CNN Digs In On Israeli Airstrike Fraud
CNN is insisting that the story it aired of a Palestinian videographer filming his younger brothers death is entirely legitimate:
This is CNN's evidence? Martin is the co-owner of the news company that employees the videographer; he has an intense vested interest in maintaining the credibility and reputation of his company and employees at all costs. And precisely what kind of news World News & Features produce [h/t Snapped Shot]?
There's no truth to accusations by bloggers that a Palestinian camera crew staged a video showing the death of the videographer's brother after an Israeli rocket attack, said the team's employer. "It's absolute nonsense," Paul Martin, co-owner of World News and Features, said of accusations leveled by bloggers at videographer Ashraf Mashharawi. "He's a man of enormous integrity and would never get involved with any sort of manipulation of images, let alone when the person dying is his own brother," Martin said. "I know the whole family. I know them very well. ... [Mashharawi] is upset and angry that anyone would think of him having done anything like this. ... This is ridiculous. He's independent." Raafat Hamdouna, administrative director at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, said Friday that "Mahmoud Khalil Mashharawi, a 12-year-old, was brought to the hospital, and he was breathing, but he was hit in the head and all over his body by shrapnel. He died later in the hospital. He was treated by the Norwegian team. When he was brought in, he was breathing. The team did their best to save him. I am not really sure if they even tried to rush him to the surgery room, because he was badly hurt."
Premium clients can commission the writing filming, and broadcast of specific stories. Commissioned news, sold at a premium. Isn't that another name for mercenary propaganda? If so, I wonder who commissioned these... or if they were done pro bono. HAMAS ALLIES PREPARE FOR RENEWED CONFLICT
WORLD NEWS & FEATURES is a unique specialist news and features provider, in the print, audio and video media, specialising in CONFLICT ZONES.
It specialises in high-quality and impeccably-researched content.
It only provides the material to non-competing clients. Under its unique system, each PREMIER CLIENT can brand the material as "From Our Own Correspondent" or "From ABC - Special to ..." or some other agreed wording.
A PREMIER CLIENT can also commission the writing, filming or broadcast of specific stories relevant to that clients region, city or specialised interest.
ROCKET MEN OF GAZA DYING TO SMASH ISRAEL WALL SAYS HAMAS RESIST, SAYS HAMAS ARMED WING Martin is trusted by Hamas on at least a professional level, and has a financial stake in the credibility of his employee's story. Neither of these conflicts of interest were disclosed by CNN, for the rather obvious reasons it undermines their claim of the story's credibility. And then there is the apparent discrepancy between the injuries claimed by hospital adminstrator Raafat Hamdouna and the lack of evidence of such wounds in the video footage. Hamdouna claimed:
The video shot by Ashraf Mashharawi does not seem to support this claim. While a frame-by-frame analysis shows a possible gash on the lower leg and what may be evidence of blood localized on the lower trunk, there is no evidence of any wound to the head or upper body.
"Mahmoud Khalil Mashharawi, a 12-year-old, was brought to the hospital, and he was breathing, but he was hit in the head and all over his body by shrapnel."

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:09 PM
Comments
I also doubt the "missile" argument as the damage does not look very extensive.
Posted by: Harold Morris at January 09, 2009 11:24 PM (q4Mt4)
THEY LIED FOR SADDAM.
AND DID THE SAME BS RE: AL DURA AND JENINGRAD AND THE LEBANON WAR.
THEY'RE NOT OBJECTIVE; THEY'RE ON THE OTHER SIDE.
Posted by: reliapundit at January 09, 2009 11:37 PM (Hhqr7)
these types of massacres have been happing for the past 14 days, look at the UN School that was blown and all the children that died, and no evidence has been put forward that missiles or any terrorist where in the area, it the UN for Gods Sake and they blew it up. IDF did the same to a UN Shelter in Lebanon, Remember Qana, Lebanon, and nothing was done nor was it condemned. It was just an "unfortunate incident"
Posted by: Simon at January 09, 2009 11:57 PM (GJzC1)
Yes. Because they've done it quite a few times before.
"look at the UN School that was blown and all the children that died, and no evidence has been put forward that missiles or any terrorist where in the area"
You really should pay better attention. The AP cited witnesses who saw Hamas thugs in the area; I believe the report was they fired one of the unguided rockets they're so fond of.
