Support
Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Supreme Court Hears Arguments Over Nationwide Universal Injunctions Issued by Lowly District Court Justices Who Keep Electing Themselves President
A lowly district court issued a One Man Universal decision stating that birthright citizenship was the law of the land and always would be, and then issuing various nationwide injunctions purporting to control President Trump's actions.
Trump appealed, but only on one part of the ruling: The arrogance of a lowly district court judge, who only has jurisdiction over the area (the literal jurisdiction) he is seated in, issuing what he purports to be nationwide "universal" injunctions. (An injunction is a judicial order forbidding someone from doing something.) Nationwide injunctions are highly controversial, especially by lowly district court judges, because they are at the very, very bottom of the federal judicial system, and yet they keep arrogating to themselves plenary power to dictate the elected government actions. Even more importantly, district courts only have jurisdiction over the small, um, jurisdiction they're appointed to judge cases in. In other words, a district court judge from southern Massachusetts has the power to rule on cases in southern Massachusetts. But these low-level bureaucrats keep claiming to have nationwide or "universal" jurisdiction, and instead of limiting their rulings' effect to just the jurisdiction they are seated in, they claim they can rule for the entire country. These rulings have long been considered out-of-bounds -- including by Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who argued against universal injunctions issued by district courts when she was Obama's Solicitor General. She has a different opinion now, of course.Of course this c*nt did.
Jonathan Turley
@JonathanTurley The Supreme Court argument is now concluded and there was far more heat than light offered inside the courtroom... ...Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh seemed strongly in favor of the Administration. Roberts also made repeated points that seemed to support some of the arguments of the Administration, though it was not clear how he would vote... ...On the left, Kagan repeatedly strived to distinguish this case from her earlier objections to universal injunctions under the Biden Administration. She seemed solidly with Sotomayor and Jackson... ...That leaves Gorsuch and Barrett. Gorsuch has previously expressed criticism of universal injunctions but asked probing questions on both sides. Barrett seemed more accommodating in seeking a way to uphold universal injunctions...
From Ed Morrissey:
...In other words, this could be a nail-biter. I think that the Administration still has an advantage in curtailing universal injunctions. However, I did not come away with the sense of a lock with a majority, particularly given Barrett's questions. I am also unsure how Roberts and Gorsuch will play out on the details. Fortunately, we will likely know within a couple of weeks.
NYT legal reporter Adam Liptak sums this up with fair accuracy:
The justices have been struggling with two contrary impulses. Many are troubled by injunctions issued by individual federal judges that block executive branch initiatives nationwide. But many of them are also troubled by the executive order seeking to ban birthright citizenship and frustrated by the difficulty of reaching the merits, as the Trump administration has only appealed on the first point. New Jersey's lawyer may have offered a middle ground, arguing that this is the rare case in which nationwide relief is needed because it is the only way to grant complete relief to the more than 20 plaintiff states.
@ShipwreckedCrew predicts the justices may split, and uphold the universal injunction only as to the ban of Trump's order reversing so-called "birthright citizenship," but setting up oversight/checks-and-balances for universal injunctions in all other cases. The "wise Latina" Sotomayor kept Asking Statements of the Solicitor General. She would "Ask" a Declaration and then cut off the Solicitor General before he could respond. Even Roberts eventually had enough of her, and interrupted her interrupting to tell her that he actually wanted to hear the Solicitor General's answer to her statement.
Martin Harry
@MartinHarryFL Listening to the birthright citizenship oral argument at the US Supreme Court. Justice Sotomayor continues to be argumentative, ask questions without allowing a response and monopolizes the Court's time. Chief Justice Roberts had had enough and cut her off. Later, he directly contradicts her belief that Supreme Court review takes 4-5 years, even in emergency cases.
Fox:
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts reined in Justice Sonia Sotomayor during argument over birthright citizenship and nationwide court injunctions on Thursday. Sotomayor dominated questioning for several minutes at the outset of Thursday's argument after taking over from Justice Clarence Thomas. She pressed U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer for President Donald Trump's administration on several points relating to the authority for federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions, often speaking over the lawyer and interrupting him. Sotomayor argued that Trump's order invalidating birthright citizenship violated four Supreme Court precedents, and that it was justified for a federal judge to grant an injunction against such a controversial order. "You are claiming that not just the Supreme Court, that both the Supreme Court and no lower court, can stop an executive from universally violating holdings by this court," Sotomayor said. "We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an appropriate case only in class only," Sauer said. "But I hear that--," Sotomayor said, beginning to interrupt Sauer. "Can I hear the rest of his answer?" Roberts then interjected.
HUGE SMACKDOWN!!! Trump's Solicitor General fact-checked Sotomayor on birthright citizenship so brutally that she started interrupting him constantly.
— George (@BehizyTweets) May 15, 2025
Sotomayor: "Right now we have novel courts who've percolated this issue and said you're violating precedent, not only precedent… pic.twitter.com/Udx3JFIG2R
🚨 Justice Amy Coney Barrett just grilled the Trump admin over rogue activist judges' national injunctions.
— Derrick Evans (@DerrickEvans4WV) May 15, 2025
Barrett: You’re saying you would respect the judgment, but not necessarily the opinion of a lower court? pic.twitter.com/bn7MkytzII
Meanwhile: Deb Heine at American Greatness says that a judge has rigged a hearing on Trump's tariffs to make sure that the judges hearing it are On the Right Team.
A three-judge panel at the United States Court of International Trade in lower Manhattan heard arguments in the case Tuesday, and reportedly "appeared skeptical" of the president's arguments. If the panel decides that Trump's emergency declaration was unlawful, it would effectively block the president's global tariffs and upend his economic agenda. The chief judge of the United States Court of International Trade is Mark A Barnett, who joined the court in 2013 after a nomination from President Barack Obama. He became chief judge on April 6, 2021. According to the well-placed source, rather than drawing the panel at random, Chief Judge Barnett "fixed" the outcome by selecting three judges whom he knew would "overrule the president" and render his tariffs "null and void."
Comments
(Jump to bottom of comments)1
Justice Thomas pretty much Nuked the nationwide injunction issue.
Posted by: Mister Scott (Formerly GWS) at May 15, 2025 05:35 PM (e5NfL)
2
Somebody forgot to whop off the italics tag.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 05:36 PM (A2D3h)
3
justice thomas making the court lean to the right?
Posted by: anachronda at May 15, 2025 05:36 PM (sGtp+)
4
Whatever the ruling, it should do more for political stability than Dredd Scott. Especially if it is the wrong decision.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 05:36 PM (/lPRQ)
5
Straightened?
Posted by: banana Dream at May 15, 2025 05:36 PM (cduTK)
6
My man Ace really has formatting trouble.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:37 PM (Uc8km)
7
First?
Posted by: CTHillary, dead but dreaming at May 15, 2025 05:38 PM (VXSVh)
8
Oh, unlike Kagan and Sotomayer, I read the content!
Posted by: CTHillary, dead but dreaming at May 15, 2025 05:38 PM (VXSVh)
9
Don’t get your hopes up, kiddo.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (l3YAf)
10
Wide Latinas hardest hit.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (A2D3h)
11
Justice is partisan.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (URXDc)
12
A lowly district court
_______
"Lowly"?
????
He's a a personage of noble rank and title —
A dignified and potent officer
Whose functions are particularly vital!
_______
"Lowly"?
????
He's a a personage of noble rank and title —
A dignified and potent officer
Whose functions are particularly vital!
Posted by: Eeyore at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (1bNHn)
13
...In other words, this could be a nail-biter.
No it won't. Barrett will side with the other women, because that's what Barrett is going to do the rest of her time on the court - and what she was destined to do when she was appointed. No woman is going to go against the consensus of three other women in any group.
When faced with a 4-4 tie, Roberts will side with the four liberals. Because that's what Roberts does. And he doesn't want to be unpopular in his social circle.
The End.
No it won't. Barrett will side with the other women, because that's what Barrett is going to do the rest of her time on the court - and what she was destined to do when she was appointed. No woman is going to go against the consensus of three other women in any group.
When faced with a 4-4 tie, Roberts will side with the four liberals. Because that's what Roberts does. And he doesn't want to be unpopular in his social circle.
The End.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (Uc8km)
14
Anyone that has ever asked a woman where they'd like to go for dinner understands why women should never be put in positions where decision-making on important issues matters.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (8hq5W)
15
"Can I hear the rest of his answer? Shut your piehole, you dumb bitch," Roberts then interjected.
"
Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (QnmlO)
16
3-6 against Trump
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:40 PM (l3YAf)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:40 PM (u82oZ)
18
It boils down to who runs Bartertown…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:40 PM (PCK5/)
19
I can’t wait to hear what kind of tortured ruling this collection of retards barfs out, Thomas and Alito excepted.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at May 15, 2025 05:41 PM (GhgAD)
20
Imagine being Alito and Thomas working at the Supreme Court and having to listen to the liberal /leftists all day long, particularly Action Jackson. And you thought your job had PITB people to deal with?!
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 05:41 PM (fx2cy)
21
We are going to take the rod of Liberal Narrative and Justice and break it off in the anus of liberal SCOTUS judges.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:41 PM (u82oZ)
22
So by agreeing with nationwide injunctions, the SC also agrees that lower courts supersede the other pillars of our government too.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:41 PM (URXDc)
23
The Tree of Liberty needs to be nourished with some tasty Supreme snacks.
Posted by: Marooned at May 15, 2025 05:42 PM (kt8QE)
24
I suspect national injunctions will remain a thing for the simple reason that most judges are lazy and don’t want more cases on their docket. Get rid of national injunctions, and that one case challenging Trump’s whatever is gonna be 50 cases (one in each state).
Posted by: Elric the Bladiest Blade at May 15, 2025 05:42 PM (K9Eg0)
25
Who the hell even knew that we had a "United States Court of International Trade"?
And as a sequitur... who the hell cares what a "United States Court of International Trade" says?
And as a sequitur... who the hell cares what a "United States Court of International Trade" says?
Posted by: Defenestratus at May 15, 2025 05:42 PM (aZfF2)
26
Injuncting for fun and profit… black robe required, work remotely..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (PCK5/)
27
What pisses me off is conservative justices don't seem to be willing to play by the same rules.
I don't remember any of this happening when Obama was president. Did anyone remember say "Cash for Clunkers" having to go to the Supreme Court before it could roll out?
Every single item of the Trump agenda is having to basically go in front of the SC.
I don't remember any of this happening when Obama was president. Did anyone remember say "Cash for Clunkers" having to go to the Supreme Court before it could roll out?
Every single item of the Trump agenda is having to basically go in front of the SC.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (4pwAx)
28
IF District Judges have more power than the President, this is a clear insurrection. We need Marines and Robert E. Lee to retake their chambers.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (u82oZ)
29
" . . . Who Keep Electing Themselves President . . ."
Why would they want to do that? Obviously they think it would be a demotion.
Why would they want to do that? Obviously they think it would be a demotion.
Posted by: jc at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (P3EVa)
30
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (8hq5W)
1. Where to go to dinner is not an important legal issue
2. Some women have never had this problem about not being able to pick a place to eat out.
💋 smooches
1. Where to go to dinner is not an important legal issue
2. Some women have never had this problem about not being able to pick a place to eat out.
💋 smooches
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (fx2cy)
31
Don't like a congressional bill?
Get a district judge to put a TRO on it.
Don't like a law? TRO.
Budget bill doesn't give enough to a vocal minority?
TRO is your friend.
Get a district judge to put a TRO on it.
Don't like a law? TRO.
Budget bill doesn't give enough to a vocal minority?
TRO is your friend.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (URXDc)
32
Want a new kind of citizenship?
"Derived Citizenship", that is the spawn will have the same status as the parents.
This was actually the case prior to the 19th Amendment. Being a patriarchal society the child citizenship was derived from the father (if known), mother next*, and finally American by default if the child was a 'foundling'.
*Being before the 19th, women who married derived citizenship from the husband. There were standard forms (SF) to resort ecitizenship to women who married foreigners after this knock-on effect from the 19th turned up. That SF was (and may still be) available on-line. It was 25 years ago.
"Derived Citizenship", that is the spawn will have the same status as the parents.
This was actually the case prior to the 19th Amendment. Being a patriarchal society the child citizenship was derived from the father (if known), mother next*, and finally American by default if the child was a 'foundling'.
