Sadly Necessary
A re-linking of Popular Mechanics' Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report.
Because sadly, Van Jones isn't the only left-wing idiot that signed that infamous petition, and most of his peers are still convinced the Bush Administration let 9/11 happen.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:51 PM
Comments
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 11, 2009 12:54 PM (OX5qU)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 11, 2009 01:07 PM (gAi9Z)
I'll file that in the memory banks. You're not a good person.
Posted by: brando at September 11, 2009 01:42 PM (IPGju)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 11, 2009 06:09 PM (OX5qU)
Posted by: Marc at September 11, 2009 06:12 PM (Zoziv)
Who is this "his"? Did you bother to read the post before depositiong your little nuggets all over the place?
Posted by: Steve at September 11, 2009 07:59 PM (OQW4n)
Posted by: zhombre at September 11, 2009 08:42 PM (zzL++)
Posted by: brando at September 11, 2009 10:15 PM (LjEkE)
Posted by: Pennypacker at September 11, 2009 10:47 PM (tTXmT)
Are you reading the article which says that "high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur"?
Posted by: Steve at September 12, 2009 12:29 AM (BvEhq)
Posted by: brando at September 12, 2009 11:48 AM (LjEkE)
Since when did Salon permit Glenn Beck and the almost equally loony WSJ editorial page to set the terms of discussion, calling those who want answers to so much that remains unexplained about 9/11 "truthers" and thus giving them equivalence with "birthers," "deathers" and "tea baggers"?
Or this one:
The petition, as I signed it, was essentially recommending that an independent investigation take place. I felt at the time, and still feel, that with events of such monumental importance as this, the more light that can be shed the better. I do not believe that the official 9/11 Commission Report addressed many of the most important questions about the events. Nevertheless, I have no ongoing association with the 9/11 Truthers.
Or this:
First of all, the statement asks for a new inquiry into 9/11. That is hardly an insane demand, considering the many obstacles and limitations that prevented the 9/11 Commission from doing a proper job. That body was deliberately enfeebled by Bush/Cheney: grossly underfunded ($3 million -- while, for example, the budget for the study of the Challenger disaster was $50 million, and Whitewater cost over $40 million); granted no subpoena power; forced to rush the process; denied all sorts of vital information; and otherwise slowed down, fouled up, kept in the dark. (I write at length about Bush/Cheney's varied efforts to prevent, then hobble, the Commission in my book "Cruel and Unusual," pp. 33ff.)
These aren't people alleging that Bush had any foreknowledge of the terrorist plan. These are people who thought the 9/11 Commission did a poor job.
Posted by: Pennypacker at September 12, 2009 05:51 PM (tTXmT)
Posted by: brando at September 13, 2009 01:54 PM (LjEkE)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0091 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0071 seconds, 21 records returned.
Page size 10 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.