June 27, 2005

PHP, Perl or Python, I don't really care. Even Java will be considered. Any ideas? I have a list of nice-to-haves, but it's kind of long. I'll post that later.
- Unlimited blogs, forums, wikis and portals feeding from a common pool of articles and comments. That is, a post can appear on a blog and a forum and a wiki, with its comments and other details intact.
- Sub-sites with their own domains - and their own layouts
- Group-based permissions
- Semantic markup
- RSS feeds
- Page, block and template based site construction
- In-line and out-of-line editing
- A few nice clean themes to start with
- Absolutely no PHP or SQL coding required of - or indeed available to - regular users
- Plugin / module architecture
- Web services API
- Runs on Linux
- Doesn't cost more than US$2000 (Free is good. Open source is better.)
- Fully integrated and self-contained. I don't need a choice of three different blog modules, each using a different commenting system.
- An application, not a service.
- No usage restrictions. None of this "you can't run a hosting service" stuff.
- Background processing for big tasks like spam removal.
- Scales to thousands of sites.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at 04:02 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Any A. Mouse at June 28, 2005 01:45 AM (kCb5q)
Posted by: TallDave at June 28, 2005 09:07 AM (H8Wgl)

Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 28, 2005 09:14 AM (+S1Ft)
- Plugin / module architecture
But also:
- Fully integrated and self-contained. I don't need a choice of three different blog modules, each using a different commenting system.
Most of the open-source CMS I know are very big on modularity, and none of them match all your criteria. You might want to try a commercial alternative, although it is slightly more than $2000.

Posted by: Jojo at June 28, 2005 01:01 PM (08+db)
And I'm paying for this out of my own pocketses (if I ever find anything suitable). So multi-million-dollar five-year-implementation type stuff need not apply.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 28, 2005 01:38 PM (RbYVY)
Most of the open-source CMS I know are very big on modularity, and none of them match all your criteria.
That's what I've found too. The packages available are all either (a) elegant but very limited in their functionality or (b) mazes of twisty little modules, none of which work quite right or integrate with any of the other modules.
Or (c) cost $70,000 for the basic package, and even more if you want actual features.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 28, 2005 01:42 PM (RbYVY)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 28, 2005 01:43 PM (RbYVY)
Posted by: horatio at June 28, 2005 02:54 PM (YEzAV)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 29, 2005 04:52 PM (RbYVY)
Posted by: Tig at June 29, 2005 11:38 PM (CWhYh)
Posted by: ya pidoras at July 25, 2006 07:11 PM (EA4kr)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0087 seconds.
16 queries taking 0.0043 seconds, 33 records returned.
Page size 13 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.