June 12, 2003
Because It Was There
Whoa.
If you have a broadband connection (or are very patient) and have Quicktime installed on your computer, go
here. Now.
This view of
Petra is also good, if not quite as breathtaking as Everest.
Then go to the site's
home page to read more.
(Found in a comment on
Little Green Footballs, though unfortuntely I've now lost the comment.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:11 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: gsdfg at August 13, 2003 11:56 AM (bAmIQ)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 13, 2003 12:41 PM (jtW2s)
3
Christian loubouitn shoes discount|christian louboutin shoes| Christian loubouitn sale| cheap christian louboutin | Discount Christian loubouitn sale| cheap christian louboutin shoes | Discount Christian loubouitn| Christian Louboutin| louboutin shoes| cheap louboutin|discount Louboutin sale|Christian loubouitn sale|Christian loubouitn on sale|Christian loubouitn for sale
Posted by: asdfe at June 15, 2011 10:41 AM (n5o26)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Poodle Hats
My colleagues at work returned from lunch today to taunt me with their copies of Poodle Hat. I have been somewhat paralysed the last couple of days and haven't had the opportunity to go out and purchase my own copy. Grrr! Oops, time for my meds.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:11 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
June 11, 2003
Nor Any Drop To Drink
This week's New Scientist also has an article on the latest in mega-engineering trends, the same trend that Mapchic wrote about recently on
Geographica: dirty great big dams. New Scientist refers to them as "megawater" projects. And the Three Gorges Dam that Mapchic spoke of is only the beginning. Try this for size:
The third, western, arm is the biggest and most complex. It will capture the headwaters of the Yangtze in a 300-metre-high dam [That's as tall as an 80-storey building. — Pixy] downstream from the melting glaciers of Tibet. Every year, it will lift a volume of water equivalent to a quaerter of the annual flow of the river Nile through a 100-kilometre tunnel into the upper reaches of the Yellow river.
The article gives some grim statistics on just why China feels forced to undertake such huge projects:
Five times in the last decade, the Yellow river has failed to reach the sea for part of the year because every drop of water has been diverted.
The aquifers [underground water] of northern China are being depleted by a staggering 30 cubic kilometres a year.
The water table beneath Beijing has fallen 59 metres in the past 40 years.
The north of China, the article tells us, has two thirds of the nation's farmland and only one fifth the water; in the south the figures are reversed. So there are sound reasons for these projects, but the history of similar works - the Aswan Dam beaing a prime example - raise doubts about their long-term prospects.
The article also refers to an (admittedly speculative) Australian plan to "drought-proof" the country by diverting northern rivers such as the Clarence (which is actually in the southern half of Australia) and the Ord, inland in the general direction of Adelaide. Now, I'll grant that Adelaide needs all the water it can get, but the problem with trying to drought-proof Australia is that
it's a frigging desert.
Ahem. Sorry. It's not a question of there being more water than needed in some places and a shortage in others, as in China; even in principle there's not enough water to go around. The recent drought affected pretty much the entire country; in Sydney, which is where it is because of the high local rainfall (and the harbour, of course), it didn't rain at all for months. If you want to drought-proof Australia, you have two choices: either fix the world in a permanent
La Niña cycle (perhaps by dropping enormous ice cubes in the Pacific) - which really doesn't do that much and will probably piss off every country in the world
except Australia - or increase the water supply in the interior of the continent, perhaps by building a mountain range stretching from Ayers Rock to Adelaide. This idea (which was actually floated about twenty years ago) would give
real meaning to the term mega-engineering.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:46 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
ROT F, L
This week's
New Scientist notes that the Alpha Five database package (I've heard of Meta 4, but not of Alpha Five)
uses the extension .sex for its files:
As a result, the template directory of this program included filenames such as: "Gift entry.sex, Invited guests.sex, Party budget.sex, Classes to instructors.sex, Classes to students.sex, Recipes.sex, People - Activities.sex, Employees.sex" and much more.
