Bayou Watergate
I guess every generation or so someone has to learn that trying to tap telephones for political gain rarely ends well.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 08:24 PM
Comments
Semantics? Perhaps, but it sets the record straight.
No matter what you call it, it's a mighty STUPID stunt that could cost them some time in a Federal pen.
Posted by: Dell at January 26, 2010 08:44 PM (EFDI0)
Posted by: ECM at January 26, 2010 10:33 PM (nYKDd)
The boy got him a big head and it bit him in the arse. The reason it isnt a tap charge is they got caught before getting it done.
Posted by: JP at January 27, 2010 01:54 AM (VxiFL)
Not to say that if O'Keefe was trying to what he is alleged to have done that he should not be prosecuted.
Just kind of makes me think what exactly she has to hide. Her Homeland Security committees are concerned with disaster relief, not counterintelligence or actual security. I sure as hell think that the corruption related people at federal law enforcement should be listening in on all these phones. Probable cause? They're politicians and there isn't a clean one in the business.
What if they had pulled off and gotten some absolutely damming recordings? Something truly game changing, something exposing some kind of deep corruption? The goal is not to try the worthless bastards, the goal is to shame them, to show the world how corrupt they are.
He who will not risk, will not win. Mr. O'Keefe, you bit off more then you could chew. Like Nathan Hale, you will pay the price for getting caught. Such is the nature of what you do. Good luck to you, and may sneakier people pick up the torch and discover the deadliest weapon in the world: information. For the truth stands on it's own, and roaches will always scurry when you flick the kitchen light on.
Posted by: Britt at January 27, 2010 02:06 AM (DcWbe)
Regardless of what you think, they have not been charged with wiretapping, so all these stories floating around the web pretending this is Watergate The Sequel are the usual media garbage. And lot's of normally sensible right-wing sites are falling for it.
The reason it isnt a tap charge is they got caught before getting it done.
Attempting to wire tap a phone is still a crime. It's not a crime they were charged with though.
Posted by: flenser at January 27, 2010 10:43 AM (ilqdP)
jp says stick to the tap story.... why? there is no proof being offered of that. instead all ive seen so far is hysteria and innuendo.
Posted by: rumcrook™ at January 27, 2010 11:23 AM (60WiD)
Posted by: David at January 27, 2010 11:36 AM (dccG2)
Idiot. And now the slime at Acorn and elsewhere are baying that this idiotic act somehow excuses their facilitating child prostitution and tax evasion.
Posted by: iconoclast at January 27, 2010 02:07 PM (zKViF)
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/200687.php
Posted by: Russ at January 27, 2010 03:14 PM (HKz3Z)
I am starting to worry about you.
Posted by: Doom at January 27, 2010 03:45 PM (mvCvZ)
and in the end thats all they have tresspass, and possibly somnething to do with misrepresenting who you are to gain access. none of which rises to a federal level.
Posted by: rumcrook™ at January 27, 2010 04:01 PM (60WiD)
Posted by: TimothyJ at January 27, 2010 04:23 PM (IKKIf)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.013 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.011 seconds, 20 records returned.
Page size 9 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.