Biden Blames Our System of Government For Failures of Liberal Ideology
Our government is the oldest continuously functioning in the world. Since the United States has been founded, France has gone through five Republics, Russia evolved from monarchy to communist state to its current iteration, and and every other nation on earth has watched it's form of government die, transform,or be reborn.
But according to Joe Biden, our form of government is broken:Biden is merely echoing a new talking point that liberal Democrats have issued in an attempt to explain away their failure to ram through unpopular legislation. According to the meme, it is the fault of our system of government that our socialist President and progressive Senate and House leaders have been unable to push through an economy-crippling cap-and-trade bill, a disasterous health care rationing bill, and a second costly, pork-laden attempt at stimulus. Democrats, trapped in a community-based reality, simply refuse to acknowledge the fact that the same failed radical leftist policies that they have attempted to ram through multiple times in the past fifty years. They are part of a bankrupt ideology that has never worked, no matter how many times it has been tried. But instead of admitting their own failures, Democrats arrogantly insisted these failures are the fault of the American people, or a problem of communication. They cannot admit that they belong to an intellectually stagnant movement devoid of new ideas. It is no wonder that they stand on the threshold of squandering their attempt to lead yet again.
In an interview with CBS "Early Show" co-anchor Harry Smith, Biden was blunt about the nation's political system. "Washington, right now, is broken." Having served in the Senate for more than 30 years, Biden has seen a fair share of gridlock in Congress, but the current version is the worst ever, he said. "I don't ever recall a time in my career where to get anything done, you needed a supermajority, 60 out of 100 senators. You can block anything with 60 (votes). "I've never seen it this dysfunctional," he said.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:12 PM
Comments
That which we were warned is "an emergency"..."can't wait"..."must be done now or it will never get done"...a year ago, languishes in the trash can on Capitol Hill. Democrats simply replaced it with more of the same, just with a different title. Stimulus failed miserably, so the next stimulus legislation gets the new name - "Jobs Bill", as though the fools think we don't recognize BS when we smell it.
About the only hope we have is maintaining a "HELL NO to everything" attitude and pray that three years goes by without having a George Soros coronation as King.
Posted by: Dell at February 17, 2010 01:07 PM (H/+W/)
That should surprise them.
I think you left out the word "Republic" there.
Posted by: SSG Jeff (USAR) at February 17, 2010 01:32 PM (zGCLY)
I love the Dems complaining about needing 60 votes to pass anything, since they're the ones who gave us the non-filibuster filibuster, i.e. invoking cloture on any and all Republican initiatives and appointees.
Posted by: Tim at February 17, 2010 02:41 PM (xq7pr)
Having said that, our system of government IS broken. It's just a matter of time before that truth is evident to all thinking people. The costs and the time associated with running a political campaign in the modern era has opened up our system to the corrupting influences of campaign contributions.
A politician simply cannot win an election, or even get on the ticket, without vast sums of money. As Senator Bayh has recently stated since his announcement that he won't seek another term in the Senate, both houses of Congress are in a constant campaign mode. There's no time for the people's business. It's all about raising money for the next election.
Furthermore, we are more divided as a nation than we have been since The American Civil War.
What's the solution? I don't know. I predict that within another decade or two we'll all know that the system itself needs to undergo radical transformation. In fact, it's doing so as we discuss this topic now. The America that so called conservatives long for and pine for is long gone. And, that America ain't coming back.
That isn't to say that what lies ahead is necessarily a bad thing, it's just different than the America of the past. We adapt or we fail. Simple as that.
Posted by: Dude at February 17, 2010 03:38 PM (5gxhz)
Half the power grab from the last 150 years will be stripped frm the Feds. God Speed that great day. It will be that or guns.
We will have our country back.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at February 17, 2010 04:08 PM (brIiu)
Posted by: Picric at February 17, 2010 04:14 PM (oKOn9)
Posted by: Robert at February 17, 2010 04:59 PM (IEh7K)
Posted by: Dude at February 17, 2010 05:52 PM (5gxhz)
Posted by: emdfl at February 17, 2010 07:18 PM (i8a3s)
Secondly - you seem to want to place all the blame on those "rascally republicans" - I guess you have selective memory of the disgusting partisanship and seditious comments for EIGHT years that George Bush and our military had to endure. I won't give you all the examples - you can explore them when you educate yourself on the 18th and 19th century partisanship.
Lastly, and I hope this doesn't offend you to much. My 50+ years of experience has led me to look at most liberals as either naive, ignorant or stupid. Two are fixable, one is permanent. Most libs have some of all three - I have "hope" that you can "change" and wake up to the real world and develope some common sense. I did - I once voted for George McGovern and twice for Jimmy Carter - I left my liberal FOG and started thinking FOR MYSELF and QUESTIONING everything that was being fed to my by a BIASED media - OH my GOD - there is that dirty word!!!!!
Posted by: mixitup at February 17, 2010 09:52 PM (Z21cb)
Another thing you may or may not have noticed. Obama says" We have saved or created millions of jobs, and averted a disaster that would have destroyed our economy"
With that reasoning, GWB averted a disaster by invading/rebuilding and bringing democracy to Iraq. He saved or protected millions of lives by not allowing AQ a place to hang out and a dictator to party with...You buy that? Didn't think so but that's exactly the type of reasoning YOUR guy expects us to buy....Funny how all that Bush bashing your crew did for over 5 years is coming back to bite you guys in the ass.
Posted by: Robert at February 17, 2010 10:04 PM (IEh7K)
Conservatives long for and pine for a strong national defense - living within our means - freedom - self reliance - taking care of those that are not capable. Dude, if that America is long gone, what lies ahead that you feel is not necessarily a bad thing?
Posted by: Rick at February 18, 2010 09:17 AM (GmIEI)
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at February 18, 2010 01:51 PM (brIiu)
Conservatives long for and pine for a strong national defense - living within our means - freedom - self reliance - taking care of those that are not capable. Dude, if that America is long gone, what lies ahead that you feel is not necessarily a bad thing?
strong national defense: Check, we have that.
living within our means: Unlikely to happen regardless of which party is in power. I've not been able to find any evidence that would suggest otherwise to me.
freedom: Check, we have that, at least more so than most other places that I know of. What sort of "freedom" do you long for and pine for that you don't currently have?
self reliance: Please define in more detail. Like freedom, that's a pretty broad term.
taking care of those that are not capable: We're on the same page on this one, Rick! Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond their control, more and more Americans are finding themselves in this condition. I'm not talking about lazy people, either. I'm talking about hard working citizens for whom the American Dream hasn't panned out too well. You know, our fellow Americans.
What isn't necessarily a bad thing for the future of America? A couple of examples that come to mind:
A single payer health care system that provides universal health care to ALL Americans.
More aspects of socialism that benefits the average citizen rather than the current type of socialism that we now have, which benefits a few at the expense of the population in general.
Posted by: Dude at February 19, 2010 03:10 PM (5gxhz)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0134 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0109 seconds, 22 records returned.
Page size 16 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.