More Indoctrinated "Obama Youth"
The pseudo-militant look of step-dancing in this video, combined with the old-style military woodland BDUs, is going to frighten those unfamiliar with stepping, though it shouldn't. In and of itself, it is an awesome form of dance to watch.
The stepping, combined with the cultish fanaticism focusing on Obama, however, is going to freak some people out.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:53 PM
Comments
Posted by: Sara at October 04, 2008 01:07 PM (Wi/N0)
Posted by: RayC at October 04, 2008 01:39 PM (hD7Qb)
Turning the bullet points of Senator Obama's health care proposals into a semi-liturgical memorized chant is ultra-creepy.
Posted by: Clint at October 04, 2008 01:44 PM (oZ5OG)
Posted by: Matt at October 04, 2008 02:46 PM (Cn+Ma)
Posted by: db1820 at October 04, 2008 03:22 PM (W5g/T)
Either way you slice it, this video bothers the heck out of me.
Posted by: Nina at October 04, 2008 03:53 PM (cHSOu)
Posted by: Sara at October 04, 2008 04:06 PM (Wi/N0)
Sorry, but my religion states, "Thou shalt not have FALSE GODS before me."
End of story.
You might also want to check this out:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=307928498550592
Posted by: Gerry at October 04, 2008 06:04 PM (fHRdA)
Cult of personality
I know your anger, I know your dreams
Ive been everything you want to be
Im the cult of personality
Like mussolini and kennedy
Im the cult of personality
Cult of personality
Cult of personality
Neon lights, a nobel prize
The mirror speaks, the reflection lies
You dont have to follow me
Only you can set me free
I sell the things you need to be
Im the smiling face on your t.v.
Im the cult of personality
I exploit you still you love me
I tell you one and one makes three
Im the cult of personality
Like joseph stalin and gandi
Im the cult of personality
Cult of personality
Cult of personality
Living Colour
Anyone see the parallels?
Posted by: Big Country at October 04, 2008 06:28 PM (niydV)
Posted by: cmblake6 at October 04, 2008 07:56 PM (QSVQf)
Alpha Omega is a fraternity of Jewish dental students.
Idiot.
Name calling is fun.
Posted by: Vermin at October 04, 2008 08:19 PM (iO5n6)
If the "Obama Truth Squads" in Missouri are a portent of things to come, Americans who refuse to live on the liberal plantation if this angry unaccomplished empty suit gets elected, might get a good taste of the kind of velvet gulag today's liberal Democrats offer.
We must be ready to stand firm on both the First and Second Amendment of our Constitution if we have any hope of exposing the wolves in sheep's clothing on the left for what they really are in the coming years ... closet fascists.
Posted by: Libmeister at October 04, 2008 08:25 PM (hkLmQ)
Posted by: Chad at October 04, 2008 08:26 PM (kaeov)
Why does Barack Obama allow this to be done?
Don't tell me he doesn't know.
What kind of personality disorder does one have that allows this?
Posted by: JAL at October 04, 2008 08:30 PM (4TU0O)
Those kids need to get out and run around the track a few times. They look out of shape.
Posted by: miriam at October 04, 2008 09:00 PM (KuH24)
Posted by: Lazlo Toth at October 04, 2008 09:31 PM (fUOXs)
Posted by: Mister Snitch at October 04, 2008 09:37 PM (U+ya4)
Posted by: Richard at October 04, 2008 09:39 PM (bQHDM)
You are assuming our Constitution will still exist under the Obama Administration. I strongly believe it will be destroyed and the USA will become a One Party State.
That is what these radicals want. They want a revolution. They tried it by not funding the war in hopes that our troops would get tired and lay down their weapons and desert. When that didn't happen, they found an African-American to come along and secure the black/minority vote.
That way they could shout, "Racism!" whenever we disagree with their Master. And there goes our freedom of speech.
The McCain campaign better wake to this before it is all over...
And we true blue Americans better get on our knees and ask God to have mercy on us one more time....even though we do not deserve it.
Posted by: Artist at October 04, 2008 09:44 PM (1z/5R)
Posted by: dave at October 04, 2008 10:01 PM (ki+Cz)
When gangs of Obama Youth rampage through conservative neighborhoods, shattering windows, catching opposition newspapers on fire, cracking heads open with pool cues, raping, and throwing people off roofs, you might have a point.
