Support




Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
CBD:
cbd.aoshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Powered by
Movable Type





Moving The Overton Window In The Other Direction: Mandating Firearms Ownership

It's a cute but ultimately dumb idea, mostly because mandating anything is anathema to a free society. The article is actually well reasoned (aside from a factual error), and while it will never happen it is worth thinking about.

Must Pack Heat: The Case for Mandating Gun Ownership

Obamacare is the perfect model for Republicans to follow to settle the gun issue once and for all. Using the same legal reasoning as the Affordable Care Act, pro-gun legislators can win this war by pushing for an individual gun ownership mandate. Such a mandate can be from the top-down, a Federal mandate. Or, like Romneycare, it can be instituted on the state level first—West Virginia, here’s looking at you. We’ve seen this happen recently with this very issue. At first, concealed carry laws were only allowed in certain states. Now, all fifty states allow for such licenses. A gun-ownership mandate could play out the same way.
See the error? Concealed carry is technically legal, but in reality impossible in New Jersey. And there are a few other states that make it extraordinarily difficult. This may seem to be a trivial quibble, but a lot of people in America live in places that have thoroughly demonized guns.

But just the conversation shifts the Overton Window just a bit, and I am all for that, especially in an era of rabid hoplophobia, and when the authoritarian Left is gleefully attacking our basic freedoms.

Posted by: CBD at 12:15 PM




Comments

(Jump to bottom of comments)

1 and the govt buys them For us.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:16 PM (r/xAU)

2 I would also like mine to be an pink iridescent pink.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:17 PM (r/xAU)

3 also self cleaning, and maybe I should have one to match every wardrobe choice.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (r/xAU)

4 fcol, do I have to hold this discussion all alone?

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (r/xAU)

5 A gun licensing mandate would work, with a single federal standard. Once you have the license, available in ten year increments, it may not be revoked without criminal charges against you. Real ones. Not going to jail, not losing your guns!

Posted by: trev006 at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (V7fbc)

6 Darn. Willow could have posted nood and then willow'd herself...

Posted by: trev006 at June 23, 2019 12:19 PM (V7fbc)

7 I enjoy the idea if not the actual fulfillment. I would love to hear the arguments against the idea. hysterical that 'for her protection' nor would' her body her choice' wouldn't be applied.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:20 PM (r/xAU)

8 "The aggressor sets the ROE"

which, in this case means mandate away, we didn't start this war.

Posted by: sock_rat_eez - they are gaslighting us 24/365 at June 23, 2019 12:20 PM (ITxGy)

9 I think your ideas are good, willow, one to match outfits in particular.

Posted by: sock_rat_eez - they are gaslighting us 24/365 at June 23, 2019 12:22 PM (ITxGy)

10 This....

https://tinyurl.com/y38c2ldu

Posted by: MarcusZ1967 at June 23, 2019 12:24 PM (yTkJ0)

11 I do not think this would work on a personal scale, nor would I want it to. But I do think anywhere there might be groups of children or people without protection against Russians or Methodists ; schools, concerts it would be nice to have mandated protection, 'for the children' of course.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:24 PM (r/xAU)

12 The downside, as with college, is that the price of ammo and firearms will skyrocket.

Subsidies always distort markets.

On the other hand (tm), the 'splodey heads of the Left being forced to buy a firearms may just be worth it.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 12:25 PM (DrqHq)

13 and 2Big2Fail/Jail banks MUST ISSUE credit to gun makers. Non-compliance from Chase means fines and arrests ... but currently we have banks conspiring with the left to restrict financing to gun makers.

Posted by: illiniwek at June 23, 2019 12:26 PM (Cus5s)

14 sock, I know right? I really think gun metal gray doesn't really check the mark with my fuschia handbag , or shoes.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:26 PM (r/xAU)

15 also self cleaning, and maybe I should have one to match every wardrobe choice.


Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (r/xAU)

Or maybe you could have some sort of product that allows you to change the gun's color like how you can change watch straps. Some sort of cover that doesn't impede the gun's functionality.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 12:26 PM (ZEsGh)

16 Vendette, what a lovely idea!

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:27 PM (r/xAU)

17 Vendette, what a lovely idea!


Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:27 PM (r/xAU)

At the very least, you could change the handle color.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 12:28 PM (ZEsGh)

18 Vendette, perhaps a gun wrap like they do with taxis in some cities.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:29 PM (r/xAU)

19 Early OT but firearm related. Tragedy in New Hampshire.

Seven members and supporters of the Marine Jarheads Motorcycle Club have been killed in a horrific crash in New Hampshire involving a pickup truck. According to The New York Post, most of the victims were former Marines.

-
There little information other than there were multiple head-on collisions and fires.

https://bit.ly/2N8AURl

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Tyrannosaur Wrangler at June 23, 2019 12:30 PM (+y/Ru)

20 Vendette, perhaps a gun wrap like they do with taxis in some cities.


Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:29 PM (r/xAU)

"The home invasion was thwarted when the homeowner pointed her fuchsia-colored shotgun at the intruder..."

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 12:32 PM (ZEsGh)

21 guns are dangerous ... SO, we MUST enact gun training for kids, starting in kindergarten ... time at the range in junior high. This is a necessary step toward raising responsible adults. No more sissies that are afraid of guns ... not even the women. If they can drive a 2000 pound vehicle at 65mph with oncoming traffic within two feet ... they can learn to handle a firearm to make our neighborhoods and malls safe again.


Roy Rogers and the Rifleman gave me some gun training around grade school time, but we can improve on that.

Posted by: illiniwek at June 23, 2019 12:32 PM (Cus5s)

22 I appreciate the concept of State's rights, but if I have a legally manufactured and purchased firearm in one state, how can I become a felon by driving across state lines? The RKBA, even if it is a second rate Constitutional right, means nothing. Those of us in the northeast risk a lot taking firearms to another part of the country (FL for example). While there is US law that supposedly protects the transportation of firearms, anybody willing to test that in MA? NY? NJ?

Posted by: Our Country is Screwed at June 23, 2019 12:34 PM (D3cJf)

23 It's a tax.

Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 12:35 PM (1g7ch)

24 19
Early OT but firearm related. Tragedy in New Hampshire.



Seven members and supporters of the Marine Jarheads Motorcycle Club
have been killed in a horrific crash in New Hampshire involving a pickup
truck. According to The New York Post, most of the victims were former
Marines.



-

There little information other than there were multiple head-on collisions and fires.



https://bit.ly/2N8AURl

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Tyrannosaur Wrangler at June 23, 2019 12:30 PM (+y/Ru)
This was about 2hrs north of Concord, NH. Prayers for those who were killed, for those injured, their families. Also keep the first responders and witnesses in your prayers - stories I'm hearing is it was a horrific scene.

Posted by: Our Country is Screwed at June 23, 2019 12:36 PM (D3cJf)

25 Any man willing to defend his country would own weapons in order to be prepared to do so. If he doesn't, then he's a free-rider, and it's not anathema to a free society to tax him to cover his share of the cost of defense.

Posted by: Colorado Alex In Exile at June 23, 2019 12:36 PM (SgjGX)

26 23 It's a tax.
Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 12:35 PM (1g7ch)

---------

It's a dessert topping.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 12:37 PM (gC2IV)

27 how can I become a felon by driving across state lines? The RKBA, even if it is a second rate Constitutional right, means nothing. Those of us in the northeast risk a lot taking firearms to another part of the country (FL for example). While there is US law that supposedly protects the transportation of firearms, anybody willing to test that in MA? NY? NJ?
Posted by: Our Country is Screwed/I]

Hence the 'incorporation' debate.

I fall on the incorporated side. Can a state abrogate the 1st Amendment? The 3rd?

Not really, right? So I don't see how a state can molest the 2nd further than the Federal government does.

Either the BoR means something vis a vis all citizens, or it's null and void.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 12:37 PM (DrqHq)

28 I always said that the instant leftists started spouting that The 2nd amendment was a
collective right, it was the responsibility of the government to immediately supply those arms to every citizen.

Posted by: Downcast at June 23, 2019 12:38 PM (p6Q7Q)

29 Don't the Swiss mandate gun ownership, or am I misremembering something?

Posted by: Ernst Schreiber at June 23, 2019 12:39 PM (xmKbk)

30 Home and the wife and I are going to order in Chinese food. I think for Jews in Nj this is also mandatory

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 23, 2019 12:41 PM (85Gof)

31 NJ has a 30 day waiting period for a handgun. And people who have literally been convicted of a host of crimes can not own a gun.

All conservatives should move out of NJ as soon as they are able. I had a friend at work who moved to NJ to work at a plant there. He left after a month and came back.

Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2019 12:42 PM (mpXpK)

32 Don't forget the county-level registration of qualified owners/carriers.
And of course the mandatory training sessions every month or so.
What?
You do not like the terms of the Militia Act of 1795?
Which the Founders considered perfectly Constitutional.
In a period of concern of attack. (Though of course then it was quasi-sovereign Indians and not totally foreign terrorists.)
Or is ONLY the mandatory ownership okay?
With, I guess, mandatory carry. (With exceptions for conscience "of course".)
Otherwise, got the full Militia Act, organize that unorganized militia again, and have that training and command structure going.
Of course that also means accepting the government mandating such service. And likely some corvee-style alternative for the objectors.
But as a bonus, going by said Militia Act of 1795, we also get constitutional carry of blades.
Oh, AND your arms are immune from all lawsuits and taxes and such for debt. Which is totally cool too.