*Being before the 19th, women who married derived citizenship from the husband. There were standard forms (SF) to resort ecitizenship to women who married foreigners after this knock-on effect from the 19th turned up. That SF was (and may still be) available on-line. It was 25 years ago.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 05:43 PM (/lPRQ)
33
Always remember, peasants, that Some courts are more equal than others…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:44 PM (PCK5/)
34
What formatting issues? I always see these weird comments about italics this and bolded that, then I check and only see the perfectly typesetted text we’ve all come to expect from this fine establishment.
Sad.
Sad.
Posted by: banana Dream at May 15, 2025 05:44 PM (cduTK)
35
No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:44 PM (4pwAx)
36
On the injunction issue they can split the baby and only allow the injunction to apply to the circuit, but not the entire nation. That's the way judicial precedent works as a general matter. Where circuits aren't bound by decisions of other circuits.
On the merits, if SCOTUS upholds Birthright Citizenship it'll be worse than Dred Scott Dredd Roberts know this.
On the merits, if SCOTUS upholds Birthright Citizenship it'll be worse than Dred Scott Dredd Roberts know this.
Posted by: Ignoramus at May 15, 2025 05:45 PM (Gqoy+)
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:45 PM (8hq5W)
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
39
Notice when the Left wants something stopped there's a nationwide injuction in a jiffy, but when the Right wants something stopped they have no standing?
Notice when the Left wants something stopped there's a nationwide injuction in a jiffy, but when the Right wants something stopped they have no standing?
Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (QnmlO)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (u82oZ)
41
38 Who pushed the liberal Mary Jane ACB on us?
Is she a Bushie? A Rover?
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
Nope Trump
Is she a Bushie? A Rover?
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
Nope Trump
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (PCK5/)
42
No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
There could have been one exception. Janice Rogers Brown would have made Scalia blush. She would have been outstanding. Because she had will and a firm philosophical underpinning. We lost a great opportunity with her. And by we, I mean the country.
There could have been one exception. Janice Rogers Brown would have made Scalia blush. She would have been outstanding. Because she had will and a firm philosophical underpinning. We lost a great opportunity with her. And by we, I mean the country.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (Uc8km)
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
44
Barrett is a total lefty on immigration. I heard something to that effect , concerning things about her, way back when she was considered. She sailed through, as y'all remember.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:47 PM (g47mK)
45
43 No, I'm asking who gave her name to Trump and pushed for her.
Trump didn't know who she was.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
Ah, sorry Bama..
Trump didn't know who she was.
Posted by: AlaBAMA at May 15, 2025 05:46 PM (URXDc)
Ah, sorry Bama..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:47 PM (PCK5/)
46
Do you figure India had help with curb stomping Pakistan?
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (A2D3h)
47
Who pushed the liberal Mary Jane ACB on us?
Is she a Bushie? A Rover?
Posted by: AlaBAMA
====
Democrats made it a thing that every conservative male justice would have some rapey allegation created so Trump went with a woman to dodge this.
A super Catholic woman, which some confuse with being conservative.
Is she a Bushie? A Rover?
Posted by: AlaBAMA
====
Democrats made it a thing that every conservative male justice would have some rapey allegation created so Trump went with a woman to dodge this.
A super Catholic woman, which some confuse with being conservative.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (4pwAx)
48
Who pushed her ? establishment Rs who love them some illegals - the likes of Koch family.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (g47mK)
49
In fact no more three name women in government.
Any woman that will not submit to her husband winds up being a catastrophe.
Any woman that will not submit to her husband winds up being a catastrophe.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (8hq5W)
50
The problem with women on the supreme court (didn't italicize on purpose) isn't having one. Its having four.
Because four women in a group of nine are going to form one consensus. It's human behavior.
Because four women in a group of nine are going to form one consensus. It's human behavior.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (Uc8km)
51
* Chinese Birth Tourism to and in the US has entered the argument *
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (cSz/v)
52
There could have been one exception. Janice Rogers Brown would have made Scalia blush. She would have been outstanding. Because she had will and a firm philosophical underpinning. We lost a great opportunity with her. And by we, I mean the country.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong
===
Women are wired to yield to peer pressure. And are total bleeding hearts.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong
===
Women are wired to yield to peer pressure. And are total bleeding hearts.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:49 PM (4pwAx)
53
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:46
He went out to get a new cell phone with son because it dropped out of son's pocket and someone ran over it. Aaaaargh!!! I did make him a nice dinner ( spouse) I'll have to kiss him later for stopping me from strangling son when I heard this news.
He went out to get a new cell phone with son because it dropped out of son's pocket and someone ran over it. Aaaaargh!!! I did make him a nice dinner ( spouse) I'll have to kiss him later for stopping me from strangling son when I heard this news.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 05:49 PM (fx2cy)
54
No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:44 PM (4pwAx)
It’s just playing the odds. I wouldn’t put another D.C. prep school deep state date rapist on the Court, either.
The court needs fierce leadership. How common in history are great female generals? Statistically, I would a guy who fights fights fights.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:44 PM (4pwAx)
It’s just playing the odds. I wouldn’t put another D.C. prep school deep state date rapist on the Court, either.
The court needs fierce leadership. How common in history are great female generals? Statistically, I would a guy who fights fights fights.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:49 PM (l3YAf)
55
To the Left, rule by EO is dictatorial.
To sensible people, rule by judges is tyrannical.
If Congress did it's job, this drama would be avoided. But they are shameless grifters and thieves.
To sensible people, rule by judges is tyrannical.
If Congress did it's job, this drama would be avoided. But they are shameless grifters and thieves.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 05:49 PM (u82oZ)
56
Why can’t a different low court judge rule in the exact opposite way every time too? Rule that trump’s decision must be held?
Posted by: banana Dream at May 15, 2025 05:49 PM (cduTK)
57
Don't like a congressional bill?
Get a district judge to put a TRO on it.
Don't like a law? TRO.
Budget bill doesn't give enough to a vocal minority?
TRO is your friend.
Posted by: AlaBAMA
===
They are not just saying The Executive cannot do something, but also directing action.
POTUS and a super majority Legislature all rolled into one.
They will probably go further and issue TROs on pardons, while directing other be pardoned. Soon.
Get a district judge to put a TRO on it.
Don't like a law? TRO.
Budget bill doesn't give enough to a vocal minority?
TRO is your friend.
Posted by: AlaBAMA
===
They are not just saying The Executive cannot do something, but also directing action.
POTUS and a super majority Legislature all rolled into one.
They will probably go further and issue TROs on pardons, while directing other be pardoned. Soon.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (/lPRQ)
58
Roberts will vote however he wants the "Roberts Court" to be remembered.
Roberts will vote however he wants the "Roberts Court" to be remembered.
Posted by: Frank Barone at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (IifOV)
59
Thomas and Alito are both Boomers, oddly enough…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (PCK5/)
60
How does the U.S. Court of International Trade have any standing to decide tariff issues?
Tariffs (along with taxes, etc.) mainly go to Congress as an Article I, Section 8 power. However, Congress has slowly been handing the reins over to the Executive Branch with numerous Trade Acts.
Did Congress sue the Executive? If not, then the Trade Court is creating a constitutional crisis by arrogating powers to themselves not given under the Constitution or any subsequent law.
THEY are the ones issuing unlawful orders.
Tariffs (along with taxes, etc.) mainly go to Congress as an Article I, Section 8 power. However, Congress has slowly been handing the reins over to the Executive Branch with numerous Trade Acts.
Did Congress sue the Executive? If not, then the Trade Court is creating a constitutional crisis by arrogating powers to themselves not given under the Constitution or any subsequent law.
THEY are the ones issuing unlawful orders.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (HlyYF)
61
Let's remember it was Roberts who gave us a novel new tax!
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (g47mK)
62
I was in law school during the 80s. Had a professor for civil procedure who was a classic Wall Street lawyer. A good friend of Don Regan. He was very against nationwide injunctions as he said it usurped the voters will. He stated at that time that it was going the other way however. This has been brewing since at least then. I think the court will find against nationwide injunctions but side step the citizenship issue, leaving it up to legislation
Posted by: Smell the Glove at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (2ZThz)
63
It’s just playing the odds. I wouldn’t put another D.C. prep school deep state date rapist on the Court, either.
The court needs fierce leadership. How common in history are great female generals? Statistically, I would a guy who fights fights fights.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director
==
No more Jesuits/Catholics either.
I think every single one on the "Right" on the SC falls into this category.
Just saying, the Catholic Church has moved WAY far left.
The court needs fierce leadership. How common in history are great female generals? Statistically, I would a guy who fights fights fights.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director
==
No more Jesuits/Catholics either.
I think every single one on the "Right" on the SC falls into this category.
Just saying, the Catholic Church has moved WAY far left.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (4pwAx)
64
A super Catholic woman, which some confuse with being conservative.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (4pwAx)
The also adopted a couple of Haitians as an AWFL virtue signal. Pretty fuckin’ obvious, wasn’t it?
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM (4pwAx)
The also adopted a couple of Haitians as an AWFL virtue signal. Pretty fuckin’ obvious, wasn’t it?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (l3YAf)
65
Birthright Citizenship is a tax.
Birthright Citizenship is a tax.
Posted by: Chief Justice Roberts. at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (IifOV)
66
35 No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
Posted by: Leupold
Every woman in HR is an embarrassment. And what about those deviant lady fire captains in L.A.?
Posted by: Leupold
Every woman in HR is an embarrassment. And what about those deviant lady fire captains in L.A.?
Posted by: Executive Secretary, Tops! at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (G5+As)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (QXOBW)
68
Why can’t a different low court judge rule in the exact opposite way every time too? Rule that trump’s decision must be held?
Posted by: banana Dream
Secretly, they all aspire to the social circuit in D.C. and are asshole lefty commies.
Posted by: banana Dream
Secretly, they all aspire to the social circuit in D.C. and are asshole lefty commies.
Posted by: BifBewalski - at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (MsrgL)
69
If the Birthright amendment can't be abridged, why can the 2A?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (FZn/N)
70
When the hell did we accumulate all these freakin' neckbeards who've never met a woman they aren't related to?
Sweet Vishnu it's like someone hung a NO MA'AM sign next to the moose out front.
Go pay twenty bucks for a handy or something, it's getting tiresome.
Sweet Vishnu it's like someone hung a NO MA'AM sign next to the moose out front.
Go pay twenty bucks for a handy or something, it's getting tiresome.
Posted by: Warai-otoko at May 15, 2025 05:52 PM (yvnLa)
71
It was Kennedy who gave us Obergefell v. Hodges.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:52 PM (g47mK)
72
I didn't elect these fucking judges, either Dem or Republican and they need to understand they are not kings . They are basically overturning the will of the people.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 05:52 PM (VofaG)
73
Kennedy also gave us Kelo v. City of New London.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (g47mK)
74
I dont know what the SC does on birthright citizenship.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (4pwAx)
75
Bring back the Black Robe Regiment.
Posted by: Judge, Jury and Excutioner at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (VJc7E)
76
A Republic if you can keep it.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (A2D3h)
77
Just saying, the Catholic Church has moved WAY far left.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (4pwAx)
I dunno, where I live the Catholic church I go to is the only church not flying the fag flag. It’s also the only one following 2000 year-old tradition.
Thomas and Alito are the only worthwhile ones. Ketanji is a prot. Kagan is Jewish. Has there ever been a right-wing Jewish justice?
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:51 PM (4pwAx)
I dunno, where I live the Catholic church I go to is the only church not flying the fag flag. It’s also the only one following 2000 year-old tradition.
Thomas and Alito are the only worthwhile ones. Ketanji is a prot. Kagan is Jewish. Has there ever been a right-wing Jewish justice?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:54 PM (l3YAf)
78
We need better Supreme Court Justices.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:54 PM (g47mK)
79
>>> How does the U.S. Court of International Trade have any standing to decide tariff issues?
It's fucking Clown World, man.
It's fucking Clown World, man.
Posted by: Max Power at May 15, 2025 05:54 PM (q177U)
80
@73 Kelo was written by John Paul Stevens
Posted by: Smell the Glove at May 15, 2025 05:55 PM (2ZThz)
81
SC can justify lower court's poisonous decision is what they can do.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:55 PM (g47mK)
82
Anyone else remember when the state of California voted 2-1 to eliminate all public benefits for illegals - and the entire referendum was overturned by one Federal judge ?
And that was that.
And that was that.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:55 PM (Uc8km)
83
Kennedy tipped the scale.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:55 PM (g47mK)
84
The ruling will probably split the baby by limiting a district courts ability to issue TROs but hold that the one’s restraining Trumps agenda a totes cool because reasons and penumbras.
Posted by: Thomas Bender at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (GhgAD)
85
I think all oral arguments should end with the quiet words of Louis CK "I'm gonna masterbate, and think of you; and there's nothing you can do about it."
Posted by: Field Marshal Zhukov at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (wBaIH)
86
Has there ever been a right-wing Jewish justice?
80% of them vote Democrat, so it's highly unlikely.
The only longer odds demographically would be blacks, though Thomas shows that it's technically possible.
80% of them vote Democrat, so it's highly unlikely.
The only longer odds demographically would be blacks, though Thomas shows that it's technically possible.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (8hq5W)
87
Testing birthright citizenship is a globalist nightmare. Its not very defensible in the constitution, but its critical to their plans.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (2VST1)
88
If conservative justices had engaged in this during the Obama years where some red state district stopped all the bailouts, TARP, etc, they would have put a stop to it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (4pwAx)
89
Let's remember it was Roberts who gave us a novel new tax!
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (g47mK)
Yeah, but at least we’ve had some good right-wing male judges, even if they’re rare. Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Rehnquist.
We’ve had zero good female judges. Nobody’s saying all male judges are good, just that you should play the odds.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (g47mK)
Yeah, but at least we’ve had some good right-wing male judges, even if they’re rare. Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Rehnquist.
We’ve had zero good female judges. Nobody’s saying all male judges are good, just that you should play the odds.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 05:57 PM (l3YAf)
90
I bet it will be a wishy-washy decision that stops nothing
Posted by: Skip at May 15, 2025 05:57 PM (ypFCm)
91
You would be surprised to hear that Trump is facing the same court intransigence as FDR did. He really wanted to screw them by expanding the court.
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 05:57 PM (g47mK)
92
Wisconsin Judge Pleads Not Guilty After Grand Jury Indictment, Claims 'Judicial Immunity' For Hiding Illegal From ICE
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 05:58 PM (RHGPo)
93
A Trump judge should put out a national TRO blocking any other national TROs.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 05:58 PM (8avO+)
94
Anyone else remember when the state of California voted 2-1 to eliminate all public benefits for illegals - and the entire referendum was overturned by one Federal judge ?
And that was that.
_-----------------
Same with Prop 8. Then the homo marriages splurged on ahead.
And that was that.
_-----------------
Same with Prop 8. Then the homo marriages splurged on ahead.
Posted by: Judge, Jury and Excutioner at May 15, 2025 05:58 PM (VJc7E)
95
Trump needs to begin discussing the expansion of the Supreme Court.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (8hq5W)
96
Aren't there 'white papers' or opinions during the debate on this amendment that basically lays out the intent of the amendment?
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (VofaG)
97
35 No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025
David Souter on line 1 for you.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025
David Souter on line 1 for you.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (p4NUW)
98
Women are just wired to be liberal. I have a house full of women, just the way they are.
Common sense is "mean", etc. And they hate being on the outside of popular opinion.
Obviously there are exceptions, but I mean even the Bible doesn't seem to want women in leadership positions.
Common sense is "mean", etc. And they hate being on the outside of popular opinion.
Obviously there are exceptions, but I mean even the Bible doesn't seem to want women in leadership positions.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (4pwAx)
99
That this case even has to be brought is the height of absurdity.
Posted by: Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (6YdsJ)
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM (L/fGl)
101
The Wide Latina is already expanding.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (A2D3h)
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (2VST1)
103
Testing birthright citizenship is a globalist nightmare. Its not very defensible in the constitution, but its critical to their plans.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (2VST1)
plans, pfft. Wishcasting.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 05:56 PM (2VST1)
plans, pfft. Wishcasting.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (8avO+)
104
A super Catholic woman, which some confuse with being conservative.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM
We sent our kids to Catholic school even though we are not Catholic, since it was so much better than our public schools.
My wife and I were instantly embraced by the entire parish.
I was later shocked to learn that in 2008, 68% of Catholics voted for Obama.
The Catholics I knew were at least 90% proto-MAGA.
I finally asked a few people about this. Turns out our neighborhood parish is almost certainly the most conservative out of most of the surrounding portion of the state.
Catholics (like everyone else) are not a monolithic group.
I have no problem supporting a Catholic in the future, but be sure to make it a MAGA one!
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:48 PM
We sent our kids to Catholic school even though we are not Catholic, since it was so much better than our public schools.
My wife and I were instantly embraced by the entire parish.
I was later shocked to learn that in 2008, 68% of Catholics voted for Obama.
The Catholics I knew were at least 90% proto-MAGA.
I finally asked a few people about this. Turns out our neighborhood parish is almost certainly the most conservative out of most of the surrounding portion of the state.
Catholics (like everyone else) are not a monolithic group.
I have no problem supporting a Catholic in the future, but be sure to make it a MAGA one!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (HlyYF)
105
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Dugan is the former Executive Director of Catholic Charities USA, that has taken tens of millions of dollars from the government to flood the country with illegals while the Pope cheered it all on.
Dugan is the former Executive Director of Catholic Charities USA, that has taken tens of millions of dollars from the government to flood the country with illegals while the Pope cheered it all on.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:01 PM (8hq5W)
106
Same with Prop 8. Then the homo marriages splurged on ahead.
Posted by: Judge, Jury and Excutioner
===
With a gay justice helping.
They first said "you have to allow gay marriage", then CA came back with a Constitutional Amendment saying "no gay marriage" and the gay justice once again said that's unconstitutional.
Posted by: Judge, Jury and Excutioner
===
With a gay justice helping.
They first said "you have to allow gay marriage", then CA came back with a Constitutional Amendment saying "no gay marriage" and the gay justice once again said that's unconstitutional.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 06:01 PM (4pwAx)
107
Lethal Lidar: Volvo SUV's Infrared Beam Fries Smartphone Camera
Elon Musk famously called LiDAR a "crutch," arguing that camera vision powered by advanced AI is sufficient for FSD
I have a friend who did his Masters based on LIDAR. After getting into the private sector, he said a good camera can do better.
Elon Musk famously called LiDAR a "crutch," arguing that camera vision powered by advanced AI is sufficient for FSD
I have a friend who did his Masters based on LIDAR. After getting into the private sector, he said a good camera can do better.
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (RHGPo)
108
We need better Supreme Court Justices.
--------
We need a better population, but this is who we are.
Sadly, this is it. I know most here absolutely revere the Constitution and Bil of Rights.
To me, the former was a reasonable idea and the latter a pipe dream. Because no set of rules is going to constrain a majority of people that either don't care or are dead-set against them. That's just not how human behavior works.
--------
We need a better population, but this is who we are.
Sadly, this is it. I know most here absolutely revere the Constitution and Bil of Rights.
To me, the former was a reasonable idea and the latter a pipe dream. Because no set of rules is going to constrain a majority of people that either don't care or are dead-set against them. That's just not how human behavior works.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (Uc8km)
109
These rulings have long been considered out-of-bounds -- including by Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who argued against universal injunctions issued by district courts when she was Obama's Solicitor General.
She has a different opinion now, of course.
-----------------
[Among her remarks in 2022 @ Northwestern University's Law School:] “It just can’t be right that one District Judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.”
youtube.com/watch?v=9AWZcsp6wGc
She has a different opinion now, of course.
-----------------
[Among her remarks in 2022 @ Northwestern University's Law School:] “It just can’t be right that one District Judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.”
youtube.com/watch?v=9AWZcsp6wGc
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:03 PM (cSz/v)
110
I have no problem supporting a Catholic in the future, but be sure to make it a MAGA one!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (HlyYF)
“Catholic” is a cultural thing. I meet a lot of “Catholics” who haven’t been to Mass in 20 years but still call themselves Catholic.
According to polls, something like 2/3rds of Catholics don’t believe Christ is really present in the Eucharist. But they’re not the ones attending Mass.
Go to a Latin Mass and tell me those kids aren’t conservative.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (HlyYF)
“Catholic” is a cultural thing. I meet a lot of “Catholics” who haven’t been to Mass in 20 years but still call themselves Catholic.
According to polls, something like 2/3rds of Catholics don’t believe Christ is really present in the Eucharist. But they’re not the ones attending Mass.
Go to a Latin Mass and tell me those kids aren’t conservative.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:03 PM (l3YAf)
111
Anyone else remember when the state of California voted 2-1 to eliminate all public benefits for illegals - and the entire referendum was overturned by one Federal judge ?
---------
The city of San frickin' Cisco voted to reduce assistance to homeless from $400/mo (attractive nuisance) to $40/mo and it was overturned by a judge because the voters were being big meanies.
---------
The city of San frickin' Cisco voted to reduce assistance to homeless from $400/mo (attractive nuisance) to $40/mo and it was overturned by a judge because the voters were being big meanies.
Posted by: Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea at May 15, 2025 06:03 PM (6YdsJ)
112
Roberts will vote however he wants the "Roberts Court" to be remembered.
Posted by: Frank Barone at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (IifOV)
He better think well, because this can't go on for long. He has admitted being in opposition without mentioning a law being violated. His own subordinates are out of control and ignoring him.
Posted by: Frank Barone at May 15, 2025 05:50 PM (IifOV)
He better think well, because this can't go on for long. He has admitted being in opposition without mentioning a law being violated. His own subordinates are out of control and ignoring him.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:04 PM (8avO+)
113
Ugh...
they're making/made another live-action He-Man movie. And guess what? "Teela" wears pants.
Who is Teela, you cave-dwellers axe? Here:
https://is.gd/gfYKAX
Ugh...
they're making/made another live-action He-Man movie. And guess what? "Teela" wears pants.
Who is Teela, you cave-dwellers axe? Here:
https://is.gd/gfYKAX
Posted by: Soothsayer's Innaccurate but Amusing Bigoted Facts at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (UqjAj)
114
92 Wisconsin Judge Pleads Not Guilty After Grand Jury Indictment, Claims 'Judicial Immunity' For Hiding Illegal From ICE
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 05:58 PM
IANAL, but I believe "judicial immunity" only applies to civil charges. She is facing CRIMINAL charges, and her lawyer argued to drop the charges based on a legal precedent that is NOT applicable to her circumstances.
Of course, Leftist judges need only a fig leaf to dispense justice, rather than any well-established legal precedents or statutes.
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 05:58 PM
IANAL, but I believe "judicial immunity" only applies to civil charges. She is facing CRIMINAL charges, and her lawyer argued to drop the charges based on a legal precedent that is NOT applicable to her circumstances.
Of course, Leftist judges need only a fig leaf to dispense justice, rather than any well-established legal precedents or statutes.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (HlyYF)
115
Please list for me all of the bad conservative female SCOTUS judges throughout history. Because the females on the court have been liberals, except ACB who is okay about 60% of the time. She just looks annoying.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
116
Wisconsin Judge Pleads Not Guilty After Grand Jury Indictment, Claims 'Judicial Immunity' For Hiding Illegal From ICE
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Posted by: SMOD
Tried to claim total immunity due to official acts. The problem is, committing a felony by adding in a bedding at a illegal, is not an official act.
Dugan was charged with obstructing or impeding a proceeding...
Posted by: SMOD
Tried to claim total immunity due to official acts. The problem is, committing a felony by adding in a bedding at a illegal, is not an official act.
Posted by: rickb223 at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (QXOBW)
117
To me, the former was a reasonable idea and the latter a pipe dream. Because no set of rules is going to constrain a majority of people that either don't care or are dead-set against them. That's just not how human behavior works.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (Uc8km)
It’s all words on paper until somebody picks up a gun.
The words in the Constitution were ignored from the get-go, and these days bare no resemblance to our Gay Communist form of government.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (Uc8km)
It’s all words on paper until somebody picks up a gun.
The words in the Constitution were ignored from the get-go, and these days bare no resemblance to our Gay Communist form of government.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (l3YAf)
118
Birthright never imagined birth tourism or the illegal invasion, just as the 2A never foresaw f-15s or SAMs. Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N)
119
Lethal Lidar: Volvo SUV's Infrared Beam Fries Smartphone Camera
Elon Musk famously called LiDAR a "crutch," arguing that camera vision powered by advanced AI is sufficient for FSD
I have a friend who did his Masters based on LIDAR. After getting into the private sector, he said a good camera can do better.
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (RHGPo)
Infared is gonna be blurrier than visible light by its wavelength.
Elon Musk famously called LiDAR a "crutch," arguing that camera vision powered by advanced AI is sufficient for FSD
I have a friend who did his Masters based on LIDAR. After getting into the private sector, he said a good camera can do better.
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM (RHGPo)
Infared is gonna be blurrier than visible light by its wavelength.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:06 PM (8avO+)
120
“It just can’t be right that one District Judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.”
Then somebody inform me why a solicitor doesn't use that quote against her in the argument ?
Then somebody inform me why a solicitor doesn't use that quote against her in the argument ?
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:06 PM (Uc8km)
121
Ke r p saying another Cultural Marxist on the Supreme Court would destroy the country.
Even now every decision is a toss up
Even now every decision is a toss up
Posted by: Skip at May 15, 2025 06:06 PM (ypFCm)
122
97 35 No more women on the Supreme Court. Please and thank you. Every one of them are an embarrassment.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025
David Souter on line 1 for you.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM
Good point, Piper.
OTOH, are we sure Souter was actually a man?
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025
David Souter on line 1 for you.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 05:59 PM
Good point, Piper.
OTOH, are we sure Souter was actually a man?
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:06 PM (HlyYF)
123
Birthright never imagined birth tourism or the illegal invasion, just as the 2A never foresaw f-15s or SAMs. Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (VofaG)
124
Please list for me all of the bad conservative female SCOTUS judges throughout history. Because the females on the court have been liberals, except ACB who is okay about 60% of the time. She just looks annoying.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Sandra Day O’Connor. Appointed by Reagan. First female SCOTUS justice.
Total squish.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Sandra Day O’Connor. Appointed by Reagan. First female SCOTUS justice.
Total squish.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (l3YAf)
125
Women are just wired to be liberal. I have a house full of women, just the way they are.
Its not a bad inclination, it just needs to be controlled and balanced with reason and truth.
Its like men if we are left by ourselves, we tend over time to get more brutal, filthy, and crude. We need the influence of women, too to balance us out.
but modern culture women are entirely unchecked, they dominate culture and society, and any attempt to balance that out or shape it is treated as TOXIC PATRIARCHY!!!!
Its not a bad inclination, it just needs to be controlled and balanced with reason and truth.
Its like men if we are left by ourselves, we tend over time to get more brutal, filthy, and crude. We need the influence of women, too to balance us out.
but modern culture women are entirely unchecked, they dominate culture and society, and any attempt to balance that out or shape it is treated as TOXIC PATRIARCHY!!!!
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (2VST1)
126
Please list for me all of the bad conservative female SCOTUS judges throughout history. Because the females on the court have been liberals, except ACB who is okay about 60% of the time. She just looks annoying.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Conservative females are like unicorns. I'm told they exist. I've just personally never seen one.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Conservative females are like unicorns. I'm told they exist. I've just personally never seen one.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (Uc8km)
127
Please list for me all of the bad conservative female SCOTUS judges throughout history. Because the females on the court have been liberals, except ACB who is okay about 60% of the time. She just looks annoying.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Not on SCOTUS, but the judge who said Trump can use the Aliens act was a woman.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (p4NUW)
Not on SCOTUS, but the judge who said Trump can use the Aliens act was a woman.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (8avO+)
128
Note, once more this is the Court and only the Court, deciding what Powers the Court has.
Congress 'could' reign in Judicial over reach... but are not even holding hearings about it...
Prediction? The Roberts court will not limit the Courts power... the very power that is gave them under the rules written by the Supreme Court.
Congress 'could' reign in Judicial over reach... but are not even holding hearings about it...
Prediction? The Roberts court will not limit the Courts power... the very power that is gave them under the rules written by the Supreme Court.
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (mP0Kj)
129
74 I dont know what the SC does on birthright citizenship.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (4pwAx)
At best a 5-4 majority will vote to rule birthright citizenship for babies born to illegals on US soil is unconstitutional because this was not the intent of the writers and approvers of the 14th Amendment. But all children born to illegals before the date of the decision are grandfathered as US citizens.
I rate the above as a low probability. I believe a majority will say the 14th means what previous courts said it means.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (4pwAx)
At best a 5-4 majority will vote to rule birthright citizenship for babies born to illegals on US soil is unconstitutional because this was not the intent of the writers and approvers of the 14th Amendment. But all children born to illegals before the date of the decision are grandfathered as US citizens.
I rate the above as a low probability. I believe a majority will say the 14th means what previous courts said it means.
Posted by: Gref at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (aBgBM)
130
>> She has a different opinion now, of course.
Go F yourself, ACB. She’s quite possibly the worst justice ever picked by a Republican president. The country has been in crisis. The constitutional system is under attack. You have one job, but instead of doing it you subvert the system and add to the destruction.
What a piece of shit.
Go F yourself, ACB. She’s quite possibly the worst justice ever picked by a Republican president. The country has been in crisis. The constitutional system is under attack. You have one job, but instead of doing it you subvert the system and add to the destruction.
What a piece of shit.
Posted by: Vengeance at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (hfDAg)
131
The Second Ammendment wasn't about short sleeve shirts?
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (A2D3h)
132
Sandra Day O’Connor. Appointed by Reagan. First female SCOTUS justice. Total squish.
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (Uc8km)
133
This taking everything to a judge to rule on is just the Beltway's plan to stop Trump from doing his job. It's childish and stupid and their plan we all know this, they aren't fooling anybody. The Beltway does not want Trump in office, damn the voters. They run the country not the people. I HATE their attitude. They should not hold any government office. And if there was a way to kick them out I would be all for it. I would stand up and applaud it.
Posted by: Case at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (Qdqx6)
134
Seems normal.
>>@EricLDaugh
>>🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: FBI official tells us the Bureau has been made aware of this post from James Comey calling to "86 47."
>>The White House said it's being taken "seriously" and described it as "what can clearly be interpreted as 'a HIT' on the sitting President of the United States."
>>James Comey here knows that he has insane followers and knows the message this phrasing sends.
>>@EricLDaugh
>>🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: FBI official tells us the Bureau has been made aware of this post from James Comey calling to "86 47."
>>The White House said it's being taken "seriously" and described it as "what can clearly be interpreted as 'a HIT' on the sitting President of the United States."
>>James Comey here knows that he has insane followers and knows the message this phrasing sends.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (viF8m)
135
Birthright never imagined birth tourism or the illegal invasion, just as the 2A never foresaw f-15s or SAMs. Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: polynikes
Apples and oranges. Second amendment was designed for military weapons for the people. Most cannons were privately owned.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: polynikes
Apples and oranges. Second amendment was designed for military weapons for the people. Most cannons were privately owned.
Posted by: rickb223 at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (QXOBW)
136
Kagan showed that she was nothing but a leftist when she didn't because herself from the Obamacare decision, despite the fact that she was involved in crafting the legal arguments while she was Solicitor General
Posted by: Smell the Glove at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (2ZThz)
137
Go F yourself, ACB. She’s quite possibly the worst justice ever picked by a Republican president.
Hi !!!
Hi !!!
Posted by: David Souter at May 15, 2025 06:10 PM (Uc8km)
138
The Second Ammendment wasn't about short sleeve shirts?
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (A2D3h)
--------
The right to arm bears. The Yogi clause.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (A2D3h)
--------
The right to arm bears. The Yogi clause.
Posted by: Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea at May 15, 2025 06:10 PM (6YdsJ)
139
I have a friend who did his Masters based on LIDAR. After getting into the private sector, he said a good camera can do better.
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM
I love LIDAR for surface topography measurements ... even through tree cover.
It is so accurate (in that application), that I can plan construction projects at our farm, and only bring out the laser level for the final elevations.
Posted by: SMOD at May 15, 2025 06:02 PM
I love LIDAR for surface topography measurements ... even through tree cover.
It is so accurate (in that application), that I can plan construction projects at our farm, and only bring out the laser level for the final elevations.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:10 PM (HlyYF)
140
Recuse.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:10 PM (A2D3h)
141
Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Based on the writings, context, and practice of the country under the founders... you ought to be able to, if you can afford it.
Based on the writings, context, and practice of the country under the founders... you ought to be able to, if you can afford it.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:10 PM (2VST1)
142
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM (Uc8km)
No conservative women on ASHQ? Well, technically maybe you haven't actually seen any of us.
No conservative women on ASHQ? Well, technically maybe you haven't actually seen any of us.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (fx2cy)
143
If I don't like it then I'll put a TRO on it
If I don't like it then I'll put a TRO on it
I'll be President though you didn't vote for it
If I don't like it then I'll put a TRO on it
If I don't like it then I'll put a TRO on it
I'll be President though you didn't vote for it
If I don't like it then I'll put a TRO on it
Posted by: Judge Beyonce at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (TbWk/)
144
No it won't. Barrett will side with the other women, because that's what Barrett is going to do the rest of her time on the court - and what she was destined to do when she was appointed. No woman is going to go against the consensus of three other women in any group.
When faced with a 4-4 tie, Roberts will side with the four liberals. Because that's what Roberts does. And he doesn't want to be unpopular in his social circle.
The End.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (Uc8km)
------------------
Meaning: Roberts will, per usual, side with the other four women on the court.
When faced with a 4-4 tie, Roberts will side with the four liberals. Because that's what Roberts does. And he doesn't want to be unpopular in his social circle.
The End.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 05:39 PM (Uc8km)
------------------
Meaning: Roberts will, per usual, side with the other four women on the court.
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (cSz/v)
145
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (Uc8km)
They always do. 😔
“International law” is the Communist Manifesto for law-cels.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (Uc8km)
They always do. 😔
“International law” is the Communist Manifesto for law-cels.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (l3YAf)
146
Recuse not because. Damn autocucumber
Posted by: Smell the Glove at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (2ZThz)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:11 PM (u82oZ)
148
My word is the law.
Posted by: Judge Reinhold at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (dIske)
149
The US courts, delenda est.
At a time when constitutional order is needed most, you have clowns like ACB unable, unwilling and too cowardly to protect it.
I’m frankly glad they haven’t taken a 2A case. These people seem determined to undermine the Bill of Rights and only increase their own power.
At a time when constitutional order is needed most, you have clowns like ACB unable, unwilling and too cowardly to protect it.
I’m frankly glad they haven’t taken a 2A case. These people seem determined to undermine the Bill of Rights and only increase their own power.
Posted by: Marcus T at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (V5pka)
150
At best a 5-4 majority will vote to rule birthright citizenship for babies born to illegals on US soil is unconstitutional because this was not the intent of the writers and approvers of the 14th Amendment. But all children born to illegals before the date of the decision are grandfathered as US citizens.
I rate the above as a low probability. I believe a majority will say the 14th means what previous courts said it means.
Posted by: Gref
===
Which, IIRC, renders half the 14th completely incoherent or meaningless. This would be the key half.
I rate the above as a low probability. I believe a majority will say the 14th means what previous courts said it means.
Posted by: Gref
===
Which, IIRC, renders half the 14th completely incoherent or meaningless. This would be the key half.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (/lPRQ)
151
Birthright never imagined birth tourism or the illegal invasion, just as the 2A never foresaw f-15s or SAMs. Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Under the Founders, you could buy Cannon... and have Private Artillery. Privately owned ships were armed with Cannons as well...
In fact, the Revolutionary war STARTED when the Brits were trying to go and confiscate privately owned arme and Ammunition, including Cannons...
So... yes...
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Under the Founders, you could buy Cannon... and have Private Artillery. Privately owned ships were armed with Cannons as well...
In fact, the Revolutionary war STARTED when the Brits were trying to go and confiscate privately owned arme and Ammunition, including Cannons...
So... yes...
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (mP0Kj)
152
I dont know what the SC does on birthright citizenship.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (4pwAx)
Nonsense. Birthright has been status quo for 50 years or more. Its the illegal immigration encouragement and welfare and cash grants that made the problem worse.
If they rule you do indeed get automatic citizenship even if you're born here to an illegal, it will overwhelm the system even more. Has major consequences and Congress could never fix it.
Posted by: Leupold at May 15, 2025 05:53 PM (4pwAx)
Nonsense. Birthright has been status quo for 50 years or more. Its the illegal immigration encouragement and welfare and cash grants that made the problem worse.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (8avO+)
153
LIDAR is proving to be a great tool in land survey. I am new to it (previous company was barely aware of it), but I really like it.
Posted by: Pug Mahon at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (0aYVJ)
154
132 Sandra Day O’Connor. Appointed by Reagan. First female SCOTUS justice. Total squish.
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May
I totally forgot about her, I concede that one. I also counter that the male judges - Roberts, Gorsuch, Souter, etc prove our issues is probably not female, but the caliber of person being churned out of law schools.
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May
I totally forgot about her, I concede that one. I also counter that the male judges - Roberts, Gorsuch, Souter, etc prove our issues is probably not female, but the caliber of person being churned out of law schools.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (QzINz)
155
In general, Men rely on logic. Women rely on feelings.
Oil and water situation.
Men though logically figure out that if they want the P they just concede the argument.
Oil and water situation.
Men though logically figure out that if they want the P they just concede the argument.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:13 PM (VofaG)
156
141: But I can't . So birthright should be limited to the offspring of ciitizens and green card holders.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:13 PM (FZn/N)
157
Go to a Latin Mass and tell me those kids aren’t conservative.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:03 PM
Except of course for the younger FBI agents that were at Latin Mass monitoring 83 y.o. Catholic ladies for their well know terrorist proclivities!
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:03 PM
Except of course for the younger FBI agents that were at Latin Mass monitoring 83 y.o. Catholic ladies for their well know terrorist proclivities!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:13 PM (HlyYF)
158
We need a better population, but this is who we are.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (2VST1)
I don't think the problem is "the people." Except to the extent that we bought into the notion that our government is benevolent, and that our elites and oligarchs are patriotic.
People just want to live, and sometimes we make bad decision, when left to our own devices (like who we elect). What we expect is a class of people working on our behalf, to help guide us to not do stupid things, politically.
The Constitution called for that. But while we were sleeping, DC and the corporate elites pissed all over the document, and perverted the rule of law.
People generally only have one recourse, when that happens.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:00 PM (2VST1)
I don't think the problem is "the people." Except to the extent that we bought into the notion that our government is benevolent, and that our elites and oligarchs are patriotic.
People just want to live, and sometimes we make bad decision, when left to our own devices (like who we elect). What we expect is a class of people working on our behalf, to help guide us to not do stupid things, politically.
The Constitution called for that. But while we were sleeping, DC and the corporate elites pissed all over the document, and perverted the rule of law.
People generally only have one recourse, when that happens.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:13 PM (dGCAG)
159
149 The US courts, delenda est.
At a time when constitutional order is needed most, you have clowns like ACB unable, unwilling and too cowardly to protect it.
I’m frankly glad they haven’t taken a 2A case. These people seem determined to undermine the Bill of Rights and only increase their own power.
Posted by: Marcus T at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (V5pka)
Courts being useful for ensuring our Liberty, died during Covid.
At a time when constitutional order is needed most, you have clowns like ACB unable, unwilling and too cowardly to protect it.
I’m frankly glad they haven’t taken a 2A case. These people seem determined to undermine the Bill of Rights and only increase their own power.
Posted by: Marcus T at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (V5pka)
Courts being useful for ensuring our Liberty, died during Covid.
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 15, 2025 06:14 PM (mP0Kj)
160
141: Or if we conquer and annex Canada, people born in our new territory are citizens.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:14 PM (FZn/N)
161
Its like men if we are left by ourselves, we tend over time to get more brutal, filthy, and crude. We need the influence of women, too to balance us out.
Survivor: Battle of the Sexes proves this statement to be incorrect.
Survivor: Battle of the Sexes proves this statement to be incorrect.
Posted by: The men made shelter and a keg cooler, the women made a mess at May 15, 2025 06:14 PM (TbWk/)
162
In general, Men rely on logic. Women rely on feelings.
Oil and water situation.
Men though logically figure out that if they want the P they just concede the argument.
Posted by: polynikes
Make whorehouses legal again.
Oil and water situation.
Men though logically figure out that if they want the P they just concede the argument.
Posted by: polynikes
Make whorehouses legal again.
Posted by: rickb223 at May 15, 2025 06:14 PM (QXOBW)
163
>>🚨 BREAKING UPDATE: FBI official tells us the Bureau has been made aware of this post from James Comey calling to "86 47."
>>The White House said it's being taken "seriously" and described it as "what can clearly be interpreted as 'a HIT' on the sitting President of the United States."
>>James Comey here knows that he has insane followers and knows the message this phrasing sends.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (viF8m)
------------------
Sounds like calling for and incitement to Presidential assassination; I think the Secret Service should give him a figurative and literal proctological exam.
>>The White House said it's being taken "seriously" and described it as "what can clearly be interpreted as 'a HIT' on the sitting President of the United States."
>>James Comey here knows that he has insane followers and knows the message this phrasing sends.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:09 PM (viF8m)
------------------
Sounds like calling for and incitement to Presidential assassination; I think the Secret Service should give him a figurative and literal proctological exam.
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (Xu+7e)
164
In my experience, women are a mixed bag… men too, really… I see more erosion of “ maleness” overall in our time and it’s a very bad thing indeed.. so, nature abhors a vacuum, and guess who is filling the maleness vacuum???
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (PCK5/)
165
The Republican presidents picking bad SC judges goes way back . Ike picked both Earl Warren and William Brennan. Nixon appointed Blackmun who gave us Roe.
Posted by: Smell the Glove at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (2ZThz)
166
At a time when constitutional order is needed most, you have clowns like ACB unable, unwilling and too cowardly to protect it.
They never turn down the apple, bro.
All you can do is keep yourself from becoming entangled in their mistakes.
They never turn down the apple, bro.
All you can do is keep yourself from becoming entangled in their mistakes.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (8hq5W)
167
123 Birthright never imagined birth tourism or the illegal invasion, just as the 2A never foresaw f-15s or SAMs. Why can't I buy a SAM or 2?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM
Personally, I wouldn't mind owning a couple of Stinger missiles for the day the next "Biden" drooling idiot sends out the F-15s to get me.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:05 PM (FZn/N
Because you can't bear them as an individual?
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM
Personally, I wouldn't mind owning a couple of Stinger missiles for the day the next "Biden" drooling idiot sends out the F-15s to get me.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (HlyYF)
168
Tell me again why we have a President ?
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (VE6XX)
169
Half of Congress is fine with Political Commissar Judges making the rules they don't have to
Posted by: Skip at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (ypFCm)
170
At best a 5-4 majority will vote to rule birthright citizenship for babies born to illegals on US soil is unconstitutional because this was not the intent of the writers and approvers of the 14th Amendment. But all children born to illegals before the date of the decision are grandfathered as US citizens.
Yeah this is the best we can hope for and its probably a fair compromise. Taking away citizenship retroactively would be a violation of the spirit of the constitution even if not written exactly.
I don't think the problem is "the people." Except to the extent that we bought into the notion that our government is benevolent, and that our elites and oligarchs are patriotic.
Well see the thing is, all of those judges are selected from among the people. If your population isn't much good, your representatives won't be either.
Yeah this is the best we can hope for and its probably a fair compromise. Taking away citizenship retroactively would be a violation of the spirit of the constitution even if not written exactly.
I don't think the problem is "the people." Except to the extent that we bought into the notion that our government is benevolent, and that our elites and oligarchs are patriotic.
Well see the thing is, all of those judges are selected from among the people. If your population isn't much good, your representatives won't be either.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (2VST1)
171
Just appoint 17 plumbers and engineers to the court. Problem solved.
First of the new class who interrupts oral arguments to say “Daylight’s burning. Is anyone going to get some actual work done today, or are you faggots going to jaw until sundown?” gets to be Chief Justice.
First of the new class who interrupts oral arguments to say “Daylight’s burning. Is anyone going to get some actual work done today, or are you faggots going to jaw until sundown?” gets to be Chief Justice.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (l3YAf)
172
167. Of course, and we should be able to form cooperatives.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (FZn/N)
173
Not on SCOTUS, but the judge who said Trump can use the Aliens act was a woman.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
174
James Comey has lost his mind.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (VofaG)
175
Conservative females are like unicorns. I'm told they exist. I've just personally never seen one.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM
Come to a MoMe, where you can witness the majestic dance of the unicorns while observing them in their native environment!
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:07 PM
Come to a MoMe, where you can witness the majestic dance of the unicorns while observing them in their native environment!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (HlyYF)
176
174 James Comey has lost his mind.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (VofaG)
Can ya lose something you never had to begin with?
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (VofaG)
Can ya lose something you never had to begin with?
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (mP0Kj)
Posted by: four seasons at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (3ek7K)
178
I think the Secret Service should give him a figurative and literal proctological exam.
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (Xu+7e
--------
His crap is reputed to smell like cedar and fiddlehead ferns.
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:16 PM (Xu+7e
--------
His crap is reputed to smell like cedar and fiddlehead ferns.
Posted by: Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (6YdsJ)
179
Why the fuck are we even bothering with the charade that elections - or the will of the voter - even matters.
Seriously.
Seriously.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (K6DGR)
180
Something sick about ACB. Even Sotomayor seems to have a coherent agenda. ACB seems deranged.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (FZn/N)
181
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies
Yeah its not like there are no good female judges. There are precious few good male ones.
Yeah its not like there are no good female judges. There are precious few good male ones.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (2VST1)
182
Well see the thing is, all of those judges are selected from among the people. If your population isn't much good, your representatives won't be either.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (2VST1)
That's not true. Those judges are lawyers. Not people.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (2VST1)
That's not true. Those judges are lawyers. Not people.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (dGCAG)
183
More Chardonnay?
Posted by: Lies! Lies! at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (QSrLX)
184
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
There are just as many Men who are dimwitted screeching buffoons...
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
There are just as many Men who are dimwitted screeching buffoons...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (VE6XX)
185
173
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
The screeching part is what interrupts my deep thoughts…
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
The screeching part is what interrupts my deep thoughts…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (PCK5/)
Posted by: Hour of the Wolf at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (VNX3d)
187
184
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
There are just as many Men who are dimwitted screeching buffoons...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (VE6XX)
Stop picking on me!!!!!
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
There are just as many Men who are dimwitted screeching buffoons...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:19 PM (VE6XX)
Stop picking on me!!!!!
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (PCK5/)
188
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
Thanks for fighting the good fight, Piper. 😊 I'm going to leave for the evening now and avoid Misogyny hour(s).
Thanks for fighting the good fight, Piper. 😊 I'm going to leave for the evening now and avoid Misogyny hour(s).
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (fx2cy)
189
Pillage Idiot, check your email please
Posted by: Ben Had at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (NVNRw)
190
According to Christopher Taylor we are all "unchecked."
Unchecked is probably a poor word, because it might lead someone uncharitably to assume that means "uncontrolled" or "undisciplined." What I meant was that as I stated, both men and women have strengths that can go wrong if not balanced and informed by the other.
And in current society... that's not happening with women.
Unchecked is probably a poor word, because it might lead someone uncharitably to assume that means "uncontrolled" or "undisciplined." What I meant was that as I stated, both men and women have strengths that can go wrong if not balanced and informed by the other.
And in current society... that's not happening with women.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (2VST1)
191
Chicks on the bench, amirite?
Posted by: Josephistan at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (sl8Ar)
192
United States Court of International trade ? They can tell the POTUS what tariffs he can do ?
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (VE6XX)
193
Well see the thing is, all of those judges are selected from among the people. If your population isn't much good, your representatives won't be either.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (2VST1)
They're presidentially appointed then approved or disapproved by the Senate. It is an inherently political process for one, and you are also generally going to get people who tend more towards statism who work in that arena and who catch the attention of (especially Democrat) presidents.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (2VST1)
They're presidentially appointed then approved or disapproved by the Senate. It is an inherently political process for one, and you are also generally going to get people who tend more towards statism who work in that arena and who catch the attention of (especially Democrat) presidents.
Posted by: The pool is polluted, deliberately so at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (TbWk/)
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (L/fGl)
195
{{{Piper}}}
You and the Horde women are wonderful exceptions. But there is something wrong with our "elites" having mental illness.
You and the Horde women are wonderful exceptions. But there is something wrong with our "elites" having mental illness.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (u82oZ)
196
There are just as many Men who are dimwitted screeching buffoons...
Posted by: It's me donna
Why not bonobos ?
Posted by: It's me donna
Why not bonobos ?
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (/lPRQ)
Posted by: four seasons at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (3ek7K)
198
180 Something sick about ACB. Even Sotomayor seems to have a coherent agenda. ACB seems deranged.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (FZn/N)
I would suggest.. menopause, but I would be shot, so I will not…
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (FZn/N)
I would suggest.. menopause, but I would be shot, so I will not…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (PCK5/)
199
Stop picking on me!!!!!
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (PCK5
O.k. You made me laugh. I love you in a totally sister in Christ sort of way.
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (PCK5
O.k. You made me laugh. I love you in a totally sister in Christ sort of way.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (fx2cy)
200
...issuing what he purports to be nationwide "universal" injunctions.
Ultimately, such an injunction is national suicide.
Ultimately, such an injunction is national suicide.
Posted by: Diogenes at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (8jLWb)
201
175
Come to a MoMe, where you can witness the majestic dance of the unicorns while observing them in their native environment!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025
And by native environment you mean on the range, right?
Come to a MoMe, where you can witness the majestic dance of the unicorns while observing them in their native environment!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025
And by native environment you mean on the range, right?
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (QzINz)
202
The legitimacy of so called birthright citizenship hinges on one simple thing - the good faith, or lack thereof, of the birther.
And I think that it is self evident - FUCKING SELF EVIDENT - that no such good faith exists in this equation. It is nothing more than economic parasitism. Nothing more.
IMHFO.
And I think that it is self evident - FUCKING SELF EVIDENT - that no such good faith exists in this equation. It is nothing more than economic parasitism. Nothing more.
IMHFO.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (K6DGR)
203
Not on SCOTUS, but the judge who said Trump can use the Aliens act was a woman.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
Lucky for y'all we need those sammiches.
I'm an individuallist. I'd rather just say that I'm disappointed that none of these struggles with Trump have anything to do with actual law. Roberts won't overrule a patently illegal TRO set up in the dark of night because 'we should go thru the process'. Why isn't he mad the judge is making his 'norms' into a farce and him into a clown?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
Lucky for y'all we need those sammiches.
I'm an individuallist. I'd rather just say that I'm disappointed that none of these struggles with Trump have anything to do with actual law. Roberts won't overrule a patently illegal TRO set up in the dark of night because 'we should go thru the process'. Why isn't he mad the judge is making his 'norms' into a farce and him into a clown?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (8avO+)
204
Chicks on the bench, amirite?
Posted by: Josephistan at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (sl8Ar)
Ssssssssshhhhould be in da kitchen, makin' me a sammich.
Yeah....
What's that? Am I single? Well, yeah. Why do you ask?
Posted by: Josephistan at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM (sl8Ar)
Ssssssssshhhhould be in da kitchen, makin' me a sammich.
Yeah....
What's that? Am I single? Well, yeah. Why do you ask?
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (dGCAG)
205
Why not bonobos ?
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (/lPRQ)
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Why not bonobos ?
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (/lPRQ)
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (VE6XX)
206
Of course, and we should be able to form cooperatives.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (FZn/N)
I'm not much of a joiner. How about an uncooperative?
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (FZn/N)
I'm not much of a joiner. How about an uncooperative?
Posted by: As long as we get zee weapons at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (TbWk/)
207
Sharon (willows apprentice) is a dead-eyed shot. Don't piss her off.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (u82oZ)
208
>>Sounds like calling for and incitement to Presidential assassination; I think the Secret Service should give him a figurative and literal proctological exam.
The White House seems to be taking it seriously.
The White House seems to be taking it seriously.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (viF8m)
209
My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked, to say nothing of being murdered, in their home country than here in America.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked, to say nothing of being murdered, in their home country than here in America.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (l3YAf)
210
I would suggest.. menopause, but I would be shot, so I will not…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (PCK5/)
I have never seen a normal picture of her. Even as a teen.
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (PCK5/)
I have never seen a normal picture of her. Even as a teen.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (FZn/N)
211
189 Pillage Idiot, check your email please
Posted by: Ben Had at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM
Thanks. Will do!
Posted by: Ben Had at May 15, 2025 06:20 PM
Thanks. Will do!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (HlyYF)
212
Started quoting international law in her decisions toward the end.
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (Uc8km)
-----------------
"It's not like she opined on the superiority of the South African Constitution over our own."
-- Zombie Notorious RGB, summitting Everest as we type ...
Posted by: Mike Armstrong at May 15, 2025 06:08 PM (Uc8km)
-----------------
"It's not like she opined on the superiority of the South African Constitution over our own."
-- Zombie Notorious RGB, summitting Everest as we type ...
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (2F9za)
213
What's that? Am I single? Well, yeah. Why do you ask?
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (dGCAG)
Better off single than holding her purse in the mall while she tries on clothes and runs up your credit card bill.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (dGCAG)
Better off single than holding her purse in the mall while she tries on clothes and runs up your credit card bill.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:24 PM (8hq5W)
214
Disinterested FDA Director
Sounds like the import plan for the Left regarding trafficked children.
Sounds like the import plan for the Left regarding trafficked children.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:24 PM (u82oZ)
215
And I think that it is self evident - FUCKING SELF EVIDENT - that no such good faith exists in this equation. It is nothing more than economic parasitism. Nothing more.
I agree, and objectively its socially suicidal, even if it had justifiable legal precedent. But it is very important to the globalist agenda.
I agree, and objectively its socially suicidal, even if it had justifiable legal precedent. But it is very important to the globalist agenda.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (2VST1)
216
195
wrong with our "elites" having mental illness.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at
Salty! BIG hugs back, friend!
But that mental illness isn’t completely divided by gender, either. Bill Gates. Fauci. Obama (the actual male one), etc. I think the issue is liberalism makes you crazy. Or vice versa. Chicken / egg.
wrong with our "elites" having mental illness.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at
Salty! BIG hugs back, friend!
But that mental illness isn’t completely divided by gender, either. Bill Gates. Fauci. Obama (the actual male one), etc. I think the issue is liberalism makes you crazy. Or vice versa. Chicken / egg.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (QzINz)
217
Ever seen the yearbook photo of Maddow?? She looked… normal!
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (PCK5/)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (u82oZ)
219
LIDAR is proving to be a great tool in land survey. I am new to it (previous company was barely aware of it), but I really like it.
Posted by: Pug Mahon at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (0aYVJ)
———
LIDAR is completely upending known human history. Cities being found in the Amazon. The Carolina Bays being accurately measured. Areas around the pyramids reveal further hidden cities.
I saw one image of the Earth in LIDAR and impact craters were easily visible on the surface.
Posted by: Pug Mahon at May 15, 2025 06:12 PM (0aYVJ)
———
LIDAR is completely upending known human history. Cities being found in the Amazon. The Carolina Bays being accurately measured. Areas around the pyramids reveal further hidden cities.
I saw one image of the Earth in LIDAR and impact craters were easily visible on the surface.
Posted by: MAGA_Ken at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (qecxw)
220
Why the fuck are we even bothering with the charade that elections - or the will of the voter - even matters.
Seriously.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (K6DGR)
Of course they matter. The playing field would be entirely different if we had lost the election. You know this, turn the brain box on.
Seriously.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (K6DGR)
Of course they matter. The playing field would be entirely different if we had lost the election. You know this, turn the brain box on.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (8avO+)
221
What's that? Am I single? Well, yeah. Why do you ask?
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (dGCAG)
Better off single than holding her purse in the mall while she tries on clothes and runs up your credit card bill.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:24 PM (8hq5W)
Heyo! And then when she asks me to get a job, I say shut up, you old nag, you!
That'll learn her.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (dGCAG)
Better off single than holding her purse in the mall while she tries on clothes and runs up your credit card bill.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:24 PM (8hq5W)
Heyo! And then when she asks me to get a job, I say shut up, you old nag, you!
That'll learn her.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:26 PM (dGCAG)
222
Why not bonobos ?
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (/lPRQ)
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Posted by: It's me donna
II had to look it up.
The male version of a harpie is a ... harpie.
Looks the same, acts the same.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM (/lPRQ)
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Posted by: It's me donna
II had to look it up.
The male version of a harpie is a ... harpie.
Looks the same, acts the same.
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 06:26 PM (/lPRQ)
223
Who was the dude hiding behind the curtains and watching? Was that comey or another deep state freak?
Posted by: banana Dream at May 15, 2025 06:26 PM (cduTK)
224
if discreet circuit court decisions apply nationally why the hell is the Supreme Court even a thing?
and why can't we then have circuit representatives and senators and get rid of the federal legislature?
and why can't we then have circuit representatives and senators and get rid of the federal legislature?
Posted by: DanMan at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (8uzBS)
225
This is getting pretty wild.
>>@Sec_Noem
·
>>6m
Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of
@POTUS
Trump.
>>DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.
>>@Sec_Noem
·
>>6m
Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of
@POTUS
Trump.
>>DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (viF8m)
226
Piper
The Amish have a sound culture. And until recently, so did the Mormons.
Remember, the winners in the next generation are the children raised well today. Loving parents helps.
The Amish have a sound culture. And until recently, so did the Mormons.
Remember, the winners in the next generation are the children raised well today. Loving parents helps.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (u82oZ)
227
The Independent@Independent
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (L/fGl)
228
226 Piper
The Amish have a sound culture. And until recently, so did the Mormons.
Remember, the winners in the next generation are the children raised well today. Loving parents helps.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (u82oZ)
Two, preferably, yes?
The Amish have a sound culture. And until recently, so did the Mormons.
Remember, the winners in the next generation are the children raised well today. Loving parents helps.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (u82oZ)
Two, preferably, yes?
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (PCK5/)
229
The playing field would be entirely different if we had lost the election. You know this, turn the brain box on.
Yes, but... his complaint has merit. We vote for representatives to carry out policy they said they would while campaigning, and judges are just saying "nope" over and over as if our vote means nothing.
Yes, but... his complaint has merit. We vote for representatives to carry out policy they said they would while campaigning, and judges are just saying "nope" over and over as if our vote means nothing.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (2VST1)
230
The Independent@Independent
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (L/fGl)
What's 25% less than 70%?
That's your new pay, laydees.
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (L/fGl)
What's 25% less than 70%?
That's your new pay, laydees.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (dGCAG)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (u82oZ)
232
Yes, but... his complaint has merit. We vote for representatives to carry out policy they said they would while campaigning, and judges are just saying "nope" over and over as if our vote means nothing.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (2VST1)
Agreed
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (2VST1)
Agreed
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (VE6XX)
233
It's about time the feds hold these Internet Mullahs ("Influencers") accountable for issuing FATWAS to their online jihadis (followers).
It's about time the feds hold these Internet Mullahs ("Influencers") accountable for issuing FATWAS to their online jihadis (followers).
Posted by: Soothsayer's Innaccurate but Amusing Bigoted Facts at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (UqjAj)
234
149 The US courts, delenda est.
Power corrupts. Especially when you invent a power and give it to yourself, unchecked for a long time.
Power corrupts. Especially when you invent a power and give it to yourself, unchecked for a long time.
Posted by: Gref at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (aBgBM)
235
The HQ… we are voices, crying in the wilderness, a lot of the time..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (PCK5/)
236
Misgendered Harpies would be a good name for a band.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (vFG9F)
237
I don't like the "men rule women drool" arguments.
I have lived and worked with a lot of very level-headed women in my life: my wife, my Mom, both Grandmas, my dear departed sister, several women at the office.
But, Fenelon, my wife cannot make a decision on where to get dinner.
I have lived and worked with a lot of very level-headed women in my life: my wife, my Mom, both Grandmas, my dear departed sister, several women at the office.
But, Fenelon, my wife cannot make a decision on where to get dinner.
Posted by: Pug Mahon at May 15, 2025 06:29 PM (0aYVJ)
238
209 No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked, to say nothing of being murdered, in their home country than here in America.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025
The unfortunate reality is we need to be a nation of laws, and I did not put those children in this situation, their parents did. I also don’t believe for a second those children here are immune to being trafficked here in fact that is most likely the case and that is disgusting. I hope they come back through legal channels and make something of themselves.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025
The unfortunate reality is we need to be a nation of laws, and I did not put those children in this situation, their parents did. I also don’t believe for a second those children here are immune to being trafficked here in fact that is most likely the case and that is disgusting. I hope they come back through legal channels and make something of themselves.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (pRpzT)
239
Of course they matter. The playing field would be entirely different if we had lost the election. You know this, turn the brain box on.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (8avO+)
The box is on and what I see is the intentional hobbling - the Cloward-Pivening of our vote. While they run the clock out to 2026. At which point the impeachment circus starts again. What am I missing?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:25 PM (8avO+)
The box is on and what I see is the intentional hobbling - the Cloward-Pivening of our vote. While they run the clock out to 2026. At which point the impeachment circus starts again. What am I missing?
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (K6DGR)
240
LIDAR is completely upending known human history. Cities being found in the Amazon.
if discreet circuit court decisions apply nationally why the hell is the Supreme Court even a thing?
Right, that's one of the things that the Supreme Court needs to address: what is the scope and limitations of these court jurisdictions?
if discreet circuit court decisions apply nationally why the hell is the Supreme Court even a thing?
Right, that's one of the things that the Supreme Court needs to address: what is the scope and limitations of these court jurisdictions?
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (2VST1)
241
231 tubal
At least two.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (u82oZ)
Xx-xy is a nice touch too…
At least two.
Posted by: NaCly Dog at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (u82oZ)
Xx-xy is a nice touch too…
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (PCK5/)
242
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (VE6XX)
A dick
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (VE6XX)
A dick
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (VofaG)
243
I was trying to come up with something that was a male version of harpie and that's the best I could do...
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (VE6XX)
A male harpy would be called a harpy. A male eagle is still an eagle. If harpies come in both sexes "biologically" than both genders would have the same name.
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:22 PM (VE6XX)
A male harpy would be called a harpy. A male eagle is still an eagle. If harpies come in both sexes "biologically" than both genders would have the same name.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (8avO+)
244
RAW EGG NATIONALIST@Babygravy9
Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
-
Yeah, white people suck.
Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
-
Yeah, white people suck.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (L/fGl)
245
Comes knows by rights he should be in a Federal prison
Posted by: Skip at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (ypFCm)
Posted by: Field Marshal Zhukov at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (wBaIH)
247
">>DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately"
I hope they have much much more than this to hang on him.
I hope they have much much more than this to hang on him.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (vFG9F)
248
209 My understanding is that is unpossible because we are all a bunch of dim witted screeching harpies. 😉
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked, to say nothing of being murdered, in their home country than here in America.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (l3YAf)
At the risk of taking fire, I have one question. What about abortion?
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:17 PM (QzINz)
No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked, to say nothing of being murdered, in their home country than here in America.
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (l3YAf)
At the risk of taking fire, I have one question. What about abortion?
Posted by: Eromero at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (LHPAg)
249
228
Two, preferably, yes?
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (PCK5/)
That is ideal, for sure. I strongly believe we need to bring back public shaming for those who abandon their children.
Two, preferably, yes?
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:28 PM (PCK5/)
That is ideal, for sure. I strongly believe we need to bring back public shaming for those who abandon their children.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (pRpzT)
250
My Chinese fortune cookie says "The greatest generosity is non-attachment."
So there you are.
Posted by: Field Marshal Zhukov at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (wBaIH)
That's what my human traffickers told me.
So there you are.
Posted by: Field Marshal Zhukov at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM (wBaIH)
That's what my human traffickers told me.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (dGCAG)
251
The box is on and what I see is the intentional hobbling - the Cloward-Pivening of our vote. While they run the clock out to 2026. At which point the impeachment circus starts again. What am I missing?
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (K6DGR)
The fact that they are losing and the Dems have a popularity of about 20 percent? And their funding has been sliced by DOGE?
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (K6DGR)
The fact that they are losing and the Dems have a popularity of about 20 percent? And their funding has been sliced by DOGE?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (8avO+)
252
I hate when people whine nonstop about the same thing. How about you?
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (g47mK)
253
And by native environment you mean on the range, right?
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM
Range, horseback, or dance floor.
These particular unicorns have wide and varied interests.
Of course, their only known predator in the wild is Disco Doof, so they have to be a little careful on the dance floor!
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:21 PM
Range, horseback, or dance floor.
These particular unicorns have wide and varied interests.
Of course, their only known predator in the wild is Disco Doof, so they have to be a little careful on the dance floor!
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (HlyYF)
254
248
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (l3YAf)
At the risk of taking fire, I have one question. What about abortion?
Posted by: Eromero at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (LHPAg)
Third Rail Third Rail…!!
Is that something you think you can do?
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:23 PM (l3YAf)
At the risk of taking fire, I have one question. What about abortion?
Posted by: Eromero at May 15, 2025 06:32 PM (LHPAg)
Third Rail Third Rail…!!
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (PCK5/)
255
No, but judges have to be willing to send kids back to a country they’ve never known, knowing that they’ll be exposed to extreme poverty and are more likely to be sexually abused or trafficked....
They have no problem doing it routinely in custody cases.
They have no problem doing it routinely in custody cases.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (8hq5W)
256
Whatever the court rules Trump should deport every illegal and every child of an illegal.
And if the SC justices don't like Trump's handling of foreign policy and status as CinC of the military they are welcome to resign their court seats and run for president.
And if the SC justices don't like Trump's handling of foreign policy and status as CinC of the military they are welcome to resign their court seats and run for president.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (t0Rmr)
257
Bottom line is men and women are different . Almost opposite.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
258
After an ICE raid in my area a woman started a go fund me to bring her gardener "home". Well toots, Trump is working on sending him home.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (t0Rmr)
259
Ever seen the yearbook photo of Maddow?? She looked… normal!
Posted by: tubal
Then the murders started.
Posted by: tubal
Then the murders started.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (L/fGl)
260
252 I hate when people whine nonstop about the same thing. How about you?
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (g47mK)
We don’t just beat a horse to death at the HQ runner, we puree it..
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (g47mK)
We don’t just beat a horse to death at the HQ runner, we puree it..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (PCK5/)
261
" I hate when people whine nonstop about the same thing. How about you?"
All this whining. Ah can't take it!
All this whining. Ah can't take it!
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (vFG9F)
262
The unfortunate reality is we need to be a nation of laws, and I did not put those children in this situation, their parents did. I also don’t believe for a second those children here are immune to being trafficked here in fact that is most likely the case and that is disgusting. I hope they come back through legal channels and make something of themselves.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (pRpzT)
Fair enough. You’d probably be a good SCOTUS justice. Unfortunately, too many are soft and can’t make those kind of decisions. I think men and women are affected by compassion clouding out hard-nosed pragmatism, but I think it’s more common for women.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:30 PM (pRpzT)
Fair enough. You’d probably be a good SCOTUS justice. Unfortunately, too many are soft and can’t make those kind of decisions. I think men and women are affected by compassion clouding out hard-nosed pragmatism, but I think it’s more common for women.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (l3YAf)
263
Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
----------------------------
So Rick Stengel is volunteering to be jailed for Cain killing his brother Abel?
----------------------------
So Rick Stengel is volunteering to be jailed for Cain killing his brother Abel?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (8avO+)
264
Bottom line is men and women are different . Almost opposite.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Not in Thailand.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Not in Thailand.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (dGCAG)
265
I think men and women are affected by compassion clouding out hard-nosed pragmatism, but I think it’s more common for women.
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (l3YAf)
Not this woman
Posted by: Disinterested FDA Director at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (l3YAf)
Not this woman
Posted by: It's me donna at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (VE6XX)
266
>>I hope they have much much more than this to hang on him.
I do too. But they aren't mutually exclusive. If he has a parking ticket I want him hassled.
I'm often told here the process is the punishment so start punishing.
I do too. But they aren't mutually exclusive. If he has a parking ticket I want him hassled.
I'm often told here the process is the punishment so start punishing.
Posted by: JackStraw at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (viF8m)
267
We don’t just beat a horse to death at the HQ runner, we puree it..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (PCK5/)
My friend! I could not have said it better myself! Any commentary about the chicken ??
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (PCK5/)
My friend! I could not have said it better myself! Any commentary about the chicken ??
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (g47mK)
268
Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
I remember during the WoT, or during the conflict in Gaza, that any time civilians experienced a negative consequence the FNM would claim the US/Israel was engaged in "collective punishment" of the jihadis.
I guess that's ok though depending on which ethnic group is being punished?
I remember during the WoT, or during the conflict in Gaza, that any time civilians experienced a negative consequence the FNM would claim the US/Israel was engaged in "collective punishment" of the jihadis.
I guess that's ok though depending on which ethnic group is being punished?
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (t0Rmr)
269
Like I said below, the Left Bloc on the Court is going to issue an opinion on this that will make Judge Dredd's "I am the law!" look restrained.
It's basically going to argue that they are now the Supreme Law of the Land, above the Constitution and, of course, above the Executive and the Legislative.
It's going to be unhinged, deranged and spittle-flecked.
Roberts will join them but it'll be so out-of-bounds, the rest will be forced to side with the majority.
It's basically going to argue that they are now the Supreme Law of the Land, above the Constitution and, of course, above the Executive and the Legislative.
It's going to be unhinged, deranged and spittle-flecked.
Roberts will join them but it'll be so out-of-bounds, the rest will be forced to side with the majority.
Posted by: People's Hippo Voice at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (V/ccX)
270
The Independent@Independent
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (L/fGl)
This is so incredibly demeaning to women and whatever stupid bint came up with it deserves less pay.
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
-
Submitted without comment.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:27 PM (L/fGl)
This is so incredibly demeaning to women and whatever stupid bint came up with it deserves less pay.
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (pRpzT)
271
That said, the proper response of the Supreme Court about lesser federal courts should be "that's up to congress, they created the courts and the constitution leaves their definition and use up to congress."
However, that said, the supreme court CAN rule that the lesser federal courts cannot rule in ways that limit or control the three other branches. They cannot overrule actions by the Executive, Legislative, or Judicial branch. Now, that third one is assumed: you cannot overrule a higher court. But it should extend to ALL of the three coequal branches. ONLY the Supreme Court is given the constitutional authority to rule on the other two branches as part of their check and balance operation.
However, that said, the supreme court CAN rule that the lesser federal courts cannot rule in ways that limit or control the three other branches. They cannot overrule actions by the Executive, Legislative, or Judicial branch. Now, that third one is assumed: you cannot overrule a higher court. But it should extend to ALL of the three coequal branches. ONLY the Supreme Court is given the constitutional authority to rule on the other two branches as part of their check and balance operation.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (2VST1)
272
That's not true. Those judges are lawyers. Not people.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (dGCAG)
-----------------
Are you ready for "L.A. Law: Westworld?"
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:18 PM (dGCAG)
-----------------
Are you ready for "L.A. Law: Westworld?"
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:36 PM (wSKU6)
273
The fact that they are losing and the Dems have a popularity of about 20 percent? And their funding has been sliced by DOGE?
And magically, that 20% always translates to a 'by the skin of our teeth' win for us. On the rare occasion that we do. Funny how that works.
And magically, that 20% always translates to a 'by the skin of our teeth' win for us. On the rare occasion that we do. Funny how that works.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:36 PM (K6DGR)
274
"white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. "
It's as good as excuse as any. If they didn't have that they would come up with some other reason to get whitey.
It's as good as excuse as any. If they didn't have that they would come up with some other reason to get whitey.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:36 PM (vFG9F)
275
264 Bottom line is men and women are different . Almost opposite.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Not in Thailand.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (dGCAG)
You made me snort!
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Not in Thailand.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (dGCAG)
You made me snort!
Posted by: Piper at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (pRpzT)
276
Oh and about LIDAR, it is super cool. I mean it has great strategic use, but its also letting us basically look back in time into the ground and find things not immediately visible. Ground penetrating radar is pretty awesome as well.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (2VST1)
277
there is a nood something, you go now!
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (g47mK)
278
Joe Rogan interviewed Zahi Hawass.
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (A2D3h)
279
267 We don’t just beat a horse to death at the HQ runner, we puree it..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (PCK5/)
My friend! I could not have said it better myself! Any commentary about the chicken ??
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (g47mK)
The poor cloaca needs reconstruction… eggs just fall out now..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:34 PM (PCK5/)
My friend! I could not have said it better myself! Any commentary about the chicken ??
Posted by: runner at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (g47mK)
The poor cloaca needs reconstruction… eggs just fall out now..
Posted by: tubal at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (PCK5/)
280
The Independent@Independent
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
Feminists then: Any accusation that women can't take on important roles because they'd be incapacitated during their period is misogyny!
Feminists now: Making women work when they are on their period is misogyny!
Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period
Feminists then: Any accusation that women can't take on important roles because they'd be incapacitated during their period is misogyny!
Feminists now: Making women work when they are on their period is misogyny!
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (t0Rmr)
281
268 Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
Yeah, Rick Stengel wears a tiny hat, so that's par for the course.
Yeah, Rick Stengel wears a tiny hat, so that's par for the course.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (8hq5W)
282
"Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period"
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (vFG9F)
283
FDA, every day crackhead mothers are sentenced to jail, with the state or gramma now in charge of the kids.
Every day, dads are sentenced to jail with no one now watching them.
I have more sympathy for these American criminals than I do foreign criminals.
Sorry. Just getting more and more tribal as my world is being stripped away.
Every day, dads are sentenced to jail with no one now watching them.
I have more sympathy for these American criminals than I do foreign criminals.
Sorry. Just getting more and more tribal as my world is being stripped away.
Posted by: MkY at May 15, 2025 06:39 PM (cPGH3)
284
It finally cleared up outside
I can grill later
I can grill later
Posted by: Skip at May 15, 2025 06:40 PM (ypFCm)
285
ONLY the Supreme Court is given the constitutional authority to rule on the other two branches as part of their check and balance operation.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (2VST1)
----
Where is that in the Constitution?
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (2VST1)
----
Where is that in the Constitution?
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at May 15, 2025 06:40 PM (GlyvH)
286
After an ICE raid in my area a woman started a go fund me to bring her gardener "home". Well toots, Trump is working on sending him home.
The left thinks that Trump is personally arresting every illegal and sending them to death camps in El Salvador while masturbating furiously to pictures of Hitler.
The left thinks that Trump is personally arresting every illegal and sending them to death camps in El Salvador while masturbating furiously to pictures of Hitler.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:40 PM (2VST1)
287
So Rick Stengel is volunteering to be jailed for Cain killing his brother Abel?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (8avO+)
-------------
Imagine the demand for "reparations" resulting from that event?
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:35 PM (8avO+)
-------------
Imagine the demand for "reparations" resulting from that event?
Posted by: ShainS -- Doddergate is A Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy at May 15, 2025 06:40 PM (wSKU6)
288
Whatever the court rules Trump should deport every illegal and every child of an illegal.
And if the SC justices don't like Trump's handling of foreign policy and status as CinC of the military they are welcome to resign their court seats and run for president.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (t0Rmr)
A comical turn would be for Trump to take one of these Judges, sit him down and say "ok you want to be in charge of the government -- lets do it." You want to get someone pulled out of a prison in El Salvador.?
Then make him personally decide on each of the steps in the process and personally do it. No breaks. No help from assistant executives. You go to each step and do it yourself. What do you do when El Salvador says no? Go to war?? Then its 24-7 work orgainizing an invasion with you stuck in the entire process.
That might get some sense into the asshole. Then you fire him for neglecting his job as judge.
And if the SC justices don't like Trump's handling of foreign policy and status as CinC of the military they are welcome to resign their court seats and run for president.
Posted by: 18-1 at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (t0Rmr)
A comical turn would be for Trump to take one of these Judges, sit him down and say "ok you want to be in charge of the government -- lets do it." You want to get someone pulled out of a prison in El Salvador.?
Then make him personally decide on each of the steps in the process and personally do it. No breaks. No help from assistant executives. You go to each step and do it yourself. What do you do when El Salvador says no? Go to war?? Then its 24-7 work orgainizing an invasion with you stuck in the entire process.
That might get some sense into the asshole. Then you fire him for neglecting his job as judge.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:41 PM (8avO+)
289
Where is that in the Constitution?
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:42 PM (2VST1)
290
Yeah, Rick Stengel wears a tiny hat, so that's par for the course.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know
Oh do explain to us how the Jooos are to blame here. This should be rich.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know
Oh do explain to us how the Jooos are to blame here. This should be rich.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (2VST1)
291
Oh and about LIDAR, it is super cool. I mean it has great strategic use, but its also letting us basically look back in time into the ground and find things not immediately visible. Ground penetrating radar is pretty awesome as well.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (2VST1)
yeah it showing those big columns under the pyramid at Giza is totes cool.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM (2VST1)
yeah it showing those big columns under the pyramid at Giza is totes cool.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (8avO+)
292
...Sorry. Just getting more and more tribal as my world is being stripped away.
Posted by: MkY at May 15, 2025 06:39 PM (cPGH3)
Don't be sorry. Tribalization is exactly what this kind of shit leads to. And America, as founded, was the antithesis of that. The only 'tribe' America wants us to belong to is the American tribe. But the Left and its worship of multiculturalism and open borders is destroying that. Intentionally.
Posted by: MkY at May 15, 2025 06:39 PM (cPGH3)
Don't be sorry. Tribalization is exactly what this kind of shit leads to. And America, as founded, was the antithesis of that. The only 'tribe' America wants us to belong to is the American tribe. But the Left and its worship of multiculturalism and open borders is destroying that. Intentionally.
Posted by: Chairborne!...Desk From Above! at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (K6DGR)
293
Rick Stengel on MSNBC says white Afrikaners should be punished for the sins of their forebears. The notion of collective guilt is, ultimately, a theological notion that rests on nothing other than a determination to punish your enemies forever.
Yeah, white people suck.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM
Does Stengel believe in the old idea of punishing "Christ killers". Of course not.
Yeah, white people suck.
Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Now For a Limited Time Only! at May 15, 2025 06:31 PM
Does Stengel believe in the old idea of punishing "Christ killers". Of course not.
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (FZn/N)
294
276 Oh and about LIDAR, it is super cool. I mean it has great strategic use, but its also letting us basically look back in time into the ground and find things not immediately visible. Ground penetrating radar is pretty awesome as well.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM
I worked on a project in grad school where we could beat the results of the ground penetrating radar by using high-frequency seismic.
Our source was an M2 machine gun mounted facing downwards on the back of a pickup truck. You fired one in the ground to test the seismometer array. You put the next round into the back of the first round, and got a very nice high frequency ping.
The lead professor wrote up a proposal to improve the method using a 20mm cannon, since he knew there was a ton of old military surplus ammo.
The federal government (ATF?) said, "Nope, 50 cal BMG is the largest round you can fire!"
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:37 PM
I worked on a project in grad school where we could beat the results of the ground penetrating radar by using high-frequency seismic.
Our source was an M2 machine gun mounted facing downwards on the back of a pickup truck. You fired one in the ground to test the seismometer array. You put the next round into the back of the first round, and got a very nice high frequency ping.
The lead professor wrote up a proposal to improve the method using a 20mm cannon, since he knew there was a ton of old military surplus ammo.
The federal government (ATF?) said, "Nope, 50 cal BMG is the largest round you can fire!"
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (HlyYF)
295
257 Bottom line is men and women are different . Almost opposite.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Venus and Mars.
Posted by: polynikes at May 15, 2025 06:33 PM (VofaG)
Venus and Mars.
Posted by: Eromero at May 15, 2025 06:44 PM (LHPAg)
296
"Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period"
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (vFG9F)
I've MANifested a 4 week period for men. Its as valid as anything else these days.
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (vFG9F)
I've MANifested a 4 week period for men. Its as valid as anything else these days.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:44 PM (8avO+)
297
Where is that in the Constitution?
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:42 PM (2VST1)
---
That part makes sense. I was more questioning where "Supreme Court is given the constitutional authority to rule on the other two branches as part of their check and balance operation" can be found in the Constitution.
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:42 PM (2VST1)
---
That part makes sense. I was more questioning where "Supreme Court is given the constitutional authority to rule on the other two branches as part of their check and balance operation" can be found in the Constitution.
Posted by: "Perfessor" Squirrel at May 15, 2025 06:45 PM (GlyvH)
298
I worked on a project in grad school where we could beat the results of the ground penetrating radar by using high-frequency seismic.
Our source was an M2 machine gun mounted facing downwards on the back of a pickup truck. You fired one in the ground to test the seismometer array. You put the next round into the back of the first round, and got a very nice high frequency ping.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (HlyYF)
You get a big enough gun you can just look at the hole and get all the information.
Our source was an M2 machine gun mounted facing downwards on the back of a pickup truck. You fired one in the ground to test the seismometer array. You put the next round into the back of the first round, and got a very nice high frequency ping.
Posted by: Pillage Idiot at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (HlyYF)
You get a big enough gun you can just look at the hole and get all the information.
Posted by: Oldcat at May 15, 2025 06:46 PM (8avO+)
299
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor at May 15, 2025 06:43 PM (2VST1)
.......
Nice try. You aren't getting me banned that easily.
.......
Nice try. You aren't getting me banned that easily.
Posted by: Those Who Know, Know at May 15, 2025 06:47 PM (8hq5W)
300
I do get the feeling Barrett rules according to what the pope would do.
She votes to send abortion back to the states.
OK.
But then she ends up siding with the left on so many other issues.
Like illegal migration, for instance.
She seems to have followed Francis on that issue.
Is she really more of a liberal Catholic that lets the church guide her on moral issues?
Whereas Alito is more of a strict interpretation kind of guy and his faith plays little to no part in his decisions.
She votes to send abortion back to the states.
OK.
But then she ends up siding with the left on so many other issues.
Like illegal migration, for instance.
She seems to have followed Francis on that issue.
Is she really more of a liberal Catholic that lets the church guide her on moral issues?
Whereas Alito is more of a strict interpretation kind of guy and his faith plays little to no part in his decisions.
Posted by: SpeakingOf at May 15, 2025 06:50 PM (6ydKt)
301
I understand the whole Hatfield and McCoy bullshit, but it's still bullshit, and bigger bullshit generations later. Even the Montagues and Capulets figured it out, eventually
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:52 PM (FZn/N)
302
Posted by: SpeakingOf at May 15, 2025 06:50 PM (6ydKt)'
She seems vacant, programmed. People of Praise, Barret's cult, is non-denominational, btw
She seems vacant, programmed. People of Praise, Barret's cult, is non-denominational, btw
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:55 PM (FZn/N)
303
296 "Women shouldn’t have to work the week of their period. Period"
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (vFG9F)
They sure as hell aren't going to want to stay home with women on their periods.
Fine. Men don't have to work that week either.
Posted by: fd at May 15, 2025 06:38 PM (vFG9F)
They sure as hell aren't going to want to stay home with women on their periods.
Posted by: Work would be better at May 15, 2025 07:02 PM (TbWk/)
304
Hard Data? Is that whet the kids are calling it now?
Posted by: Captain Fantastic Damn It! at May 15, 2025 07:06 PM (ey6uh)
305
302 Posted by: SpeakingOf at May 15, 2025 06:50 PM (6ydKt)'
She seems vacant, programmed. People of Praise, Barret's cult, is non-denominational, btw
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:55 PM (FZn/N)
They commit to 5% annual tithe. What are they doing with the other 5% of GOD's money? Hmm?
She seems vacant, programmed. People of Praise, Barret's cult, is non-denominational, btw
Posted by: night lifted at May 15, 2025 06:55 PM (FZn/N)
They commit to 5% annual tithe. What are they doing with the other 5% of GOD's money? Hmm?
Posted by: Eromero at May 15, 2025 07:07 PM (LHPAg)
306
Where were all these district judges in WW2 when
Japanese American citizens were being thrown into
Concentration camps.
Japanese American citizens were being thrown into
Concentration camps.
Posted by: Deepred at May 15, 2025 07:22 PM (NRgOr)
307
Of course Sotomayor would dominate the arguments, because she's there representing all Hispanics, without a shred of care for the US and the constitution.
Posted by: Rbastid at May 15, 2025 07:54 PM (NLm3u)
308
"But many of them are also troubled by the executive order seeking to ban birthright citizenship and frustrated by the difficulty of reaching the merits."
They wouldn't be so frustrated if, over the last 230 years, congress or the judiciary had actually settled this issue.
This issue should have been settled ages ago. It should have been enshrined into law. Trump is now FORCING a decision that should have been made decades earlier. Clarify who can be born a citizen.
They wouldn't be so frustrated if, over the last 230 years, congress or the judiciary had actually settled this issue.
This issue should have been settled ages ago. It should have been enshrined into law. Trump is now FORCING a decision that should have been made decades earlier. Clarify who can be born a citizen.
Posted by: Jake Tapper - Prison Guard at May 15, 2025 08:11 PM (gDhA9)
309
Where is that in the Constitution?
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor
===========
Wait
Wut ?!
Congress can delegate authority they do not have?
Where it says that Congress creates the lesser federal courts and defines their scope. Where its assumed that the lesser federal courts are unable to overrule or check the Supreme Court's decisions.
Its built into the entire coequal branch system.
Posted by: Christopher R Taylor
===========
Wait
Wut ?!
Congress can delegate authority they do not have?
Posted by: Itinerant Alley Butcher at May 15, 2025 08:42 PM (/lPRQ)
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0273 seconds.
14 queries taking 0.0083 seconds, 317 records returned.
Page size 171 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.
MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement
Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band
AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection
AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings)
George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement
Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band
AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection
AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings)
George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer
Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica
New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network
Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes
Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse
Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party"
Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad
Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up
Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry
NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom
Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?"
Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind
All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd
Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran
Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore
Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery
Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile
Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance
Collective Names for Groups of People
John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets
Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle
Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy
Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive"
Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments
John Edwards Campaign Excuses
John Kerry Pick-Up Lines
Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney
Torments in Dog-Hell
Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat