Media Matters Irate That I Stated An Obvious Truth
Media Matters is furious that I dared challenge the farcical Democratic claim that health care is a "right." when I wrote on my Twitter account:
I proudly stand by that comment. A handful of elitists spoke on the House floor this evening, arrogantly insisting that it was our financial obligation (yours and mine) to pay for the medical care of others, and insisting it is their "right" to be provided medical care. It most certainty is not. According to Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi (who just so happened to be the Democrat speaking when I wrote that tweet, but was assuredly not the first), it is my obligation to pay for your "right." I will be forced to pay for coverage, whether I want it or not. I will be forced to pay for the coverage of others, whether I want it or not. I stand by my comment that the Democrats who crammed this unwarranted bill down the throats of the American people who clearly and overwhelmingly opposed it deserve to be drawn and quartered. As Wikipedia notes, having someone "laboring against that person's will to benefit another, under some form of coercion" is the very definition of involuntary servitude... slavery. We are Americans, and will be slaves to no man, no Congress, and no President.
the next one of these jackasses that calls #healthcare a "right" deserves to be drawn and quartered.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 11:14 PM
Comments
Posted by: Joe at March 21, 2010 11:44 PM (HSfpS)
Or am I missing something about the concept of health care as a "right"?
Posted by: Paul at March 21, 2010 11:50 PM (mYnJ6)
The right of free speech...You also have the right NOT to exercise your right of free speech if you'd like...
The right to assemble...You also have the right NOT to exercise your right to assemble if you'd like...
The right to bare arms...You also have the right NOT to exercise your right to bare arms if you'd like...
But he right to healthcare?...Doesn't pass the smell test...
You are FORCED BY LAW now to be part of the plan irrelevant of whether or not you wanted to exercise that ability...
Therefore, it is, unequivically, NOT a "right"...
cnredd
Political Wrinkles
http://politicalwrinkles.com
Posted by: cnredd at March 21, 2010 11:52 PM (XdXvF)
Posted by: Pablo at March 22, 2010 12:08 AM (yTndK)
Assertion is not proof, and there certainly is nothing to increase efficiency within the abomination of "reform" Congress just vomited on us.
I've never gotten an answer from any leftist why, if providing health insurance to the uninsured was so important to them, they never formed a charity to do it. Why they demand that other people be forced to pay for something they consider so important.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at March 22, 2010 06:03 AM (n2wxa)
Posted by: Just Sayin' at March 22, 2010 06:22 AM (XUpm+)
Posted by: Patriot at March 22, 2010 06:38 AM (+tzWQ)
These people(I dare not call them Americans) have along with their media arm, have attempted to hijack the notion health care is a right. While it sounds nice, it's not right. They of course have also attempted to shape this in moral terms too. As if people who support baby killing have any morals to start with.
Posted by: citizenofmanassas at March 22, 2010 07:06 AM (ps4OZ)
The thing about irrational love, is that when it is shown to be false, irrational hatred is the natural result.
Posted by: Tracy Coyle at March 22, 2010 07:28 AM (gorkw)
Why is that?
Posted by: salvage at March 22, 2010 08:11 AM (Gk2oj)
Posted by: Mark L at March 22, 2010 08:13 AM (AfORa)
Posted by: Boo at March 22, 2010 09:02 AM (ZyB29)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haight_Ashbury_Free_Clinics
And again, the proof is in the pudding as to whether we consider health care a right in this country. On the one hand, we the have the Hippocratic Oath, emergency room service mandated by means of the rules governing hospital incorporation, and next to zero public outcry for shutting down ERs.
On the other hand, we have you braying that 'health care is not a right!'
Posted by: D. Aristophanes at March 22, 2010 09:05 AM (a5QDq)
BTW, David Frum wrote a very good commentary yesterday, but Republicans are too scared to comment. I mean, I get that conservatives scare easily and are primarily motivated by irrational fears, but fear of David Frum...? C'mon, if that's the neocon spine, then it's no wonder the twin towers of our sacred War on Drugs and Terrorism are failing as woefully as the GOP's misguided Epic Fail War Against Health Care Reform.
