Leftist Media Which Censored Charlie Hebdo Cartoons Is Now Goofing on "Fox News" For Allegedly Censoring Breasts From Picasso Painting

A Picasso sold for big money at auction and so it's kind of news. $174 million big.

The leftist media has been attributing this act of (minor) censorship to "Fox News," despite the fact that "Fox 5" appears right in the bottom corner of their pictures -- that is, it's a local affiliate.

Here's the New Yorker's art critic:

How sexually sick are conservatives & Fox News? They blurred parts of the Picasso painting. #SickMinds pic.twitter.com/5PGw5h5iBs
— Jerry Saltz (@jerrysaltz) May 13, 2015

He just ignores the "Fox 5" in order to spread The Narrative.

Local Fox affiliate broadcasts something stupid. Lefty news orgs run to the presses with inaccurate "Fox News" pic.twitter.com/GxGtqhmCSM
— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) May 14, 2015

But certainly FoxNews would censor it, if it covered this story, right?

Wrong. Fox News proper did cover it-- uncensored. Boobies intact.

.@lachlan Here's how Fox News Channel aired it Tuesday, for instance. pic.twitter.com/xWPPN8YV1L
— Vince Coglianese (@TheDCVince) May 14, 2015

Mother Jones then gets super-funny by showing other paintings with the dirty parts blurred out.

While these hens hector Fox News about censorship that didn't happen -- one searches in vain for the Charlie Hebdo cartoons on the New Yorker, or Mother Jones.

Almost the entirety of the "mainstream" -- actually, leftwing media-- either embargoed the Charlie cartoons completely, or cropped/censored them so that none of the Forbidden Art would offend their readers.

Deferring to standard, aeons-old prudery about the naked female breast? Unacceptable.

Deferring to radical Islamists' murder-enforced demands that Mohammad never be depicted? Mandatory, the leftwing know-nothings figure, but can't quite explain why, except by invoking the magic words they think explains everything in the world:

Because Racism.

Posted by: Ace at 04:43 PM

Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 They are totally aware that Fox doesn't really provide a ton of oversight to the fox affiliates right?

Less than NBC I'd suspect based on watching them.

Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) rogue bioethicst at May 14, 2015 05:09 PM (HDwDg)

2 Oh and First I guess, I'll go get the others.

Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) rogue bioethicst at May 14, 2015 05:09 PM (HDwDg)

3 Trifecta?

Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) rogue bioethicst at May 14, 2015 05:09 PM (HDwDg)

4 These people suck. They really do.

Posted by: thathalfrican at May 14, 2015 05:09 PM (7bnE6)

5 Huh!

Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:10 PM (NbyPU)

6 Meh. I have seen better in a Sears Catalog.

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:10 PM (ecDRv)

7 Local channels may have to worry about standards and practices more than a cable channel like fox news. I have no idea what the rules are for that sort of thing.

Also, Fox5 is apparently in NY, so make fun of the liberal yankee station all you like, folks.

Posted by: Lea at May 14, 2015 05:10 PM (lIU4e)

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:11 PM (ecDRv)

9 What's really sick is spending $174 Million dollars for a Picasso.

Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:11 PM (NbyPU)

10 Proper censorship of Picasso's late works is to cover them completely with a black cloth.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:11 PM (39g3+)

11 The little 9-year-old girl that the Prophet Mahomet married didn't have big boobehs when she got married, so what's the big deal?

Posted by: Furious George at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (UlJ3l)

12 Shut Up! they explained.

Posted by: Grump928(c) at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (evdj2)

13 Did Fox provide a trigger warning for the boobs? I'd hate to think anyone missed them.

Posted by: pep at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (oIEE1)

14 Why did they censor the painting? Did it have the Ten Commandments written on it?

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (o68RC)

15 Not unless you sold it Idly. Then you're giddy as hell.

Posted by: thathalfrican at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (7bnE6)

16 So is it 'boobs' or 'bewbs'?

Posted by: Weasel at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (e3bId)

17 Funniest thing? When I checked which Fox 5 it was, expecting it to be in some flyover part of the country, I discovered it was "Fox 5 News, the New-York based Fox affiliate."

http://mashable.com/2015/05/14/picasso-fox-news-censor/

Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2015 05:13 PM (RWGcK)

18 So is it 'boobs' or 'bewbs'?
Posted by: Weasel at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (e3bId)

*thumbs through AoSHQ style guide"

"Bewbs"

Right there on page 57

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (V+kmg)

19 There are a few websites with boobs on them apparently.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (o68RC)

20 Icky tittays should be censored.

Posted by: John Boner in Assless Chaps at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (8W5zZ)

21 MOAR BOOBEHS!

Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (VAsIq)

22 So is it 'boobs' or 'bewbs'?

Posted by: Weasel at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM

I believe the AoSHQ Style Guide says "yes."

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (h4vJk)

23 I'm totally ok with Fox blurring out Bruce Jenner's boobs, or whatever he calls the slabs of flesh-colored goo stapled to his pecs.

Posted by: Citizen Cake at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (ppaKI)

24 How many minority, inner city, disadvantaged children with desperate single mothers can you properly educate with $174 Million dollars.

A Picasso never fed a hungry child.

It is just tragic that so many rich people are so concerned about their status that they would outbid other rich people for the right to claim ownership of a piece of canvas with bright colors on it while poor inner city children grow up in poverty.

Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (NbyPU)

25 I am Pablo Picasso's tits.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:15 PM (o68RC)

26 PRO TIP: The nipples should light up. Also, toss in a water wheel somewhere

Posted by: Thomas Kinkade, Painter of Light at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM (8ZskC)

27 I am Pablo Picasso's tits.

That's a hell of a resume bullet.

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM (V+kmg)

28 Producer, put a burqa on that Picasso graphic, stat!

Posted by: Bill O'Really at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM (1CroS)

29 Je suis Pablo.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM (o68RC)

30
I thought Fox Force 5 had Uma's boobs?

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (lpeQC)

31 Man, that is one ugly piece of shit of a painting.

Posted by: Chris M at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (k3w9p)

32 I am Pablo Picasso's tits.

That's a hell of a resume bullet.

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM

But only when it's chilly.

Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (h4vJk)

33 A Picasso never fed a hungry child.

Neither did the Clinton Foundation, apparently.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (8ZskC)

34 I am Pablo Picasso's tits.

I'm just an ordinary boob.

When you look at his earlier work, you can see that Picasso had rare, immense talent. Then he threw it all away and painted trash that people pretend to like. Its a big emperor's new clothes scam, with everyone looking at the other guy to see how they're supposed to react to the latest atrocity by someone claiming to be an artist.

Cue Dire Straits "Gallery"

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (39g3+)

35 Henceforth, the terms "Jesus" should be accompanied by air quotes.

Posted by: AP Style Guide at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (yUSO1)

36 How many minority, inner city, disadvantaged children with desperate single mothers can you properly educate with $174 Million dollars.
Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (NbyPU)

None, if we have anything to say about it.

Posted by: National Education Association at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (V+kmg)

37 The price woulda topped $200 mil if he'd added some melting clocks.

Posted by: Salvador Dali at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (8W5zZ)

38 and....

Is it not porn, because it is famous? and Old?

I've got some Eutruscan pottery......

Posted by: Hysterium at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (qh617)

39 But only when it's chilly.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (h4vJk)

ISWYDT

Posted by: National Education Association at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (V+kmg)

40 33 Or even the school lunch program lately.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (o68RC)

41 I get hungry sometimes.

Posted by: Chelsea Clinton at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (8ZskC)

42
When you look at his earlier work, you can see that Picasso had rare, immense talent. Then he threw it all away and painted trash that people pretend to like.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:17 PM (39g3+)

World Class Art World Trolling

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (lpeQC)

43 Reminds me of the Britcom Allo Allo.

Posted by: Ronda Rousey at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (xkSSa)

44 It's just such hypocrisy to pay so much to re-enforce the heteronormative white man's patriarchy while minority women have to struggle to find adequate reproductive health solutions.

Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (NbyPU)

45 41
I get hungry sometimes.

Posted by: Chelsea Clinton at May 14, 2015 05:18 PM (8ZskC)

*offers a bag of dicks*

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (ecDRv)

46 My report was fake but accurate.

Posted by: Jerry Saltz at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (FCsIb)

47 Sean Bannion: *thumbs through AoSHQ style guide*

'Bewbs'

Right there on page 57"

So someone finally unstuck the pages? Brave soul.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (1CroS)

48 That there is some lame shit alright. But lame and cowardly is what the MFM does these days.

Posted by: maddogg at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (xWW96)

49 26 PRO TIP: The nipples should light up. Also, toss in a water wheel somewhere

Posted by: Thomas Kinkade, Painter of Light at May 14, 2015 05:16 PM (8ZskC)

and.... dogs.... and Poker.... and a velvet Elvis!

Now... THAT would be Art!

Posted by: BB Wolf at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (qh617)

50 Yeah, judging from what I see on Fox 7 Austin, "conservative" isn't a requirement for being an affiliate.

Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (J0IP0)

51 I get hungry sometimes.

Have some butter.

Posted by: David Frum at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (evdj2)

52
*offers a bag of dicks*
Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (ecDRv)

Thank you. Don't mind if I do.

Posted by: Reggie Love at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (V+kmg)

53 "Man, that is one ugly piece of shit of a painting."

Oh, you silly uncultured rube (titters into his wine glass)

Posted by: effete art snob at May 14, 2015 05:20 PM (oIEE1)

54 Is it really too much to ask these idiots in the media to actually look at the images they're screeching about? Or to use The Google Machine?

Posted by: pookysgirl can walk! (in a pool) at May 14, 2015 05:20 PM (dCUzJ)

55 #SickMinds referred to the new TV pilot I recently wrote, hoping I could publicize it. Its autobiographical.

Posted by: Jerry Saltz at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (FCsIb)

56 Did Mother Jones cover the Giant Penis installation at Burning Man?

Posted by: Just Axin at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (yUSO1)

57 I get hungry sometimes.

Posted by: Chelsea Clinton

You're still here? I fed you for years--go home to your damn "husband"!

Posted by: Hillary(!) at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (VAsIq)

58 So someone finally unstuck the pages? Brave soul.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (1CroS)

Just threw it in The Barrel for a few seconds.

It's an all-purpose solvent. Who knew?

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (V+kmg)

59 Mother Jones then gets super-funny by showing other paintings with the dirty parts blurred out.

Amateur Webzine Slate did as well. http://is.gd/Y13Ecw I lol'd at the Rothko, but the rest just reminded me how they spooged all over the "reactionary anti-Islam[sic]" free speech event in Texas but refused to show any of the pedoMo images.

The plant on my desk has more self-awareness.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (ZKzrr)

60 Ace,

You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.

Posted by: The Uncensored Hat at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (7YlUk)

61 Kind of looks like a Queen out of a deck of cards.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (o68RC)

62 that tool also gets a blue check mark.

Posted by: joe-impeachin44 at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (ZtH3P)

63 You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.

Posted by: The Uncensored Hat

Excellent idea, Hat.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:22 PM (/Ho8c)

64 Funniest thing? When I checked which Fox 5 it was,
expecting it to be in some flyover part of the country, I discovered it
was "Fox 5 News, the New-York based Fox affiliate."
http://mashable.com/2015/05/14/picasso-fox-news-censor/ Posted by: Y-not at May 14, 2015 05:13 PM (RWGcK)

And we totes appreciate it! The less icky mammary glands we see the better. But if you try to censor that penis dress from the Met Gala we will soooooo cut a b****.

Posted by: Gay Hipsters in NY, hipstering at May 14, 2015 05:22 PM (yRwC8)

65 Boobehs in a Picasso.

How can anyone tell?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 05:22 PM (0HooB)

66 Ace,

You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.

Posted by: The Uncensored Hat

And you can define "artistic" as loosely as you want.

Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 14, 2015 05:22 PM (VAsIq)

67 At least they didn't melt.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (o68RC)

68
58 So someone finally unstuck the pages? Brave soul.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (1CroS)

Just threw it in The Barrel for a few seconds.

It's an all-purpose solvent. Who knew?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (V+kmg)

The cure is worse than the disease....

Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (z/Ubi)

69
Saltz = Putz.

This from a group with the mindset that killing a baby at any stage of development is okay and 'Rape-Lying" is defendable.

Posted by: Cheri at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (oiNtH)

70 61 Kind of looks like a Queen out of a deck of cards.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (o68RC)

Hmmm.... wonder why we don't have Suicide Queens... like we have suicide Jacks and Kings...

Sexist?

Posted by: BB Wolf at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (qh617)

71 My attorney has reminded me that the phrase "How sexually sick are conservatives & Fox News?" is copywrited and is the centerpiece of some new coffee table art books my partner is making. Please do not reproduce this phrase.

Posted by: Jerry Saltz at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (FCsIb)

72 I would define "artistic" as "huge", in this particular case.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (/Ho8c)

73 Posted by: Bandersnatch at May 14, 2015 04:54 PM (JtwS4)

if you're lurking... yeah, would have been nice but i had to get the hell out of dodge. that state was driving me nuts.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (AkOaV)

74 Boobehs in a Picasso.

How can anyone tell?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 05:22 PM (0HooB)

There was a picasso in there?

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (ecDRv)

75 You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.

With Mohammed pasties.

Posted by: Grump928(c) makes up for his lack of vision with volume of fire at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (evdj2)

76
60 Ace,

You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.
Posted by: The Uncensored Hat at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (7YlUk)

CAC did that. His posts got pulled down.

Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (z/Ubi)

77 Wow - must be nothing else going on in the world to cause outrage, huh?
Just ignore ISIS kidnapping young women and forcing them to convert and marry jihadis.

No, we need to make fun of Fox over boobies in paintings.

Got it.

Posted by: Lizzy at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (2TN4k)

78 Did anyone at Mother Jones denounce CNN? /rhetorical
http://is.gd/XoO4gq

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (ZKzrr)

79 14 Why did they censor the painting? Did it have the Ten Commandments written on it?
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:12 PM (o68RC)

No. It was hanging in the Capitol behind a Reid presser.

Posted by: BuddyPC at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (jfUIE)

80 Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:21 PM (ZKzrr

"Simpsons did it."

Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) rogue bioethicst at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (HDwDg)

81 In honor of this censorship, I think we should have superfluous boobies on every thread all day tomorrow.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (AkOaV)

82 Bewbs.

Heh.

Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (LA7Cm)

83 CAC did that. His posts got pulled down.
Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (z/Ubi)

really?

even if it was artfully done?

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (AkOaV)

84 In honor of this censorship, I think we should have superfluous boobies on every thread all day tomorrow.
Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (AkOaV)

Seconded.

All in favor?

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (V+kmg)

85 Right there on page 57

Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:14 PM (V+kmg)

You must have an old copy. Mine has it on every page, 1 through 57.

Posted by: MTF, SMOD is my personal savior at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (FCsIb)

86 CAC did that. His posts got pulled down.

Posted by: Buzzion

Yeah, I fondly remember some of his "art" posts. Something about some sort of statement about something, plus nice jugs.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (/Ho8c)

87 Did the mental giant stop to think the issue may have been that you can't show bewbs on broadcast tv?

Posted by: Lauren at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (MYCIw)

88 The plant on my desk has more self-awareness.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier

Feeeeeed me, Seymour!

Posted by: Audrey, self-aware plant at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (VAsIq)

89 Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (V+kmg)

I'd say its unanimous.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (AkOaV)

90 Hmmm.... wonder why we don't have Suicide Queens... like we have suicide Jacks and Kings...

The queens are driving the guys into suicide.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (39g3+)

91 You must fight against censorship by showing artistic boobies in your posts.

With Mohammed pasties.

Posted by: Grump928(c) makes up for his lack of vision with volume of fire at May 14, 2015 05:23 PM (evdj2)

Or Mohammed pictures covered up with boobies...

Posted by: The Uncensored Hat at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (7YlUk)

92 If I want to see a boob, I turn on ABC's "This Week..."

Thank you. I'll be here all week. Try the veal and Valu-Rite.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 14, 2015 05:25 PM (1CroS)

93
Wait.

Some cocksucker named Jeery Saltz, who is posed with sexual predator Bill Clinton, says it's "sexually sick" to blur out naked breasts??

Posted by: Soothsayer at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (ss4qG)

94 Yeah, I fondly remember some of his "art" posts. Something about some sort of statement about something, plus nice jugs.

Weren't there green painted boobs at one point?

Posted by: Grump928(c) makes up for his lack of vision with volume of fire at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (evdj2)

95 Abstract paintings like Picasso's give me a headache. My eyes strain and try to make sense of the perspectives and they try to see what it normally looks like...

Blam, monumental headache.

Posted by: rd at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (r2TIL)

96 Are we Tea Party Taliban stoning anyone today?

Posted by: MTF, SMOD is my personal savior at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (FCsIb)

97 Did they make fun of the New York Daily News?
http://is.gd/azugfh

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (ZKzrr)

98 Would the MSM show drawings of Muhammed with boobs?

Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (J0IP0)

99 Weren't there green painted boobs at one point?

Posted by: Grump928(c)

Oh, yes. Yes, there were. Very green.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (/Ho8c)

100
ace, as you yourself have said in different ways and different times, the intellectual elite is neither. Added to which they are just small, small little creatures, as people.

So four out of six Gulf heads of state are snubbing the SLG's "summit" (S-hitty L-ittle G-rifter)? Ha!

You youngsters really can't appreciate what an astonishing - and, of course, appalling and infuriating - distance we have fallen in such a short time. Well, maybe you can, come to think of it.

Even before Iraq, completely unimaginable any significant Arab leader would snub Dubya. After Iraq, of course, not a chance. Strong horse and all that.

Oh, it gets better. The SLG botched both the Saudi rep's introduction and his reference to King Saud at his dwarf summit.

Posted by: rhomboid at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (afQnV)

101
Seconded.

All in favor?

Aye!

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (0HooB)

102 Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (ZKzrr)

oh god! no one wants to see THAT uncensored.

Oh. God.

$1.7 Million?!?!

Wow.

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (AkOaV)

103 There's nothing superferlous about boobs. They are essential. They are supercalifragilisticexpealladocious.

Posted by: Count de Monet at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (JO9+V)

104
A cocksucker, who has probably had many cocks in his mouth and anus, comes up with the hashtag #sickminds because of this??

#jerrysaltzisacocksucker

Posted by: Soothsayer at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (ss4qG)

105 Let me get this straight. According to the legacy media, al'Jazeera blacking out a woman's face is just cultural, but one obscure outlet blurring some mammarian protruberences is proof that conservatives are all sexually damaged?

Got it.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (39g3+)

106 do we know that the censor wasn't a moslem?

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (Uk9e2)

107 CAC did that. His posts got pulled down.
Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (z/Ubi)

remember the Korean(?) sex park ONT?

Posted by: rd at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (r2TIL)

108 Do those uptight, repressed MoJo writers wear clothes to work?

And, btw, here is Mother Herself, flashing her tits (Totally SFW) http://tinyurl.com/mnt88d7

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (n6Nt0)

109
CAC did that. His posts got pulled down.
Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 05:24 PM (z/Ubi)

Don't you have to actually be wearing pants before someone can pull them down?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Oh. Posts.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (lpeQC)

110 When you are more worried about about the alleged sexual illness of FOX News while ignoring the real atrocities sexual and otherwise of ISIS you have a real problem.

Posted by: River Guide at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (RJMhd)

111 Like I told my buddy George Stephanopoulos when we were on the jet, full grown boobehs aren't as tasty as the half grown. It's like baby arugula is better in salads than the older kind.

Once we got to the island, George came to agree with me.

Posted by: Jeffrey Epstein at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (FCsIb)

112
In honor of this censorship, I think we should have superfluous boobies on every thread all day tomorrow.

http://is.gd/SFP97V

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:28 PM (ZKzrr)

113 I'm sure the local news channel only censored it because they weren't sure if they'd be fined by another overbearing federal government agency.

Posted by: Mayn at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (1ik4Y)

114 Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?

Posted by: All Hail Eris at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (jR7Wy)

115 I guess this makes SI the conscience of the nation.

Posted by: Just Axin at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (yUSO1)

116 Jerry Saltz sounds like a fake madeup name.

Posted by: Boss Moss at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (o68RC)

117 Fox Breaking News: Jerry Saltz is a Cocksucker!

Posted by: Shemp Smith at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (8W5zZ)

118 http://is.gd/SFP97V

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier

Don't take this personally, but you suck.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (/Ho8c)

119 Let me get this straight. According to the legacy media, al'Jazeera blacking out a woman's face is just cultural, but one obscure outlet blurring some mammarian protruberences is proof that conservatives are all sexually damaged?

Got it.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:27 PM (39g3+)

Boobies?

Ewww... to old!

Posted by: Roman Polanski at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (7YlUk)

120 "48
That there is some lame shit alright. But lame and cowardly is what the MFM does these days.

Posted by: maddogg at May 14, 2015 05:19 PM (xWW96)"

I wonder about people who choose to go into journalism today. Is it really their ambition to tell lies to defend scumbag Democrat politicians? Isn't that kinda like some girl dreaming of some day growing up to suck dicks for money at the bus station?

Posted by: Obnoxious A-Hole at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (KDbAT)

121 I think we should have superfluous boobies on every thread all day tomorrow.

Posted by: mynewhandle

I saw Superfluous Boobehs open for Pussy Riot at the Abravanel Hall.

Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (VAsIq)

122 Did the NYT critic stop to think if muslims would be offended by the art?
That's the core question of art these days.

Posted by: gwelf at May 14, 2015 05:30 PM (nyxv/)

123 One guy is bragging to his friends, "I just bought a Picasso."

Another guy is bragging to his friends, "I just sold the Picasso for twice what I paid for it."

Everybody wins, everybody gets a trophy. Until the whisper campaign starts, "He had to sell the Picasso after losing all that money on Greek Bonds."

and "That guy has no taste, he paid too much." "Well I heard it was his trophy wife that wanted it."

Posted by: Idly Obscurtia at May 14, 2015 05:30 PM (NbyPU)

124 98
Would the MSM show drawings of Muhammed with boobs?

Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at May 14, 2015 05:26 PM (J0IP0)

-----------------------------------

Thread Winner

Posted by: gwelf at May 14, 2015 05:30 PM (nyxv/)

125
oh god! no one wants to see THAT uncensored.

Grow up.

Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:30 PM (ZKzrr)

126 Great point, Ace.
Yet another reason why I return again and again to this smart military blog.
Their side: inorgasmic girls required for the purity of the ummah.
Our side: your ejaculate was designed by Our Creator to produce new life. "Life is sacred. Men, women, and children are worth the greatest sacrifice, the ultimate gift."
http://preview.tinyurl.com/mp6q97f

Posted by: Steve White, still on the 750 of Lynchburg nectar at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (ZTc8k)

127 Some cute tits, to stay on topic

http://tinyurl.com/q43x4tc

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (39g3+)

128 Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?

Posted by: All Hail Eris at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (jR7Wy)

Give 'em a spin, and then decide...

Posted by: Martian hooker with three boobies at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (7YlUk)

129 Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?
Posted by: All Hail Eris
-----------------

You haven't looked at the Mother Jones pic, have you?

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (n6Nt0)

130
Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?

Posted by: All Hail Eris at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (jR7Wy)

Some people pay extra for an extra.....

Posted by: Three-Boobed Mutant Prostitute at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (lpeQC)

131 You know, Fox 5 should have shown the picture with Burquas superimposed over the females. The MSM would not have said anything.

Posted by: rd at May 14, 2015 05:32 PM (r2TIL)

132 Oh no! I've been censored!
( = Y = )

Posted by: meeeghan mccain at May 14, 2015 05:32 PM (kivUY)

133 Posted by: HR braucht ein Bier at May 14, 2015 05:30 PM (ZKzrr)

I'm trying to!

Posted by: mynewhandle at May 14, 2015 05:33 PM (AkOaV)

134 It is the amazing manifestation of His unshakable love.

Posted by: Steve White, still on the 750 of Lynchburg nectar at May 14, 2015 05:33 PM (ZTc8k)

135
Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?

Posted by: All Hail Eris at May 14, 2015 05:29 PM (jR7Wy)

Give 'em a spin, and then decide...

Posted by: Martian hooker with three boobies at May 14, 2015 05:31 PM (7YlUk)

Bitch, this is my corner! My pimp is gonna kick your ass!

Posted by: Three-Boobed Mutant Prostitute at May 14, 2015 05:33 PM (lpeQC)

136 The Kingdom in reverse.

Posted by: Steve White, still on the 750 of Lynchburg nectar at May 14, 2015 05:33 PM (ZTc8k)

137 Bitch, this is my corner! My pimp is gonna kick your ass!
Posted by: Three-Boobed Mutant Prostitute at May 14, 2015 05:33 PM (lpeQC)
---
He doesn't have the balls!

Posted by: Man With Two Penises at May 14, 2015 05:35 PM (jR7Wy)

138 To satisfy Jerry every issue of the New Yorker will presumably be including some nice artistic boobehs from this point forward.

The Other McCain has some rules they can follow.

Posted by: MTF, SMOD is my personal savior at May 14, 2015 05:35 PM (FCsIb)

139 "The SLG botched both the Saudi rep's introduction and his reference to King Saud at his dwarf summit."

Smart power.

Posted by: torquewrench at May 14, 2015 05:35 PM (noWW6)

140 The United States of America, as designed.

Posted by: Amos Singletary's Vengeful Avatar at May 14, 2015 05:35 PM (ZTc8k)

141 Ordained.

Posted by: Amos Singletary's Vengeful Avatar at May 14, 2015 05:36 PM (ZTc8k)

142 Look at these knockers!

http://tinyurl.com/k3quxn8

NSFW

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at May 14, 2015 05:36 PM (Zu3d9)

143 Boobs are proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:36 PM (Uk9e2)

144 Oh no! I've been censored!

( = Y = )

Posted by: meeeghan mccain at May 14, 2015 05:32 PM (kivUY)

I'm confused. Is that 'T' or 'A'?

Posted by: Methos at May 14, 2015 05:36 PM (ZbV+0)

145 When I put my name into the Pron name generator, it spat out "Jerry Saltz".

Posted by: MTF, SMOD is my personal savior at May 14, 2015 05:37 PM (FCsIb)

146 I hate tits.

Posted by: Harry Reid at May 14, 2015 05:37 PM (/HX7u)

147

on the question of boobs, my answer is yes.

vote mohawk/krusty 2016.

Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 14, 2015 05:38 PM (ODxAs)

148 A perfect post for a conservative art critic to weigh in, and no CAC? Quelle Horreur! *takes a shot of valurite to steady nerves*

Posted by: Moron gettin the vapours at May 14, 2015 05:38 PM (yRwC8)

149 Know who else is "sexually sick and conservative"?

Facebook allows bare buns, but no bare breasts, even in artwork. Artists and photographers are censored for posting artwork with bare breasts, even on closed art/photography pages.

A sizable number of juried art shows and galleries don't allow nudity. This is a particular frustration because I paint figures and there are few shows I can enter. As to the galleries-- blah! Who needs to see yet another pretty picture of bluebonnets or sun streaming through clouds to highlight water, trees, and mountains?

Posted by: obladioblada at May 14, 2015 05:39 PM (WVxCU)

150 notice the censor didn't blur out the ass

de gustibus

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:40 PM (Uk9e2)

151

The model CAC found was a force of nature, that one. She was truly real, and magnificent.

What was her name? She modeled other things besides green latex.

Posted by: imp at May 14, 2015 05:40 PM (3XvXS)

152 I was not aware that some, when glancing at a woman's bare breasts, react in a murderous rage.

Posted by: fly gal at May 14, 2015 05:40 PM (UBzfi)

153 It seems to me that in my youth, indigenous boobies, and even the occasional New Guinean phallocrypt, were allowed to bob and frolic uncensored on yer more educational programs. Now even buttcracks are mosaic'd out.

What have we lost as a culture that such innocent floppy bits are deemed too offensive for public consumption?

Posted by: All Hail Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 05:40 PM (jR7Wy)

154 in which two weeks ago lefties were censoring American Sniper...now sniping at local affiliate for covering boobies.

When we know that the fake 1 in five stat is based upon being forced to look at painted bewbs as one of the criteria.

Posted by: joe-impeachin44 at May 14, 2015 05:40 PM (ZtH3P)

155 Can any bewbs be said to be "superfluous"?

Posted by: All Hail Eris

Nope!

--Yarna d'al' Gargan

Posted by: Turd Ferguson at May 14, 2015 05:41 PM (VAsIq)

156 porn is a $9+bn industry, who needs to see more tits and ass?

eh, I denounce myself

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:41 PM (Uk9e2)

157 *stares at Feh*

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:42 PM (/Ho8c)

158 The troubling thing is what the MFM reports is what is believed by the bumblewits. They have zero interest in the truth. Or not enough interest to question what they're told.

Posted by: Hank at May 14, 2015 05:42 PM (mb+j8)

159 I am old enough to remember nips in the Victoria Secret catalog. I hear the models have there breasts altered now. No more unsightly nipples.

Posted by: nip at May 14, 2015 05:43 PM (a6Odp)

160 The model CAC found was a force of nature, that one. She was truly real, and magnificent.

What was her name? She modeled other things besides green latex.

Posted by: imp

Do not know. She was easy on the eyes.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:43 PM (/Ho8c)

161 Fuck them.

Fuck this magazine. Fuck that TV station. Fuck all of them in particular.

Posted by: zombie at May 14, 2015 05:43 PM (jBuUi)

162 waswasyah!

wouldnt want Picasso nudity whispering its Satanic whispers to all the delicate jihadi's we let into the country

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:43 PM (Uk9e2)

163 I'm betting Jerry Saltz is no fan of boobehs, himself. his therapist is going to have a field day trying to understand the psychological background to this made-up story. And the significance of the hashtag #SickMinds.

Posted by: MTF, SMOD is my personal savior at May 14, 2015 05:43 PM (FCsIb)

164 hahaha

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:44 PM (Uk9e2)

165 OT:

Apparently all the "radical" Leftists in the UK got together to have themselves a little shindig...

#RadicalAssembly is trending over on Twitter.

Posted by: The Political Hat (@ThePoliticalHat) at May 14, 2015 05:44 PM (7YlUk)

166 The model CAC found was a force of nature, that one. She was truly real, and magnificent.

What was her name? She modeled other things besides green latex.

Posted by: imp

I'll just say that I'd paint her really hard.

Posted by: Moderate Salami at May 14, 2015 05:44 PM (/Ho8c)

167
Posted by: obladioblada at May 14, 2015 05:39 PM (WVxCU)

Where there's a will, there's a way.

