North Carolina Governor Declares Every Concealed Carry Permit in eastern NC Invalid Due to Hurricane Irene
Thanks to a brain-dead state law foisted upon us by a Democratic state legislature (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.7), every time the governor—in this instance, Democrat Beverly Perdue—declares a state of emergency, it is illegal from that moment onward to carry a concealed weapon until the state of emergency has been declared over.
We've dealt with this bit of Democrat-generated stupidity before. Governor Purdue made this declaration while the state was at work, meaning everyone who has a carry permit and lives east of Interstate 95 who was away from home instantly became a criminal by proclamation. If we look at Google Maps, that means that a carry permit holder in Wilson dining at the Cracker Barrel is perfectly legal, but the permit holder a block to the east filling up on gas at the Kangaroo Express is now a criminal. Ridiculous. Update: I'd forgotten we were stuck with this crap last year as well. Update: Looks like I was wrong about the I-95 cutoff. It includes those entire counties. John Richardson notes that Perdue issued a statement with her executive order that gun provisions would not take effect, but as South Carolina's Joe Wilson might say, Bev Perdue, you lie.
14-288.7. Transporting dangerous weapon or substance during emergency; possessing off premises; exceptions. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful for any person to transport or possess off his own premises any dangerous weapon or substance in any area: (1) In which a declared state of emergency exists; or (2) Within the immediate vicinity of which a riot is occurring. (b) This section does not apply to persons exempted from the provisions of G.S. 14-269 with respect to any activities lawfully engaged in while carrying out their duties. (c) Any person who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
In other words, Perdue does not have the authority to declare the ban null and void, anymore than the governor can arbitrarily decide than any other law no longer applies. While a state of emergency is in effect in North Carolina, taking guns of your property is illegal, whether concealed or openly carried. We need to address this flaw in our gun laws as soon as the NC Legislature returns to Raleigh.
Bev Perdue is incorrect in her assertions that the declaration of the State of Emergency does not trigger firearm restrictions. As I noted last year when she invoked a State of Emergency in the face of Hurricane Earl, if she uses Article 36A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, it invokes G.S. § 14-288.7 which states in part, "it is unlawful for any person to transport or possess off his own premises any dangerous weapon or substance in any area" if a state of emergency is declared. Just because she is the governor does not give Bev Perdue the authority to ignore plainly written state laws when it is politically inconvenient for her.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 11:16 AM
Comments
Posted by: dunce at August 25, 2011 01:06 PM (zx/x4)
Posted by: softwind at August 25, 2011 09:49 PM (XCPFp)
So...Citizen Joe has a CCW permit for protection when there is a breakdown in civil order. And now that there is a widespread breakdown in civil order where the police can NOT respond in any way, shape, or form, his Government is ordering him to be disarmed. Now that just makes perfect sense. NOT. Well, I suppose it does to a Democrat.
Tell me, has there been a movement in North Carolina to go string up their legislature from lamp-posts and find people to fill those seats who are not old-Guard Statists? Just curious.
Orion
Posted by: Orion at August 25, 2011 09:55 PM (/QtKB)
This would be a good time to start repealing laws like this.
I'm still outraged that Johnston County passed an ordinance outlawing discharging a firearm while intoxicated.
Posted by: Adobe Walls at August 25, 2011 10:26 PM (mLThi)
Posted by: WilcoTangoFoxtrot at August 25, 2011 10:43 PM (ap5kG)
It needs to be modified to remove "while carrying out their duties". Then it will be fine for CCP holders.
Posted by: _Jon at August 25, 2011 10:56 PM (fVXaI)
Can this law be unconstitutional? As a North Carolinian, I'd like to see that changed as soon as the legislature goes back into session.
Interestingly Dr. Melissa Clouthier over at melissablogs.com recommends on her preparedness list (she was in Houston for that big one):
10.Guns and ammo. Make sure and have it ready. There was no looting in Houston. Know why? Self protection. People get desperate. When we left and finally evacuated a week after the last hurricane, we stopped at a private gas station that our friends are part owner of — we needed to top off the tank after doing some running around. A very frantic dude came up (he was armed) who wanted gas. We all were armed (four men and me and the kids). It was a good thing we were.
-----------------------------------
Maybe someone should give Beverly a clue.
Posted by: JAL at August 25, 2011 10:57 PM (zVVOY)
BTW, why does NC still have a requirement for the Sheriff's permission to exercise one's Constitutional right to acquire a pistol for self defense. I thought the "Black Codes" of the early 20th century had been repealed? Not in NC.
