The Fort Dix Terror Plot
A man who is a 21-year associate, business partner, fellow board member, and political supporter of the Democratic nominee for President led an organization that came within hours of carrying out the most deadly terrorist attack in American history prior to Timothy McVeigh's attack in Oklahoma City.
It's about time we talk about that.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:10 PM
Comments
Posted by: Big Country at September 28, 2008 12:23 PM (niydV)
That should come out in the middle of Obama's second term when he is starting the lame duck phase.
That way, it won't hurt the party's chances to pass meaningful bills through Congress and make necessary changes.
But, if we bring it up near the end of his tenure, the next nominee of the party can use it to distance themselves from him and be a champion of patriots.
[me wearing my DKos hat]
Posted by: usinkorea at September 28, 2008 12:27 PM (4AcJL)
Posted by: Zhombre at September 28, 2008 12:48 PM (8owxX)
That would certainly be more helpful to Michelle's children!
Posted by: Gary Rosen at September 28, 2008 05:43 PM (sHuCu)
That sounds even less important than the hacker who broke into Palin's account; all the suppression of free speech by Obamist thugs; Obama's ultra-pro-choice (even post-birth) position; Obama's anti-2nd amendment views; Obama's radical opposition to the U.S. military; etc...
Unlikely to ever become part of the firmly controlled national conversation, unless we have a revolution in the media...
Perhaps we (conservatives) should spend the next couple of years raising funds to purchase NBC from GE...
Posted by: Clint at September 28, 2008 06:36 PM (oZ5OG)
A lame duck is a politician who has LOST an election, but is serving out the few remaining months of his term. A president who has been elected to a second term is NEVER a lame duck.
Posted by: Trish at September 28, 2008 11:02 PM (Gjk92)
You noted, "Update: ABC is also censoring comments on the blog (mine, among others) for content that is anything other than profane, simply rewriting or deleting comments they do not like on apparent whims. The former gatekeepers do not like to be told that they are wrong."
ABC is back up to its old tricks.
Story at Gateway Pundit.
Posted by: Looking Glass at September 29, 2008 02:41 AM (p7VR5)
"It is really pathetic. Not only is the mainstream media not reporting crucial facts for this election, they are affirmatively patrolling their own user comments to remove material detrimental to the chosen one ... Barack Obama. This sort of nonsense is not fitting the fair reporting done by Jake Tapper so far during this presidential campaign."
Jake Tapper, a/the blogger at Political Punch, apparently comments at BH. [You'll have to go to Brutally Honest to read it. For some reason when I quote his comment here it gets flagged as 'questionable content.']
Posted by: Looking Glass at September 29, 2008 04:54 AM (p7VR5)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0096 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0074 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 7 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.