Code Pink Founder: "I Wouldn't Characterize Anybody Who Fought in Vietnam As A War Hero."
This quote was from Medea Benjamin, co-founder of Code Pink, an organization that gave $600,000 in cash and supplies in "humanitarian aide" to an insurgent-controlled Fallujah several years ago in our current war (the Marines won anyway, which is perhaps why Code Pink is leading the assault against the Marines in Berkeley).
That is just one toxic outburst is a collection of indefensible comments from the radical fringe of the Democratic Party laughably called "progressives" in a series of personal attacks levied at Presidential candidate John McCain and chronicled by Ben Smith in a Politico article. Prominent progressive blogger John Aravosis attacked McCain for breaking under brutal torture in North Vietnamese prisons, and labeled the unwilling use of McCain in a North Vietnamese propaganda film as "disloyalty." Tellingly, Aravosis has never uttered similar words of disapproval against Jane Fonda, who willingly and famously posed for propaganda photos on North Vietnamese antiaircraft guns that were used to shoot at American pilots like McCain. Other angry souls associated with MoveOn.org, CounterPunch, the Huffington Post, and Mother Jones also have expressed interest in attacking McCain's military record. Democrat Wesley Clark—notable for his scarcity of support in the military, notes fighter pilot Lex—also attacked McCain's military experience as an example of poor leadership experience, without, or course, expressing how Obama's thin resume has prepared him to lead anything as consequential as a Cub Scout Troop. We've known that Barack Obama's base among the radical fringe would bring out some long-seated uglinesses in part of the Democratic Party that makes up his base, but I don't think that anyone could have expected it would come out this soon, this hard, this transparently.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:13 AM
Comments
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at June 30, 2008 10:56 AM (kNqJV)
I notice you're not answering what Clark said about McCain.
"We've known that Barack Obama's base among the radical fringe would bring out some long-seated uglinesses in part of the Democratic Party that makes up his base"
Sure, a general is part of the "radical fringe." And do you want to say "base" again?
Posted by: Kyle1 at June 30, 2008 11:02 AM (GLk0P)
Posted by: Kyle1 at June 30, 2008 11:04 AM (GLk0P)
Okay, dopes. Over and out.
Posted by: Kyle1 at June 30, 2008 11:05 AM (GLk0P)
Using Obama's standard, does this make Wes Clark large and/or brave ?
Posted by: Neo at June 30, 2008 11:19 AM (Yozw9)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at June 30, 2008 11:49 AM (kNqJV)
Posted by: Bandit at June 30, 2008 12:35 PM (D3sAj)
Hey Kyle I see you've set aside this special time to humiliate yourself in public.
Posted by: Huntress at June 30, 2008 01:10 PM (Qn9iF)
So you still adhere to the "Swift Boater" view on Kerry. How about both sides admitting that these men served the United States in armed conflict with honor. Unfortunately they were not commanders like Ike or Grant. These men had much larger responsibilities.
I debate Kerry's and McCain's qualifications for SCOTUS based on their specific military service.
Posted by: muffler at June 30, 2008 01:12 PM (DZmDA)
Kerry, on the other hand chose to get out of Vietnam as soon as a loophole let him. Both men served honorably, but McCain was a hero while Kerry was not.
Posted by: James at June 30, 2008 01:35 PM (hZDqQ)
Posted by: Bill Smith at June 30, 2008 01:37 PM (IE/I+)
Either the Winter Soldier statements are true or they are not. If they are true, then the events would be described in his SF-180 (which he has promised to release but has not) and would not be consistent with his "Silver Star" service. (Consistent with beliefs of the Swift Boat personnel). If the Winter Soldier events are not true, then he is willing to disgrace his fellow soldiers, and his story is not consistent with "Silver Star" service. Of course, if he would release his records--no problem. If he does not, while not proof of status, it sure sets up a nasty adverse inference agaisnt him
Posted by: Steve at June 30, 2008 03:31 PM (pzFzt)
Posted by: Howard at June 30, 2008 04:48 PM (I3M5G)
Strangely, he was not present at the vote in the Senate to denounce that ad.
What's even weirder was that just prior to that vote, he voted for a weak Barbara Boxer-led measure.
In other words, he scurried from the room in order to avoid a vote which, either way, could be held against him.
Yeah, that's real leadership, Senator Obama.
Posted by: C-C-G at June 30, 2008 05:01 PM (Hc4y8)
Posted by: Chris at July 01, 2008 11:10 AM (ceOV5)
Posted by: megapotamus at July 01, 2008 11:21 AM (LF+qW)
I think that should be "Aravoses", no? Or perhaps "Aravosi"?
Posted by: Stoutcat at July 01, 2008 01:25 PM (kKdtK)
In short, what qualifies a Democrat doesn't qualify a Republican, according to General Clark.
Typical lefty double-standard.
Posted by: C-C-G at July 01, 2008 08:38 PM (n8vfc)
Posted by: daveP. at July 01, 2008 11:05 PM (q6tuN)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0063 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0036 seconds, 27 records returned.
Page size 15 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.