Fun With Vocabulary! Really!
At the beginning of each school year, I have a dilemma: How best to encourage seven separate sections of high school English students to enjoy and appreciate words? Building a large and flexible vocabulary is obviously important, but it's not so obvious to teenagers whose growing bodies are awash with love hormones and who often have the attention spans of gnats.
One of several methods I use is an unusual vocabulary quiz that illustrates the importance of knowing the denotations (definitions) and connotations (images and ideas associated with the word) of words. Because it's fun and provokes much delighted snickering (you'll see what I mean), the kids enjoy it, and it conditions them to do and even enjoy more traditional vocabulary work. We English teachers are sneaky that way (cue flashing lightning, thunder and maniacal laughter)! So in honor of Labor Day—and hopefully you're resting from your labors—here's a bit of fun with vocabulary. The answers appear after the jump. Don't peek or you'll be looking at detention, little mister/missy! Directions: Answer each question with a yes or no. (1) It is a presidential election year. The candidate you intend to vote for, responding to a sensational news story, admits that he is a practicing HETEROSEXUAL. Should you vote for him? (2) Your favorite minister, responding to persistent rumors, admits to the congregation that despite being married for 26 years, he has consistently practiced MONOGAMY. Should he be run off? (3) You have had your eye on a guy/girl for some time. You’re sure that they will go out with you if you ask, but you learn that they are POLYDACTYL. Would it be medically safe to ask them out? (4) Your favored candidate for the U.S. Senate delivers a speech wherein he announces his absolute support for FEDERALISM. Would it be un-American to vote for him? (5) You are seriously considering voting for an obviously intelligent, capable candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives when you learn that he is a lifelong LIBERTARIAN. Would it be moral to vote for him? (6) The President is running for reelection. He proudly states that he will aggressively pursue a FECKLESS foreign policy. Should he be reelected, particularly during wartime? (7) Your favored candidate for the U.S. Senate is forced to admit that he once EXPECTORATED in the presence of women and children. Does this make him unfit for office? (ANSWERS:
(1) HETEROSEXUAL: He is attracted to the opposite sex. So most Americans would have no problem voting for him. California is another thing entirely. (2) MONOGAMY: Don't run him off! He has been faithful to his wife. For a minister, that's a good thing! (3) POLYDACTYL: Medically safe? Yes. They have more than the usual number of fingers or toes. This one usually creeps out many of my kids. (4) FEDERALISM: Considering that Federalism is our way of government, this one is OK. Yes, I know our current federal government doesn't recognize Federalism, but I'm just an English teacher. It's not my fault. (5) LIBERTARIAN: It's moral to vote for him. Libertarians want maximum personal freedom and minimal government intrusion. Yes, I know our current federal government doesn't buy this either and it's still not my fault. (6) FECKLESS: No, he should not be reelected as he plans to pursue a weak and ineffective foreign policy. Hey! That sounds familiar… (7) EXPECTORATED: Unfit for office? Nah. He spat. If that's the worst he's done, he's a virtual saint compared to many of our politicians. (Posted by: MikeM at 11:28 PM
Comments
(Then again, I am a voracious reader, and made the third grade school library teacher uneasy when I kept going to the 8th grade books when she thought I should be reading Golden books)
I got an email from my youngest daughter's high school English teacher once, complete with typos and misspellings, not to mention grammar errors. She never replied to my suggestion that she learn to use spell check and possibly study some of the material she was supposed to be teaching.
Posted by: Chuck Kuecker at September 05, 2011 09:27 AM (LgHPp)
I haven't been able to do this since Feb with-out throwing-up.
++++++++++++++++++++++
(13) The opponent of your favored presidential candidate delivers a passionate campaign speech wherein he accuses your candidate of MASTICATING at least three times a day. Should you be concerned about this?
Posted by: PurpleDragon at September 05, 2011 10:53 AM (znUFP)
As for rictus, I always thought it was a grimace, as of a person in pain.
Personally I osculate my wife at least once a day.
Posted by: NevadaSteve at September 05, 2011 04:45 PM (MEr5F)
Posted by: Jay Tea at September 05, 2011 06:53 PM (Dui0O)
Posted by: Neo at September 05, 2011 10:52 PM (e8kgV)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0099 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.008 seconds, 13 records returned.
Page size 11 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.