It's a Trap!
I've seen several claims in the past 24 hours that "prove" that Attorney General Eric Holder, or Congress, or the President, or the Pope, knew about Gunwalker/Fast and Furious because of a speech someone made, or because of legislation being proposed or because of a line item in the Stimulus bill.
I would strongly urge caution in these matters. Please Keep in mind that Gunrunner is a long-term cartel weapons interdiction program that kicked off during the previous administration. there is no indication that Gunrunner has ever been anything but above-board. The program/project framework has long been used in business and government, with the program being the general vision, with individual projects/operations as steps towards realizing that vision. It looks like this:- Program
- Project 1
- Project 2
- Project 3
- etc...
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 07:31 AM
Comments
I think that depends on how 'justice' is defined. Will someone take the fall for this? Of course. It's gotten to far along to avoid that now.
The real question - and the one that most concerns me - is whether or not the people who are actually responsible will be the same as those taking the fall.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at July 08, 2011 07:37 AM (eqTkp)
To have gone after Nixon by attacking CREEP as a whole would have been a failure, because CREEP could claim legitimate activity and Nixon supporters would use this to cloud the issue. It was necessary to focus on the Howard Hunt/G. Gordon Liddy team and activities. Likewise, to now go after Eric Holder or others by attacking Gunrunner would be a failure, because Holder/Obama supporters will use its legitimate and legal activities to cloud the issues of the wrongdoing of Gunwalker/Fast & Furious.
Correct?
Posted by: Astroprisoner at July 08, 2011 09:17 AM (PYaqh)
Posted by: cvsusn at July 08, 2011 09:30 AM (xalGD)
Posted by: drjohn at July 08, 2011 10:05 AM (3/BxG)
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2011/05/25/obama-were-working-on-gun-control-under-the-radar/
Posted by: Robert Hanson at July 08, 2011 10:06 AM (F5gEf)
At the time, I wondered about the meaning of the odd-sounding "focused forward traces" and "proactive investigative techniques."
Has fast and furious has clarified that now?
(My 2009 post is here http://foreignobjectdamage.blogspot.com/2009/02/does-recovery-bill-fund-gun-control.html
)
Posted by: FOD at July 08, 2011 10:22 AM (Rq1I7)
I think the basic difference is allowing the guns being 'forward traced' to cross the border into Mexico.
Posted by: Syl at July 08, 2011 12:08 PM (hncbs)
Posted by: dkhenilsneoi at July 08, 2011 12:10 PM (CbAE5)
I hope so but I have very serious doubts. There has long been two sets of rules, one for the very rich and the political class, and one for the rest of us. Some of the lower level people will certainly pay, but what is the likelihood than anything worse than forced resignation will happen to Breuer, Cole, and Holder?
What is justice for those dozens who have already died, and the hundreds who will eventually be killed by these guns? What is justice for their families?
What punishment serves justice for those who broke their oaths of office, US and Mexican law, and cynically fed a death machine? What punishment serves, when their despicable motives were to advance their personal and political agendas?
The people responsible should be facing life in prison. I don't think that is very likely to happen.
Thanks for all the good work Bob.
Posted by: novaculus at July 08, 2011 12:13 PM (Evy6o)
Posted by: Angela at July 08, 2011 12:32 PM (KGLjK)
Admiral Ackbar would be very disappointed in you all for your comments.
Posted by: A Conservative Teacher at July 08, 2011 01:01 PM (5Npe5)
I had to look up "interdict" to make sure I had the correct meaning. First is the Christian definition, the forbidding of communion to miscreants. Second the Scots definition, a court order against further such action. Finally, the MILITARY definition: to destroy an enemy's lines of communication by firepower.
Which is exactly the point. Regardless of the "original" plan...under the current administration there was, and is, and will be NO "interdiction" of anyone.
No priest will tell the cartels not to expect to receive communion. No useful court orders will be issued against them. Most of all, there was NO destruction of an ememy's ability to continue to harm us.
On the contrary, they were given guns, very deadly guns, and it is yet to be determined if those guns were in fact paid for with US tax dollars...
And those guns were not only used in Mexico, but now it turns out they have been used, and are being used, by illegal immigrants in Arizona.
I repeat, Accessory to Murder Before the Fact. Which is a big time felony !
Posted by: Robert Hanson at July 09, 2011 01:02 AM (F5gEf)
Here's a statement that's equally obtuse,
"ice is cold"
Actual justice, moral justice may be served but don't count on it.
But the process political systemic justice can be said to have been served no matter the outcome, and that is crap
Posted by: rumcrook at July 09, 2011 04:23 PM (60WiD)
Posted by: emdfl at July 09, 2011 07:24 PM (pI25d)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0143 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0113 seconds, 22 records returned.
Page size 13 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.