Posted by: Sam at June 23, 2019 12:42 PM (YScgw)

33 I thought Kennesaw Georgia mandated gun ownership? This was over thirty years ago, how did that work out for them?

Posted by: Nancy at 7000 ft at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (0tmoY)

34 Didn't some city in the South mandate firearms ownership a few years back?

Posted by: These fish sticks are hard as tits at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (1L9V9)

35 I kinda thought that we already have a mandate in the 2nd Amendment.
Silly me.

Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (axyOa)

36 You bitter clingers are so uptight about guns. We're just taking them for your own good. Then the only people with guns will be selfless, morally superior public servants that will then shoot you if you're on the wrong side of history.--Spokesxir for the Demonicrat Party and the Principled Conservatives.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (m79Dg)

37 Jesus Marino RIVERA could still pitch. Lol

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (85Gof)

38 I don't think gun ownership should be mandatory, but I definitely think rights should be taken AWAY once you commit a crime vs our current system of having to beg our betters in government to practice a right clearly spelled out in the Constitution.

That ship has sailed, though.

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 12:44 PM (SYNdr)

39
Maybe we could establish a tax-funded charity. Maybe name it Planned Firearms.

Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at June 23, 2019 12:45 PM (Wx/+I)

40 Tell people it's how they do it in Sweden. The Leftists will have to sign on.

Yeah, I know it's Switzerland but they don't.

Posted by: blaster at June 23, 2019 12:47 PM (ZfRYq)

41 26 23 It's a tax.
Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 12:35 PM (1g7ch)

---------

It's a dessert topping.
Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 12:37 PM (gC2IV)
----
It's a tax and a dessert topping!

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 12:47 PM (MVjcR)

42 Posted by: Nancy at 7000 ft at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (0tmoY)
_________________________

Without looking it up I think it went good. They never enforced a penalty if you did not own one, I believe. I recall Ted Nugent talking about this not so long ago.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:47 PM (DB16e)

43 It is old timers day at Yankee Stadium

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 23, 2019 12:48 PM (85Gof)

44 If we're going to go by the Terms of the militia act, then no more restrictions on full-autos.

Posted by: Ernst Schreiber at June 23, 2019 12:48 PM (xmKbk)

45
Tax-free dessert toppings. Hell, tax-subsidized desert toppings!

Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at June 23, 2019 12:48 PM (Wx/+I)

46 Kennesaw Ga.

Posted by: navybrat swimming upstream at June 23, 2019 12:49 PM (CT1Wk)

47 Didn't some city in the South mandate firearms ownership a few years back?
Posted by: These fish sticks are hard as tits at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (1L9V9)

Kennesaw, Georgia didn't exactly mandate gun ownership. There were a lot of exemptions, even one for people that were conscientious objectors to owning guns.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 12:49 PM (m79Dg)

48 CCW is still bad law ..at least in California because they restrict the weapon you choose to carry to the one you qualified with.

See it's still about the gun...not your rights as a free citizen.

Equivalent of a driver's license for a Chevy or Ford. But I can see a reason to license Prius drivers special.

Posted by: torabora at June 23, 2019 12:49 PM (tV94Q)

49 Weapons are mandatory at WeaselAcres.

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 12:50 PM (MVjcR)

50 Repeal the NFA and have the CMP open a public rifle/pistol range in every county in the nation.

Put our tax dollars to good use for a change.

Posted by: Hairyback Guy at June 23, 2019 12:50 PM (Z+IKu)

51 It's a tax.
Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 12:35 PM (1g7ch)

---------

It's a dessert topping.
Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 12:37 PM (gC2IV)
----
It's a tax and a dessert topping!
Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 12:47 PM (MVjcR)

We've replaced the 2nd Amendment with laws that forbid people from owning guns. Let's see if they can tell the difference. We have hidden cameras recording their reactions.--Taster's Choice.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 12:51 PM (m79Dg)

52 35
I kinda thought that we already have a mandate in the 2nd Amendment.

Silly me.

Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2019 12:43 PM (axyOa)

---
As others have noted, the Constitution clearly contemplates this, and the statutory history is clear that this would be legal.

In terms of execution and compliance, it would be difficult, though. I guess you could tie it to voter registration or driver license renewal.

Back before Switzerland gave women the vote, the smaller cantons would hold their direct democracy events in the local stadium and for ID, the men would bring their gov't issued bayonet.

The debates were always very civil.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (cfSRQ)

53 I don't believe Hawaii has ever issued a CC to anyone.

Posted by: pat at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (5zZ1Q)

54 Instead of mandate maybe use radio ads suggesting every American should own a firearm and become proficient with it. Like the "Feed the Pig" and numerous other stupid, stupid, stupid gubmint funded awareness radio ads

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (DB16e)

55 49
Weapons are mandatory at WeaselAcres.

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 12:50 PM (MVjcR)

---
Hey, I sent you the article I talked about yesterday. Check the gmail account, particularly the spam folder.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 12:53 PM (cfSRQ)

56
"Feed the Pig"

Discover the forest

Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at June 23, 2019 12:54 PM (aKsyK)

57 may carry --> shall carry

Posted by: Warai-otoko at June 23, 2019 12:54 PM (AURKQ)

58
If we're going to have a PSA, how about: "The police have no duty to come to your rescue. What are you going to do to protect your home and family?"

Posted by: Hadrian the Seventh at June 23, 2019 12:54 PM (Wx/+I)

59 Posted by: Bertram Cabot, Jr. at June 23, 2019 12:54 PM (aKsyK)
__________________________

"I'm a banana slug, Steven. It took me a long time to get here."

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:54 PM (DB16e)

60 So who would be our Nancy Pelosi, walking up the capital steps with a gun and gavel?

Posted by: All Hail Eris, She-Wolf of the 'Ettes 'Ettes at June 23, 2019 12:55 PM (kQs4Y)

61 tie voting to gun proficiency:

use punch-card ballots, but you have to hit your chosen marks from thirty yards.

Posted by: Warai-otoko at June 23, 2019 12:56 PM (AURKQ)

62 I thought Kennesaw Georgia mandated gun ownership? This was over thirty years ago, how did that work out for them?

Yes, and a few other places too I think. But it was only meant to express disagreement with the antis. IIRC, it had a broad "conscience" opt out and I'm pretty sure no one has ever been prosecuted for noncompliance.

Posted by: Bob the Bilderberg at June 23, 2019 12:57 PM (qc+VF)

63 "When seconds count *door breaking open in the background* the police are minutes away. You are the front line when it comes to home and property security. "

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:58 PM (DB16e)

64 Kennesaw Ga.
Posted by: navybrat swimming upstream at June 23, 2019 12:49 PM (CT1Wk)

-------

I wrote a lengthy paper in college using Kennesaw and a few of other examples from the US.

I plainly stated in the thesis statement that mandatory gun ownership was unconstitutional and should not be supported.

But I used these places as control groups to illustrate violent crime rates in well-known, heavily armed areas as compared to the national average, and contrasting that against areas with strict gun control.

Kennesaw was particularly useful, as it has proximity to a relatively violent city (Atlanta).

I made the case to drastically loosen firearm restrictions, and to make firearms training part of education from 6th - 8th grades.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 12:58 PM (5aX2M)

65 With, I guess, mandatory carry. (With exceptions for conscience "of course".)
too.
Posted by: Sam


There's never been any proposal for mandatory carry. By anyone. Anywhere. At any time.

Otherwise, got the full Militia Act, organize that unorganized militia again, and have that training and command structure going.
Hanh?

Of course that also means accepting the government mandating such service.

Wrong again.

And likely some corvee-style alternative for the objectors.

Name one person forced to serve in the CA.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 12:59 PM (DrqHq)

66 I plainly stated in the thesis statement that mandatory gun ownership was unconstitutional and should not be supported.


Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 12:58 PM (5aX2M)

---
How so? Cannot Congress direct the militia (that is the whole of the people) to obtain arms in defense of the nation?


Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (cfSRQ)

67 I don't believe Hawaii has ever issued a CC to anyone.
Posted by: pat at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (5zZ1Q)

Hawaiian Judge was issued one because you paranoid gun owners might shoot him for voting his conscience. That way, he can return fire if necessary.--Personal Gofer for Hawaiian Judge.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (m79Dg)

68 Free college?....pffft!....Free ammo!

Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (ykq7q)

69 And can someone explain to me again why my gay marriage license is valid in Maryland but my concealed carry permit isn't?

Thanks again for those tax cuts that will expire, (R)s.

Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (Lwfjs)

70 How so? Cannot Congress direct the militia (that is the whole of the people) to obtain arms in defense of the nation?

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (cfSRQ)

Not the whole of the people. The whole of the citizenry. If you don't think the country is worth fighting for, you don't get to vote and you live here at the pleasure of those that do.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 01:03 PM (m79Dg)

71 It's a tax bitches!!!!

Posted by: Juan Robertos at June 23, 2019 01:03 PM (FiUMj)

72 Name one person forced to serve in the CA.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 12:59 PM (DrqHq)

---
If you mean the Continental Army, it's a moot point - the Constitution wasn't adopted until after the war was over.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:04 PM (cfSRQ)

73 tie voting to gun proficiency:

use punch-card ballots, but you have to hit your chosen marks from thirty yards.


This is awesome. Can I give Weasel my proxy?

Posted by: Bob the Bilderberg at June 23, 2019 01:04 PM (qc+VF)

74 And can someone explain to me again why my gay marriage license is valid in Maryland but my concealed carry permit isn't?

Reciprocity: How does it work?

Apparently, no one in Maryland knows.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy - #Progressivism=Socialism at June 23, 2019 01:05 PM (HaL55)

75 How so? Cannot Congress direct the militia (that is the whole of the people) to obtain arms in defense of the nation?

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:01 PM (cfSRQ)

-----

Same reason as Obamacare's individual mandate. That's not a tax, whatever John Roberts says.

Now, I suppose you could make the argument for pairing it with a budget neutral entitlement program, but that would be nearly as bad.

I'd just eliminate 95% of gun restrictions and let nature take its course.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:06 PM (5aX2M)

76 If you mean the Continental Army, it's a moot point - the Constitution wasn't adopted until after the war was over.
Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd -


So yer sayin' it'd be pretty stupid to suggest that the Founders had forced service in mind, right?

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:08 PM (DrqHq)

77 Instead of mandate maybe use radio ads suggesting every American should own a firearm and become proficient with it. Like the "Feed the Pig" and numerous other stupid, stupid, stupid gubmint funded awareness radio ads
Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (DB16e)

*****

I wonder if any radio station would carry it?

Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2019 01:09 PM (axyOa)

78 Instead of mandate maybe use radio ads suggesting
every American should own a firearm and become proficient with it. Like
the "Feed the Pig" and numerous other stupid, stupid, stupid gubmint
funded awareness radio ads

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (DB16e)



*****



I wonder if any radio station would carry it?

Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2019 01:09 PM (axyOa)


The Salem-owned stations would.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:10 PM (ZEsGh)

79 So yer sayin' it'd be pretty stupid to suggest that the Founders had forced service in mind, right?

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:08 PM (DrqHq)

---
No, merely that the example you asked for was besides the point.

The Founders very much had forced service in mind. Slavery was legal, after all.

The Militia Act of 1795 was pretty sweeping in its scope. The Founders distrusted standing military forces (particularly under the central government) to their solution was a massive force of militia.

That's why no amendments were needed for national conscription. It's part of Congress' power to regulate the militia, which consists of the whole body of the citizenry.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:11 PM (cfSRQ)

80 d forces service all the way up to until 1973. It was called the draft.

Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2019 01:12 PM (mpXpK)

81 We had.....

Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2019 01:12 PM (mpXpK)

82
See the error? Concealed carry is technically legal, but in reality impossible in New Jersey.







Untrue. NJ and all the other CCW-unfriendly states WILL issue licenses. As long as you make large political contributions to the right people, usually the County Sheriff's re-election fund. Or if you're clearly of the right sort of rich, non-minority person who can afford to get a pilot's license and join the County Sheriff's Air Auxiliary, as is common in several of the most left-wing counties in CA.

This has been the main result of CCW laws, massive corruption.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 23, 2019 01:13 PM (WJy0R)

83 Same reason as Obamacare's individual mandate. That's not a tax, whatever John Roberts says.



Now, I suppose you could make the argument for pairing it with a
budget neutral entitlement program, but that would be nearly as bad.



I'd just eliminate 95% of gun restrictions and let nature take its course.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:06 PM (5aX2M)

---
No, not at all.

Congress has explicit authority over the militia. It is well within historical tradition and legal precedent to mandate that all adult citizens capable of bearing arms have them.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:14 PM (cfSRQ)

84 Where can I get me one of them mandated guns?

Posted by: John Kerry in Ohio at June 23, 2019 01:15 PM (FiUMj)

85 The Founders very much had forced service in mind. Slavery was legal, after all.
Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd


Yes, invoking slavery is a great strategy for forced carry.

The Militia Act of 1795 was pretty sweeping in its scope. The Founders distrusted standing military forces (particularly under the central government) to their solution was a massive force of militia.

ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 13 called and asked if you had time for a swabbing.

That's why no amendments were needed for national conscription. It's part of Congress' power to regulate the militia, which consists of the whole body of the citizenry.


'Regulate the militia'

Jesus. Do we have to do this again?

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:16 PM (DrqHq)

86 Joisey don't even trust you to pump yer own gas.

Posted by: Mr. Peebles at June 23, 2019 01:17 PM (oVJmc)

87 Every gun comes with a smart chip.
Embedded in your carotid artery.

Posted by: xnycpeasant at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (SqopC)

88 The Salem-owned stations would.
Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:10 PM (ZEsGh)


****
Mt heys be fun to do. Better than Geico add.

Posted by: Diogenes at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (axyOa)

89 Kennesaw, GA made a law that all residents must own a firearm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennesaw,_Georgia

Posted by: Ironwood at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (n5L++)

90 It used to be that under 10USC311 et seq. that covered the militia that, as members of the unorganized militia, we were required to "own and be proficient" with a military-grade firearm. I remember reading that back in the early 90s but it seems to have been legislated off the books at some point between then and now.

Posted by: Mattski at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (FLyxJ)

91 Regulate in the 1700s didn't mean what it means today, ie control and set rules for. It meant more like administer. Hence, well regulated = well administered or well run.

Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (FiUMj)

92 The Salem-owned stations would.

--

What if they helped Trump, though?

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (SYNdr)

93 Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 12:53 PM (cfSRQ)
-------
Got it. Thanks. Haven't had a chance to read it yet.

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (MVjcR)

94 The Salem-owned stations would.
Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:10 PM (ZEsGh)

------

I'd venture to guess more than half of their listeners own one or more guns, and the rest already approve of it and are restricted by law from doing it.

The trick would be to get stations that moderate LIVs listen to, and I bet it would be VERY expensive to get Clear Channel to air any controversial rightwing ad.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (5aX2M)

95 86 Joisey don't even trust you to pump yer own gas.
Posted by: Mr. Peebles at June 23, 2019 01:17 PM (oVJmc)

___


Smart people in New Jersey!!

Posted by: Oregon at June 23, 2019 01:19 PM (FiUMj)

96
Instead of mandate maybe use radio ads suggesting every American should own a firearm and become proficient with it. Like the "Feed the Pig" and numerous other stupid, stupid, stupid gubmint funded awareness radio ads
Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 12:52 PM (DB16e)






Meh. I'm not a big fan of the M60. Yeah it's belt-fed, but it's not particularly reliable, the barrel design is stupid (asbestos glove? really?), prone to overheating, barrel droop and exploding in the gunner's face.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 23, 2019 01:19 PM (WJy0R)

97 "regulate the militia"

I don't have enough hands to adequately face-palm this.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:21 PM (DrqHq)

98 Joisey don't even trust you to pump yer own gas.
Posted by: Mr. Peebles at June 23, 2019 01:17 PM (oVJmc)
-------

Probably a good idea. Have you ever met anyone who lives in New Jersey?

Posted by: bluebell at June 23, 2019 01:21 PM (aXucN)

99 Since its chance of passing is about null why not try it and wake up a few people.

Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 01:21 PM (BbGew)

100 Regulate in the 1700s didn't mean what it means today, ie control and set rules for. It meant more like administer. Hence, well regulated = well administered or well run.

Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (FiUMj)

How are those different? I thought "regulated" meant trained/profecient?

Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 01:22 PM (ykq7q)

101 This has been the main result of CCW laws, massive corruption.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 23, 2019 01:13 PM (WJy0R)

Big differences between "May" issue and "Shall" issue jurisdictions. There are about 41 shall-issue states.

Posted by: ccw shall be issued at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (K1IUD)

102 Probably a good idea. Have you ever met anyone who lives in New Jersey?
Posted by: bluebell at June 23, 2019 01:21 PM (aXucN)

____

Hello?

Posted by: Sen Cory (D-NJ) at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (FiUMj)

103 'Regulate the militia'



Jesus. Do we have to do this again?

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:16 PM (DrqHq)

---
Do what again?

The same Constitutional power that can conscript you and send you to fight in the South Pacific or Vietnam can be used to require you to have a firearm for the defense of the state.

Also, drop the arrogance. We're all friends here.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (cfSRQ)

104 I think we get the Census ruling tomorrow.


Roberts to betray?

Posted by: Ha at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (MAstk)

105 100 Regulate in the 1700s didn't mean what it means today, ie control and set rules for. It meant more like administer. Hence, well regulated = well administered or well run.

Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (FiUMj)

How are those different? I thought "regulated" meant trained/profecient?
Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 01:22 PM (ykq7q)

___

The left reads the term regulate as in put up restrictions. Regulate what gun you can own, how many, who can own, etc, vs regulate, as in the govt just needs to make sure the militia is proficient/ready for action if needed.

Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:24 PM (FiUMj)

106 (looks around NC, SC, Georgia, and Florida)

Wait, do people still live in New Jersey?

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:25 PM (SYNdr)

107 A gun licensing mandate would work, with a single federal standard.
Posted by: trev006 at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (V7fbc)
---
NOPE.

i do NOT need a license to exercise a right.

that's why you have to get a driver's license, but not a speech one.

Posted by: redc1c4 at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (tKIE9)

108 104 I think we get the Census ruling tomorrow.


Roberts to betray?
Posted by: Ha at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (MAstk)

____

Yep. They always leave the "fuck you conservatives" rulings until the end. Obamacare, SSM as but a few examples.

Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (FiUMj)

109 Regulate in the 1700s didn't mean what it means today, ie control and set rules for. It meant more like administer. Hence, well regulated = well administered or well run.
Posted by: Lurking Lurker at June 23, 2019 01:18 PM (FiUMj)


Or meeting the highest standard.

Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (1g7ch)

110 that's why you have to get a driver's license, but not a speech one.
Posted by: redc1c4 at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (tKIE9)

___

We're working on that, give us a few years.

