MSNBC Games McCain Speech with Irrelevant "Breaking News"
As has sadly become commonplace, Amanda at Think Progress missed another story today, even though this one slapped her right between the eyes.
Her post, McCain's Speech On Progress In Iraq Interrupted By News Of Mortars Hitting The Green Zone, notes that MSNBC interrupted a John McCain speech about progress being made in the Iraq War with the breaking news story that four mortar shells hit Baghdad's Green Zone, an unremarkable development as Sadrists and insurgents have used mortars for harassment and interdiction (H&I) fires frequently throughout the war, usually to little effect. There were no known casualties at the time the story was reported, and there was no known targets of importance hit. What Amanda did not grasp is the utter lack of a legitimate reason for MSNBC producers to break into McCain's speech, other than to try to undermine his message. MSNBC needs to justify this "breaking news" event by proving that they have broken into other live events on their network to cover minor Green Zone mortar attacks during the campaign season. Somehow, I doubt they can.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 01:42 PM
Comments
The reporter looking for the big story that finally, finally gets Bush - the story Chimpy McHitlerBurton cannot escape - that reporter is facing an increasing threat of starvation. 10 months and counting down. Time is running out. The animal must leave cover. The press must dispense with even the pretense of objectivity and go out into the open. I predict more and more recklessly open bias in reporting between now and January. They're getting hungrier and hungrier. They're staring starvation right in the eye...
Posted by: Hyperpotamus at April 07, 2008 08:13 PM (STkWr)
In the best tradition of Chinese businessmen everywhere, I will now steal your words and use them as my own.
Actually I simply plan on saving your post in Notepad form because it's cool and RIGHT ON THE MONEY.
Posted by: Pillbox at April 07, 2008 08:49 PM (MQVqX)
Posted by: Kevin Baker at April 07, 2008 10:20 PM (apIl/)
Posted by: sherlock at April 07, 2008 10:24 PM (ojW85)
Posted by: P Kovchok at April 07, 2008 10:31 PM (9cpAC)
It has to keep attention off Rev. G D AmeriKKKa. It will have to cover up rioting at the D convention in Denver and the R convention in St. Paul (if the guys rioting at the D job can get out on bail in time). And it will have to cover up for BHO's inability to think on his feet or mouth anything but platitudes.
Hungry? They are starving.
Plus you hear the rumors. Reporters on the McCain bus are having fun. On the BO bus not so much.
Posted by: M. Simon at April 08, 2008 12:10 AM (+oI3L)
"[2004] was the year when it finally became unmistakably clear that objectivity has outlived its usefulness as an ethical touchstone for journalism."
- Geneva Overholser (Hartford Courant) justifying partisan journalism
As usual, we can turn for real insight to Orwell. Until recently I falsely believed that the Ministry of Truth was modeled after TASS and Pravda. Not at all. The inspiration came from the BBC and the British press:
" . . . and I saw newspapers... retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various 'party lines'... This kind of thing is frightening to me, because it often gives me the feeling that the very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. "
- Orwell
Posted by: William White at April 08, 2008 12:36 AM (mSX6M)
Unfortunately some do not like the choices that Americans make in their news sources.
Posted by: John Ryan at April 08, 2008 06:42 AM (TcoRJ)
What we're talking about is "truth in advertising," or perhaps "truth in labeling" would be more accurate. If you're going to label something "news," it needs to be unbiased--just like something labeled "milk" had better not contain orange juice.
What you appear to be defending is putting orange juice (opinion) in a container labeled "milk" (news). Are you sure you wanna do that?
Posted by: C-C-G at April 08, 2008 08:31 AM (5m1ld)
Posted by: Bill Smith at April 08, 2008 08:40 AM (Up4Is)
Posted by: Dave Dudley at April 08, 2008 10:48 AM (MdmUg)
Posted by: megapotamus at April 08, 2008 11:54 AM (LF+qW)
Posted by: Micropotamus at April 08, 2008 12:12 PM (YeWPs)
Posted by: David M at April 08, 2008 12:44 PM (gIAM9)
Posted by: Thud at April 08, 2008 04:58 PM (CqkCY)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0139 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.011 seconds, 23 records returned.
Page size 13 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.