The Motorola 6809 microprocessor, as used in the Tandy Color Computer (my first computer!), had a sign extend instruction; the assembly language mnemonic for which was, reasonably enough, SEX. Sign extend extended a signed 8-bit number to a signed 16-bit number. Due to the way twos-complement arithmetic works, this involves filling the leading byte with either zeroes or ones depending on whether the number was positive or negative. Which is probably more than you wanted to know about the subject, so lets get on with story:
DEC's engineers nearly got a PDP-11 assembler that used the SEX mnemonic out the door at one time, but (for once) marketing wasn't asleep and forced a change. That wasn't the last time this happened, either. The author of "The Intel 8086 Primer", who was one of the original designers of the 8086, noted that there was originally a SEX instruction on that processor, too. He says that Intel management got cold feet and decreed that it be changed, and thus the instruction was renamed CBW and CWD (depending on what was being extended). Amusingly, the Intel 8048 (the microcontroller used in IBM PC keyboards) is also missing straight SEX but has logical-or and logical-and instructions ORL and ANL.
That's just one of about a squillion little bits of geek humour to be found in the
Jargon File, including the wonderful tales
Robin Hood and Friar Tuck and
The Story of Mel:
A recent article devoted to the macho side of programming
made the bald and unvarnished statement:
Real Programmers write in FORTRAN.
Maybe they do now,
in this decadent era of
Lite beer, hand calculators, and "user-friendly'' software
but back in the Good Old Days,
when the term "software'' sounded funny
and Real Computers were made out of drums and vacuum tubes,
Real Programmers wrote in machine code.
Not FORTRAN. Not RATFOR. Not, even, assembly language.
Machine Code.
Raw, unadorned, inscrutable hexadecimal numbers.
Directly.
If you are a geek, or love a geek, or just want to understand geeks better, you really need to read The Story of Mel. The jargon file describes it thus:
This is one of hackerdom's great heroic epics, free verse or no. In a few spare images it captures more about the esthetics and psychology of hacking than all the scholarly volumes on the subject put together.
And also notes that:
The original submission to the net was not in free verse, nor any approximation to it -- it was straight prose style, in non-justified paragraphs. In bouncing around the net it apparently got modified into the "free verse" form now popular. In other words, it got hacked on the net. That seems appropriate, somehow.
Go forth and read, while I scour the net for new irony.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:37 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hi! I remember seeing the original Story of Mel at a site called spamm.net (now defunct; the URL has been purchased by a porn cam, as I just shockingly found out) (btw, the site spamm.net hung on by the skin of its teeth, thanks to Hormel) which actually managed to give Mel a last name. As I recall, someone found a manual for one of those old computers, and the lead programmer was mentioned by name. . .it's an absolutely lovely tale. . .
Posted by: Loyal Citizen Victor at June 13, 2003 11:49 AM (FNHVL)
2
I haven't seen that site, but according to the Jargon File, Mel was Mel Kaye.
There's a manual for the LGP-30 at http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/lgp-30-man.html but it doesn't mention Mel.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 13, 2003 12:03 PM (kFP8F)
3
Thanks for the URL for the LGP-30 Manual. It brings back old memories. The first computer I ever programmed was an LGP-30 that was donated to my High School. I learned programming on it in 1967 and then went on to the "modern" stuff in 1968 - FORTRAN on the IBM 360 and Assmebler on PDP-8!
But I was never the genius that Mel was. The cleverest program written by my high school crowd (not by me) was a simple program to perform long division. We would give it two large prime numbers. After the first few digits, it would take so long computing the next digit we would sit there and place bets on the answer.
The following Web Site has some old LGP-30 advertisements and some old coding sheet actually signed by the now-famous Mel Kaye:
http://www.bemorehealthy.com/LGP-30Computer/The30.htm
Posted by: SnakeEye at August 26, 2003 06:43 PM (9Spgu)
4
Wow, a real LGP-30 user! Cool!
In 1967 I was too busy learning to walk :/ Oh well, at least I learned serious programming on a PDP/11 - which I think may have even had core memory. One of the PDP/11s did, anyway; the other was all solid state.