Posted by: Billy Bob Tweed at March 22, 2010 09:09 AM (nqYRj)
Posted by: cargil at March 22, 2010 09:09 AM (7Jwc6)
Posted by: Troy Flowers at March 22, 2010 09:32 AM (a9gh4)
Never.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at March 22, 2010 09:47 AM (brIiu)
Posted by: Weasel's Ripped My Flesh at March 22, 2010 10:27 AM (nqYRj)
Posted by: Gary Ruppert at March 22, 2010 11:12 AM (U+fuL)
Let's have a list of the people you intend to shoot with your rifle! Perhaps to be posted on Twitter for all the world to see, that they may marvel at your martial virtue!
Posted by: Grondo at March 22, 2010 11:12 AM (h7KyL)
Posted by: benjoya at March 22, 2010 11:28 AM (vp+2w)
Posted by: benjoya at March 22, 2010 11:29 AM (vp+2w)
You cut the taxes on the wealthy because no one else payes taxes. Can you understand that concept? The small amount of money that you might pay to taxes is nothing. When you are writing 6 figures to the IRS, then you can have an opinion.
As to the one trillion debt, you are mistaken, the debt is about 12 trillion under Obama. Now it looks like your building up to a Bush moment, stop right now as most conservatives view Bush as a liberal. The only talent the man had was that he was not Gore or Kerry. Look what has happened as a consequence of voting for scum.
Posted by: David at March 22, 2010 11:45 AM (jHK8i)
i was forced to pay for a lot of things that i didn't want to pay for, like killing people in other countries, most of which were much less morally defensible than buying health insurance for poor children
quit yer whining and grow up!
Posted by: tacitus voltaire at March 22, 2010 12:29 PM (aor+S)
We must battle against these things. How dare elected officials in a representative democracy vote to MANDATE that insurance companies can't deny coverage to children because they have pre-existing conditions!! ANGER!!!
Posted by: Barry at March 22, 2010 02:02 PM (KTL7T)
So you're against ANY form of taxation that results in ANY redistribution of wealth? If I pay taxes that in any way benefit another person, I am being coerced?
This is why I don't take many conservative bloggers seriously. When you're equally willing to declare war on the federal government over corporate subsidies, all tariffs, all license fees, etc., I'll take you seriously.
And I get that your quote includes "against his will," but these bills were passed by majorities in both houses of Congress. If a tax is passed by a democratically elected majority, you consent. Otherwise, as many have noted already, I could easily object to my taxes being spent for things I don't approve of, and claim I didn't consent to be taxed for purposes I find obnoxious.
As someone much smarter than I am wrote, "Enlightenment is man's freeing himself from his own self-imposed chains." You complain that this bill deprives you of your freedom, but you cannot be free at all while you are still bound by the chains of your own self-imposed ignorance.
Posted by: Reginald Perrin at March 22, 2010 02:47 PM (uFBOs)
Wow, so only millionaires show be allowed to have a voice in the country. That sounds like a much better system than American democracy.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!
Posted by: Mysticdog at March 22, 2010 02:55 PM (qOcqb)
Semper Fi, Devo.
Posted by: Gramma Millie at March 22, 2010 03:04 PM (tB7Z3)
Yea, you got it. Our founders had a system in which you only voted if you had property. This whole process that we see show why. Are you aware that the Greeks, who developed democracy, gave it up as they felt it did not work? We live in a republic. We need to return to that concept. Currently 46% of the US is on the federal payrole, you feel that it is fair that they dictate to the 30% of us paying the bill as to how much we can take home and keep? I don't think so and I am getting mad enough to express my discontent.
Posted by: David at March 22, 2010 03:35 PM (jHK8i)
WINNER OF FIRST PRIZE FOR 'MOST IGNORANT POST IN THIS THREAD'!
congratulations! please accept your free cheeze!
Posted by: tacitus voltaire at March 22, 2010 05:10 PM (/KK3f)
I see the liberals are out. Name calling. Personal attacks. Try giving some facts. And make sure you don't distort like usual.
Posted by: David at March 22, 2010 05:30 PM (jHK8i)
Posted by: Puncheur at March 22, 2010 05:35 PM (dzkxB)
Posted by: Gary Ruppert at March 22, 2010 05:36 PM (YTlAZ)
1,774,000 Federal government civilian employees, excluding Post Office
615,000 Post Office
1,172,913 Military enlisted
230,577 Military Officers
2,424,000 State government (excluding education and hospitals)
5,594,000 Local government (excluding education and hospitals)
That's a total of 11,810,490 government jobs.
The total number of jobs in the U.S. in 2006 was 150,600,000, so government employment makes up 7.84% of all jobs.
In 2007, the U.S. population (according to the Census Bureau) was 301,621,157, so about 4% of Americans are employed by the government.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_americans_are_government_employed
"athenian democracy" is the name for the form of democracy practised in the small city states of greece in about the 4th century b.c., where all adult male free property holders would get together for votes on important issues. we can't gather all 225 million american adults for votes on every issue, so we have what is called "representative democracy", where we vote directly only for our representatives, who then vote for us. on the other hand, we have extended the vote to all citizens, and have no slaves, so our franchise is more inclusive than athenian democracy. so, you see, we do have democracy, which is a form of government where the people ('demos') are ultimately in charge ('-ocracy'). the united states is a democratic republic.
the democratic city states were ultimately taken over by dictators. it is not true that they voluntarily gave up democracy. you will note that the romans had a democratic form of government from about 496 b.c. to about 27 b.c., when augustus consolidated his one man rule and initiated what we call the imperial period of roman government. however, augustus deceitfully let the roman people believe that democratic government had not been done away with, although when tiberius took over for him after he died it became clear that roman democracy was dead. my 'cousin' p. cornelius tacitus wrote scornfully and vitriolically about the shameful state of roman public life under the emperors...
Posted by: tacitus voltaire at March 22, 2010 05:46 PM (/KK3f)
1.a.A political order whose head of state is not a monarch and in modern times is usually a president.
b.A nation that has such a political order.
c.A political order in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who are entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them.
d.A nation that has such a political order.
2.a.A political order in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who are entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them.
b.A nation that has such a political order.
DEMOCRACY (american heritage dictionary)
1.Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.
2.A political or social unit that has such a government.
3.The common people, considered as the primary source of political power.
4.Majority rule.
5.The principles of social equality and respect for the individual within a community.
Posted by: tacitus voltaire at March 22, 2010 05:54 PM (/KK3f)
Posted by: benjoya at March 22, 2010 06:55 PM (vp+2w)
Posted by: Lex at March 22, 2010 07:27 PM (4RUeB)
Posted by: inspectorudy at March 23, 2010 01:50 AM (Vo1wX)
if you had worked in a reinsurance company like i did you would know a little more about it. that isn't how insurance companies make most of their money
i bet you also think banks get rich on savings account fees
Posted by: tacitus voltaire at March 23, 2010 02:09 AM (aor+S)
the short and the long is that you right wingers would prefer to see your neighbours die in the gutter than pay for their children with asthma.
Posted by: yoyo at March 23, 2010 03:10 AM (uWFQc)
Posted by: KGE at March 23, 2010 05:35 AM (YwNA8)
Then I'd buy a nice lawnmower and go into landscaping. CASH ONLY.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at March 23, 2010 07:44 AM (R7LgM)
Never.
"My land" is your mom's basement, right?
Posted by: Tracy at March 23, 2010 09:19 AM (XzaKD)
Local taxpayers. In Palm Beach county FL, service providers are reimbursed by the taxpayers ~$160M/yr.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 23, 2010 09:52 AM (ItKkr)
losing everything you own because you happened to get sick is the height of tyranny. And passing a bill into law when you have been elected is not tyranny. It's called democracy.
Posted by: Growuprepubs at March 23, 2010 06:00 PM (0/zd5)
Posted by: KR at March 23, 2010 06:29 PM (sGtp+)
Posted by: Nine-of-Diamonds at March 24, 2010 10:01 AM (1fRyx)
Never. "
Riiiight. Try it. I dare you. Double dare. I might be a progressive but I am quite ready for you.
Posted by: CJ at March 24, 2010 01:29 PM (fJTqC)
Never. "
Hardee Har Har!
Bring it Odious!
Posted by: Stagger Lee at March 24, 2010 04:46 PM (cWuKN)
What is this - a middle school playground? Takes a real man to threaten other posters over the 'net.
Posted by: Nine-of-Diamonds at March 27, 2010 12:28 PM (Eg9Id)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0254 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0176 seconds, 58 records returned.
Page size 34 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.