A Tale of Two Guns At Obama's Town Hall
A protester on private property well outside the security perimeter established for Barack Obama's town hall meeting yesterday carried a pistol in an exposed "tactical" thigh rig hours before the President arrived in New Hampshire. He got quite a bit of attention for his rather foolish effort.
There was absolutely nothing illegal about his actions, much to the consternation of the media, but it was still a pointless bit of provocation. In addition to being armed, he was holding a sign that said "It's time to water the tree of Liberty," an obvious reference to the famous Thomas Jefferson quote, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."So who and what is William Kostric? The sign itself provides the first clue about what kind of person Kostric is and who he associates with, with the URL to restoretherepublic.com printed prominently at the bottom. The site clearly identifies itself as part of the fringe "free state" movement, and actively promotes various conspiracy theories... and of course, Ron Paul. A left-wing blog claims to have found his MySpace page, and it appears to confirm that Kostric is—well,—what most of us would call nuts. All that aside, like Gaius, I'm curious...

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:33 PM
Comments
Posted by: David at August 12, 2009 01:56 PM (B9QvW)
Posted by: pacific_waters at August 12, 2009 02:05 PM (jettP)
He had a pocket knife in the building, right? Does that give a strong case of probable cause to search his vehicle - which it would seem he was far away from at the time???
If he were strapped with bombs about his person, OK. If he was smuggling in an AK-47, OK.
Even if he were arrested for having the pocket knife, OK --- once you are arrested, processing your vehicle is routine: they don't just leave the vehicle at the scene, and since they are in effect taking it into custody, they will inventory the contents as a matter of record keeping at least. Whatever they find illegal as they go through its contents is fair game in court.
But, searching his car without arresting him for having a pocket knife? I don't know about that one....I'd think a good lawyer in a liberal-friendly court might get that one tossed...
Posted by: usinkorea at August 12, 2009 02:09 PM (gf7Fp)
Yours is exactly the attitude that allowed a Marxist celebrity to become the president.
You insinuate that words on a sign and the fact that he had a gun indicate that he favors killing the leaders of our government in some maniacal coup. The quotation his sign refers to warns us simply that if we want to retain the liberties we've been given, we must be willing to fight for them.
Posted by: jq2122 at August 12, 2009 02:16 PM (SVZnQ)
The man may be a nut but he had every right to be there with the sign he was carrying.
I truly believe that one day the people will have to rise up and take their government back or they will lose all the freedoms guaranteed by God and our founders. It may not be in my lifetime but it will happen.
Posted by: TNHunter at August 12, 2009 03:12 PM (zSsxP)
The purpose is not to "provoke an emotional response." This is the act of a bully, the act of one who is not interested in participation, regardless of whatever civic duty calls them to do so.
The purpose is to convince your fellow citizens the justness of your cause, and gather support.
But it appears you would rather do it at gunpoint.
Posted by: James at August 12, 2009 03:36 PM (gS7nN)
Posted by: Steve at August 12, 2009 04:25 PM (yOpUh)
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at August 12, 2009 04:33 PM (oC8nQ)
Stick to the Consititution for enlightenment fellow Americans. Yes We Can
Posted by: Chuck at August 12, 2009 04:35 PM (T3Lqh)
Posted by: David at August 12, 2009 05:35 PM (JlB2o)
The reason he was searched inside the High School is that he supposedly entered the building without going through "security".
If he gave permission to have his truck searched is not stated in any news article. The local Sheriff recommended that he be released on his own recognizance.
One of his employees stated that he is just forgetful and made a mistake.
RE: Pistol Packing Patriot. He most likely had to buy another ear piece for his [whatever] because the one that came with it was a piece of crap and had to be replaced with a good one.
He was on private property with permission from the owners [a Church]. Did he want to make a statement? Evidently he is an "Open Carry" advocate, and there are thousands of them. They intend to make the public aware of their rights by demonstrating those rights. This is nothing new to many that live in states that allow open carry. In some states the weapon must be unloaded, and the authorities have the right to ask to verify that it is unloaded. But other than that, there is no problems with open carry in those states. Other states the pistol does not have to be unloaded, in some the pistol has to be registered or licensed.
It can be very confusing. Always know your state law and local laws. Some cities have their own rules and regs.
I know a few Ron Paul supporters and none of them are nuts or dangerous unless you screw with them.
Where I live it is not uncommon to see guns on people or in their vehicles. But be aware there are many more that you don't see, because they have concealed carry permits and yes that includes many, many women.
We take our rights seriously around here, but that doesn't make us radicals, it just makes us Texans.
And needless to say, we are proud of it.
Papa Ray
West Texas
Posted by: Papa Ray at August 12, 2009 07:54 PM (JpVJn)
Most of you seem to have forgotten Michelle's comment about the ear piece. It doesn't look like any ear piece for a MP3 player. It looks like something a Secret Service person would wear. I think it is a very good question like who is on the other end of Obamas Blackberry. Who else was on the earpiece? Friend of foe? Was this a set up? He seems the type that could easily be duped into a provocative act by others.
Posted by: Calvin at August 12, 2009 08:52 PM (f1SnB)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at August 13, 2009 12:55 AM (bhNGz)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at August 13, 2009 12:58 AM (bhNGz)
I'm about as mad as I can get with the how the media and leading Dems are demonizing the protesters, and I'm not against gun rights, but the guy was ignorant for doing what he did. He'll do more to harm his cause than help it.
As for the sign, he was clearly hinting at the need to wet some people to defend democracy every once in awhile, and since he brought and displayed the tool to carry out such an action, the Secret Service would have been brain dead not to respond to the guy.
We're not talking about an everyday situation here - regardless of who the president is and how much I disagree with him.
Posted by: usinkorea at August 13, 2009 02:39 AM (7VLo4)
Posted by James at August 12, 2009 03:36 PM
The gun was pointed at mother Earth-duh.
Posted by: Pinandpuller at August 13, 2009 06:17 AM (aRm4V)
I also thought that public nudity is not against the law there.
Posted by: Pinandpuller at August 13, 2009 06:20 AM (aRm4V)
I'm sure the former were a lot more worried about the ones they couldn't see.
Considering how the past two Dem presidents treated their SS it's a wonder anyone wants to sign up to be a meat shield.
Posted by: Pinandpuller at August 13, 2009 06:29 AM (aRm4V)
Posted by: Larry at August 13, 2009 11:00 AM (v9zij)
Not quite - After Obama won the Democratic nomination, some of the Clinton supporters outlined how he got there -the caucuses turned into "Get-in-their-faces" (Where have we heard this before) confrontations. You know - union intimidation tactics but directed at any caucus Dems not backing Obama.
Posted by: davod at August 13, 2009 11:32 AM (GUZAT)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at August 13, 2009 06:20 PM (OX5qU)
Do not assume that because your question is both logical and reasonable that the answer will be either, much less both.
Crazy is as crazy does and it is as likely that his earpiece was in contact with extraterrestrials as with any other potential co-conspirator(s).
Posted by: ThomasD at August 13, 2009 09:27 PM (jVrU7)
To do otherwise is tantamount to treason - for example, you may exercise your 'right to life' as granted in the Constitution, as much as you want. But to do so and then try on some religion, public speech, privacy, or self-protection - you are TOAST.
Posted by: Druid at August 13, 2009 11:26 PM (Gct7d)
NH's motto is "Live free or Die" and we still to some degree live by that.
Open carry is legal,
you need a permit for concealed,
you don't need to register handguns.
But this is New England not the Keys, so no public nudity.
Posted by: Bill in NH at August 16, 2009 05:57 PM (MFQJZ)
Posted by: TexasCowboy at August 18, 2009 04:50 PM (uDanc)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0224 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0178 seconds, 33 records returned.
Page size 21 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.