Kids these days, with their gigabytes and gigahertzes, wouldn't know a punch card from a 9-track tape...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 27, 2003 12:59 AM (jtW2s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 10, 2003
Rocking the Casbah
Reason Online has a fascinating article up titled
Look Who’s Rocking the Casbah:
Eroticism like this, which seems to emerge from the pages of a Victoria’s Secret catalog, isn’t usually very noteworthy. Indeed, the video’s assumption that there’s something "forbidden" about its subject matter that must be approached in an "artistic" fashion may seem outdated. But in this case it is exactly such elements that make the production compelling. The reason is the video’s cultural context: This is not an American or European or Japanese video; it is an Arab artifact. The woman is a singer named Elissa; her song, which has made her a leading celebrity in the Mideast, is entitled "Aychaylak" ("I Live for You"); and both her song and her video were among last year’s biggest music hits in the Arabic-speaking world.
Exactly what the broader implications of this trend are is beyond me, but it's bound to have an impact on the Arab world.
(via
Motley Cow, who comments
Peace on Earth through Arab pop sex kittens?)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:15 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Geographica
Blog of the Day is
Geographica, hosted by Mapchic:
Happy birthday to me
Happy birthday to me
I’m still unemployed
And I have no money.
Oops, that was five days ago. Sorry, Mapchic!
I have to admit that I am a bit sad that I did not get a chance to go to China and see the Yangtze before the gorges were flooded. I understand that it was a lovely region.
What I do know for certain is that this dam will render all previous physical maps of China obsolete.
The changes wrought by this dam go way beyond those of a simple new roadway – instead there will be a new physical map of China. A new lake (no name has been released) will be created it is expected to stretch for almost 400 miles upstream along the Yangtze. The flooded area will cover 2 cities, 11 counties and 116 towns.
Yes, and I wish they'd stop moving borders around and changing names and stuff like that! I just bought a new atlas and I'd like it to last at least a little while, thank you!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:56 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Useless Motherboard Features
The Useless Motherboard Feature of the Day Award goes to
Gigabyte for their GA-7NNXP, GA-8PENXP, and GA-8KNXP.
Why's that?, you ask. I'll tell you. The GA-7NNXP has four memory sockets. How many memory modules do you think you can use with it?
Wrong. Guess again. That's right, three.
Similarly, the GA-8KNXP has six memory sockets. How many can you use? Yes, that's right. Four.
The 8KNXP's problem is actually understandable: The chipset supports two channels, and each channel supports four banks of memory. A double sided module - and almost all modules are double-sided - has two banks. Which means you can only use two modules. Unless you happen to have single-sided modules lying around. There's no point in
buying single-sided modules, because they have half the capacity of the double-sided ones but cost rather more than half as much.
The 7NNXP also has two channels. One channel can apparently support four banks of memory, and the other... Well, the 7NNXP (and the five other boards in the same family) is the only Nforce motherboard I've seen with four memory sockets; all the others have three. It would seem that the second channel can only support two banks. If you plug three 512MB double-sided modules into a 7NNXP, you get the expected 1.5GB, but because the memory isn't balanced across the channels, it doesn't work in dual channel mode. If you add a fourth module, you
still have 1.5GB of memory - it disables one side on each of the third and fourth modules - and it
still doesn't work in dual-channel mode.
Gah. What's the point? Apart from the four people in the world who happen to already have DDR400 single-sided modules that they aren't using, who needs this? And why isn't there a big notice on Gigabyte's site saying "extra memory sockets will not work for most users"?
Grumble. I'm upset mostly because these looked like really nice boards. As it stands, there's nothing really to set them apart from boards from the other manufactures like AOpen, Asus, Abit, Albatron, Asrock... Except that Gigabyte starts with a 'G'.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:53 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
We're the Phone Company
I've always loved this Lily Tomlin sketch from Saturday Night Live, perhaps because I've worked in the industry for (mumble) years. Every so often I'll trot it out when the opportunity arises - or indeed for no reason at all.
