Send in the Emoting Clown
Oh, Erica Jong, could you be any more of an argument against Hillary Clinton if you tried?
This not so-subtle plaintive wail in support of Hillary Clinton, full of high drama and lacking in substance, is perhaps precisely the reason we shouldn't elect a feminist of Jong's generation President. Unable to rationally argue from an intellectual position on why the former First Lady has the experience, integrity, or policy positions to warrant her ascension, Jong instead insists that merely being female is reason enough to be President. Is this the best argument that she can put forth, that a woman should be elected because of her gender, not because she has superior talents or ideas?
I am so tired of pink men bombing brown children and rationalizing it as fighting terrorism. I am so tired of pink men telling women (of all colors) what to do with their wombs--which connect with their brains--in case you forgot. I am so tired of pink men telling us we should stay in Iraq for generations. I am so tired of pink men buying bombs and cheating schools. I am so tired of pink men having wives who stand behind them and nod sagely on television. I am so tired of pink men expecting that someone--a brown, black, yellow or white woman--will trail behind them changing light bulbs, taking out garbage, washing laundry, keeping food in the house, taking care of kids of all ages, of parents of all ages. I am so tired of pink men whose wives double or triple the family income thinking they can spend it without doing a damn thing at home. I am so tired...
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 02:04 PM
Comments
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at January 14, 2008 02:42 PM (Lgw9b)
Posted by: George Bruce at January 14, 2008 02:43 PM (tj2NC)
Posted by: DaveP. at January 14, 2008 02:59 PM (1AZTv)
With identity politics, each candidate plays the hand they are born with, they have no choices. So Edwards throws the Class card. Hillary counters by playing the Gender card. Obama is now attempting to trump with the Race card. Maybe Edwards will come back with a Hair card. Who knows?
I, however, prefer ideas. Debate and argument over policies and issues attempting to persuade the voter, not just "identify" with them. These people are either not bright enough to defend their positions, or don't actually believe the bilge they are pumping, or think we're too stupid to notice or understand.
And our supposed defenders, the MSM, are either unwilling to challenge these candidates through fear or personal bias, or they're just dumber than a box of rocks.
For those willing to find out for themselves, fortunately we have bloggers who not only report and investigate but provide cites to back up their info.
To paraphrase Patrick Henry, "Give me blogging or give me death".
Posted by: thenakedemperor at January 14, 2008 03:33 PM (1RIcI)
Posted by: amr at January 14, 2008 03:54 PM (AiJXe)
Posted by: Jonn Lilyea at January 14, 2008 06:04 PM (Pkb13)
Posted by: Sara at January 14, 2008 06:05 PM (Wi/N0)
It is depressingly common thinking among younger women.
I was having dinner with some of my more liberal friends a month or so ago, and politics came up. I asked for a reason to vote for Hillary. The only ones put forth were 1) she's be getting advice from Bill, and 2) she's a woman.
There are people think that's enough. I hope there aren't many of them, tho.
Posted by: rosignol at January 14, 2008 08:08 PM (jpBGs)
I suspect not. Erica's gushing is probably limited to females of one party and one ideology only.
Posted by: C-C-G at January 14, 2008 10:59 PM (F+vKR)
Posted by: Mark in Portland at January 15, 2008 12:45 PM (+45yf)
Posted by: Dusty at January 15, 2008 12:48 PM (GJLeQ)
Posted by: Mockin'bird at January 15, 2008 04:58 PM (whgfR)
Posted by: pst314 at January 16, 2008 11:39 AM (OA547)
Posted by: SicSemperTyrannus at January 17, 2008 11:28 AM (Mv/2X)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0072 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0044 seconds, 22 records returned.
Page size 10 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.