And, yes, "unfortunate incidents" happen. Particularly when a military that attempts to avoid civilian casualties is forced to fight thugs who benefit from civilian casualties whether they're Israeli, Lebanese, Palestinian, Egyptian, or Jordanian. The thugs fire from behind women and children -- it's the fault of the thugs that the women and children are caught in the crossfire.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at January 10, 2009 12:09 AM (Bpq+O)
Posted by: Tupac at January 10, 2009 12:15 AM (Tqe7s)
do you really think anyone in Gaza has the time and reason to make up and fake a death of a child. Its not like thats the only child reported to have been killed.
Absolutely they have the time, reason and motivation.
Sadly, civilians are always killed in wars and children are among those civilians. I readily concede those dozens of people under the age of 18 must have died in this current conflict, despite the best efforts of the IDF to limit themselves to legitimate military targets (Hamas has no such limitations, and in fact triggered this war by targeting civilians).
But dead children, however sad, are not motivating enough without context. there have been dozens of grisly wire service photos of dead children that sell well in the Arab and Muslim press to gin up outrage against Israel, but those photos are not as frequently printed in western media, and so a human touch is needed.
This particular tragic story was apparently manufactured to hit just those personal notes to generate anger by personalizing the loss, while ignoring the gore that turns on a bloodthirsty media in more crude parts of the world.
Palestinians have been manufacturing the fake deaths of children and attributing them to the Israelis for decades to fit media specific purposes. This story was crafted because it fit a need in Hamas' media strategy, which is all it has left going for it at this time.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 10, 2009 12:15 AM (HcgFD)
Posted by: Charles128 at January 10, 2009 12:26 AM (0Qm2L)
Are you saying "fake, but accurate" might be in play here?
do you really think anyone in Gaza has the time and reason to make up and fake a death of a child.
I think that a) the 'journalist' involved carries a camera and films stuff for a living. So he has time, and the skill, and b) there is a rich tradition of 'fauxtography' coming from arab war zones, so there are reasons to be skeptical.
No one is questioning the fact that children are killed in conflicts like this one. News outlets presented this story as being especially poignant, and somehow representative of Israeli barbarity. People noticed, very quickly, that technical details seemed wrong. The way the CPR was being done did not look right to people who would know the difference.
The story is moving. No one argued otherwise. But it becomes infuriating if, under examination, it turns out to have been faked.
Let me be explicit: No one gets automatic credibility, and no one is above question. The facts are what matter, and these were conveniently recorded so that they can be examined. Any outrage at the attempt to determine whether this piece of reportage is real is not likely sincere, but rather, an attempt to shame us in to not looking. Well, nonsense. We'll look, and we'll say so if something looks fishy.
Posted by: Dave Eaton at January 10, 2009 12:28 AM (HsLsb)
You should do standup because THAT was funny!
Oh...you were serious?
Posted by: Saint Patton at January 10, 2009 12:38 AM (9v34C)
1st generation missiles: Hitler's rockets hitting Great Britain indiscriminately causing a lot of collateral damages.
2nd generation: American missiles, somewhat more precise, but still had uh-oh moments when something other than the targets were hit, and caused some collateral damages.
3rd generation: American smart missiles, those used to pulverize Osama in his cave. They could hit Saddam's house, not killing him.
4th generation: Israeli missiles which are so precise that the Jews use specifically to target small children, the smaller the better, leaving everything else intact. The Jews also use smart bullets that zig-zag and turn corners to hit young children. They used that to kill Al Dura, another 12 years old.
Posted by: ic at January 10, 2009 12:46 AM (NM7Uv)
Also, why is my comment blocked due to questionable content, and why does it not show what error to correct? This seems like some kind of censorship. I will try to post the first part of my post since it is the only relevant part to the actual article.
Posted by: Alex at January 10, 2009 12:56 AM (IVwK4)
Posted by: ic at January 10, 2009 12:57 AM (NM7Uv)
Posted by: SIMdoc at January 10, 2009 01:04 AM (Xw+xA)
Based on watching the video, I believe that most likely the former is true, i.e., it is theatre.
Posted by: dbr1 at January 10, 2009 01:10 AM (XZbBy)
Posted by: Alex at January 10, 2009 01:11 AM (IVwK4)
Uh, of course it is 'some sort of censorship'. It is a content filter...
My earlier comment didn't pass muster until I removed the initials of the Chicken Noodle Network. I see that they passed in at least one case above, so the algorithm must be complex.
Posted by: Dave Eaton at January 10, 2009 01:12 AM (HsLsb)
It's the Jooooos, they're everywhere.
The clicking sound on your window at night, that's not the wind, it's a Jew Claw.
The strange noise from your basement, a Jew sneaking up to snatch your children.