Posted by: Big Boy at August 25, 2011 11:05 PM (iEVLc)
Meanwhile - there's always open-carry, which is not only legal (even during a SoE) in nearly all of NC, but also a nice deterrent to potential "visitors" in the immediate aftermath of hurricanes, etc.
Just sayin'...
Posted by: J.S.Bridges at August 25, 2011 11:06 PM (uRFWZ)
-- Keep your damned mouth shut.
-- If you don't have a metal detector, I don't have a gun.
Posted by: James at August 25, 2011 11:08 PM (BGMyj)
Posted by: Zainuddin at August 25, 2011 11:23 PM (WsyCj)
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?id=6896
Posted by: NC Citizen at August 25, 2011 11:28 PM (tJ6R6)
Posted by: Srs Question at August 25, 2011 11:28 PM (TVbKO)
Posted by: Parker at August 25, 2011 11:30 PM (YD4vH)
Posted by: Mark at August 25, 2011 11:32 PM (vzQDL)
Posted by: Seriosly at August 26, 2011 12:34 AM (HXEJP)
Posted by: icc at August 26, 2011 12:45 AM (aEUs2)
Posted by: Eric at August 26, 2011 01:14 AM (MIE6l)
Posted by: Lee Reynolds at August 26, 2011 01:19 AM (zkRoG)
Posted by: Bobo at August 26, 2011 01:20 AM (R/Ze+)
The increase in gun grabber strokes and heart attacks would be regrettable. Let us pray.
Posted by: TMLutas at August 26, 2011 05:19 AM (wDPcm)
Posted by: -1Steve at August 26, 2011 05:26 AM (zQ5Sx)
Disaster prep must include a means to protect yourself from predators. During Katrina, even the police were looting stores.
My gun, my choice.
Posted by: MAJ Mike at August 26, 2011 06:28 AM (FLoub)
How would you even know it has been declared?
Posted by: Bram at August 26, 2011 06:29 AM (K5g5u)
Posted by: Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner at August 26, 2011 06:36 AM (8+hJA)
Certainly no other constitutional right is subject to the piecemeal,arbitrary suspension described here. What compelling governmental interest is served by suspending CCW's on one side of the street but not the other?
Posted by: Bill at August 26, 2011 06:39 AM (u+8qs)
> Posted by: Srs Question at August 25, 2011 11:28 PM
This.
Posted by: Don at August 26, 2011 06:58 AM (JlBSZ)
Posted by: Willy at August 26, 2011 07:16 AM (KX7KT)
We did in Texas. It's worked out just fine.
Posted by: David Rogers at August 26, 2011 07:38 AM (w0RGn)
Posted by: apvbguy at August 26, 2011 07:51 AM (MWfDZ)
Posted by: seaweaver at August 26, 2011 07:55 AM (LlMh0)
Just when he/she might actually need it.
Posted by: -1Mastro at August 26, 2011 08:31 AM (Eql16)
Important details: it's the entire counties, not just those portions east of I-95.
It's transport of all "dangerous weapons", not just concealed ones (as noted by others).
Perdue ought to know better, having made this mistake during dove season (there's two ways to declare an emergency, one of which doesn't invoke the ban and for some reason she used both with a signing statement that the ban wasn't in effect ... but that's not within her power).
And while the NRA is not involved, the SAF and others are supporting Gura in a lawsuit filed quite some time ago to end this idiocy.
And, yeah, a state which combines too much of the worst of California PLUS the post-Reconstruction South is none too attractive.
Posted by: Lina Inverse at August 26, 2011 08:33 AM (2rwFe)
(N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.7) Is Suspended.
You May retain your rights...(may..aint dat nice)
cw
PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY
BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Governor by the Constitution and the laws of the State of North Carolina:
Section 1.
I declare that a state of emergency exists in the following counties in North Carolina due to the approach of Hurricane Irene:
Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Section 2.
I order all state and local government entities and agencies to cooperate in the implementation of the provisions of this proclamation and the provisions of the North Carolina Emergency Operations Plan.
Section 3.
I delegate to Reuben F. Young, Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety, or his designee, all power and authority granted to me and required of me by Article 1 of Chapter 166A of the General Statutes for the purpose of implementing the State’s Emergency Operations Plan and to take such further action as is necessary to promote and secure the safety and protection of the populace in North Carolina.
Section 4.
Further, Secretary Young, as chief coordinating officer for the State of North Carolina, shall exercise the powers prescribed in G. S.§ 143B-476.
Section 5.
I further direct Secretary Young to seek assistance from any and all agencies of the United States Government as may be needed to meet the emergency and seek reimbursement for costs incurred by the State in responding to this emergency.
Section 6.
I hereby order this proclamation: (a) to be distributed to the news media and other organizations calculated to bring its contents to the attention of the general public; (b) unless the circumstances of the state of emergency prevent or impede, to be promptly filed with the Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety, the Secretary of State, and the clerks of superior court in the counties to which it applies; and (c) to be distributed to others as necessary to assure proper implementation of this proclamation.
Section 7.
This order is adopted pursuant to my powers under Article 1 of Chapter 166A of the General Statutes and under Article 36A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes. It does not trigger the limitations on weapons in G.S. § 14-288.7 or impose any limitation on the consumption, transportation, sale or purchase of alcoholic beverages.
Section 8.
This Executive Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect for thirty (30) days or the duration of the emergency, whichever is less.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina at the Capitol in the City of Raleigh, this 24th day of August in the year of our Lord two thousand and eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.
__________________________________________
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Posted by: seaweaver at August 26, 2011 08:40 AM (LlMh0)
Posted by: Chris in N.Va. at August 26, 2011 09:52 AM (kVR+3)
Posted by: slamo at August 26, 2011 09:53 AM (2+i0L)
The statute in question simply says it applies "in any area [...] In which a declared state of emergency exists". What is the difference in the other method of declaring a state of emergency that means it doesn't trigger this statute? The statute itself does not differentiate between how the state of emergency is declared - thus, based on the plain language, it should apply in any declared state of emergency.
Posted by: Jake at August 26, 2011 09:58 AM (zKPMH)
Posted by: Jake at August 26, 2011 10:02 AM (zKPMH)
"§ 14‑288.1. Definitions.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this Article:
§ 14‑288.1. Definitions. [...] (3) "Declared state of emergency": A state of emergency found and proclaimed by the Governor under the authority of G.S. 14‑288.15, by any mayor or other municipal official or officials under the authority of G.S. 14‑288.12, by any chairman of the board of commissioners of any county or other county official or officials under the authority of G.S. 14‑288.13, by any chairman of the board of county commissioners acting under the authority of G.S. 14‑288.14, by any chief executive official or acting chief executive official of any county or municipality acting under the authority of any other applicable statute or provision of the common law to preserve the public peace in a state of emergency, or by any executive official or military commanding officer of the United States or the State of North Carolina who becomes primarily responsible under applicable law for the preservation of the public peace within any part of North Carolina.
Also interesting is that it seems the governor's authority to declare a disaster under Article 1 of Chapter 166A requires - unless the President has declared a disaster under the Stafford Act - that a local official has declared a state of emergency under Article 36A Chapter 14 - thus invoking the weapons ban anyway.
Posted by: Jake at August 26, 2011 10:31 AM (zKPMH)
I have "FIREARMS", not WEAPONS.
WEAPONS are carried by criminals, police officers and the military, WEAPONS are for OFFENSE.
I have a "FIREARM" for DEFFENSIVE purposes, hence I have a "CONCELED CARRY PERMIT"....you don't see it, it isn't OFFENSIVE!
Your DA's hate a person that uses this logic!
Posted by: Michael at August 26, 2011 10:46 AM (Yojj7)
Posted by: davisbr at August 26, 2011 10:57 AM (uCShA)
Posted by: Hober at August 26, 2011 11:04 AM (gAi9Z)
Posted by: Jake at August 26, 2011 11:42 AM (zKPMH)
"Section 3.
I delegate to Reuben F. Young, Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety, or his designee, all power and authority granted to me and required of me by Article 1 of Chapter 166A of the General Statutes for the purpose of implementing the State’s Emergency Operations Plan and to take such further action as is necessary to promote and secure the safety and protection of the populace in North Carolina."
By-the-by, anyone that has taken the NRA's CCW course should know that police officers only hit their targets 20% of the time in a stressful situation. (Morale: It's useless to carry a cop in your pocket.)
I love all your comments and I am with y'all in Ohio. Also, I was just down through the South last month and saw all this "Post Re-construction" in Va and NC and just about cried.
Take care and stay safe my good neighbors.
Posted by: Asherwood at August 26, 2011 11:44 AM (cGttm)
But, you know, shouldn't we be concerned that the riff-raff may attempt to speed away from the storm’s path of destruction?
Perhaps we should revoke drivers licenses as well...?
Posted by: organczar at August 26, 2011 11:50 AM (eVPGA)
Is that correct?
Posted by: I Wandered in, interesting discussion at August 26, 2011 12:31 PM (UxKxm)
Posted by: WOZ at August 26, 2011 12:43 PM (o4Cr2)
Posted by: Mike L at August 26, 2011 01:41 PM (NIjIM)
Just like what was noted in the original post. When the governor made the declaration, thousands of normally law abiding citizens were suddenly breaking the law - without ever doing anything differently than they were before the declaration, and probably without even knowing it.
Posted by: Jake at August 26, 2011 03:04 PM (zKPMH)
Posted by: Big Ray at August 26, 2011 03:57 PM (G3wkb)
I live here and I did know about this garbage...
Posted by: Big Ray at August 26, 2011 03:59 PM (G3wkb)
Posted by: MassJim at August 26, 2011 04:10 PM (V6DPF)
I thought Olympia, WA was bad,
Retards.
Shoot 'em any way if you're fearing for your life.
Posted by: Independent Voter at August 26, 2011 04:15 PM (WKO1R)
Posted by: -1crypticguise at August 26, 2011 11:49 PM (VE4l0)
Posted by: -1Jim(The Patriot) Buckingham at August 27, 2011 10:34 AM (x/2SS)
Posted by: Dennis at August 27, 2011 02:57 PM (awqYm)
I doubt a DA would press charges against a CCW or a judge would waste time on it.
Posted by: borderraven at August 27, 2011 03:51 PM (OSmIk)
Posted by: Parker at August 27, 2011 11:28 PM (YD4vH)
Posted by: Bill at August 28, 2011 08:56 AM (rcUhY)
Can ayone tell me ??
And if elected and the Gorvernor turns on the People why do the People allowe it to happen?
I am confused
Posted by: Not Me at August 28, 2011 03:49 PM (3i5Ls)
"This order is adopted pursuant to my powers under Article 1 of Chapter 166A of the General Statutes and under Article 36A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes. It does not trigger the limitations on weapons in G.S. § 14-288.7 or impose any limitation on the consumption, transportation, sale or purchase of alcoholic beverages."
Posted by: michael at August 28, 2011 09:37 PM (LdwOU)
Posted by: Alvar at August 29, 2011 11:43 AM (PYzg+)
Posted by: LOS at August 29, 2011 12:53 PM (V5HVe)
Had North Carolina passed and enacted Senate Bill 594 this year, such local action would be prohibited and unlawful. The National Rifle Association sought passage of this legislation -- www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?id=6896.
Posted by: Truth & Freedom at August 29, 2011 01:16 PM (0/15I)
Mazel Tov to the governor! She will need a lot of Tov!
Posted by: It is I only at August 29, 2011 06:21 PM (xAbf5)
I carried mine today anyway.
Posted by: -1 a ccw holder at August 29, 2011 06:35 PM (saPI9)
Thursday, June 09, 2011
Contact Your State Senator Immediately!
As the end of the 2011 legislative session is quickly approaching, the NRA continues to work diligently to protect your Second Amendment rights in Raleigh. Senate Bill 594, an emergency powers bill introduced by state Senator Doug Berger (D-7) has been stalled since its introduction.
Even though this legislation is of great importance to law-abiding gun owners, the Senate Republican leadership is currently preventing S 594 from being considered, even telling Senate colleagues not to offer this language as an amendment to other firearm-related bills.
Senate Bill 594, an emergency powers bill introduced by state Senator Doug Berger (D-7), would ensure that our Right to Keep and Bear Arms cannot be suspended through gun confiscation during a declared state of emergency as happened in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina.
Time is running out - it is critical that you act quickly and let your state Senator know how important this legislation is. Please contact your state Senator and urge him or her to convince Senate leadership to bring S 594 to the Senate floor. Contact information for your state Senator can be found by clicking here.
Posted by: robotkilr at August 29, 2011 10:16 PM (B5HYj)
Well, ya can tell I'm new to this law. I went to Walmart a day before Irene came thru and loaded up on ammo. And had plans to evac WITH my guns and ammo and my 3 yo daughter if the weather turned for the worse. Didn't have to do all that, but best believe I will prepare the same in any other event of natural disaster or state emergency. Shame on you Bev.
Posted by: Bella83 at August 31, 2011 06:57 PM (MvuGH)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0616 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0514 seconds, 76 records returned.
Page size 46 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.