al Sadr Crafting an Iraqi Hezbollah?
Via email from a trusted source, a VOI account. It looks like al Sadr is going to continue his Iranian-backed insurrection against the Iraqi government:
If true—and apparently, it is—al Sadr is attempting to split and sanction a military wing off of the Madhi Army and Iranian "Special groups" to continue insurgent operations, while making at least a face-value attempt to demilitarize the organization. Intresting, isn't it? Iran tried to infiltrate Iraqi government at all levels, along with militia groups and criminal gangs. Obviously, as PM Maliki's clearing out of Sadrists from Baghdad to Basra proved, the government route has failed, and the militia route is on the ropes. As a result, al Sadr is apparently attempting to craft an Iraqi Hezbollah, entrenching his group socially as an Iranian-supported shadow government with it's own insurgent military wing. Iraq's security forces and government are far less fractured than those in Lebanon, so it seems unlikely that al Sadr's hopes will come to fruition, but the development does raise an interesting question, namely: is this the best Iran has left?
The anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada
al-Sadr on Friday expressed intention to authorize setting up "cells
to resist the occupation", head of the political bureau of Sadr's
Movement said. "The declaration by Sayyed Muqtada al-Sadr to form cells to resist the
occupation comes in full conformity with the approach of the
Sadrists," Sheikh Liwa Semaysam told Aswat al-Iraq- Voices of Iraq-
(VOI) on the phone. The key Sadrist leader added that these cells will "have a written
authorization by Sayyed Muqtada al-Sadr to carry out their task, on
the condition that arms will only be in their hands for use against
the occupier and none else." Sheikh Semaysam, a close aide of Sadr, provided no further details.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 11:45 AM
Comments
Posted by: grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr at June 13, 2008 12:36 PM (gkobM)
Posted by: C-C-G at June 13, 2008 06:16 PM (X5vKa)
Posted by: Gator at June 13, 2008 08:04 PM (uaTZE)
Posted by: Scrapiron at June 13, 2008 08:21 PM (I4yBD)
Posted by: Big Country at June 13, 2008 09:22 PM (niydV)
Posted by: C-C-G at June 13, 2008 09:34 PM (X5vKa)
Posted by: cactus at June 15, 2008 06:07 AM (l3Fio)
Because it is, in fact, about pliability. Malaki (being in power through force of US arms) is compliant, if irritating. Sadr would be wholly in opposition to US goals. The old colonial game of demonise the nationalist is at play once more.
Actual reality is pretty much irrelevant, we are talking PR here.
Posted by: Rafar at June 16, 2008 08:39 AM (ej9g/)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0088 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0067 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 7 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.