The shadows arching over your wall at night....Jews coming to steal your blood.
Then again, maybe the content filter or whatever just thinks you're an idiot.
Posted by: Riggs at January 10, 2009 01:19 AM (9v34C)
1. A professional news organization.
2. Two doctors with a webcam.
3. Andrew Sachs and a bad mime.
4. The Muppets.
5. The Onion
6. Pravda.
7. Baghdad Bob and his All-Night Newsboys.
8. Cable News Network.
My money's on number eight.
Posted by: What I Think at January 10, 2009 01:22 AM (+loVH)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JNQk2gbROk&feature=related
Posted by: Thripshaw at January 10, 2009 01:54 AM (MCyBl)
Posted by: Brooks at January 10, 2009 02:18 AM (7nelD)
Posted by: Jan at January 10, 2009 03:58 AM (mEui2)
I am completely sympathetic to your sympathy, but your impression that everyone in Gaza is too busy running around saving lives is a little naive. Here's proof:
Look at the missiles still being fired into Israel. There is no defensive purpose to this whatsoever. It has no offensive purpose against IDF either. It is purely a symbolic gesture of defiance, one that is not only totally useless for the immediate combat at hand, but is actually counterproductive, since it only provokes Israel to keep fighting, which in turn will only continue to increase Palestinian casualties. Hamas know this. And yet there they are, coming out into the open and risking their lives to do it, all the same.
You and I would want to save the lives of our own people, so it's natural to assume everyone would behave the same way. But Hamas has a different set of priorities. The evidence is right in front of you.
Posted by: John at January 10, 2009 04:09 AM (r+jvD)
The view by some that the UN is a worthless collection of countries is rather unfair. Was it not through an instrument of this same body that the state of Israel was established?
Posted by: Bayo at January 10, 2009 04:15 AM (Y05wH)
Posted by: rob at January 10, 2009 04:32 AM (iiqMT)
I am sorry to hear about your experience, but those soldiers were undisciplined and did not reflect Israel society as a whole. In 2005, the Israeli Supreme Court banned the use of civilians as human shields by the IDF. After criminal investigations, those military officers responsible for allowing this tactic were censured.
Bayo:
The moral burden does lie with the one who pulls the trigger, but when the one who pulls the trigger is under constant threat of attack, the allowable margin for error must be expanded considerably. I've noticed that people who condemn the casualty rate seem to think that Israel should fight with more reserve, and thus be willing to sacrifice a few of its soldiers if that means saving the lives of many more of the enemy's civilians.
This is preposterous. Israeli soldiers are people's kids too, and their government must value and protect their lives first. It is not just entitled to do so, it has a moral obligation to its citizens to do so.
Posted by: John at January 10, 2009 04:54 AM (r+jvD)
"blah blah blah you're all Nazis blah blah kill the Jews blah blah allahu ackbar blah blah i like rabbits blah."
Posted by: Vaultenblogger at January 10, 2009 05:14 AM (HG6DM)
Somalis attacked the Ethiopians with the tactics that they had used against US and UN troops i.e. they would send a group of Somali women and children down the street and then Somali men with AK-47s would fire at the American or UN soldiers from the rear of the crowd.
The Ethiopians, who have been dealing with Somalis for more than a thousand years, were amused. The Ethiopians reported that hiding behind women and children was not a particularly effective tactic since the bullets the Ethiopians fired can go right through the bodies of the women and children to hit the Somali gunmen.
Posted by: Gilligan at January 10, 2009 06:21 AM (TX6eJ)
Posted by: Mark at January 10, 2009 06:34 AM (JAT+/)
I give up ...
Posted by: Moe at January 10, 2009 07:16 AM (rXuj8)
Posted by: George Hussein at January 10, 2009 07:54 AM (f6hWj)
One must relieze hamas isn't firing the rockets for the hell of it. they didn't wake up one morning and decide out of the blue to fire off a few rockets. no, it's built up rage they are angry at israeli politics.
Posted by: alex pawel at January 10, 2009 08:22 AM (/aRm/)
More concerning, the boy's body could be real, having been cleaned up after his death. This was purportedly a Norwegian hospital and the physician on the left is Norwegian apparently. Using a dead child's body as a prop in a charade filmed for propaganda purposes, especially when "CPR" is performed, is highly unethical for any physician. Furthermore, it borders on desecration of the body.
The Norwegian Board of Medicine should be informed of this physician's incompetent, or more likely unethical, behavior.
Posted by: TLM at January 10, 2009 08:48 AM (VOL2j)
Possible = True. Welcome to Libthink.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at January 10, 2009 09:03 AM (cvmgB)
Posted by: Giovanni at January 10, 2009 09:16 AM (AYhe6)
Posted by: JIM FESTIN at January 10, 2009 09:17 AM (crD4t)
I have seen suicide children, AK47 tote children and the fanatical parents who use there children as shields. I ran away and crossed the border to get out...I'll never go back..never.
Those people are not human to see what they have done to my family. The muslim people are brainwashed...I'll never return home.never.
Posted by: Jay MK johnson at January 10, 2009 09:31 AM (svozh)
i am yet to read of a time when the isrealis wakes up one day and starts a fight! how come all the days hamas has been blasting away at isreal we all forgot to condemn thier actions and the moment isreal decides to fight back the whole world starts to condemn isreal from east to west!
are we truthful with ourselves? what would we do if hamas decides our homes are the next desination of thier rockets?
maybe we would advice ourself to remain calm and appeal fopr peace! i wonder!
Posted by: archie at January 10, 2009 09:36 AM (/ZZh5)
Posted by: Fred Beloit at January 10, 2009 09:40 AM (ulKU8)
Palestinians! If you want peace quit electing terrorists (HAMAS) to lead your government. Tell them to quit firing rockets into a legal nation. Grow up and live in peace with those different than you like the majority of others on this earth and your life will be a lot happier!
Posted by: Doji Ahmad at January 10, 2009 10:07 AM (YgL5H)
Posted by: luke at January 10, 2009 10:27 AM (nF+Fm)
Posted by: Rickz66 at January 10, 2009 10:32 AM (+/SRs)
Posted by: William H at January 10, 2009 10:33 AM (x0fD8)
Posted by: Mack Jenson at January 10, 2009 10:48 AM (Bl9+Y)
Gaza embargo... wasn't that when they got tirede of the brave palis sending women and children with bombs to murder people in restaurants and hospitals? Same reason they built the fence that clowns like you refer to as a 'war crime'?
Posted by: Firehand at January 10, 2009 11:02 AM (GAf+S)
Posted by: daleyrocks at January 10, 2009 11:40 AM (odYIP)
Posted by: ikeri chukwudi at January 10, 2009 11:49 AM (tdeSR)
to have enoufgh money for ARMS. they thrive when they parade DEAD women & children for the worlds sympaty they are EXPERTS at PR( AS WITNESSED
IN JERICHO THE MASSACRE WHEN THEY CARRIED A DEAD MAN ON A STRETCHER WHEN HE FELL OF AND HE ROSE TO RUN AFTER THE STRETCHER TO GET BACK ON)look at derfur when they claim to be undernourished look at the children & women with bones portruding, how much help is given to these people? yet these bloodsuckers continue to milk the world for sympathy and no matter how much is given it seems like a bottomless pit.
Posted by: mayer at January 10, 2009 12:48 PM (bmea0)
a matter of hours without taking any casualties itself. Instead they choose to go in on the ground to minimise the "collateral damage" to the innocent population, risking a significant
potential loss to it's troops. Hamas leadership
in turn, is safe and sound in Damascus, Beirut and Teheran willing to fight to the last woman and child of Gaza. How brave, indeed.
Posted by: paisan at January 10, 2009 12:53 PM (nOJOx)
Posted by: ScooterGirl at January 10, 2009 12:57 PM (QmUel)
Posted by: geminiG at January 10, 2009 12:57 PM (GlqN7)
TO HELL WITH THEM.
Israelis ought to do what is neccessary and finnish these cockroaches off for good! Give Iran a taster of what is to come too, wouldn't go amiss either imho!
Posted by: Dave J at January 10, 2009 01:05 PM (o7bbw)
Throughout it's history, Israel has always acted in self-defense. In 1948, they fought for their right to exist when they were attacked by the Arab world. Both Arabs and Jews fought on the side of Israel to protect their nation. In 1967, Israel was attacked again. Both Arabs and Jews fought in this short conflict and achieved an overwhelming victory. In 1973, Israel was attacked again and achieved another dramatic victory - with both Arabs and Jews in their military.
The PLO and Hamas have both carried the goal of killing the Jews by driving them into the sea. They claim "Palestine" as theirs - yet the word Palestine comes from Syria et al Palestina, which was the Roman name given to this area when it was under their control. Later the Ottoman Turks took over and lost control of the area to the British in WWI. In history, the Arabs have never controlled Palestine, creating a great hoax where a race is created out of a lie. These people have been used as tools to fight the Jews and eliminate them from the Middle East. They were granted Trans-Jordan for the Arab population. In 1948, they were granted another Arab property in Palestine, yet this was again not good enough.
