Comfortably Dumb
David Neiwert at Crooks and Liars makes an asinine and snarky post this morning about the capture of Times Square bombing suspect Faisal Shahzad, writing:
Neiwert is either dumb as a post, or worse, assumes his readers are. The law enforcement approach to terrorism that conservatives disagree with concerns terrorist events and suspects outside of U.S. territory. Many liberal Democrats prefer to treat international terrorism as an international law enforcement matter, a laughable strategy considering the ideological (and occasional state) support many terrorists receive in the countries they use as their base of operations. The military approach—which, I hasten to add, has been largely adopted by the Obama Administration because it works—involves surveillance and military interdiction instead of arrest warrants. The Predator drones strikes inside Pakistan that have stepped up under Obama, and occasional raids in the Horn of Africa, are perfect examples of this in practice. I defy Neiwert to product anyone—former Vice President Dick Cheney included—who calls for military strikes on American soil against suspected terrorists. No, we trust our federal, state and local law enforcement officers to use their expertise to track down terrorists on American soil, and they did just that in this instance, and admirably well. Niewert is abusing a strawman. Worse, he's insulting the intelligence of his readers. Or at least I hope he is.
The next time you hear some right-winger (most notably Dick Cheney) sneer at the Obama administration's "law enforcement approach to terrorism," remember this.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 09:24 AM
Comments
Most seem to be educated beyond their intelligence. Any fool can bea journalist. It takes ability and talent to be a reporter. There are almost no reporters left and everybody with a pen and notebook IS a journalist.
Posted by: OdinsAcolyte at May 04, 2010 10:37 AM (brIiu)
Posted by: Timber at May 04, 2010 11:03 AM (MbyMv)
This one is easy to answer: it is none other than President Obama who has authorized the assassination of an American citizen wherever he might be found. Or does a CIA assassination not count as a "military strike"? From none other than Glenn Greenwald, last month:
"both The New York Times and The Washington Post confirm that the Obama White House has now expressly authorized the CIA to kill al-Alwaki no matter where he is found, no matter his distance from a battlefield."
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations
Posted by: d.eris at May 04, 2010 11:29 AM (/vHSl)
Posted by: Mike at May 04, 2010 11:36 AM (Ll70k)
Posted by: David at May 04, 2010 11:53 AM (dccG2)
Posted by: garrettc at May 04, 2010 01:53 PM (DQjJA)
He's a liberal / blogger / journalist / msnbc / hack anyway, so good lord, don't assign too much credibility to him.
And while we're at it, let's blame Bush for putting into place some of the mechanisms used to track down this failed bomber.
Posted by: jcrue at May 04, 2010 05:22 PM (7SOYO)
Posted by: Mike at May 05, 2010 07:59 AM (Mv/2X)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/25/us/25detain.html?_r=1&hp
Posted by: AndyS at May 05, 2010 04:51 PM (g1d9l)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0103 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0082 seconds, 17 records returned.
Page size 9 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.