February 07, 2006
Instant Disk Space
The other problem I had was that the SUSE installation I'm using (available
here, more Linux installs
here) only had 4GB of disk. 400MB is allocated to swap, leaving 3.6GB for files. A full Linux installation these days uses up... more than 4GB.
A slight problem, and the main reason why I really really needed to have the networking working. But then I decided to try renaming the virtual machine, because it was called "KDE_3.5_on_SUSE_Linux_10", which is a bit of a mouthful. I renamed it to Amelix, because its Linux running on Amelia (the name of my notebook).
Only it didn't work, because it was looking for the old file name. So I took a look at the config file, and lo! It is text. And I could change the name of the file therein, it it did work.
And what's more, it defined the virtual disk as SCSI drive 0:0. So I wondered, what would happen if I cloned the virtual disk file, and edited the config to point SCSI drive 0:1 at the new virtual disk.
The answer: It works. So I can add as many 4GB disks as I want... Until I run out of real disk, anyway.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:17 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
What's even cooler, if you download QEMU for Windows, is that you can create empty virtual disks. Then you can create an additional SCSI disk in the VMX file. Now fdisk and format it. Now you have a brand new disk of whatever size you want it to be. Try it out, it's fun!
Posted by: Eric at February 07, 2006 04:24 PM (Tikk+)
2
Hey, it works!
Now I have a 20GB disk. But it's virtual IDE instead of virtual SCSI.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 07, 2006 06:00 PM (RbYVY)
3
So your notebook is named "Amelia". Is there a computer named "Lina" yet?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2006 04:13 AM (pqiW9)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2006 07:00 AM (75UPs)
5
No, no, no. The other one should have been Sylpheel. (And I wonder how many people are picking up on the reference.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2006 12:24 PM (pqiW9)
6
You know that Naga and Amelia are sisters, right?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2006 01:55 PM (RbYVY)
7
No, I wasn't aware of that. I haven't watched the movies, since I've been informed they're nothing like as good as the TV series's are. And I didn't actually like either of the two TV series I bought all that much, either. They were OK, I guess, but not what I would consider top drawer. Besides which, it's Amelia and Zelgadis who really make the series for me (to the extent that anything does), and they're not in the movies where Naga appears.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2006 02:16 PM (pqiW9)
8
And I had the impression that Naga more resembled Martina than Amelia in terms of temperment -- and I really hated Martina.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2006 02:20 PM (pqiW9)
9
No-one likes Martina.

The first movie is well worth watching. And it gives an insight into why Lina put up with Naga rather than just char-broiling her and going off on her own.
I don't think we are ever told directly that Naga and Amelia are sisters. But we are told that Amelia has a big sister who left home and who she hasn't seen in years. And we also find out that Naga's real name is Gracia Ul Naga Seyruun - meaning that she's a princess of the royal family of Seyruun, just like Amelia.
Hmm. Apparently it is all explained in the books.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2006 03:33 PM (RbYVY)
10
Pixy: "Hey, it works!
Now I have a 20GB disk. But it's virtual IDE instead of virtual SCSI.

"
Cool! Have fun with virtual disk stuff. I'm going to play around with QEMU on Windows, see if it works as well as VMware.
Posted by: Eric at February 08, 2006 04:13 PM (Tikk+)
11
Oh, and there are at least two occasions when Naga and Amelia appear in the same scene - but they don't see each other either time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2006 08:53 PM (AZRXO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Virtual Private Crap
Okay, a little explanation for the previous entry. Or details, anyway, since anyone who has ever tried to use Windows networking would agree with the general concept.
Thanks to
Eric's recommendation, I have installed
VMWare Player on my notebook. A couple of hours after installing this, I had a full version of
SUSE Linux with KDE 3.5 up and running. It's fast and it's free, and it gets me away from all the nasty little gribbles that have been plaguing me when it comes to doing development work on Windows.
Except for networking.
It's on my notebook, as I mentioned. At work, I plug the notebook into a spare port in the ethernet switch on my desk. At home, I have WiFi. In between, I have wireless internet. So I have three network connections which I use at different times.
I need two things: One, that the virtual machine can connect to Windows on the notebook itself, and two, when I do have a network connection, that the virtual machine can access it.
Here's the problem. When a network connection is disconnected on Windows, Windows can't ping itself on that network port.
This is stupid. It means that Linux running under VMWare can only talk to Windows
running on the same machine when I have the network cable plugged in.
VMWare supports a "host only" mode, where the guest operating system can only connect to the host machine (in my case, Linux talking to Windows), but as far as I can see, this suffers from the exact same problem.
It also supports virtual networks, which would satisfy part one, but you can only use them under VMWare Player if the person who set up the guest operating system configured them at the time. And for the copy of SUSE I'm using, they didn't.
So it almost,
almost does everything I want, except it doesn't.
Oh, and every time I switch from WiFi to ethernet, I have to spend half an hour fighting with it before it will talk to itself.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:07 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Or a half-brick inna sock. That works too.
Brings new meaning to socks proxy, yeah? Eh! Eh?!
:-\ eh.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at February 07, 2006 01:09 PM (EhwJT)
2
That's really bad Tommy! Hopefully stand up comedy is not how you make a living.
Pixy, the one thing I struggle with on VMware is the underlying Windows networking. More than once I've been doing something, gone to upload it to the web only to discover that my Windows WiFi connection has gone south on me. The VMware virtual adapter can't tell that has happened, so I end up with a zombie connection.
If I could, I would never run Windows, but I just don't have that option. This does make it somewhat better, though.
Posted by: Eric at February 07, 2006 02:44 PM (Tikk+)
3
And people wonder why i want to be an engineer.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at February 08, 2006 03:01 AM (EhwJT)
4
Christian Louboutin black patent Lady Sling 120 slingback Christian Louboutin Lady Glitter Slingback Gold Christian Louboutin Lady Glitter Slingback Nude Christian Louboutin New Declic python Christian Louboutin No Prive Slingback Metallic Fabric Christian Louboutin Patent Slingback Christian Louboutin red patent calf So Private 120 slingbacks Chrsitian Louboutin Sexy Sling Glittered Stiletto Chrsitian Louboutin Sexy Sling Glittered Stiletto Christian Louboutin Bana 140 patent Pump
Posted by: louboutin cheap at May 19, 2011 12:37 AM (nFk7J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Windows Networking
Sucks.
Back later. Now, where did I put that hammer?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:57 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
See, that's why i keep a brick beside my laptop wheni have to boot into windows. Just lets it know who's boss.
~grumblegrumbleitisgrumble~
:-D
Posted by: tommy at February 07, 2006 10:49 AM (EhwJT)
2
My Windows WiFi connection is sooooooooooooooooo stable. I love it so much. I wouldn't know what to do if you took away my Windows.
Okay, I'm done smoking crack, back to reality.
Posted by: Eric at February 07, 2006 02:31 PM (Tikk+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2006
9600!
I remember how great it was when 9600bps modems came out. You no longer had to w... a... i... t... for a screen to refresh. It was just blurrp. Done. Not quite instantaneous, but near enough. Compared to 2400 or worse, 1200, it was bliss.
Which is to say, I swapped modems, and I'm now running at 9600kbps. 9632kbps down, to be precise, and 1024kbps up. Yeah!
I seem to be running on the second oldest version of the firmware for this modem, so I'm going to upgrade it now. That should give me ADSL2+ support and other fun stuff. And if it doesn't work, I have Mister Poopy Modem to fall back on.
Update: 12283/1021. I sacrificed 3kbps of upload for 2651kbps of download. I think I can live with that.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:40 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
*staring in open-billed shock*
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2006 07:28 PM (zBXYv)
2
Yay! Just don't get a speeding ticket...

Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2006 12:36 AM (a0oF7)
3
pixy, would you pleasepleaseplease email me?
i don't have your addr.
Posted by: matoko kusanagi at January 24, 2006 03:27 PM (0v1hW)
4
Good lord, I need to move to Australia right NOW.
Posted by: Eric at February 07, 2006 02:49 PM (Tikk+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One, Two, Many, Lots
Susie tagged me!
Four Jobs I've Had in My Life
Computer programmer*
Four Movies I Could Watch Over and Over, and Have
Spirited Away
Millennium Actress
The Princess Bride
Ghostbusters
Four Places I Have Lived
Melbourne
Sydney
Um, other places in Sydney
Four TV Shows I Love to Watch
Kamichu!
Gakuen Alice
Galaxy Angel
Futurama
Four Places I Have Been on Vacation
Caloundra
Mt Gambier (possums!)
Whitsunday Islands
Scone
Four Websites I Visit Daily since I got internet access again
JREF Forum
Munuviana
Tim Blair
AnimeSuki
Four Favorite Foods
Heinz Baked Beans in Ham Sauce
Cadbury Roast Almond Chocolate
Special K
Sausage sandwiches
Four Places I Would Rather Be Right Now
Um. I'm in Sydney, Australia; it's summer; I have air conditioning and a 4.5Mbit internet connection. Oh, all right:
San Diego - similar climate, good internet access (and lower latency to munu), and Amazon doesn't charge three times as much for shipping as they do for the product
Four People I Am Tagging With This Meme
Nah.
* Okay, and system analyst, system administrator, network engineer, webmaster, technical support monkey, database administrator; but always just as a distraction from the real job, which is programming. No matter what they hired me for.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:39 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
pixy, could you mail me please?
i can't sign in.
>:-(
matoko.kusanagi-at-gmail.com
Posted by: matoko kusanagi at January 22, 2006 12:23 PM (0v1hW)
2
I'm surprised you didn't nominate Tokyo as a place to be.
That puts you closer to all that anime and manga. They also have fibre to the home.
Albeit its colder during winter.
I'm currently annoyed cause cable is acting up.
Posted by: Andrew at January 22, 2006 02:21 PM (0585Z)
3
Do I get stealth points for recognizing that the post title is from the way Detrius the troll counts in Guards! Guards! (except when he was locked in the pork futures freezer...)?
Posted by: Susie at January 22, 2006 03:05 PM (a0oF7)
4
Ooops! My bad! It was Men At Arms.....
Posted by: Susie at January 23, 2006 01:54 PM (a0oF7)
5
Dangit, Susie, i was gonna ask the same question.
and don't forget Constable Cuddy's heat exchanger helmet.
:-D
Posted by: tommy at January 26, 2006 02:29 AM (EhwJT)
6
"Susie tagged me!"
Did that hurt, or did she just put a collar and transmitter on you?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 26, 2006 11:32 AM (zBXYv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2006
Kashimashi
Boy meets girl.
Boy loses girl.
Boy gets killed in a collision with a mile-long alien spacecraft and rebuilt as a girl.
Girl meets girl...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:37 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
After having read the AnimeNFO page on the show, I have to admit, that sounds not awful at all.
While I'm here, have you seen Elfen Lied yet?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 22, 2006 02:15 PM (+FLIL)
2
No, I haven't seen Elfen Lied. The first episode of Kashimashi wasn't bad - though the part where he actually gets hit by the spaceship is kind of dumb.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 23, 2006 11:23 AM (RbYVY)
3
That's the part I thought would be the funniest! Darn.
Elfen Lied is one of the most fsck'd up things I've seen in a while. "It's all fun and games until someone loses their limbs."
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 23, 2006 01:54 PM (+FLIL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 18, 2006
Good Enough For Now
I have ADSL.
Not ADSL 2+.
Not ADSL 2.
This modem doesn't support ADSL 2+ as far as I know, despite the lying weasel "2+" sticker. I tried using it with ADSL 2, and I got a connection at 10.8 Mbps down and 864 kbps up. Sometimes for as long as five or six seconds. Then it dropped out. Many many times.
After a certain amount of fiddling, I forced the modem into standard ADSL mode, and it's now running at 4544 kbps down, 960 kbps up. That's a fair way short of 24 Mbps, but its a lot better than 1500 / 256 that I had before I moved, and a whole lot better than the 64k I've been surviving on since then.
The connection's been stable for half an hour with no packet loss, which is a good sign. I might poke at it a bit to see if it will give me a higher speed - or I might leave it alone for now. Yeah, I think that's a better idea.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:03 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Susie at January 18, 2006 10:52 PM (a0oF7)
2
What brand and model is your modem? It might simply be your physical distance that is preventing you from connecting at ADSL2+ speeds.
Posted by: Jojo at January 19, 2006 08:03 AM (OYwJ2)
3
It's a Netcomm NB5. It's not a very good modem, as far as I can tell; Netcomm keep shipping them to us by mistake, so I got one for free.
I don't live that far from the exchange, maybe 1km, but there's no guarantee. I have another modem around here, a Netgear, but it's in a box somewhere.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 19, 2006 08:18 AM (NCdT0)
4
Netcomm gear seems to be problematic the last few years.
I've set up an NB3 from memory. Certainly not the slickest admin interface around.
I hear alot of bad things about Netgear but I haven't personally had alot of problems. Certainly the DSL modems haven't been an issue.
Posted by: Andrew at January 19, 2006 10:00 AM (RWEVY)
5
Some NB5 modems might need either a hardware or a firmware upgrade to get ADSL2+ functionality. There was a big controversy about it a few months ago regarding misleading advertising. They have a free upgrade program running that may be worth looking at:
http://www.netcomm.com.au/Support/NB5/enquiry.php
Posted by: Jojo at January 19, 2006 02:41 PM (OYwJ2)
6
Yep, I saw that. However, I'm coming to the conclusion that it's not a very good modem in general.
We sell NB3's, but only because they have a decent diagnostic routine. The diagnostics on the NB5 are the worst I've ever seen.
[For those who don't know, I work for a phone company. We sell ADSL, but we don't have any good high-end packages because we are re-selling Telstra products. So I went with iiNet, who are the reverse, a great ISP but a lousy phone company.]
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 19, 2006 03:13 PM (RbYVY)
7
Oh. That explains your "...and I oughta know" comment a post or two earlier, then!
*snicker* Makes sense now!
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 19, 2006 03:35 PM (mAAjO)
8
I considered iinet when I was reviewing my broadband. However I decided not to when the rep I was speaking too coudn't give me a definite answer about silent number (which I currently have).
I got a vague answer about Telstra settings coming across as are. But that they had no control over the landline config.
Pretty much figured the same as you, they are up on their internet but not their phones.
Posted by: Andrew at January 19, 2006 04:07 PM (RWEVY)
9
Totally unrelated, but Pixy, you wouldn't happen to know what my mu.nu user name and password is to access http://blog.mu.nu:2082, would you? Could you please e-mail them to me? yossarian9@hotmail.com.
Posted by: Ryan at January 21, 2006 08:25 AM (b4JBG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2006
Friends In Need
Some of you may already know, but
Mikey, one of the family here at mu.nu, recently suffered a stroke and is in hospital in a serious condition. He's undergone surgery and remains in a medically-induced coma while the doctors work to stabilise his condition.
Da Goddess has been in touch with Mikey's family from the start, and visited the hospital last night. She's organising things to help Mikey's family out, so check in at her blog and Mikey's for updates.
She writes:
As far as fundraising efforts go, we're compiling a list of needs and I'll be posting that as time goes on. The main item on the list is getting Mrs. Mikey's mom to San Diego. She's in Colorado right now and we need someone to donate miles or a flight voucher for her to get here. If you have the power to arrange this, please let us know!
If you can help, please drop Da Goddess or me a line. Leave a comment on her blog or email her at Dagoddess at G(ee)Mail.com. Or contact me, and I'll pass it along.
Mikey is part of our family, and his family needs our support right now, so anything you can do will be appreciated.
Update: Plane ticket taken care of. Mikey's
condition has improved; his blood pressure has come down; he's responding to voices and seems to understand what is being said. Not out of the woods yet, but he seems to be on the right road.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
02:19 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
January 13, 2006
Reality Check
My regular readers can skip this one, because they will be able to predict its contents exactly based on the previous two posts.
I do not have 24 Mbps ADSL2+.
I do not have 12 Mbps ADSL2.
I do not, in fact, have ADSL at all.
I do not even have a dial tone, which is the one thing I
had achieved.
All phone companies suck. Without exception.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:47 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:13 AM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:14 AM (a0oF7)
3
m*vie The President's Analyst,
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:14 AM (a0oF7)
4
where the phone company
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:15 AM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:15 AM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:16 AM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:16 AM (a0oF7)
8
Hmmm--questionable content? I must wade through the blacklist to see what naughty words I used.
Looks like it was the ellipses at the end of my remark!
Posted by: Susie at January 14, 2006 03:18 AM (a0oF7)
9
Bet somebody blacklisted the "." (period) again.
Posted by: Light & Dark at January 14, 2006 04:24 AM (M9GWX)
10
ellipses . . . not just periods. If I'm right, leaving a space between them works. (Had the problem on another site.)
Posted by: Kathy K at January 14, 2006 04:44 AM (ntspN)
11
Aha! Fixed! ... Yay ...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 14, 2006 02:07 PM (kTQms)
12
Um, then how exactly did Pixy post this post?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 14, 2006 03:19 PM (+FLIL)
13
I mean, no dial-tone, no DSL of any type... what, did you use smoke signals? What's the bandwidth on that?
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 14, 2006 03:21 PM (+FLIL)
14
Wireless internet. 64k puffs per second.
It's slow, but it's saved my sanity over the past month.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 14, 2006 04:04 PM (7X4Bl)
15
YOU SHAME OUR FOREFATHERS. ONLY TRAITORS LIKE YOU WOULD FLOOD AMERICA WITH DRUGS AND COMMIT "TERRORIST" ACTS LIKE 9/11 AS JUSTIFICATIONS TO SUSPEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. JESUS CHRIST HAS REMOVED HIS BLESSING FROM OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY.
http://www.deanberryministries.org/index3.html
Posted by: DEAN BERRY -- REAL AMERICAN at January 15, 2006 02:58 PM (ZK52L)
16
Uhm... "at Yahoo.com" is right.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 15, 2006 06:00 PM (7+BNY)
17
Wow - you got a Dean Berry spam. How nice for you. (This guy is a Fred Phelps wannabe.)
Posted by: Kathy K at January 16, 2006 01:11 AM (rYfIX)
18
Pixy. Your proclamation about phone companies is quite ironic.
But then having been there, I understand.

Amusing that the ISP turned on the DSL with you having no dial tone.
Posted by: Andrew at January 16, 2006 09:08 AM (RWEVY)
19
I love the message he has above his e-mail button:
"BE A MAN WHEN YOU SEND ME E-MAIL."
Guess that rules women and ducks out. Darn pretard.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 16, 2006 09:59 AM (7+BNY)
20
Pixy. Your proclamation about phone companies is quite ironic.
Hey, who knows better than me?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 16, 2006 10:53 AM (RbYVY)
21
Hmmm....when did you move to America and start shaming forefathers, Pixy? And how come I didn't get any of those drugs???

Posted by: Susie at January 17, 2006 09:09 PM (a0oF7)
22
If its any consolation.
Telstra decided to zap my home phone yesterday. No dial tone. They must be reading this blog !!
Posted by: Andrew at January 18, 2006 12:07 PM (RWEVY)
23
Telstra are evil vermin weasel ratfink bastards. And that's on a good day.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 18, 2006 05:31 PM (RbYVY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Woohoo!
My ADSL is connected! I missed the email yesterday, or I would have tried it out last night.
I'll probably have to get myself a new modem, because my current one only does ADSL 2, not ADSL 2+. So I'd be limited to 12M instead of the full 24. Which would be very sad. But still slightly better than the 64k I've been stuck with for the last five weeks.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:20 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Don't worry - it only took me a week and a half to get my DSL working properly.
Posted by: Kathy K at January 14, 2006 04:45 AM (ntspN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2006
To Zoom Or Not To Zoom
Just got word from my ISP (who shall remain nameless until I have something good to say about them) that my ADSL is currently being provisioned, and within a week I should - if things go right - have a
24 Mbit internet connection.
Whee!
(If you saw that glitch, then yes, I've been spending too much time on web forums lately.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:37 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
bastard
Local cable ISP claims 5 Mbit, but never gets close. And I live too far from the switch to use ADSL, although they're only a 3 Mbit connection anyway. Canada is seriously lacking in high-speed service, which is surprising, considering the high penetration rate.