As long as these people continue to preach hatred and destruction, they should not be surprised when they face the consequences of their actions. Israel doesn't teach their children to hate, yet the other side does (just watch Palestinian TV or read one of their text books). Until ordinary citizens stand up and realized that they are being victimized by their own beliefs and not by the Jews, the Catholics or any other race or creed, we can expect these types of conflicts to continue. Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Fatah, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Al Queda, et al must be eliminated to ensure the safety of those that do not follow extreme Islamic principles. Until they stand up and refuse to be used by these groups, a live in the same areas they use to attack from, everyone in those areas are at risk.
For America, 9/11 was an attack on our civilians and the Palestinians celebrated. For Britain 7/7 was an attack on their civilians, and the Palestinians celebrated. For Israel, these rocket attacks are indescriminate attacks on their civilians, and the Palestinians continue to celebrate these attacks and support the murderers that launch these rockets. If you are a Palestinian and you truly want peace, remove these monsters from your collective society and ignore the hate they preach. Until then, Israel will have to begin the process of removing them and defending their God given right to live in their homeland, in peace.
Posted by: jjwspider at January 10, 2009 01:09 PM (x5dSR)
Posted by: Vince at January 10, 2009 01:11 PM (i4Fy3)
http://www.aish(dot)com/jewishissues/israeldiary/Victim_of_the_Media_War.asp
Posted by: jjwspider at January 10, 2009 01:26 PM (x5dSR)
a matter of hours without taking any casualties itself. Instead they choose to go in on the ground to minimise the "collateral damage" to the innocent population, risking a significant
potential loss to it's troops. Hamas leadership
in turn, is safe and sound in Damascus, Beirut and Teheran willing to fight to the last woman and child of Gaza. How brave, indeed.
Well said, I have been saying that for YEARS!
Posted by: Mikael at January 10, 2009 01:29 PM (cH4Yh)
That's you Ron Paul, isn't it? Welcome to the board Congressman.
Posted by: daleyrocks at January 10, 2009 01:29 PM (odYIP)
Posted by: vince at January 10, 2009 01:41 PM (i4Fy3)
Posted by: Frank Gumbaza at January 10, 2009 01:50 PM (VWG23)
Great to hear an ARAB who has some common sense!!! Your a little off though! The Jews in Israel have been experiencing genocide since the 1930's!!! The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem started the Arab riots in the 30's slaughtering just below 60,000 people (not even half that have died on both sides from 1947 till now). He did it because he wanted the world to know there are no other people living in Palestine except Arabs (although 70%+ of the Palestinian Muslims ARE NOT ARAB!!!). Of course he stil did not kill ALL the indiginous Jews, Non-Arab Christians, and Druze, but he tried. The very fact that the so called Palestinians use that name is racist, as every single inhabitant of Palestine was a Palestinian. There were and still are a large number of Jews in Israel who have an unbroken history in the country from pre-babalonian exile, so only they can claim to be the "Indiginous race of Palestine" as the Philistines were finally decimated by the Asyrians, and King Solomon did a good job on them before that. The Canaanites were wiped out completely and Neither race were ARAB.
The problem as always with any conflict caused by the middle east Arabs is ISLAM regardless of what is said, it is a relligion of hate and murder, anyone who claims otherwise is either a liar or has not studied the Quran and the Hadith along with the accepted Sunni and Shia interpretations. So those who compare the IDF to Nazis are wrong, the NAZIS here are the Palestinians ALL OF THEM!!! They can be compared to both NAZIS and the Japanese culture before the US handled that evil culture, yes the Japanese had a culture of racial supperiority and hate for thoussands of years. When dealing with a lunatic fringe culture NO ONE including women and children need be worried about, as indoctrination starts at 3, and you'd be suprised at how difficult deprogramming and reeducation is even at 5 or 6 years old. Let's also not forget that the so called Palestinians (as the Grand Mufti started that lied) actually were co-architects of Hitler's final solution, the mufti went to young Hitler in the early 1920's to convince him that mass deportation was not enough, and efficient murder on a large scale is required lest the Jews join the indiginous Jews in Palestine and outnumber the Arabs and the Slavic Muslim majority.
Posted by: Moses at January 10, 2009 02:11 PM (5yzGO)
Posted by: gabe barkoczi at January 10, 2009 02:15 PM (VCPDU)
1. Is the Holocaust the ONLY act of anti-Semitism that you are aware of? If so, then it is no wonder that you don't understand.....
