Anatomy of a Media Hoax
As the IDF campaign in Gaza continues, so do attempts by Hamas and Hamas sympathizers to use the western media as an often willing propaganda tool.
Yesterday, media critic Charles Johnson commented on Little Green Footballs about a 2-minute CNN story that purported to show the death of a Palestinian child in Gaza that was captured on film by his brother. Here is a copy of that CNN story.- basic medical procedures are poorly faked
- known propaganda actors are used in this film
- the site of the attack is poorly-constructed and inconsistent with a military attack.
- the body doesn't act like a body



What makes mad Mads appearance in this video all the more shocking is that he can't be bother to even help make this bit of theater mildly convincing by even going through the motions of giving the victim air, a complaint quickly voiced by doctors who viewed the clip.
International media reports, including those from the BBC, CBS, CNN and FOX’s sister station Sky News, present Gilbert as an ordinary doctor. But a look at his record shows that Gilbert, 61, is a political activist and member of the Norwegian Maoist "Red" party, and he has been involved in solidarity work for the Palestinians since the 1970s. He has criticized the international aid organization Doctors Without Borders for refusing to take sides in conflicts. Gilbert volunteers at the Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza with the Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC), an aid organization funded by the Norwegian government, and he has been interviewed by the media on a variety of issues. Israeli government officials have said Hamas hides weapons in the hospital where Gilbert works. NGO Monitor, an Israeli human rights watchdog group, says Gilbert presents one-sided criticism of Israel to the media and has accused Israel of deliberately targeting civilians in its Gaza offensive to stop Hamas from firing rockets into Israel. In addition to being supportive of the terrorist organization Hamas, Gilbert has voiced support for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Frankly, we need Foreman and House on this. If we're going to have fake CPR, we need to have fake doctors who can pretend to do it more convincingly. Now, let's look at the impact site of the alleged Israeli drone's missile attack.
I'm no military expert, but I am a doctor, and this video is bullsh-t. The chest compressions that were being performed at the beginning of this video were absolutely, positively fake. The large man in the white coat was NOT performing CPR on that child. He was just sort of tapping on the child's sternum a little bit with his fingers. You can't make blood flow like that. Furthermore, there's no point in doing chest compressions if you're not also ventilating the patient somehow. In this video, I can't tell for sure if the patient has an endotracheal tube in place, but you can see that there is nobody bag-ventilating him (a bag is actually hanging by the head of the bed), and there is no ventilator attached to the patient. In a hospital, during a code on a ventilated patient, somebody would probably be bagging the patient during the chest compressions. And they also would have moved the bed away from the wall, so that somebody could get back there to intubate the patient and/or bag him. In short, the "resuscitation scene" at the beginning is fake, and it's a pretty lame fake at that.





Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:31 AM
Comments
Watch it again, you'll see what I mean.
Posted by: DMartyr at January 09, 2009 02:29 PM (tm8pC)
This IS journalistic fakery, for sure, but I suspect it involves a real dead child. Simply because parts are faked does not mean the whole thing is a fake: the most effective lies are half truths.
Posted by: One thing at January 09, 2009 03:12 PM (5V/kc)
Posted by: skating on glue at January 09, 2009 03:15 PM (cvtzI)
Also isn't that the good doctor at 1:46 helping out as a pallbearer?
Posted by: Dr. Eszterhazy at January 09, 2009 03:22 PM (M7l9H)
Posted by: mekan at January 09, 2009 03:38 PM (hm8tW)
Posted by: lawhawk at January 09, 2009 04:21 PM (xFg3I)
They've been working on this kid and their scrubs are immaculate. Their gloves look like they came right out of the box. In fact, in those pics at lawhawk's in every one Gilbert looks like he just got on shift.
How did he manage to work on a kid and not get anything on himself or even on his hands?
Posted by: Spade at January 09, 2009 04:48 PM (7WUru)
"... For the lungs to fill with air, they must first be forcefully compressed using hard and deep pressure..."
The purpose of the chest compressions is not to empty the lungs (they will empty naturally due to their elasticity and the positive pressure) but to provide pressure to the heart and pump the blood.
I don't mean to step on any toes, I just think it's important that we remain accurate when calling these goat humping motherless scumbags out.
Thank you.
Posted by: Paul at January 09, 2009 04:56 PM (nlaiH)
Thanks.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 09, 2009 05:03 PM (HcgFD)
Posted by: Skye at January 09, 2009 07:32 PM (v4jU2)
I still have no idea how he died (what wounds) or what he looked like.
And, how long till rigor sets in?
And, haven't these people heard of mortuary services? From other grave-parades I have seen, they have really bundled up the body wrapping it up real nice and tight in adorned wraps. Typically Hizballah green or the Pallie flag. But, this kid is buried in a loosely wrapped white.... thing?
Also, at the hospital. what is the deal with the colorful towel or blanket on the hospital gurney? Wouldn't that be one of the first things removed after a dying person is brought in?
And, if the kid was dead, wouldn't the monitor NOT be beeping, but a steady tone?
Posted by: captainfish at January 09, 2009 11:30 PM (H+bUa)
Posted by: SPW at January 10, 2009 12:01 AM (VftLx)
It certainly isn't the way I was taught CPR.
More importantly, I don't know of any hospital anywhere that would allow a family member to be present during actual emergency procedures. I also don't know of any hospital anywhere that would allow anyone to make a video of any procedure without prior permission.
Posted by: Trish at January 10, 2009 12:28 AM (83Cz6)
Thanks for posting this and keep up the good work.
You sir, are a BlogGod.
Posted by: The Sniper at January 10, 2009 12:30 AM (6PxUw)
Having family members present during resuscitations is frequently done in the United States and there have been many studies showing that parents appreciate being able to be present. I always allow parents and family members in the room when I am running a code. Your contention that family members being present during this resuscitation means it is fake is totally unfounded. In terms of the video, yes no U.S. hospital would allow that. But it's friggin' Gaza.
Posted by: SPW at January 10, 2009 09:30 AM (VftLx)
I've never known a hospital in the USA to allow family present during resuscitation efforts, ever. If you do, you are very unusual. And yes, I wanted desperately to be present when the hospital was running a code on my father, but I was not allowed to be. So your contention that this is SOP is suspect.
And I don't care if it's "friggin' Gaza," no real doctor would allow that video camera in.
Posted by: Trish at January 10, 2009 01:49 PM (zsqVO)
From a the paper entitled:
Report on the National Consensus Conference on Family Presence During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Procedures
Author: Henderson, D.P. et al,
Publication: Pediatric Emergency Care 21(11):787, November 2005
Results: General recommendations included consideration of FP (family presence) as an option during pediatric procedure and CPR, and offering this option to family members when the child's care will not be interrupted, after assessment for combative and threatening behavior, extreme emotial volatility, apparent family member intociation or altered mental status, disagreement among family members and apparent threats to the safety of the healthcare team (which should be considered at all times). If FP is not offered, the reasons for this action should be documented. Written policies and procedures regarding FP should be in place for in-hospital transport and transfer settings, with items to include definitions of all relevant terms, preparation of family members and processes for escorting family members in and out of the treatment area, handling of disagreements and staff support. FP policies should be subjected to legal review and education should be provided for healthcare personnel.
**My contentions are not suspect. They are the most recent recommendations from numerous medical authorities. Is it done in every hospital in the US? No, especially if they are ignorant of current trends.
Go ahead and pull that article, it refrences all the most recent literature on the matter.
Posted by: Trish at January 10, 2009 03:37 PM (VftLx)
Posted by: SPW at January 10, 2009 06:25 PM (VftLx)
News to me and I work in a Chicago hospital as a telemetry nurse . Nobody in their right mind would want a family member inside the room during an active code situation . Code Blues are extremely stressful on the staff and having the family in an active code puts more stress on the staff to not screw up or more likely ,undue stress and worry due to the likelihood that the family might sue them for not doing enough for their loved ones . Aside from the obvious , there are a lot of people inside the patient's room during a code . The team leader which is usually the Attending/Consult/Fellow or the charge nurse , the compressor , the bagger , the medication nurse , the recorder , the respiratory therapist , lab tech , the reliefs , the runner , medical residents and other nurses going in and out of the room helping the code team in their task of saving the patient . Now, where would you propose to put the family during the controlled chaos of an active code ?
Nice study , problem is , did they happen to asked the people running the codes especially involving pediatric patients on how they feel of having the Damocles sword hanging above their heads when they let distraught family members in an active Pedia code blue . And about medical and nursing studies , 60% is pure BS , 20% is biased . 10% is useless , 5% is pure propaganda and the remaining 5% are just plain common sense .
Posted by: Wil at January 11, 2009 01:22 AM (4sHuN)
Posted by: douglas at January 11, 2009 03:01 AM (20QoQ)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0042 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.002 seconds, 28 records returned.
Page size 28 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.