Posted by: Google, Facebook at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (FiUMj)

111 Can't do any harm, but not sure any windows will be moved.


And a sideshow to the real question of whether rule of law will be restored in general, which would clearly include things like incorporation of the 2A against the states, and even the putative judicial "system" will follow its own rules - such that the inferior courts can no longer simply defy SCOTUS on Heller and MacDonald.


It is beginning to seem that Roberts is even worse than he seemed, in that he has shown zero interest in this unprecedented unraveling of his very own authority and that of his institution [which he is always portrayed as carefully protecting, by some calculation - even though that in itself is not his job or sworn duty].

Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 01:27 PM (QDnY+)

112 The actual text:
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and
for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of
the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment
of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to
the discipline prescribed by Congress;
---
That's pretty sweeping authority.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:27 PM (cfSRQ)

113 Simpler, just bring back the Militia Acts.

You know, the ones that said every able bodied Man between certain ages were in the Militia, AND, that they were to supply their own arms and ammo? Of what were then, the primary MILITARY small arm of the day?

How can anyone say that is not Constitutional when the FOUNDERS were the ones who wrote those laws?

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:28 PM (NgKpN)

114
A gun licensing mandate would work, with a single federal standard.
Posted by: trev006 at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (V7fbc)
---
NOPE.

i do NOT need a license to exercise a right.

that's why you have to get a driver's license, but not a speech one.
Posted by: redc1c4 at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (tKIE9)






Yup, absolutely.

Also, keep in mind that a driver's license is not a license to drive. It's a license to use public roads. You can drive all you want on private roads or your own property and the gov't can't say boo about it. Just don't leave that private property for one moment.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (WJy0R)

115 As a bonus, it would cause a rapid improvement in the gene pool.

Posted by: Average Guy at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (LMcFk)

116
How can anyone say that is not Constitutional when the FOUNDERS were the ones who wrote those laws?

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:28 PM (NgKpN)

--

Those old white guys owned slaves. Duh.

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (SYNdr)

117 How can anyone say that is not Constitutional when the FOUNDERS were the ones who wrote those laws?
Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:28 PM (NgKpN)

____

Uhm the founders were racist and so everything they wrote is unconstitutional.

Posted by: AOC at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (FiUMj)

118 107 A gun licensing mandate would work, with a single federal standard.
Posted by: trev006 at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (V7fbc)
---
NOPE.

i do NOT need a license to exercise a right.

that's why you have to get a driver's license, but not a speech one.
Posted by: redc1c4 at June 23, 2019 01:26 PM (tKIE9)

Yup, how can it be a RIGHT, if you need prior GOVERNMENT permission to perform it?

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:30 PM (NgKpN)

119 It's a license to use public roads.

--

Hold our $17 water bottles.

- 15 bicyclists who believe their group is a single vehicle and who can't use any other roads but the busiest ones

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:31 PM (SYNdr)

120 Didn't the screwy Miller ruling, however one sided, find that the 2nd only protected arms with a military application?

Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 01:32 PM (1g7ch)

121 Mexican National Guard stopping border jumpers from entering U.S.A.?

Is Trump winning again?

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 01:32 PM (DB16e)

122 How can anyone say that is not Constitutional when the FOUNDERS were the ones who wrote those laws?

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:28 PM (NgKpN)

---
Yes. The government could also specify particular models and calibers on the basis of needing standardized ammo supply.

So it would be perfectly Constitutional to require every adult to possess a 9mm handgun and for them to present such weapon for inspection or face the same penalties as people refusing the draft.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:32 PM (cfSRQ)

123 Mexican National Guard stopping border jumpers from entering U.S.A.?

--

F*cking racists.

Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:32 PM (SYNdr)

124 When minors are suspected of being physically or sexually assaulted, in most areas there is what is called a Children's Advocacy Center that does the exam and interview for reporting to law enforcement. It is considered a way of getting the physical exam, psych exam and LE interview done in one shot so the kid isn't shunted around to various interviews.

A majority of them in Oregon do a household review and tend to leave notes on the recommendations that "houses with firearms should have the firearms secured for safety"

I always thought the recommendation should be "houses with firearms should have firearms training for minors by an accredited safety training group like (name the local one) as well as making sure firearms secured safely"

That would be a great move forward.

Posted by: Kindltot at June 23, 2019 01:33 PM (hSQmw)

125 Roberts to betray?
Posted by: Ha at June 23, 2019 01:23 PM (MAstk)

I say Yup. He is a douche bag.

A douche bag never changes it's spots.

Posted by: Hairyback Guy at June 23, 2019 01:34 PM (Z+IKu)

126 How can anyone say that is not Constitutional when the FOUNDERS were the ones who wrote those laws?
Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:28 PM (NgKpN)

____

Uhm the founders were racist and so everything they wrote is unconstitutional.
Posted by: AOC at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (FiUMj)


P.S.
Especially that Bill of Attainder thing.

- AOC


Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 01:34 PM (1g7ch)

127 *skims thread*
*scratches head*

Why can't people in New Jersey pump their own shotguns?

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 01:36 PM (t+qrx)

128 Everyone carries. Mutual Assured Destruction prevention theory.

Posted by: Can't resist temptation at June 23, 2019 01:36 PM (2DOZq)

129 What always gets me is the federal government can't take away your rights but the state government can.

Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 01:36 PM (BbGew)

130 Why can't people in New Jersey pump their own shotguns?

All the bling gets in the way...

Posted by: Additional Blond Agent, STEM guy at June 23, 2019 01:38 PM (7s3Gx)

131 "Horus Hearsay" - unlikely. Or only in a few locations. Have any specific data?


But since you raised the OT .... There's no "winning" in the ICE stand-down debacle. Whether it was wholly or partly a result of what seems like an audacious bit of insubordination by MacAleenan [too many confirmations of his perfidy for silence, he has to specifically refute, with Trump's backing, to retain credibility] - or if it is as claimed, a very poorly considered "trade" of one of the first, long-overdue and long promised resumptions of normal internal enforcement for the holy grail of asylum reform.


Context. In the applicable one, with the history and dynamics it has, this looks like a yuuuuge blunder.

Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 01:39 PM (QDnY+)

132 I am enjoying this new trend of mini-gun thread before the main Gub Thread.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:39 PM (yQpMk)

133 Yes. The government could also specify particular models and calibers on the basis of needing standardized ammo supply.

So it would be perfectly Constitutional to require every adult to possess a 9mm handgun and for them to present such weapon for inspection or face the same penalties as people refusing the draft.
Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:32 PM (cfSRQ)

The Primary Military small arm for the World today, it the Semi Auto 'Assault' Rifle.

The closest civilian equivalent is the AR-15.

That would be the standard required Arm if we follow the model of the Militia Acts.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:40 PM (NgKpN)

134 I say Yup. He is a douche bag.



A douche bag never changes it's spots.

Posted by: Hairyback Guy at June 23, 2019 01:34 PM (Z+IKu)

---
I'm not so sure.

This seems like a slam dunk. Citizenship was on the census before and it seems very odd to argue that the government can't know how many actual citizens it has.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:40 PM (cfSRQ)

135 and the govt buys them For us.


#1 wins the thread. A right that you can't afford is a right denied. We need our own federal funded Planned Pew-Pew

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:41 PM (yQpMk)

136 The Primary Military small arm for the World today, it the Semi Auto 'Assault' Rifle.

The closest civilian equivalent is the AR-15.

That would be the standard required Arm if we follow the model of the Militia Acts.



Each state could specify their own model, but they must have magazine compatibility.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:43 PM (yQpMk)

137 I am enjoying this new trend of mini-gun thread before the main Gub Thread.
Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:39 PM (yQpMk)


I didn't know there were enough Morons with miniguns to warrant a whole thread.

Clearly, I need to attend the TXMoMe.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 01:43 PM (t+qrx)

138 or if it is as claimed, a very poorly considered "trade" of one of the first, long-overdue and long promised resumptions of normal internal enforcement for the holy grail of asylum reform.


This. These are people that the courts have ordered deported. It seems like the lowest of low fruit and the kind of thing that should be happening routinely and daily.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:45 PM (yQpMk)

139
The closest civilian equivalent is the AR-15.



That would be the standard required Arm if we follow the model of the Militia Acts.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:40 PM (NgKpN)

---
Not necessarily. Mandating a pistol would be appropriate if Congress determines it to be preferable. Remember, purpose of the militia is to "execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions."

So requiring adults to have a 9mm for personal defense would fall under executing the laws.


Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:45 PM (cfSRQ)

140 Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 01:39 PM (QDnY+)
____________________

It's a piece over at Breitbart. It sounds like more help than we've received from Mexico in the past.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 01:45 PM (DB16e)

141
Clause 9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations

Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Clause 12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

Clause 13: To provide and maintain a Navy;

Clause 14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Clause 16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, byCession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And

Clause 18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (CFSlN)

142 It's a neat topic for discussion, but as a practical matter I think we're past the point where moving the overton window around is going to make much difference prior to the balloon going up - at which point I would prefer my opponents have as few arms as possible.

Posted by: lurker (the other one) at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (67XdO)

143 I'm not so sure.

This seems like a slam dunk. Citizenship was on the census before and it seems very odd to argue that the government can't know how many actual citizens it has.
Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:40 PM (cfSRQ)


Didn't the recent cross ruling state something to effect that it is ludicrous for what was once acceptable and unremarkable to suddenly be unconstitutional?

Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (1g7ch)

144
Clearly, I need to attend the TXMoMe.
Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 01:43 PM (t+qrx)
-------
Yes, yes you do. Have you applied for your MoMe license yet?

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (Vd1BJ)

145 I'm not so sure.
This seems like a slam dunk. Citizenship was on the census before and it seems very odd to argue that the government can't know how many actual citizens it has.
Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:40 PM (cfSRQ)

Good point, but it is Chief ClownCuck Roberts....not only will he deny the citizenship question, but he will mandate that all the illegal invaders have to buy Mugabe Care.

Honk. honk.



Posted by: Hairyback Guy at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (Z+IKu)

146 Two official gun threads in one day?
Died and gone to heaven.
Well, no. Just got back from the range giving Mrs. Garand's boy's invention a workout.
There's no mistaking a .30 caliber hole in paper or ringing a gong.

Posted by: RI Red at June 23, 2019 01:47 PM (R+3Am)

147 Apropos of nothing, do any of you Morons happen to have a Browning Hi-Power you want to part with? Particularly an Israeli marked Hi-Power. Or best of all, if only for the irony, a Waffen Marked Israeli overstamped Browning Hi-Power? The more worn the better too. I'm not looking for pristine.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:47 PM (yQpMk)

148 "See the error?"

The left doesn't care if their changes are Constitutional errors, logical errors, common sense errors, 57 gender type errors, etc. If we are going to make the left follow their own rules, we need to start acting as retarded as they do. That way, the schism will be unbridgeable, California will leave the Union, dogs and cats will live together, the whole 9 yards.

Posted by: Anonymous White Male at June 23, 2019 01:47 PM (m79Dg)

149 Oh, that attack in Ethopia yesterday?

@ArminRosen

The chief of staff of the Ethiopian army and the governor of the region that's historically been the country's seat of political power were both assassinated yesterday, icymi

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:48 PM (DrqHq)

150 The Militia Acts were, essentially, a draft. They were to be invoked in case of insurrection or invasion by the President, should Congress be in recess. It also provides for young white men to purchase guns and ammo within 6 months of being called, with the executive order ending after two years.

It recognized that many people in the 18-45 age range didn't and weren't required to have guns, and it was a temporary emergency measure.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:49 PM (5aX2M)

151 114 You can drive all you want on private roads or your
own property and the gov't can't say boo about it. Just don't leave that
private property for one moment.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at June 23, 2019 01:29 PM (WJy0R)

Thanks to the pressure from doctors in SC cops can come on private property to arrest underage drivers AND parents.

Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2019 01:49 PM (mpXpK)

152 Welp, this tidbit isn't directly related to the topic at hand, but since it deals with statist behavior, I figured I'd link to it. Instapundit and others have noted that Gamergate figure Anita Sarkeesian's "Feminist Frequency" non-profit got woke and broke. An Instapundit reader's response to that unfortunate state of affairs was the following graphic:

https://tinyurl.com/y2hto9nh

Enjoy and use as needed.

Posted by: Additional Blond Agent, STEM guy at June 23, 2019 01:50 PM (7s3Gx)

153 Justice Scalia said *bear arms* meant exactly that,
if you can carry it you can have it. ie You cannot bear a tank therefore you cannot possess a tank.

A shoulder fired missile is OK. If you can bear it.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:50 PM (CFSlN)

154
Anyone check out that yt channel I recommended with the very likable kraut?

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 01:50 PM (JAi0L)

155 146 Two official gun threads in one day?
Died and gone to heaven.
Well, no. Just got back from the range giving Mrs. Garand's boy's invention a workout.
There's no mistaking a .30 caliber hole in paper or ringing a gong.
Posted by: RI Red at June 23, 2019 01:47 PM (R+3Am)
-----
Sound of freedom!

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (MVjcR)

156 Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:47 PM (yQpMk)


I'll trade one for a case of gun show loopholes.

Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (ykq7q)

157 Justice Scalia said *bear arms* meant exactly that,
if you can carry it you can have it. ie You cannot bear a tank therefore you cannot possess a tank.

A shoulder fired missile is OK. If you can bear it.




Cannon were routinely privately owned in the founder's time. How does that square?

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (yQpMk)

158 All UR hobbies R Rs:

@ravelry

We are banning support of Donald Trump and his administration on Ravelry. We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:52 PM (DrqHq)

159 "It's part of congress' power to regulate the militia,"

If you're speaking about the "A well regulated militia" portion of the 2nd Amendment then I have to respectfully but strongly disagree.

Consider the language of the day.
Perhaps a statement like 'That's a well regulated young man.'

He's nothing to do with congress. Just that he's 'got it together.'

A well regulated militia is well equiped and well trained.
Part of the chains upon congress.
Not told to do by congress.

Posted by: now, name me an ex post facto gun law at June 23, 2019 01:52 PM (ubFZv)

160

What's ravelry?

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (JAi0L)

161 >>>Thanks to the pressure from doctors in SC cops can come on private property to arrest underage drivers AND parents.

Posted by: Vic at June 23, 2019 01:49 PM (mpXpK)
------------


They never stop.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (CFSlN)

162 Yes, yes you do. Have you applied for your MoMe license yet?
Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (Vd1BJ)


The way this thread is headed, I'm considering putting the application fee towards a Letter of Marque instead.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (t+qrx)

163 158: And of course, little Casey plagiarized the guidelines from RPG.net

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (U7k5w)

164
Wait, what?

They are banning support??

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (JAi0L)

165 What's up in Ethiopia? Is it religious, ethnic or just old fashioned power grab?

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (CFSlN)

166 What's ravelry?
Posted by: Soothsayer


Knitting hobby and commerce site.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:55 PM (DrqHq)

167 14 sock, I know right? I really think gun metal gray doesn't really check the mark with my fuschia handbag , or shoes.
Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:26 PM (r/xAU)
-------------

Yeah, but are you accessorizing for the gals or for the guys?

Posted by: blake - used sock salesman at June 23, 2019 01:55 PM (WEBkv)

168 160 A knitting a crochet site where you can support leftists as loudly as you like, no holds barred

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 01:55 PM (U7k5w)

169
So they are "banning" anyone who supports President Trump?

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 01:56 PM (JAi0L)

170 162 Yes, yes you do. Have you applied for your MoMe license yet?
Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (Vd1BJ)

The way this thread is headed, I'm considering putting the application fee towards a Letter of Marque instead.
Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (t+qrx)
-------
Aye!

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:56 PM (MVjcR)

171 We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy.

-------

Doesn't "include if of all include... " everything?" I'd think that would include white supremacists too.

And maybe even Trump voters.

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:57 PM (5aX2M)

172 169: If you support him on the site, white supremacist, you know. So fucking unsafe. Some of the stupid women said they cried with joy about the announcement. Ignorant whores.

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 01:57 PM (U7k5w)

173 Inclusive of all... stupid autocucumber

Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:58 PM (5aX2M)

174
Wait, do people still live in New Jersey?
Posted by: Moron Robbie
-------

Yes. Those who are trying to save up the money to pay the exit tax.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 01:58 PM (w54mS)

175 Didn't the recent cross ruling state something to
effect that it is ludicrous for what was once acceptable and
unremarkable to suddenly be unconstitutional?



Posted by: Burnt Toast at June 23, 2019 01:46 PM (1g7ch)

---
Yes, and there was also raised the question of standing.

What particularized injury will knowing the actual number of citizens cause?

The Dems have to argue that there may be *less* counting of people who have no legal right to be here in the first place.

Given the "actual enumeration" is spelled out, it's strange to find that the same document *bars* the government from knowing how many are citizens.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:58 PM (cfSRQ)

176 We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy.
------
Well it doesn't look like I'll be taking up knitting then.

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:58 PM (MVjcR)

177 Not necessarily. Mandating a pistol would be appropriate if Congress determines it to be preferable. Remember, purpose of the militia is to "execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions."

So requiring adults to have a 9mm for personal defense would fall under executing the laws.


Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 01:45 PM (cfSRQ)

You are not going to 'repel invasions' with a 9mm.

Note, the Militia acts did not even speak to side arms, which is what a pistol is considered.

It was Muskets, and Rifles.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (NgKpN)

178 Cannon were routinely privately owned in the founder's time. How does that square?

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (yQpMk)
-----------

I like your thinking but that wasn't covered in the interview.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (CFSlN)

179 Sound of freedom!
Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (MVjcR)

Damn straight!

And I shot straight, too.

Posted by: RI Red at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (R+3Am)

180 The Militia Acts were, essentially, a draft. They
were to be invoked in case of insurrection or invasion by the President,
should Congress be in recess. It also provides for young white men to
purchase guns and ammo within 6 months of being called, with the
executive order ending after two years.



It recognized that many people in the 18-45 age range didn't and
weren't required to have guns, and it was a temporary emergency measure.


Posted by: Yudhishthira's Dice at June 23, 2019 01:49 PM (5aX2M)

And back then Congress wasn't around most of the year.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (ZEsGh)

181 I, for one, am so glad that the scourge of white supremacism has been eradicated in the knitting world. I was really worried for a while.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 02:00 PM (gC2IV)

182 179 Sound of freedom!
Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (MVjcR)

Damn straight!

And I shot straight, too.
Posted by: RI Red at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (R+3Am)
--------
Nice! I had one of mine out last weekend too!

Posted by: Weasel at June 23, 2019 02:00 PM (MVjcR)

183 Horus, thanks. No need to remind anyone that the highest degree of skepticism is warranted when dealing with expectations of Mexico's willingness/ability to cooperate - it's a weird, semi-failed state in many respects.