Until then, all you've got is some overly impressionable kids singing some dumb songs.
Just how paranoid are you George Bush Republicans?
Keith Nolan
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 04, 2008 10:38 PM (2iAhy)
Posted by: bc at October 04, 2008 11:01 PM (i++qn)
When the Swift Boaters turned me into a Democrat in 2004 with their lies, I slapped on a Kerry bumper sticker.... and was flashed the finger by several GOPers, and almost run off the road by several fine youths in a pick-up truck. (I lived in rural Missouri at the time.)
It never occured to me that I'd been attacked by members of a non-existent Bush Youth gang. I just thought I'd encountered some jerks.
You guys are beyond paranoid! No one's gonna burn your car!
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 04, 2008 11:58 PM (2iAhy)
Murder and violence is no problem because it is viewed as exterminating those who stand in the way of true progress but in the end it is only a way that leads to eternal death. Once the USA as founded by the fore fathers of this nation disappears this world will lose its last restraint. Nobama! No Ayers! No Rev Wright! No Barney Franks! No Harry Reid! No Pelosi! Take your peaceful stand while you have the God given freedom to do so and speak out flush him and them out and vote this Obama thug down and out.
Posted by: TonyUSA at October 04, 2008 11:58 PM (KE4sc)
It becomes a simple matter to turn them into the equivalent of Chavez Thugs , the SA and what have you . Once Obama comes into power , it will be so easy for their leaders to use them as they see fit like silencing Obama's foes for instance .
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 12:05 AM (4sHuN)
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 12:14 AM (4sHuN)
With respect to the topic at hand, if the ever-present deification of Obama by his supporters doesn't unsettle you, then I pity you. Societies the sing songs to "great leaders" are not free societies... ask the Cubans, Koreans, et.al.
Posted by: Tom at October 05, 2008 12:37 AM (VmACN)
With that background, it was obvious the Swifties were lying about numerous subjects, from Kerry's supposedly unearned Silver Star (hundreds of officers got the exact same medal for very similar actions), to the actual conduct of the war, as testified to by Kerry's Winter Soldiers. (The Swiftees seem to have forgotten what search-and-destroy meant at the ground level, and seem never to have heard of My Lai, My Khe, Son Thang, the Tiger Force, the B/1/5th Marines incident, the Kerrey SEAL incident, General Ewell, the 1/27th Marines incident, the B/1/35th Infantry incident, the numerous 1/1 Cavalry incidents, etc., etc., etc., etc, etc., etc., etc.)
Anyway, I know at least one veteran who served with Kerry in Vietnam, and numerous veterans who were part of his anti-war organization, and their testimony (and the testimony to be found in memoirs, history books, and official publications) bears NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER to the feel-good, white-washing swill offered up by the Swift Boaters.
If you want gruesome details, and gruesome photos, to back up what I'm saying, we'll have to find another venue.
Anyway, read some scholarship about the village-burning, body-count-crazy conduct of the Vietnam War.... and then, to get back to the topic at hand, read some scholarship about the Nazis, at which point you guys might stop this utterly nutso linkage between Hitler and Obama.
It's ridiculous chatter like this that makes the modern-day GOP sound like the party of paranoids and know-nothings.
Enough with the Nazi B.S. already!
Sorry, but there it is!
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 12:54 AM (2iAhy)
Posted by: sunshine484848 at October 05, 2008 01:05 AM (i+DU3)
Our Student Body President was roughed up by a gang of thugs in front of dozens of witnesses, because he advocated DE-segregating Homecoming - Black leaders in the administration and faculty had spread the false rumor that the SB President was plotting to eliminate all black student groups. The student newspaper was too cowardly to condemn the attack.
At a campus meeting, a black student began his address to the group with the words "assalamu alaikum" and I reflexively responded "aleichem shalom". I was overheard, and 3 goons stood in front of me, facing me, for the rest of the meeting. A student sat next to me and grilled me about my name, address, etc. Everyone pretended not to notice.
And then there was the time Khalid Abdul Muhammad came to speak - this was years before his Kean College speech, but it was pretty much the same. Again, previously outspoken liberals fell silent.
