So... Sully Isn't Sully?

Apparently, Andrew Sullivan's blog isn't solely his work, and turns out to have been a group blog largely ghost-written by two other people.

I'm not sure if I find any solace at all in discovering that his logical inconsistencies and bizarre fixations are instead part of a group psychosis.

How about you?

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:58 AM

Comments

1 Stopped reading him ages ago. Not worth my time.

Posted by: garrettc at December 15, 2009 11:14 AM (DQjJA)

2 Well, there's strength in numbers, after all. I'm sure with such a strong delusion he must pay people to tell him he's being reasonable and misunderstood.

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at December 15, 2009 11:41 AM (aBEdy)

3 A totally irrelevant writer and he has been for many moons. Haven't bothered with his diatribe in as long. Not surprised it's a "circle jerk" sort of blog. I am surprised he has friends.

Posted by: Dell at December 15, 2009 12:00 PM (9e3Rq)

4 Will the discovery cause bloggers (e.g.present company) from trying to drive traffic to her?

On the other hand, my list of "must read" blogs is a lot shorter than it used to be. (used to be that I had to read quite a few to get the big picture. Now, I read one and find out what all the rest have written about.

Sad,really.

Posted by: Larry Sheldon at December 15, 2009 12:24 PM (OmeRL)

5 It's all good, he stewed in his juices. And Andy gave himself a B+.

Posted by: brando at December 15, 2009 12:38 PM (IPGju)

6 Oh, I could tell when it wasn't Sullivan. No one can write the self-congratulatory, narcissistic drool than Andrew Sullivan writes.

What bothers me is that he gets PAID for that junk.

Posted by: Old Rebel at December 15, 2009 03:14 PM (eTIZJ)

7 Damn, I less conservative blog to read.

Tarheel Repub Out!

Posted by: Tarheel Repub at December 15, 2009 03:36 PM (prDeJ)

8 I doubt that "Excitable Andy" really exists at all. I haven't ever seen his birth certificate.

Posted by: Neo at December 15, 2009 04:54 PM (tE8FB)

9 It's Andy's Menage a Trois Blog.

Posted by: zhombre at December 15, 2009 10:01 PM (8mdQg)

10 Wasn't this guy's claim to relevance always that he was the most trafficked one "man" op in the 'verse? That and being a gay "conservative". Looks like, as with all these moronic hoaxes that pervade our politics and media it was based on Big Lie Theory. I don't think even Goebbels would have thought it wise to base so much on BLT though. As we see, when it falls it all falls at once.

Posted by: megapotamus at December 16, 2009 07:58 AM (LWhHe)

11 With Andy, two things were always in the forefront: 1) he was HUGE on gay marriage---putting that issue above all others, even the GWOT; and, 2) it was always apparent his(their?)judgment on individuals was consistently clouded by whether he/they would love to have sex with the individaul they were analyzing! The drooling over the prospect of fellating BHO was palpable!

I stopped reading his/their blog when those two "items" began to predominate serious discussions.

Posted by: Earl T at December 16, 2009 10:22 AM (uokdN)

12 How gobsmackingly vile that you bring this up

Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at December 16, 2009 04:53 PM (MxQFN)






Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0096 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0082 seconds, 20 records returned.
Page size 7 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.