For example the touted deployment of 6K troops to Guatemalan crossing points already seems to have produced the expected "workarounds" [changing location of crossing]. Dynamic response.


Overall, including the actual nature of the funding supplemental that is part of the purported enforcement/congressional action mix, things look very grim on border and migration [see Cong. Roy on the supplemental].


Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 02:01 PM (QDnY+)

184 157 Justice Scalia said *bear arms* meant exactly that,
if you can carry it you can have it. ie You cannot bear a tank therefore you cannot possess a tank.

A shoulder fired missile is OK. If you can bear it.



Cannon were routinely privately owned in the founder's time. How does that square?
Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 01:51 PM (yQpMk)

Yup, a lot of the Artillery in the early Civil War (on both sides) were Guns owned by Cities, States, or PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS, who donated them to the 'cause'.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:02 PM (NgKpN)

185 Wait, do people still live in New Jersey?

-
Other than Mafiosi?

Posted by: Anonosaurus Wrecks, Tyrannosaur Wrangler at June 23, 2019 02:03 PM (+y/Ru)

186 What the hevck? Most people should not carry firearms they are too stupid.

Posted by: guy with a pantload at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (UdKB7)

187 You are not going to 'repel invasions' with a 9mm.



Note, the Militia acts did not even speak to side arms, which is what a pistol is considered.



It was Muskets, and Rifles.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (NgKpN)

---
I don't follow you. I'm not arguing the Militia Acts are still in effect. My point is that Congress could pass a law requiring individual ownership of firearms and it would pass Constitutional muster.

The language clearly includes "to execute the laws of the Union," which Congress could declare the purpose of the "militia call-up."

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (cfSRQ)

188 Cannon were routinely privately owned in the founder's time. How does that square?
Posted by: Grump928(C)


Further, the Founders were ok with hiring people who owned ships with cannons. AKA Privateers.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (DrqHq)

189 >>>And back then Congress wasn't around most of the year.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (ZEsGh)
------------


They ought to try that again.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (CFSlN)

190 169
So they are "banning" anyone who supports President Trump?
Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 01:56 PM (JAi0L)

Sounds like an in Kind Campaign Contribution.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (NgKpN)

191 Not just criminal charges. Convictions.

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (I5SAg)

192 We cannot provide a space that is inclusive of all and also allow support for open white supremacy

-

That sums it up pretty well.

I think the KKK and Black Panthers are idiots, but I also acknowledge that they are American and have every right to say dumb stuff.

These folks don't believe in that. I don't mean on their site. I get that part. They mean ANYWHERE. That's the whole "white supremacist" nonsense. Make that stick and supporting Trump is a crime everywhere.

Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 02:05 PM (Lwfjs)

193 181
I, for one, am so glad that the scourge of white supremacism has been
eradicated in the knitting world. I was really worried for a while.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 02:00 PM (gC2IV)

---
I know I'll sleep better knowing that people wanting to knit MAGA caps will do it...without that one web site I never heard of before.

Posted by: Author A.H. Lloyd - now with functioning web site at June 23, 2019 02:05 PM (cfSRQ)

194
I think it's time we start going into leftist-owned firms and demand they make us Trump paraphernalia...or get sued.

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:06 PM (JAi0L)

195 The day President Trump is no longer in office and it's a Democrat the retribution will be coming for anyone who backed Trump.

Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 02:06 PM (BbGew)

196 Grump, I think Classic or AIM has LE turn-in Hi Powers right now. In CA I can't even imagine getting one [not on the roster/not C and R], but you in America might. Price wasn't low but that's the nature of that beast, I believe.

Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 02:06 PM (QDnY+)

197 I think the KKK and Black Panthers are idiots, but I
also acknowledge that they are American and have every right to say
dumb stuff.


Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 02:05 PM (Lwfjs)

---
But do they have the right to crochet it?

STAND UP AGAINST HATE KNITTING!!!

Posted by: Leftist knitter in pussy hat at June 23, 2019 02:07 PM (cfSRQ)

198 This is only a short summary, but worth reading over. The Regulators of North Carolina, circa 1771:

http://tinyurl.com/yxvas2c6

Excerpt: "The Regulators were a large group of North Carolina colonists who opposed the taxation and fee system imposed by colonial officials in the late 1760s."

We've been troublemakers here for some time.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:07 PM (KoKdw)

199 Challenge: give me one thing that Trump has done that is unequivocally white supremacist. No waffling or hedging like "enforcing immigration law is racist". Nothing out of context. An act or statement that could only have been motivated by outright racism, no qualifiers. Straight-up white supremacist, no more or less.

If you can, I'll humbly admit that I was wrong. If you can't, you're barred from employment and commerce, and I get to burn your home to the ground, your wretched family shrieking off into exile in the dead of night, the tawdry remnants of the rags on your backs your only allowed possessions.

Any takers?

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:08 PM (t+qrx)

200 STAND UP AGAINST HATE KNITTING!!!
Posted by: Leftist knitter in pussy hat
----------

I'm knot so sure about this...

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:08 PM (KoKdw)

201 Further, the Founders were ok with hiring people who owned ships with cannons. AKA Privateers.

Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (DrqHq)

---
Ah for the days when one could outfit a warship for fun and profit!

Posted by: A.H. Lloyd, privateer in waiting at June 23, 2019 02:09 PM (cfSRQ)

202 O/T

Went to a Lake up here in Calif Friday with the Lady friend, to do some Hiking and Kayaking.

Wore my MAGA Hat, and the ONLY comment I got all day, was POSITIVE.

Things are not as the media would have us believe, even here in Clownifornia.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:09 PM (NgKpN)

203 You can have my kitting needles and crochet hook when you pry them from my cold dead hands!

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 02:09 PM (gC2IV)

204 I am still waiting for someone to test the ban on "open carry". Cop stops you while walking down the street with your SW semi pistol in a holster. You, of course, allow yourself to be arrested. Then the lawsuit begins. Take it all the way to SCOTUS.

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:10 PM (I5SAg)

205 Excerpt: "The Regulators were a large group of North
Carolina colonists who opposed the taxation and fee system imposed by
colonial officials in the late 1760s."



We've been troublemakers here for some time.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:07 PM (KoKdw)

---
Your college basketball teams are doing the same thing to the NCAA.

Posted by: A.H. Lloyd, privateer in waiting at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (cfSRQ)

206 What the hevck? Most people should not carry firearms they are too stupid.

Posted by: guy with a pantload at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (UdKB7)

see: Darwin

Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (ykq7q)

207 I thought an anathema was a fancy library in Liverpool and in Boston??

Posted by: andycanuck at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (Dh1wo)

208 We've been troublemakers here for some time.
Un-reconstructed rebels/

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (I5SAg)

209 193 181
I, for one, am so glad that the scourge of white supremacism has been
eradicated in the knitting world. I was really worried for a while.

Posted by: Duke Lowell
---------

The purl world remains to be subdued, however.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:12 PM (KoKdw)

210

The right to keep and bear is inalienable and unconditional.

Abrogation or infringement is a result of irresponsible exercise of that right. The same applies to all rights enumerated.

The PRIVILEGE of not exercising any right is also unconditional. However, privilege may not trump a right.

Posted by: irongrampa at June 23, 2019 02:12 PM (KATBx)

211 Letters of Marque and Reprisal?
Bring back those days!

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:13 PM (I5SAg)

212 That's just great. Where am I supposed to get the knitting patterns for KKK themed pot holders now?

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 02:13 PM (gC2IV)

213 If you're not competent enough to own a firearm then you are fully restricted from truly dangerous things like voting.

Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 02:13 PM (Lwfjs)

214 206 What the hevck? Most people should not carry firearms they are too stupid.

Posted by: guy with a pantload at June 23, 2019 02:04 PM (UdKB7)

see: Darwin
Posted by: BignJames at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (ykq7q)

It still cracks me up that the most famous Gunfight in History, the OK Corral, was when the Earp's were trying to confiscate guns.

Kinda makes me question who I should be rooting for.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:13 PM (NgKpN)

215 I was thinking of joining rivalry.com so I can tell them to shove a needle where the sun do not shine

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 23, 2019 02:13 PM (85Gof)

216 hogmartin, your approach is sound, but I'd say you're stipulating too much in your challenge. The very term and concept "white supremacy" has no real world reality to which it applies - THAT is the first hurdle for the dim racists and race-baiters who use them have to clear. Which they can't. They're ranting about non-existent hobgobblins.

Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (QDnY+)

217 207
I thought an anathema was a fancy library in Liverpool and in Boston??


Posted by: andycanuck at June 23, 2019 02:11 PM (Dh1wo)

---
No, its that thing you get when you're constipated.

Posted by: A.H. Lloyd, privateer in waiting at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (cfSRQ)

218 The purl world remains to be subdued, however.
Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:12 PM (KoKdw)


Subdue the Perl world?

From my cold dead regexes.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (t+qrx)

219 "192These folks don't believe in that. I don't mean on
their site. I get that part. They mean ANYWHERE. That's the whole "white
supremacist" nonsense. Make that stick and supporting Trump is a crime
everywhere.

Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 02:05 PM (Lwfjs)"
..
The more they fuck with everyone else, the more those people decide that what *they* believe in is living some place without leftists in it... and then they get to thinking about how to be the change they want to see in the world, as someone once put it.

