An Ideologue's World
The flash was blinding and disorienting, and Hassan dropped to his knees as a roar like the end of the world shook the ground under him. The sky over Jericho dimmed and he turned west to see a mushroom cloud rising above Tel Aviv... or where Tel Aviv once was. A song began to rise in his heart at the death of the Jews, but it hung as he saw the contrails of high-flying Israeli jets streaking overhead toward Damascus and Tehran. "The Shia have killed us all," he whispered, and he sat down to die.
For now, this vision of the end of the Cradle of Civilization— the realization of the so-called Samson option by a dying Israel in response to an Iranian nuclear strike —is fiction. Our President, however, seems unwilling to take repeated Iranian threats to destroy Israel at face value, just as he ignores that nation's continued development of long-range missiles and nuclear warheads. He pretends to believe that Iran has a need or desire for peaceful nuclear energy instead of the beginning of Armageddon. His is a childish belief of a man who has never been a leader but has always been an ideologue in a political movement cowed by an irrational and suicidal belief of moral equivalence between good and evil when it admits that they even exist at all. He says we cannot impose our values—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—on nations with murderous histories and hate-consumed cultures. Better to let them live out their fantasies of genocide, no matter how many millions die, than be a man who has to make difficult decisions.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 02:57 PM
Comments
Posted by: George Bruce at June 02, 2009 03:37 PM (v4XVE)
If anyone knows how to stop Iran from building a bomb short of all out war please speak up. Failing that perhaps you could point to another 200-300,000 troops we could use for an invasion.
Once you show the world the US is a rouge state committed to "preventative war" - but only against non-nuclear armed nations - you all but insure everyone who can build a nuke will build a nuke. File this under sowing and reaping, and send the bill to Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: Jim at June 02, 2009 04:02 PM (3GzXA)
The Nork's proliferation can be blamed on Clinton before Bush, and Bush was, in regards to Iran, trying to take all peaceable steps possible to keep from having to launch an offensive against the Iranians weapons program.
Obama, an appeaser to the core, not only has failed to support our ally, but now has given legitimacy to an enemy that has clearly stated it's desire for the genocide of Israel multiple times. He's effectively given the go-ahead for an Arab race for the bomb.
And Jim has the gall to defend this modern day Chamberlain for making the world a far more dangerous place.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at June 02, 2009 04:20 PM (gAi9Z)
As for Jim: "the US is a rouge state..." Well that explains a lot. Clearly we should be a mascara and blusher state, rather than rouge. At least we're not a pancake make-up state.
Posted by: Stoutcat at June 02, 2009 04:28 PM (kKdtK)
Huffing and puffing does not equal "all possible peaceful steps", nor did it work. The question remains, what should Obama do short of war with Iran, and how could we pull that off when we're still in the middle of the Bush adventure in Iraq.
But why bother yourself with solutions, just keep calling our President names.
Posted by: Jim at June 02, 2009 04:33 PM (3GzXA)
Unfortunately, thanks to Jim's ilk, we can't even take that low-key option because they've created a litmus test for pre-emptive action that requires tens of thousands of dead Americans in order for them to feel morally justified in eliminating the threat.
Posted by: ECM at June 02, 2009 04:41 PM (q3V+C)
Posted by: jerry at June 02, 2009 05:06 PM (I03Iv)
Posted by: david at June 02, 2009 05:11 PM (dccG2)
Posted by: Adriane at June 02, 2009 08:07 PM (W7nzI)
It's a prescription for life-long mental difficulties. One cannot indefinitely define themselves as the opposite of another. While it has a comforting simplicity by its removal of responsibility, it leads to antagonism, radicalism, hatred and eventual unpleasant ends. As things never improve for those who apply the belief system, they increasingly attribute fault to their opposite to which they're linked. It's for this very reason that so many on the left now are not only not overjoyed at Obama's ascent, but are even more angry. They had expected that the demise of their opposite would naturally cause a rise of their own, but it doesn't work that way.
Jim's unfortunately destined to live a miserable life. He has given up on the capacity to contribute anything meaningful to this life. Say a prayer for him as you ignore him. The meaning of his life story is but to serve as a warning to the rest of us: use this life well. It may be all you have.
Posted by: HatlessHessian at June 03, 2009 12:22 AM (7r7wy)
CY is referring to Clinton providing huge amounts of grain, fuel oil and nuclear reactors to North Korea in the mid 90s. North Korea promised not to make nukes in exchange. They lied.
Everyone knew they were lying too. It seemed at the time that Clinton's purpose was to actively start their nuke program.
CY's not blaming Clinton for what you call the "last 8 years". The mid 90's were more than 8 years ago.
I'll give you a chance to come clean though.
I don't know how to break it down any more without making it sound like I'm talking to a small child, but I'll risk that so you can't squirm out of your claim.
Clinton was President in 1994. Not George Bush. You are dead wrong. 1994 was 15 years ago. Not 0-8 years ago.
The ball's in your court. Start begging for redemption, if you want it.
Posted by: brando at June 03, 2009 12:31 AM (j/VXB)
Posted by: jurde-Ak2 at June 08, 2009 10:57 PM (6xZR+)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0166 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0133 seconds, 20 records returned.
Page size 14 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.