Posted by: cincinnati kid at October 05, 2008 02:06 AM (aNA8P)
Posted by: indga at October 05, 2008 04:27 AM (RiNwE)
So, does it make it even creepier that this is likely some state agency permitting their charges to perform such a routine?
Posted by: SFC B at October 05, 2008 07:13 AM (pft8V)
"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."July 2 2008,in Colorado Springs, Co.
Posted by: CrystalD at October 05, 2008 09:33 AM (a5r62)
Posted by: Mack at October 05, 2008 09:43 AM (GAf+S)
For all the words you had posted in response to my post , you have not answered my questions . Not one word about Kerry's SF-180 or Kerry's lie about a covert Cambodian excursion that never happened . I never even mentioned his three Purple Hearts and his Silver Star because that's another can of worms against John F Kerry when the real truth comes out about his Vietnam service . You could not explain to me why the Winter Soldier defamed millions of American Vietnam service men and women who never committed those atrocities that you mentioned but for the convenience of John F Kerry's ambitions and his anti-war pals had managed to included every single veteran as a blood thirsty barbarian that needs to be stopped .
I don't know what they taught you at J-school , but from where I stand as a foreign graduate and an immigrant , your command of facts is limited by your blindness to prove that John F Kerry had done nothing wrong .
Posted by: Wil at October 05, 2008 10:31 AM (4sHuN)
I am not intimidated by uniform and the marching, but I went to two military schools, the Naval Academy and had 20 years of active duty. The cadets and midshipmen with whom I studied were kept in much better physical condition.
Richard, have you ever seen the Top Secret Swiss Drum Line? It's amazing!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7k6VYGtm8g
Posted by: arch at October 05, 2008 10:41 AM (mf5lg)
That your service was free of ugly incidents is a testament to you, your comrades, and your leadership. It does not, however, turn into liars those who say they saw ugly incidents in their units.... and, who, I have discovered, have saved for decades polaroids of they and their buddies burning hootches, manhandling villages, beating captured guerrillas, and in one instance, mutilating enemy dead (that is cutting their heads off, and posing with the heads).
I don't think Mr. Owens wants me to hijack this thread into a refight of the Swift Boat wars, so all I will say is you should be glad you were a sailor in your particular unit, and not an infantryman or marine in numerous other units I could cite where ugly incidents where the norm, not the exception.
Oh, finally, my age has nothing to do with this. I don't remember the Swiftees casting aside the support of characters like Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Michele Malkin, or Ann Coulter because they were either too young (or supposedly unhealthy) to have served in Vietnam.
Anyway, back to the topic, do you really agree with this nonsensical link between Obama and the bloody Nazis, for pete's sake?
Best Wishes,
Keith Nolan
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 11:03 AM (2iAhy)
Anyway, back to the Nazi nonsense!
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 11:08 AM (2iAhy)
Let me be blunt , I don't care what are or were your political affiliations because they are not germane to the discussion at hand . John F Kerry can easily repute the Swifties by releasing his complete SF-180 as well as having the Pentagon release the After Action Reports of a Lt John F Kerry , the commendation that earned him his Silver Star and the injury reports that earned him three Purple Hearts . You are a journalist , yes ? You can ask the Pentagon via FOIA to look at those files and see for yourself .
As for objectivity , I have my doubts because it's common knowledge that during wartime , there are soldiers who would do things that are contrary to orders or exceed those orders and ignoring those orders . In Vietnam , it takes two to tango , care to explain to me why nobody bothers to check on VC and NVA atrocities against their fellow Vietnamese and against American POWs . Heck , ask the prisoners of Hanoi Hilton about their pleasant stay .
Ask for your previous post being against search and destroy missions , hate to tell you this , it's a common tactic in war. You go out and see where the enemy is located , kill them and deny them of their resources to engage war against you , the NVA and VC did it's search it's search and destroy mission during the Vietnam War , it's called the Tet Offensive and in addition to military targets , they also killed innocent civilians who does not sympathetic to their cause . If you want to be objective , do not ignore the rest just because you suddenly found out that not all US servicemen are angels .
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 11:50 AM (4sHuN)
Burning people's homes down, and slaughtering their livestock, were not the best ways to show that America was on the the peasants' side and convince them to rally to the GVN.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 02:02 PM (2iAhy)
Again , you have not answer my original post about John Kerry . If you could not answer my original questions in regards to John Kerry and the Swifties, what's the point of your succeeding posts then ? What is the point then of raising the Swift Boats ? Is it to silence Obama's critics ?
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 03:05 PM (4sHuN)
1.) What was the net result of the search-and-destroy strategy as employed by General Westmoreland from 1965 through 1968?
2.) What exactly happened at My Lai, My Khe, and Son Thang?
3.) More importantly, WHY did it happen?
If you're serious about an exchange of ideas, I'll wait for your reply, and then try to answer your own questions.... questions, by the way, which have been answered a hundred times over to the satisfaction of all but the most locked-down Kerry haters. We're not really covering any new ground here, you know.
And, to repeat my original point, this nonsense about Obama and Hitler is just embarrassing to the GOP.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 03:52 PM (2iAhy)
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 04:00 PM (2iAhy)
Three questions , three lousy questions you refuse to answer . As a military historian , you are not in the level of Victor Davis Hanson . Answer the questions that I require and I can let this go . Comprende ??
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 04:16 PM (4sHuN)
1.) We've already got all the after-action reports related to Kerry's service, his fitness reports, and the citations and witness statements related to his two valor awards.
In addition, Kerry's personnel file was poured over by a team of reporters, who gleefully reported that the senator's college grades were not so great. But there were no bomb shells in there about dishonorable discharges or the like, one of the rumors peddled by the Swiftees.
What exactly do you think is in a personnel file? Eyewitness testimony from people who served with Kerry as to how badly he was (or was not) injured when he received his Purple Hearts, or the extent (if any) of enemy fire when he received his Bronze Star?!?!
The dirt on Kerry's service (if you want to believe there is dirt to be found) is in the memories of his fellow veterans, not a personnel file.
2.) I don't know what to make of Kerry's tale of crossing into Cambodia on Christmas of '68. Sounds like a sea story to me, an attempt to personalize the fact that, yes, illegal operations were conducted in Cambodia under both LBJ and Nixon. Was Kerry really there? I have no idea. Did U.S. units cross the border under LBJ and Nixon? Repeatedly. Did Nixon conduct an illegal bombing campaign of Cambodia that he tried to hide from the U.S. Congress? Yes.
3.) You are completely confused about the Winter Soldier testimony. I am not aware of any mass uprising of Vietnam veterans who came forward to say, no, I was in the same unit as that Winter Soldier, and none of that happened. I think ONE former Marine did dispute a Winter Soldier account at wintersoldier.com, but the issue was not a war crime, but the manner in which some casualties were evacuated during Operation Dewey Canyon in '69.
Anyway, we know the Winter Soldiers were real veterans because most brought along their discharges, plus PHOTOS of themselves in Vietnam. We also know many of their stories were true because the historical record (official histories, CID reports, the testimony of other veterans) has confirmed their stories: see, for example, the testimony of Winter Soldiers Jamie Henry, Scott Moore, Robert Kruch, Mike McCusker, Jim Umenhofer, etc., etc., etc.
Gee, satisfied?
Oh, and thanks for the insult regarding my work vs that of Victor Davis Hanson. Wasn't aware that you'd read my books. I might also point out that whatever Hanson's excellence in ancient history, his writings on Vietnam are studded with inaccuracies. For example, in one book, he refers repeatedly to the Marines liberating the Cholon section of Saigon during the Tet Offensive, even going so far to identify the actual unit involved, the 3/7th Infantry, 199th LIB, US Army, as an element of the U.S. Marine Corps!
Hanson also repeats canards about the Battle for Ben Tre (again, during Tet) that defy the contemporary and historical record, but simply come from a revisionist piece of trash called Stolen Valor by B.G. Burkett. I wouldn't hold Hanson up as some kind of Vietnam expert.
Okay, now answer my questions, or I'll stamp my feet like you and scream and shout.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 04:47 PM (2iAhy)
2) It's kind of difficult to do an illegal crossing using a Swift boat into Cambodia because a lot of military personnel would be asking too many questions and it's too obvious . If the US military wants to enter Cambodia illegally or covertly , they would use either air assets or just cross the border by walking . A gunboat ain't stealthy especially Vietnam era Swift Boats and the Mekong River was the most watched river by the Americans , Vietnamese , Cambodians and VC/NVA .
3) Why would they , Vietnam veterans in that era was marginalized into being called baby killers , drug addicts and so on and so forth . Besides , who would believe them when they were unpopular to begin with . Hell . lies about the Vietnam war are still currently ongoing .
Pity , you sounded like a kid that was ignored . Maybe someday when you really grow up , we can have a serious conversation about the place of my birth .
Posted by: Will at October 05, 2008 05:08 PM (4sHuN)
I answered your questions, now you're blowing mine off because "Pity, you sounded like a kid that was ignored. Maybe somebody when you really grow up, we can have a serious conversation about the place of my birth."
What condescending nonsense.
And what's this weird stuff from you (and Mack) about growing up? To hold a different opinion from you guys is a sign of immaturity?
Like I said: whatever, dude.
You don't know me, haven't read my work, don't really know what you're talking about, and have nothing to offer by way of argument but insults.
Seems we hijacked this thread to no real purpose.
See ya 'round.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 05:27 PM (2iAhy)
As for that video.
Those dudes are:
Creepy.
Creepy.
Three times creepy.
Posted by: brando at October 05, 2008 07:25 PM (HtuDX)
Or a "former Republican," which KN did twice... guess he wanted to make sure we caught that part of the astroturf routine.
Posted by: C-C-G at October 05, 2008 07:35 PM (fxHiG)
What else you know-nothings got?
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 07:58 PM (2iAhy)
Posted by: KBK at October 05, 2008 09:15 PM (3iYDC)
Fine. I'll explain it. It's become fashionable and predictable for those on the left to use the Fallacy of Conversion. It's a silly, non-logical argument that goes like this:
The speaker says "I used to believe in X".
This is simply a weak form of asserting expertise. The speaker is implying that he has learned about the subject, and now that he is better informed, he has rejected X. Likely paired with calling those that don't agree "know-nothings".
Everybody sees it coming a mile away, and that's why it's so funny.
Heck, I even went to a lowly state school, and I even learned about it in my Principles Of Reasoning class.
If you have an argument to make, then make it. But don't try Fallacy of Conversion and Non Sequitor, and expect folks to not laugh.
C'mon. I bet even you think that's sort of funny.
Maybe not as funny as the Obama S1Ws, but a little bit funny.
Posted by: brando at October 05, 2008 09:17 PM (HtuDX)
Posted by: Trish at October 05, 2008 09:25 PM (oX9OR)
Interestingly, two want to be architects. Even more amazing, one wants to be a chemical engineer.
So good luck to them. They have made public commitments to work hard and learn. We could and often do worse.
Posted by: Day 37, After Sarah at October 05, 2008 09:33 PM (wREmy)
My detractors argue that I am lying about having once belonged to the GOP. I think it's kinda rude to tell a stranger he's a liar based on, well, nothing. If I were to label you a believer in X, Y, and Z, when, in fact, I don't know a thing about you, you'd be free to call me a "know-nothing," too.
Anyway, the problem with your post is that I'm not basing any of my arguments on my previous membership in the GOP. My arguments stand alone, or fall alone. I only mentioned belonging to the GOP in telling that anecdote about the different reaction I got when I slapped a Democratic bumper sticker on compared to my old GOP bumber stickers.
What is your point anyway?
And, again, if you want a dialogue, make it snappy, because I'm leaving the world of computers shortly.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 10:23 PM (2iAhy)
If you can explain the overarching purpose of man's treadmill existense of war, famine, and disease, I'm all ears.
Also, please explain how religion has served the human race better than scientific advancement, and a philosophy of liberal western democracy in which religion is explicitely separated from government?
I suspect you're something of an atheist, too. I mean, you believe in whatever religion you believe in, which means you don't believe in the other couple hundred religions out there.
Anyway, you and I sound like a couple drunk philosophy students: i.e., neither profound, not fresh in our thoughts.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 10:31 PM (2iAhy)
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 10:32 PM (2iAhy)
Do you believe that JFK wrote some (or all) of the after action reports that resulted in his being awarded medals?
Posted by: RicardoVerde at October 05, 2008 10:55 PM (PBTsv)
I know the Swiftees would have us believe that Kerry wrote all the reports himself, the implication being that he so puffed up his own part as to catch the eye of his superiors and thus see that they recommended him for valor awards.
This argument falls apart on inspection. First, it implies that Kerry's superiors (Elliott, Hoffman, Zumwalt) were out-of-touch, deskbound officers (they were not) who accepted whatever piece of paper floated under their noses without actually getting out in the field and talking to their junior officers and sailors.
If Kerry was constructing elaborate fantasies on paper, his plans would have fallen apart the first time Elliott, Hoffman, or Zumwalt did what they always did: go and talk with their men about "what happened out there."
Remember, too, that in the two incidents for which Kerry was decorated for valor, numerous other personnel also received medals, each with its own corresponding witness statements.
The military was very liberal with valor awards in Vietnam, but not so liberal that an anonymous junior officer could essentially pin medals on his own chest.
In addition, though opinions are now split about the extent of enemy fire on the day Kerry received his Bronze Star (some who were there remember only mine explosions; others, including some who detest Kerry for his anti-war activities, recall mines and AK-47 fire), no one who was present when Kerry earned his Silver Star has disputed the basic facts of what happened that day in February of '69.
At least, that's my take on the situation.
Posted by: KeithNolan at October 05, 2008 11:11 PM (2iAhy)
My take on the situation is that those guys can hear the drummer get wicked.
Posted by: brando at October 05, 2008 11:27 PM (HtuDX)
Posted by: Bandit at October 06, 2008 07:28 AM (/R+6i)
Indeed.
What's most logically inconsistent about atheism is that in order to be a "true" atheist, you'd have to know with absolute certainty that at no time, past, present, or future, at any point in the universe, out to the farthest reaches, has there ever been or will there ever be a god. If you knew all that, well... you'd be a god.
Agnosticism is at least logically consistent.
Posted by: C-C-G at October 06, 2008 07:50 AM (fxHiG)
Posted by: Trish at October 06, 2008 10:34 AM (oX9OR)
Posted by: brando at October 06, 2008 12:30 PM (qzOby)
That's "Alpha Psi Omega" you're referring to.
Posted by: Granddaddy long Legs at October 06, 2008 01:25 PM (Y9fG5)
Posted by: brando at October 06, 2008 04:31 PM (qzOby)
Posted by: Dan at October 07, 2008 01:26 AM (wh08x)
Posted by: RuztyB at October 07, 2008 09:58 AM (+Fsm5)
Posted by: RuztyB at October 07, 2008 10:08 AM (+Fsm5)
RuztyB, I think you're more than a little arrogant in professing to know the mind of Jesus. Somehow, I doubt he speaks to you directly.
I also find your racism more than a little annoying.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at October 07, 2008 10:15 AM (HcgFD)
Posted by: RuztyB at October 07, 2008 10:57 AM (+Fsm5)
Posted by: RuztyB at October 07, 2008 11:20 AM (+Fsm5)
You act as if Jesus died 1970 years ago with everything he knew said, or all that he would know for all time captured on paper during his short 30 years of human life, and without comprehending that as part of the Trinity, he is part of the same God that waged war in Heaven and on Earth in that same Bible. Again... unbelievably arrogant.
You, sir are the one who first began casting slurs, everyone who disagreed with you "Texas rednecks," implying they were racists, without knowing the first thing about them.
As for the name of the blog, my ignorant, racist friend, you could have clicked on the "About" link to find out what it was named, but it apparent that it is far easier for you to label others instead of think.
Your biblical education is as under-served as your secular education, sir, and frankly, I have better things to do than spend any more time in this discussion.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at October 07, 2008 11:38 AM (HcgFD)
I just love all these "conservative Christian" astroturfers and their nonsense. Axelrod's not getting his money's worth from Rutzy-boy, that's for sure.
Rutzy's so pro life that he's carrying water for the most extreme pro-abortion candidate in history. Riiight. I don't mind the lying any more because it comes naturally to 0bama-supporters; after all, it's what their messiah does all the time. I just wish they'd take the trouble to be more clever about it.
Posted by: Nine-of-Diamonds at October 07, 2008 07:44 PM (1aw/n)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0264 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0142 seconds, 82 records returned.
Page size 60 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.