Posted by: lurker (the other one) at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (67XdO)

220 189 >>>And back then Congress wasn't around most of the year.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 01:59 PM (ZEsGh)

______________________________

With today's high tech there is no reason they can't work out of an office in their hometown.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (DB16e)

221 They're ranting about non-existent hobgobblins.
Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (QDnY+)

Are hogobblins white?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 23, 2019 02:15 PM (85Gof)

222 >>>Ah for the days when one could outfit a warship for fun and profit!

Posted by: A.H. Lloyd, privateer in waiting at June 23, 2019 02:09 PM (cfSRQ)
-----------------------------------


Hypothetically thinking: We've seen those vids of Somali pirates and how easy it is to overtake one of those big tankers.

A well trained and equipped crew, even with shooters on the ship, would have a good chance of subduing it.

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 02:15 PM (CFSlN)

223 With today's high tech there is no reason they can't work out of an office in their hometown.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (DB16e)

---
Less opportunity for graft.

Posted by: Congresscritter at June 23, 2019 02:16 PM (cfSRQ)

224
Are hogobblins white?
Posted by: Nevergiveup
--------

Yes. The other white meat.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:16 PM (2qPhT)

225 Things are not as the media would have us believe, even here in Clownifornia.
Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:09 PM (NgKpN)

If you're enjoying the outdoors, your odds are better for meeting people who are conservative leaning, or at least don't GAF one way or the other.

Posted by: Average Guy at June 23, 2019 02:16 PM (LMcFk)

226 I've had enough people on Ravelry ask when I'm leaving that I'm rethinking it. I think I'd like to be banned instead. But I am looking for the appropriate agencies to hound about this censorship. And I've contacted a libertarian vendor about it. I intend to let them know this will hurt their advertising revenue.

Posted by: Notsothoreau at June 23, 2019 02:16 PM (Lqy/e)

227 The very term and concept "white supremacy" has no real world reality to which it applies - THAT is the first hurdle for the dim racists and race-baiters who use them have to clear. Which they can't. They're ranting about non-existent hobgobblins.
Posted by: rhomboid at June 23, 2019 02:14 PM (QDnY+)


n.b. they had to thaw out "white supremacist" because "racist" ran out of juice. I'm idly curious what they'll choose once they've fucked the life out of THAT chicken.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:17 PM (t+qrx)

228 Less opportunity for graft.
Posted by: Congresscritter
------

Also, more available for tar and feathers by constituents.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:17 PM (2qPhT)

229 You are not going to 'repel invasions' with a 9mm.


pfft, pew-pew-pew-pew 10 x might get the job done.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 02:17 PM (r/xAU)

230 226: I'm not sure it will. Will conservative yarn buyers really boycott Malabrigo or Cascade because they advertise on Ravelry?

Anyway, I deleted my account. Are you the one for whom they said "Less flouncing, more leaving, ta"?

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 02:19 PM (U7k5w)

231 Vacation on the high seas
See the world for a few weeks in out armed up privateer
Bonuses for loot secured!
A lifetime of memories to be had so come aboard!

Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 02:20 PM (BbGew)

232 There are 272 Million cars registered in the US.
There are 37,00 deaths from Car wrecks per year.

There are 393 Million guns in the US.
There are 37,000 gun deaths per year in the US, with 22,000 of those being suicide.

Take out suicide, and you are about 3 times more likely to die from you car, then from your gun.

Clearly, we need to ban cars.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:21 PM (NgKpN)

233 n.b. they had to thaw out "white supremacist" because "racist" ran out of juice. I'm idly curious what they'll choose once they've fucked the life out of THAT chicken.


"nationalist"

Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 23, 2019 02:21 PM (Rarvo)

234 Clearly, we need to ban cars.


don't give them any ideas!!!

Posted by: BlackOrchid at June 23, 2019 02:22 PM (Rarvo)

235 Here's a brief screencap of the Bolshie knitting crap:
https://twitter.com/ThinGrayLine01/status/
1142817986417451008
... if there hasn't been a link yet.

Posted by: andycanuck at June 23, 2019 02:22 PM (Dh1wo)

236 Taking enemy ships. The age-old method for a poor boy to become wealthy. E.G. Horatio Hornblower, Frederick Wentworth ("Persuasion").

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:22 PM (I5SAg)

237
If the Left honestly defined 'white supremacy,' they'd say it's anything that does not comport with idea that white people are to blame for everything and must be punished.

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:23 PM (JAi0L)

238 Less opportunity for graft.
Posted by: Congresscritter at June 23, 2019 02:16 PM (cfSRQ)

_________________________

That would be horrible for Congress.
They'd even be held accountable by the hometown media to some extent. I would think that would mean a more informed voter roll. Yeah, couldn't have that.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 02:23 PM (DB16e)

239
Please don't go thinking that the left's use of 'white supremacy' has anything whatsoever to do with the phrase with which you're familiar.

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:24 PM (JAi0L)

240 All of us down at the Brattleboro (aka Obammaboro, Vt) Women's, Gay, Lesbian, and Trans-Gender Reproductive Health Clinic are proud two announce will will be supporting Joo Bidin for Presdent. If Joo wins it will be just like havering Presdent Obama again. We loved are Black Presdent, did you ???

Posted by: Mary Clogginstien from Obamaboro, VT and Prood of it !!! at June 23, 2019 02:24 PM (qM84C)

241 Take out suicide, and you are about 3 times more likely to die from you car, then from your gun.

Clearly, we need to ban cars.
Posted by: Don Q
-------

Have you looked at the fatalities as a consequence of botched medical treatment?

"A recent Johns Hopkins study claims more than 250,000 people in the U.S. die every year from medical errors. Other reports claim the numbers to be as high as 440,000."

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:25 PM (w54mS)

242 I don't know how Trump is a racist or white supremacist, anyway. These people are just rabid libs and would use any derigueur category to lander him and suppress/shame supporters. I hope "get woke, go broke" applies to these people.

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 02:26 PM (U7k5w)

243 Have you looked at the fatalities as a consequence of botched medical treatment?

"A recent Johns Hopkins study claims more than 250,000 people in the U.S. die every year from medical errors. Other reports claim the numbers to be as high as 440,000."
Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:25 PM (w54mS)

Ran those stats before, you are more than 20 times more likely to be killed by your Doctor, than by someone else's gun.

Posted by: Don Q at June 23, 2019 02:27 PM (NgKpN)

244
Keep in mind, ALL white people are BORN racist, according to the Left.

These words, such as "racist," mean NOTHING, today.
Do not give them any credibility.

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:27 PM (JAi0L)

245 Take out suicide, and you are about 3 times more likely to die from you car, then from your gun.

First your car runs you over, then your gun shoots you.

Posted by: Insomniac at June 23, 2019 02:27 PM (NWiLs)

246 What's up in Ethiopia? Is it religious, ethnic or just old fashioned power grab?
Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 01:54 PM (CFSlN)

Ummmmmm......Yes.

Posted by: Hairyback Guy at June 23, 2019 02:27 PM (Z+IKu)

247 And from way upthread, does our military really carry semi-auto rifles?

I can't imagine that whatever the current version of the M-16 is, it doesn't have full auto on the selector switch.

And no takers on the current law that includes an ex post facto portion?

Hint, it is one that a fair number around here are fully on board with.

Posted by: now, name me an ex post facto gun law at June 23, 2019 02:28 PM (ubFZv)

248 Yes, that would be me. I was off, posting the link to several conservative sites and Twitter. I am able to write real letters about it. Just considering where to put the effort. How many times have we been treated to Lefties claiming they will leave the country, if things don't go their way? They claim they aren't censoring conservatives. Maybe someone needs to show them when they do.

Posted by: Notsothoreau at June 23, 2019 02:28 PM (Lqy/e)

249 4 fcol, do I have to hold this discussion all alone?
Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (r/xAU)


Oh wow! Antimatter Universe Willow sighting!

Posted by: Iron Mike Golf at June 23, 2019 02:28 PM (di1hb)

250
Hammer House Of Horrors is on. I never heard of this old (70's) Brit tv series.

It's pretty good.

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (JAi0L)

251
That would be horrible for Congress.
They'd even be held accountable by the hometown media to some extent. I would think that would mean a more informed voter roll. Yeah, couldn't have that.

Posted by: Horus Hearsay at June 23, 2019 02:23 PM (DB16e)
--------------

I want their health insurance and pension.

Isn't it true that they only need be re-elected one time in order to receive a pension?

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (CFSlN)

252 Please don't go thinking that the left's use of 'white supremacy' has anything whatsoever to do with the phrase with which you're familiar.
Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:24 PM (JAi0L)


No, of course it hasn't. I shouldn't be thinking of ways to win rhetorically against people who failed remedial reality as a second language, because it's like playing cards with someone who says your hand is just a social construct.

*sigh*

Gonna need lots of torches, I guess.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (t+qrx)

253 also self cleaning, and maybe I should have one to match every wardrobe choice.
Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 12:18 PM (r/xAU)

Evening Attire: Bond Arms derringer on tasteful but saucy thigh holster
Weddings: Skorpion SMG, in chrome and mother of pearl grips (lots of people at weddings)
Business: Glock 43
Casual: ...Help me out here. CZ PO-1? Belt holster?
Beach: Micro-Uzi (fits in beach bag)
Shopping: CZ 75, in tote holster

Posted by: Mark Rothko at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (R7nPl)

254 When the term white supremacist runs out of steam, they'll revert to racist. Sort of like rotating crops.

Posted by: Duke Lowell at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (gC2IV)

255 Hammer House Of Horrors is on.

It bends the nails every. Single. Time.