Here at the Phone Company we handle eighty-four billion calls a year, serving everyone from presidents and kings to scum of the earth. We realize that every so often you can't get an operator, for no apparent reason your phone goes out of order, or perhaps you get charged for a call you didn't make. We don't care. Watch this -- just lost Peoria. You see, this phone system consists of a multibillion-dollar matrix of space-age technology that is so sophisticated, even we can't handle it. But that's your problem, isn't it? Next time you complain about your phone service, why don't you try using two Dixie cups with a string. We don't care. We don't have to. We're the Phone Company.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:53 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
LOL--that reminds me of the old James Coburn movie called The President's Analyst, where the phone company was the evil bad guy.
Posted by: Susie at June 10, 2003 02:32 PM (xA/Fr)
2
I do hope you do not work for Valor Telecom. Oh wait, if you had to mumble the years, I am sure you are not working for this upstart third-world phone company.
Posted by: Tiger at June 11, 2003 01:38 PM (yCANp)
3
I've never heard of Valor Telecom - and by the sound of things I should be thankful. I live in Australia, which might explain this.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 11, 2003 06:52 PM (2Fxh3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 09, 2003
Rob is Still in Japan
Blog of the Day is
Rob's Still in Japan:
As we got into the elevator to go to our hotel room, a Japanese family got in with us. The kindergarten-aged girl took one look at us, marched up to me and insistently held out her nametag. We weren't quite sure how to react.
I looked at her nametag, and blurted out the first thing that came to mind: Aa, Minako-chan, hajimemashite! The young girl's face broke out into a huge grin, and she danced back to her equally happy parents.
Make sure you check out his
photo album too.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:53 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
So, This is W.Bloggar?
Hey, it got my categories! Neat. Now let's see if it works...
It does indeed. Cool, very cool.
w.bloggar: recommended by Pixy Misa. On the basis of three whole minutes of experience.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:55 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Ow! Said the Blogger
Ow! Ow ow!
Last night my back was a bit stiff, which I put down to a long day at the computer fiddling with stylesheets. This morning when I woke up, it was
OW.
Whoever designed the human spine needs a darn good kicking, that's what I say. I also say,
OW.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
June 08, 2003
One Shoe Off...
Susie of
Practical Penumbra asks the question that's been on all our minds:
Ever tried to manage a movie theater on a Saturday night with only one concession register open and one of your employees stuck on the roof?
Nooo... No, I must say that I haven't.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:20 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Not something I recommend anyone TRY, either.....
Posted by: Susie at June 09, 2003 12:39 AM (xA/Fr)
2
I can't say that I have, but I did open a McDonalds drive-thru with no microphone and a locked window. Didn't get much accomplished.
Posted by: Christian at February 06, 2004 09:53 AM (xdHNZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How's It Look?
Ambient Irony should look rather like this:

(Click for larger image.)
If it doesn't look like that, please leave a comment to let me know. Make sure you say what browser and operating system you are using.
Thanks!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:26 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Using IE Pixy, on Win 95, and the text in the center is covering the two sides a bit. On the left, it's over everything after the "S" in Sat and on the right, your first link begins und, followed by air, eat, lueless....
Plus I have to scroll back and forth to get the whole of the horizonal, in addition to scrolling down. All this zigging and zagging is making me dizzy!!!!
Posted by: Susie at June 09, 2003 12:37 AM (xA/Fr)
2
Foo! How annoying. I'll have to fiddle with it some more. Are you running at 1024x768? Hmm. Yes, I see, it fits under Mozilla or Opera but not IE. Grrr! (Smacks IE over the head.) If it's covering up the sidebars, it's probably because your fonts are too big.
I'll see what I can do. Or you could switch to Mozilla

Oh, and thanks for the input, Loyal Reader Susie!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 09, 2003 12:51 AM (v/Vqe)
3
See..a little tweeking and it's perfect! I can even see the cute kitties! (if I scroll horiziontally that is).
Hey--not my fault I have big fonts! I inherited them from my mom!
