Jay R. Grodner, A Chicago Lawyer You Should Know
Jay R. Grodner is a Chicago lawyer who apparently believes it is perfectly acceptable to vandalize a deploying Marine's car because of his own anti-war political beliefs.
Of course, the best way to handle the situation is by letting the authorities do their jobs, and commenter "Mo" at Blackfive has the excellent idea of contacting the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission: One Prudential Plaza130 East Randolph Drive
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60601-6219
(312) 565-2600 or, within
Illinois, (800) 826-8625
Fax (312) 565-2320 One North Old Capitol Plaza
Suite 333
Springfield, IL 62701-1625
(217) 522-6838 or, within
Illinois, (800) 252-8048
Fax (217) 522-2417 It would seem that committing felony vandalism is a decent reason to have his license to practice law revoked. The post also cites a police report that Grodner also apparently tried to state that the Marine only accosted him because he's Jewish (implying the Marine is a bigot). Stay classy, Jay R. Grodner, Chicago attorney. Bonus: He's already a big hit on Google. I hope he enjoys the free advertising. He's earned it.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 12:14 PM
Comments
Posted by: C-C-G at December 31, 2007 08:58 PM (ojkss)
Posted by: Foxfier at January 01, 2008 11:52 AM (D/3gQ)
Simple fact: the Marine was a douche for backing down a one-way, but certainly didn't deserve anything more than a "hey, obey the traffic laws!" yell. Of course the lawyer guy reacted in a criminal way. If it had been me that he had seen, he would have said "You think that just because you're tall, intelligent, and incredibly handsome, you can do whatever you want." To assume that he only did it because of the military plates is quite short-sighted and conspiracy-minded.
Posted by: Book Learned Guy at January 01, 2008 05:57 PM (+Dl24)
Without such data being provided, the conclusion that the Marine's Department of Defense license plates were a primary reason that Mr. Grodner picked his car to key is valid.
Also, if you'd read the B5 article that CY linked to, you'd know that the Marine reports that Mr. Grodner said, "you think you can do whatever you want with Department of Defense license plates and tags." That statement, if true, is also strong evidence for the conclusion that Mr. Grodner's anti-war feelings were a motivating factor in choosing to vandalize a Marine's car.
Good day, sir. I said, good day.
Posted by: C-C-G at January 01, 2008 06:54 PM (ojkss)
To assume that he only did it because of the military plates is quite short-sighted and conspiracy-minded. It isn't assuming when Grodner stated upon being caught "You think you can do whatever you want with Department of Defense license plates and tags"
Reading is your friend, Book Learned Guy. You should do more of it, preferably before writing.
Posted by: Pablo at January 01, 2008 06:55 PM (yTndK)
BTW, these were not DOD plates, but Illinois Specialty Plates. But Grodner seems to have confused that which leads to the next obvious question: Did Grodner think he was vandalizing DOD property? That would be tremendously stupid, and a federal crime.
Posted by: Pablo at January 01, 2008 06:59 PM (yTndK)
I'll even go so far to say that anyone DEFENDING his actions, is also a douchebag.
Seems to be an excess of douchebaggery on the left these days.
Posted by: Conservative CBU at January 01, 2008 07:22 PM (La7YV)
Posted by: C-C-G at January 01, 2008 07:32 PM (ojkss)
Posted by: Pablo at January 01, 2008 08:48 PM (yTndK)
Yeah, that is a shame. But he was probably counting on President Hillary to pardon him if it was a DOD vehicle and he got caught. (evil grin)
Posted by: C-C-G at January 01, 2008 09:13 PM (ojkss)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 01, 2008 10:42 PM (ERV3B)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at January 01, 2008 10:55 PM (Lgw9b)
as to his feeling persecuted because he says he is jewish, someone ought to find out what synagogue he goes to and send letters containing the story to the rabbi and to the board. this did not happen because he is jewish---and as a vet I would love the opportunity to discuss it with him publicly.
Posted by: velvel in decatur at January 02, 2008 12:41 PM (cOYYN)
Posted by: ozzzy4444 at January 02, 2008 04:25 PM (qGMwR)
Posted by: ozzzy4444 at January 02, 2008 04:39 PM (qGMwR)
It was probably more along the lines of a "crime of opportunity" coupled with a momentary failure of his "better judgment" circuit not filtering the "stupid" from the "rational".
"Simple fact: the Marine was a douche for backing down a one-way..."
You don't live in Chicago, doya? Never spent much time there, dijja?
Backing down one-way streets is a common occurence ... to get to parking spots or because you missed -- as this jarhead did -- the address of his buddy. It's not like this was an alleyway we're talking about, here, it was a normal Chicago street, two lanes wide with parallel parking on both curbs. It's just one-way. Backing down a one-way isn't a real hazard, and it doesn't indicate much in the way of "douchery", since pretty much everyone who owns a car in Chicago does it, more or less regularly.
Posted by: rwilymz at January 03, 2008 12:47 PM (2KK9O)
Apparently the book he reads is "The Frat-Star's Guide To Chugging Beer and Passing Out."
And I don't buy BLG's theory that if it had been him the lawyer saw would have said "You think that just because you're tall, intelligent, and incredibly handsome, you can do whatever you want."