Posted by: Insomniac at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (NWiLs)

256
So, essentially if your car, your doctor, and your gun all conspire against you -

it's curtains, baby!


Posted by: naturalfake at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (r1/AF)

257 Don't forget to count all the old people in hospice that are literally starved to death, even though feeding tubes and intraveneous feeding are possible.

Posted by: JAS at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (I5SAg)

258 Mary - Have you ever looked into getting a nice 9mm handgun for protection? There are many to choose from.

Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (BbGew)

259 Ran those stats before, you are more than 20 times more likely to be killed by your Doctor, than by someone else's gun.
Posted by: Don Q
--------

So the query by the doctor at examination time, rather than "Do you have any guns?" should be, "Do you have a doctor?" LOL, it sure as hell would make the point.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (w54mS)

260 In case it hasn't been posted: Five cities where gun ownership is mandatory. It is an AOL link.

https://tinyurl.com/ycer6x9

Posted by: NOT THAT GUY at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (iTfiy)

261 First your car runs you over, then your gun shoots you.
Posted by: Insomniac at June 23, 2019 02:27 PM (NWiLs)


Then your dog leaves you for your best friend.

Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (t+qrx)

262 Posted by: now, name me an ex post facto gun law at June 23, 2019 02:28 PM (ubFZv)

You get semi and three round burst on M16s and M4s.

Posted by: Vanya at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (R7nPl)

263 248: Casey-boy plagiarized RPGnet. He couldn't come up with his own dishonest diatribe.

Do I want to contribute to his income stream? No, not even advertiser links.

Posted by: CN at June 23, 2019 02:31 PM (U7k5w)

264 First your car runs you over, then your gun shoots you.

-------
First you get in your truck, and then your dog shoots you. See yesterday's pet thread.

Posted by: andycanuck at June 23, 2019 02:31 PM (Dh1wo)

265 First your car runs you over, then your gun shoots you.

Posted by: Insomniac
--------

But the real danger is after you've been taken to the hospital.

Posted by: Mike Hammer, etc., etc. at June 23, 2019 02:33 PM (Ou6XS)

266 Then your dog leaves you for your best friend.
Posted by: hogmartin at June 23, 2019 02:30 PM (t+qrx)

hasn't that happened to many of us? I say dogs are only loyal when You are the one that gives them the best treats!

Try being a kosher household and some pal brings along a treyf treat.

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 02:33 PM (r/xAU)

267


nood

nice work, willow!

Posted by: Soothsayer at June 23, 2019 02:34 PM (JAi0L)

268 Thanks Vanya.
Guess I'll stick with the model I carried in the early-mid 70's.

Posted by: now, name me an ex post facto gun law at June 23, 2019 02:34 PM (ubFZv)

269 ty sooth!

Posted by: willow at June 23, 2019 02:35 PM (r/xAU)

270 I want their health insurance and pension.



Isn't it true that they only need be re-elected one time in order to receive a pension?

Posted by: Billy Cole at June 23, 2019 02:29 PM (CFSlN)

No, it's 5 years of service, so a senator needs to get through 5/6 of a term and a congressman needs to be elected 3 times and get through half of the 3rd term.

Posted by: Vendette at June 23, 2019 02:36 PM (ZEsGh)

271 Get in the truck, huh? Just a quick trip to the vet, you said. Where are my balls, Kevin? Where. Are. My. Balls?

Posted by: Dog what shot his owner at June 23, 2019 02:36 PM (gC2IV)

272 Nood fractions

Posted by: G marks the spot at June 23, 2019 02:37 PM (j5RRD)

273 - 15 bicyclists who believe their group is a single vehicle and who can't use any other roads but the busiest ones
Posted by: Moron Robbie - New AIDS cases in '99 = 40K/yr. New HIV cases each year since? Take a guess at June 23, 2019 01:31 PM (SYNdr)

Slingshot. Quarter-ounce fishing sinker. Treble hook. Three yards of 100# test line.

Some assembly required.

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at June 23, 2019 02:38 PM (WG6O9)

274 There are 272 Million cars registered in the US.
There are 37,00 deaths from Car wrecks per year.

There are 393 Million guns in the US.
There are 37,000 gun deaths per year in the US, with 22,000 of those being suicide.

-

Now do new annual HIV cases and AIDS deaths.

Posted by: Moron Robbie, the Return of Moron Robbie, now in theaters at June 23, 2019 02:39 PM (Lwfjs)

275 The thing that aggravates me the most is that the gun control advocates have a process to make all the changes they want but they refuse to initiate it and instead uses lawfare in front of retarded judges.

Posted by: Can't resist temptation at June 23, 2019 02:41 PM (2DOZq)

276 The chief of staff of the Ethiopian army and the governor of the region that's historically been the country's seat of political power were both assassinated yesterday, icymi
Posted by: weft cut-loop at June 23, 2019 01:48 PM (DrqHq)

The perps: muzzies or commies?

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at June 23, 2019 02:41 PM (WG6O9)

277 247 And from way upthread, does our military really carry semi-auto rifles?

I can't imagine that whatever the current version of the M-16 is, it doesn't have full auto on the selector switch.

And no takers on the current law that includes an ex post facto portion?

Hint, it is one that a fair number around here are fully on board with.
Posted by: now, name me an ex post facto gun law at June 23, 2019 02:28 PM (ubFZv)


I believe the latest version of the M16 (M16A4) with Safe/Semi/3 Round Burst was the standard issue rifle for USMC until 2014. Now, infantry types have the M4 carbine (full auto) and non-infantry Marines have the M16A4.

Posted by: Iron Mike Golf at June 23, 2019 02:47 PM (di1hb)

278 Vacation on the high seas
See the world for a few weeks in out armed up privateer
Bonuses for loot secured!
A lifetime of memories to be had so come aboard!
Posted by: Skip at June 23, 2019 02:20 PM (BbGew)

Cries out for a link to this:

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=mQbh7UNCZdc

Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at June 23, 2019 02:52 PM (WG6O9)

279 Mandatory ownership - it's an interesting idea, but I could never get behind it since I know a few people, including a couple relatives, who should never under any circumstances be allowed to own - or even handle - a firearm. And that's not an exaggeration in any way - one I can think of, the only question would be who she managed to shoot first, herself or whoever she was pissed off at, at the moment.

Posted by: tom servo at June 23, 2019 02:55 PM (V2Yro)

280 Now do new annual HIV cases and AIDS deaths.


The gun is good, the penis evil.

Posted by: Zardoz at June 23, 2019 02:56 PM (yQpMk)

281 Forced gun ownership is not a great idea, but how about this: mandatory gun training in high schools. no one's allowed to graduate and until they've passed weapon training class where they learned to shoot and maintain a firearm. We can decertify and not provide federal funds for high schools that refuse(such a high school would not be meeting the standard of education- the same as if they were not teaching English or math). Let's make sure that every American gets the training they need to exercise their birthright of gun ownership.

Posted by: Ryan at June 23, 2019 03:57 PM (MbXyl)

282 Don Q: The (Second) Militia Act of 1792 (I got my years mixed up), actually does mention side-arms. Ordinary troops must have a bayonet, while officers must carry swords or hangers. Some of colonial/State militia laws required tomahawks, hatchets, or cutting swords.
So a law specifying side arms in addition to long arms would have precedent.

A.H. Lloyd: Given the standard of said Militia Act, I agree with Don Q that the AR-15 would wind up at the default, or at least the 5.56 mm as the required caliber.
However, if it did come to specifying sidearms, I'm sure the argument over caliber there would cause quite the internet-style war.
(Also, thank you for covering all the history elements that I left unexplained in such a concise and accurate manner.)

Posted by: Sam at June 23, 2019 04:26 PM (YScgw)

283 What about cannons mortars and mines ? Can we have those too please ?

Posted by: Kurt at June 23, 2019 04:48 PM (eHPhW)

284 What about cannons mortars and mines ? Can we have those too please ?


We did before when we were free men.

Back under the stairs, Dunce.

Posted by: Grump928(C) at June 23, 2019 06:10 PM (yQpMk)

285 No need to mandate. Another way is the legitimate way. Simply create an executive order, where by you declare a natural right as the purview and only the purview of the dirt people:
Everyone is a member of the honorable militia by dint of being an American citizen.

Simple.

imagine to insanity of those who have yet to learn to code.

Posted by: Phil Carson at June 23, 2019 06:15 PM (LLej1)

286 "Moving The Overton Window In The Other Direction: Mandating Firearms Ownership"

Oh yeah.
You do everything possible to slam the Overton window in the other direction.

It costs the human extinction movement huge resources and money to simply move it back to it's last place.
All the while you outflank em' from another direction.

Ol' Ace may have forgotten his brilliant tiny masterpiece 12 years ago, but I never did.

Preference Cascade Bitchez.

Posted by: Phil Carson at June 23, 2019 06:22 PM (LLej1)

287 It changes the convo though. Once someone mentions school killings, and gun murders in general, followed by "we should outlaw them ...", the mention of universal ownership, training and carry would make them suck in some air, followed by a lengthy silence. I like it! It's less unconstitutional than anything going against the 2nd!

Posted by: Catnip at June 23, 2019 07:14 PM (fXZu3)

(Jump to top of page)






Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0379 seconds.
14 queries taking 0.0136 seconds, 295 records returned.
Page size 160 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.



MuNuvians
MeeNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!

Real Clear Politics
Gallup
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat