I said I would and I am....
I know he can take care of himself.
I'm not pissed.
In fact, I'm having a ball, making a person named "JB" get his panties in a wad and show off his incredible assininity.
Twice.
His first two comments were so over the top and outta line...
Christ, it was killin' me not to take him apart, point-by-point all the way down the line. I tried.
I reeeeally tried to just make a point and let it go, but noooooo. We can't DO that, can we? All I said was "Back off", basically, and now I'm a, what again?... a "radically ignorant groupie".
On top of being a sexist. Ooookay.
*lmbo* Cheese and Rice freakin' Krispies. Would it surprise any of you if I said that the way to get a point across to Rob is NOT by attacking him repeatedly? I didn't think so. Some people (JB!!!) are fuckin' stupid. As in: capital "STU" and capital "PID". Anyway...
if ya wanna know what I'm going on about now, it's ovah heah. Update @12:47am...
Can some of you guys please read Rob's post and tell me if you see him blaming his son for anything?
JB is certifiable.
Comments
1
Seriously
Do you think your groupies will prove themselves any more enlightened than yourself?
You read what you want. That is your call, and your call alone. Ignorance of words and the meaning thereof, is neither my concern nor my charge.
Truth, is. Ad hominem (such as yours) slams are what they have always been--ad hominem. Either have a real argument--which I will happily debate to the nth degree (why do you think Rob does not argue with me?), or STFU. You are a proving yourself to be a living example of the proverbial saying:
If you have nothing to say, you have nothing to say.
Clarity for clarity's sake, and all.
hehe
For the record, it is your panties that exist in the particular formation you describe . . .
Mine fit fine. Do better than a cliche, Dude.
I am singularly unimpressed by your very serious attempts at logic 101.
'Nuff said . . . unless you are a masochist.
:-)
Do you think your groupies will prove themselves any more enlightened than yourself?
You read what you want. That is your call, and your call alone. Ignorance of words and the meaning thereof, is neither my concern nor my charge.
Truth, is. Ad hominem (such as yours) slams are what they have always been--ad hominem. Either have a real argument--which I will happily debate to the nth degree (why do you think Rob does not argue with me?), or STFU. You are a proving yourself to be a living example of the proverbial saying:
If you have nothing to say, you have nothing to say.
Clarity for clarity's sake, and all.
hehe
For the record, it is your panties that exist in the particular formation you describe . . .
Mine fit fine. Do better than a cliche, Dude.
I am singularly unimpressed by your very serious attempts at logic 101.
'Nuff said . . . unless you are a masochist.
:-)
Posted by: jb at May 14, 2005 02:11 AM (NbbWR)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0049 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0037 seconds, 9 records returned.
Page size 4 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.