Posted by: Susie at June 09, 2003 11:06 AM (xA/Fr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Postman Pat Vs. The Internet
Over at
Gweilo Diaries, Conrad
points us to an article on the evils of spam, and a possible solution, running in The Weekly Standard. Conrad concludes:Something needs to be done and, in the end, the only solution may be an e-mail "postage fee".
This suggestion has been floated before, and has been largely ignored because, for a variety of reasons, it is completely impractical.
First off, the Internet is global. Unless every country in the world charges an email postage fee, any country that doesn't charge such a fee will become an instant spam-haven. So the spammers will relocate their servers at minimal cost, and spam will continue unabated.
Second, no-one runs the email system. Anyone can run an email server; I run three myself. Indeed, I've written an email server myself. How are you going to enforce this postage fee, when the way email actually works is one (privately owned) server passing the message to another, with no "post office" of any sort involved?
Third, even if you passed legislation that all SMTP (the Internet mail protocol) transactions on the public internet incur a fee, and enabled law-inforcement agencies to go after the free-email offenders, the immediate result would be that people stop using SMTP and start using something else. It's quite easy to send email over an SSL-encrypted HTTP connection so that it looks just like a web page. Tax that.
Fourth, there are many, many useful public mailing lists that send out thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of messages a day. An email tax would kill them instantly to no good end.
Finally, the technological solutions do work. I have 600 spam emails in my Junk folder, trapped there by Mozilla's Bayesian filtering. Christopher Caldwell's article shows a basic lack of understanding of how Bayesian filters work:The primary tool that exists today is the "Bayesian" filter, which seeks out words like "Viagra" and phrases like "online gambling." Spammers have long been able to evade such filters with subtle misspellings (TURN HER ON WITH HERBAL VIARGA!).
In fact, this is precisely the problem that existed before Bayesian filtering, and which Bayesian filtering is designed to solve.
The key here is that spam looks like spam. With Mozilla, there's a training period where you need to tell the program this is spam and this is not spam. It quickly learns to recognise the characteristics of spam; not just individual words, but all the patterns found in both the headers and the body of the message, the same things that let you tell at a glance that a message is spam.
Which is not to say that I don't favour anti-spam legislation. Even when it's filtered out automatically, I'm still paying to download the spam in the first place. The right legislation would let spammer's internet connections be blocked promptly, preventing the flood of messages going out in the first place... And leading us back to my first point. But at least we won't have some ghostly beaureacracy monitoring our emails and extracting a penny a piece.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
05:24 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
We've Got Movable Type!
It's up! I just made a tarball of my MT test site, scp'd it up to my server, unpacked it, fiddled with permissions and Apache options a bit, and viola!
If you're reading this in IE, though,
it's not my fault!
Update: Then I ran into errors in MT, ended up deleting the whole thing, installing 2.64, reimporting all my entries, re-adding my plugins, fiddling with my templates and stylesheets to get them working again... It could have gone smoother.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:09 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
It looks great (although I miss the pink kitties) except for the sidebars, scrolling thing, etc.--but since I have IE does that mean I can't use Moveable Type? Or if I do it will look funny to you?
And the comments didn't transfer! Will you be keeping both sites going for awhile? Or should I change my links?
By the way, Blogger is down again, which is why I am filling your new comments boxes with addled prose. If it stays down I may start on the addled poetry.....
Posted by: Susie at June 09, 2003 12:51 AM (xA/Fr)
2
I'm working on the IE problems. It's not inherent in Movable Type, it's just the particular layout I decided to use, which IE doesn't seem very happy with. (Of course, it works perfectly in every browser except the one that 90% of people use.)
I'll transfer the comments if you like - I just have to do it manually. MT can pick up all your posts from Blogger, but both my comment box and yours are separate thingies that MT knows nothing about.
I won't be updating the old site any more, so please do change your links. I'll have to get this IE problem fixed pronto. (Smacks IE over the head.) I'm running at 1024x768 right now, so I can see the problem (at least, I get the horizontal scroll bar), but making the appropriate changes to the stylesheet doesn't help

Feel free to comment to your hearts content while I wrestle with the forces of darkness

Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 09, 2003 01:06 AM (MB7Fq)
3
IE is not so much a web browser as an evil energy creature from another universe. It's the only possible explanation for the way it behaves. Augh!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 09, 2003 01:41 AM (w7Pkc)
4
I think I've beaten it! Hahahaha! I also now know how to stabilise the layout under Mozilla with extreme font sizes. Yay me! (Dies.)
Posted by: PixyMisa at June 09, 2003 02:19 AM (/kcmY)
5
This looks wonderful! Congrats on your new home!
Posted by: kelley at June 09, 2003 06:41 AM (rxBBD)
6
Thanks Kelley! I was getting a bit cheesed off with Blogger and decided today was the day. Well, yesterday was the day. The layout happened sort of by accident - I was fiddling with MT's templates and screwed them up. Oops - but it looks kind of interesting. Then I had to make it work :/
Posted by: PixyMisa at June 09, 2003 10:56 AM (/kcmY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hooray for England
Steven den Beste points to an
"opinion piece" by Tom Utley in The Telegraph (the English one, not Sydney's Daily Terror):
"You know, Tom," this sage said to me, glancing up from his well thumbed copy of Heidegger's Sein und Zeit, "we really ought to make Prince William Governor-General of Australia."
There are a number of problems with this ill-conceived attempt at humour, not least of which is that it's not funny. The one I choose to point out, though, is that the Brits can't make anyone our Governor-General. We send the Queen a list, and she approves one of our choices. I believe that the last list we sent only had one name on it - not a particularly good choice, in my opinion; in any case, it's rather strongly hinted which of the names is to be approved.
Oh, and as for Tom's lady friend who failed to find love in the Land Down Under: There certainly are heterosexual males even in Sydney, but most of them are already hooked up with beautiful Australian women. If you can't find a man in England, dear, you're not going to do any better down here.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:41 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Theatre of the Absurd
Tonight in Pixy Misa's Theatre of the Absurd we have a very special double feature:
Big Trouble (Barry Sonnenfeld, 2002) and
Big Trouble in Little China (John Carpenter, 1986).
Big Trouble takes its story from the book of the same name by
Dave Barry. Tim Allen stars as Eliot Arnold, formerly a Pulitzer prize-winning humour columnist for the Miami Herald (I wonder where they got
that idea from), now divorced and trying to make a living in advertising. He also narrates the film, a necessary conceit given the complex and curious nature of the story. Oh, and there's also an opening narration by Puggy (Jason Lee), who lives in a tree and wins the love of Nina the maid (Sofia Vergara), the lucky bastard.
By the end of the film, Eliot has saved the world, remarried, and won the respect of his teenage son (in order of increasing difficulty). In between, things happen. These things involve guns, goats,
bufo marinus, and the worlds most valuable garbage disposal unit.
Basically, this film is a farce, a screwball comedy, with elements of action thrown in. And the one thing you
can't do with either a farce or an action flick is slow down. Never ever slow down, never give your audience a chance to stop laughing or let the adrenalin go cold. Unfortunately,
Big Trouble doesn't manage this; there are many fine scenes, some wonderful ones, even, but the pacing is inconsistent. Perhaps this is because they were trying to shove the whole book into an 85-minute movie (and it
is a faithful translation; I don't recall anything significant that was missing or changed from the novel). Perhaps its just hard to translate this sort of insanity onto the screen;
Striptease, the movie of Carl Hiaasen's marvellous book, certainly suffered when it was turned into cellulite. [
That's celluloid. — Ed. Says you. Have you seen the film?]
Which is not to say that
Big Trouble is a bad film. One reviewer on IMDB called it "the worst comedy of the year", apparently because he couldn't follow the story. What's so hard? There's this guy (Tim Allen), you see, and his son (Ben Foster) is trying to kill this girl (Zooey Deschanel) [
What sort of a name is "Zooey"? — Ed.], only not like
kill her, it's just this game they're playing,
Killer, which if I recall correctly was released by Steve Jackson Games, and there's this toad (Rick Lazzarini) which has taken over the dog's (Martha Stewart. No,
really, Martha Stewart.) food dish and these Russians and this annoying guy that makes Fishhook Beer and then the world gets saved.
Well, maybe it helps to read the book first. Or maybe not. I did read the book first, and the movie being the faithful adaptation that it is, I knew what was coming. This works fine with, say,
The Princess Bride, where it doesn't matter if you read the book or watch the film first, because then you can go right ahead and watch the film or read the book, and it
adds to the experience rather than taking away. So, I wasn't confused at all watching
Big Trouble, but I wasn't surprised either. Except for the goat; I laughed out loud at the goat.
Which is just my way of saying,
no, it's not a bad film, much less the worst comedy of the year. Didn't
The Animal come out in 2002? No, apparently 2001. Anyway,
Big Trouble is a fun film, enjoyable and amusing, a bit cheesy, perhaps, but well worth the hour-and-a-half. Pixy Misa gives it a 7.
Big Trouble in Little China most certainly does
not have the pacing problems of
Big Trouble. It starts off nice and easy, setting the scene, establishing the characters... And then it hits full throttle and never lets up. This is Hollywood's take on the
Wuxia film, and it's a good one. If you're not familiar with this school of film, or the stories and legends it draws upon, then you can't expect it to make much sense, and you'll just have to hang on and enjoy the ride. If you
are familiar with the genre, you should enjoy the Western reaction to the various mythic elements, which can be summed up as
What is this shit?
Our guide to this exploration of Chinese legend is Jack Burton (Kurt Russell), a truck driver with friends in San Francisco's Chinatown. When Wang Chi's (Dennis Dun) newly arrived fiancee Miao Yin (Suzee Pai) is abducted from the airport by Chinese thugs, Jack and Wang go to rescue her. Their encounters move swiftly from rival gangs to flying men in bamboo hats (Thunder, Rain and Lightning, played by Carter Wong, Peter Kwong and James Pax) and a two-thousand year old Chinese sorceror who shoots beams of light from his eyes and mouth (Lo Pan, played by James Hong).
It's comic book stuff, but it's
good comic book stuff. There are love interests for all our heroes (Kim Cattrall as Gracie Law, the aforementioned Miao Yin (Miao Miao), and Kate Burton as Margo the reporter), there are fights, monsters, dark sorcery, bright magic (Victor Wong as Egg Shen), temples, weddings, guns, knives, good men, bad men, ninja girls (can't go wrong with ninja girls)... It doesn't have a car chase, not really, but apart from that the movie is complete.
Will Jack win through despite the odds, defeat the evil sorceror and save the girl? Well,
duh, of course he will. It's not so important how it ends, because you know that going in; what's important is that it's done with style, with humour, with
panache. And indeed it is. Pixy Misa gives it an 8.
Meanwhile, Blogger is down again. I'm not stupid, not totally; I can learn from painful experience; I did the Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C, Post&Publish dance, and I didn't lose my article. It's still down, and I still can't post; what do you expect from Microsoft SQL Server? Pixy Misa gives Blogger a 4. Catch it on TV.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:03 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
June 07, 2003
I'm in Big Trouble
Nina, the maid in Big Trouble, is played by
Sofia Vergara. I think I'm in love.
And you know those security seals they put on DVDs? I
hate those things! Particularly when they put them on all three sides. Not naming any particular companies (Viz Video).
Oh, and in case anyone was still planning to invade Australia, we have
lots of cane toads. Lots and lots of cane toads
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:34 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
June 06, 2003
Ewww!!
Is that how this blog [
The old Blogger blog. — Ed.] looks in Internet Explorer? I must admit, I'd never tried it; I use Mozilla for everything these days. No wonder nobody was reading it.
Well, anyway,
that was easy enough to fix. Thank goodness it's just tables and not stylesheets.
And Internet Explorer really doesn't get the idea of "reload", does it? Cow of a browser. People
use this thing? By choice?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:00 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
<< Page 70 >>
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0387 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.027 seconds, 76 records returned.
Page size 83 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.