSjy)

4 Here we go again...

Posted by: HH at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (Ce4DF)

5 Obligatory comment about journalistic slant.

Posted by: Kinley Ardal at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (6JL3d)

6 How...interesting that this comes out the Friday before Memorial Day.

Posted by: Lauren at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (MYCIw)

7 Is it my turn, yet?

Posted by: The Reckoning at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (ecDRv)

8 ace, I'm not a fan of this slanted coverage of the Clintons.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (AkOaV)

9 "MEET HOT SINGLE WOMEN IN YOUR AREA"



"re: Benghazi suspects links to known terrorists"

Posted by: Hillary! at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (Tj+s6)

10 spam!

Posted by: Hillary! at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (Tj+s6)

11 Who gives a rat's ass. We all know the real damning stuff was deleted months or years ago.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 22, 2015 03:11 PM (/tNwW)

12
Depends on what the definition of "lying bitch" is.

Posted by: Supadeposition at May 22, 2015 03:11 PM (agXt1)

13 This one weird trick will keep you out of jail . . .

Posted by: Count de Monet at May 22, 2015 03:12 PM (JO9+V)

14 Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 22, 2015 03:11 PM (/tNwW)

She probably had a "burner" folder set up in her outlook the whole time.

"this is the shit I need to back up to a thumb drive ASAP, bury in a bottle on pedo island where the US govt cant get at it (just in case), then delete."

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:13 PM (AkOaV)

15 Asked if she was concerned it was on a private server, she replied, "No."

Of course she wasn't concerned. She never thought we would see them.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:13 PM (ODxAs)

16 Dude! This was like MORE than two years ago by now.

Posted by: Tommy Vietor at May 22, 2015 03:13 PM (xSCb6)

17 Heh.

Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 22, 2015 03:13 PM (LA7Cm)

18 Laws are for the little people.

Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 22, 2015 03:14 PM (LA7Cm)

19 8 ace, I'm not a fan of this slanted coverage of the Clintons.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:10 PM (AkOaV)

That's pretty good.

Posted by: Austin in TX at May 22, 2015 03:14 PM (F9Hpt)

20 Anyone surprised? Anyone? Thought so.

Posted by: Zombie Vince Foster at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (NPgvx)

21 When can they file a RICO case against the Clinton Crime Family. They have to be bigger than the Casa Nostra at this point

Posted by: Iblis at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (4lSjy)

22 She had claimed there "is" no classified information in her emails.

Her husband taught her the ol' "depends n what the definition of "is" is" trick.

We all laughed about it in 1997, but guess what? He pulled it off, and is now a respected elder statesman.

He taught his wife well. (Even though she was the one he was cheating on with the "is is" lie).

Circles within circles, turtles all the way down, etc. and so forth.

Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (jBuUi)

23 Lets be fair to Hillary Clinton. She raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the poor, which she then kept for herself.

Posted by: billy sastard at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (VDovR)

24 The Italicans have landed!

Posted by: some random meathead at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (Qgr71)

25 Yes, yes...now fuck off, peasants.

Posted by: Hillary! at May 22, 2015 03:16 PM (YFFpo)

26 The really secret stuff is on her AOL account.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 22, 2015 03:16 PM (oKE6c)

27 ...and sail away again.

Cowards.

Posted by: some random meathead at May 22, 2015 03:16 PM (Qgr71)

28 Color me shocked...
*yaaawwwnnn*

Posted by: chi's sandwIch (previously shredded chi) at May 22, 2015 03:17 PM (OYmAq)

29 23 Lets be fair to Hillary Clinton. She raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the poor, which she then kept for herself.

Posted by: billy sastard at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (VDovR)




For safekeeping. There are a lot of unscrupulous, greedy bastards out there, you know.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 22, 2015 03:17 PM (oKE6c)

30 Apparently, at this point, it doesn't make any difference.

Posted by: Roland THTG at May 22, 2015 03:18 PM (QM5S2)

31 The Clintons force their slant on everything.

Posted by: DaveA at May 22, 2015 03:19 PM (DL2i+)

32 Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 22, 2015 03:17 PM (oKE6c)

Well, she WAS dead broke when leaving the white house, so...

just depends on what your definition of "poor" is, I suppose.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:19 PM (AkOaV)

33 Lying bitches lie. Water wet. Sun comes up in the east. News at 11. My rage meter broke a long time ago.

Posted by: Chavez the Hugo at May 22, 2015 03:19 PM (ucDmr)

34 I'm a generous spirit. Just think how much money I'd be making if I actually had to *work* as a full-time lobbyist.

Posted by: Chelsea Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:19 PM (fIp5S)

35 The real question is, who is the bigger, more treasonous lying douchebag of shit: Hillary or Bill?

Posted by: Tex Lovera at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (wtvvX)

36 From : hrod@aol.com
To : srice@yahoo.com

Subject : What about blaming a Video?

?????????
running out of ideas here, Susie. BHO seems to like this one.

HRC

Posted by: some random meathead at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (Qgr71)

37 Said it before, I'll say it again: The D party will NOT be nominating Hillery. At this point it doesn't matter whether it's the Obama people or someone else, this stuff is going to come out, and will continue coming out until she announces she's done with running for office.

I also believe they are being gentle with her. So far.

Posted by: BurtTC at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (TOk1P)

38 Posted by: Tex Lovera at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (wtvvX)

Bill.

Because he has the ability to look you in the face, smile, shake your hand, make you feel like he really cares about you and your thoughts, while both you and he and everyone else knows he is full of shit.

Hillary is just a shrew.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (AkOaV)

39
Fuckin' Italicans....

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 22, 2015 03:21 PM (lpeQC)

40 33 Water wet. Sun comes up in the east. News at 11. My rage meter broke a long time ago.
Posted by: Chavez the Hugo


Pretty much sums up what I meant with "Circles within circles, turtles all the way down, etc. and so forth."

My mind is a supernova caught in mid rage-explosion, frozen that way forever.

Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:21 PM (jBuUi)

41 I just queefed.

Posted by: Hitlery Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:21 PM (fIp5S)

42 Mrs. Clinton, can you tell me why the right wing controlled media is atttacking you as as an evil, lying, corrupt, manipulative bitch instead of the loving, doting mother, grandmother and wife that you obviously are?

Posted by: Real Everyday American at May 22, 2015 03:21 PM (YFFpo)

43 Also, I don't mind if this whole damned thing plays out slowly over the next 12 to 15 months.

Let the steady drip of damning details slowly erode her away. I'm in no hurry...

Posted by: The Wheels of Justice at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (wtvvX)

44 Hillary is of the Party that Ace and others have chosen to support. They want more and will get more of the same.

Posted by: LincolnTf at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (2cS/G)

45
I am still amazed (but in no way surprised) that a Gun-Running Operation to a terrorist organization that got a US ambassador killed, and then lying and blamed on a videographer that was imprisoned for a year, and sensitive information about it held on a private server against the law by a sitting Secretary of State is NOT a big story.

Sure we talk conservatives talk about it, but I point you to Iran-Contra where nothing even close to what has happened here was a big deal for years.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (ODxAs)

46 Hillary's unprecdented transparency is a model for us all.

Posted by: George Stephanoupholis at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (OD2ni)

47 The LIV's will vote for Hillary because she's really good at being corrupt. And we should have the most competent corrupt person in office....

Posted by: shibumi who is awash in existential dread at May 22, 2015 03:24 PM (uIyMM)

48 42 Mrs. Clinton, can you tell me why the right wing controlled media is atttacking you as as an evil, lying, corrupt, manipulative bitch instead of the loving, doting mother, grandmother, great-grandmother, crone, hag, octogenarean, super-senior, ancient, craggy, flabby, fossilized geriatric wife that you obviously are?
Posted by: Real Everyday American

FTFY.

Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:24 PM (jBuUi)

49 Face it: if this had been anyone else, they would be out of the race and facing IRS scrutiny of their phony foundation.

Posted by: Adjoran at May 22, 2015 03:25 PM (QIQ6j)

50 Posted by: Tex Lovera at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (wtvvX)



Bill.



Because he has the ability to look you in the face, smile, shake
your hand, make you feel like he really cares about you and your
thoughts, while both you and he and everyone else knows he is full of
shit.



Hillary is just a shrew.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:20 PM (AkOaV)

Yeah, I guess that is what it boils down to: do you prefer the sack of shit who pretends to be nice to you, or the sack of shit who's openly contemptuous.

Posted by: Tex Lovera at May 22, 2015 03:25 PM (wtvvX)

51 46 Hillary's unprecdented transparency is a model for us all.
Posted by: George Stephanoupholis at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (OD2ni)

--STFU and go back to talking about ancient aliens.

Posted by: logprof at May 22, 2015 03:25 PM (ETUnb)

52 Aaannnndddd, this is my shocked face.

Posted by: Old Blue at May 22, 2015 03:25 PM (9iR5/)

53 Just so we're straight here: Republicans are attempting to get information from the federal government--wait, no, more accurately and specifically, we're attempting to get information from the Obama Administration that can potentially compromise and possibly irreparably damage the Democratic Party's most likely to win 2016 presidential candidate.

Right, yeah, sure.

Posted by: troyriser at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (XHR9b)

54
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 22, 2015 03:11 PM (/tNwW)

She probably had a "burner" folder set up in her outlook the whole time.

"this is the shit I need to back up to a thumb drive ASAP, bury in a bottle on pedo island where the US govt cant get at it (just in case), then delete."

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:13 PM (AkOaV)








Even more frightening is the possibility that she thought her personal server was secure because she made sure to lock the kitchen door every day, and besides, no one would think that a Secretary of State would keep a separate email address. That's just crazy talk.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (lpeQC)

55 So the Beast was lying, like everybody didn't already assume that.

I wonder how much Hillary would being in that ISIS slave market. If Moo Shell is valued around 40 clam, I can't imagine Hillary bringing more than 5.

Posted by: maddogg at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (xWW96)

56 Guarantee this doesn't hurt her campaign at all. The people who want to vote for her don't care, the press will brush it off, and the people who don't like her wouldn't have voted for her anyway.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (39g3+)

57 Hillary's unprecdented transparency is a model for us all.

Posted by: George Stephanoupholis at May 22, 2015 03:23 PM (OD2ni)


No no, that would be me, not her.

Posted by: Brucella Jenner at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (TOk1P)

58 She had claimed there "is" no classified information in her emails.

She's simply not as good as her husband at this.

Posted by: AmishDude at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (L2xDv)

59 Mrs. Clinton, can you tell me why the right wing controlled media insists on trying to badger you with intrusive and embarrassing questions about your private and public life?

Posted by: Real Everyday American at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (YFFpo)

60 Get your Ace in the barrel!

Posted by: 1bulwetweft at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (nqiq9)

61 56
Guarantee this doesn't hurt her campaign at all. The people who want to
vote for her don't care, the press will brush it off, and the people
who don't like her wouldn't have voted for her anyway.

THIS.

Posted by: shibumi who is awash in existential dread at May 22, 2015 03:27 PM (uIyMM)

62 #23:

Lets be fair to Hillary Clinton. She raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the poor, which she then kept for herself.
______________________

THANK YOU....what more need be said?

Posted by: Alwyr at May 22, 2015 03:28 PM (V0j3u)

63 It is hard to avoid shock and rage burnout. Yep, evil corruption again by the Clintons. Next item in the stack. Same thing happened with Bill was in office, I remember the scandals and awful activities piled up so bad you couldn't even keep track. There were so many, so bad, you'd forget them all. After a while you just threw up your hands and walked away because none of it made the slightest difference

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:28 PM (39g3+)

64 Yeah, I guess that is what it boils down to: do you prefer the sack of shit who pretends to be nice to you, or the sack of shit who's openly contemptuous.



Honestly? The openly contemptuous one.

I prefer my enemies identified.

Posted by: rickb223 Straight, Conservative Clinger at May 22, 2015 03:28 PM (5KY1+)

65 Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 22, 2015 03:26 PM (lpeQC)

Heh, yeah.

Well, secure or not, she was more focused on keeping her emails safe from FOIA requests and from the Obama team then whether or not foreign governments and/or individuals could read them.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 22, 2015 03:28 PM (AkOaV)

66 you guys thinking what I'm thinking? The best thing for this is amnesty, plus unlimited H1B, L1B visas.

Posted by: joe-impeachin44 at May 22, 2015 03:28 PM (dFXmO)

67 Used to be that id a candidate was caught with "a dead girl or a live boy," his career would be over.

But Hillary just got caught with a dead ambassador and a live Muslim Brotherhood member, and her career is doing just fine.

Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:29 PM (jBuUi)

68 id a candidate = if a candidate

Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:29 PM (jBuUi)

69 43 Also, I don't mind if this whole damned thing plays out slowly over the next 12 to 15 months.

Let the steady drip of damning details slowly erode her away. I'm in no hurry...


Yeah. That could go either way. It could keep the MSM from completely ignoring all the issues surrounding HRM, and it should be devastating that both the email and Benghazi scandals are now demonstrably linked, in potentially a causal fashion.

But.

The LIV/FSA are numerous, monstrously stupid, and will be easily convinced, to the extent they pay attention at all, that this is all the VRWC simply unwilling to stop being mean to Hillary. It will be the War on Women applied to Hillary specifically, and the fact that there will never be a conviction, let alone hearings, or even any sort of sanction applied to her, will be raised as evidence that this is all a non-issue to everyone but Ted Cruz and his three friends.

It all hinges on whether the MSM coalesces in the end behind Hillary or another Dem candidate. They will use the info or spin it accordingly, and the masses will follow.

Posted by: TexasDan at May 22, 2015 03:29 PM (TqXWc)

70 You have to wonder just how many foreign governments and bad actors were reading her e-mails in real time. Hacking e-mail accounts is relatively easy. I've been hacked and I know that many of you here have been hacked. How hard would it be to hack her private server?

Posted by: Old Blue at May 22, 2015 03:29 PM (9iR5/)

71 But Hillary just got caught with a dead ambassador and a live Muslim Brotherhood member, and her career is doing just fine.
Posted by: zombie at May 22, 2015 03:29 PM (jBuUi)




I don't think so. I think Hillary is so seriously done.

Posted by: maddogg at May 22, 2015 03:30 PM (xWW96)

72 What the low info twerp will say to all this is "emails? Dude who hasn't emailed stuff they regret. Whaev's"

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:30 PM (39g3+)

73 this also shows how underfunded the State Department was because of Paul Ryan's spending cuts.

Posted by: joe-impeachin44 at May 22, 2015 03:30 PM (dFXmO)

74 Again, the comments are still free, and that's worth the admission price alone! What a bargain! Not even Woolworths could top that.

Posted by: Killerdog at May 22, 2015 03:31 PM (/mhj3)

75 At this point only examples of the Clintons' actually complying with the law would surprise me.

Posted by: Jacob's Step Stool at May 22, 2015 03:31 PM (VNgld)

76 LIVs Shrugged

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:31 PM (7ObY1)

77
The only way I would see if hillary is toast is if I knew for sure that the obamas were behind a lot of this stuff, which I suspect, but not sure.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:32 PM (ODxAs)

78 56 Guarantee this doesn't hurt her campaign at all. The people who want to vote for her don't care, the press will brush it off, and the people who don't like her wouldn't have voted for her anyway.

Yep. But it is good to see her facing at last SOME scrutiny. The more we can get her fugly mug in front of the camera, the more voters she chases away. She really is a bad candidate who generates a lot of negative feelings. I worry more about the Obama-like black horse (I denounce myself) that comes out of nowhere and gathers a lot of momentum.

Posted by: 1bulwetweft at May 22, 2015 03:32 PM (nqiq9)

79 Come on Democrats, get a non scummy, non lying grifter to be your nominee. You've got to be embarrassed on just how bad Hillary is as a human being. Even if she was as honest as a normal politician could be she still has the personality of a rock . A really boring rock.

Posted by: Cruzinator at May 22, 2015 03:32 PM (8cSVB)

80 I've been hacked and I know that many of you here have been hacked. How hard would it be to hack her private server?


Password 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Posted by: rickb223 Straight, Conservative Clinger at May 22, 2015 03:33 PM (5KY1+)

81 Mrs. Clinton, can you tell me why the right wing controlled media and their Republican puppet masters
insist on trying to sabotage your campaign with totally unsubstantiated rumors and vile innuendo about your private and public life?

Posted by: Real Everyday American at May 22, 2015 03:33 PM (YFFpo)

82 I've been hacked and I know that many of you here have been hacked. How hard would it be to hack her private server?

Her password was password1234.

Posted by: Vladimir Putin at May 22, 2015 03:33 PM (8ZskC)

83 [Nearly a year and a half before the attacks in Benghazi, Mr. Stevens,
then an American envoy to the rebels, considered leaving Benghazi
citing deteriorating security, according to an email to Mrs. Clinton
marked "SBU."


And she left them that way, while her ambassador travelled there.

She failed to upgrade security, even though she knew.



Posted by: Pappy O'Daniel at May 22, 2015 03:34 PM (oVJmc)

84 79 Come on Democrats, get a non scummy, non lying grifter to be your nominee.


Pretty hard to find a non-scummy, non-grifter in either party anymore.

Or should I say, more accurately, in either wing of the one party we have, the Democrat Party.

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:34 PM (7ObY1)

85 "Email and Data Security" by Chelsea Clinton

Posted by: Stateless Infidel at May 22, 2015 03:34 PM (AC0lD)

86 23 words? Why? How many words is "Hey Hill, you just know the Jews are behind this!"?

Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at May 22, 2015 03:35 PM (9Du4t)

87 Hillary Clinton gives not a rat's ass about the national security interests of the United States, unless they can be monetized.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 22, 2015 03:35 PM (8ZskC)

88 "How to Make Friends and Influence People" by Chelsea Clinton

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:35 PM (7ObY1)

89 Give her a break...Electricity is new to her generation

Posted by: Mr Wizard at May 22, 2015 03:36 PM (hCdMd)

90 Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:34 PM (7ObY1)

You think Cruz, Walker or Carson are scummy grifters?

Posted by: Cruzinator at May 22, 2015 03:36 PM (8cSVB)

91 Vince Foster and Ron Brown could not be reached for comment.

Posted by: dfbaskwill at May 22, 2015 03:36 PM (MVitU)

92
Hillary is very good at more than just covering up incriminating emails.

As a matter of fact, she's marvelous!

Posted by: Huma Abedin, Aide to Hillary Fatima Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:36 PM (P330y)

93
Even worse than knowing about the poor security situation is that when the attack occurred they did nothing. CNN and the NYT got there before they did.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (ODxAs)

94 You think Cruz, Walker or Carson are scummy grifters?


No. That's why I said "pretty hard" and not "impossible."

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (7ObY1)

95 "My Life with the Thrill Kill Kult" by Chelsea Clinton

Posted by: The Reckoning at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (ecDRv)

96 Stephy and his bs about how he gave money b/c it was going to good causes. Did he ever check to see if the money was actually going to good causes? No. If you are going to donate that amt of money isnt that something you wd check too see, i.e., a charity's overhead costs? Yes. Did he? He'll say no b/c he trusted the Clintons but you know he did and he was laundering money like all the rest.

Posted by: Bruce But Not Jenner at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (iQIUe)

97 Nice guys finish last.


/Yogi


Posted by: some random meathead at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (Qgr71)

98 I don't think so. I think Hillary is so seriously done.
Posted by: maddogg at May 22, 2015 03:30 PM (xWW96)


As soon as there's an alternative, yes.

(a) They don't like her, personally or ideologically.
(b) None of them are emotionally tied to her.

Posted by: AmishDude at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (L2xDv)

99 Conservatives are the actual, "Republicans In Name Only."

Posted by: Pedanticarian at May 22, 2015 03:38 PM (uGrec)

100 Ace, you misspelled, "Ambassador Chris Smith."

Posted by: Hillary! Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:38 PM (4CBaM)

101 I'm sorry Congressman, but when you said "server" I thought you were referring to Barack Obama, who should be bringing me my coffee.

#HillaryIsJustLikeYou

Posted by: Sir Hillary Edmund Rodham Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:38 PM (8ZskC)

102 "How to Make Millions in the Television Industry Without Really Trying" by Chelsea Clinton

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:38 PM (7ObY1)

103 Come on Democrats, get a non scummy, non lying grifter to be your nominee.

Can't be done. Their "business" model requires lawyers be in charge of things.

Posted by: AmishDude at May 22, 2015 03:39 PM (L2xDv)

104 Confusion in her eyes that says it all.
She's lost control.
And she's clinging to the nearest passer by,
She's lost control.
And she gave away the secrets of her past,
And said I've lost control again,
And of a voice that told her when and where to act,
She said I've lost control again.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVc29bYIvCM

Posted by: Joy Division at May 22, 2015 03:39 PM (ETUnb)

105 If I were a Jewish opponent of Hillary, I would buy a lot of billboard space with Hillary's pic and a conversation bubble that says ' Damn Jew Bastard ! '

Posted by: Cruzinator at May 22, 2015 03:40 PM (8cSVB)

106 I have to wonder how she's still even in the race.

Is it because no one else besides O'Malley has gotten in and the Dems have to run someone but there is no one else willing or able?

Maybe the Clintons have taken in so much shady money that if she quits now there could be serious ramifications and repercussions from a few of the donors?

An overwhelming will to power that blocks out any reasonable alternative (like just making millions giving speeches she doesn't even have to write)?

The Clintons have to be stopped. I knew before Obama got elected that he would be a disaster but I never imagined the length and breadth of the disaster would be worldwide. If the Clintons get back into the WH, I can't see the end of the disaster. I can't imagine what this country and world will be like.

Posted by: CozMark at May 22, 2015 03:40 PM (waPDG)

107 www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVc29bYIvCM

Posted by: Joy Division at May 22, 2015 03:39 PM (ETUnb)


Yessss! Love that song.

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:40 PM (7ObY1)

108 "Drips of My Father" by Chelsea Clinton

Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:41 PM (7ObY1)

109 Posted by: Huma Abedin, Aide to Hillary Fatima Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:36 PM (P330y)


My nickname for Huma is Hummer.

Posted by: Da Hildebeest at May 22, 2015 03:41 PM (ETUnb)

110
WOW, over at WZ a post on how Hillary called those killed at the embassy by wrong names in her emails.

She is one atrocious person.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:41 PM (ODxAs)

111 I have to wonder how she's still even in the race.

I was unaware she'd filed the paperwork.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 22, 2015 03:42 PM (ZKzrr)

112 When you figure out how many people the Clintons have put in boxes you'll understand why people don't want to cross them....

Posted by: Mr Wizard at May 22, 2015 03:43 PM (hCdMd)

113 How much of Stephanoloulos' money went to pay Sidney Blumenthal?

Posted by: Pappy O'Daniel at May 22, 2015 03:43 PM (oVJmc)

114 Yessss! Love that song.
Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:40 PM (7ObY1)


--I do too, but now I can't help but think of Hitlery when I hear it.

Posted by: logprof at May 22, 2015 03:44 PM (ETUnb)

115 I was unaware she'd filed the paperwork.

Did Fidel Castro need paperwork?

#HillaryIsJustLikeYou

Posted by: Sir Hillary Edmund Rodham Clinton at May 22, 2015 03:44 PM (8ZskC)

116 Blood.on.her.hands.

How is she not in jail, let alone out of the running for president???

Posted by: Lizzy at May 22, 2015 03:45 PM (853JE)

117 >>>[The FBI] said 23 words of the Nov. 18, 2012, message were redacted
from Friday's release of 296 emails totaling 896 pages to protect
information that could harm national security and damage foreign
relations.<<<

You might be a little bit sensitive too, if Miss Diplomacy referred to you as a "shitkicker" who she'd rather not talk to.

Posted by: Fritz at May 22, 2015 03:45 PM (UzPAd)

118 Not to worry Dems, Hillary's charm and warmth will win the day and the Senate and House. She's special and everyone likes, trusts and respects her.

Posted by: Super Creepy Eric Hoteham at May 22, 2015 03:46 PM (oDCMR)

119 >>Sure we talk conservatives talk about it, but I point you to Iran-Contra where nothing even close to what has happened here was a big deal for years.


^^^^THIS^^^^

Posted by: Lizzy at May 22, 2015 03:46 PM (853JE)

120 Off, harpy, elitist bitch-sock.

Posted by: chiefjaybob at May 22, 2015 03:46 PM (4CBaM)

121 110

WOW, over at WZ a post on how Hillary called those killed at the embassy by wrong names in her emails.

She is one atrocious person.



Good Lord.

No words.

Going for a walk. Somewhere without people.

Happy Memorial Day weekend, morons.

Don't get none in ya. Or on ya.

Posted by: some random meathead at May 22, 2015 03:46 PM (Qgr71)

122 Hillary! feeds the five thousand:

When Hillary! heard what had happened, she withdrew by private jet, ducking sniper fire on the tarmac. Hearing of this, the crowds followed her on foot from the towns. When Hillary! landed and saw the large crowd, she had compassion on them and healed their sick with Hillary!Care!

As evening approached, the disciples came to her and said, This is a remote place in flyover unpeopled Jesusland. They roll up the sidewalks at 9pm. It's getting late. Send the crowd away so they can go buy themselves food in the towns.

Hillary! replied, They do not need to go away. They adore me! You give them something to eat so they can adore me longer.

But we only have these five loaves and two fishes, her minions said.

Hillary! then rose and spake to the assembled multitude: Go to the villages and buy yourselves some food. Beg, borrow or steal if you have to. We have no food here. The moose out front should have told you.


Posted by: Count de Monet at May 22, 2015 03:46 PM (JO9+V)

123 "Chris Stevens could not be reached for comment."

Ouch.

Posted by: Marcus T at May 22, 2015 03:48 PM (GGCsk)

124 Probably a good time to ask this again:

Anyone figure out where the $6 Billion of State Dept. funds that Hillary "lost" ended up?

Perhaps this might be determined by looking at her email?!?!

Posted by: Lizzy at May 22, 2015 03:48 PM (M7bUk)

125 "108
"Drips of My Father" by Chelsea Clinton





Posted by: Citizen X at May 22, 2015 03:41 PM (7ObY1)

Preface by Web Hubble?

Posted by: Luap Nor's last brain cell at May 22, 2015 03:48 PM (Vyg9x)

126 So just how did she keep track of 'classified' materials then? Did Huma place the folders in front of her failing eyes, saying "For your eyes only, darling?" Shrill has long had the CRSS according to multiple testimonies she's given.

On to a more serious point -- Multiple security experts claim that her soopersekret email server has been hoovered like Mooch at a wagyu beef social; I'm suuuure that wouldn't ever come back to haunt her when as preezy they threaten to release the whole kaboodle if she doesn't roll over and play dead on some issue of importance to them.

Iran -- "you see nussing about those nukes in our silos, mmkay?"

Russia -- "We want all of Ukraine and your first grandchild."

China -- "Send us your launch codes."

Oh yeah, it'll be greeeeat.

Posted by: GnuBreed at May 22, 2015 03:48 PM (bo7G7)

127 Password 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Posted by: rickb223 Straight, Conservative Clinger at May 22, 2015 03:33 PM (5KY1+)




Actually, it's "HumaMuff69!"

Posted by: Bob at the NSA at May 22, 2015 03:49 PM (nL0sw)

128 I have to wonder how she's still even in the race.

I don't honestly understand it myself. It almost seems like a desperate cry for help by the Democrats who find themselves wholly without valid candidates. This is the best they can do?

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:50 PM (39g3+)

129 Huma told me Hillary's dick is bigger than mine.

Posted by: A. Weiner at May 22, 2015 03:51 PM (ETUnb)

130 >>>Password 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.<<<

I always liked, Username: sa
Password: sa

Posted by: Fritz at May 22, 2015 03:51 PM (UzPAd)

131 11
Who gives a rat's ass. We all know the real damning stuff was deleted months or years ago.

******

Worse. If she is elected president, the Russians and Chinese will use these emails to blackmail her to get anything they want. If you don't think the Russians, Chinese, Israelis, Brits, plus a handful of other countries don't have a copy of every last email that was ever on that unsecured server, you are fucking delusional.

If we had any standards in this country, she would already be disqualified from running for POTUS.

Posted by: Lemmiwinks at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (z+4T3)

132 The thing is... is she really running? She's all over being public, but she hasn't officially declared yet has she?

Is this really going to be a campaign? Or is she just riding the publicity like Sarah Palin did to get money and notice? I know 100% that Trump runs just for the prestige and ego boost. He's on the stage with real important people and from then on he's "presidential candidate" trump who was in debates. Is Hillary doing the same thing?

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (39g3+)

133 Hill,

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (QyBQv)

134 Hill,

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (QyBQv)

135 Why do Democrats push gun control when they love giving guns to criminals and terrorists in Mexico and Benghazi?

Posted by: Jerry Brown at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (XO6WW)

136 I don't honestly understand it myself. It almost seems like a desperate cry for help by the Democrats who find themselves wholly without valid candidates. This is the best they can do?
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:50 PM (39g3+)

I'm gettin' warmed up. As FDR said before the Charge of the Light Brigade, I have not yet begun to fight.

Posted by: Joe Biden at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (fIp5S)

137 ~
User Name : user
Password : password

Posted by: Mr Wizard at May 22, 2015 03:53 PM (hCdMd)

138 Who gives a rat's ass. We all know the real damning stuff was deleted months or years ago.

someone on twitter noted this: if this kind of stuff is coming out of what she didn't delete... what was in those emails???

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:53 PM (39g3+)

139 128 I have to wonder how she's still even in the race.

I don't honestly understand it myself. It almost seems like a desperate cry for help by the Democrats who find themselves wholly without valid candidates. This is the best they can do?
-----------------------
When you next two best prospects are an Indian Princess and a body building guitar player, maybe a granny with totes cash is the smart move.

Posted by: Super Creepy Eric Hoteham at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (oDCMR)

140 I want to see the knives come out for Hillary after she loses. I have a feeling some not-so-nice people have given her money, and they won't let her keep it if she can't deliver.

Posted by: kathysaysso at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (fMQoG)

141 With the Clintons I wouldn't be surprised if she sold her passwords to the highest bidder.

Posted by: Bigby's Silver Hand at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (3ZtZW)

142 hoovered like Mooch at a wagyu beef social

Nice.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (ZKzrr)

143 Hillary said she never SENT classified information on her private email account. She never said she didn't RECEIVE any.

Posted by: Anthony's Weiner at May 22, 2015 03:55 PM (5fSr7)

144 Hill,

I'll be in Benghazi next week to close that deal with the Turkish Consul on the transfer of you-know-what, for you-know-who (wink, wink).

Hugs,
Chris

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 22, 2015 03:55 PM (QyBQv)

145 Mrs. Clinton, can you tell me why the right wing hate machine and it's Republican puppet masters insist upon constantly engaging in character assassination and outright lies in an attempt to sabotage your campaign?

Posted by: Real Everyday American at May 22, 2015 03:55 PM (YFFpo)

146 140
I want to see the knives come out for Hillary after she loses. I have a
feeling some not-so-nice people have given her money, and they won't let
her keep it if she can't deliver. Posted by: kathysaysso at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (fMQoG)



Accidents happen.

Posted by: Hairy Reed at May 22, 2015 03:55 PM (uGrec)

147 o/t - Trump is interesting. Now I'm not a fan -- have never watched more then a couple minutes of his shows. But I pay attention to what he says, and doesn't say -- because sometimes there is just as much information in what you don't see. Who he attacks, who he leaves alone. Big 'tell' is that.

I consider him an 'America first' kinda guy which is in seriously short supply in the WH and Senate. I have no clue as to what his endgame is, but he could be either a spoiler or game-changer. But we better pay a little more attention to him. Hillary is polishing the chrome on the Scooby Doo while it's parked in a handicapped parking spot.

Posted by: SE Pa Moron at May 22, 2015 03:55 PM (xQX/f)

148 Lets be fair to Hillary Clinton. She raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the poor, which she then kept for herself.

Posted by: billy sastard at May 22, 2015 03:15 PM (VDovR)


Hey weren't Hillary! and Bill poor when they left the White House? So she's like totally cool with keeping it. You Rethuglicans and your phoney scandals.

Posted by: Teh MFM at May 22, 2015 03:56 PM (rNWnF)

149 "Chris Stevens could not be reached for comment."

I been on the Internet a long time. That's the coldest damned thing I ever read.

Posted by: Head Football Coach Howard Schnellenberger at May 22, 2015 03:56 PM (fMSaY)

150 I want to see the knives come out for Hillary after she loses.

My guess is they have too much dirt on too many people. People aren't gonna turn on her out of fear of what might accidentally get leaked.

Remember all those journalists complaining about their emails being hacked and the white house monitoring them? Hillary had access to that in State. I suspect they would rather not dig too deeply in the media either. Its like that ghastly Jimmy Saville case; people knew, KNEW but did nothing because well, they were part of the crime too.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 03:56 PM (39g3+)

151 Why do Democrats push gun control when they love giving guns to criminals and terrorists in Mexico and Benghazi?

Posted by: Jerry Brown at May 22, 2015 03:52 PM (XO6WW)




Because they share the common goals of killing you. Dems also want you not having a way to defend yourself, thus further contributing to the goal they share with the Islamists and LaRaza cartels.

Posted by: Bob at the NSA at May 22, 2015 03:57 PM (nL0sw)

152 When you next two best prospects are an Indian Princess and a body building guitar player, maybe a granny with totes cash is the smart move.
Posted by: Super Creepy Eric Hoteham at May 22, 2015 03:54 PM (oDCMR)

--Carcetti, the tricky mayor of Baltimore portrayed in The Wire, was inspired at least a little by O'Malley. I was amused when I discovered that the same actor plays a conniving character in Game of Thrones.

Posted by: logprof at May 22, 2015 03:58 PM (fIp5S)

153 Back to the definition of "is."

But half of all voters love her and will pull the lever for her.

Posted by: the littl shyning man at May 22, 2015 03:59 PM (U6f54)

154 "When can they file a RICO case against the Clinton Crime Family?"


Uh, "they" are the Justice Department. Ain't gonna happen. Evah.

Posted by: bergerbilder at May 22, 2015 04:00 PM (+jijM)

155 Hillary! Because Unindicted.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 22, 2015 04:03 PM (QyBQv)

156 I don't think but maybe 10% of the voters actually love Hillary Clinton. But close to 50% will vote for the non-Republican no matter who it is or what they do. For this kind of person, the worst possible Democrat who is totally guilty of the most reprehensible things conceivable is still better than the best Republican.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 04:03 PM (39g3+)

157 Get over it, It's Hillary's turn to be president!

Posted by: Colin at May 22, 2015 04:05 PM (rOQws)

158 >>My guess is they have too much dirt on too many people. People aren't gonna turn on her out of fear of what might accidentally get leaked.


Yep, I'm starting to think that the "foundation" is really a big hub not only for payoffs, but for networking - getting people in touch via the Clinton connections. Think that's why so many media folks have been involved - got to meet VIPs (why else would Steph and other MSM'ers donate so dang much?).

And if it can be used to connect people, then it can also be used to *disconnect* people who either don't pay to play or piss off the Clintons.
Excellent way to keep people in line, no?

Posted by: Lizzy at May 22, 2015 04:05 PM (rzUBs)

159 Mrs. Clinton, what about Mitt Romney's gaffes?

Posted by: The Media and nothing but the Media at May 22, 2015 04:06 PM (RFeQD)

160 The Romanian intelligence agency will give us what they have from her server. Eventually, we'll get whatever she put on that server. She might as well have posted it in Times Square.

Why is she not in handcuffs?

Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at May 22, 2015 04:07 PM (iAUf+)

161 At least once a week Hillary clogs the toilet in the Mystery Machine. Bitch to clear it out.

Posted by: Team Hillary! at May 22, 2015 04:07 PM (fIp5S)

162 He'll say no b/c he trusted the Clintons but you know he did and he was laundering money like all the rest.
Posted by: Bruce But Not Jenner at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (iQIUe)
_________________________

Not so much "money laundering" as "influence purchasing" in dear Georgie's case. He once said that nobody gives money to the Clintons without expecting a quid pro quo. The quo Georgie was expecting for his quid was influence -- he wanted to get big interviews and have juicy leaks flowing freely from the Clinton camp to his camp, so he could justify that $100 million+ paycheck he was getting from the network.

Those corporations and foreign governments that "give" so generously to the Clinton Foundation are purchasing a different kind of influence. They want to influence the operation of the federal government in their favor -- tax breaks, licensing approvals, closed investigations, special visas -- there are all sorts of "favors" you can get from the government, if you grease the right skids with the right amounts of money. And having a current Secretary of State, or even a future President, on your payroll is just a good business decision!

The Clintons have lots of different types of influence to sell. Only problem is, what they're selling is not theirs, and selling that kind of stuff is both illegal and immoral. And selling it while pretending to be a charity is downright obscene.

But they're Democratic icons and darlings of the liberal media, so it doesn't matter how many crimes they commit. They will never be held accountable. Not in this life.

Posted by: TrivialPursuer at May 22, 2015 04:07 PM (lmdHn)

163 Get over it, It's Hillary's turn to be president!

That worked perfectly for us!

Posted by: Dole, McCain, Romney at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (39g3+)

164 emails? DuHHHH
Historic First Woman!!!

Posted by: The 52% at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (+kznc)

165 Yeah, lots of buffers in The Family.

Posted by: Chel-Chel at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (uGrec)

166 In a sane world, Mrs. Clinton would have been sentenced to life in front of a firing squad for this.

But hey, how apropos is it that a president who hates this country might be succeeded by an actual traitor?

Hell, handbasket, USA...no assembly required.

Posted by: SGTYork at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (/yNLK)

167 why else would Steph and other MSM'ers donate so dang much?

Well as Steffy said on The Daily Show, "nobody gives to the Clintons without expecting quid quo pro."

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (39g3+)

168 LMAO there's an LFL team called the Atlanta Steam.

Posted by: logprof at May 22, 2015 04:08 PM (fIp5S)

169 The thing is, if all the voters cared about was "first woman" then it would be a neck-and-neck race between Hillary and Fiorino.

Clearly, that's not their real interest.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 04:09 PM (39g3+)

170 I'm a big LFL fan.

Posted by: Hitlery at May 22, 2015 04:09 PM (fIp5S)

171 User Name : user
Password : password


That's the same combination I have on my luggage.

-President Skroob

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 22, 2015 04:10 PM (0HooB)

172 Not only an LFL fan, but a big fan of steamed clams.

Posted by: Hitlery at May 22, 2015 04:12 PM (fIp5S)

173 Man you almost need a program to keep up. Scandal a day. Chelsea didn't fall far from that turd tree. Family of grifters who want to rule the USA. This really speaks poorly for our future...

Posted by: just saying at May 22, 2015 04:12 PM (wkuqO)

174 Uh, "they" are the Justice Department. Ain't gonna happen. Evah.

Posted by: bergerbilder at May 22, 2015 04:00 PM


Not just the DoJ. There's Congress, which is so consumed by its desire to toady to Choom Boy that they have forgotten everything else, including the Constitution, the law and, oh yes, the "people" they allegedly serve.

As a little cherry on Shrillery's sundae, add the Konservative Keyboard Kommandos, who almost to a man/woman/other will squabble for days on end about the relative merits of various Founding Father's views on governance, but will never look up from their monitors to notice the blatant illegality and treasonous activities of the current Governing Elites.

She has it made in the proverbial shade. She wins the nomination, she gets richer. She loses, and she gets richer.

Choom Boy will step in and save us from the agony of the '16 election by declaring himself President For Life. He has our best interests at heart, after all.

Posted by: MrScribbler at May 22, 2015 04:12 PM (P8YHq)

175 I'm not particularly fond of Leona Helmsley or Martha Steward but they served jail time for what amounted to jay walking violations compared to what Hillary is doing.

Posted by: Ken at May 22, 2015 04:12 PM (LXJ1e)

176 >>When you next two best prospects are an Indian Princess and a body building guitar player



George Lynch has announced?

Posted by: Garrett at May 22, 2015 04:13 PM (Y663r)

177
Even worse than knowing about the poor security situation is that when the attack occurred they did nothing. CNN and the NYT got there before they did.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 22, 2015 03:37 PM (ODxAs)







Nothing would have been an improvement. They prohibited anyone from lifting a finger to help the people they abandoned. The ones that ran to the sound of gunfire had to VIOLATE ORDERS to effect a rescue.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 22, 2015 04:14 PM (lpeQC)

178 She has it made in the proverbial shade. She wins the nomination, she gets richer. She loses, and she gets richer.


We're obviously in the wrong business.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 22, 2015 04:14 PM (0HooB)

179 Noob!

Posted by: HH at May 22, 2015 04:14 PM (Ce4DF)

180 176 >>When you next two best prospects are an Indian Princess and a body building guitar player

George Lynch has announced?
Posted by: Garrett at May 22, 2015 04:13 PM (Y663r)


I thought it sounded like Rita Coolidge and Kris Kristofferson.

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 22, 2015 04:15 PM (St6BJ)

181 >>I been on the Internet a long time. That's the coldest damned thing I ever read.



Been in the comments dozens if times.

Posted by: Garrett at May 22, 2015 04:15 PM (Y663r)

182 The Russian government bought the ISP Hillary used for her private server.

Why would the Russian government want to own a small ISP, you might ask? Uh, because.

PS: we have all the emails carefully preserved

Posted by: Russian Foreign Intelligence at May 22, 2015 04:15 PM (bIFFs)

183 George Lynch has announced?

No no no.

Matt "Guitar" Murphy.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 22, 2015 04:15 PM (0HooB)

184 Personally, I think it's THE.AWESOME. that we can now officially sweep this under that rug bulging with all the other DemoKKKrat scandals that will be ignored by LIV voters, unprosecuted by the broken legal system, and unreported on by the "Watchdog" media........

Posted by: Mickey Shwarma at May 22, 2015 04:16 PM (sCHw2)

185 We're obviously in the wrong business.

This might be something. But what kind of hops to use?
http://is.gd/A7npwy

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 22, 2015 04:16 PM (ZKzrr)

186 George Lynch has announced?

Posted by: Garrett at May 22, 2015 04:13 PM


I was thinking Putin....

Posted by: MrScribbler at May 22, 2015 04:16 PM (P8YHq)

187 Been in the comments dozens if times.
Posted by: Garrett at May 22, 2015 04:15 PM (Y663r)

--and for years, at that.

Posted by: logprof at May 22, 2015 04:16 PM (ETUnb)

188 But hey, how apropos is it that a president who hates this country might be succeeded by an actual traitor?


Excuse me, actual traitor already reporting for duty.

Posted by: Secretariat of State Horseface at May 22, 2015 04:17 PM (HxSPy)

189 I'm not particularly fond of Leona Helmsley or Martha Steward but they served jail time for what amounted to jay walking violations compared to what Hillary is doing.
Posted by: Ken
-----------------

Tell me about it.

Posted by: Dinesh D'souza at May 22, 2015 04:19 PM (QyBQv)

190 LOL!! Forget it, You Guys, I have already won the 2016 POTUS Sweepstakes for her....... *scratch, scratch, scratch*

Hey, does anybody have some Flea-B-Gone I could use? Anybody?

Posted by: Shrillary's Vagina at May 22, 2015 04:19 PM (sCHw2)

191 I'm not particularly fond of Leona Helmsley or Martha Steward but they served jail time for what amounted to jay walking violations compared to what Hillary is doing.
Posted by: Ken
-----------------

Tell me about it.
Posted by: Dinesh D'souza
---------------------

It's almost as if there are two standards.

Posted by: Scooter Libby at May 22, 2015 04:20 PM (QyBQv)

192 Matt "Guitar" Murphy I would vote for.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 22, 2015 04:20 PM (39g3+)

193 Why isn't this nasty crone going to prison?

Oh, wait. Because Clinton.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 22, 2015 04:23 PM (FsuaD)

194 The USGS is reportingcurious seismic readings of 8.0 eminating from a gravesite in Yorba Linda, California.

The site is reportedly the grave of a former U.S. President.

There appears to be a rectangular object underground that is spinning at approximately 1,000 RPM.

Eyewitnesses also report ghostly laughter eminating from the rectangular object.

Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at May 22, 2015 04:24 PM (iAUf+)

195 WTF?

Posted by: Gen. Petraeus at May 22, 2015 04:26 PM (iAUf+)

196 Hey, could You Guys put Jebbie "Democrat Lite" Bush on your ticket as candidate? Please?

With baboons like trumpetdaddy working the inside of the GOPe, the Media/Academia Bullhorn in the back-pocket of Shrillary's red pantsuit, and 10+ million illegal Mexicans on the Democrat Voter-Roster, I.CAN'T.LOSE.

Posted by: Shrillary's Vagina at May 22, 2015 04:31 PM (sCHw2)

197
I'm not particularly fond of Leona Helmsley or Martha Steward but they
served jail time for what amounted to jay walking violations compared to
what Hillary is doing.

Posted by: Ken

-----------------



Tell me about it.

Posted by: Dinesh D'souza

---------------------



It's almost as if there are two standards.

Posted by: Scooter Libby at May 22, 2015 04:20 PM (QyBQv)

They wouldn't even show me my own movie when I was in solitary.

Posted by: Nakoula Nakoula at May 22, 2015 04:33 PM (HxSPy)

198

redefining every action and every word in the dictionary

the CYA Strategy of the Dems live on

Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 22, 2015 04:49 PM (zqrZE)

199 But of course we are "Going To Jail the Maker of the Video".
Cause that's who's really culpable.

Posted by: simplemind at May 22, 2015 04:56 PM (BTnAK)

200 The Guess Who nailed it years ago. Shes Come Undone

Posted by: TheThinMan at May 22, 2015 05:14 PM (+PEBZ)

201 Now, to update the lyrics...

Posted by: TheThinMan at May 22, 2015 05:15 PM (+PEBZ)

202 Going by this, this Reines guy is a sociopath:

http://tinyurl.com/kvvxr63

(Gawker link)

Posted by: Pappy O'Daniel at May 22, 2015 05:21 PM (oVJmc)

203 phssssswwwshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...Those homos demanded equal time and service need to shakeup and simply fuck-off..oops wrong thread..Swssssssssssss...

Posted by: stephen livingston seagull at May 22, 2015 07:05 PM (liTfe)

204 Some skepticism is called for here about when and why information was classified. Generally information can be classified for two reasons. Either someone with Original Classification Authority ("OCA") (generally a very senior government official, who is formally designated as such) determines that something warrants classification on a one-off basis, or it is derivatively classified based on classification guidance signed off on by the same OCA. If SECSTATE (an OCA) determined that something was NOT classified, it would be odd for another OCA to countermand that by classifying it. On the other hand, it is possible that there was OCA approved classification guidance properly classifying the material and that guidance was ignored or countermanded (implicitly or explicitly) by SECSTATE. Similarly, it is possible that someone (an OCA or not) has just decided to slap a classification label on this. If someone wants to push, the demand is for the classification justification. Was this an OCA determination or a derivative classification based upon existing guidance, and in either case what specifically was the justification? If it isn't properly classified by either an OCA or an approved classification guide, then the classification will not stand a FOIA lawsuit vigorously pursued because the information is not actually classified If the information was appropriately classified, then there is a real question why it was on an unclassified non-governmental server.

Posted by: Hmm. at May 22, 2015 11:06 PM (LR5zv)

(Jump to top of page)






Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.033 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.012 seconds, 213 records returned.
Page size 110 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.



MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!

Real Clear Politics
Gallup
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat