Media Still Trying to Martyr Obama
We've covered this ground before. For reasons they will not openly disclose, media worldwide are hooked on the possibility that Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama will be assassinated.
As noted by Mark Finkelstein this morning on Newsbusters, Early Show anchor Harry Smith broached the subject again in a conversation with Senator Ted Kennedy:I'll send you over to the Newsbusters post to see how Kennedy responded, but after you read that, ask yourself this: What basis did Harry Smith have for making his remarks? Such vague media assertions of a possible targeting of Obama have been occurring for over a year, and yet, when we actually look for evidence of such claims, they seem to have little or no merit other than other media accounts. I've no doubt that somewhere in the world there are those that would rather see Barack Obama dead than President, but the media has failed, in each an every instance, to provide support for this apparently evergreen claim. They recycle the charge, again and again, merely by "knowing" that someone must hate him. I know that I am certainly getting tired of their attempts to assert a mortal threat against one of the more likable people (politics aside) in this race, and wonder why more bloggers have not yet castigated the media for recycling the possibility of a threat again and again, perhaps goading an unstable person to act upon them. This needs to stop.
Kennedy understandably had no idea what Smith was driving at, and gave an innocuous answer about people's desire for "a new day and a new generation." But Smith's follow-up left no real doubt as to what he had in mind.
HARRY SMITH: When you see that enthusiasm [for Obama] though, and when you see the generational change that seems to be taking place before our eyes, does it make you at all fearful?
When you tell a man with Ted Kennedy's family history that "you well know" about politicians becoming "targets," the implication is unmistakable.
SMITH: I just, I think what I was trying to say is, sometimes agents of change end of being targets, as you well know, and that was why I was asking if you were at all fearful of that.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:44 AM
Comments
Posted by: buzz at January 29, 2008 01:44 PM (kwhut)
Posted by: g edward at January 29, 2008 01:44 PM (EVMYf)
like Kennedy and Reagan, but on the other hand even total zeros like Ford and Carter got shot at.
President is a high risk job no matter who holds it. This is total BS.
As to where the press gets it from... doesn't Barack's wife Michelle keep talking about it?
Posted by: Ralph Phelan at January 29, 2008 01:46 PM (kwxFs)
Posted by: JBH at January 29, 2008 01:50 PM (Z5UJ3)
Posted by: Bo McIlvain at January 29, 2008 01:56 PM (1ywOE)
Posted by: DirtCrashr at January 29, 2008 02:02 PM (VNM5w)
These "warnings" are deliberate.
Posted by: David Preiser at January 29, 2008 02:03 PM (YFe2d)
The same folks who wish they could been there for the Vietnam protests secretly wish they could experience some national, soul-searing event like a Kennedy (or Kennedy, or King) assassination happen in their lifetime.
For such folks, Obama is perfect. And that answers the commenter who asked about Bush/Cheney - obviously, to this special type of imagination, someone whacking either of those two would not transport us back to the glorious 60's.
Just popped into my head, but I like it.
Posted by: Tom Maguire at January 29, 2008 02:08 PM (dEg0I)
Posted by: A.S. at January 29, 2008 02:09 PM (1Isqt)
Posted by: rastajenk at January 29, 2008 02:12 PM (xs/uP)
It's like an early line in the original season of 24. Bauer starts looking into concerns for the then-senator, and someone says, "they'll say you are doing it because he is black."
And Bauer responds, "it IS because he is black. He is much more likely to be a target."
I'm an optimist when it comes to American race relations, but Bauer is right.
Posted by: A.W. at January 29, 2008 02:22 PM (vwIci)
Posted by: Ross at January 29, 2008 02:24 PM (ZrS0c)
Posted by: Thomas at January 29, 2008 02:29 PM (dTkSx)
Uh... there was one in their lifetime....I'm sure you remember the events of September 11, 2001.
Posted by: Jacknut at January 29, 2008 02:32 PM (MiA5i)
C'mon. Republicans are EVIL. EEEEVVVVVIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLL.
Seriously, most conservatives just think liberals are misguided. However, most liberals think conservatives are bad people. Of course they'd kill a black president. That's they kind of stuff they do....
ChimpyMcHitlerHalliburton!!!!!!
Posted by: Tom at January 29, 2008 02:33 PM (T0uPR)
Posted by: Mike O at January 29, 2008 02:37 PM (MU302)
Posted by: Old Grouch at January 29, 2008 02:40 PM (f4kkX)
If there is a real threat to Obama's life it isn't racists, and it goes away once the nomination is divided. Where would this threat come from?
Hint #1: Jim MacDougal
Hint #2: Vince Foster
Yeah, this is tin-foil-hat territory, but at least it has some basis in fact and/or legend, unlike the "racist assassissin" speculation which is based on ... what exactly?
Posted by: Ralph Phelan at January 29, 2008 02:42 PM (kwxFs)
Posted by: Mary in LA at January 29, 2008 02:42 PM (JYxmy)
Posted by: Seerak at January 29, 2008 02:44 PM (n7AjT)
Posted by: the anchoress at January 29, 2008 03:01 PM (N0hv7)
It's funny that the same people who tell you that the "terrorist Muslim threat" is just a fake scare-tactic by the Republicans will then turn around and tell you that White Racist Conservatives are probably planning to shoot Obama. We don't know who or where they are, but they are Out There.
Posted by: DensityDuck at January 29, 2008 03:03 PM (kC3nL)
That was the working assumption at first. It was shown to be false. Sen. Palmer was not a target because of his race.
Posted by: soccer dad at January 29, 2008 03:14 PM (WnKir)
I think I can clarify their reasons. Here is what the journalists are really saying:
"If it looks like he can win, Obama might be assassinated. Wouldn't that be AWESOME? Our circulation figures and ratings would go through the ROOF! . . . Oops, did I say 'awesome'? Sorry, I meant 'terrible'. Wouldn't that be TERRIBLE?"
Posted by: Pat at January 29, 2008 03:15 PM (0suEp)
Posted by: JorgXMcKie at January 29, 2008 03:36 PM (OIFDa)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at January 29, 2008 03:41 PM (Lgw9b)
Posted by: Korla Pundit at January 29, 2008 03:56 PM (FHlAi)
Posted by: Korla Pundit at January 29, 2008 03:57 PM (FHlAi)
Someone at Kos would discover that said Muslim nutcase had once voted on a Diebold machine and connect the dots, concluding inevitably that the assassination had been conducted by "neocons." Two weeks later it would be considered common knowledge in the lefty Blogosphere. Congressional hearings would follow.
Posted by: smaack at January 29, 2008 03:59 PM (PUPtw)
Posted by: smaack at January 29, 2008 04:02 PM (PUPtw)
Posted by: Hogtrashhd at January 29, 2008 04:09 PM (5Z442)
Posted by: Tucson Tarheel at January 29, 2008 04:10 PM (L2mPa)
Posted by: DaveP. at January 29, 2008 04:20 PM (q6tuN)
Posted by: Klug at January 29, 2008 04:50 PM (Of/27)
Posted by: DirtCrashr at January 29, 2008 05:52 PM (VNM5w)
Posted by: C-C-G at January 29, 2008 06:07 PM (016Rv)
Posted by: Will at January 29, 2008 06:27 PM (XWS6z)
Posted by: Peter at January 29, 2008 06:30 PM (d/RyS)
Read what they said about Obama at this anti-Jena 6, anti-MLK Day march, where they chanted, "If it ain't white, it ain't right."
One member of the Nationalist Party used a noose as a leash for walking his dog. David Dupre of Tioga, La., displayed a .22-caliber revolver in the left-breast pocket of his military fatigue jacket, and a noose dangled off a knife strapped to his right leg. His son David Jr., meanwhile, entertained questions on the presidential race. Asked by the Intelligence Report what would he thought would happen if Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) were elected, the younger Dupre didn’t hesitate. “He’d catch a bullet. He’d get picked off before he’d even take the oath” because “he’s tied to the Arabs and the Muslims” and “Saddam Hussein wants him in office.” Both father and son were armed with “street sweeper” shotguns until Jena Police Chief Paul Smith told them he wouldn’t allow them to march unless they left the 12-gauge weapons in their vehicle, according to The Associated Press.
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/01/23/no-king-just-jesters-in-jena/
Posted by: john doe at January 29, 2008 06:45 PM (JF2MH)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18474444/
Posted by: j-lil at January 29, 2008 07:18 PM (0yZl8)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 29, 2008 07:58 PM (ERV3B)
1- The perp's background and political beliefs would simply disappear down the memory hole, just like Sirhan's and Oswald's did. Check question: In all of your years, do you remember anyone in journalism or in academia actually pointing out that Oswald was a pro-Castro Communist or that Sirhan was an Arab nationalist? I have actually heard the Kennedy assassination blamed on Republicans...
2- There would be an immediate call for a total ban on handguns, no matter how the assassination took place and no matter if the hitter was actually a member of the Brady organization. The cry would be, "No More Obamas!" and it would start before the body had even been placed on a stretcher.
Posted by: DaveP. at January 29, 2008 10:10 PM (1AZTv)
But I'm sure another reason is that it fits the narrative of an America still torn by its irredeemably racist past. To fit the narrative, it'd be a tragedy but it should happen, to be right. In fact, it needs to happen, otherwise their worldview trembles.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at January 29, 2008 10:59 PM (1ii59)
Posted by: Pablo at January 29, 2008 11:58 PM (yTndK)
Posted by: Scrapiron at January 30, 2008 12:00 AM (AiJXe)
Posted by: Scrapiron at January 30, 2008 12:03 AM (AiJXe)
Posted by: bigdogdaddy at January 30, 2008 08:57 AM (nX3lF)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0173 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0104 seconds, 55 records returned.
Page size 27 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.