Truth be told, all that speed wouldn't be much good anyway as monthly transfer is capped around 25 gigs.
What sort of transfer volume are you allowed at that speed, Pixy? And what's your cost like per month?
Paul
Posted by: Light & Dark at January 11, 2006 02:10 PM (M9GWX)
2
It's 80GB per month, and costs $90. The cost is tied to the cap rather than the speed - I could get 24M for $29.95, but with a 600MB cap.
Which would last a little over three minutes.
High speed ADSL only started rolling out in Australia last year, and the main phone company, Telstra, still doesn't have anything faster than 1.5M. So you can only get faster service in specific suburbs - something I checked carefully before I moved house.

Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 11, 2006 02:49 PM (AIaDY)
3
Can I post ANYTHING without it being denied for questionable content? (testing)
Posted by: Sigivald at January 12, 2006 09:26 AM (4JnZM)
4
Evidently, the answer is Yes. Now, why couldn't my innocuous, on-topic post make it through?
Posted by: Sigivald at January 12, 2006 09:26 AM (4JnZM)
5
I've been on Road Runner for ten years and though the price has been a bit high, I have largely been pleased with the service.
Now I'm moving somewhere else, and I don't have any idea what I'll do for broadband, let alone for something that I can put my server on. Yikes!
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 12, 2006 01:27 PM (CJBEv)
6
Sigivald, I think I need to go through the blacklist.
Ugh.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 12, 2006 01:50 PM (AIaDY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 10, 2006
My Ears Are Happy Again
I got myself a pair of
Sennheiser PX100s. I previously had some
Koss Porta Pros, but after a few years of going everywhere with me they were pretty much trashed, and I threw them out.*
I went to get a new set, but the only store nearby that had the Koss phones wanted $150. Since I only paid around $80 for the original set, and since they sell for around $35 retail in America, this seemed a bit excessive. Fortunately, I found the Sennheisers, which are nicer looking and more comfortable, distinctly cheaper (at least in Australia), and sound every bit as good.
It took me several minutes to work out how to unpack them, but you only need to do that once.
By the way, even Sennheiser make lousy headphones.
These ones? Total rubbish. I don't know why a company like Sennheiser would even want to sell them. I can understand why people would buy them; you've just thrown your old headphones away only to find that replacing them is more expensive than you had expected, but you need
something and - oh, those are cheap. Uh, for example. Unfortunately, they're complete crap.
* Apparently, "pretty much trashed" is covered under the warranty, but I didn't know that at the time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:48 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I listen to most of my stuff at home nowadays.
So I have a pair of Sennheiser HD570s. Excellent headphones but you'd look pretty naff walking around the street with them.
Posted by: Andrew at January 11, 2006 08:32 AM (0585Z)
2
Oooooooooohh. Senns!
I used to work in the Radio industry, and you could always tell who'd been in the biz the longest. Rookies had RadioShack cans. Middle-of-the-road had Shures. Lifers had Sennheiser or Koss.
I have a pair of Sony MDR-V100s. They cost me maybe $25, at least seven years ago (I think), and they STILL kick the llama's butt.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 12, 2006 03:34 PM (HoSBk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 06, 2006
Brains, Minds and Consciousness
This is brilliant.
Its a series of videos taken at last year's Skeptics Society conference on, um, brains, minds and consciousness. It's so far covered evolutionary psychology (and why it is wrong), the neural correlates of consciousness (and why idealism is bunk), and where science comes from - and I'm less than a quarter of the way through. It's fascinating stuff and the speakers are wonderful.
It's a three gigabyte download for the "high quality" version (which suffers from some
nasty compression artifacts), but that's about eight hours worth of video. Very highly recommended.
While you're waiting for the download, go
here and vote for Yuri. This blog is running on Kei, but she's not in the poll.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:23 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Already voted, thanks to SDB mentioning the poll. I was somewhat upset by the immense lack of Kei in the poll, though.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 07, 2006 11:12 AM (KnWO3)
2
Kei will get her chance in the next poll.
Posted by: Don at January 07, 2006 11:38 AM (SfgwP)
3
*does happy duck dance*
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 07, 2006 03:22 PM (KnWO3)
4
Hey Pixy,
I need some help with my blog. I sent an email but I'm not sure it went to the right address. Email me when you have time. Thanks

Posted by: Gir at January 08, 2006 01:28 PM (47IiO)
5
You can vote for Kei now.
Posted by: Don at January 19, 2006 01:51 PM (9lP3k)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Two Cows
Sydney: You have two cows. Although you booked them into a private preschool before they were born, you nonetheless find yourself on a waiting list. Meanwhile you keep them on an acreage in Dural, where you form a co-op to share the un-pasteurised milk until the entire group is suddenly wiped out by botulism.
Melbourne: You have two cows. Since no-one drinks dairy products any more, you enroll them at Moonash University. One graduates and goes on to become head of the ABC's Drama Division. The other becomes front page news when it is killed by a tram.
Adelaide: You have two cows. Their milk is undrinkable, so you apply for a government subsidy and buy expensive imported milk like everyone else.
Byron Bay: You have two cows. Duuuuude.
Darwin: You have two cows. Neither of them gives any milk between September and May. No-one cares.
Perth: You have two cows. The minute they turn sixteen they drop out of school and move to Sydney.
Cairns: You have two cows. You trade one for three baby crocodiles and a one-legged kangaroo, and open a wildlife park. Contrary to expectations, it is a huge success.
Canberra: You have two cows. Together you start a business selling cow-oriented adult movies over the internet. You become rich, and decide to go into politics, where you find that the work is the same but the pay is worse.
(
Two cows page via
Chapomatic)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:32 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The fate of Brisbane's two cows can be found here, under "Queensland Democracy".
Posted by: mitchell porter at January 06, 2006 01:41 PM (mr6sB)
2
Existentialist Australia: You have two giraffes. You sell one and use the money for harmonica lessons.
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 06, 2006 03:44 PM (KnWO3)
3
Oops. I meant to type "surrealist", not "existentialist."
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 06, 2006 03:45 PM (KnWO3)
4
Singularitarian: You have two cows. You breed miniature cows and sell the more efficient bovines to smaller farmers and as pets.
Posted by: TallDave at January 12, 2006 01:18 AM (As+Mr)
5
en iyi filmler burda film izle dizi izle online izle dizi izle -film izle - çizgi film izle
Posted by: admilx at December 11, 2010 04:45 AM (8Vsmd)
6
http://www.cheap-pet-food.comhttp://www.vitaminshearthealth.com
Posted by: Linkinpark at May 05, 2011 12:05 AM (ABRf/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 05, 2006
Pixy's Party Hints #1
Instead of inflating your balloons with helium, why not try xenon? Imagine the surprise on the kids' faces when their balloons fall to the ground like rocks! And enjoy the side effects - not only does it make your voice
deeper, it actually
renders you unconscious!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
01:38 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
You have any idea how expensive Xenon is? It isn't at all easy to come by. According to this site:
The rare gases Xenon (Xe), Krypton (Kr) and Neon (Ne) are sourced from the air we breathe. All three are obtained from air separation plants, such as those built and operated by Linde. Because of their very low natural concentration in air, it is only economically viable to recover these rare gases from very large air separation facilities (greater than 1,000 tons of oxygen per day). After nitrogen, oxygen and argon are pulled off of the distillation column, Ne is then recovered by splitting a crude neon stream from the plant and processing it in a separate purification system. For the Xe and Kr, a stream containing a mixture of crude xenon and krypton is finally extracted from the plant and processed in another separate purification and distillation system.
It turns out that Xenon makes up .09 ppm of air. If the plant is producing a thousand metric tons of oxygen per day, it will produce less than 430 grams of xenon per day. Yikes!
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at January 05, 2006 02:22 PM (CJBEv)
2
Questionable content??? ME?!?!?!
Posted by: Wonderduck at January 05, 2006 03:52 PM (mAAjO)
3
Steven - Yep. I was reading up on it and I found the price of $10 per litre. Took me a while to figure out that meant one litre at STP. It's considered too expensive even to use as an anaesthetic.
This isn't "Pixy's Practical Party Hints". I'll save those for another day.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 05, 2006 05:56 PM (LUBRF)
4
That's so random. I love it.
Anyway, who says parties have to be practical? How practical is having a truckload of artifical snow in Texas, in the summer, for a kid's fourth birthday party?
Posted by: owlish at January 05, 2006 11:42 PM (GDqxH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Norton Internet Security Must Die
Die die die!
If you have a Netcomm NB3 ADSL modem, and you have Norton Internet Security installed, you will not be able to configure the modem. Neither the automatic configuration program, nor the manual configuration through your browser will work.
I actually had to get the customer to telnet into modem - fortunately, they were reasonably cluey - before Norton revealed its evil presence and I twigged as to what was going on.
This was, of course,
after we sent them a replacement modem.
Die die die! Die Norton die!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:36 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Was this because Norton was blocking ports ?
I can't imagine why it would block the config page. Obviously a security risk !
Another one of those Twilight Zone bizarro things, huh.
Posted by: Andrew at January 05, 2006 03:31 PM (RWEVY)
2
Actually, it doesn't block the ports, it blocks part of the web pages the modem generates. Which makes it kind of hard to work out what the problem is.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 05, 2006 05:57 PM (LUBRF)
3
Ugh. I just spent an afternoon rooting the thing out of my parents' new computer. It came pre-installed with a 90-day subscription - but I have free software that I use for all of its functions.
OK, so: Add/Remove Programs? It ain't there. Program Files? No Uninstall or Setup. Right, Google: sure enough, there is an uninstall program that you can download from Symantec. Download, run, reboot, problems, debug: the GUI is gone, but the services and processes are still there! Whisky Tango Foxtrot?
I ended up knee-deep in registry keys, but I finally nailed the nasty thing. The uninstall program is apparently designed to work that way - everyone I know who has tried it had the same issue. Simply evil.
Posted by: Dominic at January 06, 2006 09:49 PM (uyRJS)
4
I used to work with a guy who came into my office complaining that his MAC kept crashing all day. I went to his office and found that he had every little bit of Norton for the MAC installed. I removed all of it.
Two days later he came to me and said that all of his Norton Utilities were missing. I asked him if he had been crashing. He said he hadn't since I fixed it. I explained that Norton was the source of the problem.
Four days later he came back to complain that the constant crashes had returned. I checked his system and sure enough he had re-installed Norton.
I explained to him that Norton was causing the crashes but he said he liked Norton. So I told him to stop complaining.
I cherish the day he quit.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at January 15, 2006 10:19 AM (DdRjH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 01, 2006
Comment Of The Day
Over at
Ace's:
Dude, I think you're a dick and all, but in good faith I feel I should point out that you're arguing with Spurwing Plover, who is either a random text generator or 8 years old. We haven't figured out which yet, and he's never gonna answer.
Sortelli to a nameless left-wing interloper.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:45 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Welcome To 2006
Sydney enjoyed a classic New Year's Day today with temperatures hitting 45.2C (113.4F) in parts of Sydney (only 43C/109.4F where I live) ahead of what is euphemistically called a "late southerly change". This means winds of 60 km/h gusting up to 100 km/h, a temperature drop of 15C or more in two hours, lots of branches down and localised power outages. Fortunately, the power outages managed to miss me for once, taking out the northern edge of Hornsby instead.
We don't look likely to get any thunderstorms though. It was so dry today that even the
18° drop we got won't do the trick.
The other side of this is
bushfires, of course. There was a nasty-looking glow to the north-east this evening, which may have been the Central Coast fires or may have been something closer.
Elsewhere in the state, temperatures reached as high as 47C (116.6F) at Ivanhoe. Snow? Don't talk to me about snow.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
09:20 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Geez, hope things cool off for a while and become a lot less windy.
Hope your new year is filled with fun, joy, devoid of tech snafus and NO SPAMMERS.
Posted by: michele at January 02, 2006 02:10 AM (8jkEr)
Posted by: Jim at January 03, 2006 01:33 AM (oqu5j)
3
Just saw coverage of the fires and it looked as frightening as the fires in Texas and Oklahoma.
I hope they end soon and there's no loss of life. please keep us posted as to their impact on your community.
Posted by: Michele at January 03, 2006 09:27 AM (beN4P)
4
Was in Sydney for the New Year and we went on a harbor cruise on the 1st. Absolutely brutal heat. Beautiful city, though! We enjoyed our four days there, and the rest of the stay was nice and cool.
Posted by: Ian at January 12, 2006 09:49 PM (OxEhB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 30, 2005
Six* Easy Pieces
Courtesy of Google. These are things I wrote at various points in the past, back in the days before blogs and munu. I didn't take any particular care to record them (for reasons that will become obvious), but others have done so.
Piece The First: The Great Microprocessor Conspiracy
Uwe Sattelkow wrote:
I need general information about CPUs, about architectures, etc. Anything relating to the topic "What makes a CPU fast?", nothing on specific CPUs. Could anyone tell me, where I can get information from? (webpages, ...)
The critical thing is to use fresh CPUs. It's well known that CPUs slow down over time; for example, my SGI O2 was quite zippy when I bought it back in 1997, today it's rather slow, and I expect within another year or two it will be almost unuseable.
This has given rise to a tremendous scam that has netted major computer vendors billions of dollars over the years. This is how it works:
New CPUs are fresh and clean, with wide-open pathways that allow electrons to zoom freely from pin to pin. As time passes, the occasional electron will get stuck in a tight corner, or overshoot an output buffer and hit the insulator and shatter. These particles - electrons and fragments of electrons such as deutrinos and kleptons - are known in the business as "cruft".
The "cruft" gradually builds up and clogs the once-wide paths, so that the problem starts to accelerate. Soon the once-fast system is getting old and slow, and at this point the vendor steps in and offers an "upgrade".
In fact, this "upgrade" is nothing more than a fresh, clean CPU. Even worse, the vendor will then take your old CPU, clean out the "cruft" with compressed air (they used to use freon, but this has since been banned), and - get this - re-sell the refurbished CPU as an "upgrade" to another customer!
What's more, vendors have over time been *deliberately* making the pathways on chips ever-narrower! The broad 3-micron boulevardes of the old days have been replaced by twisty 0.18 micron alleys, and if they're not stopped, we'll soon be trapped within goat tracks just 0.1 micron wide, forcing the electrons to move sideways!
I encourage everyone to write to their local media outlet or political representative to protest this outrageous behaviour!
(Originally posted to
alt.test.wombat , Feb 24 2001)
* Plus or minus five.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:41 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
What the heck is a "klepton"? Something that steals power?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at December 31, 2005 01:51 AM (CJBEv)
2
The scary thing is that this is posited so deadpan that someone what doesn't know the truth would believe it!
In actuality, it has to do with magic smoke.
Posted by: Wonderduck at December 31, 2005 03:07 PM (mAAjO)
3
So, how's 2006 going for you so far?

Happy New Year, Dear Pixy!
Posted by: Susie at January 01, 2006 02:07 AM (a0oF7)
Posted by: Eric at January 07, 2006 04:49 PM (3maSt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 29, 2005
Die, Cityrail, Die!
Okay, so you needed to close the North Shore line between Christmas and New Year's for trackwork. I can accept that.
But that doesn't mean you can screw up every other train service in Sydney!
It took me 45 minutes just to get from Museum Station to Redfern. Normally, that takes about 5.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:49 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Hey its a good thing you have that wireless internet to while away the time.

Try getting out to Padstow from Ryde using public transport. Don't expect anything less than two hours door to door.
And thats assuming all connecting buses, ferries, trains are running on time. I contemplated this when petrol was soaring past $1.40 a litre.
The alternative is fourty five minutes by car.
Posted by: Andrew at December 29, 2005 10:35 PM (0585Z)
2
Wow, sounds like Chicago, Pixy.
Posted by: Wonderduck at December 30, 2005 01:11 PM (HoSBk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 24, 2005
That's Not Reindeer On The Roof
I have possums.
You live in Hornsby. Everyone has possums.
In my walls.
Yay! Wallpossums!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:35 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Really real live possums? The only time I've ever seen them is when they were splatted.
Posted by: phin at December 24, 2005 03:04 PM (DGPlf)
2
Yeah. Possums, mind you, not opossums. The buggers are everywhere.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 24, 2005 07:22 PM (7X4Bl)
3
Ringtails I don't mind. They're small and cute and don't make much noise or mess.
Brushies are a different matter.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 24, 2005 07:23 PM (7X4Bl)
4
At least they improve the "R-rating" of your insulation. A possum is at least a localized R-15, if not more!
Posted by: Wonderduck at December 24, 2005 09:26 PM (mAAjO)
5
We used to have squirrels in the walls and raccoons on the roof in my parents' house--which was still better than the bats in the attic at my grandfather's!
Posted by: Susie at December 27, 2005 02:00 AM (a0oF7)
6
Um. Yuck.
Have something to pop them with should they break out of the walls?
Posted by: Jennifer at December 28, 2005 01:58 PM (Dq7lR)
7
Wack-A-Mole!
Possum. Whatever.
Posted by: Wonderduck at December 28, 2005 02:57 PM (HoSBk)
8
I have a frying pan. That should work.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 28, 2005 03:07 PM (LUBRF)
9
I think Jen meant something to use *before* they're dead.

Lemons to lemonade time: you need to host the Carnival of Recipes, Varmint Edition!
Posted by: Ted at December 29, 2005 01:14 AM (blNMI)
10
Ted, I think Pixy is fixin' to use the pan as the possumwhacker.
"Possumwhacker." Sounds like something out of the Old West.
Posted by: Wonderduck at December 29, 2005 02:16 AM (mAAjO)
11
Just curious, what's the difference between possum and opossum, aside from the extra "o" on the second?
; )
Hope you had a Merry Christmas!!
Happy New Year!!
Posted by: Chrissy at December 29, 2005 12:24 PM (zJsUT)
12
Opossums are cute and cuddly and live in America, apparently in barrels.
Possums are evil venomous alien parasites, and live in my roof.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 29, 2005 08:22 PM (7X4Bl)
13
Have you tried singing "Come With Me Now to the Wildwood"? That ought to draw the possums out.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at January 03, 2006 07:15 PM (hc1pe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 22, 2005
The Death Of Productivity
Pixy Misa, you have risen to become leader of the Americans. May your reign be long and prosperous. The Americans have knowledge of Irrigation, Mining, Ceremonial Burial, Pottery, and Roads.
That last sentence is true enough.
UFO-1
Detected
Size...................Very Small
Altitude...............Very Low
Heading................East
Speed..................616
And if Pixy can't go to the movies, the movies will have to
come to Pixy. I was pleasantly surprised at how well that runs on my notebook, which only has Intel chipset graphics and is, according to the box, not supported at all. In fact it runs pretty well (scrolling is not as smooth as one might wish, but it's not bad either), and even adapts to the wide-screen 1280x768 format.
So if you don't hear from me for a week or two, it's because I'm busy making movies about alien empires on Mars.
Update: My new film,
Dead Men Don't Die Twice II, seems to be a hit! Well, it's complete rubbish, but it's making money for the studio...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
11:34 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
XCom - now that was a game. And one that deserves a remake.
Posted by: HC at December 23, 2005 03:07 AM (3v/FK)
2
I picked up a Nintendo DS for the kids whilst in Hong Kong.

Mario Kart, Advance Wars and Metroid Pinball are mercifully short to play given their addictiveness.
Posted by: Andrew at December 23, 2005 03:27 PM (RWEVY)
3
If we don't see/read you for a bit I hope your work is fun and that you get to enjoy your holiday.
Posted by: michele at December 24, 2005 12:38 AM (dzg9y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 21, 2005
In Yer Face, Behe!
Via, oh,
lots of places, comes the news of a
well-deserved smackdown of the Intelligent Design movement:
After a searching review of the record and applicable caselaw, we find that while ID arguments may be true, a proposition on which the Court takes no position, ID is not science. We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are: (1) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to ID, employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation science in the 1980's; and (3) ID’s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community. As we will discuss in more detail below, it is additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the subject of testing and research.
Even better:
After this searching and careful review of ID as espoused by its proponents, as elaborated upon in submissions to the Court, and as scrutinized over a six week trial, we find that ID is not science and cannot be adjudged a valid, accepted scientific theory as it has failed to publish in peer-reviewed journals, engage in research and testing, and gain acceptance in the scientific community. ID, as noted, is grounded in theology, not science. Accepting for the sake of argument its proponents’, as well as Defendants’ argument that to introduce ID to students will encourage critical thinking, it still has utterly no place in a science curriculum. Moreover, ID’s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the controversy, but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID.
A personal favourite is this paragraph:
A significant aspect of the IDM is that despite Defendants’ protestations to the contrary, it describes ID as a religious argument. In that vein, the writings of leading ID proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity. Dr. Barbara Forrest, one of Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, is the author of the book Creationism’s Trojan Horse. She has thoroughly and exhaustively chronicled the history of ID in her book and other writings for her testimony in this case. Her testimony, and the exhibits which were admitted with it, provide a wealth of statements by ID leaders that reveal ID’s religious, philosophical, and cultural content.
Proponents of ID have often claimed that ID is not religion, but an alternative scientific explanation. We have already established that ID is not science; what the Dover trial showed was that it is indeed religion, and that those who make claims to the contrary are either unreasonably credulous or lying.
Moreover, in turning to Defendants’ lead expert, Professor Behe, his testimony at trial indicated that ID is only a scientific, as opposed to a religious, project for him; however, considerable evidence was introduced to refute this claim. Consider, to illustrate, that Professor Behe remarkably and unmistakably claims that the plausibility of the argument for ID depends upon the extent to which one believes in the existence of God. (P-718 at 705) (emphasis added). As no evidence in the record indicates that any other scientific proposition’s validity rests on belief in God, nor is the Court aware of any such scientific propositions, Professor Behe’s assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in his view, as is commensurate with other prominent ID leaders, ID is a religious and not a scientific proposition.
And let's not forget our friend
Wedge:
The Wedge Document states in its “Five Year Strategic Plan Summary†that the IDM’s goal is to replace science as currently practiced with “theistic and Christian science.â€
Kind of a giveaway, that.
The Commissar has
the complete ruling. Thanks to Jon at JREF for finding some particularly fine quotes.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:26 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
What a nice Christmas present for those of us who prefer science to fantasy.

(All ironic overtones intended.)
Posted by: Kathy K at December 21, 2005 01:01 PM (Dlv/e)
2
My only hesitation on this is that I am exceedingly wary of a court defining what is and isn't science. While they did get this one right, that doesn't mean they will make every call, nor does it mean they should be in the position to make that call.
Posted by: Chris C. at December 22, 2005 02:39 AM (yeof2)
3
Hi, Pixy! Miss me?
Chris: I'm even more wary of a court trying to define science, and I don't accept the reasoning in 1) or 2) -- that is, I see no objection a priori to appeals to supernatural causes in science, or to dualistic theories. (In fact, quantum mechanics, probably the most thoroughly tested scientific theory we have, is dualistic in its essence.) But 3) -- that the ID objections to the theory of evolution have been refuted -- is correct, so far as those objections were open to empirical tests. That is, where ID is really scientific, it is known to be false. And this is sufficient reason not to teach ID as possibly valid science.
Still, I believe it would be worthwhile to explain Dr. Behe's argument in a science class, provided that it was accompanied by a proper refutation; for the same reason that Lamarck's model of evolution is taught in science classes, along with the facts that refute it. You don't really understand a theory (scientific or not) if you don't know the reasons to doubt it.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 22, 2005 05:52 AM (8LTnv)
4
I'm even more wary of a court trying to define science, and I don't accept the reasoning in 1) or 2) -- that is, I see no objection a priori to appeals to supernatural causes in science, or to dualistic theories.
Yes, we know.
You're wrong.
You can't build a universal, rigorous system of inquiry from dualism or the supernatural (which are essentially the same thing).
Because, by definition, if you can build such a system of inquiry, they are not supernatural/dualistic at all, but natural/monistic.
In fact, quantum mechanics, probably the most thoroughly tested scientific theory we have, is dualistic in its essence.
This was nonsense the last time you claimed it, and it is nonsense now.
You say: I observe the world thus. QM tells me it is different. Therefore, it is dualistic in nature.
No, Michael. It's not dualistic, it's just that you are wrong and QM is right.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 22, 2005 08:57 AM (7X4Bl)
5
My only hesitation on this is that I am exceedingly wary of a court defining what is and isn't science.
They didn't. They merely noted the accepted definition of science, and that ID failed of that definition. Even if you don't accept the definition, you must agree that ID doesn't meet it. (Which is why the Kansas board of education chose to redefine science.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 22, 2005 11:52 AM (LUBRF)
6
Pixy, the real problem that the proponents of "Creationism" have is their inability to accept that God can be at work in both the Big Bang and in Evolution (or any other Scientific activity). Their real problem is that they like to stick to the Sunday School concept (which is a Protestant and NOT a Catholic invention) of instantaneous coming into being of everything in the form it has now. Copernicus and even Thomas Aquinas did not think of the world in those terms, but rather in terms of Aristotle and Plato and their visions of creation and the workings of science.
Science does not disprove God, rather God provides answers for the huge number of things science cannot yet explain and perhaps never will. The Creationist and "Intelligent Design" lobby are afraid of the fact that science shows that creation is far more complex than they would like it to be, that nothing is simple or "balck and white" and must therefore be studied alongside any religious or spiritual understanding.
It really is time that they used a decent translation of the Book of Genesis (or some of the derivative stories it draws upon including the Ballad of Gilgamesh) and dropped the ridiculous translation of the word "Era" as "Day". The originals all speak of the creation happening in periods of time defined as "era" - which can be as long or as short as you like. Ergo, no conflict with Darwinism or with the age of the Cosmos.
Posted by: The Gray Monk at December 23, 2005 01:47 AM (X4ErV)
7
I prepared a lengthy reply to your last comment, Pixy, which your system refused to post. Was this intentional on your part?
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 23, 2005 07:03 AM (8LTnv)
8
Michael, no, but you might have tripped over the comment filtering system, particularly if you had lots of links.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 23, 2005 11:20 AM (LUBRF)
9
You say: I observe the world thus. QM tells me it is different. Therefore, it is dualistic in nature.
No, I don't say that. I say QM is Dualist because the mathematics of QM describe two different, mutually exclusive dynamical laws -- state evolution and state reduction -- and don't specify which one operates at any given moment. You can claim QM is Monist only by holding the "many worlds" interpretation, according to which state reduction never actually happens; and that interpretation isn't tenable, for the following reason.
Take the simplest possible quantum system, a single spin-1/2 particle. QM says the spin state of this particle is, at all times, some member of a 2-dimensional Hilbert space; that is, it can be expressed as w|up> + z|dn>, where |up> has the particle spinning at 1/2 times h-bar around an axis, and |dn> has it spinning at -1/2 times h-bar around the same axis. QM also says that if you measure the particle's spin around some other axis, you will get a value of either 1/2 or -1/2, and the probability of either depends on the angle betwee the particle's spin axis and the measuring axis. And this prediction is confirmed by all experiments: what QM says, is what we observe.
Now how do you interpret this, assuming many-worlds is correct? It is claimed that at the moment of measurement the device measuring the particle's spin goes into a state correlated with the particle's, a state expressible as w|see up> + z|see dn>; that the components of this state never interact again, and therefore the two "worlds" of |see up> and |see dn> are unaware of each other; and that if the spin measurement is repeatedly performed, in the large majority of the resulting histories the statistical predictions of QM are confirmed.
The problem is, the basis {|up>, |dn>} for the Hilbert space in question is not unique, or even preferred. The particle's state can be expressed just as easily in other bases -- say, {|up>+|dn>, |up>-|dn>} -- and the correlated state of the measuring device can then be expressed in the basis {|see up>+|see dn>, |see up>-|see dn>}. And the |see up>+|see dn> component never interacts again with the |see up>-|see dn> component. So |see up>+|see dn> picks out a "world", just as valid (or invalid) as the one |see up> picks out; but in the |see up>+|see dn> "world" the particle's spin is not 1/2 or -1/2 times h-bar!
The truth is, picking out a "world" is not licensed by the law of state evolution at all. Choosing a basis for the space of states is only a mathematical convenience, unless state reduction is real. Therefore many-worlds, by denying the reality of state reduction, "answers" the question of why experimenters invariably observe either |up> or |dn>, and not |up>+|dn>, by turning it into a metaphysical problem, of no scientific interest -- that is, by declaring it unanswerable. This is far more than announcing a gap in our knowledge of nature; it's an announcement that the gap will never be closed.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 24, 2005 05:59 AM (8LTnv)
10
Odd, that -- the filtering system rejects the word ignoramus.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 24, 2005 06:01 AM (8LTnv)
11
Or maybe not.
Oh well. Would you care to comment on these remarks on teleology and the principle of least action in physics?
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 24, 2005 06:08 AM (8LTnv)
12
State reduction - the collapse of the wave function - is an interesting issue if one assumes it happens. WHICH IS A MATTER OF INTERPRETATIONS OF QM. You know that. It's not QM itself, it's the interpretation. Otherwise there couldn't be mathematically isomorphic interpretations where wave functions did not collapse, and there are.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 24, 2005 07:14 PM (7X4Bl)
13
Reading that article now.If we ask whether the order of nature reveals an intention in the mind of God, we will get no answer from science.The answer is "What are you talking about? I'm a physicist!"
Okay, I've finished reading it. It's worthless drivel.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 24, 2005 07:19 PM (7X4Bl)
14
State reduction - the collapse of the wave function - is an interesting issue if one assumes it happens.
Apparently you didn't understand what I said the last time. My point is, even if one assumes that state reduction never happens, the resulting interpretation of QM isn't monistic. It only looks that way if one doesn't think it through.
To repeat, the basic question is "why do I never observe a particle in the state |up>+|dn>?" Many-worlds proponents say, because when I observe a particle in that state my own state becomes |see up>+|see dn>; the |see up> component of my state observes the |up> component of the particle's state, the |see dn> component of my state observes the |dn> component of the particle's state, and everything balances out.
Many-worlds proponents don't say, however, why we are supposed to separate my state into those two specific components. QM itself is agnostic on that point -- the mathematics works out just the same, whatever basis we adopt. And certainly you haven't given a reason; all you've said so far is that state reduction is not the reason, since it never actually happens. I put it to you: what physical process distinguishes the states |up> and |dn> from their linear combinations, if not state reduction? And, if there isn't any, why do I analyze my state in terms of |see up> and |see dn>, and not in terms of some other pair of basic states?
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 25, 2005 06:50 AM (hc1pe)
15
About that article: Have you ever read Ted Chiang's "The Story of Your Life"? It involves aliens to whom the principle of least action is intuitively obvious, and our intuitive idea of causation is a difficult and subtle thing.
Posted by: Michael Brazier at December 25, 2005 06:55 AM (hc1pe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 14, 2005
Potential Bombshell
If
this story holds up, it could spell big trouble for the NSW Government and the Police Commissioner:
Senior police today pledged to keep up their presence on Sydney's streets as members of a Muslim youth group and the surf movement held peace talks on the boardwalk at Cronulla.
But a leaked document has indicated that police were not equipped to respond to Monday's violence in Cronulla, in which people were assaulted and cars, shopfronts and windows were smashed.
The Seven Network said it had obtained a police incident report instructing officers to stay away from one of the trouble spots – believed to be Punchbowl Park in Sydney's west – on Monday night.
The park is believed to have been the meeting place for scores of men who formed a vehicle convoy which drove to Cronulla unimpeded by police.
The report showed those in the crowd were suspected of being Middle Eastern criminals who had been involved in malicious damage and civil disobedience offences throughout the Sutherland Shire, the network said.
The report said "a direction was given to police about midnight not to enter the area and antagonise these persons".
Right. Don't antagonise the rioters, because they might, um, riot.
I call for the 48-hour rule on this, though.
(via
comments at Tim Blair's)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
08:19 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
(Checking the time.) Hmm. I'll be back...
Posted by: Kathy K at December 16, 2005 12:12 PM (k5+K/)
2
It's been sort-of-confirmed, but officials are busy weaselling.
It probably won't amount to much after all, at least not until the next election.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at December 16, 2005 04:04 PM (LUBRF)
3
Well - then let's hope it's (if it turns out to be true) not forgotten at the next election.
Posted by: Kathy K at December 17, 2005 11:03 AM (p/PDy)
4
Sounds just like the UK. Don't impede the rioters and certainly don't prosecute anyone.
Posted by: The Gray Monk at December 23, 2005 01:30 AM (X4ErV)
5
cheap louboutin christian louboutin sale christian louboutin cheap discount christian louboutin red sole heels cheap louboutin shoes sale Christian Louboutin UK red bottom shoes louboutin sale 2011 christian louboutin christian louboutin 2011 louboutin shoes
Posted by: 2011 christian louboutin at May 30, 2011 12:31 PM (3GvUO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sydney Riots, Day Thr... Oh.
It appears that if you fill the area with police and arrest the rioters at gunpoint,
they stop rioting.
A church burned down overnight and that is being investigated as arson, but other than that, not much happened last night.
Even the possum turf war that has been waking me at dawn every day seems to have been called off. Good work.
For those of you trying to make sense of things from the media reports - never an easy task -
this timeline from the Wog Blogger may help.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
07:23 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
<< Page 19 >>
Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.0726 seconds.
49 queries taking 0.0474 seconds, 189 records returned.
Page size 132 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.