Book Learned Guy may own books, but probably not any mirrors.
Posted by: Chicagoan at January 03, 2008 03:34 PM (8Lg5R)
How disgusting!
Posted by: Max at January 04, 2008 12:14 AM (Y/e75)
Posted by: Ron at January 04, 2008 09:09 AM (AiJXe)
Posted by: Jack at January 05, 2008 01:01 AM (zpOhj)
You see, there are a lot of people living in this country who have NEVER worn the uniforms of service to the United States of America. Therefore, they do not understand the concept of "Adapt, Improvise and Overcome." We, the special few who have served in uniform and in combat situations understand this concept totally. We survive because of it. We know that those things that are difficult take a little longer to "fix." We also know that the impossible takes a little longer...But, we get the job done....SEMPER FI, MARINE!!!
Posted by: jOHN at January 05, 2008 12:37 PM (AiJXe)
Posted by: Bubba at January 05, 2008 06:09 PM (RygMp)
Posted by: MSgt(ret) at January 05, 2008 09:48 PM (lCq3w)
This was not a one-time thing, but a six-month pattern of illegal behavior that disgraces his uniform and embarrasses all those who wear it.
The taxpayers paid this douche for his ability to lead men in combat and serve as an example of honor & fidelity. The key issue here is: would you trust this asswipe to lead YOUR kids in combat?
End of discussion. The real shame is that no one noticed his character flaws earlier.
Posted by: MSgt G. L. W. at January 06, 2008 03:53 AM (VSMyZ)
Whoever that AG or DA was that made that stupid, narrow-minded and self-serving comment deserves to be disbarred as fast as that mope Grodner should be as soon as he is convicted.
This soldier should be served with a subpoena to appear in court, and the Marine Corps needs to honor that subpoena to allow justice to be served for him here in the United States just as his service in Iraq provides them there with the same.
This outhouse lawyer needs to know that his kind is not above the law simply because he's a little more adept at playing the game. MSgt G. L. W. also needs to back-off and regroup with the hysterical rhetoric as well, unless he can provide clear-cut evidence of wrong on the part of the Officer in question.
Respectfully Submitted,
An Old US Army Soldier from the 'Burbs.
Posted by: beanhead54 at January 06, 2008 12:45 PM (PMOxQ)
I'm against the occupation, but I'd never do that to anyone's car, and certainly not to someone risking his life to serve my country. It's abhorrent, and indefensible. But using the actions of one imbecile to attack millions of others for their opinions is hardly patriotic or American.
Posted by: Just My Opinion at January 06, 2008 10:52 PM (9kfFD)
Are you a Marine / Solider / Airman? Would like to know. I personally know Mike, his brother Bill and some of their friends. I am a former Marine of ten years. Your post shows your true character. A wimp.
This Marine, is a man of undisputed character and courage. He has been voluntarily in harms way as a Marine Reservist and volunteered to go back (which he is in the process of doing) to Iraq. Has seen numerous front line altercations.
For you to make a statement that this officer (he is a Sgt, not an officer) and suggest that his honor and fidelity are in err, only makes me confident that you are presenting your post and self under the false solider act. You should watch your course. You could be libel.
I would personally send my children to war with Mike and his brothers. They are why we have what we have. Freedom, not tryanny.
Watch your mouth faker. We have this biggest faternity ever known and are well connected. Bigger than Notre Dame or any Ivy league school. Its called USMC. We take care of our own.
Enough said
Posted by: teeitup at January 07, 2008 07:18 PM (QiL5C)
All is not lost, however: If you go to www.yellow.com/white.html and in put his first and last names and his ZIP code (60626), you can find his contact information in case you want to write him or telephone him.
Posted by: Clifton Palmer McLendon at January 07, 2008 09:52 PM (bcsC8)
Posted by: Clifton Palmer McLendon at January 07, 2008 11:23 PM (bcsC8)
Court will hide ID of illegal immigrant employer
A federal court will keep secret the identity of an Arizona business owner who admits in a sworn statement to hiring illegal immigrants.
The business owner, who remains anonymous, has filed an affidavit in federal court saying he was employing people not in this country legally last year when the lawsuit was filed, and he intends to continue to do so even with the new state law that took effect Jan. 1.
That law allows a judge to suspend or revoke any state licenses of firms that knowingly hire undocumented workers.
Attorney David Selden, who represents businesses challenging the law, said the purpose of the affidavit was to prove to U.S. District Court Judge Neil Wake that the law will harm at least one company.
The judge had previously indicated he might not be able to rule on the validity of the law without some proof someone could get in legal trouble for disobeying it.
Selden said the move is justified because the business owner faces both the threat of prosecution if his identity becomes known, as well as the possibility of actual physical harm.
LINK:
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/105888
Here's Dave's info. Call him up and tell him how much you appreciate his efforts, and while your a it, find Dave's home number and post it so others can call him there and tell Dave how much like like his efforts in this are:
http://www.ballardspahr.com/about/lawyers.asp?id=1855
Posted by: Ja at January 08, 2008 12:10 PM (G8g1Q)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0291 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0239 seconds, 38 records returned.
Page size 22 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.