2. Taking someone's land... query me this: at what point will Tibetans lose the right to their homeland? After all, they no longer control it and they are a distinct minority now and decreasing fast due to Chinese policy. So after how many years does the Dalai Lama's rights expire and Chinese imperialism win?
Posted by: AEWHistory at January 10, 2009 02:27 PM (ZNWvf)
Posted by: jjwspider at January 10, 2009 02:45 PM (x5dSR)
Posted by: Nazir at January 10, 2009 02:45 PM (WiV69)
When you actualy study the history of Palestine from a reputable NON-Muslim source, you'll find Palestine had a unbroken Jewish population pre-dating the Babalonian exile. Also when the Ottomons brought in the Slavic Muslims who made 70% of the so called Palestinian population in 1947, they also brought in more Jews, Christians, Druze and Bedoins. So NO one took the Palestinians land, they were unwanted Migrant workers brought in by one of the most evil Empires in world history. Don't forget the Ottomons were Pirating, Extorting, and Murdering Eupoeans and Americans for hundreds of years, and when asked why they said because Islam demands that the Infedel be treated in that manner! So much for the BS that this sort of thing is a new concept created by a few extremists who hijacked the "Peaceful" Islam!!!
Posted by: Moses at January 10, 2009 03:00 PM (5yzGO)
The Italian - throws the cup, breaks it, and walks away in a fit of rage.
The German - carefully washes the cup, sterilizes it and makes a new cup
of coffee.
The Frenchman - takes out the fly, and drinks the coffee.
The Chinese - eats the fly and throws away the coffee.
The Russian - Drinks the coffee with the fly, since it was extra with no
charge.
The Israeli - sells the coffee to the Frenchman, the fly to the Chinese,
drinks tea and uses the extra money to invent a device that prevents
flies from falling into coffee.
The Palestinian - blames the Israeli for the fly falling in his coffee,
protests the act of aggression to the UN, takes a loan from the European
Union to buy a new cup of coffee, uses the money to purchase explosives
and then blows up the coffee house where the Italian, the Frenchman, the
Chinese, the German and the Russian are all trying to explain to the
Israeli that he should give away his cup of tea to the Palestinian.
Posted by: iz at January 10, 2009 03:07 PM (C10fc)
Acutally NO they are not called Philistines, the Grand Mufti named them that (actually Filistines they call themselves now) in an attempt to associate them with that race so they can claim they are the oldest indiginous race. Only probelm is that we KNOW the Philistines were a violent race who were related to Turks and Greeks, basically a preditor race similiar to the concept of the Alians in the movie Independence Day.
Once that lie backfired there was the Canaanite movement among them to claim they are decendents of the Canaanites, however their pitch was their were NO other races especially NO Jews in Palestine prior to 1947, and in fact the whole idea of Jews in Palestine was manufacutred by the Evil Zionists in Europe in the 1920s. So their Canaanite movement backfired on them as well as it acknowledged an old Jewish presense and that contracdicted the Zionist BS story they still preach today.
The Arab minority of todays Palestinians (they are actually 70%+ Slavic Muslims) are the decendents of Ismael Abrahams son. It says clearly in the Old Testament that this race will be blessed in great numbers, but they will be a violent BEAST LIKE Hoard causing mayhem wherever they go. Not much of a religious zealot myself, but whowever wrote that has them pegged!!!
Posted by: Moses at January 10, 2009 03:11 PM (5yzGO)
A few things not tolerated here:
profanitycheerleading for the genocide of any groupsock-puppeting, the practice of posting multiple comments under different screen names and email addresses to create fellow commenters that agree with your positionposts that wander far of topicutterly pointless postsposts that are incoherent
I just deleted 37 comments that violated these guidelines, roughly equal, I think from both sides of the equation and few people in the middle.
Most of the commenters on this particular post are "drive-bys" and probably won't be back. That's fine.
For those of you would would like to return to comment upon this article or others, please keep these guidelines in mind.
Thanks,
The MGMT
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 10, 2009 03:32 PM (HcgFD)
I was in Israel just a few months ago. Do you know that in the West bank you can sit in an open air coffeshop and have a latte ? I thought to myself of how thing seem to have greatly improved there from just a few years ago. But it was not so in the Gaza.
What offended me recently was an interview with what a very educated and well spoken Palestinian woman linked from Yahoo News(perhaps some of you saw it too). But all she did was lie. She said "It's important to note that the Hamas rockets do not have explosive heads". If that is so (and it is not) then launching those rockets into Israel is truly a stupid gesture. But then, I've seen personally seen the impact sites of those rockets. You don;t need to be an expert to tell that they definitely have exposive heads. Not only that, we found many blackened roofing nails around the impact site. These were obviously placed around the explosive head to become shrapnel.
She claimed that the tunnels were for smuggling food and humanitrian supplies. But, we all saw the IDF films from the F-16 cameras and what happenned when thier missles struck those tunnels. Funny that. I've never seen food and humanitarian aid supplies cause those kinds of secondary explosions (Oh right, that was the medical Isopropyl rubbing alcohol, my bad !! ).
She accused the interviewer of never having been to Gaza. I suppose that she did not do her homework because that interviewer has many times been there and told her so. Eventually he had to just cut her off.
I noted that every single statement she made was either an outright lie or misleading to the extreme. Does she comprehend just how much she damages her own credibility ? Every time I see any interview with here I now must question anything and everything she says. PALs, pick a better representative.
But all things considered, I think that Israel's actions were rash and unwise. All Hamas has to do is to survive and they will declare a victory.(and since most of them are outside of Gaza, you can bet that claim will be made). Sure it might temporarily halt the rocket threat, but they have just assured that there will be another generation of willing PAL militants who will remember all of this.
But on the other hand, what di the Hamas militants expect was going to happen when they resumed full sclate rocket attacks (by the way, for those of you who do not know, Hamas continued to launch rockets into Israel during the truce, just not so frequently. Hamas claimed that these were rogue militants not under their control - Yea right! But then, some Israeli's also violated the truce. But hey, those were rogue Israeli militants also ! See how it works ?
But there is one thing that is certain. Hamas is a roadblock to Palestinian peace and independence. With them in the picture, it will never happen. Given the contrast between life in the West Bank and life in Gaza the right choice should be obvious.
In some ways I do also assogn some responsibility for this to the Gazans. Surely they knew that when they elected Hamas into power that nothing good could possibly have come from it. not only that, they also had to know a vote for Hamas was a vote to greatly multiply their suffering.
If the Gazans want to move forward, have peace and prosperity for their people, they must get rid of Hamas. And they cannot say that n one told them so. They knew what would happen, and did it anyway. and this makes me wonder what is the mindset of the average Gazan.
In conclusion, this action by Israel was a bone-headed move. The Gazans electing Hamas and kicking out the PA was a boneheaded move. Firing rockets into Israel was a boneheaded move.
I have to wonder Is there anyone over there on either side who possess's any inteliigence or clarity of thought.
The Hamas charter calls for the total destruction of Israel, and says that negotiations and truces are a waste of time.
Posted by: Jim at January 10, 2009 03:32 PM (LRyI/)
Posted by: joe ny at January 10, 2009 03:39 PM (n38LG)
Posted by: Mikael at January 10, 2009 04:07 PM (cH4Yh)
Posted by: JOE NY at January 10, 2009 04:20 PM (n38LG)
Posted by: joe ny at January 10, 2009 04:25 PM (n38LG)
On the ground, if everyone is really concerned about leaving non-combatants in peace, stop firing rockets and mortars into Israel (BONEHEADED!)and Israel will stop its actions in Gaza. It would be helpful for the outside powers to cease encouraging this mischief which does no good to any innocent civilian caught in the middle of this.
Eschew this false doctrine of Allah will sort out his own, or "Our God has a bigger dick than your god, therefore is on OUR side" This is not helpful.
Real men should not hide behind the skirts of women and children, Hospitals and Sacred places. If they feel they must make war, let them go forth, fight and die openly, like soldiers of real nations. There is honor in that, everything else is cowardly, swineish, devoid of glory. One does not earn martyrdom this way. No one gets virgins after death.
Religion is a stupid thing to make war over.
It is absurd and wrong to define your humanity, and that of others based on choice of religion.
It is absurd to kill and die on behalf of any god (invisible or otherwise) that will not provably return the favor personally.
Time, demographics and the ballot box will eventually sort this out without another shot being fired in anger.
Keep your lives. Love your children. Teach them the Golden Rule (not the one with the gold and ruling). Grow and thrive in peace. Diversify your media choices. Think for yourselves. Bad things inevitably happen to those how leave that to others. JAS
PS: This contributer works for the frequently Criticized News Network. I have heard it said that when your network is criticized by all sides, that it is doing the best possible job.
