Is Henry Gates A Crook?
Dan Riehl discovered a possible reason why Harvard professor Henry Gates famously acted like such a arrogant jerk when approached by a police officer investigating a breaking and entering call last week.
Gates has been running an charity that seems to bank most of its donations, and may have thought the cops were coming to arrest him for that. It's too soon to know for sure if Gates has done anything illegal with the funds that his charity hasn't properly accounted for, but I was Gates, I wouldn't worry. If Obama Justice Department will cover for the New Black Panthers, I'm sure they'll cover for a personal friend, even if he acted "stupidly."
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 08:57 AM
Comments
Posted by: Wolfman George at July 25, 2009 10:39 AM (R99J5)
Posted by: Steve R. at July 25, 2009 11:34 AM (XRiu8)
So he pursued the cop out of the house and harangued him until the officer had no choice but to arrest him.
Watch for Gates' mug shot to be on the book cover. Just as Rodney Kings parlayed a career as two bit street crook into civil rights icon, so has Gates parlayed a career as a two bit Harvard prima donna (a far less reputable and honest line of work) into - what? We haven't seen the end of it. Appearances on Oprah and The View, Larry King, fawning from Chris Mathews and Keith Olbermann, public invitations to the White House, standing ovations at Lincoln Center - Gates has made himself into the pretentious lefty's Mick Jagger.
In the meantime, Sgt, Crowley can expect the Joe the Plumber treatment.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at July 25, 2009 01:56 PM (Vcyz0)
Posted by: chris at July 25, 2009 02:55 PM (8UgjA)
It's the charities choice about who to give the money to as long as it's within the charities mission. In this case research on African American issues. The charity couldn't give away the $ to support a hospital since that's not part of what the charity was set up to do. Giving $10k to his assistant is a little shaky but if it was separate research down outside of the scope of her job (probably paid for by Harvard)there isn't a problem with that either.
I doubt he could use it to pay for a trip to China to research Yo Yo Ma's genology. I forget where I saw that claim this morning. It wouldn't fit within the parameters of what the charity was set up to do.
As for late filing of paperwork again that's all to common with small private family charities. Go to Guidestar.org and look at any number of them.
Posted by: Airedale at July 25, 2009 03:30 PM (3V4HI)
I'm a Libertarian and the fact that a born and raised American citizen was taken from his own home in hand cuffs and arrested for disorderly conduct, disorderly conduct in his OWN HOME is the most blatant violation of our Constitution imaginable. I don't care what color his skin is, it's a socialist police state when an American citizen is not able to be free in his own home. A man's home is his castle. Last I checked, disorderly conduct was permitted in a man's home as long as it did not effect another man's home or another's peaceful existence within his own home. Wasn't there just a series of tea parties to protest this sort of behavior?
Posted by: Syntax at July 25, 2009 05:35 PM (OX5qU)
Gates wasn't arrested because he was disorderly in his home. It was his behavior outside the home that got him arrested. Really, the arrest report is ready available. Is there some reason you feel compelled to post prior to reading the arrest report?
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/Police%20report%20on%20Gates%20arrest.PDF
Please, read it before posting any further nonsense. You're sounding an awful lot like BO.
Posted by: Lisa at July 25, 2009 05:59 PM (g0WRk)
POLICEMAN: Please show me your I.D., sir.
GATES: DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I'M MOE GREEN! I MADE MY BONES WHEN YOU WERE GOING OUT WITH CHEERLEADERS!
Posted by: MarkJ at July 25, 2009 06:31 PM (FZ1EI)
What's next? You can be arrested for disorderly conduct in your own home for having a dissenting point of view from government? You can be arrested for disorderly conduct in your own home for wearing a tee-shirt calling the President a Socialist or Nazi? You can be arrested for disorderly conduct in your own home for having hand guns or rifles? You can be arrested for disorderly conduct in your own home for posting a blog like this one? Are we the Soviet Union here? If Gates was a white guy and Obama didn't throw his two cents in on this, you'd be throwing a tea party on this guy's front yard screaming "Socialism"! Not saying your racists, just hypocrites. It's times like these that separate the TRUE Americans from the Conservative mouth pieces.
Posted by: Syntax at July 26, 2009 12:40 AM (bhNGz)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at July 26, 2009 08:26 AM (MxQFN)
Unless a law enforcement agent has a warrant signed and dated by a judge, it's my Constitutional right as an American citizen to tell that law enforcement agent to "get the f**k of my property!" Constitutional right! Not disorderly conduct! Maybe Communist Infidel is a more appropriate name for you.
Posted by: Syntax at July 26, 2009 08:51 AM (OX5qU)
Posted by: Syntax at July 26, 2009 08:56 AM (OX5qU)
Posted by: DoorHold at July 26, 2009 10:54 AM (I9qGK)
Posted by: scituate_tgr at July 26, 2009 04:25 PM (CnAVc)
You're Socialists!
Posted by: Syntax at July 26, 2009 07:34 PM (OX5qU)
you aren't a very good moby. I think even a paulbot has more sense than you are displaying.
Posted by: iconoclast at July 27, 2009 02:15 AM (O8ebz)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at July 27, 2009 07:33 AM (MxQFN)
Am I the only one having the hairs on the back of his neck stand up while reading this????
This is what Harvard is supporting these days?
Damnnnnnnn
Posted by: usinkorea at July 27, 2009 06:42 PM (qD510)
The common charities you mention whose core strategy is to hand out money through interest would have to have very large account. There is no way Gates' charity, with the money it has, could function as a charity based on bank or investment interest...
Everybody,
Syntax is displaying the ignorance of the law and common police procedures I'm seeing at other sites, and the information to recognize it as crap isn't hard to come by. Just watching the show Cops for awhile should educate you on the basics of law and practice.
Look up "probable cause" then explain to me how it is "unconstitutional" - which it must be - considering how the left is trying to work this Gates fiasco.
If you are stopped at the scene of a possible crime, you do not have the "right" to go berserk just because it is your property.
You also do not have the right to refuse to answer basic questions or offer an idea.
The police dispatch gives the police officer who arrives on the scene the probable cause to investigate if a crime has taken place or not.
If a person on the scene refuses to give a name or ID or explain why he/she is on the scene, the police are within their rights to hold that person until they can figure out who he/she is, whether a crime has been committed, and whether or not the person might be connected to a crime.
You don't even have to give the person a reading of Miranda rights if all you are asking are basic, common sense questions: What's your name? Do you have an ID on you? What are you doing here?
If you go berserk screaming about your rights and a citizen and property owner and refuse to answer these basic questions, there is a good chance you'll wind up cuffed, and if that will not calm you down, you've got a good chance of being charged with obstruction of justice or disorderly conduct or the likes.
The left's stuff about how the prof was inside his home or on his property is crap...
Posted by: usinkorea at July 27, 2009 09:09 PM (P/FFh)
Don't ever wind up in court then. Such distinctions are a huge deal in the law.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 27, 2009 10:41 PM (1rv3b)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.013 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0091 seconds, 28 records returned.
Page size 18 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.