Posted by: Zombie Daniel de Volterra, The Breeches Maker at May 14, 2015 05:44 PM (lpeQC)

168 I am old enough to remember nips in the Victoria Secret catalog. I hear the models have there breasts altered now. No more unsightly nipples.

Nipple sanding is a big deal now. They'll rent you the equipment at Home Depot, and you can hire a guy to do it for about $50 out in the parking lot.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2015 05:46 PM (8ZskC)

169 whatever they accuse anyone of...
they've already said or done the same or worse

Posted by: Mr Wizard at May 14, 2015 05:47 PM (eOpVe)

170 Anyone else notice the empty wizard hat in the Picasso painting?

Hrm.

Posted by: ConservativeMonster at May 14, 2015 05:47 PM (0NdlF)

171 Where there's a will, there's a way.
Posted by: Zombie Daniel de Volterra, The Breeches Maker at May 14, 2015 05:44 PM (lpeQC)
----
I believe at one time the inyerface codpieces in Bruegel's frisky masterpiece "The Wedding Dance" were painted over. They were later restored to their former glory.

Posted by: All Hail Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 05:47 PM (jR7Wy)

172 I hear the models have there breasts altered now.

-----

Typo: Should read "I hear the models have them there breasts altered now."

Posted by: Larry the Cable Guy at May 14, 2015 05:49 PM (VAsIq)

173 Rich people should not be allowed to cover the boobehs!

Posted by: TFG, King of the Malaprop at May 14, 2015 05:51 PM (FCsIb)

174 I think we should all thank Mr. O' Spades for the nice boob/bewb thread.

Posted by: Weasel at May 14, 2015 05:52 PM (e3bId)

175 161: zombie: This x A million. And, fuck Picasso.

Posted by: Chavez the Hugo at May 14, 2015 05:52 PM (ucDmr)

176 I guess they "forgot" all about conservative ragging on John Ashcroft for covering up the boobehs of all those classical statues. The MfM has what my neighbor like to call Sometimers. She doesn't forget all the time, just sometimes.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at May 14, 2015 05:53 PM (Vm8WO)

177 We live in the era of Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson. You'd think we'd be beyond such things by now.

Posted by: Wardrobe Malfunction at May 14, 2015 05:55 PM (xkSSa)

178 Typo: Should read "I hear the models have them there breasts altered now."

Emerson fine ones whats always been altared.

Posted by: Count de Monet at May 14, 2015 05:55 PM (JO9+V)

179 Obligatory Insty nice incentive structure you're building there, media.

Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us SMOD at May 14, 2015 05:55 PM (UNFxP)

180 It is a *religious tenet* of leftism that the right (being Not Us) is sexually repressed.

This "mistake" was just an unchallengeable assumption, and will be reported for years to come, unlike the Charlie Hebdo pictures.

Because they're crass hypocrites, and they can't correct their hypocrisy because another tenet of their religion is that the Right (who are Not Us) are hypocrites and We aren't.

The really scary part is that a lone leftist may actually admit this if confronted without backup singers, but will generally deny it the next day after their "fact correcting code" kicks in.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2015 05:55 PM (bLnSU)

181 so how much would the Horde pay foe a Picasso?

I'll start the bidding at $100

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:56 PM (Uk9e2)

182 Hi Bebe, hope things are going well!

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2015 05:56 PM (bLnSU)

183 I believe at one time the inyerface codpieces in Bruegel's frisky masterpiece "The Wedding Dance" were painted over. They were later restored to their former glory.

Posted by: All Hail Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 05:47 PM (jR7Wy)

---

Pope JP II uncovered artwork and urged artists to paint the figure "naked without shame."

Posted by: obladioblada at May 14, 2015 05:57 PM (WVxCU)

184 181 so how much would the Horde pay foe a Picasso?

I'll start the bidding at $100
Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:56 PM (Uk9e2)

Never cared for Pablo. Among other things, his execution was sloppy. Check out "Three Musicians" at the Guggnheim. Sloppy brush strokes, and pencil marks all over the place.

But Moron lifestyle, so there's that.

Posted by: Bob's House of Flannel Shirts and Wallet Chains at May 14, 2015 05:58 PM (vgIRn)

185 Headline on yahoo - no I don't read their slant -

Iranian naval vessel fires on another ship in Persian gulf.

Posted by: teej at May 14, 2015 05:58 PM (qyZxC)

186 Pick you *own* asso, asso!

heh heh heh

Posted by: Beavis at May 14, 2015 05:58 PM (l3LvV)

187 If the painting had DD Lisa Ann monster titties it would have sold for an easy 200mil

Posted by: navypopojojo at May 14, 2015 05:58 PM (Ki+Xn)

188 Inyerface codpieces are a curse, I tells ya.

Posted by: Shemp Smith at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (8W5zZ)

189 i will bet money the average righties have more and better sex than the lefties

hence their hysteria

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (Uk9e2)

190 What about me? Don't leave me bobbing in the breeze.

Posted by: Michelangelo's David at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (JO9+V)

191 Nipple sanding is a big deal now. They'll rent you
the equipment at Home Depot, and you can hire a guy to do it for about
$50 out in the parking lot.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 14, 2015 05:46 PM (8ZskC)

Don't forget your cock-caulking, while you are there.

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (ecDRv)

192 180 It is a *religious tenet* of leftism that the right (being Not Us) is sexually repressed.

This "mistake" was just an unchallengeable assumption, and will be reported for years to come, unlike the Charlie Hebdo pictures.

---

Yet, conservatives and Christians tend to reproduce more than their leftist critics. They're obviously doing something right.

Posted by: obladioblada at May 14, 2015 06:00 PM (WVxCU)

193 plumbing alterations, too

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:01 PM (Uk9e2)

194 $174 million for that shit?That's an outrage.

Posted by: steevy at May 14, 2015 06:01 PM (mGBKM)

195 i will bet money the average righties have more and better sex than the lefties

hence their hysteria
Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (Uk9e2)

Hence my oft repeated suggestion that the Left could stand the traditional cure therefore.

Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us SMOD at May 14, 2015 06:01 PM (UNFxP)

196 free market

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:02 PM (Uk9e2)

197 Do leftists own mirrors?

Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 14, 2015 06:02 PM (zRby/)

198 Don't forget your cock-caulking, while you are there.
Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 05:59 PM (ecDRv)

***********
One of the funnier "Crank Yankers" was the British puppet asking the hardware clerk about black caulk.

Posted by: Just Some Guy at May 14, 2015 06:02 PM (vgIRn)

199 197
Do leftists own mirrors?

Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 14, 2015 06:02 PM (zRby/)

That would require trigger warnings.

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 06:03 PM (ecDRv)

200 196 Yeah,they are welcome to it but in my opinion,Picasso sucks.

Posted by: steevy at May 14, 2015 06:03 PM (mGBKM)

201 Meh.

If you've seen one bewb, you've seen them both.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 06:03 PM (0HooB)

202 "Yet, conservatives and Christians tend to reproduce more than their leftist critics. They're obviously doing something right."

Yeah, it's always odd when they say "lol, the vagina is not a clown car!" and then say "Geeesh, why do you hate sex so much?"

Uh....

Posted by: Lauren at May 14, 2015 06:04 PM (MYCIw)

203 Do leftists own mirrors?

Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at May 14, 2015 06:02 PM (zRby/)
---
They don't cast reflections.

Posted by: All Hail Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 06:04 PM (jR7Wy)

204 If you've seen one bewb, you've seen them both.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 06:03 PM (0HooB)
----
Heresy! Tie him to the rack!

Posted by: La Popessa Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 06:05 PM (jR7Wy)

205 Hence my oft repeated suggestion that the Left could stand the traditional cure therefore.

A proper rogering?

A suitable shagging?

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 06:05 PM (0HooB)

206 the traditional cure as I understand it was unprotected sex with a committed partner for life, judiciously and deliciously managed

this was the deal

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:05 PM (Uk9e2)

207 so how much would the Horde pay foe a Picasso?

I'll start the bidding at $100

Only if the frame is really nice.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 06:07 PM (0HooB)

208 "How sexually sick...?"

Gee I dunno, maybe ask the dude with his arm around you in your profile pic, Jerry.

Posted by: WalterKronk at May 14, 2015 06:07 PM (6lUIi)

209 >>195 i will bet money the average righties have more and better sex than

I am killing our team average. Sorry.

Posted by: Garrett at May 14, 2015 06:07 PM (7K7xP)

210 I see Russ Feingold, liberal sucker of cock, is running for senate in this God foraken state again. He'll probably win the lying fucker.

Posted by: Chavez the Hugo at May 14, 2015 06:08 PM (ucDmr)

211 the traditional cure as I understand it was unprotected sex with a committed partner for life, judiciously and deliciously managed

this was the deal

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:05 PM (Uk9e2)
----
The Industrial Revolution provided other, coal and or steam-powered, options:

http://tinyurl.com/ml5w5l4

(Warning: MuffPo))

Posted by: La Popessa Eris, pudendum panjandrum at May 14, 2015 06:08 PM (jR7Wy)

212 I am killing our team average. Sorry.

Posted by: Garrett at May 14, 2015 06:07 PM (7K7xP)
Come on ladies. Take one for the team.

Posted by: flounder at May 14, 2015 06:08 PM (ecDRv)

213 201 Meh.

If you've seen one bewb, you've seen them both.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this sh1t at May 14, 2015 06:03 PM (0HooB)

I'm more of the Ron White school of philosophy on tits.

Posted by: Buzzion at May 14, 2015 06:10 PM (z/Ubi)

214 Fill in the blank: Leftists can suck a bag of blurred-out _________.

Posted by: Minuteman at May 14, 2015 06:10 PM (yQVAQ)

215 among the works at auction this past week was the rather famous photograph by diane arbus of a manic boy clenching hand grenades, easily interpreted as emblematic of the effects of repressed, militarized american culture. here's what really happened:

arbus was in central park when she saw the boy playing. she asked the boy's mother permission to phograph her son and proceeded to snap photo after photo, from back, side, front over and over, until the kid finality blew up at her! lady will you please stop bothering me! and now you know the rest of the story.

Posted by: emily post at May 14, 2015 06:10 PM (CrYC8)

216 Face it, the Left animates itself on anti-Christian bigotry. A lot of them have the bogey-man of prudish characters straight out of 'A Handmaid's Tale' that they're on the constant look-out for (ignoring the neo-puritanism forced on them schizophrenically by feminists).

Especially heading toward election time, anything they can do to try to resurrect that bogey-man, they're gonna do.

Posted by: Pappy O'Daniel at May 14, 2015 06:11 PM (oVJmc)

217 Even Rick Santorum is getting regular nookie.

Posted by: steevy at May 14, 2015 06:13 PM (mGBKM)

218 When is Bitch and Boner's "Cfuk You Machine" going to kick into high gear?

Oh wait, it already has. But just against conservatives, not Democrats.

Posted by: Hurricane LaFawnduh at May 14, 2015 06:13 PM (laMCB)

219 ok I win the Picasso, sell it for a mint, and buy the Horde a fapping paradise with private jets in the south Pacific

meanwhile, the tedious slog against the SJWs continues, for which we can be grateful for boobs

I raise my glass of Redbreast to you all

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:14 PM (Uk9e2)

220 After considerable research I have concluded that what is unseen, and only imagined, is more sexy that what is seen.

There is a news story about ISIS outraged that a man left his woman's eyes uncovered. I forget what the penalty was, but Jesus said, If you see something that offends you, then pluck out your [own] eyes.

Posted by: Dillie Lystrokoslich at May 14, 2015 06:14 PM (eFsI+)

221 bonus:

do you remember the guy with a moustache who played a psychiatrist on "m*a*s*h"? that's diane arbus' husband, allan arbus!

Posted by: emily post at May 14, 2015 06:14 PM (CrYC8)

222 just trying to help.

Posted by: emily post at May 14, 2015 06:16 PM (CrYC8)

223 I think Megyn should flash us all tonight. Just to shut them up

Posted by: tu3031 at May 14, 2015 06:16 PM (EDYaR)

224 221 The psychiatrist who always had to listen to Hawkeye's whing.I remember.

Posted by: steevy at May 14, 2015 06:16 PM (mGBKM)

225 When their heads are decapitated from bodies by the JV team, the peaceful religion of the prophet Mohammed, their lips of the lying, partisan journalists would still be moving, complaining about intolerant right wingers.

Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 14, 2015 06:17 PM (1sJza)

226 No, he said if you see or hear something that offends you, go run to your safe place.

Posted by: Oberline College Administrators at May 14, 2015 06:17 PM (laMCB)

227 >>217 Even Rick Santorum is getting regular nookie.

While wearing a sweater-vest.

I know.

Posted by: Garrett at May 14, 2015 06:17 PM (7K7xP)

228 unseen? alluring, yes

sexier than what you can see?

can't agree with you there

Posted by: Feh at May 14, 2015 06:17 PM (Uk9e2)

229 It wasn't a chicken...

IT WAS A BABY!!!

Posted by: Hawkeye Pierce at May 14, 2015 06:18 PM (7K7xP)

230 I'm not hurting the team average, my sample was rejected as a statistical reporting error.

Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at May 14, 2015 06:19 PM (bLnSU)

231 Since we're doing art appreciation and someone mentioned Diane Arbus, of whom I knew nothing being uneducated and had to google it, produced an article in Smithsonian Magazine.

http://tinyurl.com/k4fjqbf

Posted by: Dillie Lystrokoslich at May 14, 2015 06:21 PM (eFsI+)

232 They throw out the outliers, don't they?

Posted by: Garrett at May 14, 2015 06:21 PM (7K7xP)

233 It wasn't a chicken...

IT WAS A BABY!!!

Posted by: Hawkeye Pierce at May 14, 2015 06:18 PM (7K7xP)

No big difference...

Posted by: Jonathan Swift at May 14, 2015 06:23 PM (7YlUk)

234 "They throw out the outliers, don't they?"

It's an oddly shaped bell curve until you normalize the data.

Posted by: Dillie Lystrokoslich at May 14, 2015 06:25 PM (eFsI+)

235 Hey, if this painting was shown in a Columbia art class and some Special Snowflake said it offended her because rapey - well, now that would be a totes legit reason for censorship!

And when the Left censors they don't dink around with merely covering something or blurring an image onscreen - hell, no, they have to gather in some public forum and rage and scream. Make the The Bad Thing Go Away, Mommy!

Posted by: Donna &&&&&& V. (brandishing ampersands) at May 14, 2015 06:25 PM (+XMAD)

236 Jerry's from Oak Park, Illinois; properly 'The People's Republic Of Oak Park'.

I'm sure he went to the big city determined to out culture-vulture the native New Yawkas, and by Jeebus he's doing a bang-up job!

Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at May 14, 2015 06:30 PM (DLu2s)

237 Posted by: emily post at May 14, 2015 06:10 PM (CrYC

Yeah, that was Diane Arbus's specialty: making ordinary Americans seem creepy and unhinged, especially if they were doing something like waving American flags.

I liked her photos when I was in adolescent rebellion myself against suburbia and my boring parents. It wasn't until much later that I realized what cheap shots she took.

Posted by: Donna &&&&&& V. (brandishing ampersands) at May 14, 2015 06:30 PM (+XMAD)

238 Because Racism.

So... I count Arabs, Persians, Indonesians, Malays, Cechnians, Turks, Uzbeks, Uuigers, Pakistanis, Afghans and some others.

How exactly is Islam a race?

I do think that it is disgusting and contemptible, but no more nor less than Communism, Socialism, or Democratism.

I don't despise you because of your looks, sweetie; it's the content of your character that disgusts me.

Posted by: revolting peasant at May 14, 2015 06:31 PM (nVss6)

239 it's not as if you couldn't really tell what part of the Picasso painting are supposed to be particular items anyway. What's the big deal?

Posted by: Sharkman at May 14, 2015 06:34 PM (YsLaz)

240 235:

good point. they're out there ready to attack art as well. before she was ubiquitous, ariana huffington wrote a book denouncing picasso for mistreating his wives and mistresses. she declared that picasso's market would be ruined.

guess she was wrong. again.

Posted by: emily post at May 14, 2015 06:34 PM (CrYC8)

241 It wasn't a chicken...

IT WAS A BABY!!!

Posted by: Hawkeye Pierce at May 14, 2015 06:18 PM (7K7xP)

Ha! I had done my best to forget that bathic episode.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at May 14, 2015 06:57 PM (rwI+c)

242 or bathetic

either or

Posted by: Grump928(C) at May 14, 2015 06:57 PM (rwI+c)

243 Christ, just look at the weak-chinned bitch's Twitter profile pic posing with noted rapist Bill Clinton.

What a total fag. Who would want to be that guy?

Posted by: Warden at May 14, 2015 07:04 PM (wHAYQ)

244 More to the point, the painting is hideous. Picasso at his misanthropic (best)

Posted by: Caliban at May 14, 2015 07:20 PM (3GFMN)

245 Meh. I've painted better tits.

And $74 million? That could buy 3 Levitated Masses.

Posted by: CAC at May 14, 2015 07:26 PM (Sbv7r)

246 Most conservatives are just uncomfortable about tits
Remember when Attorney General Ashvroft had that statue covered?

Posted by: Saddam at May 14, 2015 07:57 PM (ph/F7)

247 emember when Attorney General Ashvroft had that statue covered?

ISWYDT

Posted by: Grump928(C) at May 14, 2015 08:01 PM (rwI+c)

248 The painting looks like the prophet mo-ham-mud. Everyone should censor it.

Posted by: Me at May 14, 2015 08:06 PM (76Ygl)

249 psychiatrist on "m*a*s*h"

Sydney Feldman, MD

Posted by: Fox2! at May 14, 2015 08:13 PM (brIR5)

250 Remember when Attorney General Ashvroft had that statue covered?

Because the media always tried to frame whoever was speaking between them?

Posted by: Fox2! at May 14, 2015 08:14 PM (brIR5)

251 The real obscenity is that someone paid $197 million for a damn painting. I don't care if it is Picasso. I bet you he's laughing in heaven.

Posted by: RobertM at May 15, 2015 08:11 AM (H2FoK)

252 I don't see what the big deal is. Did FOX do something to the painting itself.

Posted by: Ben(the original) at May 15, 2015 10:49 AM (DcG8N)

Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0366 seconds.
15 queries taking 0.017 seconds, 261 records returned.
Page size 116 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.