Goin' Up Around the Bend
It's dead simple.
Anthony Weiner took a dick pic and wanted to send it to a young woman who is not his wife. Instead of hitting "D" (to direct and privately message) the young lady, he hit "@," posting his pecker to the world, or at least the 40,000 or so people that were following the congressman at the time. He realized his mistake and erased it quickly, but not quickly enough. He was caught, literally, with his pants down. From there, it has only gotten worse as the arrogant New Yorker has fanned the flames of scandal in one of the most disastrous political damage control campaigns in recent memory. It has now gotten so bad that Weiner has even been forced to admit that there are other pictures of his package.Taking his own words at face value, the only rational conclusion is that Weiner did exactly what he is accused of doing. And then there is something called a "Stranded Wind," which has created increasing more elaborate and fanciful conspiracy theories in an attempt to scapegoat conservatives for Weiner's transgressions. Stranded Wind's latest claim is that Andrew Brietbart is behind a nafarious scheme to frame Weiner in order to protect Supreme Court Justice from (left-wing) allegations of tax evasion for not complying with disclosure requirements on financial forms. Like significant players in Obama's cabinet, Thomas made amends when the discrepancy was pointed out. I'd note that this even less than it appears to be, Thomas merely failed to disclose his wife's source of income, he wasn't a tax cheat like, say, the Treasury Secretary. So how does a picture of a New York Congressman's erect member keep Clarence and Ginny Thomas out of jail for "corruption" in Stranded Wind's fantasy? It's like this:
"I have photographs. I don't know what photographs are out there in the world of me," he said in one cable news interview, asked whether he'd ever snapped a photo like that of himself. In another interview, Weiner acknowledged "it could be" the case that one of his private photos spilled onto the Internet.
- Breitbart frames Weiner with dick pic
- ?
- Thomas doesn't face charges for his non-crime
27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="437" height="370" id="viddler_1b2dbe7">
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 09:12 PM
Comments
1
I've been wondering who "charges" Thomas for this. Isn't impeachment by the house the first step? How does the lack of this enable impeachment?
Posted by: Phelps at June 03, 2011 12:58 AM (ACp4b)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0069 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0056 seconds, 9 records returned.
Page size 6 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.