But They Support the Troops
Michael Yon emailed early this morning to warn me American soldiers are being given a travel warning by the federal government.
The sad part? It isn't overseas, but related to what are now only verbal assaults on the Washington, D.C. metro.It sounds like we've got a few disciples of the William Ayers/Bernadine Dohrn wing of the Democrat Party still active. Fringe leftists haven't murdered uniformed government officials since 2002 in anti-war, anti-government violence, but it is an election year, and tensions are already running high.
Recently, there have been local incidents in which military personnel have been verbally assaulted while commuting on the Metro. Uniformed members have been approached by individuals expressing themselves as anti-government, shouting anti-war sentiments, and using racial slurs against minorities.
This isn't the kind of "hope" and "change" I think most of us expected. 5/27 Update: This one is for those authors and moderators of blog entries at the Village Voice, as they don't seem willing to correct misinformation they spread even after being contacted by both Michael Yon and myself. Despite their assertions to the contrary, I went to great lengths to correct this story, spurred on by Yon. I not only wrote the Pajamas Media article debunking the substance of this claim; I also wrote a separate article for this very blog, though I didn't update this particular post, because at that point, this post was old news pushed well down the digital page. Perhaps I should have done so. That doesn't excuse Edroso's laziness and unwillingness to actually read the blogs he claims to for the Voice, or for their unwillingness to publish my response to them as of 5:47 PM today.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 08:38 AM
Comments
Posted by: David M at May 21, 2008 10:28 AM (gIAM9)
I hope other passengers come to the defence of the troops.
Posted by: davod at May 21, 2008 11:18 AM (llh3A)
That's wrong. Whatever happened to 'millions for defense, and not one cent for tribute'?
Hiding out in civvies is a form of appeasement. Will the dear little lefties like us better if we look more like them?
Joe Lieberman nailed it yesterday, with a surprising quote from none other than Dean Acheson: "No people in history have ever survived, who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies".
And that goes in spades to our military personnel, who will never make themselves inoffensive to our domestic enemies by hiding out of uniform. Better to confront the beast in the open, and make public the savage behavior of the anti-American goons (whose parents were the ones spitting on returning Viet Nam vets, and who never were properly called to account).
And maybe, indeed, someone will step out of the crowd and forthrightly shorten the proboscis of one or more of the uniform-attackers. We can only hope.
Posted by: Micropotamus at May 21, 2008 01:11 PM (YeWPs)
When I hear stories like this post, it angers me to my very core.
Posted by: Sara at May 21, 2008 02:00 PM (Wi/N0)
I earned a MA with thesis and nine hours toward a PHD in four semesters. When a job counselor told a Navy friend and me we needed to hide our military past if we wanted good employment, I dropped out and farmed. Sad to say some of those grad students grew up to become college professors who warp our children's minds.
Posted by: James at May 21, 2008 02:54 PM (7Plbe)
Posted by: Jonn Lilyea at May 21, 2008 05:15 PM (H9PcE)
Posted by: Tonto (USA) at May 21, 2008 07:32 PM (GAL+4)
Posted by: C-C-G at May 21, 2008 07:45 PM (ub+LC)
I'd rather them have to put up with a few minutes of obnoxious behavior by a total jerk than have them wreck their careers by acting out.
I didn't say it was right, I just said that's what will happen.
Posted by: DaveP. at May 21, 2008 08:47 PM (3Aj1g)
Posted by: C-C-G at May 21, 2008 10:48 PM (WLr2t)
I filed that in the memory banks.
Posted by: brando at May 21, 2008 11:14 PM (LXoqQ)
Posted by: Mark at May 22, 2008 10:48 AM (4od5C)
Wonder how many hippies I can fit into one of them there garbage cans/recycle bins? It'll be reeeeeaaally interesting to see.
Posted by: Big Country at May 22, 2008 02:54 PM (niydV)
Posted by: C-C-G at May 22, 2008 05:51 PM (WLr2t)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at May 22, 2008 07:04 PM (TUWci)
Posted by: Mark at May 22, 2008 07:52 PM (KDHro)
Just as not one soldier was spat upon by hippies during/after Vietnam. It's all a myth.
How do I know? Profs tell me so:
http://www.amazon.com/Spitting-Image-Memory-Legacy-Vietnam/dp/0814751474
So, when you read about it happening today, understand that it's not really happening. And if it is, pace Jerry Lembcke, it's actually conservatives doing it, out of disrespect for the troops (for not having won).
Of course, it's all in the definitions. Apparently, somewhere along the line, Lembcke concluded that if there weren't ENOUGH stories in the press, and no film of soldiers/sailors/Marines/airmen being spat upon, it didn't happen. And if it didn't happen to every soldier/sailor/Marine/airmen, then the whole thing is an "urban legend," made up in the aftermath by conservatives.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/04/30/debunking_a_spitting_image/
And, yes, Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia.
Posted by: Lurking Observer at May 22, 2008 08:10 PM (9Dnrq)
Posted by: Mark at May 23, 2008 02:57 PM (4od5C)
Posted by: Eric at May 24, 2008 05:45 PM (9V6Vj)
Posted by: rapid at May 27, 2008 03:18 PM (oEV28)
so where's the correction bob? you figured it out in pm, why not update here?
I did, slick. Folks don't often read updates pushed well down the page, so I made an entirely new post out of it and emailed dozens of bloggers on the subject. I'll post a link here as a formality, but as I've posted now two additional articles on the subject, I'm not sure I see what good it will do.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at May 27, 2008 04:36 PM (HcgFD)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.024 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0201 seconds, 29 records returned.
Page size 16 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.