Posted by: Jesse at January 10, 2009 04:45 PM (KZ/Ox)
Posted by: joe ny at January 10, 2009 04:48 PM (n38LG)
Controlling the airway and ventilating the patient is still part of an in-hospital resuscitation. You're referring to bystander CPR which is not the situation at this Norwegian hospital in Gaza.
The Norwegian doctor is identified (by name) as a surgeon in the UK Channel 4 video.
Posted by: TLM at January 10, 2009 05:27 PM (VOL2j)
Look at 0:40 on the video. There is clearly tape across the right face leading to the mouth. This would suggest the patient has been intubated. You cannot actually see the face in the video during the code, so I'm not sure how anyone can say the patient isn't being ventilated. They show a tech or someone to the left of the patient and to the right of the worker doing compressions, so perhaps he's providing the bagging.
Posted by: SPW at January 10, 2009 06:09 PM (VftLx)
phone number for the white house
microphone to headset
replacement phone screens
switch phone provider
reverse cell phone lookup with name
razor cell phone deals
my microphone dosent work
loan information phone
new pink cell phones
rgis phone number
slide phone prices
bud headphones black
telephone prefference service
wilmar mn phone
sony mobile phone games
digital phone problems
ledger joker poster
business phone numbers search
telephone and fax preference service
fake cell phone trace
samsung i320n gsm tri band smartphone with qwerty
mobile phone accessories online
pearl room phone
philips noise canceling folding headphones hn110
sph200w wifi phone with
dial direct phone
epiphone les paul standard vintage sunburst
bareilly phone number
el conquistador phone
got no telephone
cheap used att cell phones
do singstar microphones work
good shore fishing spots
phone tap definition
beepers n phones of
razor phone warranty
wallpapers for your phone
pa fishing and hunting
door phone circuit
kirbyville texas phone
sleek cell phone
cisco ip phone buy
saltwater fishing info
w370 cell phone
cell phone chargers wholesale
cabo fishing lucas
buescher saxophone history
phone line networking
phone number 349
htc p3400i smartphone with
san manuel phone
cell phone accesories store
Posted by: Wkvenajn at January 10, 2009 11:28 PM (fU49a)
it all goes back to simple politics. if israel treated there neighbors with respect i would bet my house that rockets would rain down no more.
One must relieze hamas isn't firing the rockets for the hell of it. they didn't wake up one morning and decide out of the blue to fire off a few rockets. no, it's built up rage they are angry at israeli politics."
Your basic problem is that you dwell in ignorance. If you had even a miniscule understanding of history you would know that what you said is pure BS. For many years, Hamas has stated bold-facedly that they wanted all the Jews dead. They don't care whether Israelites drop bombs on them or not, they will kill every Jew they can reach until "Palestine" is totally clear of Jews. They aren't interested in a better life for the people of Gaza; all the Gazans are are tools to be used and killed by Hamas. The proof of that is in the history of the Gaza Strip since before Hamas took it over, illegally! They know that if they fire enough rockets and send in enough suicide bombers then Israel will retaliate; then imbeciles like you will all jump up screaming about how the Jews are killers and inhumanitarian and try to bring the UN, the Arab league, and every Arab country screaming for the Jews to be tried for war crimes. Of course no one ever mentions about the Hamas killing innocent civilians; men, women and children; on purpose. Just as they have been doing with their rockets for years.
Israel moved out of the Gaza Strip in 2006, forcibly moving Jewish settlers by use of the IDF. Israel left homes, businesses, and many green houses capable of turning out food to feed the Gazans and what happened? The Gazans destroyed everything the Jews left for them, Voilz, no food and then they cried to the world that the Israelis wouldn't feed them and the idiots at the UN sent in food whgich was taken by Hamas so that Hamas could look like saviors to the ignorant Gazans who then voted Hamas into government which turned on the legal government and killed them, imprisoned them, or chased them out of the Strip.
So, who do you think are the bad guys? The Jews who tried to help the "Palestinians" build a country or Hamas who are busy tearing the place apart, using food sent in to Gaza to buy arms to attack Israel?
DUHHHHH :p
Posted by: PhotoPro at January 10, 2009 11:32 PM (5SyNb)
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2009/01/israel-invades-gaza-in-attempt-to.html
Posted by: Muslims Against Sharia at January 11, 2009 12:09 AM (cJOhW)
Another possibility is that it's doing an awful job.
Posted by: Pablo at January 11, 2009 09:02 AM (yTndK)
Posted by: Pablo at January 11, 2009 11:32 AM (yTndK)
Posted by: Al Safi at January 11, 2009 05:25 PM (akWBb)
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0289 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0159 seconds, 90 records returned.
Page size 74 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.