Thompson Responds to Roger Simon's Hit-Piece in The Politico
With humor: "Just remember...we don't raise our hands when we're told to, and we don't wear any hats, unless they're our own."
Thompson's dig is funny; the response from The Politico thus far is not. Despite attempts to reach them via both the media and editorial email addresses on their site, The Politico seems to be going the route of The New Republic, and seems intent on trying a strategy of stonewalling. Perhaps they are hoping that the story of Simon's doctored quote will simply go away. I was hoping that as an ostensibly "new media" organization they would address controversy with transparency, but that does not seem to be the case. Old habits apparently die hard. Update: Now on Youtube.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 01:03 PM
Comments
Posted by: Mike G in Corvallis at December 21, 2007 01:18 PM (qmdN5)
Posted by: Gullyborg at December 21, 2007 01:21 PM (Vy/A9)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at December 21, 2007 01:29 PM (P17op)
Posted by: David at December 21, 2007 01:49 PM (x25n0)
Posted by: David at December 21, 2007 01:53 PM (x25n0)
Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin at December 21, 2007 04:42 PM (FngTJ)
Roger thought he was so slick he didn't think he would get caught.
Spread the other research around because most folks are apparently supporting liberals who shouldn't be running on a republican ticket;
http://candidateresearch.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Winghunter at December 21, 2007 05:59 PM (2vp3x)
What exactly was it about the "misquote" of Thompson that was unfair?
It's not unusual to truncate quotes like that. It is of course objectionable if the omitted phrase changes the meaning. But how was that the case here?
As quoted: "I've got a silly hat rule."
As said: "I've got a silly hat rule that I'm about to violate." Which rule Thompson did NOT, then, go on to violate.
In other words, he was offered the helmet, and didn't put it on, citing the "silly hat rule." Just like the Politico article said.
Posted by: JC at December 22, 2007 01:30 AM (Q/itq)
Posted by: Laika's Last Woof at December 22, 2007 01:45 AM (9ruXO)
Posted by: davod at December 22, 2007 04:34 AM (llh3A)
Simon was implying that Fred was sour and borderline insulting, completely missing the good natured banter that occurred, which the truncated quote tends to show. As do the video and pictures of the smiling faces.
Simon also states in his very first sentence that Fred never got off the bus, which is false.
Though Simon says it was "no big deal" he wasn't allowed to sit in on the interview with the local editor, he seems like he's pouting about it like a widdle girl. Man up, Simon.
Fred isn't lazy. Not finishing a quote--that's lazy.
Posted by: Noel at December 22, 2007 07:01 AM (0eKTE)
Posted by: vince spataro at December 22, 2007 09:59 AM (Cwho3)
A good man, a real man, and the leader of America in 2008--Join me voters --Fred's tops with class, toughness, brains and manners too!!!
Posted by: jftous at December 23, 2007 01:45 AM (pn7ik)
Posted by: chas at December 24, 2007 12:58 AM (6a+Fd)
Posted by: Gary at December 25, 2007 09:24 AM (BZHuI)
I could go on, but that's enough geekiness for one Christmas morning.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 25, 2007 11:09 AM (4tS0i)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0128 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0097 seconds, 24 records returned.
Page size 11 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.